The DoD Strategic Plan for Test and Evaluation Resources

Similar documents
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)

2011 Ground Robotics Capability Conference. OSD Perspective

2011 Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective

Army Fiscal Programming For Equipment

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY. There are no restrictions on release of this publication.

Enabling Greater Productivity

17 th ITEA Engineering Workshop: System-of-Systems in a 3rd Offset Environment: Way Forward

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

DOD DIRECTIVE E ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM (CBDP)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Capabilities Overview

Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/DDR&E

DoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap

The DoD T&E/S&T Program

Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective. February 7, Anthony J. Melita

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Corporate Services Employment Report: January Employment by Staff Group. Jan 2018 (Jan 2017 figure: 1,462) Overall 1,

Test and Evaluation/ Science and Technology (T&E/S&T) Program

The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Systems Engineering & LRASM

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

CHIEF NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU INSTRUCTION

Air Force IR&D Program

Program Manager Training Systems PM 203

Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) Perspective

JOINT RAPID ACQUISITION CELL

Presentation to the Advanced Planning Briefing for Industry. Dr. Dale Klein

Development Planning Working Group Update

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

National Exercise Program (NEP) Overview. August 2009

Gerry Christeson Test Resource Management Center 20 October 2010

Beyond Phase II Conference RIF Overview

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) Challenges & Opportunities

Enlisted Professional Military Education FY 18 Academic Calendar. Table of Contents COLLEGE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION AND TRAINING (CDET):

Improving the Department of Defense Services Acquisition Tradecraft What s New in 2017

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Defense Industrial Base Predictive Analysis System

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

SUMMARY OF REVISIONS This document is substantially revised and must be completely reviewed.

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #164

FY16 Spend - DoD as Funding Dept Services = 51% of Obligations

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Deputy Chief Management Officer (DCMO) of the Department of Defense

Oversight of DoD Test and Evaluation (T&E) Resources

Navy JCTD Workshop. Building a Competitive Proposal and. the U.S. Navy Service Selection Process. OPNAV N8F S&T (Science & Technology Branch)

Fiscal Year 2017 President s Budget Request for the DoD Science & Technology Program April 12, 2016

USTRANSCOM. USTRANSCOM Research, Development, Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise. 15 April Mr.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Navy ManTech Program. ManTech Update. Tom Hite CTC 15 October 2014

BRAC 2005 Issues. Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group. December 12, 2003

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

ASMC National 2016 PDI. June 1-3, 2016

Advance Questions for Mr. Kenneth J. Krieg

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #222

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

ADUSD Program Support Contract Support in Contingency Operations

a. To promulgate policy on cost analysis throughout the Department of the Navy (DON).

REFERENCE MANUAL. Headquarters, USAF Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution System Training Program

Joint Science and Technology Office

FY 2011 Annual Report on Cost Assessment Activities

Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE TEST AND EVALUATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

DoD Mentor Protégé Program. Shannon C. Jackson, Program Manager DoD Office of Small Business Programs

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Wildfire Integration for Civil Support (UAS-WICS) Quick Reaction Test (QRT) Overview Brief

Testing in a Joint Environment: Implementing the Roadmap. Mr. Mike Crisp Deputy Director, Air Warfare Operational Test and Evaluation December 2005

JANUARY 2018 (21 work days) FEBRUARY 2018 (19 work days)

STRL Update 13 May 2016

CBDP BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

DOD INSTRUCTION DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS

Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Program

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #92

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

Picatinny BRAC 05 Information Briefing for ICAP

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE


Mr. James Hondo Geurts Deputy Director for Acquisition United States Special Operations Command

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF NOTICE

BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PUBLIC NOTICE ANNUAL NOTICE OF CALENDAR YEAR 2018 WORKSHOP SESSIONS, PRE-AGENDA MEETINGS AND REGULAR MEETINGS

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #163

Transcription:

