METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari Ed Dodd - City of Sebastian Linda Kinchen- City of Sebastian, Alternate Laura Moss -City of Vero Beach Shawn Frost-MPO Vice-Chairman, IRC School Board Dale Simchick -IRC School Board, Alternate Lange Sykes -City of Vero Beach Anthony Young -City of Vero Beach, Alternate Dick Haverland-Town of Indian River Shores Bob Auwaerter-Town of IRS, Alternate Sara Savage -City of Fellsmere Joel Tyson-City of Fellsmere, Alternate Non-voting Ex-Officio Member Harold Ofstie-Town of Orchid FDOT District 4 Representative Bob McPartlan MPO Chairman AGENDA The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) will meet at 10:00 AM on Wednesday, February 14, 2018, in Conference Room B1-501, County Administration Building B, 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Election of Officers 4. Approval of Minutes December 13, 2017 Action Required 5. Status Report of MPO Advisory Committees No Action Required 6. Appointments to the Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board Action Required 7. Consideration of the Public Participation Plan (PPP) Update Action Required F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MPO\2018\2-14-18\Agenda.doc 1

8. Adoption of MPO Performance Measure Safety Targets Action Required 9. 2018 Transit Development Plan (TDP) Major Update Presentation No Action Required 10. Consideration of Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Amendments No Action Required 11. Other Business Presentation by Vero Beach Regional Airport Director Eric Menger SR 60 Pedestrian Safety FL Turnpike Project Update 12. Comments from the Public 13. Adjournment Next Meeting: MPO April 11, 2018; 10:00 AM; Conference Room B1-501. To view the MPO Agenda packet on-line please go to the following link: http://www.ircgov.com/boards/mpo/2018/agendas/mpo21418a.pdf If you have any questions concerning the items on this agenda, please contact MPO staff at (772) 226-1455. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which includes the testimony and evidence on which the appeal is based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting must contact the County s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 772 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. For complaints, questions or concerns about civil rights or nondiscrimination; or for special requests under the American with Disabilities Act, please contact: Phil Matson, Title VI Coordinator at (772) 226-1455 or pmatson@ircgov.com. Except for those matters specifically exempted under State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Committee shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Committee of any action on the agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which the Committee is to take action which was either not on the agenda or distributed to the public prior to the commencement of the meeting. Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. Persons who require special accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act or persons who require translation services (free of charge) should contact Phil Matson at (772) 226-1455 or pmatson@ircgov.com at least seven days prior to the meeting. F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MPO\2018\2-14-18\Agenda.doc 2

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION A meeting of the Indian River County (IRC) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) was held at 10:00 AM on Wednesday, December 13, 2017, in the County Administration Building B, Room B1-501, 1800 27 th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. Note: Audio and video recordings of the meeting can be found at http://www.ircgov.com/boards/mpo/2017.htm MPO members present were: IRC Commissioners: Commissioner Susan Adams, District 1; Commissioner Joseph Flescher, District 2; Commissioner Tim Zorc, District 3; Commissioner Peter O Bryan, District 4; Chairman Bob McPartlan, Council Member, City of Sebastian; Laura Moss, Council Member, City of Vero Beach; Shawn Frost, IRC School Board; Ed Dodd, Council Member, City of Sebastian; Sara Savage, Vice-Mayor, City of Fellsmere; Dick Haverland, Council Member, Town of Indian River Shores; Cherry Stowe (alternate), Town of Orchid (non-voting member); Mira Skoroden, FDOT (non-voting advisor). Absent was: Commissioner Bob Solari, District 5; Lange Sykes, Council Member, City of Vero Beach; Hal Ofstie, Town of Orchid (non-voting member). IRC staff present were: Jason Brown, IRC Administrator; Rich Szpyrka, IRC Public Works Director; Stan Boling, IRC Community Development Director; Phil Matson, IRC MPO Director; Brian Freeman, MPO Senior Planner; and Sharon Schalm, MPO Staff Assistant 3 /Recording Secretary. Also present were: Bob Auwaerter, Council Member Indian River Shores, Karen Deigl, Chris Stephenson, Senior Resource Association (SRA); Victoria WIlliams, FDOT Turnpike MPO Liaison; Min-Tang Li, FDOT; Gus Schmidt, Eric Penfield, RS&H Consulting; Jeff Luther, Caldwell Bankers; Larry Reisman, Colleen Wixon, TCPalm; David Cox, IRSWCD; Bob Ulevich, Corrigan Ranch; Tom Maher, Chris Avery, Anthony Mancari, Grazina Connell, Kathleen Ryan, Ed Uttridge, Richard Gripenberg, Jean Taber, Old Orchid Homeowners Association, Inc.; Ruth Stanbridge, Mark Holt, Laurie Reed Cassidy, Indian River County Historical Society; Margaret Lechowicz, Matt Lechowicz, Charles Ryan, Mark Loyacano, and Nancy Auwaerter, Concerned Citizens. Call to Order Chairman McPartlan called the meeting to order at 10:00 AM. Approval of Minutes of the MPO Meeting of October 13, 2017 Action Required Chairman McPartlan asked if there were any additions or corrections to the MPO F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MEETING RECORDS\MINUTES\MPO Minutes\2017\MPO 12-13-17 Unapproved.doc 1

minutes of October 13, 2017. ON MOTION BY Commissioner Flescher SECONDED by Mr. Frost, the members voted (11 0) to approve the minutes of the Metropolitan Planning Organization of October 11, 2017, as presented. Presentation of Transportation System of the Year Award No Action Required Mr. Phil Matson, IRC MPO Director noted that the Senior Resource Association, Inc. had won the Transportation System of the Year Award given by the State of Florida. Mr. Matson commended Ms. Deigl, CEO of the Senior Resource Association, and Chris Stephenson of the SRA for their excellent work and noted what a great honor it was to receive the award. Ms. Deigl stated that she was honored to accept the award and thanked the Board of County Commissioners and the MPO Board for their support. Status Report of Other MPO Advisory Committees No Action Required Mr. Matson reviewed his memorandum, dated December 1, 2017, included in the agenda packet and on file in the MPO Office. Review of Progress Report & Reimbursement Invoice #1 for the 2017/18 Planning Grant Action Required Mr. Matson referred to his memorandum dated November 29, 2017, a copy of which is included in the agenda packet and on file in the MPO Office. ON MOTION BY Commissioner O Bryan, SECONDED BY Commissioner Flescher, the members voted (11 0) to approve the Progress Report and Reimbursement Invoice #1 for the 2017/18 Planning Grant as presented. Presentation of FDOT I-95 Master Plan No Action Required Mr. Matson, MPO Staff Director, gave a brief description of the I-95 Master Plan and introduced Ming Tang Li of FDOT, Mr. Schmidt and Mr. Penfield, of RS&H. Ming Lang Li introduced Mr. Penfield who gave a power point presentation of the FDOT I-95 Master Plan, a copy of which is on file in the MPO office. He noted that the Objectives of the Master Plan are F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MEETING RECORDS\MINUTES\MPO Minutes\2017\MPO 12-13-17 Unapproved.doc 2

to estimate future demand from a regional, 3-county perspective; to define and analyze conceptual design alternatives; and to present recommendations to the Indian River, St. Lucie, and Martin T/MPOs as well as other stakeholders like the Freight community. Mr. Penfield noted the objectives of the SR/I-95 project and was requesting feedback from local governments to include in the regional Master Plan. He noted that the I-95 Master Plan included 75 miles of highway with 15 interchanges. He noted that the Master Plan would be very diverse as the participating counties are diverse and have unique issues Mr. Penfield explained the process, implementation and project schedule. Discussion ensued. Mr. Haverland asked the history of the plan. Mr. Penfield explained that this was the first to be done. Commissioner Zorc requested that I-95/53 rd Ave interchange be considered in future planning. Commissioner O Bryan inquired how speed was set on autonomous vehicles and noted that truck speeds caused safety issues and backups of traffic. Mr. Penfield replied that speed is sensor based and took note. Ms. Savage explained that Brevard County has an influence over the traffic in Fellsmere, particularly if there is a wreck on I-95, with traffic routed through Fellsmere. Mr. Matson noted that the St. John s Heritage Parkway would help with traffic on I-95 and will be interested in traffic counts after it is open. Discussion of Aviation Boulevard and Other Access Improvements in the Vicinity of the 37th Street Corridor No Action Required Mr. Matson gave a power point presentation, a copy of which is located in the MPO office. He noted that 37 th Street was a vital corridor in Indian River County, as it was the primary point of access to the Indian River Medical Center (IRMC) and to a large number of medical-related facilities and businesses. He explained that 37 th Street was approaching capacity and when vested trips are considered, together with existing traffic volumes, 37 th Street was at approximately 90% of its adopted level of service. He explained that the widening of 37 th Street to five lanes presents a number of challenges because, although it was only 1.2 miles long, there were over 24 separate driveways, cross streets, and access points in the corridor. He also explained that there was no way to expand the grid where the hospital is located and road construction along that corridor would be very disruptive for those going for medical care. Mr. Matson noted that one alternative which had been considered by County and City public works and planning staff was to develop a new 2-lane alternative roadway (eg Aviation Boulevard extension) serving the Medical Center to relieve the demand on 37 th Street and in so doing, the County s objective was to both improve access to the area and maintain level of service on 37 th Street at the same time. Discussion ensued. Commissioner Zorc asked what the next step should be, suggesting public workshops, ROW acquisition, putting something on paper. Mr. Matson explained that the concept was at county staff level. Mr. Szpyrka noted that there were 3 different concepts developing and staff was working to have as little effect on property owners as possible. He explained that the concepts would be shown at a future MPO meeting. Ms. Moss inquired if F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MEETING RECORDS\MINUTES\MPO Minutes\2017\MPO 12-13-17 Unapproved.doc 3

