Human Samples in Research

Similar documents
Procedure For Training In Use Of Human Tissue Obtained For Research Purposes

Guidance for MRC units on HTA licence applications for storage of human samples for research purposes

Policy for the Reporting and Management of Incidents Including Serious Incidents. Version Number: 006

MANAGEMENT OF PROTOCOL AND GCP DEVIATIONS AND VIOLATIONS

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

ABMU R&D Operational Framework

SOP-QA-28 V2. Approver: Prof Maggie Cruickshank, R&D Director Approver: Prof Steve Heys, Head of School

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 715. Principles of Clinical Research Laboratory Practice

Corporate. Research Governance Policy. Document Control Summary

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Version Number: 003. On: September 2017 Review Date: September 2020 Distribution: Essential Reading for: Information for: Page 1 of 13

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Reporting Serious Breaches in Clinical Research

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 710. Good Clinical Practice AUDIT AND INSPECTION. NNUH UEA Joint Research Office. Acting Research Services Manager

Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance

Research Governance Framework 2 nd Edition, Medicine for Human Use (Clinical Trial) Regulations 2004

Quality Assurance in Clinical Research at RM/ICR. GCP Compliance Team, Clinical R&D

ACTIONS/PSOP/001 Version 1.0 Page 2 of 6

POLICY FOR INCIDENT AND SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTING

COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK

Safety Reporting in Clinical Research Policy Final Version 4.0

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Trial Management: Trial Master Files and Investigator Site Files

Version Number: 004 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

MHRA Findings Dissemination Joint Office Launch Jan Presented by: Carolyn Maloney UHL R&D Manager

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Unit 2 Clinical Governance & Risk Management Awareness

Research Adverse Event and Safety Reporting Procedures Outcome Statement: Title:

Document Title: Site Selection and Initiation for RFL Sponsored Studies Document Number: 026

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

Standard Operating Procedure

GCP INSPECTION CHECKLIST

SOP18b: Standard Operating Procedure for Preparing for External Audit and Inspection

Document Title: Document Number:

Sample Privacy Impact Assessment Report Project: Outsourcing clinical audit to an external company in St. Anywhere s hospital

IDENTIFYING, RECORDING AND REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS FOR CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF MEDICAL DEVICES

Document Title: File Notes. Document Number: 024

This Agreement dated DD/MM/YYYY (the Effective Date ) is between

SOP MONITORING & OVERSIGHT OF RESEARCH ACTIVITY. Contact Jess Bisset, Research Operations Manager x20227

Clinical Governance & Risk Management Awareness. Incl. investigation of accidents, complaints and claims. Unit 2

Reporting an Incident

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Ventilation Policy

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

Trial set-up, conduct and Trial Master File for HEY-sponsored CTIMPs

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Guide to Incident Reporting for In-vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices

Health & Safety Policy

Marie-Claire Rickard, RG and GCP Manager Jimena Lovos, Quality Assurance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Governance Operations Manager

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Auditing of Clinical Trials

Sponsor Responsibilities. Roles and Responsibilities. EU Directives. UK Law

Document Title: Version Control of Study Documents. Document Number: 023

National Health Regulatory Authority Kingdom of Bahrain

Informed Consent SOP Number: 25 Version Number: 6.0 Effective Date: 1 st September 2017 Review Date: 1 st September 2019

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

Medicines Governance Service to Care Homes (Care Home Service)

Research Governance Standard Operating Procedures (Including ethical review)

Document Title: Research Database Application (ReDA) Document Number: 043

Document Number: 006. Version: 1. Date ratified: Name of originator/author: Heidi Saunders, Senior Portfolio Coordinator

Details: Approval: Distribution & Storage: Pharmacovigilance for Researchers for UoL / LTHT Sponsored CTIMPs. Standard Operating Procedure

NHS CHOICES COMPLAINTS POLICY

GCP INSPECTORATE GCP INSPECTIONS METRICS REPORT

DIAGNOSTIC CLINICAL TESTS AND SCREENING PROCEDURES MANAGEMENT POLICY

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Document Title: Research Database Application (ReDA) Document Number: 043

Health and Safety Roles, Responsibilities and Organisation

HIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies

managing or activities.

