Inquiry Response DCN July 2005

Similar documents
Department of the Air Force

WASHINGTON DC. SUBJECT: 2005 AF Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC 2005) Site Survey Guidance

DCN: Hall, Craig, CIV, WSO-BRAC

Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates AIR FORCE RESERVE FY 2011 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

Realignment Commission

BRAC 2005 Issues. Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group. December 12, 2003

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY. This publication is available digitally. There are no releasability restrictions on this publication.

Kulis Air Guard Station and Elmendorf Air Force Base, AK

Air Force Reserve Facilities Update Briefing FY10

Department of the Air Force

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

4677 th DEFENSE SYSTEMS EVALUATION SQUADRON

419 th FIGHTER WING. STATIONS Scott AFB, IL, 27 Jun May 1951 Hill AFB, UT, 1 Oct 1982

Impact of the War on Terrorism on the USAF

Annual Reserve Component Facilities Program Update

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

BASE VISIT REPORT DYESS AIR FORCE BASE, TX 27 JUNE 2005

Analysis of Incurred Claims Trend and Provider Payments


FY18 President s Budget Request

BOARD MEETING MINUTES JOINT SERVICES RESERVE COMPONENT FACILITY BOARD

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Candidate #USAF-0102 / S904 Establish USAF Logistics Support Centers

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Legislative Report. President s Budget Request for Fiscal Year 2018 OVERVIEW. As of June 8, 2017

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Air Force Reserve Command

June BRAC Commission C/O NIMAC P.O. Box 231 Niagara Falls, NY Dear Chairman Principi and BRAC Commissioners:

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

SAAG-IMT 30 June 2004

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

The Air Force Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act Implementation Plan

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COBRA REALIGNMENT SUMMARY REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 1/2 Data As Of 4/29/2005 7:24:20 PM, Report Created 4/29/2005 7:26:45 PM

108'~ Air Refueling Wing Future Missions Military Value

Department of Defense

Sand Closure. Part B. (BRAC 91)

U.S. Army Audit Agency

Colonel John D. Lamontagne

Ogden Air Logistics Center

AIR FORCE RESERVE COMMAND

AIR FORCE RESERVE COMMAND

Template For ANG Additional Duty Historians

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Wildfire Integration for Civil Support (UAS-WICS) Quick Reaction Test (QRT) Overview Brief

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates AIR FORCE RESERVE FY 2015 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

BASE VlSOT REPORT FORT SILL. OK 11 JUNE 2005

Fiscal Year (FY) 2006/FY 2007 Budget Estimates AIR FORCE RESERVE FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM. February 2005

306th Flying Training Group Open House. 22 May, :00-5:00 P.M. Academy Airfield. United States Air Force Academy, Colorado

Guide to the Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce Collection McClellan Air Force Base Series. Collection Number: 2001/059

AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

RELEASE NOTES. Military Installations, Ranges, and Training Areas (point locations and boundaries) Version 3.0 May 5, 2017

Patterns of Reserve Officer Attrition Since September 11, 2001

GAO MILITARY BASE CLOSURES. DOD's Updated Net Savings Estimate Remains Substantial. Report to the Honorable Vic Snyder House of Representatives

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

BRAC 2005 Issues. Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group. June 6, 2003

TRAINING PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION (TPI) FOR DINFOS - CCLC COMBAT CAMERA LEADERSHIP COURSE

Industrial Joint Cross Service Group

Department of Defense

Legacy Tanker Division

Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 Budget Estimates AIR FORCE RESERVE FY 2014 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

Piasecki CH-21B Workhorse Shaky Magoo Restoration Project

New Castle County Air National Guard Base: Substantial Deviations from Final Selection. Criteria Found in. of Defense Recommendations

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE STATISTICAL DIGEST FISCAL YEAR 2012 PREPARED BY DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY (COST AND ECONOMICS)

Avoiding the Cap Trap What Every Hospice Needs to Know. Matthew Gordon, CPA Principal Consultant / Founder Cap Doctor Associates, Inc.

