DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Similar documents
OPNAVINST C N2/N6 31 Mar Subj: UNITED STATES NAVAL COOPERATION AND GUIDANCE FOR SHIPPING

Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND

OPNAVINST N46 21 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVY INSTALLATIONS COMMAND

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

1. Purpose. To implement the guidance set forth in references (a) through (e) by:

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NUCLEAR WEAPON INCIDENT RESPONSE MANAGEMENT

REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY LEVELS FOR NAVY INSTALLATIONS AND ACTIVITIES

OPNAVINST G N514 8 Jan Subj: RELEASE OF INFORMATION ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND ON NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES OF U.S. NAVY FORCES

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 19 Dec Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Subj: SURFACE SHIP AND SUBMARINE SURVIVABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC OPNAVINST DNS-3 11 Aug 2011

OPNAVINST A N Oct 2014

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

OPNAVINST F N09D 2 JUL 2010

Subj: CERTIFICATION OF THE AVIATION CAPABILITY OF SHIPS OPERATING AIRCRAFT

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: THREAT SUPPORT TO THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

Subj: NAVY NUCLEAR COMMAND, CONTROL, AND COMMUNICATIONS EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE

Northern California Area Maritime Security Committee

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

OPNAVINST D N96 23 Jan Subj: SHIP ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE READINESS AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURING PROGRAM

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NUCLEAR WEAPONS RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL READINESS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: NAVY DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES PROGRAM

OPNAVINST B N98 4 Jun 2018

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE NAVAL SAFETY CENTER

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 0HICfOI 1111 CIIIEHII "\\\ \LOI'I RAIIO'I,\ N \\ \ 1'1 'T\C:O'I, \\ASIIIM:TOI\, DC ()

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NUCLEAR WEAPON SYSTEM SAFETY PROGRAM

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY MONITORING OF NAVY TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy

OPNAVINST A N Jan 2015

Subj: EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW, OVERSIGHT, AND VERIFICATION OF MUNITIONS RESPONSES

December 21, 2004 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE NSPD-41 HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE HSPD-13

OPNAVINST D N4 24 May (a) OPNAV M , Naval Ordnance Management Policy Manual

Subj: NAVY ACCELERATED ACQUISITION FOR THE RAPID DEVELOPMENT, DEMONSTRATION, AND FIELDING OF CAPABILITIES

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

1. Purpose. To define and implement a comprehensive approach to the conduct of force structure assessments.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

OPNAVINST G N09P 17 Jul Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION AND SURVEY

Ref: (a) DoD Instruction of 22 November 2011 (b) NTTP 1-15M (c) OPNAVINST H (d) CNO memo 1000 Ser N1/ of 24 Feb 09

UAV s And Homeland Defense Now More Critical Than Ever. LCDR Troy Beshears UAV Platform Manager United States Coast Guard

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COUNTERINTELLIGENCE

Subj: COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE CONDUCT OF NAVAL EXERCISES OR TRAINING AT SEA

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Subj: COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) MONITORING OF NAVY TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS (AIS)

Subj: NAVY HEADQUARTERS CRISIS MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES AND ORGANIZATION. a. The clarification of Navy service watch cell and conditions I and II watch.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

OPNAVINST B DNS 09 Nov Subj: NEW STRATEGIC ARMS REDUCTION TREATY IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLIANCE

OPNAVINST D N1/CNRC 18 Nov 2014

THREAT SUPPORT TO THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM

Subj: RELEASE OF COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY MATERIAL TO U.S. INDUSTRIAL FIRMS UNDER CONTRACT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

Subj: NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY POLICY FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS

NAVY CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PROGRAM AND POLICY

OPNAVINST E N97 7 Nov 2017

OPNAVINST DNS-3 17 Sep Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

Subj: REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY AND PROJECTED OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT STATEMENTS FOR FLEET AIR RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRON SEVEN (VQ-7)

CERTIFICATION OF THE AVIATION CAPABILITY OF SHIPS OPERATING AIRCRAFT

Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, UNITED STATES PACIFIC FLEET

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

Subj: UNITED STATES SHIP CONSTITUTION COMMAND RELATIONSHIPS AND EMPLOYMENT

OPNAVINST B N96 29 Jul 2014

Subj: DEFENSE CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE PERSONNEL SYSTEM (DCIPS)

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTION OF FIELD SUPPORT ACTIVITY, WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

(a) DoD M, Department of Defense Postal Manual, 15 August 2002

OPNAVINST N2/N6 19 Aug 2014

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY. Ref: (a) SECNAV Washington DC Z Jul 2005 (ALNAV 055/05)

