Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Similar documents
Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

EHR/Meaningful Use

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Meaningful Use Stage 2

during the EHR reporting period.

The History of Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

Eligible Professional Attestation Worksheet for Modified Stage 2 Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

Meaningful Use Reporting period for 2017: Change: Any consecutive 90 days in 2017 for Medicaid customers only.

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

Game Plan. Meaningful Use Where are We? So is Anyone Registering? So, are EPs getting any money? $31,968,176,183

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Alaska Medicaid Program

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

New Hampshire Guidelines for Program Year 2016: Meaningful Use and Clinical Quality Measure Supporting Documents

Recent and Proposed Rule Changes for Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

GE Healthcare. Meaningful Use 2014 Prep: Core Part 1. Ramsey Antoun, Training Operations Coordinator December 12, 2013

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

Agenda. Meaningful Use: What You Really Need to Know. Am I Eligible? Which Program? Meaningful Use Progression 6/14/2013. Overview of Meaningful Use

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

Meaningful Use: Today and in the Future VMGMA Spring Conference Richmond, VA March 21, 2016

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Eligible Professionals. How can the West Virginia Health Information Network (WVHIN) assist you in meeting Meaningful Use requirements?

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements. Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

Updates to the EHR Incentive Programs Jason Felts, MS, CSCS HIT Practice Advisor

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Professionals

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. Shay Surowiak, RN, BSN, CHTS-CP HIT Practice Advisor

Meaningful Use 2015 Measures

Meaningful Use Roadmap

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

Part 3: NCQA PCMH 2014 Standards

Transcription:

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2 Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Wait! Where did Stage 1 and Stage 2 go? Traditional stages eliminated in late 2015 in order to: 1. reduce reporting requirements 2. align reporting periods with calendar year 3. modify patient engagement measures

Traditional Stages of MU First Year of MU Stage of Meaningful Use 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 2012 1 1 2 2 2 3 2013 1 1 2 2 3 2014 1 1 2 2 2015 1 1 2 2016 1 1

New Stages of MU First Year of Meaningful Use Stage of Meaningful Use 2016 2017 2018 2011 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3 2012 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3 2013 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3 2014 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3 2015 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3 2016 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3

Reporting Periods 2016 proposal on table for 90 days for all EPs in 2016 at present: any 90 consecutive days for new EPs full calendar year for all others 2017+ full calendar year (???) for all Medicare EPs (including new EPs) MU replaced by Advancing Care information in MIPS

Core 1 - CPOE Core 2 - erx Core 3 - Demographics Protect Patient Health Information Core 4 - Vital Signs Clinical Core 5 - Smoking Decision Status Support Core 6 - Clinical Decision Support Computerized Core 7 - Incorporate Clinical Provider Lab-Test Results Order Entry Core 8 - Patient Lists Electronic Core 9 - Preventative Prescribing Care Core 10 - Patient Electronic Access Health Information Exchange Core 11 - Clinical Summaries Core 12 - Patient Specific Educational Resources Patient Specific Education Core 13 - Medication Reconciliation Core 14 - Summary of Care Medication Reconciliation Core 15 - Immunization Registries Data Submission Patient Electronic Access Core 16 - Protect Electronic Health Information Core 17 - Secure Electronic Messaging Secure Menu 1 - Syndromic Electronic Surveillance Messaging Menu 2 - Electronic Notes Public Menu 3 - Imaging Health Results Reporting Menu 4 - Family Health History Menu 5 - Report Cancer Cases Menu 6 - Report Specific Cases Modified Stage 2 Reorganization

Protect Patient Health Information Proposed Objective Protect patient health information created or maintained by the CEHRT through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities. Proposed Measure Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements in 45 CFR 164.308(a)(1), including addressing the security (to include encryption) of data stored in Certified EHR Technology in accordance with requirements in 45 CFR 164.312(a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR 164.306(d)(3), and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the EP s risk management process Exclusions None

SRA can be performed anytime during the calendar year as long as it is completed by the day of attestation. Failure to perform SRA remains the #1 reason for audit failure Essentials of the Security Risk Analysis webinar with MetaStar

Clinical Decision Support Proposed Objective Use clinical decision support to improve performance on high-priority health conditions Proposed Measures 1. Implement five clinical decision support interventions related to four or more clinical quality measures at a relevant point in patient care for the entire EHR reporting period 2. The EP has enabled and implemented the functionality for drug-drug and drug allergy interaction checks for the entire EHR reporting period Exclusions Any EP who writes fewer than 100 medication orders during the EHR reporting period can exclude from measure 2

Clinical Decision Support CDS - Rules CDS - Interaction Checks

Computerized Provider Order Entry Proposed Objective Use computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for medication, laboratory, and diagnostic imaging orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional who can enter orders into the medical record per state, local, and professional guidelines 1. More than 60 percent of medication orders created by the EP during the EHR reporting period are recorded using computerized provider order entry Proposed Measures 2. More than 30 percent of laboratory orders created by the EP during the EHR reporting period are recorded using computerized provider order entry 3. More than 30 percent of radiology orders created by the EP during the EHR reporting period are recorded using computerized provider order entry Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2016 Any EP who writes fewer than 100 medication, laboratory, or diagnostic imaging orders during the EHR reporting period can exclude from that measure Proposed Measure: More than 60 percent of medication orders created by the EP during the EHR reporting period are recorded using computerized provider order entry Providers due for Stage 1 in 2016 can exclude from measures 2 and 3 as they do not exist in Stage 1

