EXPLORATORY RESEARCH PROJECTS Code: PN-II-ID-PCE PRESENTATION

Similar documents
Horizon Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions. Education and Culture

EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL FUNDS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH

Annex 3. Horizon H2020 Work Programme 2016/2017. Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

NILS SCIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMME CALL FOR PROPOSALS ABEL INDIVIDUAL MOBILITY (ABEL-IM-2013) ABEL COORDINATED MOBILITY (ABEL-MC-2013)

CAPACITIES WORK PROGRAMME PART 3. (European Commission C (2011) 5023 of 19 July 2011) REGIONS OF KNOWLEDGE

PEOPLE Programme Marie Curie Actions FP7

ERC THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH COUNCIL

RESEARCH FUNDING: SECURING SUPPORT PROPOSAL FOR YOUR PROJECT THROUGH A FUNDING. Professor Bryan Scotney

FIRST TEAM PROGRAMME EVALUATION FORM FOR REVIEWERS

FP7: Marie Curie Actions

FP6. Specific Programme: Structuring the European Research Area. Work Programme. Human Resources and Mobility

Physiotherapist Registration Board

2018 Call for Projects on ALS Research

National Science Centre Funding basic research

Transnational Joint Call on Research and Innovation Year XXX

SPECIFIC PRIVACY STATEMENT ERCEA ERC- Proposals Evaluation, Grants Management and Follow-up

DEMENTIA GRANTS PROGRAM DEMENTIA AUSTRALIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION PROJECT GRANTS AND TRAINING FELLOWSHIPS

European Research Council. Alex Berry, European Advisor 15 December 2015, Royal Holloway

ERC Grant Schemes. Horizon 2020 European Union funding for Research & Innovation

Frequently Asked Questions

Main Changes Expected in the ERC Work Programme 2019

Health Research 2017 Call for Proposals Rules for Participation

Guideline for Research Programmes Rules for the establishment and implementation of programmes falling under the Programme Area Research

The European Research Council. FP7 IDEAS Programme. Yuriy Zaytsev National Research University Higher School of Economics

ERA-NET ERA-NET. Cooperation and coordination of national or regional research and innovation activities (i.e. programmes)

HORIZON 2020 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

ISSI/ISSI-BJ Joint Call for Proposals 2018 for International Teams in Space and Earth Sciences

FP7 IDEAS The European Research Council

Call text. The Programme supports 6 fellows working on projects of a duration up to 36 months recruited in the current call for proposals.

European Research Council Consolidator Grants

III. The provider of support is the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (hereafter just TA CR ) seated in Prague 6, Evropska 2589/33b.

Marie Curie Actions. individual Fellowships. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 17 May 2012

JOINT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TEMPLATE

ModSim. Computational Mathematics. Developing New Applications of Modelling and Simulation for Austrian Business and Research

Participating in the 7th Community RTD Framework Programme. Athens 28/2/07 SSH Information Day

The French National Research Agency (ANR)

ERC Advanced Grant Specific Provisions and Funding Rates. Extract from the ERC Work Programme

A QUICK GUIDE TO MARIE CURIE ACTIONS 2010

Call title: Science in Society 2013

European Research Council & Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

The IDEAS Work Programme

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Interim Process and Methods of the Highly Specialised Technologies Programme

Call for Applications. Templeton Independent Research Fellowship: The Power of Information

3 - Short Term Scientific Mission (STSM)

Fit for Health. Horizon 2020 in a nutshell. Support to SMEs & Researchers in FP7 Health-oriented projects. 5 th September 2013 Bucharest

Southern California NIOSH Education and Research Center (SCERC): Guidelines for Pilot Project Research Training Program Grant Applicants (FY 2017/18)

Funding Opportunities in Horizon 2020 Focus on PhD candidates and postdocs

THE SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME (FP7)

2018 Request for Applications for the following two grant mechanisms Target Identification in Lupus Program & Novel Research Grant Program

Ontario College of Trades

CAPACITIES PROVISIONAL 1 WORK PROGRAMME 2007 PART 2. (European Commission C(2006) 6849) RESEARCH FOR THE BENEFIT OF SMES

The European Research Council

ERC funding opportunities

Additional Feasibility Studies for Combining HBM and Health studies. First Internal Call for WP3 2018

Programme Document for the COMET Competence Centre Programme

Important dates. Contact Persons Ir. Annette Bastiaens /

AII IRELAND INSTITUTE OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE / IRISH CANCER SOCIETY RESEARCH POSTDOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP Guidance Notes

The IDEAS Work Programme

Public Service of Wallonia

"ERA-NET Plus Actions"

SEAI Research Development and Demonstration Funding Programme Budget Policy. Version: February 2018

The ERC funding strategy

RULES & REGULATIONS FIR-PRI Award Finance and Sustainability European Academic Research 13 th edition

Stroke in Young Adults Funding Opportunity for Mid- Career Researchers. Guidelines for Applicants

EUCERD RECOMMENDATIONS QUALITY CRITERIA FOR CENTRES OF EXPERTISE FOR RARE DISEASES IN MEMBER STATES

Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA)

