Joint Battle Management Language (JBML) Project (Phase 1) Dr. Stan Levine. Outline. JBML Phase 1 Description/Status

Similar documents
Evaluating the Proposed Coalition Battle Management Language Standard as a Basis for Enhanced C2 to M&S Interoperability

Extensible Battle Management Language

Integrating National C2 and Simulation Systems for BML Experimentation

Adding Reports to Coalition Battle Management Language for NATO MSG-048

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

NATO MSG-048 Coalition Battle Management Initial Demonstration Lessons Learned and Way Forward

Battle Management Language Transformations

C2SIM Systems and in Use/Coalitions Assembled

Collaboration, Interoperability, and Secure Systems

US Army CIO/G6 Battle Management Language (BML) Architecture Project ISSUE

15th ICCRTS. The Evolution of C2. C2 framework for interoperability among an air component command and multi-agency systems

NATO MSG-085 Standardisation for C2-Simulation Interoperation: Autonomous Air Operations Experiments

C2SIM Systems and in Use/Coalitions Assembled

20th ICCRTS. C2, Cyber and Trust

Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Integrating National C2 and Simulation Systems for BML Experimentation

An Expanded C2-Simulation Experimental Environment Based on BML

21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace. Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability

Geospatial Battle Management Language (geobml)

CURRICULUM OUTLINE OF INSTRUCTION SURFACE WARFARE OFFICER DEPARTMENT HEAD COURSE CIN: A-4H-0107 CDP: 9545 VER: 2.0 CHANGE: 3

The Verification for Mission Planning System

C2- Simula*on Interoperability for Opera*onal Hybrid Environments

Air Force WALEX Applications

Joint Warfare System (JWARS)

John Kearley Alion Science & Technology

Siemens Business Services E-Government Strategy. How to build it for a whole country the Austrian E-Government Experience

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

Capability Integration

Research Proposal Major William Torn Tompkins ISR RTF Vigilant Horizons. Working Title

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Challenges in Vertical Collaboration Among Warfighters for Missile Defense C2

The 9th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium

Possible technology domains and project categories of EDIDP Industrial Forum

The Joint Force Air Component Commander and the Integration of Offensive Cyberspace Effects

Using the Multinational Experiment 4 (MNE4) Modeling and Simulation Federation to Support Joint Experimentation

An Investigation of ISR Coordination and Information Presentation Strategies to Support Expeditionary Strike Groups

Sea Viper Maritime Missile Defence

Transit Routing. Transit Routing in the ACI Fabric. This chapter contains the following sections: Transit Routing Use Cases, page 3

Capabilities Presentation

Implementing a COI Service Joint COI Data Implementation

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

The Air Force View of IAMD in a Joint Environment

An Approach to Achieving Digital Interoperability for the DoD: A discussion of the Joint Staff J6 Coordinated Implementation Methodology

DEEP STRIKE: The Evolving Face of War. By ALBERT R. HOCHEVAR, JAMES A. ROBARDS, JOHN M. SCHAFER, and JAMES M. ZEPKA

Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense. JWARN Description

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Modeling and Simulation Integration with Network-Centric Command and Control Architectures

Implementation and Integration of TDL's in Maritime Platforms (AWD). CAPT James Nash SEA 4000 FMS Director

Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED The Joint Staff Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #107

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

JC3IEDM - Annex J - IPT3 V3.1.4 ANNEX J. REFERENCES. NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions, AAP-6(2008), NATO Military

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Tactical Edge Command and Control On-The-Move A New Paradigm

The Concept of C2 Communication and Information Support

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

RFID-based Hospital Real-time Patient Management System. Abstract. In a health care context, the use RFID (Radio Frequency

Project Overview for the Technical Compliance Monitoring System

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #181

Joint Distributed Engineering Plant (JDEP)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

DDG 1000 Class Destroyer

Mr. Steve Reeder SCRA 5300 International Boulevard, N. Charleston, SC (P) , (F)

Maritime Planning Support System (MPSS) for Fleet Battle Experiment Juliet (FBE-J)

September 03, 1985 Military Exercise Druzhba-85 Plan to conduct a one-sided, multi-stage combined-arms army exercise codenamed "Druzhba-85"

Joint Command and Control (JC2) Capability & C2 Data Model

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)

R-2 Exhibit RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE FEBRUARY 1999 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E,DW/BA7

03F-SIW-100. A Standard Simulation Framework to Support Operational Evaluation of Ship Self Defense

Collaborative coordination of fire support mission execution

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element S750: Mission Training and Preparation Systems FY 2015

HL7 A Quick Introduction

FM AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY BRIGADE OPERATIONS

Lessons Learned from the MSG- 128 Study on Incremental Implementation of NATO Mission Training through Distributed Simulation Operations

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004

Cyberspace Operations

isupport Project Name: isupport Date: 22 February 2016 Release: 1.5 Revision History Date Version Author Reviewed by Remarks

