Baseline and 9-Month Follow-Up Outcomes of Health Care for Iowa Medicaid Health Home Program Enrollees

Similar documents
Outcomes for Iowa Medicaid Chronic Condition Health Home Program Enrollees. Policy Report. SFYs February 2017

Outcomes for Iowa Medicaid Health Home Program Enrollees

Cost Analyses of the Iowa Medicaid Health Home Program

Experiences of Iowa Medicaid Health Home Enrollees (Program Period )

First Look at Iowa's Medicaid Expansion: How Well Did Members Transition to the Iowa Health & Wellness Plan from IowaCare

Fast Facts 2018 Clinical Integration Performance Measures

Community Performance Report

State FY2013 Hospital Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Guide

MEDICARE ENROLLMENT, HEALTH STATUS, SERVICE USE AND PAYMENT DATA FOR AMERICAN INDIANS & ALASKA NATIVES

and HEDIS Measures

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Molina Healthcare has defined the following goals for the QI Program:

Quality Measurement Approaches of State Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Programs

Tips for PCMH Application Submission

South Dakota Health Homes Care Coordination Innovation

ILLINOIS 1115 WAIVER BRIEF

Nevada County Health and Human Services FY14 Rural Health Care Services Outreach Grant Project Evaluation Report June 30, 2015

Enhancing Outcomes with Quality Improvement (QI) October 29, 2015

MONROE COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

Quality: Finish Strong in Get Ready for October 28, 2016

Dual Eligibles: Medicaid s Role in Filling Medicare s Gaps

Total Cost of Care Technical Appendix April 2015

Integration Workgroup: Bi-Directional Integration Behavioral Health Settings

CHEMUNG COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

Carolinas Collaborative Data Dictionary

Best Practices. SNP Alliance. October 2013 Commonwealth Care Alliance: Best Practices in Care for Frail and Disabled Medicare Medicaid Enrollees

STEUBEN COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

Understanding Risk Adjustment in Medicare Advantage

LIVINGSTON COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

Communicator. the JUST A THOUGHT. Ensuring HEDIS-Compliant Preventive Health Services. Provider Portal Features. Peer-to-Peer Review BY DR.

Utilizing a Pharmacist and Outpatient Pharmacy in Transitions of Care to Reduce Readmission Rates. Disclosures. Learning Objectives

Meaningful Use FAQs for Behavioral Health

ONTARIO COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

CMHC Healthcare Homes. The Natural Next Step

ALL MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER PROGRAMS MUST INCLUDE PSYCHOSOCIAL AND PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATIONS

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

ProviderReport. Managing complex care. Supporting member health.

Inappropriate Primary Diagnosis Codes Policy

Access to Psychiatric Inpatient Care: Prolonged Waiting Periods in Medical Emergency Departments. Data Report for

Florida Medicaid: Performance Measures (HEDIS)

Improve Your Revenue for the Services Your Provide with Proper Coding and Documentation. by Christina Rock, BSN, RN Supervisor, Clinical Education

STEUBEN COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE

Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues March 28 30, 2012 Robert A. Pelaia, JD, CPC

=======================================================================

Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations in Tennessee, Final Report. May 2006

Improving Service Delivery for Medicaid Clients Through Data Integration and Predictive Modeling

Gateway to Practitioner Excellence GPE 2017 Medicaid & Medicare

OASIS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT REPORTS

2016 Embedded and Rapid Response Care Management

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

INSTITUTIONAL/INSTITUTIONAL EQUIVALENT (I/IESNP) DUAL SPECIAL NEEDS PLAN (DSNP) CHRONIC SPECIAL NEEDS PLAN (LSNP)

Medi-Cal Performance Measurement: Making the Leap to Value-Based Incentives. Dolores Yanagihara IHA Stakeholders Meeting October 3, 2018

Oregon's Health System Transformation

NCQA s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2011 Standards 11/21/11

Chapter 7. Unit 2: Quality Performance Measures

Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield Patient Centered Medical Home Provider Manual

Hot Spotter Report User Guide

PCSP 2016 PCMH 2014 Crosswalk

National Hospice and Palliative Care OrganizatioN. Facts AND Figures. Hospice Care in America. NHPCO Facts & Figures edition

