[date] Health Net s Medicare Advantage and Dual Eligible Programs Issue Write-Up Form - Instructions for Completion

Similar documents
National Policy Library Document

Policy Author: Author Title: Author Department: Reporting

LOW INCOME SUBSIDY (LIS) DEEMING UPDATES STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

National Policy Library Document

Final Report. PrimeWest Health System

A. Encounter Data Submission Requirements

OFFICE OF AUDIT REGION 9 f LOS ANGELES, CA. Office of Native American Programs, Washington, DC

National Policy Library Document

Health Partners Plans Medicare FDR Requirements Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

TABLE OF CONTENTS DELEGATED GROUPS

Policy Number: Title: Abstract Purpose: Policy Detail:

National Policy Library Document

UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT Section 4. Overview The Plan s Utilization Management (UM)

Director, Offices of Hearings and Inquiries. James Slade Deputy Director, Offices of Hearings and Inquiries

FALLON TOTAL CARE. Enrollee Information

Summary of NCLB: Service to Private School Students

Final Report. HealthPartners, Inc. And Group Health, Inc. Quality Assurance Examination

2018 Northern California HMO Provider Manual Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

The Office of Innovation and Improvement s Oversight and Monitoring of the Charter Schools Program s Planning and Implementation Grants

Final Report. llfflll Minnesota. m&iaii Department ofhealth MANAGED CARE SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSURANCE EXAMINATION. South Country Health Alliance

Welcome to Health Net

NORTH CAROLINA FAMILIES ACCESSING SERVICES THROUGH TECHNOLOGY (NC FAST)

LIMITED-SCOPE PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT

When the Auditors Get Audited

Writing a Plan of Correction

HOME AND COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES (HCBS) STATEWIDE SETTINGS TRANSITION PLAN

Administrative services which may be delegated to IPAs, Medical Groups, Vendors, or other organizations include:

DOD MANUAL DOD ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (ELAP)

Complaints, Feedback and Appeals Management

The Joint Legislative Audit Committee requested that we

Delegation Oversight 101: How to Pass Oversight Audits Session Code: TU01 Time: 8:00 a.m. 9:30 a.m. Total CE Credits: 1.5 Presenter: Angela Dorsey,

Informal Dispute Resolution and Independent Informal Dispute Resolution Key Elements and Updates

Administrative Procedures

SECTION 9 Referrals and Authorizations

State Medicaid Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Program

Any potential fiscal action will be calculated once the corrective action responses have been received and approved.

Organizations Interested in Offering Capitated Financial Alignment Demonstration Plans in Interested States

2012 Medicare Compliance Plan

Understanding and Leveraging Continuity of Care

Appeals and Grievances

Community Based Adult Services (CBAS) Manual

Alignment. Alignment Healthcare

Civil Money Penalty Funds

Final Report. UCare Minnesota 2005

YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS THIS NOTICE DESCRIBES YOUR RIGHTS TO FILE AN APPEAL WITH COMMUNITY HEALTH GROUP. PLEASE REVIEW IT CAREFULLY.

Long Term Care Nursing Facility Resource Guide

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

NN SS 401 NEURONEXT NETWORK STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR SITE SELECTION AND QUALIFICATION

Presented to: The Sacramento Medi-Cal Managed Care Stakeholder s Advisory Committee

You recently called the Medicare Rights helpline for assistance with a denial from your Medicare private health plan.

FDRs = "First tier", "Downstream" and "Related" entities 3/8/2017. Session 410: Medicare FDRs and Compliance Programs. Presentation Overview

2019 Health Net Seniority Plus Amber I (HMO SNP) H0562: 055 Fresno, Kern, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco

Report No. DODIG May 31, Defense Departmental Reporting System-Budgetary Was Not Effectively Implemented for the Army General Fund

OFFICE OF AUDIT REGION 7 KANSAS CITY, KS. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Section 3 for Public Housing Authorities

Managing employees include: Organizational structures include: Note:

ADAPTING TO THE MEDICAID MANAGED CARE ENVIRONMENT

U. S. Virgin Islands Compliance Agreement

= AUDIO. Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. An Important Reminder. Mission of OFMQ 9/23/2015. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Understanding the Grievances and Appeals Process for Medicaid Enrollees

Our general comments are listed below, and discussed in greater depth in the appropriate Sections of the RFP.

