How the Miami CTSI helps advance human protections and quality in clinical research

Similar documents
(Type inside gray boxes, cells will expand) A. EIGHT POINT CRITERIA for IRB Review

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky

I. Scope This policy defines unanticipated problems and adverse events and establishes the reporting process and timeline.

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

Ethics for a learning health care system: The Common Purpose Framework. Nancy E. Kass, ScD Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics

PROSpect The PRone and OScillation Pediatric Clinical Trial

AN OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDY TASKS AND ACTIVITIES

SMA Clinical Care Center Network / Clinical Data Registry & Clinical Trials Site Readiness for SMA. March 21, 2018

SOP Problems and Adverse Events, Record and Report

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

University of South Carolina. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Guidelines

The SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.

The GCP Perspective on Study Monitoring

RESEARCH GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Setting up a CITI account for users not enrolled at or employed by Georgia Tech. Georgia Institute of Technology December 2016

Office of Human Research Office of Human Research Policy and Procedure Manual. Version: 4/4/18

A New Ethical Framework for the Learning Healthcare System: The Hopkins Model

Jacqueline H. Tran, MPH Orange County Asian and Pacific Islander Community Alliance. Eric C. Wat, MA Special Service for Groups.

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Data and Safety Monitoring Plan

Title: Back Bracing Measuring or Addressing Misconceptions, and Moving to Components of Positive Outcomes

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES WARNING LETTER. (b) (4) clinical investigation (Protocol entitled A Phase II, Multicenter,

Title: Investigator Responsibilities. SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017

Join the Conquest What s New? Information and Feedback Session

SYNERGY TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS INSTITUTE

NURSING (MN) Nursing (MN) 1

Topic 7: Pilot and Feasibility Testing

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

RESEARCH GRANTS COUNCIL

The Clinical Investigation Policy and Procedure Manual Document: CIPP

Training components for GCP. inspectors in PMDA. Tomonori Tateishi, MD, PhD Office of Conformity Audit, PMDA

Full application deadline Noon on April 4, Presentations to Scientific Review Committee (if invited) May 11, 2016

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

MSCRF Discovery Program

MMC-Einstein Research IT Forum

"Getting Your Protocol Through the IRB"

IRB 101. Rachel Langhofer Joan Rankin Shapiro Research Administration UA College of Medicine - Phoenix

HIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies

ACCF Diabetes Collaborative Registry Program Requirements v1.2 Posted on 9/14/2015

Title: Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Addressing Knee Instability, Restoring Function, and Reducing Pain & Opioid Usage

ETHICS COMMITTEE: ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS K.R.CHANDRAMOHANAN NAIR DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Ethics for a learning healthcare system

Risk-Benefit Ratio and Determinations. Sarah Mumford, Ammon Pate, Annie Risenmay IRB Operations Managers University of Utah

Information for Hospitals wishing to join The Global Tracheostomy Collaborative (GTC)

INSPIRing Changes to the IRB Process: New templates and more

University of Illinois at Chicago Human Subjects Protection Program Plan

HCHS/SOL. Implementation of Ancillary Studies. HCHS/SOL Coordinating Center

CORD BLOOD TRANSPLANTATION STUDY MOP CHAPTER 7 MEDICAL COORDINATING CENTER PROCEDURES

CHAPTER 2 STUDY POLICIES

Biomedical IRB MS #

October, 2016 Pediatric Heart Network Policy Manual

Roles of Investigators in the Managements of Clinical Trials

Greater Value Portfolio

SUNY Upstate Medical University GUIDELINES & POLICIES

NIDA-AACAP Resident Training Award Application

a. Community-placed/based research b. Sporadic or symbolic inclusion of communities c. A specific method or research design

An Invitation to Apply: Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University ECU Physicians: Chief Medical Informatics Officer (CMIO)

NURS 147A NURSING PRACTICUM PSYCHIATRIC/MENTAL HEALTH NURSING CLINICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA. SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY School of Nursing

RESTRICTED PROJECTS: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES May 2009

Definition of Patient-Oriented Research

Rules of Engagement: Collaborating with Non-BU/BMC Investigators. Mary A. Banks BS, BSN Director, BU/BMC IRB December 2010

36 th Annual Meeting Preconference Workshop P4 Handout

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Veterans Medical Research Foundation San Diego, CA 92161

FACULTY GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES

1. Department of Defense (DoD) Human Subjects Protection Regulatory Requirements

Post-Professional Doctor of Occupational Therapy Elective Track in Aging

CTN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GUIDE

SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER RESEARCH PROGRAM POLICY

NN SS 401 NEURONEXT NETWORK STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR SITE SELECTION AND QUALIFICATION

Approved by: UMMG Executive Committee. Date Approved: NOVEMBER 22, 2011

Clinical Investigator Career Development Award ( )

Prior Assessed Learning (PAL) Application

When a Single IRB Reviews for Multiple Sites:

RESEARCH STRATEGIC PLAN: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, OBJECTIVES, KEY STRATEGIES, AND KEY TACTICS

Are you participating in any other research studies? Yes No

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

ETHICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

DO I NEED TO SUBMIT FOR THIS?... & OTHER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. March 2015 IRB Forum

DNP Student Handbook

16 STUDY OVERSIGHT Clinical Quality Management Plans

Post-Professional Doctor of Occupational Therapy Advanced Practice Track

University of Iowa Institute for Clinical and Translational Science (ICTS)

RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT

PrMEIR Innovation Grants Theme: Transitions in Medical Education: Improving Transitions along the UME, GME, or CME Continuum

M6728. Goals. The Nuremberg Code. Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results

Objectives. Empowering Nurses Through Evidence-Based Practice (EBP), Quality Improvement (QI), and Research. Announcements and Disclosures

THE MARILYN HILTON AWARD FOR INNOVATION IN MS RESEARCH BRIDGING AWARD FOR PHYSICIAN SCIENTISTS Request for Proposals

Good Clinical Practice. Lisa de Blieck MPA CCRC Clinical Trials Coordination Center

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) DEPARTMENT OF NURSING SERVICES AND PATIENT CARE QUALITY PLAN Office of Nursing Quality

AFMRD Guidelines for Individual Areas of Concentration

Understanding and improving the quality of medication use: Research in Clinical Pharmacy starting from Academia. Anne Spinewine

LifeBridge Health HIPAA Policy 4. Uses of Protected Health Information for Research

The Greenville Hospital System Office of Research Compliance and Administration HRPP Policies and Procedures

Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Division Maywood, IL. Human Subject Research Project Start-Up Guide

Prepared by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Protocol Development and Regulatory Compliance Department

Transcription:

How the Miami CTSI helps advance human protections and quality in clinical research Jonelle E. Wright, PhD, DPNAP Associate Director and Co-Investigator, Miami CTSI

Objectives Illustrate key strategies for promoting the safety of clinical research study participants Learn a participatory approach to developing your study s human subject protection plan Explain CTSI s role in clinical research process improvement

Three Pillars of Safety IRB Consent Managing AEs

Essentials of IRBs Independent body comprised of a wide variety of faculty, research experts, and public representatives Review research activities involving human subjects to ensure that: Ethical standards for the care and protection of human subjects have been established Research activities are in compliance with pertinent regulations (federal, state, local, and institutional)

Essentials of Consent Continuous process vs. signing a consent form Understanding relevant information General comprehension vs. appreciating relevance to personal situation Need to manage personal factors such as anxiety, desperation Intentionality Seeking one more chance for a cure Wanting to help future patients and promoting scientific knowledge Voluntariness Clinician-researchers, family, or fellow patients Incentive pay or only way to get affordable treatment Brody BA. (2001). Making informed consent meaningful. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 23(5):1-5.

Essentials of Managing AEs Adhering to regulations Regulations can be confusing, differing across federal agencies Determining if risk-benefit ratio changes Severity is judged by the PI and relevant data are often unavailable Different descriptors and care standards can make clinical significance hard to interpret Hard to evaluate specific circumstances not considered endpoints Morse MA, Califf RM, and Sugerman J. (2001). Monitoring and Ensuring Safety During Clinical Research. JAMA 285(9):1201-1205

Essentials of Managing AEs Paramount decision: Foreseeable Sacrifice Risk Cost Inconvenience Anticipated Benefit Participant Study Society Morse MA, Califf RM, and Sugerman J. (2001). Monitoring and Ensuring Safety During Clinical Research. JAMA 285(9):1201-1205

Essentials of Managing AEs Governing Principle: The Science Societal interests Study Participants Rights Safety Well-being Morse MA, Califf RM, and Sugerman J. (2001). Monitoring and Ensuring Safety During Clinical Research. JAMA 285(9):1201-1205

Essential Elements of Good Studies Team work Extensive planning and preparation Meticulous implementation Systematic real-time study monitoring

Objectives Illustrate key strategies for promoting the safety of clinical research study participants Learn a participatory approach to developing your study s human subject protection plan Explain CTSI s role in clinical research process improvement

New Paradigm: 4 Pillars of Safety IRB review and approval Consent Managing Adverse Events Shared responsibility for strong real-time study oversight

Data and Safety Monitoring Plan Responsibility for safety Risk minimization Adverse events and study deviations Monitoring study implementation and progress Study termination Confidentiality, data integrity, and security

Strong Study Oversight Protocol planning in light of: Study participants Target disorder, severity of illness Risks and side effects associated with investigational intervention Invasiveness and risks accompanying protocol procedures Research roles and licensure Real-time monitoring program Study participant safety Data integrity Active feedback loop protocol modification from monitoring results

Objectives Illustrate key strategies for promoting the safety of clinical research study participants Learn a participatory approach to developing your study s human subject protection plan Explain CTSI s role in clinical research process improvement

Process Improvement Activities CRORS-CTSI Collaboration Clinical Research Quality Champions Research Professionals networking and communications NCRP UWay orientation and CBLs Research Subject Advocacy Champions Liaison to facilitate UM research at JMH Facilitating UM research at JMH Marisabel Davalos CTSI senior manager working with Drs. Heros and Velazquez Research recruitment initiatives

Research Tools and Best Practices Nation-wide research competencies and training curriculum ($6M NIH Award) REDCap: Tool for clinical study management & data capture Creates standardized online surveys; databases Easy data transfer, export data into a variety of statistical programs Translated into multiple languages for use worldwide

UResearch Informatics Data Environment Google-like tool De-identified EPIC data for research User agreement required CTSI biostatistics support Brief Steering Committee review prior to dissemination of research product Instructional CBL

UResearch Informatics Data Environment

CTSI Services

Comments? Questions?