FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Similar documents
Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

EHR/Meaningful Use

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Meaningful Use Stage 2

during the EHR reporting period.

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Eligible Professional Attestation Worksheet for Modified Stage 2 Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program

Alaska Medicaid Program

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

The History of Meaningful Use

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Meaningful Use Reporting period for 2017: Change: Any consecutive 90 days in 2017 for Medicaid customers only.

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

THE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE UNDER HIPAA/HITECH

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Eligible Professionals. How can the West Virginia Health Information Network (WVHIN) assist you in meeting Meaningful Use requirements?

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

Game Plan. Meaningful Use Where are We? So is Anyone Registering? So, are EPs getting any money? $31,968,176,183

HIE and Meaningful Use Stage 2 Matrix

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Eligible Professional Core Measure Frequently Asked Questions

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

New Hampshire Guidelines for Program Year 2016: Meaningful Use and Clinical Quality Measure Supporting Documents

Recent and Proposed Rule Changes for Meaningful Use

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

EHR Meaningful Use Guide

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals Q Update from 2013 HIE Survey Participants

Part 3: NCQA PCMH 2014 Standards

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 12 of 16 Date issued: May 2013

Meaningful Use and How it Relates to the Quality Payment Program. Erin Dormaier, CHTS-IM, PCMH CCE Transformation Support Services Manager

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

ecw and NextGen MEETING MU REQUIREMENTS

June 15, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt,

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

Transcription:

Meaningful Use s All Eligible Professionals (EP) and Eligible Hospitals (EH) must attest to all objectives using a 2014 Edition CEHRT. Protect Electronic Health Information Protect electronic health information created or maintained by the CEHRT through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities. None None EP/EH/CAH Yes/No Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements in 45 CFR 164.309(a)(1), including addressing the security (to include encryption) of data stored in CEHRT in accordance with requirements in 45 CFR 164.312(a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR 164.306(d)(3), and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the EP s or EH s risk management process. Clinical Decision Support Use clinical decision support to improve performance on highpriority health conditions. EP/EH/CAH 5 ea./ Yes/No In order for EPs/EHs/CAHs to meet the objective they must satisfy both of the following measures: Measure 1: Implement five (5) clinical decision support interventions related to four or more (4+) clinical quality measures at a relevant point in patient care for the entire EHR Absent four (4) clinical quality measures related to an EP/EH/CAH s scope of practice or patient population, the clinical decision support interventions must be related to high priority health conditions. Measure 2 Exclusion: Any EP who writes fewer than 100 medication orders during the EHR For an EHR reporting period in 2015 only, an EP/EH/CAH who is scheduled to participate in Stage 1 in 2015 may satisfy the following in place of measure 1: Alternate Measure 1: Implement one (1) clinical decision support rule relevant to specialty or high clinical priority, or high-priority hospital condition, along with the ability to track compliance with that rule. Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Use computerized provider order entry for medication, laboratory, and radiology orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional who can enter orders into the medical record per state, local and professional guidelines. The EP/EH/CAH has enabled and implemented the functionality for drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks for the entire EHR reporting EP/EH/CAH 60%/30%/30% An EP/EH/CAH, through a combination of meeting the thresholds and exclusions (or both), must satisfy all three measures for this objective. Measure 1: More than 60% of medication orders created by the EP or by authorized providers of the EH/CAH s Measure 1 Exclusion: Any EP who writes fewer than 100 medication orders during the EHR Measure 2 Exclusion: Any EP who writes fewer than 100 laboratory orders during the EHR Alternate Measure 1: More than 30% of all unique patients with at least one (1) medication in their medication list seen by the EP or admitted to the EH/CAH s inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period have at least one (1) medication order entered using CPOE; or more than 30% of medication orders created

during the EHR reporting period are recorded using CPOE. More than 30% of laboratory orders created by the EP or by authorized providers of the EH/CAH s during the EHR reporting period are recorded using CPOE. Measure 3: More than 30% of radiology orders created by the EP or by authorized providers of the EH/CAH s during the EHR reporting period are recorded using CPOE. Measure 3 Exclusion: Any EP who writes fewer than 100 radiology orders during the EHR EHs must meet all three measures. by the EP during the EHR reporting period, or created by the authorized providers of the EH/CAH for patients admitted to their inpatient or emergency departments (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period, are recorded using CPOE. Alternate Exclusion for Providers scheduled to be in stage 1 in 2015 may claim an exclusion for measure 2 (laboratory orders) of the Stage 2 CPOE objective for an EHR reporting period in 2015; and providers scheduled to be in stage 1 in 2016 may claim an exclusion for measure 2 of the Stage 2 CPOE objective for an EHR reporting period in 2016. Electronic Prescribing Electronic Prescribing Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (erx). Generate and transmit permissible discharge prescriptions electronically (erx) EP 50% More than 50% of all permissible prescriptions, written by the EP are queried for a drug formulary are transmitted electronically using CEHRT. EH/CAH 10% More than 10% of hospital discharge mediation orders for permissible prescriptions (for new and changed prescriptions) are queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT. Any EP who: 1. Writes fewer than 100 permissible prescriptions during the EHR reporting period; or 2. Does not have a pharmacy within his or her organization and there are no pharmacies that accept electronic prescriptions within 10 miles of the EP s practice location at the start of his or her EHR Any EH/CAH that does not have an internal pharmacy that can accept electronic prescriptions and is not located within 10 miles of any pharmacy that accepts electronic prescriptions at the start of their EHR Alternate Exclusion for Measure 3: Providers scheduled to be in Stage 1 in 2015 may claim an exclusion for measure 3 (radiology orders) of the Stage 2 CPOE objective for an EHR reporting period in 2015; and, providers scheduled to be in Stage 1 in 2016 may claim an exclusion for measure 3 of the Stage 2 CPOE objectives for an EHR reporting period in 2016. Alternate Measure: For Stage 1 providers in 2015, more than 40% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are transmitted electronically using CEHRT. The EH/CAH may claim an exclusion for the erx objective and measure if for an EHR reporting period in 2015 and 2016 if they were either scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1, which does not have an equivalent measure, or if they are scheduled to

