LSSCC Action Period 1: Composite Score Reports June 25, 2015

Similar documents
Nursing Home Walk of Fame Visiting What Really Works. Call in Number

HSAG the QIN-QIO NHQCC II and CDI Initiative Kick-off

New York State Department of Health 2016 Nursing Home Quality Initiative Methodology

Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Ratings of Nursing Homes Provider Rating Report

Leveraging Your Facility s 5 Star Analysis to Improve Quality

QAPI: Driving Quality or Just Driving You Crazy

Agenda: Noon Overview of the regulatory sections affected by the Reform of RoP in Phase 2

Leading and Sustaining Systemic Change Collaborative: Overview

Quality Measures and the Five-Star Rating

11/23/2011. Proactive vs. Reactive Relationship

10/22/2015. QIO Program Restructures. QIO Program Restructures ANHA Activities/Social Services Convention Person-Centered Care

Quality Outcomes and Data Collection

Kentucky Nursing Home Collaborative Action Period 1. Scott Gibson, Quality Improvement Advisor

Session #: R14. Robin L. Hillier. Agenda 4/9/2014. Simply Quality Measures. (330) RLH Consulting.

FH16 - Developed by Polaris Group Page 1 of 140

QM, 5 Star, VBP: Taking the Confusion Out of All the Reports and the Impact of QMs on Reimbursement Presented for WHCA

Session Objectives. Long Term Care Luncheon: The CMS Five-Star Quality Rating System. Quality Ratings of U.S. Nursing Homes on Nursing Home Compare

Understanding the New MDS 3.0 Quality Measures. Updated May 2017

CMS Announced Changes On Feb 12 th CMS s Open Door Forum conference call

UNDERSTANDING THE NEW MDS 3.0 QUALITY MEASURES

Nursing Home Quality Initiative (NHQI) HMM, CPAs LLP HMM Consulting, A Division of HMM, CPAs LLP February 17, 2016

UNDERSTANDING THE NEW MDS 3.0 QUALITY MEASURES

Learning Session 2 for the Ohio Nursing Home Quality Care Collaborative II (NHQCC II) and the Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Initiative

MDS Coding. Antipsychotic Quality Measure

Quality Measures Are My Friends

FACT SHEET A CONSUMER GUIDE TO CHOOSING A NURSING HOME DO YOUR HOMEWORK FIRST, EXPLORE ALTERNATIVES

Understanding the Five Star Quality Rating System Design For Nursing Home Compare

National Nursing Home Quality Care Collaborative Participation Agreement

SUMMARY OF THE CHANGES TO FIVE STAR ANNOUNCED BY CMS. Mark Parkinson AHCA/NCAL President & CEO All member call February 13 th, 2015

AHCA Requests to CMS

Community Data Update Knoxville Community Readmissions Coalition January 25 th, 2018

Disclaimer. Learning Objectives

Maggie Turner RN RAC-CT Kara Schilling RN RAC-CT Lisa Gourley RN RAC-CT

AHCA NURSING HOME PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM STUDY

Attachment C: Itemized List of OASIS Data Elements

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Quality Measures (QM) & Five Star Rating System. Objectives 4/18/2016 MDS CODING FOR QUALITY MEASURES

OASIS-B1 and OASIS-C Items Unchanged, Items Modified, Items Dropped, and New Items Added.

HOW PROCESS MEASURES ARE CALCULATED

QUALITY INCENTIVE POINTS OHIO. Mandy Smith Regulatory Director Ohio Health Care Association

US Health Health Policy

MEASURING POST ACUTE CARE OUTCOMES IN SNFS. David Gifford MD MPH American Health Care Association Atlantic City, NJ Mar 17 th, 2015

Improving Nursing Home Compare for Consumers. Five-Star Quality Rating System

New Survey Focus MDS Accuracy and Staffing -Compliance Risk Alert-

Restorative Nursing: The NHA s Role and Organizational Outcomes

MDS 3.0/RUG IV OVERVIEW

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide. February 2015

HOW HOME HEALTH COMPARE ITEMS ARE CALCULATED

Learning Objectives. QAPI at a Glance: 8/22/16. Achieving Success with QAPI. Participants will be able to describe:

Adult Family Homes. Susan L. Lakey, PharmD Pharmacy 492 January 24, 2005

Methodology Report U.S. News & World Report Nursing Home Finder

Attachment A - Comparison of OASIS-C (Current Version) to OASIS-C1 (Proposed Data Collection)

Welcome and thank you for viewing What s your number? Understanding the Long- Stay Urinary Tract Infection Quality Measure. This presentation is one

