Tarleton State University - Athletics NCAA Division II to Division I Proposed Transition Plan. Discussion Draft Only December 21, 2017

Similar documents
Texan Club. Are we satisfied being a top regional institution (in all respects) if provided the opportunity to become nationally relevant?

Unit for Assessment: Men's Tennis, includes equipment center, facilities and weight room

UAB Athletics Strategic Planning

University of Tennessee Athletics Department Overview

Campus Forum on Athletics April 3, :30 pm

Approve Intercollegiate Athletics Financial Stability Plan

The Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data

Rockhurst University Department of Athletics Strategic Plan. Rockhurst University Mission. Mission Alignment. Core Values Alignment

White Paper on NAIA Conferences Revised March 2013

MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR OF ATHLETICS OUR MISSION OUR CORE VALUES OUR GUIDING PRINCIPLES

WILLIAM J. WEIDNER. 11/ /2013 Somebody Cares Hernando County, Inc. Founder / President / Servant Leader

/ CAMPAIGN PRIORITIES INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS1

Boundless: The Campaign for the College of Charleston

1. Call to Order Meeting called to order by Michele Martin (Chair) at 4:00 p.m.

About ASC Feasibility Study for The W

Christopher B. Walker

MINES ATHLETICS CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM

EACH BEGINS WITH YOU. -JAKE ELLIOTT 17

The Vision for the Badger Performance Center

LTAC P.O. Box 1190 Ruston, LA 71273

CONTENTS TABLE OF LETTER FROM MARK JACKSON DIRECTOR OF ATHLETICS LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR OF ATHLETICS WHY YOUR SUPPORT IS NEEDED

Alfond Fund. University of Maine Membership Information

Alfond Fund. University of Maine Membership Information

STEPHEN F. AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL (JULY 2016) Table of Contents

A MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR OF ATHLETICS

West Texas A&M University. All-Staff Spring Meeting May 6, 2015

Overview Camps and Clinics

We talk about developing

Guide for. Four-Year Transfers. For student-athletes at four-year colleges FOUR-YEAR TRANSFER GUIDE 1

Volunteer Representative Program Manual & Guide

Board Agenda Item G.1. Board Agenda Item G.2.

Equities in Athletics Report

NCAA & NAIA Athletics

A Study of the Economic Impact of Ohio Athletics on Athens County, OH

ATHLETICS DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW

The University of New Mexico Athletic Communications

ATHLETICS AT FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY. A Special Overview

Missouri S&T Athletics

Purdue Athletic Affairs Committee. Report to the University Senate April 18, 2016

IMPORTANT DATES. Cougar Fans, usfcougars.com

Intercollegiate Athletics Mission. Guiding Principles. TEAMWORK: United Supportive Humble. FOCUS: Commitment Effort drive ATTITUDE: TENACITY:

STUDENT-ATHLETE SPOTLIGHT ABOUT STARS CLUB

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Intercollegiate Athletics Information Program Thursday, November 13, 2014 Catonsville HS. Information for your prospective student-athletes (PSA)

Equities in Athletics Report

Adjusted Graduation Gap: NCAA Division-I Men s and Women s Basketball

NCAA IMPOSES PENALTIES IN TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY INFRACTIONS CASE

Ronald G. Christian N 968 Road Phone: (cell)

Shoreline Community College Athletic Department Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (EADA)

Symposium: Athletics and Yale. May 30, 2013

CORPORATE PARTNER PROGRAM RIDER UNIVERSTIY ATHLETICS 2083 LAWRENCEVILLE RD. LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648

On Women s Athletics at Clemson: University Sports Culture Needs to (Re)Evolve. By Bryan Denham

Timothy Allen Duncan 105 Seawright Drive Fayetteville, GA Cell

J.J. Pearce Mustangs Recruiting Seminar. College Recruiting

ATHLETICS STRATEGIC PLAN

NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Intercollegiate Athletics Strategic Plan

FRESHMAN YEAR FRESHMAN YEAR

This page left blank intentionally.

