Complaints Investigation and Review. Dr. Ademola Daramola International Relations Specialist Drugs US FDA India Office New Delhi February 22nd 2018

Similar documents
CBI s 14 th ANNUAL PRODUCT COMPLAINTS CONGRESS FOR LIFE SCIENCES June 14, 2016

SJN DO CB Field Alert Reports. Edwin Ramos Director of Compliance Food and Drug Administration San Juan District Office

Complaint Handling and Medical Device Reporting (MDRs)

Determining and Reporting Adverse Events vs. Product Complaints

Connie Hoy October 2013

Compounded Sterile Preparations Pharmacy Content Outline May 2018

FDA s Office of Regulatory Affairs: Violation Trends & Medical Device Update

Post Market Surveillance Requirements. SAMED Regulatory Conference 2 December 2015

Carrying Out a State Regulatory Program

STATEMENT. JEFFREY SHUREN, M.D., J.D. Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health Food and Drug Administration

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research - Compliance Central with FDA Center Compliance Directors: Part 1

LCDR Kemi Asante, PharmD, RAC Health Science Policy Analyst Office of Prescription Drug Promotion CDER FDA

Bristol Myers Squibb Holdings Pharma., Ltd.

The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 Section-by-Section Summary

BE-595M Homework Assignment Due: 3/3/08

Postmarketing Drug Safety and Inspection Readiness

Clinical. Medication Errors and Medicine Defect Reporting SOP. Document Control Summary. Contents

Modernizing Hospital Adverse Event Reporting

Draft 11/3/2017. Crosswalk - Requirements for Foodborne Illness Training Programs Based on Standard 5

Crosswalk - Requirements for Foodborne Illness Training Programs Based on Standard 5

FSMA User Guide. Food Safety Modernization Act Guide

SECTION HOSPITALS: OTHER HEALTH FACILITIES

FDA's OMB supporting document for QSr recordkeeping, 7/20/01, page 1 of 7

Introduction to Post-marketing Drug Safety Surveillance: Pharmacovigilance in FDA/CDER

Regulatory,Quality & Emergency Preparedness. MaryBeth Parache Director, Quality Affairs New York Blood Center

AMENDED WARNING LETTER CIN

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REPORTING UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS INCLUDING ADVERSE EVENTS

Changing Requirements for Devices//Device Constituent Parts in Combination Products

POCKET GUIDE TO THE ACCREDITATION STANDARDS (ISO 15189:2014)

Medical Device Reporting. FD&C Act CFR Direct Final Rule 2/28/05. As amended by:

WIRBinar. How to Survive an FDA Inspection. Upcoming Trainings: Contact Us: (360)

Re: Docket No. FDA 2013-N-0500 Proposed Rule: Supplemental Applications Proposing Labeling Changes for Approved Drugs and Biological Products

NEW BRIGHTON CARE CENTER

Guidance for Industry ANDA Submissions Prior Approval Supplements Under GDUFA

Authorized Personnel to Review

FINAL DOCUMENT. Global Harmonization Task Force

Medical Device Reporting for Manufacturers

Family Child Care Licensing Manual (November 2016)

MEDMARX ADVERSE DRUG EVENT REPORTING

Administrative Policies and Procedures. Policy No.: N/A Title: Medical Equipment Management Plan

WARNING LETTER CERTIFIED MAIL -~ Q December 14, 2005

POLICY OFFICE OF PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

247 CMR: BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY 247 CMR 21.00: REGISTRATION OF OUTSOURCING FACILITIES. Section

National Policy Library Document

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

STANDARDS Point-of-Care Testing

Safety in the Pharmacy

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE Office of Research Integrity & Outreach

Update on FDA-EMA QbD Pilot

Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) Enforcement Practices

THE BOARD OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC COMMISSION RESOLUTION. dated December 22, 2015 N 174

AATB s Report: Adverse Reporting Systems & Requirements

Objective Competency Competency Measure To Do List

Remediation, Resolution and Outcomes

PLAN OF ACTION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF 510(K) AND SCIENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

Revised! Regulatory Compliance for the Personal Care Products Industry: EU/US/States

Health Information Privacy Policies and Procedures

To provide information about the role of the pharmacy in Infection Prevention and Control.

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

E.H.R. s and Improving Patient Safety - What Has Been the Real Impact?

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

This course presents the applications of sterile processing theory in the clinical setting.

Guidance for Industry

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE BOARD OF PHARMACY CHAPTER STERILE PRODUCT PREPARATION IN PHARMACY PRACTICE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pediatric Medical Devices: The FDA Postmarket Perspective

The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Unlicensed Medicines Policy

Injury and Work-Related Illness Prevention Program

JOINT INSPECTOR GENERAL ASSISTANCE GUIDE

CENTRAL SERVICE (CS) TECHNICIANS PERFORM MANY IMPORTANT

HIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies

NEW JERSEY. Downloaded January 2011

Medical Devices and Device-Led Combination Products; Voluntary Malfunction Summary

MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR REACH AND CLP INSPECTIONS 1

Balance Fitness and Nutrition

Guide to Incident Reporting for General Medical Devices and Active Implantable Medical Devices

Personal Protective Equipment Program. Risk Management Services

SANTA RITA CARE CENTER Notice of Information Practices

Chapter 48 - Bioresearch Monitoring

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration s Food Safety Modernization Act: Current & Future Requirements

PATIENT INFORMATION. In Case of Emergency Notification

Incident Management Procedure

INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PLAN (IIPP) October 2015

May 12, 2016 MEMORANDUM. Certain provisions of FSMA are already in effect, namely: Mandatory recall authority (FSMA 206).

