National Health IT Collaborative for the Underserved. Understanding of the Problem/Rationale for the Collaborative

Similar documents
NATIONAL HEALTH IT. For the Underserved. The National Health IT Collaborative for the Underserved 1

National Regional Extension Centers and Health Information Exchange Summit West

Understanding the Impact of Health IT in Underserved Communities and Those with Health Disparities

Rural Health Clinics

Cultivating External Partners as a Strategy in Achieving Your Hospital s Community Benefit Goals

Draft Ohio Primary Care Workforce Plan

LegalNotes. Disparities Reduction and Minority Health Improvement under the ACA. Introduction. Highlights. Volume3 Issue1

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Overview

Pay for Performance and Health Information Technology: Overview of HIT Pay for Performance Initiatives

The Future of Nursing and the Role of Accelerated Degree Students

Navigating an Enhanced Rural Health Model for Maryland

Effective Care for High-Need, High-Cost Patients: How to Maximize Prevention and Population Health Efforts

Key Components of the HITECH Act include:

Achieving Health Equity After the ACA: Implications for cost, quality and access

1:00pm EST Webinar will begin shortly.

Assessing and Increasing Readiness for Patient-Centered Medical Home Implementation 1

Building a Movement to Change the Way America Treats Our Seriously Ill

Medicaid Update Special Edition Budget Highlights New York State Budget: Health Reform Highlights

Primary Care 101: A Glossary for Prevention Practitioners

February Understanding Diverse Investments and Moving Forward Under Health Care Reform

National Multiple Sclerosis Society

The Affordable Care Act, HRSA, and the Integration of Behavioral Health Services

States of Change: Expanding the Health Care Workforce and Creating Community-Clinical Partnerships

Community Health Worker (CHW) Strategies and Local Public Health: Overview and Opportunities Local Public Health Association Meeting May 16, 2013

Comparison of ACP Policy and IOM Report Graduate Medical Education That Meets the Nation's Health Needs

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Incentivizing Investments in Healthcare

SAFETY NET 2017 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Consumer Health Foundation

STATEMENT OF POLICY. Foundational Public Health Services

The Opportunities and Challenges of Health Reform

Integration of Clinical Care and Public Health Systems: The need as reflected in the work of the Alliance to Reduce Disparities in Diabetes

Overview of Health Information Exchange (HIE) Prepared by the HIMSS Health Information Exchange Steering Committee August 2009

Transforming Louisiana s Long Term Care Supports and Services System. Initial Program Concept

Overview of Select Health Provisions FY 2015 Administration Budget Proposal

Quality Measures and Federal Policy: Increasingly Important and A Work in Progress. American Health Quality Association Policy Forum Washington, D.C.

North Country Community Mental Health Response to MDCH Request for Information Medicare and Medicaid Dual Eligible Project September 2011

North Carolina Medicaid and NC Health Choice Transformation Request for Public Input

Community Health Workers Perspectives from Massachusetts Joanne L. Calista, MS, LICSW Executive Director, Central MA AHEC, Inc.

The global health workforce crisis: an unfinished agenda

Introduction Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)

CHA Summary of IRS Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Community Health Needs Assessments and Implementation Strategies (April 2013)

Defunding the Affordable Care Act: Discretionary Programs to Target in the Healthcare Reform Law Schalla Ross l November 2010

HIT Glossary and Acronym List

Privacy and Security Solutions for. Interoperable Health Information Exchange

PATIENT ATTRIBUTION WHITE PAPER

Lorain County Board of Mental Health Strategic Plan Updates

NQF s Contributions to the Nation s Health

Accountable Care: Clinical Integration is the Foundation

Sample Exam Case Studies/Questions

RECOMMENDATIONS FROM WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT WORKGROUP

Trends in Health Information Exchange (HIE) and Links to Medicaid Led Quality Improvement

Mental Health Liaison Group

The Future of Delivery System Reform in Medi-Cal: Moving Medi-Cal Forward

WHITE PAPER. Maximizing Pay-for-Performance Opportunities Proven Steps to Making P4P a Proactive, Successful and Sustainable Part of Your Practice

MassHealth Accountable Care Update

Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America

Using population health management tools to improve quality

Strategic Plan. Washington Regional Food Funders. A Working Group of the Washington Regional Association of Grantmakers

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) State, Tribal and Community Partnerships to Identify and Control Hypertension

SNC BRIEF. Safety Net Clinics of Greater Kansas City EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHALLENGES FACING SAFETY NET PROVIDERS TOP ISSUES:

The Role of Health IT in Quality Improvement. P. Jon White, MD Health IT Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Geographic Adjustment Factors in Medicare