SUPPORTING STUDENT-ATHLETES SINCE 1934

High School Sports Recruiting

The College at Brockport Department of Intercollegiate Athletics

Preparing to be a Collegiate Student Athlete

LTAC MISSION STATEMENT

History. 2 Dallas Park & Recreation

UTPB Compliance NCAA Compliance: The Basics

Average Annual Costs for One Student-Athlete

FOOTBALL HEAD COACH EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Multipurpose facility: Why it will benefit Temple and Philadelphia

MEMBERSHIP THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS

DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ATHLETICS. CAMPS and CLINICS MANUAL

Boston College Athletics Department

College Recruitment and the Berkeley Carroll Student-Athlete

THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI EAGLE CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FUND MEMBERSHIP GUIDE

Eagle Club. Scholarship Fund

Intercollegiate Athletics Report on Academic & Student Services

Department of Intercollegiate Athletics Policy Manual

October Rules Education. Olympic Sports October 9, 2014

PAC-12 AVERAGE athletic ENDOWMENT: $ 63,000,000

To the friends of BU Athletics:

Plainsmen College Recruiting Workshop

Mercyhurst Athletic Club. Strength in numbers

UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT. OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS---This report is organized as follows:

IPTAY. IPTAY is a Brand

Corporate Giving & Sponsorship Opportunities

Corporate EDUCATION. Who is a REPRESENTATIVE OF ATHLETIC INTEREST? Guidelines for Boosters, Corporate Sponsors and Friends of AUM Athletics

Adjusted Graduation Gap: NCAA Division-I Football

Media Contact: Brett Estrella (508) ,

Richardson ISD Recruiting, Hiring, and Promotions Report November 14, 2016

WESTERN STATE COLLEGE of COLORADO ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT FUND-RAISING POLICY. Updated: December 10, Drafted by: Greg Waggoner, Athletic Director

La Salle University Athletics Corporate Partnership Guide

UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT PINE BLUFF PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION NOVEMBER 5, 2014

NCAA Compliance-Eligibility Audit

INTRODUCTORY SUMMARY JCSU ATHLETIC BOOSTER INFORMTION STATEMENT

OUR STUDENTS: THE CASE FOR SUPPORT

Media Contact: Destini Orr , Todd Currie ,

IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (ISUPP) Athletics Ethical Conduct ISUPP 8170 POLICY INFORMATION I. POLICY STATEMENT

March Rules. Education. Georgia State University Department of Athletics. Olympic Sports March 26 th, 2015

University of Idaho Sun Belt Conference Membership Presentation. February 15, 2016 Chuck Staben, President

Navy Athletics Sponsorship Opportunities May 2018

2 A Division II institution may make a four-year athletics scholarship offer to a prospective student-athlete. A) True. B) False.

Transcription:

.. Tarleton State University - Athletics NCAA Division II to Division I Proposed Transition Plan Discussion Draft Only December 21, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Benefits of Reclassifying to NCAA Division I.. 3 Challenges of Reclassifying to NCAA Division I. 4 Budget Considerations... 5 Academic Executive Summary.. 10 1

TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS NCAA Division II to Division I Proposed Transition Plan Introduction At Tarleton, intercollegiate athletics develops our student-athletes into leaders who will contribute meaningfully to society. The athletics program at Tarleton enhances the image and reputation of the institution, and visibly demonstrates the university's core values of tradition, integrity, civility, leadership, excellence, and service. Having a successful athletics program requires significant resources -- often 8-15 percent of a university's overall budget. As a front porch to the university, athletics not only molds studentathletes, but also the student body. A thriving athletics program engages the student body and invigorates the student experience. Athletics instills valuable attributes -- discipline, work ethic, sportsmanship, leadership -- and those qualities permeate the campus to establish its culture and image. Since leaving the NAIA in 1994 to rejoin the Lone Star Conference (NCAA Division II), Tarleton intercollegiate athletics has gained strength and prominence across the board. Since 2000, Tarleton has produced seven national champions in track and field, reached four national NCAA II Elite Eight tournaments in men's basketball, had eight regional championships in nine years in women's golf, appeared in nine regional women s tennis tournaments in 11 years, and won numerous conference and regional titles in all 14 sports. And, the university s athletic programs ranked 23rd nationally out of 305 Division II schools, in the Learfield Directors Cup the measure of overall success -- in 2014-15. Victories, sportsmanship and favorable exposure have brought a healthy expansion of the university s brand and marketability, its image and reputation, and cast Tarleton in a favorable light. This plan explores the potential transition from NCAA Division II to Division I -- the resources required, the processes needed, and the benefits anticipated in moving to a larger stage in intercollegiate athletics. Tarleton's continuing growth, performance and vision present a favorable opportunity to evaluate its current situation and consider how athletics adequately supports Tarleton's values and ambitions. 2