Medicines Management Strategy

Renewal Inspection Report. Ninewells Hospital Date of Inspection: 13 May 2009 Date of Licence Committee: 12 August 2009

Visiting Celebrities, VIPs and other Official Visitors

M. Rickard, Research Governance and GCP Manager R. Fay Research Governance and GCP Manager Elizabeth Clough, Governance Operations Manager

Rail Training Accreditation Scheme (RTAS) Rules

Standard Operating Procedure. Essential Documents: Setting Up a Trial Master File. SOP effective: 19 February 2016 Review date: 19 February 2018

HAEMOVIGILANCE POLICY

POL:02:UP:001:07:NIBT PAGE 1 of 6 ISSUE DATE: 12 DECEMBER 2014 EFFECTIVE DATE: 9 JANUARY 2015

Good Practice Guidance : Safe management of controlled drugs in Care Homes

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

SOP:07:QA:070:08:NIBT PAGE 1 of 26

Guide to Incident Reporting for General Medical Devices and Active Implantable Medical Devices

Governance %%.4- r2&% Queen s University Belfast. Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance. r2.aoc7. Research and Enterprise

PART A. In order to achieve its objectives, this Code embodies a number of functional requirements. These include, but are not limited to:

RD SOP12 Research Passport Honorary Contracts / Letters of Access

OH&S Policy Aims. Scope and Application. Definitions

Version: 3.0. Effective from: 29/08/2012

WIRBinar. How to Survive an FDA Inspection. Upcoming Trainings: Contact Us: (360)

Non Medical Prescribing Policy

Stroke in Young Adults Funding Opportunity for Mid- Career Researchers. Guidelines for Applicants

New v1.0 Date: Cathy Riley - Director of Pharmacy Policy and Procedures Committee Policy and Procedures Committee

SOP16: Standard Operating Procedure for Establishing Sites and Centres - Site Setup

HUNGERHILL SCHOOL HEALTH & SAFETY POLICY

Managing medicines in care homes

Asbestos Management Policy (Version 4)

specialising in maths and computing Health, Safety and Environmental Policy Date March 2012 Review Date March 2014 Governor Committee Health & Safety

Incident Reporting & Investigation

Post Market Surveillance Requirements. SAMED Regulatory Conference 2 December 2015

Hertfordshire Hospitals R&D Consortium Incorporating West Herts Hospitals NHS Trust and East & North Herts NHS Trust

Social care guideline Published: 14 March 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/sc1

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Transcription:

Human Samples in Research Adverse Event Reporting Document Identifier HTA-11-SOP-Adverse Event Reporting AUTHOR APPROVER EFFECTIVE DATE: Name and role Signature and date Name and role Signature and date 01.09.16 Dr Lisa Wakeman HTA Governance Officer Signed copy held in ABM UHB R&D Office Professor Catherine Thornton Designated Individual Signed copy held in ABM UHB R&D Office REVIEW 01.09.18 DATE: Document History Version Review Date Comment Replaces Reviewed by 2.0 21.09.15 Updated header/footers and 1.0 Lisa Wakeman front page. Inclusion of reporting timescales; minor text amendments and removal of appendix to standalone form. 3.0 01.09.16 Post-licence grant review, amendment from acting designated individual reference; minor text amendments. 2.0 Lisa Wakeman Page 1 of 10

1. Purpose A key part of quality management is a robust system for reporting and investigating adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE). The purpose of this Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is to ensure that all staff and students undertaking research understand what constitutes a human tissuerelated serious adverse event and are aware of the requirements and mechanisms for reporting adverse events. This SOP applies to adverse events that occur to human tissue and non-compliance with the Human Tissue Act 2004 (HT Act) and Human Tissue Authority (HTA) Codes of Practice only. Adverse events that involve equipment, staff, students and patients should be reported separately using existing organizational adverse event reporting systems. 2. Background The HT Act and HTA require that organizations have in place processes and systems which capture, report and monitor adverse events that occur to human tissue. Licensed organizations should have systems in place to record adverse events and subsequently identify and implement preventative and corrective measures following any adverse tissue-related event. Reporting AEs/incidents helps to: Learn lessons and prevent recurrences Improve practice as a consequence of the findings Set priorities for e.g. training and/or other resources to prevent future incidents Examples of human tissue AEs in the Research Sector include events that could or do lead to theft, damage to sample integrity or the wishes of participants not being upheld. Adverse events occurring within the Research Sector are not required to be reported to the HTA, however evidence of internal systems to identify and manage events is mandatory for compliance with licensing requirements. 3. Roles and Responsibilities All staff and students who become aware of an incident affecting the integrity of human tissue samples has a responsibility to report and investigate it in the manner described in this SOP. The Designated Individual (DI) has a responsibility to implement and maintain a system of adverse event reporting and monitoring which improves quality standards and to oversee the management of individual incidents to closure. Page 2 of 10