For more information on any of the topics covered, please visit our provider self-service website at

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

OASIS ITEM ITEM INTENT

LA Medicaid Changes to CommunityCARE Program. ***CommunityCARE Providers MUST Respond by January 31, 2011***

An Overview of Ohio s In-Home Service Program For Older People (PASSPORT)

Chapter VII. Health Data Warehouse

Executive Summary MEDICARE FEE-FOR-SERVICE (FFS) HOSPITAL READMISSIONS: QUARTER 4 (Q4) 2012 Q STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Section 2703: State Option to Provide Health Homes for Enrollees with Chronic Conditions

CER Module ACCESS TO CARE January 14, AM 12:30 PM

The Camden Coalition of Healthcare. Management

DELAWARE FACTBOOK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2016 Complex Case Management. Program Evaluation. Our mission is to improve the health and quality of life of our members

Patient Identifiers: Facial Recognition Patient Address DOB (month/day year) / / UHHC. Month Day Year / / Month Day Year

Topic 3B: Documentation Prep for NCQA Recognition Focus on Standards 3, 4, and 1F

HH Compare. IMPACT Act. Measure HHVBP

Health Center Program Update

2017 Catastrophic Care. Program Evaluation. Our mission is to improve the health and quality of life of our members

HouseCalls Objectives

Supplementary Online Content

2012 HEDIS/CAHPS Effectiveness of Care Report for 2011 Measures Oregon Commercial Business

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

North Carolina Ambulatory Surgery Visit Data - Data Dictionary FY2011 Alphabetic List of Variables and Attributes Standard Research File

Oklahoma Health Care Authority. Behavioral Health Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Study

June 25, Shamis Mohamoud, David Idala, Parker James, Laura Humber. AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting

In This Issue. Issue: 8. Codes Utilization FAQs Harry s Health Highlights. Who s Harry? HEDIS News

Facility-Based Behavioral Health Program Professional Fees Reimbursement Policy Annual Approval Date. Approved By

KY Medicaid Co-pays Except for the Pharmacy Non-Preferred co-pay, co-pays do not apply to the following:

Benchmark Data Sources

From Risk Scores to Impactability Scores:

2016 PHYSICIAN QUALITY REPORTING OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES REGISTRY ONLY

HEDIS TOOLKIT FOR PROVIDER OFFICES. A Guide to Understanding Medicaid Measure Compliance

Innovative Ways of Achieving The Triple Aim: Lessons from a Rural Community Health System

KY Medicaid Co-pays. Acute admissions medical Per admission diagnoses $0 Acute health care related to. Per admission substance abuse and/or for

Note: Accredited is the highest rating an exchange product can have for 2015.

AETNA BETTER HEALTH OF ILLINOIS Provider Newsletter June 2017, Vol. 7

Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT)

Center for State Health Policy

Coding Coach Coding Tips

PPS Performance and Outcome Measures: Additional Resources

2) The percentage of discharges for which the patient received follow-up within 7 days after

Understanding Patient Choice Insights Patient Choice Insights Network

Passport Advantage Provider Manual Section 8.0 Quality Improvement

Transcription:

Health Policy 11-1-2013 Baseline and 9-Month Follow-Up Outcomes of Health Care for Iowa Medicaid Health Home Program Enrollees Elizabeth T. Momany University of Iowa Peter C. Damiano University of Iowa Suzanne E. Bentler University of Iowa Copyright 2013 the authors. Hosted by Iowa Research Online. For more information please contact: lib-ir@uiowa.edu.

Policy Report Baseline and 9 month follow-up Outcomes of Health Care for Iowa Medicaid Health Home Program Enrollees Elizabeth T. Momany Peter C. Damiano Suzanne E. Bentler

November 2013 Baseline Outcomes of Health Care for Iowa Medicaid Health Home Program Enrollees Elizabeth T. Momany Assistant Director, Health Policy Research Program Associate Research Scientist Peter C. Damiano Director, Public Policy Center Professor, Preventive & Community Dentistry Suzanne E. Bentler Research Specialist Public Policy Center The University of Iowa 2