Preparing for the 2015 QIS Changes in abaqis

QAA/QAPI Meeting Agenda Guide

Infection Control Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) Case Study Scenario 1: Following Quality Assurance (QA)

Policy Brief. Nurse Staffing Levels and Quality of Care in Rural Nursing Homes. rhrc.umn.edu. January 2015

Design for Nursing Home Compare 5-Star Rating System: Users Guide

2017 Long-Term Care Quality Improvement Program (QIP) Program Description & Measurement Specifications

Infection Control Performance Improvement Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) Case Study

DATA ACCURACY A KEY FACTOR FOR SUCCESSFUL OPERATIONS

CLINICAL REIMBURSEMENT ESSENTIALS FOR LEADERS Using your SNF data. David Rokes, RN C.E.O. Post Acute Consulting, LLC

HH Compare. IMPACT Act. Measure HHVBP

Telligen. Making BIG Changes Attainable with Affinity Group Outreach June 3, 2016

Understanding Your Quality Measures. Craig Bettles Data Visualization Manager Consonus Healthcare

Selected Measures United States, 2011

CMS s RAI Version 3.0 Manual October 2016

WHAT S IN THE STARS FOR YOUR FACILITY

A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO SURVEY PREPARATION

OASIS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT REPORTS

Telligen Update. Colorado s Medicare Quality Innovation Network- Quality Improvement Organization Christine LaRocca, MD.

Nurse Staffing and Quality in Rural Nursing Homes

The Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting Program. Overview. Legislative Mandate. Anne Deutsch, RN, PhD, CRRN

Maximize the Value of Your Data with LTC Trend Tracker. Peggy Connorton, MS LNFA Director, Quality and LTC Trend Tracker

Patient Identifiers: Facial Recognition Patient Address DOB (month/day year) / / UHHC. Month Day Year / / Month Day Year

FLORIDA NURSING HOME PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT Working Group Recommendations

LTC Five-Star Rating System

6/29/2015. Focused Survey for MDS Assessment. Objectives: Review the results of the MDS pilot study.

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

Nursing Home Pearls or

RYTES COMPANY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW

Discharge to Community Measure

Clinical Intervention Overview: Objectives

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

MDS 3.0: What Leadership Needs to Know

LTCH Lay of the Land: Reporting the LTCH CARE Data Set. July 30, 2012

Quality Measurement in Skilled Nursing Facilities Five Star Rating System

JudyWilhide.com (c) 1

Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Intervention Kick-Off Webinar

NOTE: New Hampshire rules, to

Maximizing the Power of Your Data. Peggy Connorton, MS, LNFA AHCA Director, Quality and LTC Trend Tracker

LTCH Lay of the Land: Reporting the LTCH CARE Data Set (2 of 3) August 21, 2012

QUALITY MEASURES FOR POST ACUTE CARE. David Gifford MD MPH American Health Care Association Worcester, MA Nov 13, 2014

3/12/2015. Session Objectives. RAI User s Manual. Polling Question

January 2017 A GUIDE TO HOME HEALTH VALUE-BASED PURCHASING

Value-based incentive payment percentage 3

Basic Training: Home Health Edition. OASIS and Outcomes. April 2, 2013

DETAIL SPECIFICATION. Description. Numerator. Denominator. Exclusions. Minimum Data Reported to NHSN

Transcription:

LSSCC Action Period 1: Composite Score Reports June 25, 2015

The National Nursing Home Quality Care Collaborative (NNHQCC) Composite Measure! Composite Measure tool used to help monitor NNHQCC progress not intended to replace or supersede existing local or federal initiatives, including the 5-star rating system another way to look at quality from a systems perspective! NNHQCC nursing homes focus on processes that improve their systems measure individual tests of change! Processes and tools include Performing RCA with PIPs

Composite Score Calculation! Based on the opportunity model concept numerators and denominators are summed across all 13 quality measures to determine the composite numerator and denominator! Composite numerator divided by the composite denominator and multiplied by 100 results in the composite score

13 Long-Stay Quality Measures Percent of 1. Residents with one or more falls with major injury 2. Residents with a urinary tract infection (UTI) 3. Residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 4. High-risk residents with pressure ulcers 5. Low-risk residents with loss of bowel or bladder control 6. Residents with catheter inserted or left in bladder 7. Residents physically restrained

13 Long-Stay Quality Measures (cont.) Percent of 8. Residents whose need for help with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) has increased 9. Residents who lose too much weight 10. Residents who have depressive symptoms 11. Residents who received antipsychotic medications 12. Residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine 13. Residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine

Vaccine Measures! Since the two vaccination measures are directionally opposite (i.e., higher rate represents better performance), the composite numerator for these two measures is denominator minus numerator.! Interpreted as lower missed opportunities = better

