MANUAL FOR FACILITY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CHAMPIONS

Similar documents
REPORT TO ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEES OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

RNAO International Affairs and Best Practice Guidelines Program

ProviderNews2014 Quarter 3

Asthma Disease Management Program

2017 Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Review and Recertification Course

COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT HINDS, RANKIN, MADISON COUNTIES STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.2 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.3 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.3 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.5 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

EVOLENT HEALTH, LLC. Heart Failure Program Description 2017

Dual-eligible SNPs should complete and submit Attachment A and, if serving beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), Attachment D.

DHCC Strategic Plan. Last Revised August 2016

Last Revised February 2018

Using the patient s voice to measure quality of care

DCoE Overview and Accomplishments BIAC Conference September 30-October 2, 2010

Medicare Advantage Quality Improvement Project (QIP) & Chronic Care Improvement Program (CCIP)

The Heart and Vascular Disease Management Program

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Molina Healthcare has defined the following goals for the QI Program:

Examples of Measure Selection Criteria From Six Different Programs

Enhancing Outcomes with Quality Improvement (QI) October 29, 2015

=======================================================================

TABLE H: Finalized Improvement Activities Inventory

PPS Performance and Outcome Measures: Additional Resources

Last Revised March 2017

Community Health Needs Assessment. Implementation Plan FISCA L Y E AR

Example 1: Self-Management: Development of a Self-Management form, Part 1

CHCS. A Guide to the BCAP Quality Framework. Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc. June 2006

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

ProviderReport. Managing complex care. Supporting member health.

St. Lawrence County Community Health Improvement Plan

Healthy Aging Recommendations 2015 White House Conference on Aging

COF WEBINAR 6 AUGUST 29, 2013 HOSTED BY THE REGISTERED NURSES ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO

Amerigroup Washington, Inc. January 2015

7:30 a.m. 8:05 a.m. Welcome/Introductions and Tips for Success Stuart T. Haines, Pharm.D., BCPS, BCACP, BC-ADM

Risk Stratification: Necessary Tool for Value-Based Payments

Overview of Six Texas Demonstrations

Advancing Care Information Performance Category Fact Sheet

Using population health management tools to improve quality

CPC+ CHANGE PACKAGE January 2017

Implementation Strategy FY Building on a Solid Foundation

Nevada County Health and Human Services FY14 Rural Health Care Services Outreach Grant Project Evaluation Report June 30, 2015

Passport Advantage Provider Manual Section 8.0 Quality Improvement

Unit 4 Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG)

7:30 a.m. 8:05 a.m. Welcome/Introductions and Tips for Success

Ambulatory-care-sensitive admission rates: A key metric in evaluating health plan medicalmanagement effectiveness

The Alberta Pharmacists Practice Model, Implications for Hospital Pharmacists. October 2014

Profile: Integrating the Patient Activation Measure Into Health Coaching to Improve Patient Engagement

Implementation Strategy Addressing Identified Community Health Needs

PERFORMANCE REPORTING & IMPROVEMENT A GLIMPSE AT THE SCC S PERFORMANCE MEASURES & DASHBOARDS AND ONLINE LEARNING CENTER

Draft Covered California Delivery Reform Contract Provisions Comments Welcome and Encouraged

Naples Internal Medicine Associates

Alpert Medical School of Brown University Clinical Psychology Internship Training Program Rotation Description

Behavioral and Mental Health: High-Weighted. Behavioral and Mental Health: Medium-Weighted. Implementation of co-location PCP and MH services

Integration Improves the Odds: Lessons Learned. Monday, December 18 th, 2017

IU Health Goshen CHNA Action Plan:

VHA Preventive Care Program. Clinician/Educator Programs

Alberta Breathes: Proposed Standards for Respiratory Health of Albertans

Stage 2 GP longitudinal placement learning outcomes

A Comprehensive Framework for Patient Safety, Reliability and Clinical Excellence

TSWF Cardiovascular CPG AIM Form User Guide January 2018

Health Home Enrollment System

ROLE OF THE PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT SECTION CHIEF, CONSULTANT, AND ARMY MEDICAL SPECIALIST CORPS OFFICE

UC Irvine Medical Center

6 18 Evaluation and Impact Measurement

Community Health Needs Assessment 2013 Oakwood Heritage Hospital Implementation Strategy