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Executive Summary Supporting the 183~~ Fighter Wing ANGB Springfield, Illinois

AFI TACTICS ANALYSIS AND REPORTING PROGRAM 9-Dec-15 SECURITY FORCES STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Financial Management Information Systems Development

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY. OPR: AFPAA Certified by: SAF/PAO (Col Marcella F. Adams) Pages: 11

TRIED AND TRUE? INTEGRATING ACTIVE AND RESERVE COMPONENTS

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

USAF Hearing Conservation Program, DOEHRS Data Repository Annual Report: CY2012

United States Air Force Fiscal Year 2011 Force Structure Announcement

Executive Director s Report: Customer Experience Update

This publication is available digitally on the AFDPO WWW site at:

United States Air Force. FY 2011 Budget Overview. Integrity - Service - Excellence

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Financial Management Information Systems Development

Utah Defense Alliance Study To Examine the Feasibility of Moving Utah Air Guard Units from the Salt Lake City Airport to Hill Air Force Base

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES BUDGET DATA BOOK OFFICE OF BUDGET

Twenty-Second Air Force. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e. Mission Briefing. Maj Gen John P. Stokes Commander, 22d Air Force

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

22nd Air Force Mission Briefing. Maj Gen Stayce Harris Commander, 22 AF

Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Budget Estimates AIR FORCE RESERVE FY 2017 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER AFRS INSTRUCTION AIR FORCE RECRUITING SERVICE 21 FEBRUARY 2003 COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

w 2521 CLARK STREET, SUITE 600

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Transcription:

27 July 2005 nquiry Response Re: B-0146, CT-0577, mpact ofbrac on Air Force Active Guard Reserve Force Mix Requester: Ken Small, Tim McGregor Question: Please provide the following quantities and percentages of Active Duty, Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve aircraft, installations, and manpower gained or reduced as a result ofbrac rounds in 1991, 1993 and 1995. Also, please include the same data based upon OSD recommendations as forwarded for the 2005 round. Please use the attached spreadsheet template, or a product of your choosing that includes, in summary form as presented below, the attached data. BRAC Commission POC for this request is Tim McGregor, Air Force Team, 703 699-2922. Answer: n all previous rounds, recommendations to close or realign bases were a result of force structure decisions that occurred or were programmed in the approved force structure plan in accordance with the BRAC statute. The Air Force did not track aircraft gained or reduced as a result of BRAC in previous rounds and does not have records to produce the numbers of aircraft changes by base, by type or component related to particular rounds of closure. The attached document presents the aggregate force structure changes from 1989 through 2005 and the percentage changes. n addition, we included a table depicting the number of installations with flying units approved for closure and realignment in previous rounds and the number of such installations considered. This list includes one installation, Rickenbacker ANGB OH, originally approved for closure in BRAC 91, but approved instead for realignment in BRAC 93 to retain the ANG flying unit in place. Please note that while O'Hare ARS closed, the ANG air refueling mission actually relocated to Scott AFB L (no ANG mission loss). The aggregated numbers and breakout show that between 1989 and 2001 (BRAC 88 through BRAC 95) the majority of closures and realignments occurred in the active component where the force structure inventory decreased by 2629 aircraft or 37.7% and 22 bases or 29% of the total in 1989. n the same time period, the ANG closed no installations while the AF Reserve closed 3 of 16 installations for a net of 20% of the original number. Manpower reductions associated with force structure reductions were not chargeable to BRAC and were not tracked in relation to closed or realigned installations. Similarly manpower changes at the gaining installations resulting from BRAC installation realignments including the aircraft transfers were not tracked outside the COBRA models and cannot be accurately reported by installation and/or weapon system. However, between 1989 and 2005, total active military manpower decreased from 570,880 to 359,700 or 37%. During the same period, AFRC total manpower decreased from 83,814 to 75,800 or 10.5% and the ANG total manpower decreased from 116,968 to 107,000 or 8.5%. By 2011, the active manpower is projected to decrease 2,539

authorizations or 0.7%, AFRC will decrease another 625 authorizations or 0.8% and the ANG will increase by 280 authorizations or 0.3%. The BRAC 2005 recommendations were based on the force structure plan, which, by 2025 further reduces total inventory by 478 aircraft. By 2011, the active c~ponent inventory will decrease by 121 aircraft, the ANG inventory will decrease 21~ircraft, and the AFRC by 31 aircraft. As the senior AF leadership stated, the BRAC installation recommendations were consistent with the force structure plan and the need to rebalance forces across all the component parts into more efficiently-sized operating units. Moreover, the numbers above show while there were and will be significant reductions in force structure across all components, the number of ANG flying installations was not reduced prior to this round ofbrac. Approved ~~ DAVD f JOOANSEN, Lt Col, USAF Chief, Base Realignment and Closure Division 2 Atch: 1. nstallation Changes, 1989 to 2005 by component 2. ForceStructurechanges1989-2025 3. Manpower changes by component, 1989-2011

