ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice manaement

Similar documents
ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice management

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services practice management

Policies for TANF Families Served Under the CCDF Child Care Subsidy Program

SEASON FINAL REGISTRATION REPORTS

Building Blocks to Health Workforce Planning: Data Collection and Analysis

Upgrading Voter Registration in Florida

Report to Congressional Defense Committees

National Provider Identifier (NPI)

National Committee for Quality Assurance

BUFFALO S SHIPPING POST Serving Napa Valley Since 1992

Role of State Legislators

Governor s Office of Electronic Health Information (GOEHI) The National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare

Higher Education Employment Report

Practice Advancement Initiative (PAI) Using the ASHP PAI Ambulatory Care Self-Assessment Survey

Advanced Nurse Practitioner Supervision Policy

Patient-Centered Specialty Practice Readiness Assessment

The Association of Community Cancer Centers 2011 Cancer Program Administrator Survey

Poverty and Health. Frank Belmonte, D.O., MPH Vice President Pediatric Population Health and Care Modeling

Counterdrug(CD) Information Brief LTC TACKETT

National Perspective No Wrong Door System. Administration for Community Living Center for Medicare and Medicaid Veterans Health Administration

The 2015 National Workforce Survey Maryland LPN Data June 17, 2016

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Tagalicod, Robert Anthony, and Jessica Kahn HIT Policy Committee January 10, 2012

NCHIP and NICS Act Grants Overview and Current Status

Developmental screening, referral and linkage to services: Lessons from ABCD

National School Safety Conference Reno, Nevada / June 24 29, 2018

Value based care: A system overhaul

NEWS RELEASE. Air Force JROTC Distinguished Unit Award. MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. Unit OK at Union High School, Tulsa OK, has been

Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Program (IAP)

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Readiness Kit

Award Cash Management $ervice (ACM$) National Science Foundation Regional Grants Conference. June 23 24, 2014

Home Health Agency (HHA) Medicare Margins: 2007 to 2011 Issue Brief July 7, 2009

Prescription Monitoring Programs - Legislative Trends and Model Law Revision

How Technology-Based-Startups Support U.S. Economic Growth

Safe Staffing- Safe Work

Medicaid Managed Care 2012 Fiscal Analysts Seminar August 30, 2012

Prescription Monitoring Program:

IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF CARE IN SOUTH CAROLINA S MEDICAID PROGRAM

Care Provider Demographic Information Update

Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:

National Association For Regulatory Administration

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

ACRP AMBASSADOR PROGRAM GUIDELINES

The Value and Use of CME in Medical Licensure

SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION STATUS REPORT NO. 2

2016 Edition. Upper Payment Limits and Medicaid Capitation Rates for Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE )

2017 STSW Survey. Survey invitations were sent to 401 STSW members and conference registrants. 181 social workers responded.

Driving Change with the Health Care Spending Benchmark

RECOUNT RULES & VOTING SYSTEMS

DoD-State Liaison Update NCSL August 2015

The Use of NHSN in HAI Surveillance and Prevention

NCCP. National Continued Competency Program Overview

The Next Wave in Balancing Long- Term Care Services and Supports:

MapInfo Routing J Server. United States Data Information

Department of Homeland Security

The Legacy of Sidney Katz: Setting the Stage for Systematic Research in Long Term Care. Vincent Mor, Ph.D. Brown University

United States Property & Fiscal Officer (USPFO)

A National Role Delineation Study of the Pediatric Emergency Nurse. Executive Summary

College Profiles - Navy/Marine ROTC

2010 Agribusiness Job Report

Episode Payment Models:

The Current State of CMS Payfor-Performance. HFMA FL Annual Spring Conference May 22, 2017

Cesarean Delivery Model Meeting the challenge to reduce rates of Cesarean delivery

State Partnership Performance Measures

2016 STSW Survey. Survey invitations were sent to all STSW members and 2016 conference registrants. 158 social workers responded.