The DoD Strategic Plan for Test and Evaluation Resources Mr. Jason Coker Mr. Christopher Paust March 4, 2009 Test Resource Management Center 1225 South Clark Street, Arlington VA 22202

Outline TRMC Background TRMC Mission & Roles Organizational Structure Strategic Planning Purpose Strategic Plan Publication Date Realignment Strategic Plan Development Process Influence on CTEIP, T&E S&T, Service/Agency Investments Working Groups and the Reliance Process Summary 2

TRMC Background The December 2000 Defense Science Board s review of DoD s major range and test facilities identified a number of issues regarding inadequate funding, management, and support of these test ranges and facilities To address these issues, Congress, via the 2003 NDAA, directed: the Services to fully fund the DoD Test Range institutional cost the SecDef to establish a DoD-level resource management organization DoD Directive (DoDD) 5105.71 established the TRMC as a DoD field activity under the authority, direction, and control of the USD(AT&L) 3

TRMC Mission, Vision, and Goal DoDD 5105.71 Mission: "Plan for and assess the adequacy of the MRTFB [and] to provide adequate testing in support of development, acquisition, fielding, and sustainment of defense systems; and, maintain awareness of other T&E facilities and resources, within and outside the Department, and their impacts on DoD requirements." Vision: The DoD T&E ranges and facilities will be fully capable of supporting the Department with quality products and services in a responsive and affordable manner. Goal: Robust and flexible T&E capabilities to support the Warfighter. 4

Roles and Missions of the TRMC NDAA Title X Sec 231 NDAA NDAA FY03 FY03 Established Established TRMC TRMC DoD DoD Field Field Activity Activity Direct Direct Report Report to to USD(AT&L) USD(AT&L) SES Director Oversee Oversee DoD DoD T&E T&E Budgets: Budgets: MRTFB MRTFB Other Other DoD DoD T&E T&E Facilities Facilities Biennial Biennial 10-Year 10-Year Strategic Strategic Plan Plan Administer Administer T&E T&E Investment Investment Programs: Programs: CTEIP CTEIP T&E T&E // S&T S&T Annual Annual T&E T&E Budget Budget Certification: Certification: Military Military Departments Departments & Defense Defense Agencies Agencies 5

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS) DIRECTOR MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY DIRECTOR, TEST RESOURCE MGMT CENTER DIR, ACQUISITION RESOURCES & ANALYSIS DIRECTOR, INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION DIRECTOR, SPECIAL PROGRAMS DIRECTOR, AT&L ADMINISTRATION EXEC DIRECTOR, DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (ACQUISITION & TECHNOLOGY) ATSD NUCLEAR, CHEMICAL & BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAMS DIRECTOR DEFENSE RESEARCH & ENGINEERING DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (LOGISTICS & MATERIEL READINESS) DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE INSTALLATIONS & ENVIRONMENT DUSD, INDUSTRIAL POLICY DATSD, NUCLEAR MATTERS DUSD, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ADUSD, TRANSPORTATION POLICY ADUSD, INSTALLATIONS DIR, PORTFOLIO SYSTEMS ACQUISITION DATSD, CHEM/BIO DEFENSE DUSD, ADVANCED SYSTEMS & CONCEPTS ADUSD, MATERIEL READINESS & MAINTENANCE POLICY ADUSD, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY & OCC. HEALTH DIR, SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS DATSD, CHEMICAL DEMIL AND THREAT REDUCTION DUSD, LABORATORIES & BASIC SCIENCES ADUSD, LOGISTICS PLANS & STUDIES DIR, INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT DIR, SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE ENGINEERING DIR, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY DIR, DEFENSE ADV RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY ADUSD, SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION DIR, OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT DIR, DEFENSE PROCUREMENT & ACQ. POLICY DIR, DEFENSE CONTRACT MGMT AGENCY DIR, JT. ADV CONCETPS PRESIDENT, DAU DUSD, INTERNATIONAL SECURITY DIRECTOR, PLANS & PROGRAMS DIR, RAPID REACTION TECHNOLOGY OFFICE DIR, PROGRAM SUPPORT DIR, DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY DIR, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DUSD, BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION DIRECTOR, JRAC DIRECTOR, HUMAN CAPITAL INITIATIVES 6