OPNAVINST D N09F May 20, Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF NAVAL SAFETY CENTER (NSC)

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

POLICIES CONCERNING THE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

OPNAVINST N Dec Ref: (a) 37 U.S.C. 404 (b) Joint Federal Travel Regulations, Volume 1

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (DON COOP) PROGRAM

4 Aug 92. Encl: From: Commanding Officer, USS MICHIGAN (SSBN 727) To: Director of Naval History (0-09BH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20374

Overview of Physical Security and Protective Measures

SECNAVINST E OUSN 17 May 12 SECNAV INSTRUCTION E. From: Secretary of the Navy

DEPARTMENT OF "rhe NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CYBERSECURITY/INFORMATION ASSURANCE WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT, OVERSIGHT, AND COMPLIANCE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

OPNAVINST B N1/PERS-9 24 Oct 2013

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 375-X-2 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF ASSISTANT DIRECTORS TABLE OF CONTENTS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

Coast Guard Cyber Command. Driving Mission Execution CAPT John Felker Deputy Commander, CGCYBERCOM August 2011

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3380.5A N314 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3380.5A From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: HIGH-VALUE UNIT TRANSIT PROTECTION OPERATIONS Ref: (a) 33 CFR 623 (b) DoD Instruction 2000.12 of 1 March 2012 (c) OPNAVINST F3300.53C (NOTAL) (d) OPNAVINST 5530.14E (e) DoD 5200.08-R, Physical Security Program, April 2007 (f) DoD Instruction 2000.16 of 2 October 2006 (g) NTTP 3-20.6.31M of Nov 2011 (NOTAL) (h) DoD S-5210.41-M-V1 Nuclear Weapon Security Manual, July 2009 (NOTAL) (i) SECNAVINST S8126.1A (NOTAL) (j) OPNAVINST N4740.4B (NOTAL) (k) OPNAVINST N4740.5A (NOTAL) 1. Purpose. To establish Navy policy and responsibilities for managing and executing the protection of high-value units (HVU) during restricted-waters transit. Major changes in this instruction include restricting the definition of HVU to nuclear powered warships and delegating the decision to protect other (non-nuclear powered) ship types to fleet commanders (FLTCDR). This instruction is a complete revision and should be reviewed in its entirety. 2. Cancellation. OPNAVINST 3380.5. 3. Policy. FLTCDRs are responsible for providing protection of and or otherwise mitigating risk to HVU during restricted waters transits. Protection and risk mitigation efforts will be focused on deterring, detecting, preventing and defending against attacks on HVUs while in restricted waters or areas that significantly restrict the maneuverability of the HVU, or when warranted by maritime threat levels. 4. Applicability. This instruction outlines the Navy s HVU transit protection operations policy and supplements guidance

contained in references (a) through (f). Transit protection system operations for ballistic missile submarines fall outside the scope of this instruction and are discussed per references (g) through (i). Protection for unmanned, defueled nuclear powered ships and reactor compartment disposal packages shall be conducted per reference (j). Protection for moored training ships shall be conducted per reference (k). 5. Definitions a. HVU. An HVU is a United States Navy asset whose loss or removal from service would have significant consequences on the Unites States Navy s ability to meet its warfighting requirements. All nuclear powered vessels are designated as HVUs. b. Transit. Transit includes entering or exiting port, canal passage, and passage through areas that significantly restrict the HVU s maneuverability for self-defense. c. Restricted Waters. Restricted waters are those waters that require HVUs to use designated channels or fairways to enter and or exit a port facility. d. Maritime Homeland Security-Operational Planning System (MHS-OPS). MHS-OPS is the Web-based approved scheduling system for all HVU transit escorts in the continental United States (INCONUS). FLTCDRs shall use MHS-OPS to schedule, manage, and capture information related to HVU escorts. 6. Mission. FLTCDRs shall provide armed escorts to HVUs to deter, detect, prevent, and defend against attacks during transit. FLTCDRs shall conduct a local risk assessment that incorporates the local threat assessment, the vulnerability of individual units or commands in the local operating environment, and unit or command criticality based upon individual mission or higher headquarters guidance. If local threat indications and warnings are absent, ambiguous, or unavailable, incorporate most likely and most dangerous threat scenarios into local risk assessment calculus. Additionally, escorts provided by harbor protection units shall be fully reimbursable unless employed within their normal patrol authorities. FLTCDRs may designate additional vessels as HVUs based on the results of area of 2