Benefits of Reclassifying to NCAA Division I Aligns with the direction the university is taking in enhancing its academic and enrollment profiles. Tarleton has grown at an unprecedented pace, topping 13,000 students. The campus has been transformed and new academic programs give students an opportunity to prepare for leadership in their chosen professional careers. A move to NCAA Division I would be historic one of the biggest decisions in the school s history. Energizes alumni and supporters, especially in Dallas-Fort Worth. The excitement generated by athletics benefits all areas of the university, from academic programs to student recruitment to fundraising. In just its second year as a member of the Division I Southland Conference (SLC), Abilene Christian opened the 2014 football season against Georgia State at the Georgia Dome on national television. Tarleton could not buy advertising equal to the exposure Abilene Christian received. On Sept. 14, 2014, second-year SLC member Incarnate Word, formerly of the Lone Star Conference, faced No. 1-ranked North Dakota State in the Fargo Dome, also on national television. ESPN s fan-favorite College Game Day show originated from Fargo, and broadcaster Lee Corso picked Incarnate Word to win. Before the day was over, Incarnate Word had more than one million hits on its university and athletic websites, so much traffic that the sites crashed. Three months later, Incarnate Word defeated Big 10 member Nebraska, 74-71, in basketball in Lincoln. That evening on ESPN, Incarnate Word was the No. 1 sports story in the nation, with more social media hits and media exposure than any other story in college or professional sports. Alumni and fans are justifiably more excited about similar matchups on the national stage as compared to Division II institutions in small stadiums with little to no television coverage. This move could energize our alumni base and supporters, increasing our brand image and reputation through national exposure, which would have its greatest impact in the DFW area and north central Texas our roots. The excitement generated by athletics would affect all areas of the university, including academic programs, student recruitment and fundraising. Provides opportunities for increased revenue and marketing. In football, SLC member Stephen F. Austin received $400,000 to play Kansas State University in Manhattan. In 2017, SLC member Nicholls State was paid $550,000 to play Texas A&M in College Station. In men's basketball, SLC member Texas A&M - Corpus Christi was paid $90,000 to play the University of Oklahoma in Norman. 3

Tarleton athletics has experienced success in securing marketing agreements with Ford, National Farm Life and Nike, but usually large national companies allocate advertising dollars to Division I athletics. Stephen F. Austin has an enrollment similar to Tarleton, but its five-year marketing agreement with the Southeast Texas Ford Dealers is $450,000 over five years. Tarleton's marketing agreement with the North Texas Ford Dealers is $100,000 over five years. Marketing agreements like Tarleton's with the North Texas Ford Dealers are extremely rare in Division II. Tarleton is an exception, but in Division I more opportunities would open. Tarleton also has done well in engaging local businesses and building the Texan Club, but more than 90 percent of Texan Club members are in the Stephenville area. Division I could open the door to expanding the Texan Club base. With increases in initial eligibility standards, progress-toward-degree standards and creation of the Academic Progress Rate, Division I athletics is designed to ensure student-athletes receive exemplary educational and intercollegiate athletics experiences. Tarleton will accrue the benefits of Division I stature as the marketability and retention of students likely will increase in the transition. Challenges of Reclassifying to Division I Requires a significant additional investment, primarily in scholarships. The average athletic budget in the Lone Star Conference is $5.5 million, compared to $12 million for the Southland Conference. A summary of financial needs/recommendations is outlined later in this document. Four-year moratorium on postseason play. A transition to NCAA Division I carries a mandatory four-year absence from postseason play for all sports, making it difficult initially to recruit student-athletes, as they will not have the opportunity to compete for conference and national championships. The NCAA requires a $1.61 million application fee to reclassify to Division I. This substantial immediate investment will require spending priorities to be evaluated. It is more challenging to compete for Division I national championships in sports other than football. Football is the only Division I sport with two school-size classifications Football Championship Series (FCS) and Football Bowl Series (FBS) ensuring that large, power conference universities do not compete directly for post-season berths and honors with schools in conferences like the WAC and Southland. In every other sport, all Division I schools compete against each other for national championships. Deep NCAA postseason runs can be almost out of reach for some programs. 4