Health Information Exchange (Summary of Care) Patient Specific Education Patient Specific Education Medication Reconciliation Patient Electronic Access (VDT) The EP/EH/CAH that transitions their patient to another setting of care or provider of care or refers their patient to another provider of care provides a summary care record for each transitions of care or referral. Use clinically relevant information from CEHRT to identify patientspecific education resources and provide those resources to the patient. Use clinically relevant information from CEHRT to identify patientspecific education resources and provide those resources to the patient. The EP/EH/CAH who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliation. Provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit their health information within four (4) business days of the information being available to the EP EP/EH/CAH 10% The EP/EH/CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care that 1) uses CEHRT to create a summary of care record, and 2) electronically transmits such summary to a receiving providers for more than 10% of transitions of care and referrals. EP 10% Patient-specific education resources identified by CEHRT are provided to patients for more than 10% of all unique patients with office visits seen by the EP during the EHR EH/CAH 10% More than 10% of all unique patients admitted to the EH s inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) are provided patient specific education resources identified by CEHRT. EP/EH/CAH 50% The EP/EH/CAH performs medication reconciliation for more than 50% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP or admitted to the EH s inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23). EP 50%/at least 1 Measure 1: More than 50% of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period are provided timely (within four (4) business days after the information is available to the EP) online access to their health information subject to the EP s discretion to withhold certain information. For an EHR reporting period in 2015 and 2016, at least one (1) patient seen by the EP during the EHR EP Exclusion: Any EP who transfers a patient to another setting or refers a patient to another provider less than 100 times during the EHR Any EP who has no office visits during the EHR reporting None EP Exclusion: Any EP who was not the recipient of any transitions of care during the EHR There is no EH exclusion for this objective. Any EP who: 1. Neither orders nor creates any of the information listed for inclusion as part of the measures, or 2. Conducts 50% or more of his or her patient encounters in a county that does not have 50% or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the EHR demonstrate Stage 2 but do not select the Stage 2 erx objective for an EHR reporting period in 2015 and 2016. Provider may claim an exclusion for the Stage 2 measure that requires the electronic transmission of a summary of care document if for an EHR reporting period in 2015, they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1, which does not have an equivalent measure. EP may claim an exclusion if for an EHR reporting period in 2015 they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1 but did not intend to select the Stage 1 Patient Specific Education menu objective. EH/CAH may claim an exclusion if for an EHR reporting period in 2015 if they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1 but did not intend to select the Stage 1 Patient Specific Education menu objective. Provider may claim an exclusion for the measure of the Stage 2 Medication Reconciliation objective if for an EHR reporting period in 2015 they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1 but did not intend to select the Stage 1 Medication Reconciliation menu objective. Alternate Exclusion EP may claim an exclusion for the second measure if for an EHR reporting period in 2015 they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1, which does not have an equivalent measure.

reporting period (or their authorized representatives) views, downloads, or transmits his or her health information to a third party. Patient Electronic Access Provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit information about a hospital admission. For an EHR reporting period in 2017, more than 5% of unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period (or his or her authorized representatives) view, download or transmit to a third party their health information during the EHR EH/CAH 50%/at least 1 Measure 1: More than 50% of all patients who are discharged from the inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) of an EH have their information available online within 36 hours of discharge. For an EHR reporting period in 2015 and 2016, at least one (1) patient who is discharged from the of an EH (or his or her authorized representative) views, downloads, or transmits to a third party his or her information during the EHR reporting Any EH/CAH that is located in a county that is located in a county that does not have 50% or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the EHR Alternate Exclusion Providers may claim an exclusion for the second measure if for an EHR reporting period in 2015 they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1, which does not have an equivalent measure. Secure Electronic Messaging Use secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant health information. For an EHR reporting period in 2017, more than 5% of unique patients discharged from the inpatient or emergency departments (POS 21 or 23) of an eligible hospital or CAH (or patient authorized representative) view, downloaded or transmit to a third party their information during the EHR EP Yes/No For an EHR reporting period in 2015, the capability for patients to send and receive secure electronic message with the EP was fully enabled during the EHR For an EHR reporting period in 2016, for at least 1 patient seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period, a secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of CEHRT to the Any EP who: 1. Has no office visits during the EHR reporting period, or 2. Conducts 50% or more of his or her patient encounters in a county that does not have 50% or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the EHR An EP may claim an exclusion for the measure if for an EHR reporting period in 2015 they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1, which does not have an equivalent measure.