this relates to Aviation Boulevard Widening. Mr. Matson noted that Aviation Boulevard needs were being studied and the Airport and City of Vero Beach are the entities that will determine what specific improvements are desired. Presentation of FHWA Performance Measures and Target Setting No Action Required Mr. Matson, MPO Staff Director, gave a PowerPoint presentation, a copy of which is on file in the MPO office. He explained that FDOT required Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to implement performance and outcome-based planning practices. Mr. Matson explained that, according to that legislation, States and MPOs are to invest resources in projects to achieve individual targets in strategic areas that collectively will make progress toward national goals. He noted that the Indian River County MPO has long been a leader in performance monitoring and therefore, performance monitoring and compliance was not expected to be a major issue for the MPO. He explained that FDOT had also pledged to collect the data needed for MPO s to comply with performance monitoring, saving the MPO the cost. He noted that new federal rules required MPOs to integrate performance measures into the Long Range Plan and TIP, which may require the MPO to make some changes to those documents. Mr. Auwaerter inquired what the cost was for non-compliance. Mr. Matson noted that at the present time, there is no financial incentive to meet or exceed performance targets and no penalty for not meeting the targets. Review of MPO Certification Statement No Action Required Mr. Matson referred to his memorandum dated November 30, 2017, included in the agenda packet and on file in the MPO Office. ON MOTION BY Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED BY Chairman McPartlan, the members voted (11 0) to approve the MPO Certification Statement as presented. Other Business Citizens Comment of Jungle Trail Proposal Mr. Matson introduced Mr. Lechowicz who gave a power point, a copy of which is on file in the MPO office. Mr. Lechowicz gave a brief history of Jungle Trail, and then cited many problems with Jungle Trail such as road maintenance, dust, isolation, littering, dumping and F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MEETING RECORDS\MINUTES\MPO Minutes\2017\MPO 12-13-17 Unapproved.doc 4

speeding cars. He suggested using Jungle Trail for Bikes and Pedestrians and closing Jungle Trail, opening it only once a month for vehicular traffic. Commissioner Flescher noted that he supported the County plan for historic Jungle Trail and everyone should be able to enjoy the beauty and tranquility of the trail and be in harmony to share the trail. Several citizens requested that the trail be closed, citing safety as the main issue. Those opposed to closing the trail noted that all taxpayers should have access. Ms. Stanbridge of the County Historical Society spoke in favor of leaving Jungle Trail open. She noted that it was built for cars, not bikes and closing any part of the Trail could jeopardize the National Register of Historic Places designation. She suggested bike riders who wish to avoid cars on Jungle Trail could use the bike path already provided for them on A1A. County Administrator Jason Brown noted that County staff does not support closing Jungle Trail. He explained that it is not unsafe, speed limits have been lowered, signs erected, and closing it and opening it once a month would create an operational problem. 2018 Meeting Schedule Comments from the Public There were none. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:50 AM. F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MEETING RECORDS\MINUTES\MPO Minutes\2017\MPO 12-13-17 Unapproved.doc 5

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA M E M O R A N D U M TO: THROUGH: Members of the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director Phillip J. Matson, AICP MPO Staff Director FROM: Brian Freeman, AICP Senior Transportation Planner DATE: February 2, 2018 SUBJECT: Appointments to the Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) at its meeting of February 14, 2018. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Chapter 427 of the Florida Statues establishes the Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB) to provide direction and oversight for the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) program in Indian River County. As the Designated Official Planning Agency (DOPA), one of the responsibilities of the MPO is to appoint community representatives to the TDLCB. At this time, two TDLCB community representative positions are vacant and have potential candidates: Representative for children at risk: Juliana Minotty-Mendelsohn Senior Community Representative: Catherine Viggiano Ms. Mendelsohn is a new appointment to the TDLCB. A copy of her application is attached. Ms. Viggiano is actually not new to the TDLCB. She served on the TDLCB from 2005-2017 as the representative of the Florida Division for Vocational Rehabilitation (FDVR), a position from which she retired at the end of last year. As a recent retiree and longtime resident of the county, Ms. Viggiano has expressed a willingness to continue serving on the TDLCB as one of the community representatives. During her many years of service on the TDLCB as the FDVR representative, she F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MPO\2018\2-14-18\TDLCB appointments.docx 1

earned a reputation as a valuable contributor to the TDLCB. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends that MPO approve Juliana Minotty-Mendelsohn as the Representative for Children at Risk and Catherine Viggiano as the Senior Community Representative. Attachment 1. Applications from Juliana Minotty-Mendelsohn and Cathy Viggiano F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MPO\2018\2-14-18\TDLCB appointments.docx 2

772 11:47:10 01-15-2018 2/7 Julianna Minotty-Mendelsohn 4221 Diamond SQ Vera Beach, FL 32967 772.202.2807 teacherjdm@gmail.com January 15, 2018 Indian River County Board of Commissioners 180127th St Vera Beach, FL 32960 Greetings: Attached is my resume in application for the open position of Representative, Children at Risk for the Transportation and Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board. I am a Vera Beach native, and moved back to Vera Beach in 2016 after having lived and worked as an educator in Raleigh, NC and Chicago, IL. Currently I work for Childcare Resources of Indian River County, where I interface daily with the population whom this position would represent. As an educator I have seen how access to reliable transportation has a tremendous effect on the education, health and economic security of children and their parents. As a Vero native and now again a resident as an adult, I have seen how the tremendous growth of the county has created a need for a more widespread and accessible public transportation system for all residents. If appointed to this position, I would bring with me a wealth of contacts in various industries in the area, as well as a sincere dedication to helping improve the lives of children and their families in this county. I believe you will find my resume demonstrates I possess many skills that would make me effective in this position. Sincerely, Julianna Minotty-Mendelsohn

772 11:47:19 01-15-2018 3/7 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY APPLICATION FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT Name:Rulianna Minotty-Mendelso~ Full Name:Rulianna Minotty-Mendelsohn Date: p1t13/18 Email Address: ~eacherjdm@gmail.com Street Address (No P.O. Boxes): ~221 Diamond SQ Vera Beach FL 32967 Home Phone:f12 316 9667lwork Phone: Ll, Cell Phone: 1772 202 2807 I How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 11980-2003, 2016-current Are you a full or part time resident? Check one: Full TimelvJPart TimeD Please list current employer or business. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Childcare Resources of Indian River County Please list any licenses you presently hold: Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: Continued on next page

772 11:47:30 01-15-2018 417 Place a check mark next to the committee(s) you would like to serve on: AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE BEACH & SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND PERMIT PROCESS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL HEARING BOARD MPO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MPO CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SCHOOL PLANNING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL D D D ~ D D D D D D D D D D D TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD ~ TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL- COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY D VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD- MUST OWN HOMESTEAD PROPERTY WITHIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY D " " ~' - Please print and return the co.m.. pletedapplication, along with a current resume, to the Board of ~- - - - " - - - --- - -- - -- -- - - - County Commission office, 1801 27th Street, Vera Beach, FL. 32960, or by fax at 772-770-5334. Please note: All applications are kept on file for 6 months.

772 11:47:43 01-15-2018 5/7 4221 Diamond SQ Vero Beach FL 32967 772.202.2807 Julianna Minotty-Mendelsohn K-6 Certified {NC) Bilingual {Spanish/English} MAT NC State University, June 2014 Professional Experience November 2017- Present Childcare Resources of Indian River County Part Time Support and Resource Teacher Providing curriculum and classroom support for ages 0-4 Childcare Resources is a nonprofit with the mission to provide quality childcare and early childhood education for families who do not qualify for Head Start, but who struggle financially with the high cost of childcare. August 2017- Present The Adoption Mentor, LLC www.theadoptionmentor.com Founder and Sole Proprietor Providing support and educational resources for pre-adoptive, adoptive and foster families across the United States. Manages all day to day operational aspects of the business including marketing, client communications, social media, website construction and maintenance, and professional networking with other adoption professionals. 2015-2017 Brainfuse LLC Online Tutor and Editor Edited papers for students in grades 6 through graduate school Tutored students online grades 3 through 12 in language arts, reading and writing Specialized in ESL students Paid hourly and self-scheduled 2014-2015 School Year Mangum Elementary Durham Public Schools 5th Grade Teacher In August, used social media and crowdfunding to independently raise over $150,000 for the Food Bank of the Greater St. Louis Area to help feed students unable to attend school because of events in Ferguson, MO. Received national and local media attention for this achievement (clippings available upon request}

772 11:47:55 01-15-2018 6/7 Taught all subjects to a 5th grade class of 23 students, including several with IEPs and ESL students. Served on the Faculty Technology Committee, helping to implement and train teachers to use a new grading software system. May- June 2014 Leesville Road Elementary Wake County Public Schools Long-Term Substitute Teacher Substituted for a 4th Grade Language Arts teacher for two months. Reviewed content and worked on test preparation skills for the EOG Language Arts Test January-May 2014 Leesville Road Elementary Student Teacher Taught Language Arts to over 50 students, also taught Science and Social Studies to my homeroom class of 26 students. Voluntarily attended the s'h Grade class trip to Washington, D.C. Created a workshop for female students and their mothers that addressed the issue of academic self-confidence. Summer 2011 and Winter 2012 Cross Cultural Solutions Volunteer Teacher Spent 6 weeks (cumulative) volunteering in Cartage, Costa Rica. Worked in a transitory home for Costa Rica's state child welfare agency. Taught and led educational and recreational activities for up to 15 children at a time, ages ranging from 1 to 13. Many of the children in the home had experienced severe abuse and neglect, and suffered from physical, emotional and mental disabilities as a result. Fa/12010 Amazing Minds LLC Teacher Taught daily enrichment in an after-school setting to 1" and 2"d graders at Middleton Elementary in Skokie, IL (District 73.5). Interfaced with parents frequently to update them on their child's progress and any issues. July-August '09 Dominican University Reading Clinic Paraprofessional Worked one-on-one with students in a summer reading clinic sponsored by Dominican University. Students were all in need of remediation. Worked with 3 students total, each of whom advanced 2 grade levels or more in reading fluency by the end ofthe program.