The Person(s) Designate (PD) has a responsibility for overseeing the implementation of measures to address deficiencies identified within their area. Principal Investigators (PIs) are responsible for ensuring that risk assessments are carried out for their studies to minimize the likelihood of an adverse event occurring. The HTA Governance Officer is responsible for maintaining a log of adverse events and ensuring this SOP remains fit for purpose. 4. Procedure 4.1 Identification of an Adverse Event All members of staff and students working with, or responsible for, human tissue should familiarize themselves with the contents of this SOP in order to be in a position to identify an adverse event. Further guidance can be obtained from the Human Tissue Act Governance Officer or the DI. Any serious AE that occurs under the HTA licence must be recorded and reported within 24 hours. Human tissue-related AEs are identified based on breaches of the HT Act, HTA governance standards and HTA Codes of Practice and on the HTA classification of adverse events and reactions. Examples include: Consent o Human tissue removed from a patient / participant without appropriate and or valid consent. o Consent sought / obtained by an individual without appropriate training o Consent for use of human tissue not filed / retained correctly o Human tissue used or stored outside the governance of a Research Ethics Committee (REC) approved study o Human tissue used without appropriate consent o No evidence of consent where sought by third parties Governance and Quality Systems o Documentation and Records Incorrect version of SOP in use Loss of records Breach of data protection or confidentiality Material transferred without appropriate review, authorization or documentation (MTA/contract) Page 3 of 10

o Tissue Collection and Traceability Incorrect tissue type collected Unlabelled material Tissue unusable Sample integrity compromised in transit Sample location / log discrepancy o Storage facilities, Premises and Equipment o Disposal Storage unit failure with no loss of tissue (near miss) Storage unit failure with resulting loss of tissue Unauthorised access to storage facilities with no resulting compromised tissue (near miss) Unauthorised access to storage facilities resulting in sample loss or damage Incorrect storage conditions / units for sample type Human samples disposed of Inappropriately Records of disposal of human tissue absent, not retained or incomplete Disposal of human tissue not in line with donors wishes, where specified. o Transportation Loss of sample integrity during transport Loss of samples Samples transferred to third parties without appropriate documentation in place (MTA, contract) Incorrect samples transferred Samples imported without DI approval Page 4 of 10

Table 1 - Examples of categorization of adverse events are shown below: Category Serious Moderate Minor Near Miss Example Conduct of non-licensed activities (e.g. storage of relevant material for research without NHS REC approval) Non-recoverable loss of unique relevant material (e.g. through freezer/alarm failure) Relevant material removed from a participant, stored or used without appropriate consent Staff member seeking consent without appropriate training Loss/compromise of relevant material and/or patient records during transportation Relevant material used for a research study without NHS REC approval Breach of Data protection/confidentiality Failure to dispose of material appropriately Relevant material transported without appropriate transfer agreement (e.g. MTA, SLA) in place Labeling error that lead to the incorrect use of samples Inappropriate transport of specimens Incorrect version of policy or SOP in use Not registering new SOPs or updating existing SOPS to reflect changes in practice Documentation temporarily misplaced An adverse event could have occurred if intervention had not been made, e.g. Short term cold storage failure with no harm to tissue Freezer failure leading to the requirement to transfer samples to alternative locations. Alarm failure with no harm to tissue Labeling error that was remedied Unauthorised access to tissue under licence with no harm to tissue 4.2 Reporting an Adverse Event / Reaction All staff and students working with human tissue who encounter an event should liaise with the relevant PD to generate an incident report. Where a concern is raised by any other individual (e.g. patient, visitor, internal / external auditor) the PD should ensure that an adverse event is reported on their behalf. Events occurring under a HTA licence must be reported to the DI within 24 hours. 4.2.1 ABM University Health Board Procedure AEs occurring on Health Board premises should be reported using the Datix online incident reporting system. The HTA Governance Officer must also be notified and will categorise and log the incident, assign a reference, Page 5 of 10

inform the DI and liaise with the PD to complete the Human Tissue Adverse Event Reporting Form HTA-03-FORM-Adverse Event Reporting Form and track the progress of the incident to closure. Other members of the Health Board will be notified where appropriate, particularly where patient care/safety is compromised. Summaries of all events occurring under a HTA licence will be provided to the ABM UHB HTA Committee and the Health Board R&D Department. 4.2.2 Swansea University Procedure AEs occurring on Swansea University premises should be reported to the Human Tissue Act Governance Officer using the Human Tissue Adverse Event Reporting Form HTA-03-FORM-Adverse Event Reporting Form. The HTA Governance Officer will review the report to ensure correct classification, log the event, assign a reference, notify the DI and track the progress of the incident to closure. Summaries of all events occurring under a HTA licence will be provided to the Swansea University HTA Sub- Committee. 4.2.3 Notification to Corporate Licence Holder All SAEs and SARs occurring under a HTA licence will be notified by the DI/HTA Governance Officer to the representative of the corporate licence holder within 24 hours of receipt. 4.3 Investigation and follow up PDs are responsible for undertaking an immediate local investigation. The investigation must attempt to identify the root cause of the event (What happened? why did it happen? how did it happen?). Corrective and preventative actions (CAPAs) should be identified and implemented, to defined timescales, to avoid recurrence of the event. Once the AE has been reported formally to the DI and HTA Governance Officer, the PD (or other appropriate individual) will be required to complete a CAPA form HTA-04-FORM-CAPA and implement the identified actions. Corrective actions are those actions which are reactive to an adverse event and aim to rectify the problem. Preventative actions are those actions which are taken to preempt recurrence of the issue. When managing CAPAs, each action should be assigned a responsible individual and a timescale for completion. CAPA forms should be returned to the HTA Governance Officer within one week identifying: corrective and preventative actions who is responsible for each action timescale for each action Page 6 of 10

