AB20 Model Agreement Update AOA 2012 Annual Conference

Similar documents
UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS - UPDATE FEBRUARY 2015

Subcontract Monitoring

University of San Francisco Office of Contracts and Grants Subaward Policy and Procedures

Policy on Cost Allocation, Cost Recovery, and Cost Sharing

Outgoing Subagreements: Subawards and Subcontracts

Investigator s Disclosure of Economic Interests Addendum

OUTGOING SUBAWARD GUIDE: INFORMATION FOR UWM PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS VERSION 1, JULY 2015

Sponsored Programs Roles & Responsibilities

Sponsored Programs Roles & Responsibilities

Subrecipient vs. Contractor: Guidance on Appropriate Classification of Legal Relationship

Subrecipient Monitoring Procedures

Subaward Policies and Procedures Manual

RESTRICTED PROJECTS: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES May 2009

University of Colorado Denver

Sponsored Program Administration Policy Approved by Academic Senate on 4/4/06

Federal Rules for Sponsored Programs. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 2 CFR 200

SUMMARY. Extramural Funds Accounting effectively conducts post award financial management:

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES* FOR EXTERNAL AWARDS MADE TO DAVIDSON COLLEGE

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Policy for Cost Sharing and Matching Funds on Sponsored Projects Effective July 1, 1998

GRANTS AND CONTRACTS (FINANCIAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT)

Sponsored Projects: Curriculum Plan Johns Hopkins University Panel Members:

Grant Administration Glossary of Commonly-Used Terms in Sponsored Programs

Policy on Principal Investigators Duties and Responsibilities on Sponsored Projects

Subrecipient Profile Questionnaire

Office of Sponsored Programs Budgetary and Cost Accounting Procedures

Bloomfield College Grants Financial Management Policy

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION FINANCIAL ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES MATRIX - WORK IN PROGRESS 10/03/2013 Roles.

UC San Diego Policy & Procedure Manual

Trinity Valley Community College. Grants Accounting Policy and Procedures 2012

AN INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FOR GRANT RECIPIENTS. National Historical Publications and Records Commission

Award Transfer Guidelines

UC Davis Policy and Procedure Manual

XAVIER UNIVERSITY. Financial Conflict of Interest Policy-Federal Grant Proposals

The Lifecycle of a Sponsored Project

UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS. AOA Conference Sacramento, CA January 12, 2014

Are You Ready for This? The New Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200

Subrecipient Risk Assessment and Monitoring of Northeastern University Issued Subawards

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PAY FOR SUCCESS EVALUATION DESIGN. National Kidney Foundation of Michigan s Diabetes Prevention Program

Sponsored Programs and Research Compliance SUBRECIPIENT COMMITMENT FORM

SJSU Research Foundation

GRANT FUNDING AND COMPLIANCE POLICY

6666 W. Quincy Ave. Denver, CO (303) Fax: (303) GUIDELINES FOR FOCUS AREA PROGRAM PROPOSALS.

EXHIBIT A SPECIAL PROVISIONS

Cultural Competency Initiative. Program Guidelines

Ramp up and Wrap up projects. Riding the Wave to Close Out

45 CFR 75 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Health and Human Services Awards

Roles & Responsibilities UR Office of Research and Project Administration

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR PAY FOR SUCCESS CONSULTANT SERVICES

Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring

PREPARATION OF A SPONSORED PROPOSAL

The Rollout of OMB A-81 and its Effect on UH

INDIRECT COST POLICY

10 CFR 600: KNOW YOUR REQUIREMENTS

Grants Financial Procedures (Post-Award) v. 2.0

POLICY STATEMENT EFFECTIVE DATE

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY Financial Procedure Statements FPI 2-16

Children s Discovery Institute Grants Policies

Financial Oversight of Sponsored Projects

UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS

Proposal Submission Guidelines

Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) DIVISION I: AWARD COVER PAGES

Grant Terms. Abstract Summarizes the purpose, importance, and scope of the proposed project.

