Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

Similar documents
CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Recent and Proposed Rule Changes for Meaningful Use

EHR/Meaningful Use

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Meaningful Use Stage 2

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

MEANINGFUL USE FOR THE OB/GYN. Steven L. Zielke, MD 6/13/2014

Overview of the Changes to the Meaningful Use Program Called for in the Proposed Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule April 27, 2018

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule

Proposed Rules for Meaningful Use 1, 2 and 3. Paul Kleeberg, MD, FAAFP, FHIMSS CMIO Stratis Health

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Meaningful Use. UERMMMC Medical Alumni Association Meeting July 17, David Nilasena, M.D., Chief Medical Officer CMS Region VI

Agenda. Meaningful Use: What You Really Need to Know. Am I Eligible? Which Program? Meaningful Use Progression 6/14/2013. Overview of Meaningful Use

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Game Plan. Meaningful Use Where are We? So is Anyone Registering? So, are EPs getting any money? $31,968,176,183

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements. Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013

Clinical Quality Measures Lessons Learned and a Look Forward to Stage 3

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

CMS Meaningful Use Stage 3 NPRM Elizabeth Holland Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program -- Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. Shay Surowiak, RN, BSN, CHTS-CP HIT Practice Advisor

= AUDIO. Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. An Important Reminder. Mission of OFMQ 9/23/2015. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Health Care IT Advisor. Meaningful Use 101. What You Need to Know August 26, Naomi Levinthal, MA, MS, CPHIMS Consultant, Health Care IT Advisor

AHA Survey on Hospitals Ability to Meet Meaningful Use Requirements of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Programs

Updates to the EHR Incentive Programs Jason Felts, MS, CSCS HIT Practice Advisor

Meaningful Use 2015 Measures

Final Meaningful Use Stage 3 Requirements Released August 2018

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Alaska Medicaid Program

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Updates October 2, 2012 Rick Hoover & Andy Finnegan

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Health Care IT Advisor. Meaningful Use. Adjusting to a New Normal. Naomi Levinthal. Future of Healthcare in Washington Bellevue, WA April 2, 2014

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee May 6, 2014

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Re: CMS Code 3310-P. May 29, 2015

Legal Issues in Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Programss

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

The History of Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Reporting period for 2017: Change: Any consecutive 90 days in 2017 for Medicaid customers only.

WHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component

Hospital IQR Program ecqm Reporting. November 7, 2013

during the EHR reporting period.

ASCs and Meaningful Use. Patrick Doyle, Vice President Sales Jessica McBrayer, RN, Business Analyst Ron Pelletier, Vice President Market Strategy

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Transcription:

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

Objectives Discuss major changes to Meaningful Use program for Stage 3 and impact on hospitals Identify steps to prepare for Stage 3 Summarize strategies to increase and maintain stakeholder engagement with Meaningful Use goals

2015 ONC HIT Certification Proposed Rule

Major Provisions Improve interoperability Facilitate accessibility and data exchange Provide ONC HIT Certification Program accessiblity to more types of health IT Support Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Address health disparities by expanding certification

Major Provisions (continued) Ensure all HIT possesses relevant privacy and security capabilities Improve patient safety Increase reliability and transparency of certified HIT Provide HIT developers with more flexibility and opportunities for certification

2015 EHR Certification EHR technology certified to either 2014 or 2015 edition will support attestation for Stage 1 or Stage 2 in 2017 All providers will be required to use 2015 Edition CEHRT for Stage 3 reporting Optional reporting in 2017 Required in 2018

Timeline Rule published: March 30, 2015 Where to review: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentdetail ;D=HHS_FRDOC_0001-0572 NOTE: This link allows you to view comments received to date. Comment period ends: 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 29, 2015

Stage 3 Meaningful Use Proposed Rule

History and Background 2009 ARRA signed into law 2011 Stage 1 reporting begins 2014 Stage 2 reporting begins 2017 Optional Stage 3 reporting begins 2010 2012 2015 2018 Stage 1 FR Stage 2 FR Stage 3 proposed Required Stage 3 reporting begins

Purpose of MU Aligns with National Quality Strategy aim to provide better care Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce health disparities Engage patients and families Improve care coordination Ensure adequate privacy and security protections for personal health info Improve population and public health

Meaningful Use Stages Stage 1 Clinical data capture Sharing of data with patient and other providers Stage 2 Incorporated advanced clinical practices, such as CDS and Care Coordination Finalized CQMs Stage 3 Build on groundwork of 1 & 2 Increase interoperability Focus on advanced use of EHR and improved outcomes Simplify reporting requirements and reduce program complexity

Stage 3 Proposed Rule Major Provisions Streamlined approach for Stage 3 Further alignment with other CMS quality reporting programs Stage 3 intended to be last stage of Meaningful Use Reduced complexity

Final MU Stage Annual changes affecting EHR Incentive Program would be made in future rulemaking Reporting for Stage 3 is optional for all providers in 2017; required for all in 2018

