Meaningful Use: Today and in the Future VMGMA Spring Conference Richmond, VA March 21, 2016

Similar documents
Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

EHR/Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Under the MACRAscope:

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

Meaningful Use Stage 2

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Game Plan. Meaningful Use Where are We? So is Anyone Registering? So, are EPs getting any money? $31,968,176,183

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

The History of Meaningful Use

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

Meaningful Use Reporting period for 2017: Change: Any consecutive 90 days in 2017 for Medicaid customers only.

Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

during the EHR reporting period.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

Proposed Rules for Meaningful Use 1, 2 and 3. Paul Kleeberg, MD, FAAFP, FHIMSS CMIO Stratis Health

Meaningful Use 2015 Measures

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

Agenda. Meaningful Use: What You Really Need to Know. Am I Eligible? Which Program? Meaningful Use Progression 6/14/2013. Overview of Meaningful Use

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid CMS Updates. Christol Green, Anthem Inc.

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Recent and Proposed Rule Changes for Meaningful Use

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. Shay Surowiak, RN, BSN, CHTS-CP HIT Practice Advisor

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements

Copyright. Last updated: September 28, 2017 MicroMD EMR Objective Measure Calculations Manual: Performance Year 2017

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

= AUDIO. Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. An Important Reminder. Mission of OFMQ 9/23/2015. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Updates to the EHR Incentive Programs Jason Felts, MS, CSCS HIT Practice Advisor

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physicians Offices March 2014

Alaska Medicaid Program

HITECH Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Stimulus Package. HITECH Act Meaningful Use (MU)

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physicians February 2013

June 15, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt,

Transcription:

Meaningful Use: Today and in the Future VMGMA Spring Conference Richmond, VA March 21, 2016

Agenda-Three Timeframes 2015 Meaningful Use: hardship exception process 2016-2017 Challenging Requirements Made Easier with Flexibility Final Rule 2017+: A look Ahead at Stage 3, MACRA, and the wildcard issue MU Tips Resources Q/A

Meaningful Use 2015: Avoiding the 2017 Penalty

2015 Round-Up: Attestation and Hardship Exception Applications Attested for 2015 meaningful use by March 11. Submit a 2015 hardship exception application by July 1. What s special about 2015? Due to delay of the modifications rule, Congress/CMS created a blanket, streamlined exception process. Applies to every provider, even those who never applied to program or don t have an EHR system. Forms require less information & no supporting documentation. One form may be submitted for all of the providers in the group. Applications will receive an expedited, automatic review. Submitting a hardship application will NOT nullify incentive $$.

Hardship Application Process Review the hardship exception instructions and access the exception application form. Note below: no CEHRT # required

Avoiding the 2017 Penalty: 2.2.d

FAQ on 2.2.d CMS also released an FAQ to provide additional guidance specific to sub-category 2.2.d: This category can be used for issues related to the 2015 rulemaking timeline and is included under the existing category for extreme and uncontrollable circumstances related to the implementation and use of certified EHR technology. Providers who experienced an issue with their CEHRT related to the rule timing and any other provider for whom the timing of the rule caused a significant hardship should select sub-category 2.2.d on the 2017 hardship exception application. No additional documentation is required for this selection.

CMS FAQ Question: If I submit a hardship exception application by the March 15, 2016 deadline, does that mean that I cannot attest for the 2015 EHR reporting period and possibly receive an incentive pay? Answer: No. Submission of a hardship exception application does not prevent a provider from attesting and receiving an incentive payment if meaningful use requirements are met.

New Hardship Exception CMS recent FAQ: The FAQ addresses the question of whether or not providers that have switched EHR vendors can apply for a hardship exception to avoid the Medicare payment adjustment. Answer: yes, EP may apply for an Extreme and/or Uncontrollable Circumstances hardship exception and if approved may be exempt from the payment adjustment.