772 11:48:07 01-15-2018 717 Educational Experience 1999-2003 Skidmore College Saratoga Springs, NY Bachelor of Science-Theatre 2004-2006 Columbia College Chicago, IL Master of Arts-Arts, Entertainment and Media Management Focus in Performing Arts Management 2012-2014 NC State University Raleigh, NC MAT Elementary Education K-6 Certified Additional Skills Red Cross First Aid/CPR Certified. Early adopter of new social networking technologies, and an avid writer. Comfortable with most "smartboard" software. Loves Music, Art, Theatre And Film. Native Spanish speaker, familiar with Italian and Latin. Mac and PC proficient. Knowledgeable in Microsoft Office Suite applications including PowerPoint and Excel. Knowledgeable in all Adobe suite applications. Excellent organizational and time management skills. Basic html hand-coding abilities. References Available Upon Request

Brian Freeman From: Sent: To: Subject: Catherine Viggiano <cathyviggiano@att.net> Tuesday, January 30, 2018 11:28 AM Sharon Schalm Transportation Disadvantaged Coordinating Board Hi, Sharon, This e-mail is to confirm my interest in remaining on the Board but now as a Senior Representative. I look forward to the next meeting. Sincerely, Cathy Sent from Yahoo Mail for iphone 1

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA M E M O R A N D U M TO: THROUGH: FROM: Members of the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director Phillip J. Matson, AICP MPO Staff Director DATE: February 1, 2018 SUBJECT: Consideration of the Public Participation Plan (PPP) Update It is requested that the information presented herein be given formal consideration by the Indian River County MPO at the meeting of February 14, 2018 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In 1995, the MPO adopted its first-ever Public Involvement Plan (later renamed the MPO Public Participation Plan). Regular updates to the plan have been made by the MPO, incorporating changes in technology, federal and state requirements, and local policies as appropriate. Perhaps most notable has been the MPO s outreach to traditionally underserved and underrepresented populations, such as minorities and seniors. The MPO has accomplished this by holding in-community workshops and meetings; by participating in local initiatives like the Gifford and Wabasso Neighborhood Plan updates; and through a number of other proactive techniques. In the Spring of 2017, the MPO began a formal plan update to reflect the newest activities, latest guidance, and an evaluation of the effectiveness of existing public involvement practices. As part of that update, the MPO also revised its website to make it a more effective public involvement tool. The Draft Plan Update was advertised and discussed at an MPO-Citizens Advisory Committee workshop held in April. The CAC, which is responsible for citizen outreach and oversight of the MPO, also has members of traditionally underrepresented communities and persons with business and marketing backgrounds. The comments of the CAC were incorporated into a final draft (Attachment 1), which was loaded on the MPO website in November and advertised a number of ways, including newspaper ads, MPO newsletter features, and direct mailouts to interested parties. At its February 14, 2018 meeting, the MPO will be asked to adopt the Update. 1 F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MPO\2018\2-14-18\PPP Update.docx

ANALYSIS Indian River County is known as an engaged, active community and, traditionally, the MPO has had tremendous levels of public involvement, far disproportionate to its small population. To ensure continued success, and to keep abreast of the most recent guidance and techniques, a number of changes were made to the existing Public Participation Plan through this update. Consistency with FDOT Public Involvement Handbook The MPO reviewed the FDOT Public Involvement Handbook and identified areas of consistency with the Handbook and also incorporated changes to the PPP based on practices and policies in the Handbook. References are summarized on Appendix 2 of Attachment 1. Evaluation of Public Involvement Performance Measures The 2016 evaluation identified 8,600 persons participating in MPO programs and activities and over 715,000 website hits. Nearly 3,500 minority and traditionally underserved persons participated. These numbers easily exceeded MPO targets for participation and are summarized in Appendix 3 of Attachment 1. Use of Social Media Following a change in County policy, the MPO in 2017 established permanent Twitter and Facebook pages and uses these outlets in conjunction with the website and email to expand its reach and digital footprint for expanded public participation. Other Changes Minor changes have been made to the areas of considering and incorporating public comments, work with non-profit public groups, and referencing FDOT Public Information Office, to name a few. These appear throughout the document. On January 26 th, the TAC considered the Public Participation Plan and recommended that the MPO approve the plan. The CAC will meet on February 6 th ; the recommendations of the CAC will be reported at the MPO meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the MPO review the Draft Final Public Participation Plan Update, make any changes necessary to the plan, and recommend that the MPO adopt the PPP update. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Final Public Participation Plan Update 2 F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MPO\2018\2-14-18\PPP Update.docx

2017/18 MPO Public Participation Plan Update Indian River County MPO Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. Persons with questions or concerns about nondiscrimination, or who require special accommodations under the American with Disabilities Act or language translation services (free of charge) should contact Phil Matson at (772) 226-1455 or pmatson@ircgov.com. 1

2017/18 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN UPDATE Table of Contents PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN... 3 A. INTRODUCTION AND VISION... 3 B. STRATEGIES FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION... 4 C. CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED... 13 D. PLAN EVALUATION... 13 APPENDICES... 16 Appendix 1 - FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATIONS CONCERNING MPO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION APPENDIX 2 - Incorporation of FDOT Public Involvement Handbook references into the MPO Public Participation Plan APPENDIX 3 - MPO Participation and Objective Achievement 2

A. Introduction & Vision To ensure that transportation systems meet the needs of those that use them, it is vital that the public participates in transportation planning. In developing its plans and programs, the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) provides numerous opportunities for public input. The MPO's Public Participation Plan serves as a guide to further guarantee the active participation of citizens and those affected by MPO decisions. Federal and state regulations require that all MPOs develop a public participation process through which public participation in transportation decision-making is actively solicited. Some of the specific regulations that apply to MPO public participation are listed below. 23 CFR 450, Section 316 (b)(1) contains requirements such as providing the public with timely information about transportation issues, plans, and programs; providing adequate public notice and time for public review of transportation activities; and granting explicit consideration and response to public input received. Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, mandates non-discrimination by race, color or national origin in connection with programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice (1994) requires measures to avoid disproportionately high adverse environmental effects of federal programs through full and fair participation of low-income and minority communities. Chapter 286, Florida Statutes (a.k.a. Florida Sunshine Law) requires public access to governmental meetings at the state and local level and requires meetings of boards and commissions to be open to the public, adequately noticed, and recorded via minutes. FDOT Public Involvement Handbook identifies required public hearings for projects and also best practices for public outreach. In addition, the Public Participation Plan has been developed in consideration of FDOT s Community Impact Assessment process, a five-step methodology advocated by FDOT to identify community needs, analyze impacts and identify solutions. It is the intent of the Indian River County MPO to comply with and, wherever possible, exceed minimum federal and state standards for public participation. To this end, the MPO s Public Participation Plan provides a process that is applicable to all MPO functions and activities. Vision A vision statement is a brief description of what the community hopes to achieve through planning. The MPO will maintain and distribute information and provide public participation opportunities as necessary in order to achieve the following: A well-informed public that feels it has opportunities to contribute meaningful input to decisions concerning the area s transportation system. 3

B. Strategies for Public Participation The MPO s strategies for public participation appear in the following sections and follow a brief description of the section heading. Those strategies also identified by the Federal Highway Administration and Florida Department of Transportation as methods used in best practice organizations are denoted with this symbol ( ). 1) The MPO and Its Committees The Indian River County MPO is the primary agency responsible for transportation planning in the urbanized area of Indian River County. Consisting of 12 voting members representing the local governments within the county, the MPO is a legislative authority with the power to develop and adopt plans, and to set priorities for the programming of improvements to the transportation system. To help make decisions, the MPO uses recommendations from advisory committees. These committees offer input from citizens, bicycle/pedestrian interests, and local technical experts. Technical Advisory Committee The MPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) is composed of technically qualified representatives of agencies responsible for the transportation system in the Vero Beach Urbanized Area. The TAC has a total of 19 voting members. Committee duties include the coordination of transportation planning and programming activities, review of all transportation technical studies and reports, and review of work programs and transportation improvement programs. The principal responsibility of the TAC is to provide technical recommendations to the MPO on transportation matters. Citizens Advisory Committee The MPO Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) consists of 14 members appointed by the MPO governing board. The committee is responsible for providing the MPO with citizen input regarding transportationrelated matters. The composition of CAC membership corresponds to the MPO governing Board membership and includes two at-large members representing the Transportation Disadvantaged and Minority communities. Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee The Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BAC) is composed of bicycling and pedestrian advocates and enthusiasts. While the BAC's major task is the update of the county's bicycle/pedestrian plan, the BAC also provides the MPO with input on enhancement projects and MPO planning activities. Bike Walk Indian River County Bike Walk Indian River County is non-profit group whose members advocate for safer local walking and bicycling conditions. Although not an official MPO committee, BWIRC members work closely with MPO 4

staff to identify and address safety issues. During BWIRC monthly meetings, members of the public often attend and discuss safety issues. BWIRC members relay public safety concerns to MPO staff for further investigation. Conduct of Public Meetings Wherever possible, the MPO and all public meetings will be conducted consistent with the principles contained in Chapter 6 of the FDOT Public Involvement Handbook. Those principles include selecting an appropriate venue, time, and format for the meeting; using innovative communication and data gathering techniques; communicating effectively; and recording the meeting. MPO and Committee Public Participation Objectives It is the intent of the MPO to achieve the following public participation objectives with respect to the MPO and Its Committees. For each objective, measures of effectiveness are included. These measures provide the basis for assessment of the objectives. The assessment process is discussed in Section 5, Plan Evaluation. Objective 1.1: Attendance at MPO and Advisory Committee meetings by non-staff and non-committee members will exceed 100 people. Measure of Effectiveness: Number of non-staff, non-committee member individuals attending MPO and advisory committee meetings during the entire fiscal year. Objective 1.2: The number of comments received at MPO and Advisory Committee meetings will exceed 20 comments. Measure of Effectiveness: The number of comments received at MPO and Advisory Committee meetings during the entire fiscal year. Strategies for public participation in this area MPO and advisory committee meetings are public forums affording citizens an adequate opportunity to participate in the planning process. To enhance these opportunities, the MPO will implement the following strategies: The MPO will appoint members to the Citizens Advisory Committee who adequately reflect the geographic, cultural, and social composition of the MPO area, and will involve those that have been traditionally under-represented in planning such as the senior and low-income communities. The MPO will invite the public to all MPO and advisory committee meetings, and will encourage public discussion and input prior to making decisions at those meetings, with a special emphasis on feedback from the traditionally under-represented. To encourage the open exchange of opinions, the MPO will seek, but not require, a consensus on issues. The MPO will establish a standing agenda item that will invite public comment and participation at all public meetings. 5

All MPO and advisory committee meetings will be conducted in ADA-compliant facilities accessible by public transportation. Information will be collected and feedback will be solicited at public meetings via detailed sign-in sheets (Attachment 1), comment cards, and informational displays. The respective chairpersons of the MPO, CAC, TAC, and BAC will meet periodically with MPO staff to discuss upcoming issues. The MPO will prepare and distribute at all MPO meetings a committee status report listing the activities of the committees, the outcomes of any meetings, and minutes of meetings. The MPO will prepare and distribute at all committee meetings an MPO status report listing the actions of the MPO with regard to committee recommendations. MPO staff reports written for MPO and committee review will be concise and easy to understand. MPO staff and consultants will employ the use of electronic presentations, computer imaging, visualization techniques and other media at public meetings. At the beginning of the calendar year, MPO staff will provide the local media with an annual calendar of scheduled MPO and advisory committee meetings. One week prior to each MPO meeting, MPO staff will provide the local media with a complete agenda package. MPO staff will distribute the minutes of MPO and advisory committee meetings for public review at local libraries, local government offices, and other public locations. This will allow those unable to attend meetings the opportunity to monitor MPO activities. MPO and advisory committee meeting announcements will be sent via e-mail to a database of interested persons and stakeholders. MPO and advisory committee meeting announcements, minutes, and agendas will be posted to the MPO Web Site. MPO and advisory committee meeting PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN ACTION Members of the CAC identified a problem. Travel in the City of Fellsmere was plagued by conflicts, particularly at night, when historic downtown traffic mixed with nonmotorized traffic. Identifying the main problem as one of visibility, members of the CAC took it upon themselves to organize a bike light installation, bike repair, and bike registration event. Over 250 persons, mostly young persons, in the tiny town took advantage. announcements will be published in the proposed MPO quarterly newsletter. Staff will make extensive use of simulators and other visualization techniques to help engage the public. The MPO will maintain its A+ rating for transparency by posting all meeting records, documents, and audio/video recordings. 6