Subrecipient Monitoring Under 2 CFR 200. Kris Rhodes, MS Director, Higher Education Practice

Commonwealth Health Research Board ("CHRB") Grant Guidelines for FY 2014/2015

Graduate Grantsmanship Certificate Series Jo Ann Smith, Ph.D., CRA Joshua Roney, M.A.

Developing Proposal Budgets

Are You Ready for This? The New Uniform Grant Guidance 2 CFR 200

COST SHARING POLICY COST SHARING POLICY PAGE 1 OF 8

Department of Contracts, Grants and Financial Administration, Texas Education Agency 1/26/18

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE. Payments to Local Governments and Other Subrecipients

Request for Proposals (RFP) to Provide Auditing Services

Dept/ College. Dept/ College. Dept/ College

U. S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQUISITION ACTIVITY GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR ASSISTANCE AWARDS TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1 May 2008

APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH GRANT TITLE OF RESEARCH. Amount requested Dates of study: Begin End. Name. Title. Department. Name of Department Chair

Uniform Guidance Sponsored Projects Services

University of Pittsburgh SPONSORED PROJECT FINANCIAL GUIDELINE Subject: SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING

CHAPTER II FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. Budget Officers Meeting January 28, 2015

Performance and Financial Monitoring and Reporting

TOPIC: CONTRACTS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SECTION 17.0 PAGE 1 OF 49 EFFECTIVE DATE: JULY 1, 2018 REVISION #4: JULY 1, 2018

ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER

The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 A Guide to Risk-Based Grants Management

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER-AT-RISK

BASIC EDUCATION FOR ADULTS LEADERSHIP BLOCK GRANT

AURA Sponsored Projects Policies and Procedures

TOPIC: CONTRACTS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SECTION 17.0 PAGE 1 OF 38 EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 1, 2017 REVISION #4: MARCH 1, 2017

Administrative and Indirect Costs. What s the difference?

Grant Proposal Development Handbook

The OmniCircular - 2 CFR 200

Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (New Uniform Guidance)

Standard Operating Procedures for P209: Investigator Conflict of Interest Policy

Research Grants Program Office GRANT ADMINISTRATION MANUAL. Effective August 1, 2017

Eastern Michigan University. Office of Research Development and Administration (ORDA) Externally Sponsored Projects Procedures

National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Office of Grants and Financial Management Awards Management Division Updated April 15, 2014

Johns Hopkins University Research Administration (JHURA) Fall 2015

PART 34-ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS WITH FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS. Subpart A-General

Research Administration Services Roles & Responsibilities For Grants and Contracts (Excludes Clinical Trials) Version 3.1

ARMY RESEARCH OFFICE REPORTING INSTRUCTIONS

Sponsored Program Services. Ken Sandel Senior Director, Sponsored Program Services Date: August 18, 2016

Screen to Lead Program (SLP)

Transcription:

AB20 Model Agreement Update AOA 2012 Annual Conference 1 S U E D E R O S A, C S U C H A N C E L L O R S O F F I C E M I K E R O N D E L L I, S D S U R E S E A R C H F O U N D A T I O N A N D R E W B O U L T E R, U C O F F I C E O F T H E P R E S I D E N T J A N U A R Y 1 0, 2 0 1 2 W E S T I N, S A N F R A N C I S C O

AB20: Negotiation Status AB20 Model Agreement Terms Exhibit C UTC- XXXX Negotiation with DGS/State, UC and CSU representatives complete June 2011 (awaiting final approval of State agencies and DGS Director) 2 State and University Proposal and Administration Manual (SUPAM) Manual drafted to provide State and University systems with guidance on proposal, award and administrative processes Oct 2011 (in draft) Implementation of UTC-XXXX, Exhibit C Feb 29, 2012??

AB20: Outstanding Issues Implementing MOU not yet negotiated with DGS; possible issues include: Agreement on alternate patent language and process Applicability of AB20 Model agreement University interpretation is that it applies to ALL contracts; DGS interpretation that competitively bid projects may be excluded Finalizing UTC-XXXX, Exhibit C Invoicing and payment is still an issue Indirect Cost Still pending 3 Working on counter proposal to the latest response from State agencies (Merry Christmas to us) NEED YOUR HELP! Finalize SUPAM feedback welcome!