Polling Question: What would this facility s composite score be with the following composite numerator and composite denominator? N: 60 D: 600 1. 20 2. 10 3. 5

Composite Score Goal! The fewer missed opportunities in providing exceptional care, the lower the composite score.! Focusing quality improvement (QI) initiatives on areas with higher number of missed opportunities reduces the overall composite score. GOAL

An Example: Loving Our Residents Health and Rehab (LORHR)! Overall composite of 12.22! Missed opportunities, ranked from highest to lowest:! Composite Numerator: 158! Composite Denominator: 1293! Composite Score = 158/1293 = 12.22

Composite Score: Before Vaccination Improvement 35 30 30 Number of Missed Opportuni:es 29 Composite Score 32 28 25 20 15 Composite Score 12.22 13 10 9 5 0 1 4 4 3 1 0 4

Improving the Composite Score Focus on low hanging fruit! If LORHR would address giving immunizations in a timely manner, they could easily reduce their composite to 10.90! For example, if they reduced the missed opportunities Flu vaccination from 28 to 14 Pneu vaccination from 9 to 6 Composite Numerator will decrease by 17 (from 158 to 141)! Composite Score = 141/1293 = 10.90

Composite Score: After Vaccination Improvement 35 30 30 Number of Missed Opportuni:es 29 Composite Score 32 25 20 15 Composite Score 10.90 13 14 10 5 0 1 4 4 3 1 0 4 6

Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI)! Next focus area at LORHR use of off-labeled antipsychotic medications! Missed opportunity score = 32! First step to improvement Perform a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) with Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs)

QAPI RCA Guidance Available online at: atomalliance.org/download/guidance-for-rca/

Performing an RCA with PIPs 1. Identify the event/issue to be investigated and gather preliminary information 2. Charter and select team facilitator and team members 3. Describe what happened or the issue 4. Identify the contributing factors 5. Identify root causes 6. Design and implement changes to eliminate root causes 7. Celebrate successes

Composite Score: Before Drug Reduction 35 30 30 Number of Missed Opportuni:es 29 Composite Score 32 25 20 15 Composite Score 10.90 13 14 10 5 0 1 4 4 3 1 0 4 6

RCA Findings LORHR s root causes for the high use of antipsychotic medications: 17 of the 32 residents admitted with medications; several gradual dose reductions were successful and the medications no longer needed but not discontinued Discontinuing the medication will decrease the numerator by 17 7 of the residents received the proper diagnosis of Schizophrenia (excluded from denominator) 5 residents discharged to a more appropriate healthcare facility (excluded from denominator)

Results LORHR reduced the missed opportunities as follows: Composite Numerator decrease by 24 (from 32 to 8) Composite Denominator decrease by 12 (from 1293 to 1281) Composite Score = 117/1281 = 9.13

Composite Score: After Drug Reduction 35 Number of Missed Opportuni:es Composite Score 30 30 29 25 20 15 10 5 0 Composite Score 9.13 1 4 4 3 1 0 13 4 8 14 6

Overall Improvement in Care Addressing one focus area can cause changes in another; i.e., eliminating the use of off-labeled antipsychotic medications can reduce the number of falls improve resident mobility, alertness and appetite reduce the risk of pressure ulcers The composite score is steadily moving toward the goal:

Composite Score: After Drug Reduction 35 Number of Missed Opportuni:es Composite Score 30 30 29 25 20 15 10 Composite Score 9.13 13 8 14 5 0 1 4 4 3 1 0 4 6

Composite Score: Impact of Drug Reduction 35 Number of Missed Opportuni:es Composite Score 30 25 25 20 20 15 13 8 14 10 5 0 Composite Score 7.57 1 2 2 3 1 ADL Pain PrUlcers WtLoss Incont Cath UTI Depr Restr Falls An:Psych Flu Pneu 0 2 6

Facility Share: Jefferson County Nursing Home, MS Sandra Sampson Director of Nursing

Facility Share: Jefferson County Nursing Home, TN Samantha Snapp, RN Director of Nursing

Facility Share: Harber-Laman Management, TN jj Jennifer Brown Corporate QAPI Coordinator

July 23 rd : Clinical Educational Webinar! MDS! Composite Data! Incontinence and ADL QMs

atom Alliance C.2 Team liz.prosch@area-g.hcqis.org beth.greene@area-g.hcqis.org kathy.hybarger@area-g.hcqis.org kara.dawson@area-g.hcqis.org beth.hercher@area-g.hcqis.org julie.clark@area-g.hcqis.org scott.gibson@area-g.hcqis.org Mae.mcDaniel@area-G.hcqis.org