The HTA Governance Officer will liaise with the reporting PD and DI to monitor implementation of the actions. Corrective and preventative actions identified on the CAPA form should generally be implemented within one month, after which the event will be closed. Documented review of risk assessments should always form part of the CAPAs. Once all actions are implemented and the HTA Governance Officer and DI notified of completion, the event can be closed. All AEs will be monitored by the DI and must be followed up until closure. The HTA Governance Officer or DI will follow up no later than 3 months after the event to ascertain progress and arrange future audit. 4.4 Closure Once the DI is satisfied that all CAPAs have been implemented, and no further action is required, the HTA Governance Officer will close the event and inform all relevant parties by e-mail. The signed original Adverse Event Report will be retained by the HTA Governance Officer. Page 7 of 10

4.5 Process Summary Observation of Adverse Event Person Designate / PI completes and submits HTA Adverse Event Report Form HTA-03-FORM-Adverse Event to HTA Governance Officer within 24 hours of event. Licence Holder informed within a further 24 hours HTA Governance Officer issues CAPA form HTA-04-FORM-CAPA Research teams/pi/pd complete CAPA form and timescales and return to HTA Governance Officer within one week Research teams/pi/pd implement corrective and preventative actions and submit fully completed CAPA form to HTA Governance Officer within one month of initial report DI/HTA Governance Officer review progress at 3 months maximum. On completion, DI reviews, and signs off CAPA, and the adverse event is closed Page 8 of 10

5. References HTA Code of Practice 9 Research http://www.hta.gov.uk/_db/_documents/code_of_practice_9_-_research.pdf HTA Summary of Inspections 2006-2008 Research Department of Health http://www.hta.gov.uk/_db/_documents/hta-inspection-research-v3.pdf HTA Standards for the Research Sector http://www.hta.gov.uk/_db/_documents/ht_act_research_sector_standards.pdf 6. Risk Assessment A risk assessment for this HTA governance SOP is not required. 7. Definitions Adverse Event (AE) Any untoward occurrence associated with the procurement, testing, processing, storage and distribution of human tissue and cells that might lead to loss or damage of human tissue. Chief Investigator (CI) The individual who takes overall responsibility for the design, conduct and reporting of a study if it is at one site; or if the study involves researchers at more than one site, the Chief Investigator takes responsibility for the design, management and reporting of the study, co-ordinating the investigators who take the lead at each site. Designated Individual (DI) The person who is authorised and who supervises activities under a licence issued by the Human Tissue Authority. Human samples, tissue and material - All material derived from a human (cellular and acellular) that may be acquired, stored and used in research. Human Tissue Authority (HTA) The governing body set up to regulate activities that come under the HT Act. The HTA is a watchdog that supports public confidence by licensing organisations that store and use human tissue for purposes such as research, patient treatment, post-mortem examination, teaching, and public exhibitions. Person Designate (PD) A person to whom the licence applies and to whom the authority conferred by the licence extends. Each School operating under an HTA Licence should have at least one Person Designate. Principal Investigator (PI) is the appropriately qualified individual at each project site who has responsibility for the conduct of the project at that site. Page 9 of 10

Research - A study which addresses clearly defined questions, aims and objectives in order to discover and interpret new information or reach new understanding of the structure, function and disorders of the human body. Research attempts to derive new knowledge and includes studies that aim to generate hypotheses, as well as studies that aim to test them or develop practical applications of new knowledge. Risk Assessment - a careful examination of what could cause harm to people or resources. Workers and others have a right to be protected from harm caused by a failure to take reasonable control measures. Scheduled Purposes - The activities relating to the removal, storage and use of human organs and other tissue that require consent, listed in Schedule 1 of the HT Act, e.g. research in connection with disorders or the functioning of the human body. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) - Detailed, written instructions to achieve uniformity of the performance of a specific function which an integral part of a quality management system. In the context of research using human samples, SOPs document all the processes that affect the quality and safety of those samples (e.g. acquisition, storage, transfer and disposal). *For guidance on relevant material as defined by the HTA please contact the HTA Governance Officer or refer to: http://www.hta.gov.uk/_db/_documents/list_of_materials_considered_to_be_relevant_material_under_t he_human_tissue_act_2004.pdf Page 10 of 10