2. MPO Projects and Activities On an annual basis, the MPO develops a number of work products in fulfillment of its statutory obligations. Major MPO projects (which include the Long Range Transportation Plan, Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, and Transit Development Plan Major Update) involve collecting and analyzing background data, procuring consultant services, and performing extensive public outreach efforts. On an annual basis, the MPO also completes a number of activities in preparation of various MPO work products like the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). These activities greatly benefit from public participation but may afford fewer public participation opportunities than major projects due to their scale and relatively short timeframes for completion. Long Range Transportation Plan (and other major MPO projects) The Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is developed by the MPO approximately every five years pursuant to state and federal regulations. The plan provides cost-feasible solutions for the mobility of all residents of the MPO area across a 20-year horizon. Adoption of the Plan and all amendments will be as specified in the MPO Handbook and will include at a minimum 30 days of advertising via web and newspaper, a public hearing and a roll-call vote. Because of the comprehensive nature of the LRTP, the MPO can engage in a wide variety of specialized public participation activities in addition to the general strategies for public participation applicable to all MPO projects. For example, in accordance with FDOT s Community Impact Assessment (CIA) methodology, major MPO projects will incorporate a review of community profiles early on to ensure plan alternatives address community concerns. Community Impact Assessments are comprehensive inventories of communities, their values and characteristics. For the Long Range Transportation Plan and other major MPO projects, the MPO requires the consultant working on the project to create a Public Participation Component as one of the first tasks in the scope of work. The Public Participation Component establishes procedures for public participation specific to the project and ensures that adequate public participation will be performed throughout the project. Public participation activities in the Public Participation Component may include, but are not limited to, strategies described in Section (c), MPO Communications. Innovative techniques will be encouraged in order to directly notify the public of upcoming projects, distribute interim and final reports, and solicit feedback on projects. Final reports for major projects will include a section documenting the participation of the public in developing the project. This section will During the Long Range Transportation Plan Update (2015), over 200 individuals from all segments of the community attended MPO Workshops as part of the Campaign Connect public participation plan. Their input was essential in developing a workable plan. 7

list the proposed opportunities for public input, describe any substantive comments received, and report how substantive comments were handled and considered in the final report. Transportation Improvement Program The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a five-year list of improvement projects that will be undertaken within the MPO area. The projects in the TIP are the direct result of Long Range Plan efforts and the extensive analysis and public outreach that was done therein. The MPO s role with respect to the TIP is focused on the timing of implementing various LRTP alternatives. Throughout the TIP development process, the MPO will seek public input. This input will begin with the development of a list of priority projects (usually in August/September) that the MPO wants the FDOT to fund in its upcoming Work Program. At public meetings, the MPO advisory committees will develop the priority list. The MPO will then review the list, make any necessary changes based on additional public input, and approve the list for submittal to FDOT. Because of the significance of Prioritization in the process, the MPO will take additional measures to obtain input, such as social media outreach. Since many ideas generated by the public during the course of the year are appropriate for inclusion on a priority list, project candidate identification is treated as an ongoing (vs once a year) process. Further public input in TIP development will occur when FDOT presents its Draft Tentative Work Program (usually in November/December) for review and approval by the MPO. The public and the MPO will review the Work Program to ensure that the projects listed conform to the needs of the community. Finally, the MPO and its advisory committees will hold another series of public meetings to consider adoption of the TIP. Copies of the draft TIP will be made available on the website and at a number of public outlets prior to the meetings. The public and the MPO will review the TIP for consistency with the Tentative Work Program and community priorities (April/May). Final TIP adoption and publication is done in a manner consistent with FDOT annual obligations reporting and FTA program of projects reporting. If significant changes to the MPO's adopted TIP are proposed, an opportunity for public comment will be provided. Notice of the discussion of such amendments will be given to the media prior to committee meetings. Unified Planning Work Program The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) is the MPO's annual summary of upcoming planning activities. Every two years, the MPO must submit a UPWP for approval by the Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. The UPWP is developed at public meetings of the MPO advisory committees and the MPO. Prior to these meetings, copies of the draft UPWP are made available for public review and comment. In reviewing the proposed draft UPWP, the public and the advisory committees will provide comments to MPO staff about whether or not the UPWP reflects appropriate work activities for the MPO to undertake in light of local needs and state and federal regulations. 8

All amendments and modifications will be advertised to the public and adopted at a public meeting as specified in FDOT requirements. Congestion Management Process The MPO's Congestion Management Process (CMP) is a process designed to consider alternatives to traditional approaches to solving traffic congestion problems. The MPO uses locally-developed performance measures and current transportation data to identify the most congested links on the County highway system. These links are then evaluated on an individual basis to determine if lower-cost treatments of the congested segment could be employed to eliminate or forestall the need for a more costly highway improvement. The MPO will obtain public input into prioritizing of CMP corridors and strategies for addressing congestion. In fact, many of the more effective CMP strategies implemented were identified by system users. Public participation will be adequately addressed through the MPO s public meetings and communications strategies. Annual CMP updates also present an opportunity to inform the public of current transportation conditions in Indian River County. Public participation activities associated with CMP development will be coordinated with other MPO public participation programs to enhance public awareness and efficiently distribute information. Transit Development Plan (TDP) Updates (and other non-motorized activities) By state law, major updates of the TDP must be developed every five years in order for the County to remain eligible for state grant funding. On an annual basis, TDP minor updates are prepared and serve as evaluation tools to monitor progress toward major update implementation. For TDP Updates and other recurring activities, public participation is accommodated at public committee meetings with distribution of meeting agendas and/or work products to be completed through the MPO s communication strategies. Given the high sensitivity of the transportation disadvantaged public which relies on public transportation, the MPO makes a special emphasis to reach these hard-to-reach segments of the public, such as presenting as part of a Community meeting agenda or event. FDOT Projects Chapter 2 of the FDOT Public involvement Handbook states that FDOT promotes public involvement through all phases of transportation project development. Several manuals and handbooks are available that provide guidance on developing public involvement programs and activities that comply with both state and federal legislation. The PD&E Manual establishes the Department s procedures for complying with state and federal laws for public involvement. The Districts are responsible for conducting public involvement activities for plans (such as the District Work Program) and projects following the procedures and processes established in the PD&E Manual. In addition to District plans and projects, each district planning office has staff that serves as liaisons with their local MPOs. The MPO Program Management Handbook provides guidance to MPOs on their role; how MPO areas are designated, formed, and modified; and on federal and state transportation planning requirements. The MPO cooperates fully with all requirements of the FDOT Public Involvement Process and assists 9

FDOT in securing venues and promoting its public meetings, provides information and contacts, and supports FDOT as needed. Objectives The MPO seeks to achieve the following public participation objectives with respect to MPO Projects and Activities. Measures of effectiveness are included to determine achievement of the objective. Objective 2.1: The number of participants at public workshops from traditionally under-served communities (which includes minorities, low income persons, the elderly, disabled persons, geographically dispersed/transient persons, women, children, and under-educated persons) will exceed 30. Measure Of Effectiveness: Number of participants from traditionally under-served communities during the entire fiscal year. Objective 2.2: The number of comments received from all sources relating to MPO projects or activities will exceed 250 comments. Measure of Effectiveness: Number of comments received from all sources relating to an MPO project or activity. Strategies for public participation in this area Staff will present proposed scopes of work at public committee meetings. The MPO will use public committee meetings to allow the public to review and comment on interim and final work products. MPO staff and consultants may employ the use of electronic presentations, computer simulation, and other media at public meetings. The MPO will establish special consensus-building workshops, charrettes, discussion groups, or other public meetings during the course of project development. These meetings may be held at various locations throughout the county as appropriate. The MPO will include a public participation section documenting the solicitation and incorportation of public comments as as a component of final project reports. To provide information in a concise and understandable format, the MPO will produce an Executive Summary of major improvements for major projects. MPO staff will inform the media of upcoming projects so that interested citizens and officials may have the opportunity to become involved as early as possible. The MPO will make available draft scopes of work and draft work products for public review at MPO offices. MPO staff will seek out innovative methods to inform the public of project activities and allow the public to review and comment on project reports. This may include postings to the MPO Web Site, publication in the proposed MPO newsletter, and the preparation of periodic special edition newsletters, reports or flyers pertaining to the project. In developing major projects, the MPO will abide by FDOT s Community Impact Assessment methodology and its stated principles of informing, educating and including the public in the decision making process. 10

MPO staff will consider all public feedback obtained during the course of its major projects when undertaking related recurring activities. 3. MPO Communications The MPO develops and maintains transportation plans and information that are of interest to and requested by the general public. At the same time, the MPO relies on comments from the public to make sure its plans and activities reflect the values of the community. To fulfill its vision for a well-informed public, the MPO will use a variety of techniques to distribute MPO information and publicize MPO activities. Wherever possible, the MPO will use interactive techniques to obtain valuable feedback from the community in the process of distributing information. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN ACTION During the CR 510 PD&E process, FDOT staff attended several Wabasso Corridor workshops held by County Staff; met with community leaders on over a dozen occasions; and segmented the project into study areas of environmental and social impact where a different approach other than conventional widening would be applied. The result is a unique project that serves the needs of the traveling public, provides alternatives for the nearby TD populations, and preserves the natural environment. It will feature the first Roundabout in the Northern Treasure Coast. Communications strategies cited in this section resulted from evaluating previous plan strategies, identifying best practices of other MPOs, applying new technology, or considering strategies obtained from the public in the development of this plan. Objectives It is the intent of the MPO to achieve the following public participation objectives with respect to MPO Communications. For each objective, measures of effectiveness are included. These measures provide the basis for assessment of the objectives. The assessment process is discussed in Section 5, Plan Evaluation. Objective 3.1: At least 20% of the County s overall population will recognize the MPO or one of its projects or activities. Measure Of Effectiveness: Percentage of the county s overall population that recognizes the MPO, its projects or activities. Objective 3.2: At least 5% of the County s overall population will have been made aware of or actually participated in one of the MPO s public participation activities. Measure Of Effectiveness: Percentage of the county s overall population that has been made aware of or participated in a public participation activity. Objective 3.3: At least 30% of the County s traditionally underserved, which includes transportation disadvantaged and minority populations, will recognize the MPO or one of its projects or activities. 11