TRMC Organization Principal Deputy Vacant Director Test Resource Management Center Dr. John Foulkes Deputy Director Strategic Planning Suzanne Strohl Deputy Director Joint Investment Program & Policy Acting: George Rumford Deputy Director Test Resources Kevin Hannon Deputy Director* Test Infrastructure Fred Myers Policy Investment Accounts Test Capabilities Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Operating Accounts Site Visits & Assessments Central Test & Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) Workforce Test & Evaluation/Science & Technology (T&E / S&T) TRMC Annual Review and Report 7

Strategic Planning Purpose Provides a vision of the capabilities and investments needed to support the testing of future weapons systems Provides guidance for the planning, programming, budgeting and execution of T&E resources Influences Services T&E POM Investments through the DoD T&E Budget Certification process The strategic plan must eventually consider all available T&E capabilities: DoD T&E (MRTFB) Governmental non-dod Commercial International 8

Strategic Planning Purpose (con t) Near-term plans will focus on MRTFB and migrate to addressing the broader spectrum of T&E Drive the Services Needs and Solutions Reliance process Guides TRMC Science and Technology (S&T) and Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) investments to support DoD T&E Strategic Plan gaps 9

Strategic Planning Looks at ALL T&E Resources T&E Workforce T&E Processes DMS MF SIL HWIL ISTF OAR T&E Infrastructure Facilities Buildings Equipment Networks Range Space Funding T&E Capabilities T&E Resources: A collective term that encompasses the requisite Workforce, Infrastructure and Funding resulting in a T&E Capability, by means of the T&E Processes 10

Major Range and Test Facilities Base (MRTFB) 11

DoD Strategic Plan for T&E Resources and the PPBE Cycle ODD EVEN ODD EVEN ODD BC BC TRMC Budget Cert Budgeting FY 10 Congress Appropriation & Authorization IPLs JPG Memo Issue FG PBR Inst POM, FYDP BES to OSD IPLs PBDs PDMs Bdgt Lock DoD Bdgt Pres Bdgt FY 10-15 Start EPP Programming Planning Field QDR RdMps JPG I - VIII Formal Component POM Build Issues PBR Start SPG Rev SPG QDR NMS NSS Final SPG CJCS UCP 06 Data Call Svcs Build N&S Panel Evals BoD N&S To Svcs Joint N&S - TRMC CTEIP Props - TRMC RACS To TRMC Reliance Process N & S POM Develop RACS ODD EVEN ODD EVEN 2011 ODD Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec FY EVEN YEAR FY ODD YEAR FY EVEN YEAR FY ODD Year PPBE Documents are Drivers for the Strategic Plan Data Call Svcs Build N&S Panel Evals BoD N&S To Svcs Joint N&S - TRMC CTEIP Props - TRMC RACS To TRMC Reliance Process N & S POM Develop RACS SP Supports Budget Issues, PBDs, and T&E Budget Certification SP Influences the POM SP Influences Services Reliance N&S Process DoD Strategic Plan Develop SP Phase S P FY EVEN YEAR FY ODD YEAR FY EVEN YEAR Develop SP Phase S P FY ODD YEAR 12

Realignment of the Biennial Strategic Plan 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Dec 02 NDAA 03 Establishes TRMC Publish 2005 Strategic Plan Publish 2007 Strategic Plan Publish 2009 Strategic Plan Publish 2010 Strategic Plan SP Service and Agency Working Group Notification Establish SP PPBE Realignment Plan in collaboration with Services Influence forward to the 2012 and subsequent even year POMs 13