responsibility (AOR) specific risk assessments that have considered threat, vulnerability and criticality, and apply appropriate protection measures as deemed necessary. a. For HVUs, an escort requires at least two armed escort vessels, or one armed vessel and one appropriately armed aircraft. Within the United States and its territories, HVU transit protection operations can be supported by other U.S. Navy, Department of Defense assets, or other Government agency landside and or waterside assets. These assets may support mitigation strategies required by FLTCDRs in support of HVU transit protection operations. b. The U.S. Coast Guard has overall responsibility for the safety and security of U.S. ports under its ports, waterways, and coastal security mission. The U.S. Coast Guard mitigates terrorism risks (e.g., potential waterborne improvised explosive device attack) throughout the U.S. Maritime Domain by projecting credible deterrence and interdiction capability. The U.S. Coast Guard has implemented substantial measures since 2001 to improve the overall security of the Nation s domestic ports through layered security, improved domain awareness, and cooperative partnerships. The U.S. Coast Guard s port risk mitigation activities may be accounted for in FLTCDR risk assessments when determining the required protective measures for HVU transits in restricted waters. c. When U.S. Coast Guard assets are employed, the U.S. Coast Guard will utilize their Service-specific tactics, techniques, and procedures when conducting this mission. Requests for U.S. Coast Guard HVU escorts shall be submitted via the MHS-OPS collaboration tool, and per local business rules. The use of the MHS-OPS program captures necessary data to facilitate future resourcing and budgeting needs. d. In the United States and its territories, the U.S. Navy is authorized to stop and detain vessels that violate the naval vessel protection zone (NVPZ). However, outside the United States and its territories, the NVPZ does not apply. Therefore, FLTCDRs must assess each country s laws and capabilities, as well as host nation s permissible authorities, when constructing HVU protection requirements. When execution by host nation s 3

forces is not available or inadequate, FLTCDRs shall ensure HVUs are protected by a properly manned, trained, and equipped force that is commensurate with current risk levels. e. Specific HVU transit protection waiver or exception requests shall be submitted to the cognizant Navy component commander (NCC) for review. NCCs may delegate waiver or exception approval authority as appropriate. 7. Responsibilities a. Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Operations, Plans and Strategy (CNO N3/N5) shall review HVU transit protection operations guidance on an annual basis and serve as the primary liaison with U.S. Coast Guard for policies pertaining to the HVU protection mission. b. Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems (CNO N9) shall serve as the resource sponsor for HVU transit protection operations. c. Commander, United States Fleet Forces Command (COMUSFLTFORCOM) shall: (1) In coordination with FLTCDRs, articulate integrated authoritative fleet HVU transit protection warfighting, readiness, and personnel capability requirements to the CNO; and review and comment on HVU joint capabilities integration and development system documents, as applicable. (2) In coordination with FLTCDRs, develop HVU transit protection operations doctrine; concept of operations; and tactics, techniques, and procedures. (3) In coordination with FLTCDRs, establish HVU transit protection training and education requirements. (4) In coordination with FLTCDRs, establish HVU transit protection waiver or exception process. d. FLTCDRs have the responsibility and authority to enforce appropriate security measures to ensure the protection of U.S. Navy elements and personnel under their control. FLTCDRs are supported commanders for all operational matters related to HVU 4

transit protection operations throughout their AOR. This command authority applies to all afloat Navy forces within their operational area, to include units not otherwise in the FLTCDR chain of command. FLTCDRs shall: (1) Conduct mission analysis and operational planning for the execution of HVU transit protection operations. Ensure execution by properly manned, trained, and equipped forces. (2) Execute HVU transit protection operations within their AOR. (3) Establish command and control relationships and command responsibilities for HVU transit protection operations. These procedures shall establish command and control relationships with the local U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port INCONUS or host nation outside the continental United States, to ensure coordination of each HVU transit protection operation. (4) Coordinate with COMUSFLTFORCOM to identify fleet HVU transit protection operations requirements. (5) Coordinate with COMUSFLTFORCOM during development of HVU transit protection operations doctrine; concept of operations; and tactics, techniques, and procedures as directed. (6) Establish and conduct liaison with the appropriate geographic combatant commander to ensure theater requirements are satisfied by FLTCDR HVU transit protection operations guidance. (7) Maintain HVU transit protection records for a minimum of 5 years to properly capture HVU protection data. 8. Records Management. Records created as a result of this instruction, regardless of media and format, shall be managed by Secretary of the Navy Manual 5210.1 of January 2012. Vice Chief of Naval Operations 5

Distribution: Electronic only, via Department of the Navy Issuances Web site http://doni.documentservice.dla.mil/ 6