Page 1 of 5 Version No: 6 Authorised by: General Counsel

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Health Insurance Administration

ALABAMA MEDICAID AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 560-X-45 MATERNITY CARE PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Transition to Version 5010 and ICD-10

Mariposa County Behavioral Health and Recovery Services QUALITY IMPROVEMENT WORKPLAN

UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DESCRIPTION MEDICAL ASSOCIATES HEALTH PLANS 2016

Butte County Department of Behavioral Health

2018 Evidence of Coverage

DIA COMPLIANCE OVERVIEW FOR HOME HEALTH AGENCIES

Audits, Administrative Reviews, & Serious Deficiencies

Appeals and Grievances

Northwest Utilization Management Policy & Procedure: UR 13a Title: Formulary Exception Process and Excluded Drug Review

Utilization Review Determination Time Frames

Dean Health Plan Physical Medicine Overview

Standard Operating Procedures

Northwest Utilization Management Policy & Procedure: UR 13a Title: Formulary Exception Process and Excluded Drug Review

AUDITOR GENERAL S REPORT

Mercy Care Advantage (HMO SNP) 2018 Evidence of Coverage Evidencia de Cobertura Visit/Viste

CONTRACT YEAR 2011 MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PRIVATE FEE-FOR-SERVICE PLAN MODEL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT

5/1/2017 THE BEST DEFENSE IS A GOOD OFFENSE OBJECTIVES. Preparing for a Home Health Medicare Recertification Survey

Mississippi Medicaid Hospice Services Provider Manual

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

STATE FISCAL YEAR 2017 ANNUAL NURSING HOME QUESTIONNAIRE (ANHQ) July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017

IU ClinicalTrials.gov: Compliance Program Plan

Appendix 5A. Organization Registration and Certification Manual

Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicaid Integrity Program

Complaint Investigations of Minnesota Health Care Facilities

LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PROBE AND EDUCATE AUDIT K. CHEYENNE SANTIAGO, RN

Felipe Lopez, Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP

Single Audit Entrance Conference Uniform Guidance Refresher

How to Draft New & Update Old Policies and Procedures. Agenda. Why?

UW MEDICINE ICD-10 Program UW MEDICINE ICD-10

Emory University Research Administration Services (RAS) Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:

Volume 24, No. 07 July 2014

PACAH 2018 SPRING CONFERENCE April 26, 2018

Identification and Protection of Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information

Application for a 1915(c) Home and Community-Based Services Waiver

South Country Health Alliance

Magellan Complete Care of Florida. Provider Training Conducted By:

Transcription:

Health Net s Medicare Advantage and Dual Eligible Programs Issue Write-Up Form - Instructions for Completion This process is not related to and is separate from any provider appeals processes. Consider the following when drafting the issue write-up. Use clear language that a layperson could understand. Anyone reading any section of the issue write up should be able to understand the system s issues, actions and timeline Identify systems involved, such as pharmacy or enrollment Use only widely accepted abbreviations after completely spelling out the term the first time. Explain all acronyms Do not lay blame when explaining issues. CMS considers Health Net to be ultimately responsible even if the issue involved an external source Do not use individual names. Use department names or Health Net Consider the following when drafting the issue for Medicare Compliance department review: Provider (also referred to as First Tier, Downstream or Related Entity (FDR)) may work with their Health Net business contact to determine the appropriate response. Who: What: When: Why: How: Were members impacted? How many members were directly/indirectly impacted? Which HN contracts were affected? What occurred? What systems failed? What oversight protocols were in place and/or will be put in place? When did the issue occur? When was the issue identified? When will the issue be resolved? (Provide an estimate) What are the key dates for addressing issue/resolving problem and to ensure follow up occurs? Remember to keep the dates realistic. Why did the issue occur? Why did the systems or processes fail? Why did existing oversight protocols fail? How were members impacted? How was the issue identified? How will the issue be resolved? How and when will members be contacted? (If access to benefits were denied members need to be contacted immediately). IMPORTANT: If you do not provide a manageable due date for completing Action Steps or Follow- Up items, CMS may assign one for you. 1 Date of Revision 10/22/2012

Name of Issue Contract Numbers Affected Select all that apply or to be determined (TBD) if not currently known: H0351 (AZ HMO) H0562 (CA HMO) H5439 (CA PPO) H3237 (Dual Eligible) H5520 (OR PPO) H6815 (OR HMO) TBD Executive Summary [Provide a short clear description (500 characters or three to four sentences) of the issue in plain English understandable to a lay person. Summary must be sufficient in content to ensure a recipient can completely understand the issue without having to read the rest of the document. This section may need to be updated as the issue is further investigated and a solution is implemented. Please note, the Executive Summary is specifically written for executives who need to have a basic understanding of the issue (e.g., brief statement of issue, members impacted, and when the issue was resolved) without having to read the entire issue write-up.] Requirement [Describe the regulatory or internal requirements that apply to the issue (e.g., Code of Federal Regulation (CFR), section of manual chapter, or policy and procedure number).] Background [Add section if applicable. This section summarizes relevant information needed to understand the issue. (e.g., describing a current process; explaining key elements).] Date Issue Identified [This is the date Health Net or a Health Net provider identified the non-compliant issue. For example: Health Net receives a member complaint on July 5 th. Health Net initiates a review of the issue and on July 8 th, determines it was caused by a plan set up error. The issue identification date is July 8 th.] Description of Incidence [Specifically describe the Who, What, When, and How of the incident. (e.g., were members impacted (Who); what occurred (What); when did the issue occur (When); and how were members impacted (How).] 2 Date of Revision 10/22/2012