Project Name: isupport Date: 22 March 2016 Release: 1.5. Revision History Date Version Author Reviewed by Remarks

Aerial Targets & Unmanned Aviation

PART THREE. Operational-Level Support. Chapter 8 Signal Support BATTLEFIELD INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE

MSG-140 Urban Combat Advanced Training Technology (UCATT) Live Simulation Standards

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Air-Sea Battle: Concept and Implementation

Making the World Safer: reducing the threat of weapons of mass destruction

New Text Docurnent.txt. Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Good practices on Single Window Regional Integration Experience of ASEAN countries

VOLUME 5, NUMBER 3, 2011

UNCLASSIFIED. COST (in millions) FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Joint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

JFACC NEXT STEP. The services accept and joint doctrine. Taking the MARCUS HURLEY

Transcription:

Joint Battle Management Language (J) Project (Phase 1) Dr. Stan Levine May 18, 2007 Slide 1 Outline Purpose J Phase 1 Description/Status Demonstration Results J Future Plans/Summary/Conclusions Slide 2 1

Purpose The purpose of this briefing is to present the results of Phase 1 of the Joint Battle Management Language Program (J) Slide 3 Outline Purpose J Phase 1 Description/Status Demonstration Results J Future Plans/Summary/Conclusions Slide 4 2

Phase 1 Project Definition Lead a collaborative effort to continue core capability development Synchronize Service, Joint and Coalition activities to produce a Joint Specification Establish Joint Services and Coalition consensus on C2-Sim interoperability based on a standard C2 interchange Data Model (JC3IEDM) JFCOM JNTC: technical, funding, and transition partner Slide 5 Phase 1 Goal Build and demonstrate an initial Joint capability to transmit digital orders: to Joint and Combined Forces using a Battle Management Language specification for Proof of Principle Slide 6 3

J Phase 1 Products Proof of Principle for Joint Capability Representative Land, Sea, Air Draft SISO standard Including Web Service infrastructure Integrated into NATO MSG-048 planning Slide 7 J Phase 1 Team Leads Mr. Michael Powers, TEC, Program Manager Dr. Mark Pullen, GMU, Project Lead Dr. Michael Hieb, GMU, Technical Lead Dr. Stan Levine, GMU, Project Manager Dr. Andreas Tolk, ODU, Standards Lead Dr. Harry Keeling, HU, Testbed Lead Mr. John Roberts, ACS, Ground Lead Mr. Curtis Blais, NPS, Maritime Lead Mr. David Perme, Gestalt, Air Lead Ms. Shea Smith, JATTL, JFCOM Coordinator Mr. John Kearley, DRC, Scenario Lead Slide 8 4

J Service Architecture 1 WSDL Domain Knowledge 3 XSD FILES Web Service Exchange Interface 2 XML/WSDL Domain-Configured Service fully defines domain language Slide 9 J Service Architecture 1 WSDL Domain Knowledge 3 XSD FILES Web Service Exchange Interface 2 XML/WSDL Domain-Configured Service 4 API fully defines domain language Base Service Who, What, Where, When, Why Slide 10 5

J Service Architecture 1 WSDL Domain Knowledge 3 XSD FILES fully defines domain language 2 Web Service Exchange Interface XML/WSDL Domain-Configured Service 4 API Base Service Who, What, Where, When, Why 6 API Reference Implementation middleware common to all domains Common Data Access Software 7 SQL = Defined Interfaces all layers include validation JC3IEDM Domain Specific Extensions JC3IEDM Database Slide 11 J Service Architecture 1 WSDL Domain Knowledge 3 XSD FILES fully defines domain language 2 Web Service Exchange Interface XML/WSDL XML/WSDL Domain-Configured Service 4 API Base Service Who, What, Where, When, Why 8 XML/WSDL 5 Reference Implementation middleware common to all domains 6 API Common Data Access Software 7 SQL = Defined Interfaces all layers include validation JC3IEDM Domain Specific Extensions JC3IEDM Database Non-JC3IEDM Databases/Sources NOTE: Interface 5 (push) and Interface 8 (push & pull) are provided for future use (they are not used in J Phase 1) Slide 12 6

XSD Joint CommandType <xsd:complextype name="commandtype"> <xsd:choice> <xsd:element name="groundcommand" type="groundcommandtype" minoccurs="0" maxoccurs="unbounded"/> <xsd:element name="aircommand" type="aircommandtype" minoccurs="0" maxoccurs="unbounded"/> <xsd:element name="maritimecommand" type="maritimecommandtype" minoccurs="0" maxoccurs="unbounded"/> </xsd:choice> </xsd:complextype> Slide 13 XSD GroundCommandType <xsd:complextype name="groundcommandtype"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="taskeewho" type="whotype"/> <xsd:element name="what" type="groundwhattype"/> <xsd:element name="where" type="wheretype"/> <xsd:element name="startwhen type="whentype"/> <xsd:element name="endwhen" type="whentype" minoccurs="0"/> <xsd:element name="affectedwho type="whotype" minoccurs="0"/> <xsd:element name="why" type="groundwhytype" minoccurs="0"/> <xsd:element name="label" type="labeltype"/> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complextype> Slide 14 7

