Prevalence and Factors Associated with eedle Stick Injuries among Registered urses in Public Sector Tertiary Care Hospitals of Pakistan Haris Habib, Ejaz Ahmed Khan, Anwar Aziz Vol. 3 No. 2 (February 2011) Featured Article from IOMC 2011 Conference http://www.iomcworld.com/2011/ International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine & Public Health (IJCRIMPH) ISSN 1840-4529 Journal Type: Open Access Volume 3 Number 2 Journal details including published articles and guidelines for authors can be found at: http://www.iomcworld.com/ijcrimph/ To cite this Article: Habib H, Ahmed Khan E, Aziz A. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Needle Stick Injuries among Registered Nurses in Public Sector Tertiary Care Hospitals of Pakistan.. 2011; 3 (2):124-130. Article URL: http://iomcworld.com/ijcrimph/ijcrimph-v03-n02-01.htm Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Dr. Haris Habib; Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan; E-mail: drharishabib@yahoo.com Paper publication: 06 April 2011
124 Prevalence and Factors Associated with eedle Stick Injuries among Registered urses in Public Sector Tertiary Care Hospitals of Pakistan Haris Habib (1) *, Ejaz Ahmed Khan (1), Anwar Aziz (2) (1) Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan (2) Principal State School of Nursing, Mirpur, AJK, Pakistan * Corresponding author; Email: drharishabib@yahoo.com ABSTRACT Background: Needle stick injuries remain the main cause of Hep B, Hep C and HIV which lead to mortality and morbidity in health care providers especially in nurses all over the world. Although needle stick injuries have been well studied in developed countries, data from developing countries is limited. Aim & Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of needle stick injuries among nurses and its associated factors in public sector tertiary care hospitals of Pakistan. Methods: This cross sectional survey was conducted in 3 major tertiary care hospitals of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Study duration was from March 2010 to May 2010 (3 months). Two Hundred and Sixteen (216) nurses were selected by simple random sampling with proportionate sampling. All those registered nurses who were working in allied hospitals of Rawalpindi and involved in clinical work were included, while all those who were on administrative positions, students, retired or on maternity leave were excluded from the study. Pre structured questionnaire was used and data was collected by questionnaire having optional choices and few open ended questions. The questionnaire was piloted among thirty nurses in a tertiary care hospital and their comments were incorporated accordingly to redesign the final questionnaire. The data was analysed using SPSS 16. Results: Sixty Seven (67%) of nurses got needle stick injury during job. Almost all (99%) nurses said that they didn t report their injury because of no reporting system in their hospital (p value < 0.05). Injection and needles (72%) are the most injury causing instrument and needle stick injuries mostly occurred (81%) at bedside and ward (p value < 0.05)). Sixty six percent (66%) of nurses said that they didn t attended any educational session, seminar or workshop related to needle stick injuries during their job. Conclusion: The frequency of needle stick injuries among nurses is quite high in public sector hospitals of Rawalpindi Pakistan. Non-reporting and less health education are the main factors leading to needle stick injuries. Keywords: Prevalence, Needle stick injuries, Public sector hospitals, Registered nurses, Pakistan
125 Introduction Accidental exposure to blood borne diseases through needle stick injuries (NSI) is very common among health care workers. They are more prone to hospital acquired transmission of blood pathogens via contaminated needles. 1 Almost 90 % of all the needle stick injuries occurred in nurses of third world countries where there is lack of knowledge, resources and training. 2 2 millions Needle stick injuries are reported in health care providers every year. 3 But these are only the reported cases and about 40-70% cases of needle stick injuries are unreported in developing countries. 3 A European survey of Needle stick injury found that nurses (91%) are the main group among health care providers who are more exposed to needle stick injuries as compared to doctors and phlebotomist. 4 Needle stick injuries may increase hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission risk in the healthcare workers and the most vulnerable group is nurses. 5-9 According to the World Health Organization, 16000 Hepatitis C (HCV), 66000 Hepatitis B (HBV) and 1000 cases of HIV may have occurred worldwide in the year 2000 among health care worker especially nurses through their exposure to needle stick injuries. 1 According to World Health Organisation (WHO) regional classification. Pakistan comes in Eastern Mediterranean Region D (EMR D). Unfortunately this region has the highest rate of needle stick injuries as compared to the entire world. 10 An Indian study also showed that most of the needle stick injuries occurred in nurses (45%) among health care worker. 11 This study further reveals that among nurses who got NSI Twenty three (23) were positive for Hepatitis B surface antigen, 15 were positive for HIV and 12 were positive for HCV. The underreporting of NSI events appears to be common within hospital environments; with surveys suggesting that 80% of nurses do not officially report their NSI incidents. 