Standard 3.3: Survivorship Care Plan

Similar documents
Survivorship Care: Building a Program

1/25/15. Equicare Health. Patient Management & Retention: Clinical And Financial Implications. Clinical Implica+ons of Pa+ent Management

Oncology Data Management Systems

11/2/ Community Oncology Alliance 1 NEW PROJECTS & MODELS. Panel Moderator: Laura Long, MD President, The Long View, PC

Na#onal Pa#ent Safety Goals

Data Collec*on and Measurement in Quality Improvement

Five Core Components for a Hospital-based Injury Preven:on Program

The software that powers HOME HEALTH. THERAPY. PRIVATE DUTY. HOSPICE

Grant Applica,on Form

Leveraging Meaningful Use to Assist in Reducing Hospital Readmissions

Domain 1 Patient Engagement

Ar#cle 517 in the 2011 and 2014 Na#onal Electrical Code (NEC)

DRAFT Optimal Care Pathway

Basic Overview of Funding Opportuni6es at the Ins6tute of Educa6on Sciences

Second Chance Act Grants: Guidance for Smart Proba7on Applicants

Doing Good. Neighborhood

Popula'on Health, Public Health, & Meaningful Use

Models for Patient-centered Cancer Care

Coordina(ng Care to Improve Outcomes & Reduce Costs

Global Health Assessment Strategies. Ricardo Izurieta

Qatar Mental Health Law. Dr. Suhaila Ghuloum, FRCPsych

Ensuring Healthcare Worker Safety When Handling Hazardous Drugs: The Joint Position Statement From the Oncology Nursing Society, the American

Nancy Hailpern, Director, Regulatory Affairs K Street, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20005

Advancing Popula/on Health and Consumerism

Discussion Panel: Engaging Family Caregivers in Educa3on & Advocacy.

The Portuguese health system: challenges and opportunities. Pedro Pita Barros

Management Systems for Healthcare Environmental, Health and Safety

Providing Safe and Appropriate Mode of Delivery: Decreasing Unnecessary Cesarean Sec:ons in Brazil

Kinnser is software for better post-acute care.

Regulatory Basics Ins2tu2onal Review Board Research Requirements & Common Audit Findings

Strengths of the Nursing Workforce and Challenges Nurses and the Health Organiza9ons that Employ them will Face Over the Next 10 Years

Patient identifier/label: Page 1 of 6 PATIENT AGREEMENT TO SYSTEMIC THERAPY: CONSENT FORM TRASTUZUMAB (HERCEPTIN) Patient s first names.

Introducing Sarah Bodor

Deborah Mayer, PhD, RN, AOCN, FAAN School of Nursing Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

Rural Health and The Pa/ent Centered Medical Home. The Compliance Team Dianne Bourque, RN, CNOR, CASC Accredita/on Advisor

MASH Implementa.on 2016 Traffic Safety Conference June 7, 2016 College Sta.on, TX. Dick Albin FHWA Resource Center

Medicare Wellness What is it, and how can I u1lize this in my prac1ce? Rural Health Clinic Conference Jackson, MS

Past Decade: DNP Movement

Strategy for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage March 2015

St Monica s Specialist Breast Care Centre. Ethna Hickey- CNM2 Emma Holland- Specialist Breast Care Nurse Claire O Donnell-CNM1

Dr. Fernando Otaíza O Ryan MD, MSc Chief of the NIPC Programme, Ministry of Health Chile

ASCO s Payment Reform Model

Radiation Oncology. This guide was prepared by the nursing staff of the JGH and the volunteers of Hope & Cope.

Determining)and)Addressing)Adherence)to)the)NCCN)Guidelines)for)Chronic)Phase)CML!