Contents Policy Report...1 Key Findings...4 Introduction...5 Eligibility for the Medicaid Health Home Program...5 Provider Network...6 Methodology...7 Demographics...8 Outcome results... 10 3

Key Findings Outpatient visit and emergency department visit rates were lower in the postenrollment period for enrollees in tiers 1-3 but higher for enrollees in tier 4. Hospital readmissions for the same diagnoses within 30 days remained stable from the pre-enrollment to the post-enrollment period with less than 10 readmissions for the same diagnosis in each period. Generally, enrollees had fewer well care and ambulatory care visits with their health home provider in the post-enrollment period. However, enrollees 12-17 years of age had more well care and ambulatory care visits in the postenrollment period. Nursing facility utilization is not compared in this report due to the length of time until claims are adequately adjudicated. 4

Introduction The Iowa Medicaid Health Home incentivizes health care providers in Iowa to offer additional services to Medicaid patients with chronic conditions through a monthly payment tied to the number and severity of the enrollee's chronic condition (Table 1). The Health Home model was authorized under a state plan amendment approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services with enrollment beginning July 1, 2012. Health Home is a specific designation under section 2703 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and is a model of care that provides patient-centered, whole person, coordinated care for all stages of life and transitions of care specifically for individuals with chronic illnesses. For Iowa Medicaid, Health Home practices are enrolled Medicaid provider organizations capable of providing enhanced personal, coordinated care for Medicaid enrollees meeting program eligibility criteria. In return for the enhanced care provided, the Iowa Medicaid Enterprise (IME) offers monthly care coordination payments and the potential for annual performance based incentives designed to improve patient health outcomes and lower overall Medicaid program costs. Additional information about the Iowa Medicaid Health Home is located at http://www.ime.state.ia.us/providers/healthhome.html. Eligibility for the Medicaid Health Home Program To be eligible for the Health Home Medicaid enrollees must have at least two chronic conditions or one chronic condition and be at risk for developing a second condition from the following list: Hypertension Overweight (Adults with a Body Mass Index of 25 or greater/children in the 85 th percentile) Heart Disease Diabetes Asthma Substance Abuse Mental Health Problems In addition, they may not be in IowaCare, PACE, Iowa Family Planning Network, QMB/SLMB, HMO or be a presumptively eligible child or adult. 5

Table 1. Tier definitions Tier Sum of chronic conditions Monthly payment 1 1-3 $12.80 2 4-6 $25.60 3 7-9 $51.21 4 10 or more $76.81 Provider Network Medicaid Health Home enrolled providers include but are not limited to: physician clinics, community mental health centers, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs). Figure 1. Map of the counties with Health Home providers as of October, 2013. (Map: Courtesy of the Iowa Department of Human Services) 6

Methodology A variety of outcomes measures were originally anticipated to determine the effectiveness of Medicaid Health Homes. However, provider, and thereby, recipient enrollment was slow in the program. The original list of outcomes is provided below. Though most of the outcomes measures can be calculated through the administrative data, some are only accessible through Continuity of Care Documents (CCDs) or chart review. Measures marked with an asterisk are attainable through administrative data. Childhood immunization status* Flu shots for adults and children over 6 months of age* Document BMI and appropriate follow-up Comprehensive diabetes care o o Dilated eye exam* Micro albumin* o Proportion with Hemoglobin A1c less than 8 o Proportion with LDL less than 100 Asthma patients with asthma-related emergency department visit* Use of appropriate medications for people with asthma* Percent of patients 5-40 with diagnosis of asthma who have had a visit* Proportion of patients with BP less than 140 systolic and 90 diastolic Systemic antimicrobials* 7 day office follow-up to mental health admission* Clinical depression screening Emergency department utilization* Skilled nursing facility admissions* Hospital readmissions* Outcome measures include stringent inclusion criteria. Claims and enrollment data from enrollees who meet the following criteria may be included in outcomes analyses: 1. Must have no more than a one month gap in enrollment during the measurement period. 2. Must have no more than a one month of enrollment for restricted services programs such as dual eligibility for Medicare or enrollment in Family Planning. 7

