UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES. MAE UAVs. Naval UAV Offsite Conference 20 May 1998 LtCol Mark King 5/29/98 EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC

GAO VEHICLES UNMANNED AERIAL. DOD's Acquisition Efforts

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

RQ-4A GLOBAL HAWK UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) SYSTEMS

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: MQ-9 Development and Fielding. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

Airborne Battlefield Command and Control Center. Acquisition Category. Air Combat Command. Air Combat Command Commander in Chief

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Undersea Warfare Advanced Technology

UAV s And Homeland Defense Now More Critical Than Ever. LCDR Troy Beshears UAV Platform Manager United States Coast Guard

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

Inspector General FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM POLICY AND MANAGEMENT

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Aerial Targets & Unmanned Aviation

STATEMENT OF RADM ANTHONY L. WINNS DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE AND BGEN MARTIN POST ASSISTANT DEPUTY COMMANDANT

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Unmanned Combat Air Veh(UCAV) Adv Cp/Proto Dev. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

LPD 17 AMPHIBIOUS TRANSPORT DOCK SHIP

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

Armed Unmanned Systems

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Systems Engineering Analysis of Unmanned Maritime Vehicles for USCG Mission Threads. LT J.B. Zorn, USCG CRUSER Group February 15, 2013

Logbook Navy Perspective on Joint Force Interdependence Navigating Rough Seas Forging a Global Network of Navies

USMC Expeditionary Energy

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

MQ-8B FIRE SCOUT. Operational Scenario. MQ-8B Fire Scout Air Vehicle Specifications United States Navy

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Air Control

Subj: IDENTIFICATION OF MAJOR PROGRAM MANAGER EQUIVALENT BILLETS

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

NSWCCD-SSES SSES COMMAND OVERVIEW. 12 June Patricia C. Woody Department Head Machinery Research and Engineering

Unmanned Systems. Northrop Grumman Today Annual Conference

N/JT CNTR RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELEC WAR (JCREW)

Naval Audit Service Audit Report Aircraft Quantitative Requirements for the Acquisition of the Joint Primary Aircraft Training System

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Unmanned Systems and Mine Warfare RADM Matthew Klunder Chief of Naval Research November 5, 2014

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle

ONR Command Overview. Mr. Craig A. Hughes Deputy Director of Research September Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Multi-Mission Maritime Aircraft Acquisition Planning: Requirements Development and Maturation

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM FOR SECURITY AND INDEPENDENCE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification. February COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

The Marine Corps Operating Concept How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21 st Century

Assessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #58

Advance Questions for Dr. Delores M. Etter Nominee for Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

The Coastal Systems Station Strategic Perspective

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification. June 2001 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA7

CERTIFICATION OF THE AVIATION CAPABILITY OF SHIPS OPERATING AIRCRAFT

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

U.S. Forces in Afghanistan

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operations

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

F oreword. Working together, we will attain the greatest degree of spectrum access possible for the current and future Navy/Marine Corps team.

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Global Broadcast Service (GBS) FY 2011 OCO Estimate. FY 2011 Total Estimate

Subj: SURFACE SHIP AND SUBMARINE SURVIVABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

124 STAT PUBLIC LAW JAN. 7, 2011

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #181

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Airborne Reconnaissance Advanced Development (ARAD)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

WikiLeaks Document Release

DoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap

Lessons Learned in Fielding a UAS in the Combat Theater

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY TH STREET SOUTH, STE 203 ARLINGTON, VA

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

USN Arctic Roadmap SCICEX SAC meeting. CDR Nick Vincent 21 May 2014

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES BUDGET DATA BOOK OFFICE OF BUDGET

Navy & Marine Corps Vertical Lift: Past and Future

Transcription:

MAE UAVs Naval UAV Offsite Conference 20 May 1998 LtCol Mark King 1

Background The Navy has a Medium Altitude Endurance (MAE) Requirement; See CNO Memo of 18 Oct 95, and Naval Requirements Memo of 1 Feb 96. Debate over how The Navy would use Predator to fulfill its MAE requirement went on for many months; finally, a Marinization Study was completed on 1 Oct 1996. The CNO made the decision to not go forward with a fully marinized Predator system as the solution for the Navy s MAE requirement; but to use data receipt and positional control of the Air Forces Predator systems. On 29 Jan 97 a letter to congress was signed by ASN RDA & DARO stating that based on the results of the marinization study that, The Navy has decided not to develop a launch and recovery capability for the Predator UAV from CV/CVN and LHA/LHD class ships. The Navy has re-examined its earlier decision against marinizing Predator several times. 2