patient (or the patient-authorized representative), or in response to a secure message sent by the patient (or the patient-authorized representative) during the EHR Public Health and Clinical Data Registry (CDR) Reporting The EP/EH/CAH is in an active engagement with a public health agency to submit electronic public health data from CEHRT, except where prohibited and in accordance with applicable law and practice. EP/EH/CAH EP = 2 measures in 2015, 2016, 2017 EH/CAH = 3 measures in 2015, 2016, 2017 For an EHR reporting period in 2017, for more than 5% of unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period, a secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of CEHRT to the patient (or the patient-authorized representative), or in response to a secure message sent by the patient (or the patientauthorized representative) during the EHR An EP scheduled to be in Stage 2 in 2015 must meet 2 measures. All EPs must meet 2 measures in 2016 and 2017. EH/CAHs scheduled to be in Stage 2 in 2015 must meet three measures. All EH/CAHs in 2016 and 2017 must meet 3 measures. Active Engagement is 1. Completed registration to submit data, 2. Testing and validation, or 3. Production Measure 1 Immunization Registry Reporting: The EP/EH/CAH is in active engagement with a PHA to submit immunization data to a public health immunization registry/immunization information systems (IIS). Measure 2 Syndromic Surveillance Reporting: EP/EH/CAH is in active engagement with a PHA to submit syndromic surveillance data from a nonurgent care ambulatory setting for EPs or an emergency or urgent care department for EHs (POS 23). Measure 3 Specialized Registry Reporting Measure 1 Exclusions 1. Any EP/EH/CAH that does not administer any immunizations to any of the populations for which data is collected by the jurisdiction s immunization registry or IIS during the EHR reporting period, 2. Any EP/EH/CAH that operates in a jurisdiction for which no immunization registry or IIS is capable of accepting the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period, or 3. Any EP/EH/CAH that operates in a jurisdiction where no immunization registry or IIS has declared readiness to receive immunization data from the EP/EH/CAH at the start of the EHR Measure 2 Exclusions: 1. Any EP that does not treat or diagnose or directly treat any disease or condition associated with a syndromic surveillance system in his or her jurisdiction, 2. Any EH/CAH that does not have an emergency or urgent care department, 3. Any EP/EH/CAH that operates in a jurisdiction for which no PHA is capable of receiving electronic syndromic surveillance data from EPs and EHs in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period, or EPs scheduled to be in Stage 1: Must attest to at least 1 measure from the Public Health Reporting Measures 1-3. May claim an Alternate Exclusion for Measure 1, Measure 2, or Measure 3. An Alternate Exclusion may only be claimed for up to two measures, then the provider must either attest to or meet the exclusion requirements for the remaining measure described in 495.22 (e)(10)(i). EPs scheduled to be in Stage 2: Must attest to at least 2 measures from the Public Health Reporting Measures 1-3. May claim an alternate exclusion for Measure 2 or Measure 3 (Syndromic Surveillance Measure or Specialized Registry Reporting Measure) or both.

The EP/EH/CAH is in active engagement to submit data to a specialized registry. Measure 4 Electronic Reportable Laboratory Result (ELR) Reporting (EH/CAH only): The EH/CAH is in active engagement with a PHA to submit ELR results. 4. Any EP/EH/CAH that operates in a jurisdiction where no PHA has declared readiness to receive syndromic surveillance data from EPs and EHs at the start of the EHR Measure 3 Exclusions: 1. Any EP/EH/CAH that does not treat or diagnose any disease or condition associated with, or collect relevant data that is collected by, a specialized registry in their jurisdiction during the EHR reporting 2. Any EP or EH that operates in a jurisdiction for which no PHA is capable of receiving electronic case reporting data from EPs and EHs in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period, or 3. Any EP or EH that operates in a jurisdiction where no specialized registry for which the EH/CAH is eligible has declared readiness to receive electronic registry transactions at the beginning of the EHR reporting Measure 4 Exclusions: 1. Any EH/CAH that does not perform or order laboratory tests that are reportable in their jurisdiction during the EHR reporting period, 2. Any EH/CAH that operates in a jurisdiction for which no PHA is capable of accepting the specific ELR standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period, 3. Any EH/CAH that operates in a jurisdiction where no PHA has declared readiness to receive ELR results from EHs at the start of the EHR