Description of Similar Incidents [Include the name of the issue, a description of the issue, how the issues are similar, the solution implemented, and monitoring activities. For example, if the issue relates to a plan set up error, list other plan set up errors that were previously reported. If there were no similar incidents just note None known that are similar. ] Impact of Incidence [Add section if applicable. Include the final count of members impacted by the issue. If impact currently unknown, indicate TBD by <date>. Note: date should not be more than 30 days from date issue reported to Medicare Compliance. Provide justification if the impact information will not be available within this timeframe. As applicable, the final count should be broken down by: Low income subsidy (LIS) vs. non-lis members; Contract number; Plan benefit package (PBP); State; and County. Be prepared to provide a copy of the impact report if requested by Medicare Compliance. If an impact report is required, it must be a separate document, not attached to the issue write up form, and sent separately to only the assigned Medicare Compliance contact.] Root Cause Analysis [Describe the primary reason or cause for issue and the steps taken to reach that conclusion. This section describes why an issue occurred.] 3 Date of Revision 10/22/2012

Primary Root Cause Reason The check box below will allow you to select one of the pre-defined root cause reasons. Select only one: Benefit Configuration Error Contracting Deficient Monitoring/ Validation Process Deficient Procedures Deficient Training Formulary Set Up Error Human Error Implementation Error or Deficiency ITG Limitation Non-Communicated Changes Other System Error System Limitation System Programming Timing of Process Benefit input into a Health Net or provider database does not match the CMS approved bid or the employer group contract Contract between Health Net and provider or between provider and provider s downstream provider entity is inaccurate, incomplete or not Internal monitoring or validation process is inaccurate, incomplete or not P&P, desktop, standard operating procedure or workflow is inaccurate, incomplete or not Specialized operational training is inaccurate, incomplete or not Formulary placement input into a Health Net or provider database that does not match the CMS approved formulary, bid or employer group contract. Error that occurs when an individual s action causes an error. (e.g., procedure not followed, manual cut and paste error, or keying errors) New or revised regulatory requirement or internal business process implemented incorrectly or incompletely. No manual workaround and no system enhancement available due to Health Net or provider Information Technology Group (ITG). New or revised regulatory requirement or medications to internal business process not communicated to applicable staff, Health Net to provider or provider to Health Net. An issue source not otherwise defined. System is set up correctly, but is not working properly. System limitation does not allow for a particular change or medication. Computer system or application is not programmed correctly or Issues concurrent to a new or revised regulatory requirement or internal business process is being implemented retroactively. 4 Date of Revision 10/22/2012

Corrective Action Plan: (Provide a short summary of your plan to prevent recurrence of the deficiency.) Corrective Action Plan Tasks Task # Task Description Description of Validation/ Monitoring Activities Planned Completion Date 1 Status 2 Date Completed 3 1 Typical maximum timeframes for completing Corrective Action Plan tasks: Impact report: 5 calendar days from issue identification Benefit configuration: 14 calendar days from issue identification Revise/develop P&Ps, desktops or workflows approved and available to staff: 30 calendar days from issue identification Train on revised/new P&Ps, desktops or workflows: 45 calendar days from issue identification Revise/develop member materials: 14 calendar days from issue identification to submit materials via Alfresco, 30 calendar days to implement once materials are approved by Medicare Compliance or CMS Claim correction: 45 calendar days from issue identification IT system implementation: To be determined on a case-by-case basis Other: To be determined on a case-by-case basis Discuss with the Medicare Compliance contact if a Corrective Action Plan task will take longer than the typical timeframe. 2 Status options are limited to: Too Soon to Tell, On-Track, Delayed, and Closed. If delayed, an explanation must be provided including expected completion date. The Medicare Compliance contact will follow up on any tasks not closed as of the date of initial receipt. 3 Escalation Policy: Failure to meet the timelines will be subject to Health Net s escalation process. Per Health Net s policies Issue Identification, Tracking, Escalation & Resolution, # MD321-154443, section 9.d and Issue Identification, Tracking, Escalation & Resolution First Tier, Down Stream and Related Entities, # MD45-124554, section 7.d The Medicare Compliance Officer will escalate to Executive Management and the Board of Directors any reported issue that affects member access to care or well-being (including financial well-being) when the corrective action plan due date falls past due beyond 30 days. 5 Date of Revision 10/22/2012