3. Must have been enrolled in the Health Home early enough to allow time for claim adjudication ensuring we have at least 95% of claims related to the enrollee's health care. Outcome measures are normally reported for a specific time frame, either a calendar or fiscal year. The Health Home program enrolled individuals on a monthly basis with approximately 300 being enrolled each month. This necessitated a change in outcome calculation. Providers began enrolling eligible Medicaid members into the Health Home program beginning on July 1, 2012. From that time through July 2013, 4,660 Medicaid members were enrolled into the program. In an effort to ensure we had a full complement of data for each enrollee in the outcome analyses over half of these enrollees were removed. 1,758 were removed because of dual eligibility with Medicare, 351 were removed because they were not eligible for at least 11 months during the previous year, 28 were removed because they were over 64 and their Medicare eligibility was unclear, and 487 were removed because they became eligible after May 1, 2013. Removing individuals who became eligible for Medicare during the 9 months following enrollment into the health home, resulted in a final study population of 898 individuals with full enrollment and claims during the period 1 year prior to enrollment through 9 months post enrollment. Demographics The full population of 4,460 enrollees included 4,143 (89%) and 517 children (11%). Of those enrollees, most (45%) were eligible through Supplemental Security Income (SSI) due to a disability in addition to limited income. Of the remaining 55%, 29% were income eligible, 16% were in the Medicaid Buy-Out (Medicaid for Employed People with Disability), 10% were part of the Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Waiver (HCBS) program, and 2% were eligible for Medicaid for other reasons, including being in the foster care system. The study population of 898 enrollees had a larger percentage of children and more enrollees who access Medicaid services through income eligibility. The population included 740 adults (82%) and 158 children (18%) who were eligible for Medicaid through SSI (48%), income eligible programs such as FIP (46%), HCBS (4%), and through other programs such as foster care (2%). Table 2 indicates the number of enrollees per health home provider. There were only 9 active health home providers that served enrollees long enough to provide data for the outcomes. Enrollees from 34 counties accessed care through these health home providers. 8

Table 2. Number of enrollees by health home provider Health home provider Number (percent) of enrollees in population Number (percent) of enrollees in outcome analyses Waterloo Medical Education 402 (9%) 163 (18%) Primary Health Care FQHC (includes all three locations) 2,175 (16%) 224 (25%) Broadlawns 835 (18%) 60 (7%) Mercy-Akron 134 (3%) 57 (6%) Siouxland 1,202 (26%) 361 (40%) McFarland Clinic-North 15 (<1%) 0 (0%) McFarland Clinic-East 81 (2%) 22 (2%) Primghar Mercy Medical Center 38 (1%) 11 (1%) Madison County Health Home 10 (<1%) 0 (0%) Table 3. Age, Gender, and Race/Ethnicity for the health home enrollee population and study population Characteristic Number (percent) of enrollees in population Number (percent) of enrollees in outcome analyses Female 63% 66% Race/Ethnicity* White 53% 57% Black or African American 15% 14% Hispanic/Latino 5% 9% Asian/Pacific Islander <1% 1% American Indian 2% 3% Other <1% 1% Undeclared 22% 16% Age 0-19 years old 12% 21% 20-44 years old 27% 38% 45-64 years old 46% 41% Comparisons of characteristics of the enrollees in the outcome analyses to the enrollees in the health home population indicate that those in the analyses are younger, more likely to be white or Hispanic and less likely to be undeclared. 9