11 Method This cross sectional survey was done in three Public Sector tertiary care hospitals with total bed strength of seventeen hundred and seventy five (1775) from April 2010 to May 2010. Study approval was taken from Institutional Review Board committee of Health Services Academy Islamabad. An informed verbal consent was taken from participants prior to administration of the questionnaire. All those registered nurses who were working in allied hospitals of Rawalpindi during study period involved in clinical work were included in the study. Those nurses who were students, retired, on sick or maternity leave or on administrative position were excluded from the study. A total of two hundred and fifteen (215) nurses participated in the study. A pre structured questionnaire was used as an instrument and some of its parts were modified from international studies on NSI. The questionnaire was piloted among 30 nurses in one of the tertiary care hospitals of Rawalpindi and their comments and suggestions were adjusted accordingly to redesign the final version of the questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of a simple tick box format with few open ended questions and with sections for demographic items, type of device that caused the injury, number of needle stick injuries, causes, training, reporting of injuries, personal protective equipment, working conditions and duty shifts. The data was analysed using SPSS version 16. Frequencies were calculated for all variables which gave the numbers and percentages of responses of all variables. The data was then analysed by using cross tabulation and chi square was applied to find
126 out the association. The significance level was taken as 0.05. Results We have selected two hundred and sixteen (216) participants for the study and all of them participated and filled up the questionnaire. The mean ages of the nurses were 30 +-5 years (see Table 1). Majority of nurses (39%) sustained needle stick injuries more than once, while only twenty five (11%) nurses sustained NSI once in their life (p value< 0.05). Two third (81%) of nurses experienced NSI in ward or bedside whereas only few got NSI in Emergency Room (9%) and Operation Theatre (6%). Needle is the most injury causing instrument (48%) followed by ampoule (18%) and blade (1%). One third (33%) of nurses experienced NSI in morning shift where as other sustained NSI in evening (15%) and night (6%).Almost all the nurses (99.3%) didn t report their injury to hospital administration and 99% of those nurses who didn t report their injury consider absence of reporting system in the hospitals as main cause of non reporting the NSI incidents (p value < 0.05). More than half of nurses (55%) were attending 11-30 patients per day whereas one fifth (20%) of the nurses were attending more than 50 patients Discussion This study is the first to estimate the prevalence of NSI in public sector tertiary care hospitals of Pakistan. Needle stick injuries are a serious problem among health care workers in many countries. All health care providers are at risk of needle stick injuries at their work environment but nurses are at high risk because of their job nature. Many studies have been conducted on nurses, physicians and other technical and sanitary staff regarding needle stick injuries but nurses have highest rates of NSI among them. 12 This is because of having direct contact of nurses with patient and low nurse to patient ratio. In this study a high rate of needle stick injuries among the nursing staff working at a Tertiary Care Hospitals Rawalpindi Pakistan was observed. A total of 67% of the study population had sustained at least one needle stick injury throughout their life. This high prevalence can be compared with other studies in developing countries which show the same trend with different causes according to their local practices. 12,13 But still in Pakistan the rate of NSI is comparatively higher and it might be higher due to the reason that we don t have proper reporting system to have proper surveillance and management strategy. Many published studies reveal that 40-80% of NSI are underreported. 14-16 In our study syringe needle is the major cause of needle stick injuries in nurses (72%).Other studies also stated about needle as major cause of NSI. 16 This fact is because of high injection practices by physicians in health setup. Another study demonstrates that about 26% of nurses using recapping method which might be one of a cause for NSI, Likewise Iranian and Saudi Arabian studies also show high incidence of NSI due to recapping. 17 Majority of nurses sustained needle stick injuries 2-5 times where as only 17% have sustained one injury. An African study revealed 57% sustained NSI more than once. 18 Ward or bedside is another significant predictor towards needle stick injuries in our study. Most of the injuries happened during medication by nurses on bedside or in ward. Smith and Leggat also predicted in their study that ward and bedside is the most common location for needle stick injury to occur 18. In Pakistan s health setup only emergency services are provided after day time in health care facilities which causes high influx of patients in day time for outdoor treatment and