The Penalty Phase Year/Program erx PQRS Meaningful Use Value Modifier 2012-1.0% 2013-1.5% 2014-2.0% 2015-1.5% -1.0% -1.0% 2016-2.0% -2.0% -2.0% 2017-2019 -2.0% -3.0 5%* (each year) * Penalty amount could increase up to 5% depending on meaningful use success rates and discretion of HHS Amount TBD

2015-2017 MU Flexibility Final Rule and 2016 Reporting

Pathway to Flexibility EP Stage 2 success minimal Significant pressure on CMS from MGMA and many others in a broad coalition Coalition helped introduce bipartisan Flex-IT Act requiring 90-day reporting Dr. Conway Jan 29, 2015 blog signal CMS Releases Proposed Rule April 10, 2015 Final rule no later than Aug comes out Oct.6, 2015 (after start of last 90-day reporting period)

Final Rule Key Provisions 10 core reporting obj (incl. new public health obj.) Previously 17 core and 3 menu objectives Redundant and topped out objectives were eliminated Reduced patient action measure thresholds Patient electronic access (view, download, transfer) objective 5% of patients 1 patient (at least 50% provided access) Secure messaging objective 5% patients 1 patient (up from demonstrating capability in 2015) Hospitals move to calendar year reporting

Reporting Periods 2015 2016 2017 2018 EHR Reporting Periods All providers attest to EHR reporting period of any continuous 90-day period within calendar year First-time participants may use EHR reporting period of any continuous 90-day period between January 1 and December 31, 2016 All returning participants must use EHR reporting period of full calendar year (January-December 31, 2016) First-time participants may use EHR reporting period of any continuous 90-day period; providers attesting to Stage 3 may also use 90-day reporting period All returning participants must use EHR reporting period of full calendar year (January- December 31, 2017) First-time Medicaid participants may use 90-day EHR reporting period All other providers must use EHR reporting period of full calendar year (January 1- December 31, 2018)

The following objectives are no longer required to be reported: Record Demographics Record Vital Signs Record Smoking Status Clinical Summaries Structured Lab Results Patient List Patient Reminders Summary of Care Measure 1 Any Method Measure 3 Test Electronic Notes Imaging Results Family Health History

New List of MU Requirements 1. Protect Patient Health Information 2. Clinical Decision Support 3. CPOE 4. Electronic Prescribing (erx) 5. Health Information Exchange 6. Patient Specific Education 7. Medication Reconciliation 8. Patient Electronic Access (VDT) 9. Secure Messaging 10. Public Health and Clinical Data Registry Reporting

MU Objectives 1. Protect PHI Conduct or review a security risk analysis, address security and encryption of ephi, implement security updates as necessary, and correct identified security deficiencies 2. Clinical Decision Support (CDS) 5 rules relative to 4 or more CQMs Enable drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction 3. Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) More than 60% Medication order More than 30% Radiology orders More than 30% Laboratory orders

MU Objectives (cont d) 4. Electronic Prescribing (erx) More than 50 percent of permissible prescriptions written by the EP are queried for a drug formulary AND transmitted electronically 5. Health Information Exchange (HIE) Any EP who refers a patient to another provider or transitions a patient to another setting must: Use CEHRT to create a Summary of Care record, and Electronically transmit the Summary of Care record to a receiving provider for more than 10 percent of referrals and transitions of care CMS is aware that many EPs do not have DIRECT e-mail addresses but did not lower threshold

MU Objectives (cont d) 6. Patient Education More than 10 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period are given patient specific education resources that were identified by CEHRT 7. Medication Reconciliation The EP performs medication reconciliation for more than 50 percent of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP

MU Objectives (cont d) 8. Patient Electronic Access Measure 1: More than 50 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period are provided timely access to view online, download, and transmit to a third party their health information subject to the EP's discretion to withhold certain information Measure 2: At least 1 patient seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period (or patient-authorized representative) views, downloads, or transmits his/her health information to a third party during the EHR reporting period

MU Objectives (cont d) 9. Secure Messaging The capability for an EP and patient to send and receive a secure electronic message must be fully enabled during the EHR reporting period. At least 1 patient uses SM.