Audits, Administrative Reviews, & Serious Deficiencies

i. Identifying work areas, processes or tasks that require workers to wear respirators, and evaluating hazards.

ACCREDITATION OPERATING PROCEDURES

JCI Overview Summary Update. Patcharin Boonyarungsun, Ph.D Director of Total Quality and Cost Improvement, Bangkok Hospital Head Quarter

MEDICINES FOR HUMAN USE (CLINICAL TRIALS) REGULATIONS Memorandum of understanding between MHRA, COREC and GTAC

Presentation to the Helicopter Offshore Safety Inquiry

APEx ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES. April 2017 TARGETING CANCER CARE. ASTRO APEx ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES

CHEMICAL HYGIENE PLAN

2015 Annual FDA Medical Device Quality System Data. Inspections, FDA Form 483 Observations, and Warning Letter Citations

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

MDUFA Performance Goals and Procedures Process Improvements Pre-Submissions Submission Acceptance Criteria Interactive Review

:,-, WARNING LETTER. Mr. Jean Claude Mas Chief Executive Officer Poly Implants Protheses, Sa 337 Avenue De Bruxelles La Seyne, Sur Mer France

University of Chattanooga Respiratory Protection Program. Areas Affected: Employees whose duties require the use of a respirator

Helping physicians care for patients Aider les médecins à prendre soin des patients

Specific Comments on Proposed Amendments

Transcription:

Complaints Investigation and Review Dr. Ademola Daramola International Relations Specialist Drugs US FDA India Office New Delhi February 22nd 2018

Information presented in this presentation does not represent the views of US FDA

AGENDA How To Proceed Essential Parameters FDA consumer complaints FDA regulatory requirements FDA complaint handling essential parameters Complaints, adverse events and field alert report (FAR) requirements FDA s focus during investigations

Consumer Complaints A consumer complaint is notification that a product in commercial distribution: May be in violation of the laws or regulations administered by the FDA May have caused an illness, injury, or death. Is alleged to have caused problems not covered by the above

Sources of Complaints Complaints may be received from - consumers - other government agencies - trade sources - or health care professionals - anonymous sources, etc

FDA s Minimum Regulatory Requirements 21 CFR 211.198 Written procedures SOP established & followed -Review by a Quality Control Unit -Evaluation of possible failure to meet specifications Determination of need for an investigation -Whether complaint represents a serious and unexpected adverse drug experience that needs to be reported to FDA Conducting an investigation to determine root cause Corrective and Preventive Action

FDA s Minimum Regulatory Requirements 21 CFR 211.198 Complaint Files - Maintained at establishment or another facility - Readily available for inspection Must be kept for at least 1 year after product expiration or 1 year after complaint was received whichever is longer Must Include where known - Name and strength of product - Lot number - Complainant information - Nature of complaint - Reply to complainant

FDA s Minimum Regulatory Requirements [211.198(b)(2)]: Where an investigation is conducted The written records must include: - Findings of the investigation - Follow-up to the investigation [211.198(b)(3)]: Where an investigation is not conducted The written record shall include - The reason that an investigation was found not to be necessary - The name of the responsible person making such a determination

FDA s Minimum Regulatory Requirements Firm must: Have a designated complaint unit / dedicated personnel Have detailed SOP regarding handling of complaints that prioritizes complaints that may be ADE reportable Ensure all relevant information is collected and kept in file Have a procedure to make sure all possible sources of complaints are reviewed Segregate and maintain separate complaint files designated as such and have personnel dedicated to maintain files

FDA s Minimum Regulatory Requirements Complaint Handling SOP should address: - Initial determination of complaint type - Handling of complaints that represent potentially significant safety concerns - Field alert report, product correction or ADE - Notification to Quality Personnel/Committee - Referral for Investigation evaluation of retain samples - Follow up with complainant - Close out of complaint file

FDA s Minimum Regulatory Requirements Product Recall SOP should address: - Process for review and evaluation of priority complaints - Responsibility for recall determination - Medical assessment of potential patient risk - Depth of recall - FDA reporting - Handling of recall - Termination of recall - Recall Effectiveness Checks

FDA s Minimum Regulatory Requirements Firm must: Conduct training/retraining of personnel on an annual basis, to ensure compliance with requirement to report complaints Have a detailed, but easy to use, complaint intake form that includes all required information so follow-up reduced Review status of complaints/investigations on a routine basis to ensure timelines are met

Field Alert Reports (FAR) Mandatory Postmarketing reporting program 21 CFR 314.81(b)(1)(i) and (ii) - NDA applications 21 CFR 314.98(c) - ANDA applications Effective on May 23, 1985 Intended to establish effective system for FDA s surveillance of marketed drug