Options Counseling in and NWD/ADRC System National, State & Local Perspectives

Summary of 2010 National Radon Action Month Results

CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION OVERVIEW BY STATE

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS. Panelist: Dr. Donna Peebles Associate Director

Its Effect on Public Entities. Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities

Rebates & Incentives - WTF. Lee Guthman February 28, 2012

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality /Survey & Certification

2014 Giving Report. A Look at Fidelity Charitable Donors and How They Give. REPORT SPOTLIGHT How Donors Approach Philanthropy as a Family

Summary of 2011 National Radon Action Month Results

Doing Business with the Government. Panel Presentation. Facilitated by. Lori Sakalos, CFCM Procurement Analyst Public Buildings Service

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LOCAL PARKS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND

NCQA PCMH Recognition: 2017 Standards Preview. Tricia Barrett Vice President, Product Design and Support January 25, 2017

BEST PRACTICES IN LIFESPAN RESPITE SYSTEMS: LESSONS LEARNED & FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Preventive Controls for Animal Food Inspections and Compliance

State Innovations in Value-Based Care: ACOs and Beyond

Vizient/AACN Nurse Residency Program TM. Jayne Willingham, MN, RN, CPHQ Senior Director Nursing Leadership

131,,000 homeless veterans on any given night 300,000 homeless veterans during the year 23% of the total number of homeless people are veterans

Nursing. Workforce Development. Programs

NSF Award Cash Management $ervice (ACM$) and Financial Update. June 1, 2015

Presented at The Northeast Center to Advance Food Safety (NECAFS) Annual Meeting January 10, 2017 Boston, MA

2012 Federation of State Medical Boards

Patient Centered Medical Home Foundation for Accountable Care

Assuring Better Child Health and Development Initiative (ABCD)

Licensee Requirements

2018 National Health Care Retention & RN Staffing Report

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

FHWA Office of Innovative Program Delivery Mission

Request for Letters of Intent to Apply for 2017 Technology Initiative Grant Funding

FY15 Rural Health Care Services Outreach Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Technical Assistance Webinar for SORHs

Advancing Self-Direction for People with Head Injuries

Federal Highway Administration Future of Highway Funding

Director, Army JROTC Program Overview

Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: 2007 Comparative Database Report

CHIEF NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU INSTRUCTION

Transcription:

payment and practice manaement ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services 2015 Stanley W. Stead, M.D., M.B.A. Sharon K. Merrick, M.S., CCS-P ASA is pleased to present the annual commercial conversion factor survey for 2015. Each summer we anonymously survey anesthesiology practices across the country. We ask them to report up to five of their largest managed care (commercial) contract conversion factors (CF) and the percentage each contract represents of their commercial population, along with some demographic information. Our objectives of the survey are to report to our members the average contractual amounts for the top five contracts and to present a regional survey of trends in commercial contracting. Summary Based on the 2015 ASA commercial conversion factor survey results, the national average commercial conversion factor was $71.92, ranging between $69.64 and $74.29 for the five contracts. The national median was $68.00, ranging between $65.00 and $69.00 for the five contracts (Figure 1, Table 1). In the 2014 survey, the mean conversion factor ranged between $66.98 and $71.79, and the median ranged between $63.88 and $69.00. In contrast, the current national Medicare conversion factor for anesthesia services was $22.4968 (January 1-June 30) and $22.6093 after July 1, 2015, or about 31 percent of the 2015 overall mean commercial conversion factor. Figure 1 shows the frequency in percent and distribution of contract values. The estimated normal distribution is the solid blue line. Also, we are adding a box-and-whiskers plot of the same data immediately below the histogram. The upper and lower whiskers delineate the minimum and maximum values. The box represents the interquartile range, the bottom of the box is the 25th percentile, the horizontal line in the box is the median, and the top of the box is the 75th percentile. The solid diamond in the box is the mean. Stanley W. Stead, M.D., M.B.A. is ASA Vice President for Professional Affairs and Professor of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, Irvine. Sharon K. Merrick, M.S., CCS-P, is ASA Director of Payment and Practice Management. 48 Downloaded From: http://monitor.pubs.asahq.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/asam/934511/ on 05/02/2018