AB20: A new relationship 4 Use of the model agreement is predicated on a different working relationship with the State Campuses will provide complete proposals to the State prior to award Proposals will be reviewed in advance by university sponsored projects offices Proposal will contain more detail upfront, allowing for less detail to be required later, for example, with each invoice

AB20: Implementing MOU 5 The implementing MOU is drafted to outline the applicability of the AB20 model agreement and more Applies to all agreements between state agencies and UC/CSU campuses (CSU definition includes auxiliaries responsible for administration of sponsored projects) Identifies how DGS, CSU and UC will continue to work together to update/maintain the model agreement Provides process and language for one alternate provision (Patents)

AB20: A new structure 6 As a result of this new philosophy, the model agreement is contemplated (if not yet finalized) to be comprised of three documents acting in concert: The University Terms & Conditions (Exhibit C, UTC-XXXX) The standard agreement format (STD 213 & Exhibits) The State & University Proposal & Administrative Manual (SUPAM), including the budget workbook

AB20: The SUPAM The SUPAM is divided into three major sections Pre-award Proposal preparation and submission Level of detail in proposal Endorsement by sponsored projects office Award Structure of the basic award Proper use of the optional exhibits Use of mutually negotiated terms Post-award Prior approval/rebudeting Invoicing Close out 7

AB20: SUPAM Pre-award 8 Before any award is issued by a State agency, a formal proposal (endorsed by the authorized official at the campus) is submitted to the funding State agency A proposal will include at a minimum, a complete scope of work (Exhibits A-A6), and a budget (Exhibits B-B3) A proposal is not official without the concurrence of the sponsored projects office To assist our State colleagues in identifying when a proposal has been endorsed, we are proposing the use of a Proposal Cover Sheet

AB20: SUPAM Proposal Elements 9 Scope of Work Exhibit A Abstract and Scope of Work A complete description of the work to be done by the campus Exhibit A1 Deliverables A description of all items that are to be delivered to the funding State agency Include all reports, draft reports, software (including source code, if necessary) and data sets (if requested by the State) Be aware that the State will receive a NERF to every item listed as a Deliverable

AB20: SUPAM Proposal Elements (continued) 10 Exhibit A2 Key Personnel Defined as individuals who contribute to the scientific development or execution of the project in a substantive, measurable way, whether or not salaries are requested. PI and Proposing campus determine who is key within the project Exhibit A3 Contract personnel/notices Contact information for the authorized representatives Note that this follows the FDP subaward model

AB20: SUPAM Proposal Elements (continued) 11 Exhibit A4 Use of Preexisting Data, Copyrighted Works and Deliverables If the State s use of any Deliverable is restricted or is anticipated to contain preexisting data or copyrightable works with any restricted use, it will be clearly identified in Exhibit A4 along with the nature of the restriction Exhibit A5 CVs Exhibit A6 Current & Pending Support This exhibit ties to item #5 Conflict of Interest in the UTC It s included to allow State agencies to assess if a given investigator has an inherent conflict between the funding State agency and a regulatory agency Subsequent updates to Exhibit A6 are only at the agency s request

AB20: SUPAM Proposal Elements (continued) 12 Exhibit A7 (optional) Third Party Confidential Information Requirement If the scope of work requires the provision of third party confidential information to either the State or the Universities, then that information will be defined in Exhibit A-7 along with any requirement of the third party in the use and disposition of the confidential information. The third party may require a separate Confidential Nondisclosure Agreement (CNDA) as a requirement to use the confidential information. Any such CNDA will also be added to Exhibit A-7

AB20: SUPAM Proposal Elements (continued) Budget & budget workbook Exhibit B Budget 13 The budget is divided into a composite for all years and a year-byyear, budget category breakdown The itemized budget contains more detail than usually seen in State proposals, but similar in format to some federal proposals Only the composite budget will be included in the subsequent award (as Exhibit B). The budget worksheets for the individual years would be documentation for the proposal only Exhibit B1 Justification The justification will contain a narrative explanation of all the estimated costs in the budget Pay particular attention to explaining unusual items of cost and the need for them