RN Behavioral Health Care Manager in Primary Care Settings

Using Data for Quality Improvement in a Clinical Setting. Wadia Wade Hanna MD, MPH Technical Assistance Consultant Georgia Health Policy Center

Expanding Your Pharmacist Team

December 23, To the community served by St. Charles Redmond:

EVOLENT HEALTH, LLC. Asthma Program Description 2017

CAADS California Association for Adult Day Services

EVOLENT HEALTH, LLC Diabetes Program Description 2018

THE REIMBURSEMENT SHIFT: PREPARING YOUR PRACTICE FOR PATIENT-CENTERED PAYMENT REFORM. November 20, 2015

Managing Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions

Primer on Quality Improvement and Integrating MOC into my Practice. Erik Stratman, MD

For fully insured groups of 100 or more eligible employees. HealthyOutcomes. A fully-integrated health management solution that works for you

Improvement Activities Data Validation Criteria

Clinical Elements of Integration

MERCY HOSPITAL LEBANON COMMUNITY HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PLAN ( )

The Palliative Care Quality Network s Quality Improvement Collaborative. Kara Bischoff, MD PCQN Spring Conference May 13, 2015

Implementation Plan for Needs Identified in Community Health Needs Assessment for

A Path to Self-actualization:

Improvement Activities for ACI Bonus Measures

UNDERSTANDING THE CONTENT OUTLINE/CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Reducing Readmissions: Potential Measurements

Sunshine Health Managed Medical Assistance (MMA) Program

Provider Guide. Medi-Cal Health Homes Program

Quality Measurement Approaches of State Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Programs

Requirements Document for the Blue Quality Physician Program sm Criteria Effective 08/03/2015

Setting Your QI Goals

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Pediatric Patient History

Quality Management (QM) Program AmeriHealth Pennsylvania

CareConcepts Integrating Payor Sponsored Disease Management into Primary Care Practice

Fostering Effective Integration of Behavioral Health and Primary Care in Massachusetts Guidelines. Program Overview and Goal.

FirstHealth Moore Regional Hospital. Implementation Plan

Opportunities for Medicaid-Public Health Collaboration to Achieve Mutual Prevention Goals: Lessons from CDC s 6 18 Initiative

Community Health Needs Assessment Implementation Strategy Adopted by St. Vincent Charity Medical Center Board of Directors on April 5, 2017

Model of Care. Quality Department 2017

Chapter 2 Provider Responsibilities Unit 5: Specialist Basics

Supplementary Online Content

Transcription:

Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense MANUAL FOR FACILITY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CHAMPIONS U. S. Army Medical Command, Clinical Performance Assurance Division, Evidence-Based Practice Section 2748 Worth Road, Suite 26, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6026 https://www.qmo.amedd.army.mil November 2014

I ntroduction: You have been designated as the champion of a clinical practice guideline (CPG) at your institution, a role that brings both clinical and administrative responsibilities. You will find that your clinical expertise lends credibility to the evidence-based processes outlined in the guideline, an expected facet of clinical practice. However, you will also find that your leadership concerning the guideline ranges beyond your clinical practice; in fact, your role as champion supports patient care, administrative leadership and the clinical practice guideline in a new and powerful manner. Your opinions, thoughts, and actions carry great weight in how patient care is accomplished and variation in care delivery is reduced both in the population addressed by the guideline and in other evidence-based activities. Because your leadership is vital to the successful integration of evidence practice guidelines into your local practice culture, this manual was designed as a tool to assist you in your new role. It is a companion to the larger handbook developed by the RAND Corporation, Putting Practice Guidelines to Work in the Department of Defense Medical System. A copy of this handbook can be found on the U. S. Army Medical Command (USAMEDCOM) Quality Management website at https://www.qmo.amedd.army.mil/general%20documents/rand_document_4_01.pdf. B ackground: The Department of Defense (DoD) has committed extensive effort to designing, implementing, and evaluating evidence-based CPGs as a means of improving and standardizing the quality of care provided to its beneficiaries. Since 1998 the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and DoD have worked together to both devise new guidelines and adapt nationally and internationally recognized CPGs to meet the requirements of the military and veterans health care systems. The choice of guidelines established by the VA/DoD Working Group is based on careful consideration of the readiness needs of the military as well as the high-volume, high-cost health conditions treated in medical treatment facilities (MTFs). As of August 2014, 22 guidelines have been completed: Amputation Lower Limb Amputation Upper Limb Asthma Bipolar Disorder Chronic Kidney Disease Chronic Multi-symptom Illness (formerly Medically Unexplained Symptoms) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Concussion/mTBI Diabetes Mellitus Dyslipidemia Hypertension Low Back Pain 2