Table 1: National Managed Care Anesthesia Conversion Factors ($/unit), 2015 Conversion Factors Contract 1 Contract 2 Contract 3 Contract 4 Contract 5 ALL Mean $69.64 $71.46 $72.19 $74.29 $73.48 $71.92 Low $41.00 $39.00 $31.00 $40.00 $30.10 $30.10 25th Percentile $60.00 $59.00 $60.00 $60.00 $62.00 $60.00 Median $65.00 $66.76 $68.00 $70.00 $69.00 $68.00 75th Percentile $72.30 $80.00 $82.00 $80.00 $83.00 $78.96 High $195.00 $193.00 $193.00 $193.00 $193.00 $195.00 Number of Responses 194 188 167 139 101 789 Percentage of Managed Care Business 21.0% 12.9% 7.7% 4.9% 4.2% 11.3% Table 1 provides the overall survey results by reported managed care contract. As with previous surveys, we requested that participants submit data on five commercial contracts. Most practices submitted three or more contracts. The survey reflects valid responses from 183 practices in 38 states, a decrease from last year s survey. The 2014 survey results included 190 practices from 41 states. Methodology The survey was disseminated in June 2015. To comply with the principles established by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in their 1996 Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care, the survey requested data from respondents that were at least three months old. In addition, the following three conditions must be met: 1. There are at least five providers reporting data upon which each disseminated statistic is based, and 2. No individual provider s data represents more than 25 percent on a weighted basis of that statistic, and 3. Any information disseminated is sufficiently aggregated such that it would not allow recipients to identify the prices charged or compensation paid by any particular provider. To comply with the statements, we are only able to provide aggregated data. Since some states did not respond, and other states had insufficient response rates, we are unable to provide specific data for all states. We term Eligible States those states that submitted sufficient data to be compliant with DOJ and FTC principles and provided state-specific data for only those states. This is the fifth year we offered the survey electronically through the website www.surveymonkey.com. ASA urged participation through various electronic mail offerings, including ASA committee listserves, ASAP (all-member weekly e-mail digest), Vital Signs and via the ASA website. Continued on page 50 Table 2: Respondent Information by Major Geographic Region, 2015 Region Practices Cases Mean Units/ FTE M.D. Mean Units/ Case FTE M.D. FTE Nurse Anesthetist FTE AA Eastern 52 1,764,993 14,388 10.72 1,646.1 1,233.8 [313.0] 29.0 [12.0] Midwest 44 1,201,340 24,331 10.18 882.4 1,041.6 [95.5] 210.5 [5.0] Southern 45 1,311,246 17,765 10.77 993.6 1,325.0 [336.1] 129.6 Western 42 821,071 9,483 18.69 1,150.0 236.8 [42.0] 124.0 [8.0] ALL 183 5,098,650 16,498 12.42 4,672.0 3,838.1 [786.6] 493.1 [25.0] (Numbers in brackets indicate the number of non-employed FTEs) 49