Outline Purpose J Phase 1 Description/Status Demonstration Results J Future Plans/Summary/Conclusions Slide 15 J Demo Environment C2 Interfaces C2 Specific Interface NATIVE USMTF plus JTC GCCS/ TBMCS Maritime Air C2 Specific Interface XML C2PC/ CAPES Ground Slide 16 8

J Demo Environment Web Service JC3IEDM PUSH IN C2 Interfaces C2 Specific Interface NATIVE USMTF plus JTC GCCS/ TBMCS Maritime Air C2 Specific Interface XML C2PC/ CAPES Ground Slide 17 J Demo Environment Web Service PULL OUT JC3IEDM PUSH IN C2 Interfaces C2 Specific Interface NATIVE USMTF plus JTC GCCS/ TBMCS Maritime Air C2 Specific Interface XML C2PC/ CAPES Ground Slide 18 9

J Demo Environment Web Service PULL OUT Sim Interfaces USAF/USN AIR Gateway USA/USN Gnd/Missile Gateway JSAF orders JSAF V 3.1 Bridged JSAF 2004 SP1 JC3IEDM PUSH IN C2 Interfaces C2 Specific Interface NATIVE USMTF plus JTC GCCS/ TBMCS Maritime Air C2 Specific Interface XML C2PC/ CAPES Ground Slide 19 Demo Concept of the Operation Army units proceed through Urban Areas, seizing designated objectives and destroying enemy forces, in order to reestablish an international border. They are preceded by: Navy and Air Force strikes on key C2 and communication nodes Close Air Support strikes Pre-planned Navy Tomahawk strikes Slide 20 10

J Demonstration Joint Combat Operations CJTF-CS Joint orders to component commanders JFLCC as supported commander directs: 2nd ID to conduct major ground operations: 1-66 CAB to re-take strategic towns, airfields, railheads, and restore border JFACC will conduct offensive operations: Deep strike Close air support JFMCC will conduct offensive operations: Provide forces (air and cruise missile) to JFACC for deep strike, close air support Slide 21 Gulf of Caspia Joint Operations 41N Joint Urban Operations Target Area Slide 22 11

Gulf of Caspia Joint Operations Tanrykulular Airfield Baku-Bina Airfield 41N Joint Urban Operations Target Area Slide 23 Gulf of Caspia Joint Operations Reagan CVSG Tomahawk Russell Hamilton Antietam Santa Fe 41N Joint Urban Operations Target Area Lincoln CVSG Tomahawk Mobile Bay Shoup Momsen Chicago Slide 24 12

Gulf of Caspia Joint Operations 41N Ground Forces Joint Urban Operations Target Area Slide 25 Gulf of Caspia Joint Operations Tanrykulular Airfield Baku-Bina Airfield Reagan CVSG Tomahawk Russell Hamilton Antietam Santa Fe 41N Ground Forces Joint Urban Operations Target Area Lincoln CVSG Tomahawk Mobile Bay Shoup Momsen Chicago Slide 26 13

Summary Phase 1 has been successful in developing a basic Joint integrated capability: ATO, Ground OPORD, TLAM INDIGO TBMCS, JTC, C2PC, multiple JSAF Risks/Issues have been addressed and resolved Basis for Coalition Standard Slide 27 Outline Purpose J Phase 1 Description/Status Demonstration Results J Future Plans/Summary/Conclusions Slide 28 14

J Web Service Architecture Available at http://netlab.gmu.edu/j (under password control) Descriptive documents Architecture overview Domain Configured Service (DCS); Base Service (BBS); Common Data Access Service (CDAS) Code documentation (narrative & Javadoc) XSD Web service schema SQL database schema Open source code Latest version of all Web services Ground, Air, and Maritime domains for DCS CDAS and BBS made possible by open source bootstrap of VMASC Atomic and Composite services GUI to inspect JC3IEDM database using CDAS Slide 29 J Follow-on Phase 2 Phase 2 Basic Capability for Joint Operations Adequate Land/Littoral/Sea/Air for exercises Initial PMESII support Two-way flow between C2 and Simulation Evolving standards process First balloted C- standard Proof of Principle for NATO Slide 30 15

Phase 3 J Follow-on Phase 3 Joint capability usable as infrastructure in systems Full support for significant exercise and experimentation events Both US and NATO Formal SISO standards effort for family of interoperating s Slide 31 Conclusions is a viable technology needs more development Analysis of ROI is a critical next step Identifying target systems and simulations is critical to success Resourcing needs to be stabalized Slide 32 16

Questions? Slide 33 17