Guide for Writing a Full Proposal

Architecture and the City, Modus and Experiment: Public building / public realm, composition & tectonics

1. MARIE CURIE CARRIER INTEGRATION GRANTS (CIG)

Health Education England Genomics Education Programme. Fellowship Scheme Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

UGC UKIERI Call for Research Proposals

The Danish Council for Strategic Research. a presentation

Strategic Japanese-Swiss Science and Technology Program (SJSSTP) Joint Research Projects: Call for Proposals 2018

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions HORIZON 2020

The budget for this call is indicative. The final budget awarded to actions implemented through the call for proposals may vary:

PEOPLE WORK PROGRAMME (European Commission C(2008)4483 of 22 August 2008)

BARD Research Proposals Guidelines and Regulations for Applicants

European Research Council Grants in H2020

Call: Graduate school in energy systems

GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR PLANNING GRANTS WITHIN THE DEMO ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME

MRC/DFID Call for Proposals: Implementation research for improved adolescent health in low and middle income countries.

Strategic Japanese-Swiss Science and Technology Program (SJSSTP) Joint Research Projects: Call for Proposals 2016

INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS: context, opportunities and the role of the OPIR

MAISON DE L'ECONOMIE EUROPEENNE - RUE JACQUES DE LALAINGSTRAAT 4 - B-1040 BRUXELLES

Investing in future. Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions current situation and future perspectives

Request for Research Proposals Rhode Island Sea Grant Research Omnibus

Call title: "The Ocean of Tomorrow 2013"

RFP for CHSS 2018 Faculty Summer Research Grant Program

ERC Work Programme 2008

Annex 3. Horizon Work Programme Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions

Belmont Forum Collaborative Research Action:

DEPARTMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY MINISTRY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

Application Instructions

Research Funding Guide

PROCEDURE COURTESY TRANSLATION

DBT-MRC Joint Centre Partnerships Call. How to apply to the UK Medical Research Council

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY VICE-CHANCELLOR (RESEARCH, PRODUCTION AND EXTENSION)

BARD Research Proposals Guidelines and Regulations for Applicants. (Updated: July 2014) Table of Contents

Guidance Notes for preparing the Grant Agreement

Joint Israel-UK Research in Cyber Security

Transcription:

EXPLORATORY RESEARCH PROJECTS Code: PN-II-ID-PCE-2007-2 PRESENTATION Goal: The Exploratory Research Projects have as main goal the development of the knowledge/ knowledge broadening in all the research domains, including the socio-human sciences, both by fundamental research and by advanced research in order to solve complex issues, of frontier, by obtaining new knowledge regarding processes and phenomena, by formulating and validating original suppositions, concept models and theories. Derived objectives: 1. promotion of original research and increase of research capacity, with favourable implications on the international competitiveness of the Romanian research. 2. increase of full-time researchers financed through research projects, as well as funding of PhD positions, encouraging/promoting researchers formation in an environment of high scientific quality. 3. increase of the Romanian research visibility on international level, especially European, by increasing the quality and the better knowledge transfer. Eligibility criteria: 1. project director is doctor of science 2. project director has a full time labour contract, during the whole project, in a high education or research institution, without age limit; 3. costs of the applicative research activities (if existing) do not exceed 10 % from the total budget of the project proposal 4. the host institution of the project is registered and validated in the Register of Potential Contractors and is framed in the research definition, pursuant to the Communitary Framework for State Aid (C323/2006) 5. a project director can, at some point, be granted funding for only one project of this kind. Duration: 36 months

Budget: The financial support granted for a project of this type, during its all period, is of 1.000.000 lei maximum. Eligible costs: staff expenses, in accordance with the present law, at the paying dates (including employer expenses) a maximum of 60 % from the project budget indirect expenses (overheads) If the project proposal is selected for funding, the chapter indirect expenses for the budget cannot be modified in plus, in the initial phase or during the project. The nonnon-compliance with this stipulation can lead to funding stop. logistics expenses, necessary for the project development (equipment, laboratory materials, material expenses, dissemination, informing-documentation access to the research infrastructure) expenses for mobilities (documentation and research stages within the country and abroad, participations in national and international scientific events) The scheme for the project expenses, shared on activities, destinations and categories must comply with provisions of the G.D.1579/2002. Structure of the research team: The project research team may include a number of maximum 6 people (including the project director), being formed of: - a project coordinator ( principal investigator ), doctor of science, with a international scientific activity; - experimented researchers, post PhD, if possible; - early stage researchers, PhD young students, if possible. When the project proposal is submitted, the whole research team can be named or the positions for the early stage researchers can be free, but their role within the research team is emphasized. Other recommendations:

During the project evaluation, important factors will be: the coordinator s proved scientific performance, as well as the one belonging to the experimented researchers, members of the research team. The scientific quality and the novelty degree of the project proposal will be appreciated, new approaches being encouraged, even with big scientific risk, but with a potential of producing special results. The following will also be taken into account: the research environment, the existing research infrastructure, as well as the access to the l research facilities, critical for the project s success. The projects which approach new research themes with international collaboration are stimulated. This project does not encourage investments in infrastructure; what is encouraged is the way the projects refer to the use of the existing infrastructure and/or other funding sources for its consolidation. Evaluation and selection procedures of the project proposals The submitted of the project proposals is made in a single stage, and they are written according to the funding form (application form in Romanian and in English). The steps of the evaluation process: 1. Eligibility check: The received project proposals are checked by the UEFISCSU staff, in order to make sure that all criteria for the administrative eligibility are met 2. Peer-view evaluation: Each project proposal which is considered eligible is evaluated from the scientific quality taking into account the scientific quality, by 3 independent experts, validated by CNCSIS, who will give grades, according to the evaluation form. The grades are justified by summative commentaries, emphasizing the weak and the strong points. If the 3 evaluations give grades with more than 10 points difference, the panel evaluation is made, with all 3 evaluators. These re-evaluate together the initial evaluations establishing the scores for each evaluation criterion and the final score. If the initial panel does not reach a consensus, the project proposal is evaluated by another panel of evaluators. If the difference is not bigger than 10 points, the final grade is established as an average between the 3 given grades. 3. Feedback: The directors of the projects are announced about the results of the evaluations, each applicant receiving, by email, the final evaluation report or

the evaluation form together with the grades and the commentaries belonging to those 3 evaluators, if there was not a difference bigger than 10 points between the three evaluations. 4. Notices: The project directors can make complaints regarding the procedure errors. 5. Funding: For each specialized domain (mathematics, IT, physics, medicine etc.) depending on the scores, a top of the domain is made. The list of the proposals selected for funding is settled taking into account the received scores, the allocated budget and the funding rate. The evaluations are anonymous, confidentiality and impartiality being assured If the project director applied more than one project proposal, within this funding instrument, for the same competition, and the proposals reach the settled/established score for funding/are eligible for funding, the project director has to/must choose a single project proposal to be funded. The main obligations of the parties/the parties main obligations: Host institution: 1. announces the funding agency about any modification regarding the project director according to the specifications from the eligibility criteria; 2. supports the project director with the project implementation. Project director: 1. sends the funding agency the requested reports, at the right time and layout; 2. annually, he writes a self-evaluation report which will be presented in public within a framework established by the funding agency; 3. fulfils the expected minimum performance criterion (for a project exploratory research type, the minimum performance criterion is represented by the number of the articles accepted to be published in ISI journals /international data bases; the number of articles must be the same with the number of experimented researchers from the project team); 4. presents transparently the way in which the research positions have been funded; 5. advertises the activities and announces the vacant positions within the research project (including on the site: www.mct.ro/jobs);

6. brings to date the resumes belonging to the team members in the portal: www.cercetatori-romani.ro; 7. during the funding contract, the project director is registered in the National Register of Evaluators, having as main duty to bring to date the CV as evaluator and to participate in the evaluation process, when the funding agency requires, during the project development, in agreement, respecting the conflict of interests; 8. designs and brings the project web page to date, in Romanian and English. Funding Agency: 1. assures a continuous funding, depending on the fulfilling of the performance criteria; 2. decides if the project will be continued/will continue if the status of the project director is changed/modified; 3. puts at disposal the portal: www.cercetatori-romani.ro; 4. assures the access to the specific support instruments for mobility, in order to present the accepted papers in international conferences abroad. The institution the project director is part of, with the signatures of the authorised persons (rector/director, economic director/chief accountant) and with the signature belonging to the project director, certifies, on its own responsibility, the legality and correctness of the information within the funding application, the acceptance of project development within institutional frame. The resources mentioned in the funding application, the commitment to support the project development in good orders. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Basic research activity having as main goal to gain new knowledge regarding processes and phenomena, as well as hypothesis enunciation and check, conceptual methods and theories. Applied research activity having as main goal to use the scientific knowledge for the improvement and design of new products, technologies and services. Inter-disciplinary research involves different disciplines in a way that stimulates the tendency to exceed the disciplinary bounds in order to create new knowledge within the process of solving specific issues. These disciplines have different research paradigms as basis, and yet they work together in order to create new knowledge. The new theories and

knowledge are the result of a joint research effort, and they will not represent a monopoly within a certain discipline, but integrated results. Trans-disciplinary research involves projects in with contributions from scientific researchers, as well as other participants, like managers and even public representatives. These have a mutual research goal and contribute to the creation of new theories and knowledge. This kind of research combines inter - disciplinary with participative approach. Unlike inter- disciplinary, which gathers different scientific expertises, transdisciplinary research gathers within the research activity also participants outside the academic field. Frontier research has as goal to create and develop new knowledge and instruments. Frontier research does not take into account the disciplinary bounds. It may involve multi-, inter-, or trans-disciplinary research, which reunites researchers with complementary disciplinary skills using techniques, methodologies and instruments which are different from the conceptual point of view. Experienced researcher researcher who is doctor of science in his field, in post PhD stage, or immediately after its ending. Early stage researcher person who has a formal background which enables him to be part of a PhD programme or if he is PhD student.