3/25/13. Objec+ve Four. Review of Literature. Project Health Link: HRSA Nursing Educa+on, Prac+ce and Reten+on (NEPR) ini+a+ve:

Na8onal Clinical Lead, Mental Health Intelligence Network Dr. Geraldine Sept 23 Bristol 14:30-15:10

! 1. Goals and Objectives. Assessment of Need. Primary Audience of the Intervention. Direct Beneficiaries of The Program

The DSRIP Report Richard Bernstock Dennis Maquiling Albert Alvarez Peggy Chan

Clinical Programs. Purpose and Structure. October 7, 2014

Specialty Practice in a Value Based Payment World. Sandra J Lewis MD FACC FAHA June 22, 2017

TRENDS IN CANCER PROGRAMS

Welcome! PCORI s Application Submission Process. James Hulbert, Assistant Director, Policy and Planning. James Hulbert

Implementa*on of a Con*nued Professional Cer*fica*on Program (CPC) for Nurse Anesthe*sts

QOPI CERTIFICATION PROGRAM STANDARDS

Monitoring & Evalua/on. Ari Probandari

Suppor&ng Worksite Lacta&on

Check list and CVC Dr ROSAY Unité d accès vasculaire DAR CLB Lyon

Patient Navigation Programs Leveraging Care Pathways. Tina Evans, RN, BS Director of Nursing,Onco-Nav

Addressing Challenges In Pa0ent Safety: Implemen0ng Systems- Based Approaches James P. Bagian, MD, PE

The Challenge of Academic Tech Transfer Today and Tomorrow

Developing New Models: Integra5ng House Calls and Team- Based Care Into Primary Care

Patient Navigation & Satisfaction

Safety Policies of Peer-Reviewed Journals. Lauren Grabowski, Sco< R. Goode

PLAN FEATURES PREFERRED CARE

Administrators. Medical Directors. 61% The negative impact on our hospital-based program s. 44% We will need to consider the most appropriate or most

ACRIN ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING MANUAL. 1 March 2006 v.3

HAI definitions: Ventilator-associated Events. Michael Bell, M.D. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

TRAINING WORKSHOP Effec3ve proposal prepara3on for European Research Fellowship. Khon Kaen University, 28/05/2018

Payer s Perspective on Clinical Pathways and Value-based Care

Prac%ce Management. Peter Bidey, D.O. February 20, 2016 Instructor, Family Medicine Medical Director, Family PCOM PCOM

!"#$%&%$'#()#*$+&*$!*,-#.$/01#..#(1#! !"#$%&! !"! !"!

1/17/18. CMS Quality Measure Repor6ng Update. ASCQR Program Measures Summary

SERVICES COVERAGE LIMITS/ EXCLUSIONS Alcohol, Drug, and Substance Abuse Services

ONCOLOGY NURSING SOCIETY RESEARCH AGENDA. Prepared and Submitted by. Ann M. Berger, PhD, APRN, AOCN, FAAN ONS Research Agenda Team Leader

WELCOME Thank you for joining us for today s webinar Healthcare FGI Primer Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Updated: 10/01/12 Page : 1

Project BOOST Be'er Outcomes by Op2mizing Safe Transi2ons

PREFERRED CARE. combination of family members; however no single individual within the family will be subject to more than the individual

MIPS/APM Proposed Rule Summary On Monday, May 9, 2016 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published in the Federal Register the

4/2/15. Re)na 2015 and Beyond Keys to Management Success. Financial Disclosures. Top Prac)ce Management Challenges

Advance Care Planning an introduc3on to the Brighton & Hove toolkit

he U.S. Environmental Protec4on Agency Brownfields Assessment and Cleanup Grant Guidelines A Detailed Review of Developing your Proposal Package

HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT (HSA)

Inventory of Biological Specimens, Registries, and Health Data and Databases REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE

Optional PREFERRED CARE. Covered 100%; deductible waived. Covered 100%; deductible waived 30% after deductible

Special Measures Quality Improvement Plan Update. Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Founda=on Trust. 10 March 2016 KEY. Delivered. On Track to deliver

The Cancer Survivorship Initiative

Parole Decision Making in Montana

EONS Clinical travel Grant 2016 report from Charlotte Weston, Breast Clinical Nurse Specialist, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Healthcare Reform. Ara Darzi FRS

Optional PREFERRED CARE. Covered 100%; deductible waived. Covered 100%; deductible waived

Implementa)on of Laboratory Quality Management Systems

Telemedicine: The Basics And Answers to Ques6ons You Always Had But Never Asked

Supporting Sexual Health and Intimacy. A Pocket Reference Guide

Request for Proposals

The FOCUS Program: Helping Cancer Patients and Family Their Caregivers. Laurel Northouse PhD, RN, FAAN Professor of Nursing University of Michigan

Learn and Earn With ONS Nursing Education. ILNA Points REFERENCE GUIDE. Resources for BMTCN Renewal.

