Defining Roles within the Cancer Registry

Similar documents
Objectives. Cancer Registry Abstracting

Program Highlights. A User s RQRS Experience Mildred Nunez Jones, BA, CTR Northside Hospital Cancer Institute

NCDB Special Study: Post-Active Treatment Surveillance in Prostate Cancer Webinar #7: NCRA /23/17 Eileen Tonner, MS

Oncology Data Management Systems

5/12/2011. Important Accreditation Facts: New Program Categories, Accreditation Awards, Commendations and the OAA

Chapter 11. Expanding Roles and Functions of the Health Information Management and Health Informatics Professional

AHIMA/NCRA Cancer Registry Management Program PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENT

2012 CoC Standards: University of Kansas Hospital Cancer Committee Goals. Tim Metcalf, BS, CTR Cancer Registry Manager

Survivorship Care: Building a Program

DATA QUALITY AND DATA USES. Agenda. Chicago, Illinois. Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Advanced Medical Homes: Bending the Trend. Alan Glaseroff, MD Co-Director Stanford Coordinated Care

10/28/2011. Important Accreditation Facts: New Program Categories, Accreditation Awards, Commendations and the OAA

Presentation Objectives

Administrative Approval: Vice President of Professional Services

Questions to ask your doctor about Lung Cancer and selecting a treatment facility

The Impact of Physician Quality Measures on the Coding Process

ORGANIZATIONAL MANUAL OF THE MEDICAL STAFF

Domain 1 Patient Engagement

Agenda. Meaningful Use: What You Really Need to Know. Am I Eligible? Which Program? Meaningful Use Progression 6/14/2013. Overview of Meaningful Use

Health Sciences Centre, Team C, Dr. M. Wells (Breast and Hernia) Medical Expert

ASSOCIATION OF CANCER EXECUTIVES UPDATE

Changing Paradigm of Cardiovascular Care- Service Line vs Departmental

CALIFORNIA CAREER PATHWAYS

Health Care IT Advisor. Meaningful Use 101. What You Need to Know August 26, Naomi Levinthal, MA, MS, CPHIMS Consultant, Health Care IT Advisor

A Hear from Your Peers Webinar Effective Coordination between Hospitals and CoC Homeless Assistance Providers Results in Improved Residential

Patient Navigation Programs Leveraging Care Pathways. Tina Evans, RN, BS Director of Nursing,Onco-Nav

Financial Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Reducing GI Surgery Re-Admissions, While Increasing Patient Satisfaction

COLLEGE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

Stanford Coordinated Care

Meaningful Use Stage 2

DRAFT Optimal Care Pathway

EHR Enablement for Data Capture

FALL NEWSCLiPs. An Update for Cancer Liaison Physicians from the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons

The spoke before the hub

The Cancer Workforce: Crossing the Continuum of Disease and Care

HT 2500D Health Information Technology Practicum

1/25/15. Equicare Health. Patient Management & Retention: Clinical And Financial Implications. Clinical Implica+ons of Pa+ent Management

Initial Assessment, Survivorship Care Plans

Community Health Workers: Credentialing and New Opportunities

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Advancing to the Next Generation of Value Based Pay for Performance

UNC2 Practice Test. Select the correct response and jot down your rationale for choosing the answer.

Thirty-three three Years of Rapid Case Ascertainment: Lessons Learned

2/20/2013. Statewide, Population-Based, Incidence. Dr. Youjie Huang DOH State Director of Cancer Registry Operations

FAIRFIELD MEDICAL CENTER MEDICAL STAFF ORGANIZATION MANUAL

APEx Program Standards

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Fully Affiliated with the University of Toronto

Appendix A WORK PROCESS SCHEDULE AND RELATED INSTRUCTION OUTLINE. Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist Apprenticeship

Battlefield Trauma Systems

managed care solutions

Patient Navigation: A Multidisciplinary Team Approach

MEDICAL STAFF ORGANIZATION MANUAL

Defining an Outcome Measures Framework for Global Surgery

INTEGRATED DATA ANALYTICS AND CARE WORKFLOW OPTIMIZATION

Season s Greetings from all of us to all of you!

CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements. Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013

Title: Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Addressing Knee Instability, Restoring Function, and Reducing Pain & Opioid Usage

Evidence-Based Practices to Optimize Prescriber Use of PDMPs

HMIS GOVERNANCE CHARTER OF THE BROWARD HOMELESS CONTINUUM OF CARE FL-601

Standards of Practice for Professional Ambulatory Care Nursing... 17

L8: Care Management for Complex Patients: Strategies, Tools and Outcomes

PATIENT CENTERED. Medical Home. Attestation. Facility Compliance

Thought Leadership Series White Paper The Journey to Population Health and Risk

Note: This is an outcome measure and will be calculated solely using registry data.

Using Data for Proactive Patient Population Management

Ministry of Health Patients as Partners Provincial Dialogue Report

Beyond Cost and Utilization: Rethinking Evaluation Strategies for Complex Care Programs

HOW TO GET SPECIALTY CARE AND REFERRALS

National Program of Cancer Registries - Modeling Electronic Reporting Project (NPCR-MERP)

Indianapolis Transitional Grant Area Quality Management Plan (Revised)

Accreditation of your office-based vascular lab: A must

Measure #389: Cataract Surgery: Difference Between Planned and Final Refraction - National Quality Stategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Oncology Patient Navigation: Past, Present and Future

Blueprint Integrated Pilot Programs

Productivity A Meaningful Model Tuesday June 14, 2016 AAMD 41 st Annual Meeting

NCORPs Navigating Site Codes/ MD Registrations

Benchmarking variation in coding across hospitals in Canada: A data surveillance approach

Model of Care Scoring Guidelines CY October 8, 2015

Health Care that revolves around you.