127 this indirectly causes high incidence of needle stick injuries due to heavy workload on nurses. In comparison, developed countries like Japan have the same system and that s why they have the same trend of more needle stick injuries in day time. 18 Due to absence of occupational health departments in public sector tertiary care hospitals, it is very difficult to report the injury to any concerned authority for immediate action and recording keeping. Our study reveals that 99% of nurses didn t report their injury to any concerned authority and they considered non availability of effective reporting system as main cause for that. It is a dilemma that developing country like Pakistan who has very high prevalence of needle stick injuries has no reporting departments in their tertiary care hospitals. If the injury would not be reported than it s very difficult to make any strategy for a problem without knowing its severity and consequences. There is a desperate need for having effective occupational health departments in all health care facilities that will monitor and record such kind of events. Conclusion The study demonstrates a high rate of needle stick injuries among nurses in Pakistan. The strongest risk factor is absence of reporting system in hospitals that s why majority of nurses couldn t report their injury. This study suggested that needle stick injury can be considerably reduced in developing country environment by maintaining a proper occupational health department in hospitals which can report injuries, make recommendations and create awareness regarding any disease or disability due to needle stick injury. Further studies are needed to investigate that how occupational department can work effectively and according to the need of nurses so that they report the injuries conveniently without any hesitation. Acknowledgment We are thankful to all nurses of allied hospitals of Rawalpindi, Pakistan who participated in our study. We are also grateful to the medical and nursing superintendent of allied hospitals, who facilitate us in data collection. References [1] Merchant RC. Update on emerging infections: news from the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated U.S. Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures of HIV and recommendations for post exposure prophylaxis. Ann Emergency Med 2006; 47:492 5. [2] Zafar A, Habib F, Hadwani R et al. Impact of infection control activities on the rate of needle stick injuries at a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan over a period of six years: an observational study. BMC Infectious Diseases 2009; 9 (78). [3] Against all reason: misuse and overuse of injections (online) http://www.who.int/injection_safety/about/resources /Misuse/en/index.html (Accessed at 11.35 am on 22-03-2010). [4] Wilburn S, Eijkamans G. Preventing Needle stick Injuries among Healthcare Workers. INT Journal of Occupational Environmental Health 2004; 10:451 456 [5] Askarian S, Shaghaghian S, Gillen M. Body Fluid Exposure in Nurses of Fars Province. Southern Iran. Arch Iranian Med 2008; 11(5):515 521. [6] Pellissier G, Miguéres B, Tarantola A, et al. Risk of needlestick injuries by injection pens. J Hosp Infect 2006; 63:60 64.
128 [7] SaberiWroozi M, Gholamzadeh S, Serati AR. The long-term immunity among health care workers vaccinated against hepatitisb virus in a large referral hospital in southern Iran. Arch Iran Med 2006; 9(3):204 207 [18] Nsubuga FM, Jaakkola MS. Needle stick injuries in sub-saharan Africa, Journal of Tropical Medicine and International Health 2005;10 (8):773 781. [8] Sadoh WE, Fawole AO, Sadoh AE, Oladimeji AO, Sotiloye OS. Practice of universal precautions among health care workers. J Natl Med Assoc 2006; 98(5):722 726. [9] Smith DR, Wei N, Zhang YJ, Wang RS. Needle stick and sharps injuries among a cross-section of physicians in Mainland China. Am J Ind Med 2006a; 49:169 174. [10] Pruss-Ustun A, Rapiti E, Hutin Y. Estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to contaminated sharps injuries among health-care workers. Am J Ind Med 2005; 48(6):482 90. [11] Mehta A, Rodrigues C, Ghag S, Bavi P, Shenai S, Dastur F. Needlestick injuries in a tertiary care centre in Mumbai, India. J Hosp Infect. 2005 Aug; 60(4):368-73. [12] Knight VM, Bodsworth NJ. Perceptions and practice of universal blood and body fluid precautions by registered nurses at a major Sydney teaching hospital. Journal of Advanced ursing 1998; 27: 746 751. [13] Judith S.C. Shiao, Ming-Siou Lin. National Incidence of Percutaneous. Injury in Taiwan Healthcare Workers. Research in Nursing & Health, 2008; 31:172 179. [14] D Haiduve, S simpkins et al.percutanious injury reportig in public teaching hospital. J hosp Inf. 1999; 41:151-154. [15] Osborn EHS, Papadakis MA,Gerberding GL. Occupational exposure to body fluids among medical students. A seven years longitudinal study. Ann Itern Med 1999; 130(1):45-51. [16] Smith DR, Smyth W, Leggat PA, Wang RS. Needle stick and sharps injuries among nurses in a tropical Australian hospital. International Journal of Nursing Practice.2006; 12: 71 77. [17] Jahan S. Epidemiology of needle sticks injuries among health care workers in a secondary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 2005; 25(3):233-238.
129 Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of the Participants (N=216) Description umber % Percentages Age Up to 30 years 31-40 years 41-50 years More than 50 years 136 40 30 10 63 18.5 13.9 4.6 Marital Status Single Married Widowed Experience 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 16-20 years More than 20 years 94 120 2 107 34 24 23 28 43.5 55.6 0.9 49.5 15.7 11.1 10.6 13 Figure 1: Pie Chart showing the most common procedure causing Needle Stick Injuries among nurses
130 Figure 2: Bar graph showing factors associated with Needle stick Injuries among nurses.