Air Force nstallations with Flying Units Closed by BRAC BRAC88-95 Closure (-), Gain (+) Losing Base Name Component Action Fly, Non-Fly Rd Active Guard Reserve BRAC88 Bases Considered 77 70 15 GEORGE AFB Active Close F 15-Dec-92 88-1 MATHER AFB Active Close F 30-Sep-93 88-1 NORTON AFB Active Realign F 31-Mar-94 88-1 PEASE AFB Active Realign F 31-Mar-91 88-1 CHANUTE AFB Active Close N 30-Sep-93 88 Total Flying Unit Base Closures, this round -4 BRAC 91 Bases Considered 73 70 15 BERGSTROMAFB Active Realign F 30-Sep-93 91-1 CARSWELL AFB Active Realign F 30-Sep-93 91-1 CASTLE AFB Active Close F 30-Sep-95 91-1 EAKER AFB Active Close F 15-Dec-92 91-1 ENGLAND AFB Active Close F 15-Dec-92 91-1 GRSSOM AFB Active Realign F 30-Sep-94 91-1 LORNG AFB Active Close F 30-Sep-94 91-1 MACDLL AFB Active Realign F 31-Mar-94 91-1 MYRTLE BEACH AFB Active Close F 31-Mar-93 91-1 WLLAMS AFB Active Close F 30-Sep-93 91-1 WURTSMTH AFB Active Close F 30-Jun-93 91-1 RCHARDS-GEBAUER ARS Reserve Close F 30-Sep-94 91-1 RCKENBACKER ANGB Guard Realign F 30-Sep-94 91-1 LOWRY AFB Active Realign N 30-Sep-94 91 Total Flying Unit Base Closures, this round -11-1 -1 BRAC93 Bases Considered 62 69 14 GRFFSS AFB Active Realign F 30-Sep-95 93-1 HOMESTEAD AFB Active Realign F 31-Mar-94 93-1 K SAWYER AFB Active Close F 30-Sep-95 93-1 MARCH AFB Active Realign F 31-Mar-96 93-1 PLATTSBURGH AFB Active Close F 30-Sep-95 93-1 RCKENBACKER ANGB* Guard Realign F 30-Sep-94 91 GENTLE AFB Active Close N 30-Sep-97 93 NEWARKAFB Active Close N 30-Sep-96 93 Total Flying Unit Base Closures, this round -5 0 0 * Reopened as station on municipal airport BRAC 95 Bases Considered 57 70 15 MACDLLAFB Active Reverse's NA 13-Jul-01 95 MALMSTROM AFB Active Realign F 13-Jul-01 95-1 REESE AFB Active Close F 30-Sep-97 95-1 BERGSTROM ARB Reserve Close F 30-Sep-97 95-1 O'HARE ARS Reserve Contingent F 30-Jun-99 95-1 O'HARE AGS** Guard Contingent F 30-Jun-99 96 EGLN (EMTE) Active Disestablis N 30-Sep-97 95 GRAND FORKS AFB Active Realign N 30-Sep-98 95 HLL (UTTR) Active Realign N 30-Sep-97 95 KELLY AFB Active Realign N 13-Jul-01 95 MCCLELLAN AFB Active Close N 13-Jul-01 95 ONZUKA AFB Active Realign N 30-Sep-OO 95 REDCAP Active Close N 30-Sep-97 95 ONTARO AGB Guard Close N 30-Sep-97 95 ROSLYN AGS Guard Contingent N 30-Sep-97 95 Total Flying Unit Base Closures, this round -2 0-2 Total -22-1 -3 7/26/2005