Continued from page 49 The responses to the survey represented 194 unique practices. However, due to respondents providing incomplete data, we excluded 11 responses for the overall analysis. Our results are based on the data from 183 practices. Results Table 2 (page 49) presents respondent information for the 183 practices in the analytic sample per Major Geographic Region as identified by the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA). These regions are as follows: n Eastern: CT, DE, D.C., ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, NC, PA, RI, VT, VA, WV n Midwestern: IL, IN, IA, MI, MN, NE, ND, OH, SD, WI n Southern: AL, AR, FL, GA, KS, KY, LA, MS, MO, OK, SC, TN, TX n Western: AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY These practices employ or contract with 4,672 full-time equivalents (FTE) physician anesthesiologists, 3,838 FTE nurse anesthetists and 493.1 FTE anesthesiologist assistants (AAs). The practices also work with an additional 786.6 FTE nurse anesthetists and 25 FTE AAs for whom the practice does not directly pay compensation (i.e., facility hires or contracts the nurse anesthetist or AA). The 183 practices reported a total of 789 managed care contracts. Table 3 provides the same respondent information by Minor Geographic Region as identified by MGMA. n CAAKHI: CA, AK, HI n Eastern Midwest: IL, IN, KY, MI, OH n Lower Midwest: AR, KS, LA, MO, OK, TX n Mid Atlantic: D.C., DE, MD, VA, WV n North Atlantic: NJ, MY, PA n Northeast: CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT n Northwest: ID, OR, WA Table 3: Respondent Information by Minor Geographic Region, 2015 Region Practices Cases Units/ FTE M.D. Units/ Case FTE M.D. FTE Nurse Anesthetist FTE AA CAAKHI 13 240,844 7,513 11.5 395.0 24.0 [40.0] 56.0 Eastern Midwest 39 1,142,558 24,913 10.5 891.5 1,048.0 [95.5] 211.5 [5.0] Lower Midwest 13 374,380 13,699 10.1 427.0 620.0 [2.0] 44.0 Mid Atlantic 8 142,614 13,626 9.5 112.9 101.4 [19.0] - North Atlantic 28 1,190,807 14,168 11.1 1,148.2 753.4 [51.0] 7.0 Northeast 10 308,036 12,650 10.4 306.0 360.0 [40.0] 22.0 [12.0] Northwest 12 175,099 9,162 11.1 245.0 119.8 [2.0] 33.0 [8.0] Rocky Mountain 17 405,128 11,533 14.6 510.0 93.0 35.0 Southeast 35 925,904 20,316 11.2 530.6 595.9 [537.1] 84.6 Upper Midwest 8 193,280 14,725 8.4 105.9 122.7 - ALL 183 5,098,650 16,498 12.42 4,672.0 3,838.1 [786.6] 493.1 [25.0] (Numbers in brackets indicate the number of non-employed FTEs) Table 4: Conversion Factor Adjustment Based on Time Units, 2015 Base Units 7.46 Sum of Base and Time Units CF Value Ratio Based for 15-minute Units Minutes/Case 88.71 8-minute time units 11.0888 18.549 1.387 10-minute time units 8.871 16.331 1.221 12-minute time units 7.393 14.853 1.111 15-minute time units 5.914 13.374 1.000 Mean Minutes per Case, Base Unit and Time Unit taken from MGMA DataDive 2014: Cost Survey and Revenue Module for Anesthesia and Pain Management Practices. 50

n Rocky Mountain: AZ, CO, MT, NM, NV, UT, WY n Southeast: AL, FL, GA, MS, NC, SC, TN n Upper Midwest: IA, MN, ND, NE, SD, WI Seven hundred fifty-five (755) of the contracts are based upon a 15-minute unit, 23 upon a 12-minute unit, 10 are based upon a 10-minute unit and one is based upon an eight-minute unit. We normalized all contract conversion factors with eight- 10- and 12-minute time units to the typical 15-minute time unit using an adjustment factor of 1.387 for eightminute units, 1.221 for 10-minute units and 1.111 for 12-minute units (Table 4). Similar to the 2014 survey, the adjustment factors are calculated as ratios based on the average number of time and base units per case. To make these calculations, we used the national medians published in the MGMA Cost Survey for Anesthesia and Pain Management Practices 2014 Data Dive Based on 2013 Data. More groups are reporting that payers have approached them for flat fee contracts for certain procedures. Table 5 shows respondents who identified that they had flat fee contracts. One hundred thirteen of the 183 groups (61.7 percent) negotiated at least one flat fee contract. This is a growth of 10 percent over 2014. 5.52 percent of the respondents have flat fee contracts for labor and delivery. Respondents in the Western region are least likely to have flat fee contracts. Continued on page 52 Table 5: Respondents Having Flat Fee Components, 2015 Flat Fee (Any) Labor & Delivery Cataracts Endoscopy Pain Other Eastern 30 27 1 6 0 0 Midwest 32 27 1 9 3 0 Southern 34 32 0 2 1 0 Western 17 15 1 1 3 1 Total 113 101 3 18 7 1 51