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

Integrated Leadership for Hospitals and Health Systems: Principles for Success

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System Framework

Pennsylvania Patient and Provider Network (P3N)

HRSA & Health Workforce: National Health Service Corps...and so much more

Transdisciplinary Care: Opportunities and Challenges for Behavioral Health Providers

Nursing Knowledge: Big Data Research for Transforming Healthcare HIMSS NI Nurse Executive Workgroup January 9, 2014

community clinic case studies professional development

Transforming Maternity Care

Partnership HealthPlan of California Strategic Plan

Rural Health and the Law: Emerging Issues and Trends

Creating Quality Improvement and Incentive Platforms in the Safety Net 2009 Pay for Performance Summit

Illinois Governor s Office of Health Innovation and Transformation

Community Health Workers & Rural Health: Increasing Access, Improving Care Minnesota Rural Health Conference June 26, 2012

Measuring Value and Outcomes for Continuous Quality Improvement. Noelle Flaherty MS, MBA, RN, CCM, CPHQ 1. Jodi Cichetti, MS, RN, BS, CCM, CPHQ

Welcome to. Primary Care and Public Health: Linking Public Health and Advanced Primary Care to Improve Outcomes

transforming california s healthcare safety net through value-based care

Running head: REVISING THE NURSING CURRICULUM 1

2017 House of Delegates Report of the Policy Committee

Looking Forward: Health Education Priorities for America

JOINT MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS

Illinois' Behavioral Health 1115 Waiver Application - Comments

UAMS/SVI Partnership Agreement. Proposal

National Academies of Sciences Achieving Rural Health Equity and Well-being:

HOW WILL MINORITY-SERVING HOSPITALS FARE UNDER THE ACA?

REGION 5 INFORMATION FOR PER CAPITA AND COMPETITIVE GRANT APPLICANTS Updated April, 2018

Social Determinants of Health and Medicaid Payment Reform

National League for Nursing February 5, 2016 Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice: The New Forty-Year-Old Field

LEGISLATIVE REPORT NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH TRANSFORMATION CENTER (TRANSFORMATION INNOVATIONS CENTER) PROGRAM DESIGN AND BUDGET PROPOSAL

2015 TELLIGEN COMMUNITY INITIATIVE (TCI)

National Coalition on Care Coordination (N3C) Care Coordination and the Role of the Aging Network. Monday, September 12, 2011

ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION & ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT MODEL SUMMIT

Transitioning to a Value-Based Accountable Health System Preparing for the New Business Model. The New Accountable Care Business Model

Understanding Client Retention

Bank of America Settlement Funds Request for Proposals

Michigan s Vision for Health Information Technology and Exchange

MENTAL HEALTH 2018 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

The Alabama Health Action Coalition: Working Towards Improving Alabama s Health June 21 st, 2016

Transcription:

National Health IT Collaborative for the Underserved A Public/Private Partnership for a Healthier America Understanding of the Problem/Rationale for the Collaborative Over three decades, health care in the United States has transitioned from a care delivery model where a single medical practitioner served as the sole source of care to a care delivery model where large-scale institutions provide and pay for care. The complexity exhibited by our current care delivery model requires a myriad of Federal and state laws and regulations that are difficult to understand and navigate for large payors and providers. Health disparate and underserved* populations are further impacted as they rarely have the resources or tools to effectively understand and navigate the mix of federal, state and local entities that are engaged in to providing health care for these groups. In addition, significant disparities exist in our healthcare system, with respect to such key areas as insurance coverage, access, quality of treatment and outcomes. These disparities occur most frequently among racial/ethnic minorities and other medically underserved communities. Despite efforts to reform health care systems through structure, process and technology interventions, health disparities persist and gaps appear to be widening. Numerous efforts to reform our nation s health care system are being proposed and tested; yet little attention is being devoted to underserved communities. Reform efforts targeted toward disparities need to take advantage of advances in health information technology and best practices developed in states, counties and local communities in order to facilitate wholesale improvements and significantly increased access to care. Such efforts and others yet to be undertaken will help provide the requisite tools and technologies, if accompanied by culturally/linguistically appropriate outreach and educational initiatives; advocacy and public policy strategies; workforce development and training ventures; and concrete options for funding and sustainability. Such a comprehensive approach will be required to bring underserved populations into our national HIT framework, thus ensuring that the underserved will not be left behind. This need has never been more pressing. The urgency of addressing the needs of underserved populations cannot be overstated. The fragmented nature of our nation s health system has imposed special burdens on the most vulnerable areas and populations, already disadvantaged by socio-economic, historical and other societal barriers. If current trends in health disparities are not reversed, by 2050 nearly one in two Americans will be persons of color with higher levels of chronic diseases, shorter life spans, less health insurance and generally poorer health. (IOM, 2003) (Alliance for Health Reform, 2006).