1. General description

STRATEGIES TO REDUCE READMISSIONS

Attending Physician Statement- Chronic lung disease or End stage lung disease

Transcription:

: Care Plan In 2012 the Commission on Cancer introduced new Standards for Cancer Program Accredita:on. They created a new chapter of standards en:tled: CONTINUUM OF CARE SERVICES 1

Included in this sec:on were new requirements for: Pa:ent Naviga:on Process Psychosocial Distress Screening Care Plan 2

implement a process to disseminate a comprehensive care summary and followup plan to patients who are completing cancer treatment. The process is monitored, evaluated, and presented at least annually to the cancer committee and documented in minutes. 3

Programs were given 3 years to develop processes to sa>sfy these standards. The effec:ve date for implementa:on was January 2015. 4

In August 2013, the Commission on Cancer performed a needs assessment of its 1500 accredited cancer programs. 5

Storms on the horizon 6

Problems with preparedness: Programs Experience: plans in place 21% 7

Problems with preparedness: Programs Experience: plans in place 21% Completely Confident of compliance - 37% 8

Problems with preparedness: Programs Experience: plans in place 21% Completely Confident of compliance - 37% Addressing the Standard 40% 9

Problems with preparedness: Programs Experience: plans in place 21% Completely Confident of compliance - 37% Addressing the Standard 40% Had not addressed the Standard - 60% 10

Problems with preparedness: Need for Defini>ons 11

Problems with preparedness: Need for Defini>ons How to evaluate the process? 12

Problems with preparedness: Need for Defini>ons How to evaluate the process? What tools were available? 13

Problems with preparedness: Need for Defini>ons How to evaluate the process? What tools were available? What is required for successful implementa>on? 14

Problems with preparedness: Need for Defini>ons How to evaluate the process? What tools were available? What is required for successful implementa>on? Are there organiza>ons to turn to for help? 15

CoC Releases 3.3 Defini>ons! Revises Timeline for Implementa>on! 16

Defini:ons Who is a survivor? IOM: Anyone with cancer from diagnosis to death The defini>on of "survivor" in the Ins>tute of Medicine (IOM) Report, From Cancer Pa,ent to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transi,on, states that "an individual is considered a cancer survivor from the,me of cancer diagnosis through the balance of his or her life, according to the Na,onal Coali,on for Cancer and the NCI Office of Cancer ". 17

Defini:ons Who is a survivor? IOM: Anyone with cancer from diagnosis to death CoC: Pa>ent treated with cura:ve intent* who has completed therapy** * Effec>vely all stage I- III cases for all disease sites ** Excluding long term hormonal therapy (breast, prostate) 18

Minimal Content for the Treatment Summary Based on a data set formulated by ASCO and expected to be released soon. 19

Minimal Content for the Treatment Summary 1) Surgery : yes/no if yes: a) procedure with loca>on in body b) date by year, month op>onal 20

Minimal Content for the Treatment Summary 2) Chemotherapy: yes/no if yes: a) name of systemic agents* b) end date by year, month op>onal *agents only, NOT regimen 21

Minimal Content for the Treatment Summary 3) Radia>on therapy : yes/no if yes: a) anatomic area treated b) date by year, month op>onal 22

Minimal Content for the Treatment Summary 4) Ongoing toxicity or side effects of all therapy PRESENT AT COMPLETION of therapy Informa>on on its likely course 23

Minimal Content for the Treatment Summary 5) For selected cancers, informa>on regarding: Predisposing condi>ons Gene>c/hereditary factors Results of gene>c tests if available 24