Budget Considerations In 2017-18, 90.37% of Tarleton's athletic budget came from institutional funding. The tables below shows that this percentage likely would decrease as a Division I school, with additional external revenue required. These tables provide a possible baseline for developing a sustainable model. Percentage of Tarleton Budget Dedicated to Athletics Proposed Funding for NCAA Division I 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 Tarleton Budget $ 174,386,000 $ 179,132,000 $ 184,147,696 $ 189,303,831 $ 196,604,338 $ 202,109,259 DI Athletics Spending $ 7,531,661 $ 8,753,815 $ 9,560,599 $ 10,662,609 $ 11,226,674 $ 11,854,628 % of Tarleton Budget 4.32% 4.89% 5.19% 5.63% 5.71% 5.87% Percentage of Tarleton Athletic Spending Derived from Institutional Funding Proposed Funding for NCAA Division I 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 DI Athletic Budget $ 7,531,661 $ 8,753,815 $ 9,560,599 $ 10,662,609 $ 11,226,674 $ 11,854,628 Insitutional Funding $ 6,806,591 $ 8,410,788 $ 8,663,112 $ 8,923,005 $ 9,190,696 $ 9,466,416 Percent 90.37% 96.08% 90.61% 83.69% 81.86% 79.85% External Revenue A move to NCAA Division I would affect athletic fundraising, corporate partnerships, advertising, game guarantees, ticket sales, stadium rentals, suite sales all considered external revenue. Currently, external revenue provides 9.63 percent of the athletics budget. Advertising dollars refers to all Texan Club corporate memberships, radio, video board and marketing agreements (ex: North Texas Ford, National Farm Life). On average, 10-15 percent of an athletic department's budget is derived from external revenue (Division I national average), while 85-90 percent comes from institutional funding. This estimate can be higher or lower depending on a school s location and conference affiliation. Only a handful of Division I, the top programs in power conferences, raise enough money to fully support their athletic budget. The following table shows the amount the Tarleton Athletic Department projects to raise in external revenue through FY 2022-2023, assuming an invitation to a Division I conference is extended in 2018-2019. The 2017-2018 numbers are actual numbers; the next five years are projections. 5

Tarleton Athletics External Revenue as NCAA Division I Member Revenue Source 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 Annual Fund (TX CL IND) 64,850 84,305 92,736 102,009 112,210 123,431 Corporate/Advertising 206,378 268,291 289,192 312,327 337,312 364,296 Corporate/Advertising in Kind Gifts 120,875 157,138 167,508 178,563 190,347 202,910 Corporate/Advertising Total 327,253 425,429 456,700 490,890 527,660 567,206 T-Club 9,607 12,489 14,987 17,984 21,581 25,897 Individual Gifts 65,700 85,410 97,303 113,520 129,737 162,171 Game Guarantees 12,000 300,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,300,000 Stadium Rentals 85,750 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Ticket Sales 151,704 185,000 210,000 220,000 225,000 235,000 NCAA Enhancement 8,206 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Suite Sales/Club Level - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL 725,070 1,692,633 2,221,726 2,544,403 2,816,187 3,013,705 Percentage of Athletic Budget Derived from External Revenue as Division I Member 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 Athletic Budget $ 7,531,661 $ 8,753,815 $ 9,560,599 $ 10,662,609 $ 11,226,674 $ 11,854,628 External Revnue $ 725,070 $ 1,692,633 $ 2,221,726 $ 2,544,403 $ 2,816,187 $ 3,013,705 Percent 9.63% 19.34% 23.24% 23.86% 25.08% 25.42% 6