Outcome results The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) provides nationally accepted outcome measurement protocols under the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS). The outcome measures provided in this report are a selection of these measures that have been modified due to the small number of health home enrollees who met the inclusion criteria. The three primary outcomes emergency department visits, skilled nursing facility admissions, and hospital readmissions are normally considered to occur infrequently or rarely. In particular, since those 65 years of age and over and those with dual Medicaid/Medicare eligibility were removed from the measures, there is very little reason to expect skilled nursing facility admissions. Limitations Claims data has a set of limitations that must be considered when calculating population rates. Only claims actually submitted by the providers are used for outcome rate calculations, we may be missing claims and therefore, underestimating the rates for specific services. This outcomes analysis is limited to a 9 month time frame in the pre- and post-enrollment period for some measures. This limitation may artificially affect the rate comparisons. For example, enrollees who access well care during the pre-enrollment period may not access care at exactly the same time in the postenrollment period and may, in fact, wait more than one year for a repeat visit. These visits will not be captured with the current protocol. Finally, the run out period for the claims used in these analyses is only 4 months. Though we are certain of capturing at least 90% of the claims in the post-enrollment period, we know that we have nearly 100% of the claims in the pre-enrollment period. This discrepancy may account for rate differences. Ambulatory Care Ambulatory care visits include any visits to a health care provider that do not include an inpatient admission. These visits encompass physician office visits, outpatient clinics, and emergency departments. Outpatient visits were defined through CPT coding and revenue codes. The CPT codes included 99201-99205, 99211-99215, and 99241-99245 to define office visits; 99341-99345, and 99347-99350 to define home visits; 99304-99310, 99315, 99316, and 99318 to define nursing facility care; 99324-99328 and 99334-99337 to define domiciliary or rest home care; 99381-99387, 99391-99397, 99401-99404, 99411, 99412, 99420 and 99429 to define preventive medicine; and 92002, 92004, 92012 and 92014 to define ophthalmology and optometry. The revenue codes included 510-519, 526-529 982, and 983 to define office visits and 524 and 525 to define nursing facility care. Emergency department visits were defined by combinations of codes as follows: 1) revenue code 450-459 or 981, 2) CPT code 10040-69979 and place of service 23, or 3) CPT code 99281-99285. Emergency department visits include care provided in the emergency room and urgently or emergently at a physicians office or satellite location. 10

Two modifications were made to the HEDIS specifications for this measure: 1) the specifications retain all members regardless of the number of months they are eligible, while the following measure only includes enrollees who were eligible for at least 11 months in the 12 months prior to enrollment and at least 8 months in the 9 months following enrollment and 2) mental health and substance abuse claims are normally removed, while they were maintained for the following measure. Tables 4-6 and Figures 2 and 3 present the rates for ambulatory visits broken into emergency department and outpatient. These rates are much higher than those found in the IowaCare program and reflect a population that is chronically ill. These rates are reflected in Figure 2 which illustrates that as the severity of illness increases so does the number of visits per 1000 eligible months, especially emergency department visits. Table 5 and Figure 3 provide the visit rates by age. Not surprisingly, the rates for both emergency department and outpatient visits are lowest for the group of children, adolescents and young adults. The outpatient visit rate continues to rise with age, while the emergency department rate rises and then declines for the oldest group. Table 6 shows that women are more likely to utilize the emergency department and outpatient care than men across all age groups. Table 4. Emergency department and outpatient visits by health home tier ED visits/1000 months Outpatient Visits/1000 months Tier level 12 months prior to enrollment 9 months following enrollment 12 months prior to enrollment 9 months following enrollment Tier 1 129 122 609 547 Tier 2 188 176 791 754 Tier 3 275 142 1042 885 Tier 4 308 433 1058 1167 Total 167 147 723 662 11

Figure 2. Emergency department and outpatient visits per 1000 eligible months by tier 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 ED Rate Pre ED Rate Post Outp Rate Pre Outp Rate Post 200 0 Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Table 5. Emergency department and outpatient visits per 100 eligible months by age ED visits/1000 months Outpatient Visits/1000 months Age 12 months prior to enrollment 9 months following enrollment 12 months prior to enrollment 9 months following enrollment 0-19 years old 172 85 914 577 20-44 years old 969 661 3262 2194 45-64 years old 656 436 3603 2566 12

Figure 3. Emergency department and outpatient visits per 1000 eligible months by age 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 ED Rate Pre ED Rate Post Outp Rate Pre Outp Rate Post 100 0 0-19 years 20-44 years 45-64 years Table 6. Emergency department and outpatient visits per 1000 eligible months by age and gender Age Females Males ER rate 0-19 years old 93 70 20-44 years old 247 213 45-64 years old 157 143 Outpatient rate 0-19 years old 55 30 20-44 years old 195 222 45-64 years old 138 117 13