Acitve, Guard, Reserve Force Structure Comparison 1989-2011 and Projected total thru 2025 7/26/2005 DCN 7917 ACTVE RESERVE GUARD YEAR Total % % % TOTAL ACTVE Percent AFRC of Total Force ANG Forces TAl Change Change TAl Change Change TAl Change Change 1989 9,215 6,967 497 1,751 75.6% 5.4% 19.0% 1990 9,032 6,813-154 -2.2% 500 3 0.6% 1,719-32 -1.8% 75.4% 5.5% 19.0% 1991 8,510 6,189-624 -9.2% 528 28 5.6% 1,793 74 4.3% 72.7% 6.2% 21.1% 1992 7,642 5,425-764 -12.3% 524-4 -0.8%. 1,693-100 -5.6% 71.0% 6.9% 22.2% 1993 7,183 4,986-439 -8.1% 544 20 3.8% 1653-40 -2.4% 69.4% 7.6% 23.0% 1994 6,818 4,764-222 -4.5% 468-76 -14.0% 1586-67 -4.1% 69.9% 6.9% 23.3% 1995 6,609 4,686-78 -1.6% 462-6 -1.3% 1461-125 -7.9% 70.9% 7.0% 22.1% 1996 6,369 4,496-190 -4.1% 447-15 -3.2% 1426-35 -2.4% 70.6% 7.0% 22.4% 1997 6,317 4,490-6 -0.1% 446-1 -0.2% 1381-45 -3.2% 71.1% 7.1% 21.9% 1998 6,228 4,447-43 -1.0% 430-16 -3.6% 1351-30 -2.2% 71.4% 6.9% 21.7% 1999 6,203 4,413-34 -0.8% 430 0 0.0% 1360 9 0.7% 71.1% 6.9% 21.9% 2000 6,205 4,401-12 -0.3% 442 12 2.8%, 1362 2 0.1% 70.9% 7.1% 22.0% 2001 6,144 4,338-63 -1.4% 445 3 0.7%' 1361-1 -0.1% 70.6% 7.2% 22.2% 2002 6,180 4,384 46 1.1% 446 1 0.2% 1350-11 -0.8% 70.9% 7.2% 21.8% 2003 6,078 4,332-52 -1.2% 433-13 -2.9% 1313-37 -2.7% 71.3% 7.1% 21.6% 2004 6,018 4,284-48 -1.1% 408-25 -5.8% 1,326 13 1.0% 71.2% 6.8% 22.0% 2005 5,807 4,117-167 -3.9% 399-9 -2.2% 1,291-35 -2.6% 70.9% 6.9% 22.2% 2006 5,689 4,075-42 -1.0% 387-12 -3.0% 1,227-64 -5.0% 71.6% 6.8% 21.6% 2007 5,613 4,010-65 -1.6% 386-1 -0.3% 1217-10 -0.8% 71.4% 6.9% 21.7% 2008 5,497 3,969-41 -1.0%, 379-7 -1.8% 1149-68 -5.6% 72.2% 6.9% 20.9% 2009 5,451 3,980 11 0.3% 374-5 -1.3% 1097-52 -4.5% 73.0% 6.9% 20.1% 2010 5,522 4,032 52 1.3% 363-11 -2.9% 1127 30 2.7% 73.0% 6.6% 20.4% 2011 5,440 3,996-36 -0.9% 368 5 1.4% 1076-51 -4.5% 73.5% 6.8% 19.8% TOTAL 2005-2011 -2,971-42.6% -129-26.0% -675-38.5% 2012 5,454 5,454 2013 5,325 5,325 2014 5,377 5,377 2015 5,391 5,391 2016 5,417 5,417 2017 5,412 5,412 2018 5,411 5,411 2019 5,408 5,408 2020 5,401 5,401 2021 5,427 5,427 2022 5,442 5,442 2023 5,424 5,424 2024 5,404 5,404 2025 5,329 5,329 1989-1995 2,629 37.7% 52 10.5% 390 22.3% 2005-2011 -121-2.1% -31-7.8% -215-16.7% 2005-2025 478 8.4% Source: AF Statistical Digests 1989-2004, force Structure Plan, Mar 2005

AF Manpower Changes 1989-2011, By Component Active Reserve ANG Year Auth Change % Change Auth Change % Change Auth Change % Change 1989 570,880 83,814 116,968 2005 359,700-211,180-37.0% 76,100-7,714-9.2% 106,800-10,168-8.7% 2011 357,161-2,539-0.7% 75,475-625 -0.8% 107,080 280 0.3% Source: AF Statistical Digests, AF/DPM