Advantages for Realignment Supports OSD, Services, and Agencies PPBES and POM processes Supports Services and Agencies Reliance Needs and Solutions Process Established MOA Brings a purple flavor to the process Provides a top down perspective to the historically bottoms up process Synergy through aligned investments 14

The Strategic Planning Process BRP DPS DPP DTAP FDG FEG JWSTP NDS NMS SPG QDR GDF GEF UCP Review Service/OSD Strategic Plans TARA Reviews Review ACTD Master Plan Focus Area Working Groups T&E/S&T Roadmaps Review DARPA Strategic Plan T&E Workshops, Conferences, and Symposia Range Visits AG BES CPR CP FG IPL IP&B JPG N&S PB P&B REV PBD PDM POM RACS Reliance Panel Participation Range Visits T&E Workshops, Conferences, and Symposia Review Service T&E Roadmaps PEO Discussions TEMP Reviews T1 Reviews R-2 Reviews T&E Gaps INVESTMENTS Service POM CTEIP T&E S&T POM Build Strategic Assessment of T&E Requirements Tactical Assessment of T&E Requirements T&E REQUIREMENTS T&E REQUIREMENTS Current T&E Capabilities Database 15

Building the Strategic Plan PMA Top-Down Inputs DPG I&M Reviews SPG Service Briefs TPG MRTFB Annual Review JPG QDR S&T TARA Reviews BRAC Reliance Process Etc. Requirements Assessment & Analysis 1. 1. Directed Directed Energy Energy 2. 2. Nuclear Nuclear Weapons Weapons Effects Effects 3. 3. Hypersonics Hypersonics 4. 4. Distributed Distributed Test/Cyber/IO Test/Cyber/IO 5. 5. Urban Urban Environments Environments 6. 6. Unmanned Unmanned & & Autonomous Autonomous Systems/Maritime Systems/Maritime Surveillance Surveillance 7. 7. IED IED Defeat Defeat 8. 8. Biometrics Biometrics 9. 9. Space Space 1. 1. Air Air Combat Combat 2. 2. Land Land Combat Combat 3. 3. Sea Sea Combat Combat 4. 4. Electronic Electronic Combat Combat 5. 5. Space Space Combat Combat 6. 6. C4ISR C4ISR 7. 7. Armaments Armaments and and Munitions Munitions 8. 8. Targets Targets and and Threat Threat 9. 9. Test Test Environments Environments 10. 10. Common Common Range Range Instrumentation Instrumentation T&E Strategic Plan Bottom-up Inputs 16

Strategic Planning Interrelation and Roles 17

T&E Investments and the Strategic Planning Process Operational Requirements T&E/S&T Acquisition Program Suite T&E Requirements T&E Areas of Interest Focus Areas Assessments Test Capability Areas Assessments CTEIP Service POM Investment T&E Capabilities Database 18

Strategic Plan Focus Area Selection Process Establish Preliminary FA List Evaluate Program and Technology Investments Assess Programs of Record and Technology Demos Evaluate Operational Needs and High Level Guidance Notification Memo to Services and Agencies Vet Proposed FAs at T&E conferences or symposia (e.g. Annual Infrastructure Review) Finalize FA List for Current Development Cycle 19

Strategic Planning Focus Area Working Groups Focus Area Working Group Composition TRMC Lead Lead POC form each Service/Agency Headquarters Service/Agency Subject Matter Experts for each Technical Area (Action Officer) Multiple Supporting Members Headquarters POCs Serve as Final Authority Action Officers Serves as principal POC between TRMC and their Service/Agency Reviews and vets focus area development throughout their respective Service/Agency Participates in meetings as established by the TRMC Focus Area leads 20

Summary Strategic Plan provides fundamental support to the TRMC mission Foundational document for DoD T&E resources Must be collaboratively developed with the Services and Agencies it influences Influence s T&E S&T, CTEIP, and Service/Agency investments 21

Questions? 22