Stage 2: Public Health 10.The EP is in active engagement (registered, testing, or production) with a public health agency to submit electronic public health data from CEHRT. EP must meet 2 of the following: Measure 1: the EP is in active engagement with a public heath agency to submit immunization data Measure 2: the EP is in active engagement with a public heath agency to submit syndromic surveillance data (menu previously) Measure 3: the EP is in active engagement to submit data to a specialized registry (menu previously) Exclusions are available for each measure. If no measures remain available, the EP can meet the objective by claiming applicable exclusions for all measures. Challenge: vendor fees to connect with registries

PH Reporting Exclusions In 2016, everyone must attest to two measures. An EP can be excluded from reporting to an Immunization registry if he/she: Does not administer any immunizations; or Operates in a jurisdiction for which no immunization registry is able to accept data; or Operates in a jurisdiction where no immunization registry has declared readiness to receive data. An EP can be excluded from Syndromic Surveillance reporting if he/she: Operates in a jurisdiction that does not collect data from their category of providers; or Operates in a jurisdiction for which agency is not able to accept data; or Operates in a jurisdiction where agency has not declared readiness to receive data. An EP can be excluded from Specialized Registry reporting if he/she: Does not diagnose or treat any disease associated with or collect relevant data that is required by a specialized registry; or Operates in a jurisdiction for which no registry is able to accept data; or Operates in a jurisdiction where no registry has declared readiness to receive data. CMS: The EP is not required to make an exhaustive search

Stage 2 Requirements Clinical quality measures (no change) 9 measures out of 64, covering at least three domains None are required but some are recommended Zero in the denominator is a positive response Can report through the PQRS Portal Note that the CQM reporting period can be different than the rest of MU

Leading Cause of Failing an MU Audit

Security RA Requirement Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements under 45 CFR 164.308(a)(1), including addressing the encryption/security of data stored in CEHRT in accordance with requirements under 45 CFR 164.312 (a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR 164.306(d)(3), and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the provider s risk management process.

RA Challenges Although conducting a risk analysis has been required since 2005 (HIPAA Security final rule), not all practices have conducted one RA delves into areas of the practice that staff typically do not have expertise (i.e., network security, encryption) Many practices have focused on privacy, not RA One of the few MU requirements that the EHR vendor cannot completely address without significant practice input Hiring a consultant to conduct a RA is costly

Risk Analysis Tips t Don t assume your RA will be conducted by your EHR vendor (without additional cost) Talk to colleagues-how did they conduct their RA? Do assume that you will be audited Document everything RA-related (hard-copy or e- binder) Review the available resources (i.e., MGMA, HHS) Consider outside help (especially for a narrow set of issues (i.e., mobile tech, security for remote access to EHR)

Resources at mgma.org HIPAA Security Risk Analysis Toolkit Adobe PDF Link to RA tool developed by ONC and OCR MGMA and OCR Sample Notices of Privacy Practices Sample Business Associate Agreement MGMA Webinars Laptops, Tablets, Smartphones and HIPAA: An Action Plan to Protect your Practice HIPAA Omnibus Rule: A practical approach for physician practices

The Future: Stage 3 and MACRA

The Death of Meaningful Use? We are now in the process of ending Meaningful Use and moving to a new regime culminating with the MACRA implementation.the Meaningful Use program as it has existed, will now be effectively over and replaced with something better. - Acting Administrator Andy Slavitt, J.P. Morgan Annual Health Care Conference (Jan. 11, 2016) Connecting Healthcare with Legal Excellence SM Copyright 2015. Medical Group Management Association (MGMA ). All rights reserved. 2016 Oscislawski LLC

The Inevitable Clarification The current law requires that we continue to measure [MU] under the existing set of standards.while MACRA provides an opportunity to adjust payment incentives it does not eliminate it, nor will it instantly eliminate all the tensions of the current system. [O]ur existing regulations including meaningful use Stage 3 are still in effect. - Acting Administrator Andy Slavitt & Acting Assistant Secretary for Health Karen DeSalvo (Jan.19, 2016) Connecting Healthcare with Legal Excellence SM Copyright 2015. Medical Group Management Association (MGMA ). All rights reserved. 2016 Oscislawski LLC

The Future of Meaningful Use 2016 2017 2018 Reporting period Full-year; 90 consecutive days for new EPs Full-year; 90 consecutive days for new EPs and those electing to move to Stage 3 Full-year MU stage All EPs in Stages 1 or 2 EPs can elect to move to Stage 3 All EPs must move to Stage 3 Penalty 3-4% 3-5% 3-5%

Stage 3-the Big Picture Voluntary in 2017 for EPs 90-day reporting in 2017 Mandatory in 2018 for all EPs and all year reporting for most Significant push back from MGMA, other associations, Congress All calling for stage 3 to be delayed CMS opened up Oct. 2015 rule for an additional comment period CMS suggested S3 changes incl in MIPS NPRM