Continued from page 51 Table 6 reports the conversion factor by MGMA Major Region. Contract 1 reflected the highest percentage of the reported commercial business, Contract 2 reflected the second highest percentage, and so on. Thus, when looking at the data, you can see that Contract 1 not only reflects the greatest number of responses (194) but also the highest average percentage of managed care business (21.0 percent). We also reported the number of responses for each contract in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the contract data for each region as a box-and-whiskers plot. We had a sufficient data sample to provide detailed information per MGMA Minor Region (Figure 3, page 51). Table 7 (page 54) shows contract data for the minor regions. This year we are presenting state-specific data for those eligible states (Figure 4, page 53 and Table 8, page 54) whose Table 6: Major Region Managed Care Anesthesia Conversion Factors ($/unit), 2015 Contract 1 Contract 2 Contract 3 Contract 4 Contract 5 ALL Eastern n=56 n=54 n=50 n=40 n=33 n=233 Mean $78.45 $76.37 $78.39 $79.96 $76.63 $77.96 Low $45.00 $46.00 $45.00 $52.00 $30.10 $30.10 25th Percentile $64.00 $62.40 $60.50 $68.50 $66.62 $64.00 Median $72.65 $74.64 $77.70 $74.50 $73.00 $74.11 75th Percentile $84.13 $86.50 $91.00 $88.55 $87.00 $88.00 High $195.00 $120.00 $120.50 $121.89 $142.50 $195.00 Midwest n=48 n=47 n=41 n=34 n=23 n=193 Mean $64.89 $67.41 $65.85 $69.80 $72.55 $67.49 Low $41.00 $40.00 $45.00 $40.00 $46.75 $40.00 25th Percentile $56.83 $56.62 $57.77 $59.00 $56.00 $57.00 Median $62.39 $65.00 $64.67 $65.50 $70.00 $64.67 75th Percentile $69.75 $72.00 $69.00 $74.34 $75.71 $72.00 High $129.00 $144.00 $105.65 $136.00 $144.00 $144.00 Southern n=47 n=44 n=36 n=29 n=23 n=179 Mean $62.23 $68.76 $70.89 $73.81 $67.93 $68.18 Low $44.00 $39.00 $39.00 $52.00 $45.00 $39.00 25th Percentile $57.39 $54.50 $63.00 $63.00 $60.00 $59.00 Median $61.00 $67.20 $70.00 $71.40 $67.00 $67.20 75th Percentile $71.00 $77.63 $79.50 $77.00 $75.00 $75.00 High $82.00 $123.50 $111.27 $139.93 $102.00 $139.93 Western n=43 n=43 n=40 n=36 n=22 n=184 Mean $71.58 $72.49 $72.12 $72.59 $75.52 $72.58 Low $50.00 $40.00 $31.00 $41.00 $53.00 $31.00 25th Percentile $60.00 $59.44 $60.50 $59.25 $63.39 $60.00 Median $65.00 $64.48 $64.00 $68.36 $66.50 $65.00 75th Percentile $72.00 $78.15 $77.45 $75.50 $79.00 $75.00 High $193.00 $193.00 $193.00 $193.00 $193.00 $193.00 52