AB20: SUPAM Proposal Elements (continued) Exhibit B2 Budget Estimates Pertaining to Subcontractors 14 A new requirement, but intended to secure approval for subs at proposal stage Exhibit B3 Invoice Elements Good news no more photocopying backup documentation! Required elements: Summary that shows approved budget, cumulative and current (invoice) period expenditures and balance available by approved budget category Part 2 Detailed transaction ledger that contains elements like account/object code, transaction date, description, reference and amount (including effort/time worked for payroll expenditures)* * May be a separate payroll ledger, if not included in detailed transaction ledger

AB20: SUPAM Award 15 Model agreement terms will be used for all new agreements executed on or after the implementation date. New agreement is defined as the award of funds, not previously budgeted or appropriated, by a funding State agency to the UC or CSU. A State agency funding an application submitted under the requirements of the SUPAM will use the model agreement format.

AB20: SUPAM Award Format 16 The model agreement has the following required forms and exhibits Standard Form (STD) 213 Contains all of the usual and required information for State agreements, including the name of the funding State agency, the contractor s name (the UC or CSU campus) the amount and period of the award, etc. Upon execution, it will bear the signatures of the Authorized Officials of the State agency and the UC or CSU campus as well as the endorsement of DGS, if necessary. Exhibits A-A5 These exhibits will be included in the agreement as transmitted in the proposal to the State. Any changes to Exhibits A-A5 will need to be coordinated and endorsed by the Authorized Official of the UC or CSU campus.

AB20: SUPAM Award Format (continued) Exhibits B-B2 17 The composite budget, budget justification and subrecipient budget(s), when applicable and as transmitted in the proposal to the State will be duplicated in the resulting Agreement. Any changes to Exhibits B-B2 will need to be coordinated and endorsed by the Authorized Official of the UC or CSU campus. Exhibit B3, invoice elements, will be incorporated into the Agreement, but will not be transmitted with the proposal package. Reversion of Funds The State shall provide University with fund reversion dates for each fiscal year identified on the Exhibit B Note Project completion date must be at least 90 days before funds reversion date. If the end date of the Agreement is less than 90 days from the funds reversion date, the project period may need to be renegotiated prior to Agreement execution to ensure payment of final invoice.

AB20: SUPAM Award Format (continued) 18 Exhibit C, UTC XXXX The model agreement terms and conditions will be maintained on the DGS Office of Legal Services, Standard Language website and will be included in the agreement by reference in Exhibit C. the language in the University Terms and Conditions (UTC) should not be altered in Exhibit C. Any mutually negotiated changes to the UTC should be rare and included in Exhibit H Negotiated Alternate UTC Terms

AB20: SUPAM Award Format (continued) Optional Exhibits 19 Exhibit A7 Third Party Confidential Information Requirement As noted earlier, if the scope of work requires the provision of third party confidential information to either the State or the Universities, then that information will be defined in Exhibit A-7 along with any requirement of the third party in the use and disposition of the confidential information including any nondisclosure Exhibit D Additional Requirements Associated with Funding Sources If the Agreement is subject to any additional requirements imposed on the funding State agency by applicable law (including, but not limited to, bond, proposition and federal funding), then these additional requirements will be set forth here If the University is a subrecipient, as defined in OMB Circular A-133, and the prime funding entity is the federal government, the name of the funding federal agency, the prime award number (if available), and the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) program number will also be listed

AB20: SUPAM Award Format (continued) Exhibit E Special Conditions for Security of Confidential Information 20 If a given scope of work or project results in additional legal and regulatory requirements regarding security of Confidential Information, those requirements regarding the use and disposition of the information, will be provided by the funding State agency Exhibit F Access to State Facilities and Computing Resources If a given scope of work or project requires that the Universities have access to State agency facilities or computing systems and a separate agreement between the individual accessing the facility or system and the State agency is necessary, then the requirement for the agreement and the agreement itself will be listed in Exhibit F.