Streamlined Approach All provider in first year of demonstrating MU would report on CY beginning in January 2017 Exception: Medicaid providers in 1 st year All providers would be required to attest based on a full year of data for a SINGLE set of MU objectives and measures Optional in 2017 Required in 2018

Streamlined Approach (continued) Proposing a set of 8 objectives with associated measures: Protect Patient Health Information Electronic Prescribing Clinical Decision Support Computerized Order Entry Patient Electronic Access to Health Information Coordination of Care through Patient Engagement Health Information Exchange Public Health and Clinical Data Registry Reporting

Stage 3 Objectives & Measures 1) Protecting PHI protect electronic PHI created or maintained by CEHRT through implementation of appropriate technical, administrative, and physical safeguards Measure: Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with requirements under 45 CFR 164.308(a)(1) Including addressing the security (including encryption) of data stored in CEHRT Implement security updates as necessary Correct identified security deficiencies NPRM, pages 63-66

Stage 3 Objectives & Measures (continued) 2) eprescribing maintain Stage 2 objective with increased threshold (generate and transmit permissible discharge prescriptions) Measure: >25% of hospital discharge med orders for permissible prescriptions (new and changed) are queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT NPRM, pages 67-74

Stage 3 Objectives & Measures (continued) 3) Clinical Decision Support - Implement clinical decision support (CDS) interventions focused on improving performance on high-priority health conditions. Measure 1: Implement 5 CDS interventions related to 4 or more CQMs at a relevant point in patient care for entire EHR reporting period. Absent 4 CQMs related to patient population, CDS interventions must be related to high-priority health conditions. Measure 2: The EH/CAH has enabled and implemented functionality for drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks for entire EHR reporting period. NPRM, pages 75-81

Stage 3 Objectives & Measures (continued) 4) CPOE - Use CPOE for medication, lab, and diagnostic imaging orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional or credentialed MA (or equivalent), who can enter orders into EHR per state, local, and professional guidelines. Measure 1: During EHR reporting period, >80% of med orders created during ED or IP stay are recorded using CPOE Measure 2: During EHR reporting period, >80% of lab orders created during ED or IP stay are recorded using CPOE Measure 3: During EHR reporting period, >80% of diagnostic imaging orders created during ED or IP stay are recorded using CPOE NPRM, pages 81-89

Stage 3 Objectives & Measures (continued) 5) Patient Access to ephi - EH/CAH provides access for patients to view online, download, and transmit PHI or retrieve PHI through an API, within 24 hours of its availability. Measure 1: For >80% of all unique patients discharged from EH/CAH IP or ED: Patient or representative is provided access to view online, download, and transmit PHI within 24 hrs of its availability; OR Patient or representative is provided access to ONC-certified API that can be used by third-party applications/devices to provide patients/representatives access to their PHI, within 24 hours of its availability. Measure 2: EH/CAH must use clinically relevant information from CEHRT to identify patient-specific educational resources and provide electronic access to those materials to >35% of unique patients discharged from EH/CAH IP or ED during EHR reporting period

Stage 3 Objectives & Measures (continued) 6) Care Coordination - Use communications functions of CEHRT to engage with patients or representatives about patient's care. Measure 1: During EHR reporting period, >25% of all unique patients discharged from EH/CAH IP or ED actively engage with EHR made accessible by provider. Measure 2: For >35% of all unique patients discharged from EH/CAH IP or ED during EHR reporting period, a secure message was sent using electronic messaging function of CEHRT to the patient or representative, or in response to a secure message sent by patient or representative. Measure 3: Patient-generated health data or data from a non-clinical setting is incorporated into CEHRT for >15% of all unique patients discharged by EH/CAH IP or ED during EHR reporting period.

Stage 3 Objectives & Measures (continued) 7) Health Information Exchange EH/CAH provides a summary of care record (SOCR) when transitioning or referring patient to another setting of care, retrieves a SOCR upon first patient encounter with a new patient, and incorporates SOCR from other providers into their EHR using functions of CEHRT. Measure 1: For >50% of transitions of care (TOC)/referrals, EH/CAH that transitions/refers patient to another setting/provider of care (1) creates SOCR using CEHRT; and (2) electronically exchanges SOCR. Measure 2: For >40% of TOC/referrals received and patient encounters in which provider has never before encountered patient, EH/CAH incorporates into patient's EHR an electronic SOCR from a source other than provider's EHR system. Measure 3: For >80% of TOC/referrals received and patient encounters in which provider has never before encountered patient, EH/CAH performs a clinical information reconciliation. Medication Medication allergy Current Problem List