Measure of Effectiveness: Percentage of the county s traditionally underserved population that recognizes the MPO, its projects or activities. Strategies for public participation in this area The Indian River County MPO will produce an MPO newsletter on at least a biannual basis. The newsletter will be produced under the guidance of the Citizens Advisory Committee and include major staff activity and milestones. MPO staff will seek innovative ways to distribute information to the public, including the expanded use of the Indian River County Web Site, Social Media, and links to local traffic information sites. MPO staff will seek innovative techniques for soliciting public comment and response to MPO activities. Staff will explore technologies making MPO and County Web Sites compliant with software standards for impaired users. Where feasible, the MPO will coordinate its public participation activities with those of the Public Information Office of the Florida Department of Transportation. These coordination activities may include advertising, mailing notices, and holding public hearings. For construction projects, the MPO will coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation to ensure that the public is adequately involved in the review of Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) Studies. The MPO will prepare a State of the System Report to be distributed in a special newsletter edition. Through the media, the MPO will distribute information and notify the public that information is available from the MPO. The MPO will contribute regularly to a periodic traffic update section of the local newspaper. MPO staff will request that the media publish announcements for MPO meetings and MPO committee meetings. The MPO will explore additional media outlets, such as regional television networks and public radio stations, to announce major projects and activities via Public Service Announcements (PSA s). The MPO will distribute information at local libraries and other public outlets, such as schools and community centers. The MPO will seek out distribution locations in close proximity to those traditionally under-served in the planning process. The MPO will keep environmental agencies and organizations informed of upcoming studies and construction projects. Staff will respond to requests for information as promptly as possible. The MPO will create a presentation display to be posted in public locations and deployed at major community events. The display will include information on major proposed plans, staff contact information, and upcoming opportunities for public participation. The MPO will sponsor or participate in one or more annual transportation seminars in conjunction with state and regional agencies. 12

C. Consideration of Public Comments Received Processing Public Comments The primary objective of any public participation activity is to inform the public and solicit their comments as they relate to transportation improvements. The most common way for the public to relay their ideas and input is through submitting verbal or written comments. The information gleaned from them, if correctly synthesized and catalogued, will serve as an excellent record for future project phases. The amount and types of comments received will help in evaluating the success of the individual public participation activities. A protocol is needed to handle these comments. The following are the MPO procedures for handling public comments: 1. Collection and Documentation: All comments received will be logged and entered into the Public Participation file for the appropriate project or activity. Comments of a highly generalized nature or involving multiple projects will be maintained in the MPO Public Participation file. 2. Acknowledgement and Response If a response is requested, the MPO will indicate that the comment will be considered during an upcoming project or activity cycle. 3. Analysis, Distribution and Incorporation Comments will be acknowledged through a polite and simple email or letter, as appropriate. The MPO will evaluate the comments received as the appropriate project is initiated. Staff will summarize comments received and incorporate these into consultant presentations or committee reports to the MPO as appropriate. The MPO will evaluate draft and final work products with respect to consideration of public comments received. If requested, the MPO will respond with respect to the final disposition of the issue. Staff will perform a preliminary evaluation of the comment. If the comment does not require future MPO action, it will be responded to by staff or routed to the appropriate implementing agency. D. Plan Evaluation Procedure Each year, an evaluation will be performed to determine to what extent objectives for public participation have been met by the MPO. The annual evaluation will be data-driven to the extent possible and will include data collection, data analysis, and a determination of whether or not plan objectives have been met. 13

The MPO and its Committees Recommended period of evaluation: Quantitative measures: MPO Projects and Activities Recommended period of evaluation: Quantitative measures: MPO Communications Recommended period of evaluation: Quantitative Measures: Annual Number of non-staff and non-committee members at MPO and Advisory Committee meetings. Number of comments received at MPO and Advisory Committee meetings. At major project or activity milestones; and at project or activity completion. Number of participants from traditionally underserved communities, including transportation disadvantaged or minority communities, at MPO project or activity workshops. Number of comments received from all sources relating to an MPO project or activity. Annual. Percentage of the county s overall population that recognizes the MPO, its projects or activities. Percentage of the county s overall population that has been made aware of or participated in a public participation activity. Percentage of the county s transportation disadvantaged population that recognizes the MPO, its projects or activities. Public Participation Plan Review and Update Where it is determined that the MPO s public outreach efforts have not resulted in meeting its objectives, the MPO will review its strategies individually using the data collected for each strategy. The MPO will assess the relative contribution of each strategy toward meeting the objective. New strategies may be necessary in order to meet the objective. To obtain new strategies, the MPO will continuously review best practices, suggestions from the public, the FDOT Public Involvement Handbook, and the latest technology. On an annual basis, the MPO will also review its Public Participation Objectives. Where objectives were not met, the MPO will determine whether its objectives were appropriate and contributed to the vision for public participation. Objectives may also be added as a result of updated federal or state guidance or a change in local priorities. Socio-Cultural Effects Evaluation 14

According to Chapter 4 of the FDOT Public Involvement Handbook, The Sociocultural Effects (SCE) Evaluation is the Department s process for identifying and addressing potential effects of transportation projects on people, communities, and community resources. The MPO is the Statewide Leader in Socio- Cultural Effects data development and evaluation, having published the first-ever MPO Socio-Cultural Effects report in 2003. This tool, known as the Community Profile Report, identifies various geographies and communities within the County and assesses their socioeconomic and demographic profiles. Included in this is an assessment of Transportation Disadvantaged populations and key community contacts. It is frequently updated with Census (American Community Survey) data, with the most recent update occurring in 2016. 15

APPENDIX 1 23 CFR FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATIONS CONCERNING MPO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 450.316 Metropolitan transportation planning process: Elements. (b) In addition, the metropolitan transportation planning process shall: (1) Include a proactive public participation process that provides complete information, timely public notice, full public access to key decisions, and supports early and continuing participation of the public in developing plans and TIPs and meets the requirements and criteria specified as follows: (i) Require a minimum public comment period of 45 days before the public participation process is initially adopted or revised; (ii) Provide timely information about transportation issues and processes to citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, private providers of transportation, other interested parties and segments of the community affected by transportation plans, programs and projects (including but not limited to central city and other local jurisdiction concerns); (iii) Provide reasonable public access to technical and policy information used in the development of plans and TIPs and open public meetings where matters related to the Federal-aid highway and transit programs are being considered; (iv) Require adequate public notice of public participation activities and time for public review and comment at key decision points, including, but not limited to, approval of plans and TIPs (in nonattainment areas, classified as serious and above, the comment period shall be at least 30 days for the plan, TIP and major amendment(s)); (v) Demonstrate explicit consideration and response to public input received during the planning and program development processes; (vi) Seek out and consider the needs of those traditionally underserved by existing transportation systems, including but not limited to low-income and minority households; (vii) When significant written and oral comments are received on the draft transportation plan or TIP (including the financial plan) as a result of the public participation process or the interagency consultation process required under the U.S. EPA's conformity regulations, a summary, analysis, and report on the disposition of comments shall be made part of the final plan and TIP; (viii) If the final transportation plan or TIP differs significantly from the one which was made available for public comment by the MPO and raises new material issues which interested parties could not reasonably have foreseen from the public participation efforts, an additional opportunity for public comment on the revised plan or TIP shall be made available; (ix) Participation processes shall be periodically reviewed by the MPO in terms of their effectiveness in assuring that the process provides full and open access to all; (x) These procedures will be reviewed by the FHWA and the FTA during certification reviews for TMAs, and as otherwise necessary for all MPOs, to assure that full and open access is provided to MPO decision making processes; (xi) Metropolitan public participation processes shall be coordinated with statewide public participation processes wherever possible to enhance public consideration of the issues, plans, and programs and reduce redundancies and costs; (2) Be consistent with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Title VI assurance executed by each State under 23 U.S.C. 324 and 29 U.S.C. 794, which ensure that no person shall, on the grounds 16

of race, color, sex, national origin, or physical handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program receiving Federal assistance from the United States Department of Transportation; (3) Identify actions necessary to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327, as amended) and U.S. DOT regulations "Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities" (49 CFR Parts 27, 37, and 38); (4) Provide for the involvement of traffic, ridesharing, parking, transportation safety and enforcement agencies; commuter rail operators; airport and port authorities; toll authorities; appropriate private transportation providers, and where appropriate city officials; and (5) Provide for the involvement of local, State, and Federal environmental, resource and permit agencies as appropriate. (c) In attainment areas not designated as TMAs simplified procedures for the development of plans and programs, if considered appropriate, shall be proposed by the MPO in cooperation with the State and transit operator, and submitted by the State for approval by the FHWA and the FTA. In developing proposed simplified planning procedures, consideration shall be given to the transportation problems in the area and their complexity, the growth rate of the area (e.g., fast, moderate or slow), the appropriateness of the factors specified for consideration in this subpart including air quality, and the desirability of continuing any planning process that has already been established. Areas experiencing fast growth should give consideration to a planning process that addresses all of the general requirements specified in this subpart. As a minimum, all areas employing a simplified planning process will need to develop a transportation plan to be approved by the MPO and a TIP to be approved by the MPO and the Governor. (d) The metropolitan transportation planning process shall include preparation of technical and other reports to assure documentation of the development, refinement, and update of the transportation plan. The reports shall be reasonably available to interested parties, consistent with 450.316(b)(1). Executive Order 12898 Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations February 11, 1994 Section 1-1. Implementation 1-101. Agency Responsibilities To the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, and consistent with the principles set forth in the report on the National Performance Review, each Federal agency shall make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States and its territories and possessions, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Commonwealth of the Mariana Islands. Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 Sec. 2000d. Prohibition against exclusion from participation in, denial of benefits of, and 17