Athletic Program Operating Budgets as NCAA Division I Member Tarleton Athletic Administrative Salaries as NCAA Division I Member 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 Athletic Director 152,144 155,187 158,321 161,487 164,717 168,008 171,368 Administrative Assistant 32,287 32,933 33,592 34,244 34,929 35,628 36,341 Administrative Assistant 33,488 34,158 34,841 35,538 36,249 36,974 37,713 Assistant to AD 49,425 50,414 51,422 52,450 53,499 54,569 55,660 Assistant AD/Compliance 53,896 54,974 56,073 57,194 58,338 59,505 60,695 Compliance Coordinator - 40,000 40,800 41,616 42,449 43,722 45,034 Compliance GA 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 Assistant AD/Academic - - - 48,000 48,960 49,940 51,438 Academic Coordinator 43,764 44,639 45,532 46,443 47,372 48,319 49,285 Academic GA - - - 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 Sr. Associate AD/SWA 77,816 79,372 80,959 82,578 84,230 85,915 87,633 Assistant AD for Athletic Coom 47,037 47,978 48,938 49,917 50,915 51,933 52,972 Assistant Director Athletic Coom 37,696 38,450 39,219 40,003 40,803 41,619 42,451 SID GA 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 Assistant AD Development 59,152 60,335 61,541 62,772 64,027 65,308 66,614 Development Officer - 40,000 40,800 41,616 42,449 43,722 45,034 Associate AD Operations 57,427 58,575 59,747 60,942 62,161 63,404 64,672 Marketing/Ticket Coordinator - 40,000 40,800 41,616 42,449 43,722 45,034 Assistant AD for Sports Medicine 60,343 61,550 62,781 64,036 65,317 66,623 67,955 Head Athletic Trainer 57,759 58,914 60,092 61,294 62,520 63,770 65,025 Head Athletic Trainer 44,125 45,008 45,908 46,826 47,763 48,718 49,692 Assistant AD/Strength 71,679 73,112 74,574 76,065 77,586 79,138 80,721 Assistant Strength 38,563 39,334 40,121 40,923 41,741 42,576 43,428 Total 945,401 1,083,733 1,104,861 1,188,760 1,211,674 1,236,313 1,261,965 Benefits 311,982 357,632 364,604 392,291 399,852 407,983 416,448 Grand Total 1,257,383 1,441,365 1,469,465 1,581,051 1,611,526 1,644,296 1,678,413 7

Tarleton Athletic Coaches' Salaries as NCAA Division I Member 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 Baseball Head Coach 66,446 69,768 73,256 76,919 80,765 84,803 Baseball Assistant Coach 39,923 40,721 41,535 42,366 43,213 44,077 Baseball Assistant Coach - - - 34,000 34,680 35,720 Men's Basketball Head Coach - 100,000 105,000 110,250 115,763 121,551 Men's Basketball Assistant Coach 60,195 61,399 62,627 63,880 65,158 66,461 Men's Basketball Assistant Coach 49,000 49,980 50,980 52,000 53,040 54,101 Men's Basketball Assistant Coach 40,000 40,800 41,616 42,448 43,297 44,163 Football Head Coach 122,400 128,520 134,946 141,693 148,778 156,217 Football Assistant Coach 66,810 68,146 69,509 70,899 72,317 73,763 Football Assistant Coach 48,960 49,939 50,938 51,957 52,996 54,056 Football Assistant Coach 48,960 49,939 50,938 51,957 52,996 54,056 Football Assistant Coach 40,800 41,616 42,448 43,297 44,163 45,046 Football Assistant Coach 32,640 33,293 33,959 34,638 35,331 36,038 Football Assistant Coach 32,000 32,640 33,293 33,959 34,638 35,331 Football Assistant Coach - 45,000 45,900 47,277 48,695 50,156 Football Operations 30,000 30,600 31,212 32,148 33,112 34,105 Women's Basketball Head Coach 68,979 72,428 76,049 79,851 80,250 84,263 Women's Basketball Assistant Coach 45,900 46,818 47,754 48,709 49,683 50,677 Women's Basketball Assistant Coach 20,063 38,000 38,760 39,536 40,722 41,994 Women's Basketball Operations 30,000 30,600 31,212 32,148 33,112 34,105 Softball Head Coach 53,040 54,101 55,183 56,287 57,413 58,561 Softball Assistant Coach 35,700 36,414 37,142 37,885 38,643 39,416 Softball Assistant Coach - - - 34,000 34,860 35,906 Volleyball Head Coach 58,140 59,303 60,489 61,699 61,833 63,070 Volleyball Assistant Coach 41,004 41,824 42,660 43,513 44,383 45,271 Volleyball Assistant Coach - - 30,000 30,600 31,518 33,438 Golf Head Coach 63,080 64,342 65,629 66,942 68,281 69,647 Golf Assistant Coach - - - 30,000 30,600 31,518 Tennis Head Coach 69,866 71,263 73,688 74,142 75,625 77,138 Tennis Assistant Coach - - - 30,000 30,600 31,518 Track & Field and Cross Country Head Coach 67,097 68,439 69,808 71,204 72,628 74,081 Track & Field and Cross Country Assistant Coach 35,700 36,414 37,142 37,885 38,643 39,416 Track & Field and Cross Country Assistant Coach - - - 30,000 30,600 31,518 Total 1,266,703 1,462,307 1,533,673 1,734,089 1,778,336 1,831,181 Benefits 418,012 482,561 506,112 572,249 586,851 604,290 Total with Benefits 1,684,715 1,944,868 2,039,785 2,306,338 2,365,187 2,435,471 8