Stage 3 Objectives & Measures (continued) 8) Public Health and Clinical Data Registry EH/CAH is in active engagement with PHA or CDR to submit electronic public health data in a meaningful way using CEHRT, except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice. MEASURES FOR OBJECTIVE 8: PUBLIC HEALTH AND CLINICAL DATA REGISTRY REPORTING OBJECTIVE Measure Max. # of times measure can count Measure 1 Immunization Registry Reporting 1 Measure 2 Syndromic Surveillance Reporting 1 Measure 3 Case Reporting 1 Measure 4 Public Health Registry Reporting 4 Measure 5 Clinical Data Registry Reporting 4 Measure 6 Electronic Reportable Lab Results 1

Alignment EHR reporting period Eliminate current 90-day reporting period for those demonstrating MU for first time Create single CY reporting period Better alignment with CMS quality reporting programs Allows for single attestation reporting period

Alignment (continued) EHR reporting for adjustment year Stage 3 Rule eliminates the exception for a 90 day EHR reporting period for new meaningful EHR users beginning with the EHR reporting period in 2017 Reporting period for a payment adjustment year will be the full calendar year that is 2 years before the payment adjustment year (for EPs and EHs) EHR reporting period for 2017 incentive payments would be full 2017 calendar year

Alignment (continued) Proposing removal of measures that are topped out In both MU measures and CQMs Further alignment to be addressed in future rulemaking

General Changes Changes to Payment Adjustments Statute requires Medicare payment adjustment beginning in 2015 Propose to maintain all payment adjustment provisions finalized in the Stage 2 rule Exception; change to the relationship between the EHR reporting period year and the payment adjustment year for CAHs

General Changes (continued) Changes to Payment Adjustments Propose to maintain four categories of exceptions Lack of internet availability A time-limited exception for newly practicing EPs or new hospitals Unforeseen circumstances such as natural disasters (EP only) exception EP at multiple locations with lack of control over the availability of CEHRT at practice locations constituting 50 percent or more of their encounters

CQM Updates CQM reporting Electronic submission encouraged in 2017 Required electronic submission in 2018 Alignment to CY will create 3-month gap in reporting(october 1 December 31, 2016) CQMs may still be required

CQM Updates (continued) CQM reporting Stage 3 ecqm measure sets & reporting requirements will be published in annual IPPS ruling Will include reporting requirements, methods, and submission periods

Timeline Rule published: March 30, 2015 Where to review: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentdetail ;D=CMS-2015-0033-0002 NOTE: This link allows you to view comments received to date. Comment period ends: 11:59 p.m., EDT on May 29, 2015

2016 IPPS Proposed Rule

CQM Reporting Continue to report 16 of 28 IP measures Topped out measures will be retained for ecqm reporting Minimal burden Monitor effectiveness of ecqm reporting Appropriate to understand differences in chart-abstracted and electronic quality measures Impacted measures STK-6 STK-8 VTE-1 VTE-2 VTE-3

CQM Reporting (continued) CMS recognizes that measure rates between chart-abstracted and electronically captured measures may not be the same Electronic submission Helps evaluate variations Determines needed adjustments

CQM Reporting (continued) Reporting required for HIQR beginning with Q3 CY 2016 Six measures may be reported via chart-abstracted submission or electronic CQM submission ED-1 ED-2 STK-4 VTE-5 VTE-6 PC-01 Hospitals may choose to submit by either method If reporting via chart abstraction - must be reported for full year If electronic reporting, may report on Q3 and Q4 and measures will count as 6 of the 16 required for ecqm reporting

CQM Reporting (continued) Public reporting will be delayed Measure reported electronically will be footnoted (1) the hospital submitted data via EHR (2) data are being processed and analyzed (3) CMS will eventually publicly report this data once CMS determines the data to be reliable and accurate Timeline for public reporting will be addressed in future rulemaking

Future Considerations Use of core clinical data elements derived from EHRs for use in future quality measures For example, risk adjustment of outcome measures Collection of additional administrative linkage variables to link a patient s episode of care from EHR data with his administrative claim data Use of content exchange standards

Timeline Rule published: March 30, 2015 Where to review: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentdetail ;D=CMS-2015-0049-0004 NOTE: Comments are not displayed Comment period ends: 11:59 p.m., EDT on June 16, 2015

Preparing for Stage 3

Preparing for Stage 3 and Beyond Review Rules and COMMENT Validation of CQMs PARTICIPATE! Do not minimize importance of security measures Encrypted data storage Audit logs Timely installation of software security updates Regular SRAs

Preparing for Stage 3 and Beyond (continued) Be aware of challenges eprescribing increases from 50 to 80% Diagnostic imaging added to CPOE Patient access to health information Stage 3 no longer requires that a certain % of patients actually take action, but must be able to access within 24 hours

Stakeholder Engagement Involve in all aspects of MU Decision makers or Followers? Champions Educate, Educate, Educate

CMS published 2016 CQM logic in early May Significant changes aimed at improving accurate representation of patient care Currently performing impact analysis OVERVIEW: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 11:30 a.m., CDT

Thanks for attending. Are there any questions? Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead carla.mccorkle@xerox.com