discrimination under federally assisted programs on ground of race, color, or national origin No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. (Pub. L. 88-352, title VI, Sec. 601, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 252.) 286.011 F.S. Public meetings and records; public inspection; criminal and civil penalties.-- (1) All meetings of any board or commission of any state agency or authority or of any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision, except as otherwise provided in the Constitution, at which official acts are to be taken are declared to be public meetings open to the public at all times, and no resolution, rule, or formal action shall be considered binding except as taken or made at such meeting. The board or commission must provide reasonable notice of all such meetings. (2) The minutes of a meeting of any such board or commission of any such state agency or authority shall be promptly recorded, and such records shall be open to public inspection. The circuit courts of this state shall have jurisdiction to issue injunctions to enforce the purposes of this section upon application by any citizen of this state. (3)(a) Any public officer who violates any provision of this section is guilty of a noncriminal infraction, punishable by fine not exceeding $500. (b) Any person who is a member of a board or commission or of any state agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision who knowingly violates the provisions of this section by attending a meeting not held in accordance with the provisions hereof is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. (c) Conduct which occurs outside the state which would constitute a knowing violation of this section is a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. (4) Whenever an action has been filed against any board or commission of any state agency or authority or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision to enforce the provisions of this section or to invalidate the actions of any such board, commission, agency, or authority, which action was taken in violation of this section, and the court determines that the defendant or defendants to such action acted in violation of this section, the court shall assess a reasonable attorney's fee against such agency, and may assess a reasonable attorney's fee against the individual filing such an action if the court finds it was filed in bad faith or was frivolous. Any fees so assessed may be assessed against the individual member or members of such board or commission; provided, that in any case where the board or commission seeks the advice of its attorney and such advice is followed, no such fees shall be assessed against the individual member or members of the board or commission. However, this subsection shall not apply to a state attorney or his or her duly authorized assistants or any officer charged with enforcing the provisions of this section. (5) Whenever any board or commission of any state agency or authority or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision appeals any court order which has found said board, commission, agency, or authority to have violated this section, and such order is affirmed, the court shall assess a reasonable attorney's fee for the appeal against such board, 18

commission, agency, or authority. Any fees so assessed may be assessed against the individual member or members of such board or commission; provided, that in any case where the board or commission seeks the advice of its attorney and such advice is followed, no such fees shall be assessed against the individual member or members of the board or commission. (6) All persons subject to subsection (1) are prohibited from holding meetings at any facility or location which discriminates on the basis of sex, age, race, creed, color, origin, or economic status or which operates in such a manner as to unreasonably restrict public access to such a facility. (7) Whenever any member of any board or commission of any state agency or authority or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision is charged with a violation of this section and is subsequently acquitted, the board or commission is authorized to reimburse said member for any portion of his or her reasonable attorney's fees. (8) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1), any board or commission of any state agency or authority or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision, and the chief administrative or executive officer of the governmental entity, may meet in private with the entity's attorney to discuss pending litigation to which the entity is presently a party before a court or administrative agency, provided that the following conditions are met: (a) The entity's attorney shall advise the entity at a public meeting that he or she desires advice concerning the litigation. (b) The subject matter of the meeting shall be confined to settlement negotiations or strategy sessions related to litigation expenditures. (c) The entire session shall be recorded by a certified court reporter. The reporter shall record the times of commencement and termination of the session, all discussion and proceedings, the names of all persons present at any time, and the names of all persons speaking. No portion of the session shall be off the record. The court reporter's notes shall be fully transcribed and filed with the entity's clerk within a reasonable time after the meeting. (d) The entity shall give reasonable public notice of the time and date of the attorney-client session and the names of persons who will be attending the session. The session shall commence at an open meeting at which the persons chairing the meeting shall announce the commencement and estimated length of the attorney-client session and the names of the persons attending. At the conclusion of the attorney-client session, the meeting shall be reopened, and the person chairing the meeting shall announce the termination of the session. (e) The transcript shall be made part of the public record upon conclusion of the litigation. 19

APPENDIX 2. Incorporation of FDOT Public Involvement Handbook references into the MPO Public Participation Plan FDOT Public Involvement Handbook Objectives MPO Public Participation Plan Page Number Early and continuous public participation 28 Inclusionary practices in activities and notification 5, 8, 11, 21, 23, 28, 29, 30 Consideration of the needs of the traditionally 22, 26, 27 underserved and transportation disadvantaged Collaboration with other agencies, local 5, 11, 12, 28, 29, governments, private sector transportation entities, and non-mpo officials Convenient meeting times and locations 4, 6, 7, 8, 12, 14, 16, 17, 28, 30, 31 Reasonable access to information 11, 12, 13, 21, 23, 28 Timely notice of public participation activities, 5, 8, 9, 10, 19, 21, 28, including appropriate review and comment periods Acknowledgement and consideration of public 20, 21, 24, 25, comments 20

Appendix 3. MPO Public Participation and Objective Achievement 2016 Total Community Participation Minority Community Participation MPO and its Committees MPO and Advisory Committee Meetings 34 12 MPO and Advisory Committee Meeting Comments 25 5 Community Traffic Safety Team 48 14 Bike Walk Indian River County Meetings 100 10 Total Participation 207 41 Objectives Achieved? Y MPO Projects Martin Luther King Trail Opening Ceremony 75 52 Wabasso Neighborhood Meetings 45 41 LRTP Survey 285 N/A LRTP Workshops 170 48 Fellsmere Property Owners Association Meeting 37 2 Total Participation 612 143 Objectives Achieved? Y MPO Activities Bike Rodeos (School) 2915 1399 Bike Rodeos (Public) 450 216 Bike Safety Pre-K 3225 1548 Walk to School/Bike To School Days 200 96 Total Participation 6790 3259 Objectives Achieved? Y Total Participation, Meetings, Projects, and Activities 7609 3443 Other Outreach Efforts Radio programs, newspaper coverage 5 MPO Correspondence Received 420 MPO Newsletters Distributed 500 MPO Website Hits 715,274 Total Contacts 723,808 21

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA M E M O R A N D U M TO: THROUGH: FROM: Members of the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director Phillip J. Matson, AICP MPO Staff Director DATE: February 1, 2018 SUBJECT: Adoption of MPO Safety Performance Targets It is requested that the information presented herein be given formal consideration by the Indian River County MPO at the meeting of February 14, 2018 DESCRIPTION, CONDITIONS & ANALYSIS The Federal Transportation Bill signed by the President in December of 2015, the Fixing Americas Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to implement performance and outcome-based planning practices. According to that legislation, States and MPOs are to invest resources in projects to achieve individual targets in strategic areas that collectively will make progress toward national goals. The performance target for one strategic area, Safety, must be adopted by the MPO Board by February 27, 2018. Targets for the remaining performance measures must be adopted in November of 2018. For each of the listed performance measures, the MPO will have the option of adopting the State s performance target or developing its own. ANALYSIS As previously discussed, FDOT has pledged to collect the data needed for MPO s to comply with performance monitoring. FDOT has collected safety data for each of the adopted performance measures and distributed it to the MPOs (Attachment 1). As can be observed from the table, there is one substantial limitation to the data. FDOT collects data on crashes and miles traveled Countywide. Therefore, for Indian River County as well as other counties with relatively small urban areas, there may be a discrepancy F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MPO\2018\2-14-18\Review and Update of Performance Measures.doc 1

between Countywide crash rates and MPO area (Urbanized and Transitioning) crash rates. In fact, we suspect this to be the case, as SR 60 between CR 512 and Yeehaw Junction, for example, has a substantial safety problem. FDOT has promised to address this situation for the affected MPOs. Adoption of Safety Targets According to statute, the MPO must select Safety Targets for each of the adopted Performance Measures. Those Measures, which are included in Attachment 2, are: 1. Average Annual Fatalities; 2. Average Annual Serious Injuries; 3. Average Annual Fatality Rate; 4. Average Annual Serious Injury Rate; and 5. Average Annual Pedestrian and Bicycle Serious Injuries. There are a number of important caveats with respect to the data. First, in a County like Indian River, there are so few fatalities and serious injuries that a single major incident could bias crash numbers and crash rates. To mitigate this, FDOT has supplied 5-year moving average data. Another consideration is the basis upon which the rate is calculated. The denominator in the Safety Rate is Millions of Vehicle Miles Traveled, or VMT. Since there is no way to accurately count all of the miles traveled, FDOT uses a statistical formula. There appear to be discrepancies with the collection of the data that could affect the rates. As seen on Attachment 1, Indian River has approximately 50% less VMT (16.6 million) than Charlotte and Martin Counties and the Heartland TPO (Sebring/Okeechobee areas), despite having comparable populations. Target Options The MPO has two options with respect to adoption of Safety Targets: Adopt FDOT safety targets; or develop its own targets. With respect to each of the 5 Performance Measurement Categories, FDOT has adopted an aspirational target of zero crashes, fatalities, and injuries (Attachment 1). The selection of zero as a target is consistent with the Governor s Policy and a broad national Vision Zero movement which has set out to eliminate all unnecessary highway injuries and fatalities. As of January, 7 MPOs have formally adopted Vision Zero as their target. Alternatively, 3 MPOs adopted targets based on actual safety trendlines. In each case, these MPOs aspired to reduced crashes and/or crash rates. While perhaps a more realistic approach, it is difficult for small MPOs to achieve consistency from year to year since the number of crashes, particularly those with fatalities, are very small. In fact, Indian River County has had 0 bicycle fatalities in 3 of the past 5 years. F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MPO\2018\2-14-18\Review and Update of Performance Measures.doc 2

Adopting the state s aspirational targets demonstrates consistency with the majority of MPO s (including those in our area) and with FDOT and MPO Safety Plans. Therefore, staff is recommending adoption of the State s performance target. On January 26, 2018, the TAC considered the issue of safety performance targets and recommended that the MPO adopt the State s targets. The CAC will meet on February 6, 2018. The CAC will also consider staff recommendations on safety performance targets. The recommendations of the CAC will be reported to the MPO at the February 14, 2018 meeting. It should be noted that there is no financial incentive to meet or exceed performance targets, and the consequences for not meeting them are limited and mostly apply to state investment policy. In the future, meeting performance targets could be integrated into the funding process, but the MPO and FDOT will have many opportunities to revisit targets. The MPO can and will monitor performance closely irrespective of the target chosen. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the MPO approve the attached resolution adopting the State s Safety Performance Targets as identified on Attachment 2. ATTACHMENT 1. Florida Safety Data Spreadsheet 2. Resolution Adopting State Transportation Safety Targets F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MPO\2018\2-14-18\Review and Update of Performance Measures.doc 3