Navy s Medium Altitude Endurance (MAE) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Requirements NAVAL REQUIREMENTS MEMORANDUM -- 1 FEB 96 500NM RANGE 24 HOURS ENDURANCE (ON STATION TIME) EO/IR PAYLOAD SAR DIRECT REAL-TIME RECEIPT OF IMAGERY SATCOM FOR BEYOND LINE OF SIGHT OPERATIONS MISSION PLANNING INTEGRATION WITH TAMPS ABILITY TO RETASK UAV FROM SHIPS AND ASHORE INTEGRATION OF CHBDL FOR LINE OF SIGHT OPERATIONS INTEGRATION WITH JSIPS, TEG, DIWS,AND TMPCU SYSTEMS COMPLIANCE WITH GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM - LAUNCH AND RECOVERY FROM LHA/D & CV/CVN CLASS SHIPS - AUTOMATIC LAUNCH & RECOVERY CAPABILITY WITH SHIP MOTION SENSING - HEAVY FUEL ENGINE - CORROSION RESISTANCE, ADAPTABLE & COMPATIBLE WITH SHIPBOARD ENVIRONMENT - ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE SHIELDING CURRENT PREDATOR SYSTEM: CAN MEET 6 OF THESE REQUIREMENTS (NOT QUITE 24 HOURS ENDURANCE AT 500NM) 5 MORE WILL BE ACHIEVED THROUGH THE TCS - THE REMAINING 5 WILL ONLY BE ACHIEVED THROUGH MARINIZATION MODIFICATIONS 3

How Many Predator Systems? During the Predator ACTD, USACOM identified three (3) Predator systems as the answer for Navy operations in support of a two MRC scenario. A system consists of 4 air vehicles, 1 ground control station, 1 Trojan Spirit II (or Naval equivalent), and 60-65 personnel (Air Force numbers) 4

How Much? Predator systems at $25-30M per systems. Marinization costs according to the feasibility study: (Based on : 3 systems =12 air vehicles, 12 CV/CVN ship alts) NRE (RDT&E): $10,563K Air Vehicle: $508K X 12 = 6,096K Ship: $1,760K X 12 = 21,120K Manpower: $3.1M per system per year OMN: $2M per system per year BOTTOM LINE: It will take at least $120M to procure a marinized Predator program for the Navy, plus an additional $15M per year for MPN and OMN. 5

Pro s Con s Pro/Cons Fill important Warfighting requirement Significant TAC RECCE advance Proven capability of Predator Congressional support TCS compatibility Cost of the base system plus marinization modifications Limited to big deck ships; principally CV/CVNS. Navy MAE requirement can be partially satisfied by Air Force Predators Developmental risks: Heavy fuel engine and other Marinization requirements. Survivability in Medium to High threat environment. 6

Recommendation & Decision Stay with Current Plan. Work on Predator CONOPS with Air Force. Use Predator and/or Predator Surrogate UAVs at Fallon. Stress importance of Tactical Control System (TCS). 7

BACKUP THE REFERENCES UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 13 JAN 95 ADM BOORDA MEMO VCNO LETTER OF 18 OCT 95; NAVY REQUIREMENTS FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAVS) VCNO & ACMC MEMO OF 1 FEB 96; NAVAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) REQUIREMENTS MARINIZED MAE UAV MISSION NEEDS STATEMENT (MNS); APR 96 (IN STAFFING) RADM BENNITT'S MSG PREDATOR MARINIZATION FEASIBILITY STUDY; 1 OCT 96 ASN RDA & DARO LETTER TO CONGRESS ON PREDATOR MARINIZATION; 29 JAN 97 CINCLANTFLT MSG 27 FEB 97; VTOL UAV VISION THE NAVY S UAV PROGRAM OF RECORD; VADM PILLING S CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY, APR 97. THE NAVAL POSITION ON TACTICAL UAV REQUIREMENTS; 22 MAY 97 CNO RESPONSE TO ADM LOPEZ MSG PREDATOR ORD 8

OPTIONS STAY WITH CURRENT PLAN. WORK ON PREDATOR CONOPS WITH AIR FORCE AND PREDATOR SURROGATE UAVS. SEEK ORGANIC PREDATORS FOR NAVY. GO AHEAD WITH COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS, AND PREDATOR FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION ABOARD CV/CVN SHIP. SEEK NEW MAE SOLUTION. EXAMPLE -- FOCUS ON VTOL TUAV. FROM THE VTOL TUAV EVOLVE A VTOL UAV WHICH CAN SUPPORT THE MAE TYPE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRIKE WARFARE. 9