Figure 4. Emergency department and outpatient visits per 1000 eligible months by gender and age ED Rate Pre ED Rate Post Outp Rate Pre Outp Rate Post 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Females 0-19 years Females 20-44 years Females 45-64 years Males 0-19 years Males 20- Males 45-44 years 64 years Emergency department diagnosis Primary diagnosis codes associated with an emergency department visit were used to determine the most common reasons for emergency department visits. These visits are listed in Table 7. As is seen in the IowaCare population, the primary reasons that enrollees come to the emergency department are related to pain-abdominal, Chest, Back, and Headache. Respiratory symptoms are listed more often for the health home population than for IowaCare as would be expected in a group that has asthma as one of the qualifying diagnoses. ED visits for these reasons are expected to decrease as an outcome of health home. The diagnoses provided in Table 7 are derived from two sets of claims. Since these numbers are not adjusted for the number of enrolled months as the previous rates were, the claims for the pre-enrollment period mirror the months during the 9 month post-enrollment period. For example, an individual enrolled on July 1, 2013 would have claims from July1, 2011 through February 29, 2012 for the pre-enrollment period and claims from July 1, 2012 through February 29, 2013 for the post-enrollment period. 14

Table 7. Top ten diagnoses for emergency room visits in year prior to health home enrollment compared to the IowaCare population ICD-9 Code Description Number of visits preenrollment Number of visits postenrollment SFY 2012 Number of visits (rank) IowaCare enrollees 789.0 Abdominal pain 157 95 2,192 (1) 786.5 Chest pain 116 80 1,675 (2) 784.0/346.9 Headache/Migraine 88 60 1,146 (4) 724.1-724.9 Back pain 71 36 1,569 (3) 493 Asthma 50 30 516 (7) 719.4 Pain in joint 40 29 1,083 (5) 780.3 Convulsions 31 N/A 462 Acute pharyngitis 30 N/A 599.0 UTI 29 23 377 (10) 787.0 Nausea/vomiting 29 17 435 (9) 465.9 Acute URI 15 514 (8) Nursing facility utilization Those enrolled in health homes are expected to have a decreased rate of skilled nursing facility admissions. Data for this measure is only reported for the preenrollment period due to the long lag time between experiencing the care and having the facility bill the services. During the pre-enrollment period there were three skilled nursing facility (SNF) admission; one person was admitted for 4 months for wound care related to skin ulcers, one person was admitted for 1 week for therapeutic drug monitoring related to septicemia, and the third person was admitted for two different periods for abscess with a known bacteria. There was also one admission to a Psychiatric Medical Institution for Children (PMIC) for a teenager with major depressive disorder. In addition to skilled nursing facility admissions there were 11 enrollees admitted to or residing in an Intermediate Care Facility and one admitted to a Residential Care Facility (RCF). Hospital Readmission The outcome measure for hospital readmission is derived from the HEDIS All Cause Plan Readmission rate measure. The number of enrollees was too small to adequately risk adjust the data, however, some information regarding readmissions serves to 15

inform the evaluation. Hospital stays are identified for adults (over 18) only as there is little information regarding methods for calculating these rates in children. Also, stays for pregnancy related diagnoses or mental health/substance abuse related diagnoses are removed from the analyses. The first admission is considered the Index Hospital Stay (IHS). There were 57 enrollees with 159 hospital stays with a readmission within 30 days. Of these, 37 had one hospital stay with a readmission, 12 had two stays with a readmission, and eight had 3-5 stays with a readmission. For this latter group, the readmission to one stay may actually form the IHS for the next stay, resulting in serial readmissions under 30 days. The average length of stay for IHS was 4 days with 1 day being the shortest stay and 13 days being the longest stay. The gap between hospital stays averaged 16 days with the shortest gap between stays being two days. Figure 4 displays these results. Figure 5. Length of gap between IHS and readmission hospital stay 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930 Days The most common primary diagnoses on IHS are listed by condition with number of stays in parentheses: diabetes (7), heart failure (7), acute myocardial infarction (6), chronic bronchitis (4), asthma (4) and cellulitis/abscess (4). The most common primary diagnoses for readmission were other complications of procedures, not elsewhere classified (8), asthma (6), respiratory symptoms (5), septicemia (4), chronic bronchitis (4), and cellulitis/abscess (4). Clearly, readmissions due to complications, septicemia or abscess should be reduced when enrollees are provided the full complement of services under the health home model. In an effort to determine the effects of the Health Home on readmissions, the number of readmissions within 30 days for the same diagnosis was computed. Within the preenrollment period there were seven and in the post-enrollment period there were six readmissions within 30 days for the same diagnosis code. The readmissions occurred 16