Computerized Provider Order Entry Scoring for Labs and Radiology controlled by Orders - Medical:

Electronic Prescribing Proposed Objective Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (erx) Proposed Measure More than 50 percent of all permissible prescriptions, or all prescriptions, written by the EP are queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using Certified EHR Technology 1. Any EP who writes fewer than 100 permissible prescriptions during the EHR reporting period Exclusions 2. An EP who does not have a pharmacy within his or her organization and does not have a pharmacy that accepts electronic prescriptions within 10 miles of the EP's practice location at the start of his or her EHR reporting period

Health Information Exchange Proposed Objective The EP who transitions their patient to another setting of care or refers their patient to another provider of care provides a summary care record for each transition of care or referral The EP that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care: Proposed Measure 1. uses CEHRT to create a summary of care record 2. electronically transmits the summary to a receiving provider for more than 10 percent of transitions of care and referrals Exclusions Any EP who refers a patient to another provider less than 100 times during the EHR reporting period

Health Information Exchange

Patient-Specific Education Proposed Objective Use clinically relevant information from Certified EHR Technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide those resources to the patient Proposed Measure Patient-specific education resources identified by Certified EHR Technology are provided to more than 10 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period Exclusions Any EP who has no office visits during the EHR reporting period

Patient-Specific Education 1 2

Medication Reconciliation Proposed Objective The EP who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliation Proposed Measure The EP performs medication reconciliation for more than 50 percent of encounters with new patients and inbound transitions of care. Exclusions Any EP who saw no new patients and was not the recipient of any transitions of care during the EHR reporting period

Medication Reconciliation What if my patient tells me they aren t taking medications? What if all my patients are kids and don t take meds? = Travel to a different country Travel to a new provider When a new patient enters the practice, there s an expectation that we use an official, standardized document to coordinate their care

Medication Reconciliation Denominator all new patients automatically included inbound referrals need TOC Document Received box checked Numerator number of patients in denominator who have Medication reconciliation performed box checked

Patient Electronic Access Proposed Objective Provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit their health information within 4 business days of the information being available to the EP An EP must meet both measures: Proposed Measures 1. More than 50 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period are provided timely (within 4 business days after the information is available to the EP) online access to their health information 2. At least one patient seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period (or their authorized representatives) views, downloads, or transmits his or her health information to a third party Any EP who: 1. Neither orders nor creates any of the information listed for inclusion as part of the measures; or Exclusions 2. Conducts 50 percent or more of his or her patient encounters in a county that does not have 50 percent or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the EHR reporting period (www.broadbandmap.gov). (for 2nd measure only)

Patient Electronic Access Measure 1 establish PHR credentials sign encounter within 4 business days Measure 2 promote use of the PHR to have patients View, Download, or Transmit their information V/D/T links available in About Me or Appointments area of PHR

Secure Electronic Messaging Proposed Objective Use secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant health information Proposed Measure For at least 1 patient seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period, a secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of CEHRT to the patient (or the patient-authorized representative), or in response to a secure message sent by the patient (or the patient-authorized representative) during the EHR reporting period. Any EP who: 1. has no office visits during the EHR reporting period, or Exclusions 2. conducts 50 percent or more of his or her patient encounters in a county that does not have 50 percent or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the EHR reporting period (www.broadbandmap.gov)

Secure Electronic Messaging

Public Health Reporting Proposed Objective The EP is in active engagement with a PHA or CDR to submit electronic public health data in a meaningful way using certified EHR technology, except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice Proposed Measures There are a total of 3 possible measures for this objective. EPs are required to choose from measures 1 through 3, and are required to successfully attest to active engagement with any combination of two measures Exclusions 3 available for each measure + broad availability for Syndromic Surveillance and Specialized Registry Reporting

Public Health Reporting What is Active Engagement? The EP is moving toward the submission of real patient data. This can be demonstrated 1 of 3 ways: 1. Completed registration with a registry within 60 days after the start of reporting period 2. Testing of data submission process initiated 3. Actively submitting patient data

Public Health Reporting Exclusions Do not count as satisfying a measure i.e. EP can exclude from Immunization Registry Reporting on grounds that they didn t perform any immunizations during reporting period but it will not count as 1 of the 2 measures they need to meet. Alternate exclusions possible for Syndromic Surveillance and Specialized Registry Reporting if you attest to fact that you did not plan to participate in the previous Stage 2 menu measure CMS FAQ 14397: https://goo.gl/otwncg 2016 Bottom Line: you ll either fully exclude, or exclude from Immunizations and Syndromic Surveillance but claim engagement with a Specialized Registry like AOA MORE

Summary Reporting periods 2016: any 90 consecutive days for new EPs, full year for all others proposal on table for 90 days for all EPs. Continue as originally scheduled until finalized 2017: full year (???) for all EPs (including new EPs) in Advancing Care Information MU in 2016 involves 10 objectives Key Info V/D/T Actual Use still at at least 1 patient Secure Messaging now measures messages you send to unique patients. Need to send a message to at least 1 Broad exclusions from Public Health Reporting still possible Providers in first year of MU in 2016 should try to complete attestation prior to October 1 to avoid a 3% penalty in 2017

Next 4:30 to 5:30 PM Peer to Peer Roundtable Discussions