To ensure that our nation s underserved populations are not left behind as health information technologies are developed and employed, four entities have chosen to come together as conveners of the National Health IT Collaborative for the Underserved. These organizations are: the Department of Health and Human Services/Office of Minority Health (HHS/OMH); the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) Foundation s Institute for e-health Policy; Summit Health Institute for Research and Education, Inc. (SHIRE), and Apptis, Inc. These initial conveners will be joined by a consortium of Federal agencies and other key private sector and communitybased stakeholders to mount a phased 18-month initiative. As a long-range goal, participants will work jointly to propose solutions to improve the quality of care increase access to care and care-related service; and reduce the cost of care among the underserved. Vision The National Health IT Collaborative for the Underserved envisions an interconnected public and private health system where all consumers have access to high quality, affordable care and to the information and technology resources required to maximize their access and effective use of health care services. Purpose The purpose of the Collaborative is to convene, study, experiment and propose solutions to help reduce and ultimately eliminate health disparities experienced by medically underserved areas and populations through the use of advances in health IT. We will incorporate a wealth of experience in both the public and private sectors to assess and propose new ideas to improve the health of those communities and populations that have historically had the worst health outcomes and the least access to care. Mission The mission of the Collaborative encompasses the following: Convene a diverse and multi-stakeholder group of community, public and private sector thought leaders to examine how to advance the availability of quality health services for all, including low income, racial/ethnic minority populations and other underserved populations, in a secure, timely, efficient, responsive and coordinated nation-wide system of care. Propose solutions that contribute to the coordination of preventive and primary care in both public and private sectors and which enhance the lives of all Americans, including those most vulnerable. Research and work to ensure that Federal, state, local and private efforts to develop and coordinate advances in information technology in the health arena 2

include revised or new federal and state legislation, regulations, funding, programs and initiatives for underserved communities. Anticipated Outcomes The National HIT Collaborative will convene and include leaders and subject matter experts in the following key areas: health information technology, education and outreach, advocacy and public policy, workforce development and training, and funding. These individuals will be leaders in their fields who have the capability to organize, motivate, build and sustain momentum necessary to produce by September 2009 outcomes or results, which may include the following: A compilation of models, strategies, practices and/or activities with proven effectiveness in informing and engaging the underserved in the use of HIT for health self-management and empowerment; New or revised Federal or state legislation or regulations or other model legislation that can be considered for adoption at Federal, state or local levels to advance the adoption and use of HIT by consumers and providers from underserved populations; Description of academic, in-service and other models, strategies, practices and/or activities resulting in the availability of health professionals and technical personnel in underserved communities who are HIT-literate and competent. A compendium of public and private funding options and written guidance for underserved communities seeking financial support for HIT/Health Information Exchange operations and sustainability. Recommendations for a structural framework to maintain an emphasis on HIT adoption in underserved communities, with such functions as providing for information exchange; conducting pilot programs; providing technical assistance and publication of community guidance documents. This framework must be consistent with other ongoing national and state-level efforts, such as those advanced by the American Health Information Community (AHIC) and AHIC 2.0; Certification Commission on HIT (CCHIT); Health Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP); Health Information Security and Privacy Collaboration (HISPC); and other initiatives. Process 1. The HIT-UP Collaborative was the brainchild of Ruth Perot (SHIRE), Mary Walker (Apptis) and Dave Roberts (HIMSS). 2. The conveners of the HIT Collaborative officially initiated their planning in March 2008, when Apptis, Inc. made available an Executive-in-Residence, Mary L. Walker, to work with HHS/OMH, Institute for e-health Policy and SHIRE on a 3