for seven enrollees, with three having readmissions in both the pre- and postenrollment period. The codes are listed in Table 8. Table 8. Primary diagnosis for IHS and readmission within 30 days for the pre- and post-enrollment periods. Diagnosis code Number in pre-enrollment Number in postenrollment Description 250.13 Ketoacidosis, Type 1 diabetes, uncontrolled 1 1 276.1 Hyponatremia 1 0 282.62 Sickle-cell with crisis 2 1 427.31 Atrial fibrillation 2 1 491.21 Acute obstructive chronic bronchitis 1 0 493.92 Asthma, unspec, acute 0 1 786.59 Painful respiration 0 1 998.12 Hematoma complicating a procedure 0 1 Access to preventive and ambulatory care at the health home Health home providers may enroll qualifying Medicaid recipients by completing and form to determine eligibility and the tier placement. In addition, they are asked to obtain the recipients agreement to be enrolled. These activities can either take place during an office visit or the provider can fill out the form without the recipient present and ascertain agreement through a phone conversation. One expected outcome of the health home is more consistent monitoring of enrollees chronic conditions. The baseline measure for this outcome is the proportion of enrollees with at least one preventive visit and the proportion of enrollees with at least one ambulatory visit with the health home provider. We utilized definitions from four separate measures to calculate these rates. 1. Adult access to Ambulatory Care measure 2. Well child visits in the third, fourth, fifth and sixth year of life 3. Well child visits in the first 15 months of life 4. Adolescent well care These measures resulted in the definition of preventive care and ambulatory care provided below. Preventive care CPT codes included: 99381-99387, 99391-99397,99401-99404,9411-99412, 99420, 99429, G0438, G0439. Diagnosis codes included: V70.9, V70.9, V70.9, V70.9. Ambulatory care CPT codes included: 99381-99387, 99391-99397,99401-99404,9411-99412,99201-99205, 99211-99215, 99241-99245,99341-99350, 99304-99310, 99315, 99316, 99318, 99324-99328, 99334-99337, 92002, 92004, 92012. 92014. 99420, 99429, G0438, G0439. Diagnosis codes included: V70.9, V70.9, V70.9, V70.9. 17

Most health home enrollees (70%) had seen the health home provider in the preenrollment period. This was true across age groups, however, health home enrollees were less likely to have seen the health home provider for a preventive visit in the year prior to enrollment if they were in older age categories. Figures 6 and 7 provide the visit rates by age. The patterns of care are similar by visit type, preventive care rates are lower for enrollees in older age categories and ambulatory care rates are similar across age categories.. These data indicate that health home enrollees should be familiar with their health home and may be expected to have a well-established relationship with the health home office. With one exception well care and ambulatory care rates are lower in the postenrollment period. This may be difficult to explain as health homes should be increasing the rates of well care and of ambulatory care required for monitoring diseases and treatments. These rates should be interpreted with care as the program is just starting and we are unable to utilize a full year of claims due to the timing of the outcomes analyses and program start date. Figure 6. Well care visits at the health home provider by age in the pre- and postenrollment period 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0-6 years 7-11 years 12-17 years 18-2122-4445-64 Total years years years Well visit pre-enrollment Well visit postenrollment 18

Table 9. Well care visits at the health home provider by age in the pre- and postenrollment period Age Number in age group Percent with well care visits Percent with ambulatory visit Preenrollment Postenrollment Preenrollment Postenrollment 0-6 years 30 43% 23% 58% 43% 7-11 years 41 17% 17% 63% 54% 12-17 years 93 15% 26% 66% 69% 18-21 years 45 27% 11% 69% 53% 20-44 years old 324 13% 15% 70% 67% 45-64 years old 365 16% 10% 72% 68% Figure 7. Ambulatory care visits at the health home provider by age and gender in the pre- and post-enrollment period 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Ambulatory visit preenrollment Ambulatory visit postenrollment 10% 0% 0-6 years 7-11 years 12-17 years 18-21 years 22-44 45-64 Total years years 19