Kill Vehicle Work Breakdown Structure

Similar documents
STATEMENT J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference

2018 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference

Doc 01. MDA Discrimination JSR August 3, JASON The MITRE Corporation 7515 Colshire Drive McLean, VA (703)

THAAD Overview. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. THAAD Program Overview_1

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

THAAD Program Summary

Advanced Technology Overview for the Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association

Arms Control Today. U.S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance

THEATER HIGH ALTITUDE AREA DEFENSE (THAAD)

THEATER HIGH ALTITUDE AREA DEFENSE (THAAD)

Ballistic Missile Defense Update

Department of Defense Report to the Congress NAVY THEATER WIDE DEFENSE SYSTEM (FORMERLY NAVY UPPER TIER)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE C: SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM FY 2012 OCO

Kinetic Energy Kill for Ballistic Missile Defense: A Status Overview

Missile Defense Program Overview For The European Union, Committee On Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee On Security And Defence

Ballistic Missile Defense Overview

Phased Adaptive Approach Overview For The Atlantic Council

GAO MISSILE DEFENSE. Opportunity Exists to Strengthen Acquisitions by Reducing Concurrency. Report to Congressional Committees

100th Missile Defense Brigade (GMD)

Introduction to missiles

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Ballistic Missile Defense Update

2008 Assessment of the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

mm*. «Stag GAO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Information on Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and Other Theater Missile Defense Systems 1150%

Hit to kill: the US strategic missile defence system moves on from ICBM target intercept

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Trusted Partner in guided weapons

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Information Technology Management

Ballistic Missile Defense Update

Missile Defense Agency Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) /

Keywords. Guided missiles, Classification of guided missiles, Subsystems of guided missiles

Indefensible Missile Defense

Issue 16-04B (No. 707) March 22, THAAD 2. CHINA S CORE KOREA POLICY 3. UN SANCTIONS WHICH ONE NEXT? 5.

Ballistic Missile Defense Overview

Approved for Public Release Public Release 18-MAR-9507 President s Budget Overview HQ-G

Union of Concerned Scientists Working Paper

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association Monthly Luncheon

ALTERNATE BOOST VEHICLE (ABV) VERIFICATION TESTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

Joint Electronics Type Designation Automated System

Science, Technology, and Attack Tactics Relevant to National Missile Defense Systems

Phase I Submission Name of Program: TARGETS & COUNTERMEASURES PROGRAM

Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

SSC Pacific is making its mark as

UNCLASSIFIED. May RDT&E, DW/04 Advanced Component Development and Prototypes (ACD&P) Date

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Edited extract from: Department of the Army Historical Summary, FY 1979 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Center of Military History, 1982, pp

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE

UNCLASSIFIED. Date Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Exhibit R-2 RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

MEADS MEDIUM EXTENDED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM

This Minuteman III missile launch illustrates two of the reasons why boost-phase interception is often more advantageous than attempting interception

Good afternoon, Chairman Fischer, Ranking Member Donnelly, distinguished Members

UNCLASSIFIED. Date Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Exhibit R-2 RDT&E Budget Item Justification

NAVY AREA THEATER BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (NATBMD)

CHAPTER VII JOINT THEATER MISSILE DEFENSE

Joint Theater Missile Defense

Vice Admiral James D. Syring. Director, Missile Defense Agency. House Armed Services Committee. Subcommittee on Strategic Forces

First Announcement/Call For Papers

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A

Vice Admiral J.D. Syring, USN. Director, Missile Defense Agency. Before the. House Armed Service Committee. Subcommittee on Strategic Forces

NATIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE (NMD)

missiles as low. The greater concern, however, stems from the emergence of a Third World long range missile threat to the United States.

BUDGET UNCERTAINTY AND MISSILE DEFENSE

NAVY AREA THEATER BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (NATBMD)

BMDO RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

AEGIS BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Russian defense industrial complex s possibilities for development of advanced BMD weapon systems

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

AEGIS BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE

Number: DI-MGMT Approval Date:

Airborne Patrol to Destroy DPRK ICBMs in Powered Flight

Number: DI-MGMT Approval Date:

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Approved for Public Release 11-MDA-6310 (10 August 11)

SMDC/ARSTRAT Role In Support Of Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense

Vice Admiral James D. Syring. Director, Missile Defense Agency. Senate Appropriations Committee. Defense Subcommittee. Wednesday, July 17, 2013

BMDO RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Welcome to the MDA Public Meeting

Leveraging Small Modular/Molten Salt Reactors for

The Patriot Missile Failure

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Vice Admiral J.D. Syring, USN. Director, Missile Defense Agency. Senate Armed Services Committee. Subcommittee on Strategic Forces

Missile Defense Program Update

Development and Fielding of the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Unitary Warhead

Number: DI-MGMT Approval Date:

Lockheed Martin Corporation Integrating Air & Missile Defense

Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Today, the Obama administration

Challenges in Vertical Collaboration Among Warfighters for Missile Defense C2

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45

Transcription:

Kill Vehicle Work Breakdown Structure Approved for Public Release 14-MDA-7774 (9 April 14) Jennifer Tarin, Ph.D. Paul Tetrault Christian Smart, Ph.D. MDA/DO 1

Agenda Purpose Background Overview and Comparison of MDA Kill Vehicles Developing Alternate Kill Vehicle WBSs Description of Alternate Kill Vehicle WBSs Path Forward Proposed Hybrid KV WBS Summary 2

Purpose Integrate MDA cost data with the overall DoD Defense Automated Cost Information Management System (DACIMS) database maintained by the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) Defense Cost and Resource Center (DCARC) Propose and seek approval for Kill Vehicle (KV) Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) consistent with Military Standard 881C (MIL-STD-881C) 3

Background MDA Director for Operations instructed MDA/DOC Director to extend support to DCARC to ensure inclusion of MDA cost data in the DoD DACIMS database Support requires MDA/DOC to work with DCARC on Contractor Cost Data Reporting heavily dependent on a standard WBS MDA/DOC identified kill vehicles as a primary product MIL-STD- 881C does not address MIL-STD-881C contains Missile Systems Appendix C which defines the payload element - Payload often contains explosive warheads and includes a limited WBS 1.1.8.1 Payload Integration Assembly Test and Checkout 1.1.8.2 Target Defeat Mechanism 1.1.8.3 Target Detection Device 1.1.8.4 Fuse 1.1.8.5 Payload Software Release 1 N 1.1.8.6 Other payload Subsystem 1 N (Specific) 4

Kill Vehicles - Overview Kill Vehicle is a guided weapon that utilizes hit-to-kill technology after separation from a boosting vehicle - Engage and destroy a ballistic missile threat and/or a threat re-entry vehicle - Hitting a bullet with a bullet - MDA kill vehicles use kinetic energy to destroy incoming threats - Operate autonomously as a short lived space vehicle MDA is developing and fielding ballistic missiles that are multi-stage solid fuel boosters with kill vehicle payloads, these include: - Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV) - Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (ABMD) Kinetic Warhead (KW) - Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Kill Vehicle (KV) New WBS needs to support existing and new Kill Vehicle technologies that may include common KV component developments 5

GMD EKV Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) - Defensive weapon fielded by MDA - Engage and destroy limited intermediate- and long-range ballistic missile threats in space Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV) - Consists of seeker, Divert and Attitude Control System (DACS), communications link, guidance and control system, and computers to support target selection and interception - Uses guidance data transmitted from the ground support and fire control system components along with on-board sensors to close with and destroy the target warhead - Engages threat outside earth s atmosphere 6

ABMD KW Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) - Defensive weapon fielded by the U.S. Navy - Engage and destroy short- to intermediate-range, unitary and separating, midcourse-phase ballistic missile threats Kinetic Warhead (KW) - Consists of a seeker, DACS, communications link, guidance and control system, and computers to support target selection and interception - Uses guidance data transmitted from the Navy s Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System components along with on-board sensors to close with and destroy the target warhead - Engages threat outside earth s atmosphere 7

THAAD KV Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) - Defensive weapon fielded by the U.S. Army - Engage and destroy ballistic missiles inside or outside the atmosphere during the final, or terminal, phase of flight Kill Vehicle (KV) - Consists of a fore-cone, seeker, DACS, communications link, guidance and control system, and computers to support target selection and interception - Uses guidance data transmitted from Army Navy/Transportable Radar Surveillance components along with on-board sensors to close with and destroy the target warhead - Engages threat inside or outside the Earth s atmosphere 8

Comparison of MDA Kill Vehicles Aligns nomenclature differences between EKV, KW, and KV Identifies high level elements that have the same function Determines which elements to include or omit from initial KV WBS and define in the dictionary Results in a comprehensive WBS that efficiently identifies elements which can represent any current or future proposed MDA kill vehicles 9

Developing KV WBS Alternatives MDA began by blending program KV WBSs requirements to form an initial Agency KV WBS - Established an initial set of MDA kill vehicle required elements - Added projected new requirements including Multiple KV or common component developments MDA considered several alternatives in creating the a proposed MIL-STD-881C KV WBS - Simplified Space Systems WBS - Missile within Missile Systems WBS - Hybrid Missile and Space Systems WBS 10

Alternative I Derives from MIL-STD-881C Appendix F Space Systems Models kill vehicle from space vehicle and boosting system from launch vehicle; simplified Space Systems WBS Advantage: evolves from space vehicle WBS which defines essential kill vehicle sub-elements - Predefined by MIL-STD-881C Appendix F - Presents a clear trace to the existing MIL-STD-881C Drawbacks - Space Systems WBS includes many extraneous elements - Subsystems required to support the space vehicle in exo-atmospheric conditions for long periods include sub-elements unnecessary to kill vehicle - Nomenclature differences that are atypical in the kill vehicle community This approach involved modifications that were cumbersome and a complete WBS was NOT developed 11