Value-based Care Report. February How Value-based Care is improving quality and health.

CPC+ CHANGE PACKAGE January 2017

U.H. Maui College Allied Health Career Ladder Nursing Program

Presentation Objectives

A Qualitative Study of Master Patient Index (MPI) Record Challenges from Health Information Management Professionals Perspectives

Oncology Home Care: A Strategy for Growth & Improved Clinical Performance. Our Story. What s So Special About Specialty Care?

NursingCAS Learning & Networking Workshop

Calendar Year 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule

KanCare All MCO Training Physicians and Specialists Spring 2018

Population Health Value in the Context of the Triple Aim

Stage 2 -Medent Imaging & CQM & Clinical Decision Support August 13, 2014

Bridging the Acute Care Gap: Advancing Acute Care Physical Therapy Education and Educators

Transitioning to a Value-Based Accountable Health System Preparing for the New Business Model. The New Accountable Care Business Model

Collection and Use of Industry and Occupation Data IV: Development of Training Materials to Improve Occupational Data Collection in Cancer Registries

Illinois Early System Overview Online Module Outline

GE Healthcare. Meaningful Use 2014 Prep: Core Part 1. Ramsey Antoun, Training Operations Coordinator December 12, 2013

TRENDS IN CANCER PROGRAMS

Molina Medicare Model of Care

INFORMATION ABOUT THE POSITIONS OPEN FOR NOMINATION

Implementing the Quality Feedback Loop to improve and drive change. An Australian Cardiac Procedures Registry Perspective

Multidisciplinary Cancer Care

Transcription:

Defining Roles within the Cancer Registry Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR Learning Objectives Differentiate program standards from registry standards Recognize the role and purpose of the registry Maximize the value of the registry Adapt to new endeavors

CoC Program Standards vs. Registry Standards Responsibility for Standards Critical to identify registrar s standards Distinguish from standards belonging to others Physicians Administration Other professionals: nurses, social workers Defined coordinators

Identify Registrar s Domain Registrar s domain is the data Specifically data items Standards Choosing which data Collecting data Completeness of data Maintaining data Quality of data items Not the use or analysis of data for patient care & outcomes Standard ER5 Registry Policy & Procedure Identify Registrar s Domain Purpose Structure for creating & maintaining data 1.6 Quality Control Plan Assess data to improve quality 1.11 Registry Education Facilitate accurate data 5.1 Registrar Credentials Educated & knowledgeable about data 5.2 RQRS Participation Submit new and updated data 5.3-5.4 Follow-up Obtain subsequent data 5.5 Data Submission Submit complete data 5.6 Data Accuracy Data meets edits criteria 5.7 Special Studies Submit additional data items

Non Registrar Standards Registrar s Role Share information with leadership based on: Workshops Success stories from other programs Provide advice to leadership as appropriate Q&A from CAnswer Forum Past experience Maintain clear boundaries Seek assistance from CLP, registry advisor, Ca Comm Chair Clarify the CoC expects non-registrars to take the lead Supportive role only Non Registrar Standards Registrar s Role Fulfilling data requests When data is required to accomplish other standards Describe available data and limitations Assist in defining data item request Create data reports For others to analyze Answer data questions: collection, accuracy, completeness Analogy of registrar s role Supportive care only not definitive treatment

Role and Value Role of Registry Comply with state/federal law for reportable cases Comply with registry requirements for CoC standards Maintain database for your facility s cancer cases Utilize database to support facility s cancer program Critical role Unique information only registry can provide Proves value of registry

Value of Registry Data offers snapshot of patient care continuum demographics Demographics include Physicians Treatments Services Other facility involvement Losing cases to other facilities Gaining cases from other facilities Value of Registry Vital information no one else can provide Cuts across multiple admissions Not limited to your facility Accounting of entire patient care continuum Tells the patient s true story

Maximize Value Generate Registry Data Reports Physicians Cross tabulate primary care physicians to surgeons Cross tabulate surgeons to medical & radiation oncologists Identify those not on staff at your facility Cases referred to and referred from Disease sites affected Types of treatment surgery, radiation, systemic Treatment and services Disease sites by surgery, radiation, systemic, combinations Usage of services in user fields (navigation, nutrition, etc)

Provide Meaningful Data to Administration Physicians Look at referral patterns to other physicians Referrals to outside facilities or physicians Cases referred to and referred from Look at totals and patterns of sites, stages, etc Services/treatments your facility can or cannot provide Treatment and services Numbers and types Not appropriateness Adapt to New Endeavors

Measures Review measures with registry staff Communicate rationale Understand importance in patient care Discuss usage to monitor compliance with patient care guidelines Physician input as needed for understanding Ensure data completeness and quality Enter information in timely manner Make full use of the system Concurrent Abstracting Discuss benefits with cancer program leadership Timely information for physicians to assess patient care Timely information for administration to assess facility resources Make plan to implement Does not require additional staff Same work done at different times Resources Journal of Registry Management articles Lectures at past NCRA Annual Educational Conferences

Open Forum Topics Group Discussion Registry standards Role and purpose of registry Maximize value of registry New endeavors Discussion points What are some best practices? What are the challenges? What are steps you may take in the next 6 months?

Thank you Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR AJCC Technical Specialist dgress@facs.org