Follow Up Care Plan 1. Oncology Care Team Contact Numbers and Loca>on 25

Follow Up Care Plan 2. Ongoing Adjuvant Therapy Name of drug (s) Planned Dura>on of Therapy Expected Side Effects 26

Follow Up Care Plan 3. Schedule of Follow Up - Table Format Who? How Ojen? Where? 27

Follow Up Care Plan 4. Cancer Surveillance Tests- Table Format Who is responsible for ordering it? How Ojen it will be done? Where it will be done? 28

Follow Up Care Plan 5. Cancer Screening for early detec>on of new primaries** - Table Format Who is responsible for ordering it? How ojen it will be done? Where it will be done? ** Only if different from general popula>on 29

Follow Up Care Plan 6. Other periodic tes>ng: suggested phrase "con>nue all standard non- cancer related health care with your primary care provider, with the following excep>ons: [if there are any]" 30

Follow Up Care Plan 7. Possible Symptoms of Recurrence "Any new, unusual and/or persistent symptoms should be brought to the amen>on of your provider." 31

A list of likely or rare late term side effects that the survivor might experience based on his/ her diagnosis and treatment and the likely symptoms indica>ve of that side effect. 32

A list of items (e.g. emo>onal or mental health, paren>ng, work/employment, financial issues, and insurance) should be covered with standard language sta>ng that survivors have experienced issues in these areas and that the pa>ent should speak with his or her oncologist and/or PCP if having related concerns. 33

A general statement emphasizing the importance of healthy diet, exercise, smoking cessa>on and alcohol use reduc>on may be included. Statements may be tailored if par>cularly per>nent to the individual. 34

The cancer commimee will develop a policy of iden>fying a physician team member or advanced prac>ce partner who would be responsible for discussing the care plan with a pa>ent and track compliance annually. 35

Informa>on Sources American Society of Clinical Oncology Na>onal Coali>on for Cancer Livestrong Founda>on EHR providers 36

Timeline for Implementation January 1, 2015 10% January 1, 2016 25% January 1, 2017 50% January 1, 2018 75% January 1, 2019 100% At Survey 2015, 2016, or 2017, Programs at 100% receive Special Recognition 37

Washington State Legislative Issues An Update on Hazardous Drugs 38

The 2011 Legislature passed Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill (ESSB) 5594, requiring the Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) to set requirements to protect workers who handle chemotherapy and other hazardous drugs.

Initial Implementation Schedule Jan 1, 2014 Stage 1: Complete and implement a written hazardous drugs control program. July 1, 2014 Stage 2: Implement employee training. Jan 1, 2015 Stage 3: Install appropriate ventilated cabinets. 40

The rule applies to all employers in health care facilities that have employees with occupational exposure to hazardous drugs. For the purpose of this rule, health care facilities are defined as places where a health care provider provides health care to patients, including: Hospitals. Clinics. Nursing homes. Laboratories. Offices. Veterinary medicine clinics. Retail pharmacies. Home health care agencies. Research laboratories where a health care provider offers health care to patients. 41

Drugs Covered by USP 797 (now USP 800) include: Antineoplastics Hormones Antipsychotics Anti-epileptics 42

The inclusion of other classes of drugs has created a situation which has the potential to impact: 1) drug access for women for birth control and reproductive issues 2) labor and delivery 3) availability of mental health services 4) Patients with seizure disorders 43

February 10, 2014 Employer members of the Hazardous Drug Advisory Committee submitted a letter requesting a delay in implementation to allow for refining of the rules. 44

45

May 2014 Labor and Industries accepted the request to revisit the rules. The Advisory Committee cancelled further work on Best Practices Stakeholder meetings were planned One stakeholder meeting was held. 46

September 2014 Labor and Industries published new guidelines without further discussion with the Advisory Committee 47

After having granted the initial request to revise the rules, L & I may have violated the rules that govern Administrative Practices by reversing itself and then proceeding before Best Practices could be developed and by not allowing sufficient time for oncology practices to create their hazardous drug assessments and control manuals to satisfy the final rules. 48

What Happens Next? Discussions with all affected organizations Discussions with labor and Industries Meetings with Legislators 49