reporting complied with the DOJ and FTC requirements, listed above. We are hoping that by providing this data, we can encourage more participation in the 2016 CF study. Observations Based on our review of the analysis, the most interesting findings include: n The national average conversion factor increased from a range of $66.98-$71.79 in 2014 to a range of $69.64-$74.29. Also, the median conversion factor range broadened from $63.88-$69.00 in 2014 to $65.00-$69.00. n Conversion factors across the country are similar, with the Eastern Region still having the highest mean of $77.96. n Every region and nearly every contract category had a reported conversion factor high of at least $82.00. The highest conversion factor reported was $195.00. Conclusions This year s survey represents a similar sample size to the 2014 ASA CF Survey. Respondents reported on a broad geographic basis, allowing us to provide detailed regional responses. Some states reported a sufficient number of practices and contracts to allow us to do state reporting. We will continue to monitor the trend in the commercial conversion factor survey results and will launch the survey again in June 2016. It is important that as many practices as possible participate in the 2016 survey to help us obtain an accurate representation of the anesthesia commercial conversion factor. We hope that a significant growth in reporting by state will allow us to publish additional state data. We look forward to your future participation and thank all of the practices that contributed to the 2016 results. Reference: 1. MGMA DataDive Cost and Revenue Module for Anesthesia and Pain Management Practices [database]. Englewood, Colorado: MGMA-Medical Group Management Association; 2014. https://www.mgma.com/login?register=1&returnurl=http://data.mgma.com/datadive/. Accessed August 24, 2015. Continued on page 54 53

Continued from page 53 Table 7: Minor Region Managed Care Anesthesia Conversion Factors ($/unit), 2015 MGMA Minor Region Contracts Low 25th Percentile Median Mean 75th Percentile High CAAKHI 52 $31.00 $54.08 $66.50 $72.31 $81.93 $145.00 Eastern Midwest 171 $40.00 $56.00 $63.00 $64.78 $71.50 $144.00 Lower Midwest 46 $39.00 $52.00 $60.00 $61.78 $71.00 $88.00 Mid Atlantic 40 $42.00 $60.48 $67.00 $64.41 $69.00 $89.10 North Atlantic 123 $33.01 $65.00 $79.00 $81.09 $91.00 $195.00 Northeast 50 $30.10 $70.00 $80.44 $80.98 $87.09 $120.00 Northwest 54 $50.00 $58.50 $63.20 $63.61 $66.52 $95.24 Rocky Mountain 78 $53.73 $63.39 $69.46 $78.97 $80.00 $193.00 Southeast 141 $44.00 $62.00 $70.00 $72.26 $78.50 $139.93 Upper Midwest 34 $59.00 $64.47 $69.50 $79.05 $88.99 $129.00 ALL 789 $30.10 $60.00 $68.00 $71.92 $78.96 $195.00 Table 8: Eligible States Managed Care Anesthesia Conversion Factors ($/unit), 2015 State Contracts Low 25th Percentile Median Mean 75th Percentile High AL 10 $49.50 $57.00 $61.00 $59.80 $62.00 $72.00 CA 48 $46.50 $54.69 $68.00 $74.80 $86.25 $145.00 FL 27 $45.00 $68.00 $72.00 $73.51 $79.00 $119.00 GA 39 $45.00 $65.00 $72.00 $69.95 $75.00 $100.12 IL 31 $50.00 $60.00 $67.00 $74.51 $74.00 $144.00 IN 27 $40.00 $51.00 $59.00 $60.38 $65.00 $106.25 MI 44 $46.00 $52.43 $56.00 $59.11 $60.25 $95.54 NC 20 $58.00 $63.80 $77.15 $78.26 $92.08 $99.00 NJ 25 $53.00 $65.00 $85.00 $86.40 $93.00 $195.00 NY 58 $52.54 $76.00 $86.50 $90.14 $103.00 $144.00 OH 57 $41.00 $63.00 $67.64 $66.60 $72.50 $77.74 PA 40 $33.01 $57.00 $61.00 $64.63 $72.65 $92.00 SC 29 $44.00 $62.00 $71.25 $77.43 $91.00 $139.93 TN 16 $45.00 $60.00 $69.00 $66.70 $70.70 $92.00 TX 26 $39.00 $60.00 $68.50 $66.81 $80.00 $88.00 UT 39 $56.00 $63.39 $65.00 $68.74 $72.69 $88.50 WA 49 $50.00 $57.50 $63.25 $63.79 $66.52 $95.24 54