Tarleton Athletic Graduate Assistants' Salaries as NCAA Division I Member 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 Baseball 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 Football 28,800 28,800 28,800 28,800 28,800 28,800 Women's Basketball 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 Softball 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 Volleyball 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 Golf 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 Tennis 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 Total 115,200 115,200 115,200 115,200 115,200 115,200 Benefits 15,206 15,206 15,206 15,206 15,206 15,206 Grand Total 130,406 130,406 130,406 130,406 130,406 130,406 Tarleton Athletic Operating Budgets as NCAA Division I Member 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 Administration 412,000 454,360 498,830 545,500 594,464 645,821 Cheerleading 25,000 26,750 28,581 30,497 32,501 34,597 Athletic Communication 28,245 30,092 32,024 34,044 36,155 38,360 Sports Medicine 55,000 57,650 60,409 63,281 66,271 69,382 Compliance 11,025 12,356 13,754 15,223 16,765 18,383 NCAA Annual Dues 900 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 Grounds 45,000 48,250 50,726 53,307 55,996 58,798 Medical 420,000 452,600 486,751 522,516 559,963 599,161 Athletic Performance 23,000 23,940 24,916 25,928 26,979 28,069 Sports Network 69,274 73,352 77,611 82,058 86,700 91,545 Total 1,089,444 1,181,150 1,275,402 1,374,154 1,477,594 1,585,917 Tarleton Athletic Facilities In recent years, several upgrades have improved the university s athletic facilities. In 2012, Tarleton added four tennis courts to the existing four, making eight total. All courts were resurfaced. Netting was installed for the backstops at the baseball/softball complex and lighting was added to the softball field. The Texas A&M University Board of Regents approved $24 million to expand Tarleton Memorial Stadium from 7,000 seats to more than 9,000 and to convert the west-side stands to seating for home fans. Renovations include an expanded press box and suites, 9

additional premium seating with chair backs, enhanced entrances and ticket booths, and improved concessions. The football field turf and track-and-field surface has been or is in the process of being replaced. Seating Capacity Institution Football Basketbal Volleyball Baseball Softball Track Soccer Tennis l Abilene Christian 8,500 4,500 4,500 4,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 500 Central Arkansas Houston Baptist Incarnate Word 9,000 5,000 400 1,000 1,000 750 750 200 5,000 1,000 1,000 500 500 0 500 0 6,000 2,500 2,500 1,200 500 6,000 6,000 200 Lamar 16,000 10,080 500 3,500 1,500 500 500 500 McNeese State 17,610 8,000 500 2,000 1,000 1,000 500 200 New Orleans 0 8,785 1,760 800 0 0 0 0 Nicholls State 10,500 3,800 3,800 3,200 500 0 1,000 200 Northwestern State Sam Houston State Southwestern Louisiana Stephen F. Austin Corpus Christi A&M 15,971 3,400 3,400 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,000 500 12,500 6,100 6,100 1,200 400 12,500 3,000 200 7,408 7,500 7,500 3,000 1,000 1,000 500 500 14,575 7,203 600 1,000 750 14,575 2,800 250 0 8,000 1,200 600 300 1,000 1,000 250 Tarleton State 9,800 2,400 900 550 250 7,000 0 300 Academic Executive Summary Division I is committed to an intercollegiate athletics model that supports the academic mission of its member schools. Graduation rates of student-athletes are higher in Division I than Division II universities due in part to enhanced eligibility standards and the Division I Academic Performance Program. Division I went through drastic reform back in 2003 to hold institutions accountable for the academic progress of its student-athlete s. The Academic Progress Rate (APR) was implemented, which is team-based metric that accounts for the eligibility and retention of each 10