21 CFR 314.81 (b) (1)(i) Required Reporting Any incident that causes the drug product or its labeling to be mistaken for, or applied to, another article Bacterial Contamination Significant chemical, physical or other change Product deterioration Failure of one or more distributed batches of drug products to meet the specification established in the application

NDA/ANDA Field Alert Reports Requirements: Report to local FDA District Office Within 3 working days of receipt of information Can be telephoned in / but must be followed up by written report Report/Mailing Cover Must Specify NDA-Field Alert Report Form FDA 3331 or 3331a (Automated)

Foreign NDA/ANDA Holders Required to submit certain information about distributed drug products to the jurisdictional FDA district offices US Office/Agent (21 CFR 314.50(a)(5)) is responsible for reporting to the FDA District Office where registered/located Report within 3 WORKING DAYS of receipt

NDA/ANDA Field Alert Reports What should be included: Brief description of information received Brief description of any preliminary investigation Evaluation, if any, of possible corrective/preventative action Timetable for investigation/communicating additional information to FDA Contact person/contact information For FARs that affect more than one product, submit one FAR per NDA/ANDA Multiple lots of the same product may be submitted on one form.

Evaluation of Complaints Adverse Event? - Serious? Unexpected? - Reportable Adverse Event? Need to file an NDA field alert? - Failure to meet specifications chemical, physical? - Mislabeling? Need for a recall?

When to Report FAR to FDA FAR not required If root cause determined and found to not be related to drug product quality within 3 working days e.g. Analytical lab error FAR required Further investigation required Root cause not determined Corrective action initiated i.e. Formulation revision, labeling change

Three Working Days Starts when the applicant becomes aware of the reported problem Complaint Internal testing DOES NOT begin the day the applicant confirms or invalidates a problem

When to Report Recalls to FDA Recalls: Most are voluntary actions FDA has limited authority to order recalls for drugs For devices, FDA has authority to order recalls (21 C.F.R. 810) No legal requirement to notify FDA of voluntary recall of drugs In most cases, market withdrawals being an exception advising FDA of a recall is advisable Do not need to await FDA input to commence recall FDA will categorize level of recall I, II or III after recall notice submitted

When to Report Recalls to FDA When in doubt report There is little downside to reporting

FDA s Expectations During Investigations Are complaint procedures in place? Are they followed? - Do they include oral complaints? Is there a formally designated unit to review complaints? Are there formally designated complaint files? Are complaints evaluated for need to report as an ADE? Were complaints reviewed to determine if an investigation was necessary? Were efforts to obtain information from complainants performed/documented?

FDA s Expectations During Investigations If no investigation was conducted, was the rationale for not conducting an investigation documented? Does the complaint file include all records relating to the investigation of the complaint? - Was a root cause identified? - Were the complaint investigations concluded? Were complaints reviewed in a timely manner? Was need for corrective action evaluated? Was trend analysis conducted?

FDA s Expectations During Investigations NDA/ANDA Field Alerts Were complaints evaluated for the need to file a Field Alert report? Were Field Alert reports filed on a timely basis? Did your Company keep FDA informed as to the investigation into the complaint that led to the Field Alert report and was the investigation/action adequate? Was Management made aware of Field Alerts? Were Field Alerts closed?

Warning Letter Your firm failed to establish and follow adequate written procedures describing the handling of all written and oral complaints regarding a drug product, including provisions for review by the quality control unit of any complaint involving the possible failure of a drug product to meet any of its specifications and, for such drug products, a determination as to the need for an investigation in accordance with 21 CFR 211.192 (21 CFR 211.198). From January 2012 to August 2016, your firm received numerous (approximately 1,500) consumer complaints related to leaking, empty, and under-filled sterile (b)(4) solution (b)(4)% bottles. Your firm s investigation indicates this persistent critical quality defect is due to a filling machine issue in which the (b)(4) is improperly placed into the bottle (b)(4). Because of this recurring malfunction, operators frequently perform aseptic interventions at the insertion station when they detect stuck (b)(4) defects. These defects are not easily detected, and the line has produced finished, capped units with nonintegral container-closures. In addition, in some cases, (b)(4) cracks do not immediately occur in finished units, but instead develop days later. Specifically, your investigation states, it is evident that a wrong placement of the (b)(4) on the bottle on the filling machines must be resulting in a damaged or cracked (b)(4) which does not occur immediately and occurs on standing for a few days. Because of the location and delayed timing of these defects, they are not readily detectable by final manual or automated inspections

References Compliance Program Guidance Manual. Drug Quality Reporting System (DQRS) (MedWatch Reports); NDA Field Alert Reports (FARs) https:///downloads/drugs/guidancecompliancereg ulatoryinformation/ucm282847.pdf Jenny Qin. (2012). NDA Field Alert Reporting system US FDA Inspections Operation Manual. Chapter 7. (2018) https:///iceci/inspections/iom/default.htm Peter Reichertz. (2016). Update on FDA guidance and regulations for the complaint handling process and on FDA Field Alert Reports

Questions may be sent to US-FDA-INO@fda.hhs.gov