~ s:;j <..~ ::c :s: rl"1 :z --f ~ MPO/TPO Space Coast TPO Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO Broward MPO Hernando/Citrus MPO Hillsborough County MPO North Florida MPO PolkTPO Lee County MPO Martin MPO Miami-Dade Urbanized Area MPO Collier County MPO Ocala/Marion County TPO METROPLAN Orlando Bay County TPO Pasco County MPO Pinellas County MPO Sarasota/Manatee MPO St Lucie TPO Capital Region TPA Palm Beach MPO Lake-Sumter MPO Heartland Regional TPO FOOT Co1.1nty Number 26 Alachua 48 Escambia 58 Santa Rosa 57 Okaloosa 60 Walton 73 Flagler 79 Vol usia 88 Indian River County Name MPO/TPO Single County SmgleCount) Single County Multiple Countu~10 Single County Multipl ~ Countie s Smgle County Single County S.tngle Cou nty Single County Single Coontv Single County Multiple Counties Sir~g l e County Single Countv S1t1gle County Multiple Countif'$ Single County MultiplE" Counti >$ Si ngle County Mult1ple Counties Multiplt> Counties Gainesville MTPO Florida-Alabama TPO Florida-Alabama TPO Okaloosa-Walton TPO Okaloosa-Walton TPO River to Sea TPO River to Sea TPO Indian River County MPO FHWAPerfMeasperMPO Average Annual Average Annual Serious Average Annual Fatality Fatalit ies 1 Injuries 2 Rates 3 2011-15 2012-16 2011-15 2012-16 2011-15 2012-16 Average %1\ Average %1\ Average %1\ Average %1\ Average %1\ Average %1\ 69.6 5.1% 74.8 7.5% 601.4-1.0% 630.8 4.9% 1.159 5. 1% 1.218 7.5% 21 4 19~ 22 6 56% 1346-9.8% 127 0-5.6% 0.969 19% 0 998 5 6% 183.0 4.6% 199.6 9.1% 1,888.8-5.7% 1,776.0-60'.<\ 1.109 4.6% 1.205 9.1% 49 2 4.7% 49.8 12% 445.0 3 8% 4612 3.6% 1471 4.7% 1464 1.2% 168.4 4.6% 183.8 9.1% 1,752.0-8.8% 1,618.0-7.6% 1.308 4.6% 1.400 91% 183.4 6.1% 201.4 9.8% 1,341.4 3.2% 1,3710 22% L!88 6.1% 1.272 9.8% 99 8 5.9% 108.6 8.8% 499 6-7.3% 480.8-3.8% 1.579 5.9% 1648 8.8% 81.0 7.1% 87.0 7.4% 460.4 0.5% 499.0 8.4% 1.187 7.1% 1.229 7.4% 24 2 2.5% 25.4 50% 107 0-8.1% 103 0-37% 1186 2 5% 1.246 5.0% 265.0 7.5% 273.8 3.3% 1,992.2 0.0% 1,894.4-4.9% 1.378 7.5% 1.417 3.3% 388 4.3% 38.0 -U% 175 2 0 7% 177.2 11% 1183 43"-' l ill -21% 60.0-1.0'.<\ 61.6 2.7% 3268-91% 3278 0.3j! 1.475-1.0% 1.478 2.7",6 218 4 3.7% 226 0 3 S% 2,318 6 22.5% 2,640.0 139% 1073 3.7% 1.089 3.5% 27.2 11.5% 30.0 10.3% 255.2 1.9j! 234.6-8.1% 1.476 11.5% 1.596 10.3% 66.8-1.5j! 714 6,9% 933.0 7.1% 1,032..6 10.7% 1.592-1.5% 1.661 69% 102 8 la% 105 8 2.9% 1,194 6-1.9~' 1,175 2-1.6% 1 29o 14% 1.310 2.9"-' 87.4 7.1% 998 14 2% 907 0 16.6% 1,131.2 24.7% 1.160 7.1% 1.289 14.2% 31.0 4.0% 33 6 SA% 166,6-4.3~' 165 0-10% 0.985 4 0'.4 1064 8A% 51.4-30% 55.6 8.2% 2786-11.2% 266.0-4.5% 1.208-3.0% 1.279 8.2% 139.8 10.1% 153.4 9.7% 1,026.2-1.3% 1,054.2 2.7% 1.100 10.1% 1.185 9.7% 64 4 5.2% 66.4 31% 340A 2A% 364 6 7.1% 1410 5.2"-' 1 423 31% 57 4 2.9",6 60.8 5.9% 299.8-3.4% 342.0 14.1% 2.025 2.9".<\ 2.105 5.9".<\ Average Annual Average Annual Serious Average Annual Fatality Fatalities 1 lnjuries 2 Rates 3 2011-15 20U-16 2011-15 2012-16 2011-15 2012-16 Average %1\ Average %6 Average %1\ Average %1\ Average %1\ Average %1\ 32.8 7.2% 36.6 11.6% 265.6-3.7% 264.0-0.6% 1.137 6.0'.<\ 1.242 9.2% 44 2 6.3% 44A 0.5% 321 4-14.9% 281.6-12A% 1298 5.7% 1 289-07% 21.8-1.8% 200-8.3% 218 0-6.4% 189.6-130",0 1.081-2.2% 0.978-9.5% 27.0 12.5% 26.6-1.5% 202.4-4.7% 184.0-9.1% 1.284 11.4% 1.247-2.9% 14.2-22.0% 14.2 0.0% 137.8-0.3% 121.0-12.2% 1.198-23.3% 1.160-3.2% 17.8-11 0',6 18.4 3.4% 137 8-13 9'-' 119A -13.4% 1.542-14.2"-" 1504-2.5% 89--l -4.1" 9GA 8 1% 630 2-4.3% 6384 1..3% 1 624-43% 1.715 56% 19.4-2.0% 20.6 6.2% 115.8-2.7% 127.2 9.8% 1.262-3.8% 1.322 4.8% Average Annual Serious 4 Injury Rates Average Annual Pedestrian and Bicyclist Fatalities and Serious lniuriess 2011-15 2012-16 2011-15 2012-16 Average %1\ Average %6 Average %6 Average %1\ 10.033-0.6% 10.363 3.3% 86.6 5.4% 90.2 4.2% 6127-107% 5 676 --7 410 21 4-70% 20A -4 7% 11.447-6.8% 10.797 5.7% 341.4-2.6% 352.2 3.2% 13 329 31% 13 560 1.7"-' 41.0 13.3% 43 2 54% 13650-96% 12 430-8 9% 246.0 1.4% 242.6-1.4% 8.717 2.0% 8.727 0.1% 191.8 5.5% 1962 2.3% 7959 10.0% 7 392-71% 63.6-2.5% 67A 60% 6.786-2.0% 7.101 4.6% 84.0 5.0',6 91.0 8.3% s 269-8--Z% 5 117-2.9j! 16--l -6,9% 14 0 -H.6% 10.386 0.0% 9.854-5.1% 446.0 4.7% 436.0 2.2% 5 3S8 -lol! 5.ZS2-2 5" 37 6-2 6% 40.0 6.4" 8.069-9.9% 7.894-2.2% 38.0-2.6% 41.2 8.4% 11309 20.3% 12.627 11.7% 3418 13.9% 3758 9.9% 13.897 1.0'-' 12.559-9.6% 34.4 17.0" 37.6 9.3% 22077 38% 23.905 8..3% 109.0 -OSj! 115.6 6 1% 15068 1 2% 14.594-3 1% 217 2 1 6"-' n 1o 1 7% 11.986 14.2% 14.504 21.0% 142 8 6.4% 160.0 12.0'-' 5.276-5.1% 5.236-0 8% 26.8-5.6% 24 0-104% 6.539-11.2% 6.143-6.1% 42.4 2.4% 44.0 3.8% 8.105-3.1% 8.195 1.1% 200.6 3.7% 203.2 1.3% 7 425-5.8% 7742 4 3l! 38 8-2.0% 40 8 5.~-" 10.577-4.6% 11.750 Ill% 33.2-5.1% 32.6-1.8% Average Annual Serious Injury Rates 4 ""'"6"'... Pedestrian and Bicyclist Fatalities and Serious -c 2011-15 2012-16 2011-15 2012-16 Average %1\ Average %6 Average %1\ Average %1\ 9.217-4.8% 8.959-2.8% 37.0-3.1% 37.8 2.2%, 9.450-15.3% 8182-13A% 55.4-8.0% 54 4-1.8% 10.821-67% 9.245-14.6% 15 0-13% 15.8 5.3% 9.681-5.3% 8675-10.4% 30.8 6.2% 28.6-7.1% 11.609-2.0% 9.954-14.3% 9.4 4.4% 8.6-8.5% 12.239-171% 10 274-16.1% 15,8 11.3% 15.6-13% 11485-4.4% 11.387-09" 89.0-4.1% 888-0 2",6 7.568-4.0'-' 8.194 8.3% 16.2 11.0',6 17.6 8.6" 2016 _FHWA _Performa ncemeas u res per_ M PO _i ncl udi ng2009-2016 _Updated 2017-12-29.xlsx

MPO/TPO FHWAPerfMeasperM PO 100 MVMT annually per Florida Department of Transportation Office of Transportation Data and Analytlcs Reports of H1ghwy M 1leage and Travel {DVMT) http:/ /www.fdot.gov/plannlng/statis 2015 2016 Space Coast TPO 61.4551679 65.6673691 Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO 23.3980126 24.1093503 Broward MPO 166.9024306 173.5313859 Hernando/Citrus MPO 34.8425795 36.3607703 Hillsborough County MPO 133.9419918 139.5862540 North Florida MPO 162.9394837 169.8187099 Polk TPO 70.4824763 73.5520564 Lee County MPO 73.4605836 76.3918755 Martin MPO 21.1944602 22.3889273 Miami-Dade Urbanized Area MPO 195.3322710 199.9572680 Collier County MPO 35.6256775 37.2453963 Ocala/Marion County TPO 42.4959020 44.6672492 METROPLAN Orlando 212.6036351 225.2285258 Bay County TPO 19.2580101 19.5650006 Pasco County MPO 44.2452283 45.8978006 Pinellas County MPO 82.0184061 84.1336410 Sarasota/Manatee MPO 79.2540536 81.7743031 St Lucie TPO 32.1329574 33.2895760 Capital Region TPA 44.3689142 45.5404039 Palm Beach MPO 133.0681067 138.6731715 Lake-Sumter MPO 49.3614868 52.1561969 Heartland Regional TPO 30.1160191 31.2070263 County Name 100 MVMT annually per Florida Department of Transportation Off1ce of Transportation Data and Analyt1cs Reports of Highwy M ileage and Travel {DVMT) 2015 2016 Alachua 30.1176460 31.1408361 Esca mbia 34.7030748 35.6270207 Santa Rosa 20.8090931 21.3461121 Oka loosa 21.5839648 22.3419337 Walton 12.8608789 12.9795784 Flagler 13.4308269 13.7855029 Vol usia 57.2630727 59.5853199 Indian River 15.8210384 16.6065394 2016_FHWA_PerformanceMeasuresper_MPO_including2009-2016_ Updated2017-12-29.xlsx