AB20: SUPAM Award Format (continued) Exhibit G State Confirmatory License 21 Should the funding State agency request it, the standard State Confirmatory License can be included in the Agreement as Exhibit G Note: if Exhibit G is not incorporated, and the University discloses an invention under this Agreement and prosecutes a patent application, a State Confirmatory License will be executed by the University to provide said license to any such invention, within 90 days after filing of patent application. Exhibit H Negotiated Alternate UTC Terms AB20 allows for the terms of the UTC to be changed, but only through the mutual agreement and negotiation of the State agency and the University campus. If a given term in the UTC is to be changed, the change should not be noted in Exhibit C, but rather noted separately in Exhibit H

AB20: SUPAM Award Format (continued) 22 Exhibit H (continued) The model agreement contemplates only one standard alternate term, #19. Patents State Alternate. This term may be used only when an Agency determines that its statutory mission is better served by Agency ownership of inventions potentially created in the performance of a specific project To use #19. Patents State Alternate, the funding State agency must provide notice to the campus PI and Authorized Official of the UC or CSU of its intent to include the term and the supporting determination for inclusion of the term This notice and supporting determination must be provided after a proposal has been submitted to the funding State agency and before the formal agreement is issued

AB20: SUPAM Post-award Invoicing and Payment 23 The process for invoicing and payment is designed to follow the proposed/approved budget, providing sufficient detail to the state to approve payment but no copies of supporting documents Invoices submitted in arrears no less frequently than 90 days, no more frequently than 30 days Invoices will provide budget/actual expense information, a standard detail transaction report and a detailed payroll expense report (if details are not included in transaction rep) The invoice, ledger report and payroll expense report will need to be endorsed as valid by the PI If the funding State agency questions a given cost, the unquestioned costs will be paid while the university responds

AB20: SUPAM Post-award (continued) Budget Flexibility 24 Budget revisions between identified budget categories in cost reimbursement agreements that are within the total contract amount, comply with the prior approval requirements, above and do not change the Scope of Work or substitute Key Personnel are allowed as follows: Up to 10% of each annual budget amount or $10,000, whichever is less, is allowed with approval (could be after-the-fact) of the State s Contract Manager, or as otherwise agreed to by the Parties and documented on Exhibit B. Exceeding 10% or $10,000, whichever is less, of the last approved budget require the State s Contract Manager prior approval and may require a formal amendment to this Agreement The University will submit a revised budget to the State for approval.

AB20: SUPAM Post-award (continued) 25 Close Out At the termination of the agreement, the end date of the project period as listed on the STD 213, the following shall be provided to the funding State agency In the event that a given agreement terminates early, the procedures outlined in section 7 of the UTC will be followed Final Invoice The University shall submit the final invoice to the State, no later than 90 calendar days after the agreement completion date Final Report/Deliverables Any undelivered item listed on Exhibit A1 Deliverables, will be submitted to the funding State agency at the termination of the agreement

AB20: SUPAM Post-award (continued) Close Out (continued) Final Invention Disclosure (see section 19 Patent Rights of the UTC) 26 If in the performance of the Scope of Work, an invention is made (conceived and reduced to practice), then the University will provide a disclosure of that invention to the funding State agency Confirmatory License (if applicable) A State Confirmatory License will be executed by the University and provided to the funding State agency for any such invention made during the performance of the Scope of Work within 90 days after the University files the patent application

AB20: HELP WANTED - Budget Sample Proposal Budgets Using SUPAM as guide, prepare a sample budget w/budget justification using statefunded projects, if possible to include Project with subrecipients and consultants Project with off-campus rent/lease expense 27 Project with none of the above but with equipment (if available)

AB20: HELP WANTED F&A/IDC Indirect Cost Scenarios 28 On the sample budgets - apply different methodologies and rates federal methodologies and rate compared to proposed state base and rates Apply Federally negotiated F&A rate on federal MTDC base CSU/UC counter proposal rates of 45%, 40%, 35% 30% on: Federal MTDC Base State MTDC Base (same as Fed, but exclude consultants) Calculate indirect cost on TDC at: 30%; 25% and 20% Illustrate off-campus example with facility rental/lease Including other typical off-campus costs, like utilities, maintenance, etc. Use the 26% off-campus rate.