Alternative II Derives from MIL-STD-881C Appendix C Missile Systems Model both kill vehicle and boosting system with the air vehicle WBS; missile within a missile version of the Missile Systems WBS Advantages: evolves from the air vehicle WBS which defines essential kill vehicle elements - Predefined by MIL-STD-881C Appendix C - Presents a clear trace to the existing MIL-STD-881C Drawbacks - Missile Systems WBS includes many extraneous elements - Air vehicle WBS contains unnecessary sub-elements and lacks essential sub-elements to kill vehicles - Payload WBS needs to include many sub-elements for the kill vehicle to map to the air vehicle - Results in multiple reserve elements 12

Alternative III Proposed Hybrid KV WBS Derives from MIL-STD-881C Appendix F Space Systems and Appendix C Missile Systems Models both kill vehicle and booster from air vehicle in Appendix C; combines space vehicle elements from Appendix F to form a hybrid KV WBS with corresponding dictionary Advantages - Develops a unique standalone solution to KV WBS - Leverages the best qualities of Alternatives I and II - Evolves from air vehicle and space vehicle WBS defining essential kill vehicle elements and sub-elements Traces to MIL-STD-881C and kill vehicle is predefined by Appendix C Traces kill vehicle sub-elements to space vehicle sub-elements in Appendix F Drawbacks - Combination of air vehicle and space vehicle elements will not trace easily to existing MIL-STD-881C - Some disadvantages of Alternatives I and II remain - Requires a combination of new, modified, reused elements and definitions to form hybrid KV WBS - Alignment of sub-elements becomes unique to the proposed KV WBS 13

Alternative III Justification Alternative III advantages outweigh the drawbacks Foundation of the proposed Hybrid KV WBS traces largely to existing MIL-STD-881C appendices - Missile Systems WBS functions as backbone - Space vehicle WBS provides details Proposed KV WBS will be a substitute for payload of Appendix C Missile System WBS - Begin numbering KV WBS with Appendix C WBS 1.1.8 Payload - Substitute KV WBS for payload as alternate Proposed KV WBS is representative of MDA current and proposed future kill vehicles 14

Proposed Hybrid KV WBS C.3 WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE LEVELS C.3 WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE LEVELS WBS# 1 2 3 4 5 6 WBS# 1 2 3 4 5 6 1.1.8 Kill Vehicle 1.1.8.5 Navigation 1.1.8.1 Kill Vehicle Structure and Harnesses 1.1.8.5.1 Navigation Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.1.8.2 Divert and Attitude Control System (DACS) 1.1.8.5.2 Sensor Assemblies 1.1.8.2.1 DACS Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.1.8.5.3 Navigation Software Release 1 n 1.1.8.2.2 Divert Subsystem 1.1.8.6 Communications 1.1.8.2.3 Attitude Control System 1.1.8.6.1 Communications Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.1.8.2.4 Gas Generator/Structure 1.1.8.6.2 Communications Subsystem 1.1.8.2.5 Controller Electronics 1.1.8.6.3 Antenna Assembly 1.1.8.2.6 Ordnance Initiation Set 1.1.8.6.4 Communications Software Release 1 n 1.1.8.2.7 Flight Termination System 1.1.8.7 Reserved 1.1.8.2.8 DACS Software Release 1 n 1.1.8.8 Kill Vehicle Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.1.8.3 Power and Distribution 1.1.8.9 Systems Engineering 1.1.8.3.1 Power and Distribution Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.1.8.10 Program Management 1.1.8.3.2 Primary Power 1.1.8.11 System Test and Evaluation 1.1.8.3.3 Power Conditioning Electronics 1.1.8.12 Peculiar Support Equipment 1.1.8.3.4 Distribution Harness 1.1.8.13 Common Support Equipment 1.1.8.3.5 Power and Distribution Software Release 1 n 1.1.8.4 Guidance and Control Processing 1.1.8.4.1 Guidance and Control Processing Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.1.8.4.2 Seeker Assembly 1.1.8.4.3.1 Seeker Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.1.8.4.3.2 Optical Telescope Assembly 1.1.8.4.3.3 Focal Plane Array 1.1.8.4.3.4 Cooling Assembly 1.1.8.4.3.5 Electronics 1.1.8.4.3.6 Gimbal Assembly 1.1.8.4.3.7 Seeker Software Release 1 n 1.1.8.4.3 Guidance Computer 1.1.8.4.4 Guidance and Control Processing Software Release 1 n 15

Path Forward Distribute to MDA/DOC program Cost Leads for review Present preliminary MIL-STD-881C WBS concept to OSD CAPE Incorporate CAPE feedback Route to MDA programs for concurrence / suggestions Distribute to MDA Prime KV Contractors for concurrence / suggestions Present to MDA/DO C/CFO Route Proposed Final to OSD CAPE Submit to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Performance Assessments and Root Cause Analysis (OASD(A))/PARCA for approval and inclusion in MIL-STD-881C 16

17