student-athlete for each academic term. The APR system includes rewards for superior academic performance and penalties for teams that do not achieve certain academic benchmarks. The following is a link to more information - http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research/divisioni-academic-progress-rate-apr. The Graduation Success Rate for Division I college athletes has climbed to 86 percent, while Division II student-athletes outperform the general student body. The federal rate for student-athletes remained the same at 55 percent, while the federal rate for the overall student body increased to 49 percent, a difference of six percentage points. Academic Requirements Currently, first-time freshmen receive full admission to Tarleton if they graduated from high school in the top half of their class. Additionally, students must provide SAT or ACT scores. Students who graduated between the 40th and 49th percentiles of their high school class must achieve a minimum 950 on the SAT or 20 on the ACT. According to NCAA Division II academic requirements, a student-athlete must complete 16 core courses, earn a high school GPA of at least 2.00, earn a SAT combined score of at least 820, and graduate from high school. Based on university data, current Tarleton students beginning in fall 2011 had an average SAT score of 974.09 and an average ACT score of 20.7. For Fall 2013, these numbers were 966.1 and 20.87. During the same time period, the average scores for athletes on the SAT were 938.71 (2011) and 913.8 (2013). The average scores on the ACT for those students participating in athletics were 19.93 and 19.59. Statistically, 82.12 percent of students participating in athletics at Tarleton met the minimum Division II requirements for the SAT in 2011 and 77.04 percent in 2013. Using the Tarleton requirement of 950 for students graduating from high school between the 40th and 49th percentiles, 46.81 percent of athletes scored above 950 in 2011, while 38.97percent accomplished this in 2013. Division I academic requirements include the completion of 16 core courses, 10 of which must be completed before the student's senior year; a GPA of 2.30; an SAT or ACT score on a sliding scale based on the high school GPA; and graduating from high school. Related to current Tarleton entrance requirements, potential athletes graduating in the top half of their high school class only need to submit SAT or ACT scores. Assuming these students meet the other Division I requirements, they would qualify to play for Tarleton. Students graduating within the 40th and 49th percentiles would have to meet the required SAT or ACT scores based on their high school GPA. These scores may or may not be equal to or above the 950 and 20 required by Tarleton on the SAT and ACT. Transfer students applying to Tarleton must meet the following requirements: With 30 or more semester hours or transferable college credits, they must have a GPA of 2.0 or higher; with fewer than 30 hours, they must have a cumulative GPA of 2.8. If the GPA is between 2.0 and 2.79, the student must meet the standard of first-time freshman applicants. 11

Division II transfer requirements include 12 semester hours of transferable degree credit and a cumulative GPA of 2.20 for students who have no four-year attendance. The potential athlete must also have six hours of transferable English and three semester hours of transferable math and science. To qualify to participate in Division I athletics, the potential athlete must have completed an average of 12 semester hours of transferable credit, attended one full-time semester, and have a minimum GPA of 2.5 with no more than two credit hours of physical education. Retention rates are another factor related to participation in athletics. Student (non-athlete) retention rates for those admitted to Tarleton in fall 2011 are: Fall 2012-66%; Fall 2013-57%; Fall 2014-49%. The corresponding figures for athletes are: Fall 2012-81%; Fall 2013-68%; Fall 2014-60%. In all cases, the student-athlete percentages are higher than those for non-athletes. 12