Stage 3 looks a different than 2016 Stage 2 No core and menu measures, just options for many of the 8 reporting areas ( flexible measures) Reporting will be 1year (except for 1st year Medicaid) CQMs will be reported electronically; no chart abstraction or paper based measures Increased thresholds for many measures (i.e., back to 5% for VDT or API and SM) Patient-generated data from a nonclinical setting must be incorporated into the EHR for more than 5% of patients seen by the EP

Removal of Measures Original measures that are removed are either topped out (i.e., standards have been widely adopted as best practices) or appear elsewhere in MU reporting and are considered redundant for reporting purposes. Same as 2015 Flex final rule list

Stage 3 Objectives 1. Protect Patient Health Information 2. Clinical Decision Support 3. Patient Access to Health Information (5%) 4. Health Information Exchange 5. Electronic Prescribing 6. CPOE 7. Coordination of Care Through Patient Engagement 8. Public Health & Clinical Data Registry Reporting

MACRA

MACRA Basics Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) (April 16, 2015) Repealed Medicare sustainable growth rate (SRG) formula Sunsets EP payment adjustments at the end of 2018 Establishes two payment tracks: Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Alternative Payment Model (APM) MIPS consolidates PQRS, MU and Value-Based Payment Modifier (VBPM) into single program

MACRA: The Basics 2016-2018 2019 onward Last performance year 2016?? PQRS Value-Based Payment Modifier Meaningful Use MIPS (Merit-Based Incentive Payment System) Score comprised of four performance categories: - Quality - Resource use - Clinical practice improvement - Meaningful use of EHR First performance year 2017?? OR APMs* (Alternative Payment Models) TBD, examples include: - PCMHs - Bundled payment models - CMMI models - ACOs * Non-qualifying APMs will receive favorable scoring in MIPS

MIPS Composite Score

MIPS Adjustment/Bonuses Based on composite performance score EPs may receive an upward, downward or no payment adjustment Exceptional Performers see significant opportunities for additional bonuses/adjustments on top of traditional MIPS incentives Available in 2019 through 2024 42

The 2017 WildCard

2016 election

MU TIPS

Audit Tips Three government agencies can audit a practice for RA s CMS (Figliozzi), OCR, and OIG (new) TIPS Review documentation for each measure and for every year an incentive payment was received Save dated screen shots that establish that the EPs successful met a particular measure Retain documentation to support the attestation for six years Consider conducting a mock audit

MU Tips Remove deleted measures from your dashboard Select the portal technology that best meets the needs of your practice/your patients Offer what the patients want (registration, scheduling, bill payment, lab results, refills, questions answered) Remember that for Patient Engagement Objectives #3 (CPOE), #6 (Patient Educ), and #9 (SM), patient actions may count towards the numerator of any provider in the practice who saw that patient during the reporting period. Develop a reasonable long-term IT and IT security strategy Look at patient engagement as a marketing tool

MU Tips Pick the right software for your practice, not necessarily the cheapest Carefully review ROI (cost/penalties vs incentives) Remember that MIPS/APM intersect with MU Leverage your professional networks and learn from your colleagues MU will change over the next few months and years keep up or fall behind! Keep up on all MU changes through MGMA

Thank you! Robert Tennant rtennant@mgma.org

MGMA Resources: mgma.org/meaningfuluse How to avoid the 2017 penalty Overview of the 2015 MU modifications final rule Overview of the Stage 3 final rule Meaningful Use FAQs: What MGMA Members are Asking Meaningful Use Incentive Program Checklist Member-benefit webinar: Meaningful Use Stage 2 Webinar-CMS presents EHR Incentive Programs: Getting to Meaningful Use Webinar CMS walks participants through the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive programs

CMS Resources EHR Incentive Stage 3 and Modification Rule 2015-2017 https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2015-25595.pdf 2015 EHR Incentive Program Requirements https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and- Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/2015ProgramRequirements.html Hardship Exception https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and- Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/PaymentAdj_Hardship.html EHR Incentive Program Website https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service- Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/valuebasedpaymentmodifier.html National Institutes of Health http://www.nih.gov/health/clinicaltrials/registries.htm National Quality Registry Network (NQRN) http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/physician-consortiumperformance-improvement/nqrn.page