Headquarters U.S. Air Force

Similar documents
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

U.S. DoD Insensitive Munitions Program. Anthony J. Melita

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

This is definitely another document that needs to have lots of HSI language in it!

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Implementing the Joint Battle Management Command & Control Roadmap Panel

DoDI ,Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Change 1 & 2

Defense Acquisition Guidebook Systems Engineering Chapter Update

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Inside... Special Reference Edition. Winter 2002

JITC Joint Interoperability Test, Evaluation, and Certification Overview

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Joint Interoperability Certification

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

KC-46A Tanker DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017. RDT&E U.S. Air Force

US Department of Defense Systems Engineering Policy and Guidance

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Optimizing Interoperability since 1947

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

State of the Defense Standardization Program. An Overview of the DSP

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) Human Effects Characterization

MOTION IMAGERY STANDARDS PROFILE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Relationship of the DOD Information Technology Standards Registry (DISR) with the Defense Standardization Program

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

An Independent Perspective From a former PM & PEO. NDIA 13th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 26 Oct 10

Product Support Manager Workshop. Rapid Capabilities. Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell

NG-J6/CIO CNGBI A DISTRIBUTION: A 26 September 2016 NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU JOINT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

International Military Rationalization, Standardization, and Interoperability

Technical Data (an Output of Systems Engineering) in the Context of the LCMC

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

MOTION IMAGERY STANDARDS PROFILE

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report. Department of Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization (DHMSM)

Capabilities Overview

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

CJCSI B Requirements Generation System (One Year Later)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate

CONTEXT FOR ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS: WHY DO WE HAVE TO DO VE? WHO HAS AUTHORITY OVER VE? THE CUSTOMER WON T PAY FOR VE!

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)

DOD INSTRUCTION DIRECTOR OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS (SBP)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #163

This instruction has been tiered IAW AFI , Publications and Forms Management.

JCIDS Overview. Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System. Joint Staff, J-8 Capabilities and Acquisition Division UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

17956 Joint Munitions Safety Testing (JMST)

DoD Instruction dated 8 December Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Statutory and Regulatory Changes

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Host Nation Support UNCLASSIFIED. Army Regulation Manpower and Equipment Control

Title:F/A-18 - EA-18 Aircraft / System Program Protection Implementation Plan

DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Joint Service Safety Testing Study Phase II Final Presentation

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC MCO C C2I 15 Jun 89

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Acquisitions and Contracting Basics in the National Industrial Security Program (NISP)

February 2009 Updated 31 July 2009 MANUAL FOR THE OPERATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

(FOUO) Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System Not Ready for Production Decision

The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Warfighting Capabilities Determination

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86

Transcription:

Headquarters U.S. Air Force Processes and Enabling Policy for Compliance with Materiel International Standardization Agreements (ISA) Mr. Chris Ptachik SAF/AQRE Contractor Engineering Policy Branch 23 September 2009 1

Questions and Answers What are Materiel International Standardization Agreements (ISA)? What are the types of materiel ISAs? How are they developed, ratified, implemented, and complied with? What is the applicable policy and enabling language for compliance? 2

What are Materiel ISAs? NATO Standardization Agreement (STANAG) Air & Space Interoperability Council (ASIC) Air Standard (AIR STD) American British Canadian & Australian Armies (ABCA) Quadripartite Standardization Agreement (QSTAG) 3

Types of Materiel ISAs: Operational Capability/Supportability Interfaces for Interoperability Characteristics for Interchangeability STANAG No. TITLE STANAG No. TITLE 3456 3447 7085 AIRCRAFT ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS AERIAL REFUELLING EQUIPMENT - PROBE- DROGUE INTERFACE CHARACTERISTICS INTEROPERABLE DATA LINKS FOR IMAGING SYSTEMS 1135 3747 INTERCHANGEABILITY OF FUELS, LUBRICANTS AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS USED BY THE ARMED FORCES OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY NATIONS GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS (MINIMUM QUALITY STANDARDS) FOR AVIATION TURBINE FUELS (F-34, F-35, F-40 AND F-44) 3585 20 MM AMMUNITION AND LINKS FOR AIRCRAFT GUNS 4

Types of Materiel ISAs: Sys Performance/Acq Management Design Criteria for Systems/Equipment Standard Practices For Program Management STANAG No. TITLE 3705 HUMAN ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA FOR CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS IN AIRCREW STATIONS 7119 GENERIC OPEN ARCHITECTURE FRAMEWORK 4187/ AOP-16 FUZING SYSTEMS: SAFETY DESIGN REQUIREMENTS STANAG No. TITLE 4093 MUTUAL ACCEPTANCE BY NATO MEMBER COUNTRIES OF QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRONIC AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS FOR MILITARY USE 4174 ALLIED RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY PUBLICATIONS 4661 PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE SUPPORT 5

Materiel ISA Processes and Applicable DOD/CJCS Policy International Armaments Coop & Military RSI DODD 2010.6 CJCSI 2700.01 Development Ratification ABCA ASIC ISA AFROC JROC Warfighter ICD CDD Requirements JCIDS CJCSI 3170.01 CJCSM 3170.01 NATO Implementation DSP DOD 4120.24-M ISAs Materiel Industry ICD CID PID Sys Spec TEMP SEP APB Compliance Acquisition System DODD 5000.1 DODI 5000.2 DAG Adopted NGS Def Specs/ Stds ASSIST/ PMT Sys Rqmts Doc. Government Systems Engineering Acquisition 6