RESOLUTION 2018-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ADOPTING TRANSPORTATION SAFETY TARGETS WHEREAS, the Indian River County MPO is the duly designated and constituted body responsible for carrying out the urban transportation planning and programming process for Indian River County; and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes 339.175; 23 U.S.C. 134; and 49 U.S.C. 5303 require that the urbanized area, as a condition to the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance, have a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process that results in plans and programs consistent with the comprehensively planned development of the urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the FHWA issued a final rule based on section 1203 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) and with consideration to provisions in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), which identified national transportation goals, outlined standards for measuring and reporting safety data and established five safety performance measures; and WHEREAS, in accordance with 23 C.F.R. 490.209(a), the Florida Department for Transportation (FDOT), as part of the annual development of the State Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP), has developed safety targets for each of the five safety performance measures which aspire to eliminate all serious injuries and fatalities in the State as detailed in Attachment A ; and WHEREAS, 23 C.F.R. 490.209(c), requires that each Metropolitan Planning Organization establish safety targets and report progress over time in reaching the adopted targets NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MPO APPROVES ADOPTING FDOT S TRANSPORTATION SAFETY TARGETS AS DETAILED IN ATTACHMENT A

THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by, and the motion was seconded by, and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Ed Dodd, City of Sebastian Susan Adams, Indian River County Joseph Flescher, Indian River County Shawn Frost, School District of Indian River County Dick Haverland, Town of Indian River Shores Laura Moss, City of Vero Beach Bob McPartlan, City of Sebastian Peter D. O Bryan, Indian River County Sara Savage, City of Fellsmere Bob Solari, Indian River County Lang Sykes, City of Vero Beach Tim Zorc, Indian River County The Chairperson thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this, 2018. day of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Mayor Bob McPartlan, Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: COUNTY ATTORNEY

2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 34. Safety Performance Targets Calendar Year 2018 Targets* Number of Fatalities Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for total fata1itics on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 2, 716 and 3, 052 in 2018. This forecast was made by combining F ARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2016 to predict probable outcomes for 2017 and 2018. Florida's target for fatalities is zero in 2018. While the data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for fatalities could continue to trend upward in 2017 and 2018, the FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will mitigate, the data forecast and ultimately reduce the number of traffic fatalities. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for fatalities is zero in 2018, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of3,052 in order to satisfy the federal requirement. ~umhl'j' of Suiou~ lu jur i c~ 1.1 Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for total serious injuries on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 18,831 and 20,861 in 2018. This forecast was made by combining PARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2016 to predict probable outcomes for 2017 and 2018. Florida's target for serious injuries is zero in 2018. The data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for serious injuries could continue to trend downward in 2017 and 2018. The FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance this downward trend in the number of serious injuries on Florida's roads. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for serious injuries is zero in 2018, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of20,861 in order to satisfy the federal requirement. Fatalit~ lbtt. o. tno Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for fatality rate per 100 million VMT on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 1.06 and 1.65 in 2018. This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2016 to predict probable outcomes for 2017 and 2018. Florida's target for fatality rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2018. While the data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for fatality rate per 100 million VMT could continue to trend upward in 2017 and 2018, the FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will mitigate the data forecast and ultimately reduce the number of traffic fatalities. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for fatality rate per l 00 million VMT is zero in 2018, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 1.65 in order to satisfy the federal requirement St riotl' Injury Rate '..... ~. :"'.. - 4 -... ATTACHMFNT A

2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 7.57 and 11.06 in 2018. This forecast was made by combining F ARS data with current state data fi om 2009 to 2016 to predict probable outcomes for 2017 and 2018. Florida's target for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2018. The data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT could continue to trend downward in 2017 and 2018. The FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance this downward trend in the serious injury rate per 100 million VMT. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2018, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 11.06 in order to satisfy the federal requirement. Tot:1l ;\' umhl..'r of J\"on -J\Jotori!l ll Fatalities and ScriotJ'\ In.iuri l.'~ 0.1 Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 3,066 and 3,447 in 2018. This forecast was made by combining F ARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2016 to predict probable outcomes for 2017 and 2018. Florida's target for non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries is zero in 2018. The data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries could continue to trend downward in 2017 and 2018. The FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance this downward trend in non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries is zero in 2018, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 3,447 in order to satisfy the federal requirement. Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information. Florida shares the national traffic safety vision, "Toward Zero Deaths," and formally adopted our own version of the national vision, "Driving Down Fatalities," in 2012. FDOT and its traffic safety partners are committed to eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries with the understanding that the death of any person is unacceptable and based on that, zero deaths is our safety performance target. This target is consistent throughout our Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Plan. Florida's data forecasts have been established using an ARIMA Hybrid Regression Model (0, 1,1)(2,0,0)(12) with VMT. Nine independent variables were tested to assess correlations; only Vehicle Miles oftravel (VMT) and gas consumption have relatively high correlations with fatalities and serious injuries and of these two variables only VMT was useful in predicting future fatalities and serious injuries. The first three performance measures (number of fatalities, number of serious injuries, and fatality rate per 1OOM VMT) have been forecasted based on a five year rolling average and the remaining performance measures will be forecasted annually. The forecasts for 2017 and 2018 are based on monthly data from 2005 through 2016 using statistical forecasting methodologies.

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA M E M O R A N D U M TO: THROUGH: Members of the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director Phillip J. Matson, AICP MPO Staff Director FROM: Brian Freeman, AICP Senior Transportation Planner DATE: February 1, 2018 SUBJECT: 2018 Transit Development Plan (TDP) Major Update Presentation It is requested that the information presented herein be given formal consideration by the Indian River County MPO at the meeting of February 14, 2018 SUMMARY According to state and federal regulations, the Indian River County MPO must prepare and adopt a Major Update of its Transit Development Plan (TDP) by September 30, 2018. In 2017, the MPO issued a Notice to Proceed (NTP) to its general planning consultant, Tindale-Oliver and Associates, to initiate the TDP major update. Since then, the consultants have met regularly with MPO and Senior Resource Association (SRA) staff and have provided staff with a number of draft work products. Staff recommends that the MPO consider the presentation at the February 14, 2018 meeting and provide comments to staff. DESCRIPTION, CONDITIONS, & ANALYSIS According to state and federal regulations, the Indian River County MPO must prepare and adopt a Major Update of its Transit Development Plan (TDP) by September 30, 2018. Adoption of a TDP is required in order to receive grant funding under the Public Transportation Block Grant (PTBG) program. That program provides approximately $500,000 annually in operating assistance. In 2012, the MPO issued a Notice to Proceed (NTP) to its general planning consultant, Tindale- Oliver and Associates, to initiate the TDP major update. Since then, the county s TDP consultants have undertaken some preliminary TDP development activities. Those activities include drafting a F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MPO\2018\2-14-18\TDP staff report.docx 1

public outreach plan, analyzing demographic trends within the community, and conducting a peer trend analysis of the county s fixed route (GoLine) and demand response (Community Coach) transit systems. One essential component of the TDP major update is public outreach. As one of the first TDP activities, the consultants drafted a public outreach plan for the project. That outreach plan calls for surveying transit users and operators, conducting public workshops throughout the county, and reaching out to non-users at public locations. Late last year, transit system users were surveyed by the consultant. As part of that effort, onboard questionnaires were administered to GoLine passengers, while surveys were sent by mail to Community Coach passengers with a postage-paid return envelope. On November 9, 2017, the consultant conducted two public listening sessions at the Main Transit Hub and at the UP Harvest Grocery Center. Future activities include public workshops that will be conducted this spring. Besides the public outreach efforts discussed above, the consultants have conducted a demographic assessment of the county and a peer trend analysis of the GoLine and Community Coach systems. A peer trend analysis is an efficiency review of those services in comparison to other similar systems. Those efforts culminated in two draft reports that were recently submitted to MPO staff. At this time, those reports are being reviewed by MPO staff. Upon completion of that review, those reports will be incorporated into the TDP document and submitted to the MPO for review and approval. At the February 14, 2018 meeting, the MPO will consider a presentation by the Consultant regarding the TDP activities conducted thus far and the future steps ahead. Although not an action item, the TDP presentation also contains a consensus building exercise that gauges opinions of committee members on a number of policy issues. Relevant feedback from the TAC and CAC will be presented to the MPO as part of the consultant presentation. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the MPO consider the presentation at the February 14, 2018 meeting and provide comments to staff. F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Meetings\MPO\2018\2-14-18\TDP staff report.docx 2

RICK SCOTT GOVERNOR Florida Department of Transportation 3400 West Commercial Blvd. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 JIMBOXOLD SECRETARY December 21, 2017 Mr. Philip Matson, Executive Director Indian River MPO 1801 27 11 Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 SUBJECT: Indian River MPO TIP Amendment Request FY 2017/18-2021122 FM No. 405606-2-C2-10 Dear Mr. Matson: Pursuant to Title 23 and Title 49, the Florida Department of Transportation requests your processing and approval of the attached amendment to the FY 2017/ 18-2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program. This amendment is required because the project manager has added Phase C2 for Environmental Services in the amount of $125,406.00 in FY 2018 of STP funds. This Transportation Improvement Program Amendment is consistent with the Adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and the adopted TIP remains financially constrained. Please contact me at (954) 777-4365 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Myros1ava (Mira) Skoroden Planning Specialist District Four The above TIP amendment was authorized to be included in the FY 2017118-2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program. Mr. Philip Matson Director www.dot.state.fl.us

Indian River MPO Transportation Improvement Program - FY 2017/18-2021/22 Roadway Capacity Projects CR 510 Widening 4056062 Non-SIS Work Summary: PD&E/EMO STUDY From: CR 512 To: 58th Avenue Lead Agency: FDOT Length: 5.27 miles County: Indian River LRTP #: Table 7-1 Fund Phase Source 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 Total ENV SA (STP) 125,406 0 0 0 0 125,406 Total 125,406 0 0 0 0 125,406 Prior Cost < 2017/18: Future Cost > 2020/21: Total Project Cost: Project Description: 0 0 8,216,958 Widen CR 510 (85th Street) from 2 lanes to 4 lanes between CR 512 and 58th Avenue. Project length is 5.27 miles. Preliminary engineering programmed for FY 2017/18 and ROW acquisition programmed for FY 2019/20 through 2020/21. Environmental C2 Phase to project, 125,406 additional funding. Adopted June 14, 2017 - Amended December 27, 2017 A-16