national project of significance. Mary Walker works out of donated office space in the Institute for e-health Policy s Arlington, Virginia office. 3. Initial activities of the conveners have included the conceptualization of the 18- month HIT initiative; identification of other key players; provision of technical and administrative support; location of initial funding resources; and defining the parameters of the Collaborative s launch on June 12 th during National HIT Week 2008. 4. Initial conveners strategized, prioritized among key areas of focus, and selected four specific workgroup topics; specified requirements for launching the HIT initiative; identified prospective keynote speakers and panelists for the June 12 launch event; and clarified a process for the selection of workgroup leaders and members. 5. Conveners contacted prospective presenters and participants for the June 12 th launch event and continue to secure funding for the initial phases of the effort through September 2009. 6. The Collaborative leadership group will solicit volunteers and other forms of support during the start-up phase of the initiative to provide administrative and technical support for the functioning of four workgroups. Workgroups will be headed by convener-designated leaders who will ensure that agreed-upon tasks are completed by September 2009. 7. Workgroup members will be volunteers who will be recruited via a national selection process similar to the process employed for AHIC 2.0. It is anticipated that workgroups will have no more than 20 members, including the chair and cochair. Workgroup members will serve without compensation or other forms of remuneration. 8. Initial workgroup updates will be reported at a special forum to be held in conjunction with the HIMSS09 Annual Conference & Exhibition in Chicago in April 2009. Final workgroup recommendations from the first phase of their work will be discussed and published following a Collaborative event held in Washington, D.C. during National Health IT Week 09 in September 2009. Leadership and Coordination The starting group will comprise representatives from each of the convening organizations HHS/OMH, Institute for e-health Policy, SHIRE and Apptis and will be augmented by other selected organizations. In November 2008, ehealth Initiative Foundation joined the Collaborative s Management Committee. Led by Dr. Garth Graham, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Minority Health, Department of Health and Human Services, this taskforce will work to identify health leadership in both the public and private sectors nationally, statewide and locally, and will work to expand their contributions and those of their organizations to the Collaborative. This taskforce will set up interchanges between leaders, soliciting their views on policy and procedures, and will seek resources from these entities. The Leadership and Coordination Workgroup will also 4

ensure the smooth functioning of the four issue-focused workgroups, as well as the coordination and cross-fertilization of workgroup efforts. Collaborative Membership Categories Collaborative members will represent groups such as the following: Consumers Community health centers Health care providers Health care payers Underserved community advocates HIT-related and other private sector entities Quality and patient safety organizations Government and related programs Foundations and other funders Academic institutions Health information exchanges (state, regional, community-level) Other health and allied health organizations Key Workgroups/Scopes of Work Workgroup #1: Education and Outreach. This workgroup will identify and develop effective practices for communicating HIT benefits to diverse underserved populations. This effort should include identifying/creating and distributing culturally/linguistically appropriate materials to these communities. A focus of this workgroup will be on promoting opportunities to educate individuals on the value of HIT to improve health self-management and support consumer empowerment. (Chair: M. Christopher Gibbons, MD, and Co-Chair, Neil Calman, MD) Workgroup #2: Advocacy and Policy. This workgroup will provide environmental scans assessments of current federal HIT legislative/regulatory proposals/actions addressing underserved/rural populations. This group will also review state legislation/regulations for potential impact on these populations; identify components of model HIT legislation required to address needs of underserved/rural populations; and ascertain available legislative language that could be included in model legislation. These activities may culminate in the preparation of draft model legislation, which can be circulated for comment by stakeholder groups. Model legislation that has had the benefit of broad stakeholder review will be the workgroup s final product. This final product will 5

then be available to any stakeholders who desire to transform health care for all communities in the United States. (Chair: Dave Roberts, Vice President, HIMSS) Workgroup #3: Workforce Training and Development. This workgroup will study, develop and/or identify key strategies to train personnel from underserved communities; work with clinical staff to increase their capacity, knowledge and utilization of HIT tools and technologies; and help identify methodologies and processes for quick adoption of HIT tools by clinical and other health professional staff to accomplish quality improvement and cost savings. An additional task will be to promote the involvement of academic institutions to prepare individuals from underserved communities for HIT careers. (Chair: Brian P. Foley, MED, MHA, CPHQ, FACHE and Co-Chair, Jeffery Caballero, MSW) Workgroup #4: Finance and Sustainability This workgroup will address such tasks as developing a clearinghouse for funding opportunities for underserved communities that are available through the industry and government; identifying and/or developing innovative ways for the private sector to invest and support HIT projects and programs in these communities; and developing tools to support communities to successfully access and acquire public and private funds. (Chair: Adam Welsh, Director and Senior Vice President, Apptis, Inc. and Co-Chair, Diane Pinakiewicz, MBA) * The definition of underserved populations includes, but is not limited to, Medically Underserved Areas (MUA) and Medically Underserved Populations (MUP), the definitions of which are currently under review. MUA and MUPs are defined as areas or population groups with a quantifiable shortage of personal health services as defined using U.S. DHHS designation area criteria. MUA/MUP designations can qualify areas and population groups for benefits under the following programs: Community Health Centers and Federally Qualified Health Centers, Federally Qualified Health Centers Look-Alike Program, the Rural Health Clinic Act, and the, Medically Underserved Community-State Matching Incentive Program. 6