Enabling Policy Language: CJCSI 2700.01C (8 Feb 08) INTERNATIONAL MILITARY AGREEMENTS FOR RATIONALIZATION, STANDARDIZATION, AND INTEROPERABILITY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES, ITS ALLIES, AND OTHER FRIENDLY NATIONS 3. Policy. b. The desired degree of international military RSI is necessarily subject to financial, technical, legal, and policy considerations. An international military RSI standardization agreement will be written and negotiated in line with the following standardization principles: (2) Essential where effective implementation of the Capstone Concept for Joint Operations, operational plans, or validated joint capabilities depends on it. (5) If ratified without registering an appropriate reservation, will be fully implemented and complied with. 7

Enabling Policy Language: DODI 2010.06 (29 Jul 09) MATERIEL INTEROPERABILITY AND STANDARDIZATION WITH ALLIES AND COALITION PARTNERS 3. POLICY. It is DOD policy that: b. Equipment procured for U.S. forces employed in North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), other allied, and coalition operations be standardized or at least interoperable with the equipment of allies and coalition partners. c. Materiel interoperability with allies and coalition partners shall adhere to the Defense Standardization Program (DODI 4120.24 (Reference (f)) and DOD 4120.24-M (Reference (g)). d. The Department of Defense shall comply, to the maximum extent feasible, with applicable materiel international standardization agreements ratified by the United States, subject to systems engineering tradeoffs under Reference (e). 8

Enabling Policy Language: DODI 2010.06, Cont d RESPONSIBILITIES 1. UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY, AND LOGISTICS (USD(AT&L)). The USD(AT&L) shall: g. Ensure that Military Departments and Defense Agencies consider material interoperability and standardization throughout all phases of the Defense Acquisition Management System (Reference (e)), and that U.S.- ratified international standardization agreements (ISAs) are implemented to the maximum extent practical (Reference (h)). 5. SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS AND DIRECTORS OF THE DEFENSE AGENCIES. shall: a. Advise the USD(AT&L) on U.S. interoperability with allies and coalition partners and ensure that materiel interoperability and standardization are considered in the basic conceptual approach in the development, production, and product improvement of all systems and equipment intended for use in coalition operations and that all applicable U.S. ratified materiel international standardization agreements are complied with to the greatest extent feasible. 9

Enabling Policy Language: DOD 4120.24-M (Mar 09 Draft) DEFENSE STANDARDIZATION PROGRAM (DSP) POLICIES AND PROCEDURES C3. STANDARDIZATION IN THE ACQUISITION PROCESS C3.2. MANDATORY STANDARDIZATION CONSIDERATIONS C3.2.4. Compliance with US-ratified ISAs. To achieve interoperability with NATO and coalition forces as required by Section 2457 of reference (h), program offices and procuring activities shall, to the maximum extent feasible when needed to meet required capabilities, comply with US-ratified materiel ISAs applicable to their acquisitions by citing their implementing documents in solicitations and contracts. 10

Enabling Policy Language: CJCSM 3170.01 (31 Jul 09) MANUAL FOR THE OPERATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT 3. CDD Development and Documentation c. The CDD sponsor, in coordination and collaboration with the appropriate DOD components will prepare the CDD. The CDD will include a description of links to the DOD Enterprise Architecture and solution architectures; US-ratified materiel international standardization agreements (reference ll); required capabilities; CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT FORMAT 15. Other System Attributes. a. Describe the non-it/nss capabilities required for allied and coalition operations, identify the potentially applicable US-ratified international standardization agreements, and provide an initial indication of which ones will be incorporated in the system requirements (references z and ll). 11

Enabling Policy Language: DODI 5000.02 (8 Dec 08) OPERATION OF THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM PROCEDURES 6. ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT (EMD) PHASE. c. Phase Description (2) Prior to beginning EMD, users shall identify and the requirements authority shall approve a minimum set of key performance parameters (KPPs), included in the CDD, that shall guide the efforts of this phase. To maximize program trade space and focus test and evaluation, the MDA, PEO, and PM shall work closely with the requirements authority to minimize KPPs and limit total identified program requirements. Performance requirements that do not support the achievement of KPP thresholds shall be limited and considered a part of the engineering trade space during development. 12

Enabling Policy Language: DODI 5000.02, Cont d ENCLOSURE 10, PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 5. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT a. PMs shall pursue opportunities throughout the acquisition life cycle that enhance international cooperation and improve interoperability (DOD Directive 2010.6 (Reference (bs))). b. An international cooperative program is any acquisition program or technology project that includes participation by one or more foreign nations, through an international agreement, during any phase of a system s life cycle. All AT&L-related international agreements may use the streamlined procedures in Reference (f) for review and approval rather than the procedures in DOD Directive 5530.3 (Reference (bt)). All international cooperative programs shall consider applicable U.S.-ratified materiel international standardization agreements (Reference (h)), and fully comply with foreign disclosure and program protection requirements.... 13

Summary: Materiel ISA Compliance Link ISA development to correct process/policy Interoperability/supportability JCIDS Design Criteria/Standard Practice International Armaments Cooperation Ratification needs effective DSP implementation and ASSIST support Compliance prerequisites JCIDS requirement for interoperability/supportability Acquisition identification of applicable ratified ISAs Viable DSP implementing documents Supporting DOD acquisition policy 14

QUESTIONS 15