Management of Major Depressive Disorder Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain Osteoarthritis Overweight and Obesity Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Pregnancy Substance Use Disorders Stroke Rehabilitation Suicide, Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Tobacco Use Cessation The Army Medical Department (AMEDD) has developed and tested a process for implementation of these guidelines, extensively piloted at numerous MTFs across the AMEDD. Lessons learned from those demonstrations have been incorporated into CPG materials, including the RAND handbook. The appointment of a champion for a guideline is one of the first steps in implementation of a VA/DoD CPG. Other team members are chosen to help incorporate evidence-based practice and evaluation mechanisms into patient care delivery. As the team leader, your efforts will focus on group building, educating providers and clinic staff about the importance of evidencebased practice guidelines, and building local ownership of guideline implementation. Your complex mission depends on participation at all levels, from the enthusiastic support of the Commander to full understanding and guideline use on the front lines of patient care. Multiple processes in CPG implementation and evaluation depend on appropriate allocation of resources and communication of leadership expectations for improved patient care outcomes. Getting Started: Putting an adopted guideline into practice is a complex process requiring cooperation, planning, resources, and commitment. While careful organization is required, the process can proceed smoothly with minimal effort. Evaluating current practice and fitting the CPG into process improvement efforts will assist you in implementation and evaluation efforts. Data will show clinical and administrative outcomes. 3

Getting Started: Steps to Guideline Implementation 1. Know the Guideline (CPG) 2. Assess Current MTF Practice Patterns 3. Compare Practice Patterns with CPG Recommendations 4. Identify "Gaps" in MTF Practice Patterns 5. Develop an Action Plan to Close the Gaps 6. Implement the Plan 7. Develop a System to Monitor Practice Change The first step for you and your team is to become familiar with the specific VA/DoD CPG and the evidence that supports it. That knowledge will support your efforts to coalesce as a team, as you will have common goals and information to support your implementation efforts (Know the Guideline). When you come to appreciate the carerelated processes related to the CPG, data concerning those processes and care outcomes will be useful to assess your baseline, or where your MTF is starting as you begin to modify how you deliver evidence-based care (Assess Current Practice). In addition, you will begin to appreciate how your primary care-related processes (e.g., Family Practice, Internal Medicine, Troop Medical Clinics, Pediatric Clinics, and Emergency Rooms) and data compare to those described in the VA/DoD CPG (Compare Practice Patterns with CPG Recommendations). This activity will assist caregivers and administrative staff to learn how your MTF varies from what is perceived as best practice (Identify Gaps). The team can then formulate a plan to address gaps between guideline recommendation and current practices within your MTF (Develop an Action Plan). This plan can form an outline for your presentation to MTF leadership concerning how resources can be allocated to fully embrace evidence-based care. The ultimate aim of every implementation plan is to incorporate CPG recommendations into routine clinical practices at each MTF (Implement the Plan). Institutionalization of the guideline indicates that evidence-based care has become the standard of care. Outcomes can then be tracked periodically using the metrics or indicators (Monitor Practice Change) that have been selected by the Office of the Surgeon General (OTSG) using HEDIS or your facility benchmarks. More detailed information is available in the RAND handbook, Putting Practice Guidelines to Work in the Department of Defense Medical System, Section 2, "Overview of Guideline Implementation and Keys to Success." 4

iiiii II. IMPLEMENTATION I. ADOPTION Establish Leadership Support iiiii Form the Implementation Action Team Develop / Modify Implementation Action Plan Monitor Implementation Progress Implement Small Scale Changes Using PDSA Cycle Extend and Adapt Change III. INSTITUTIONALIZATION As seen in this figure, CPG implementation is an ongoing process. K now The Guideline: VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines are simple and complex. They are simple in that they reflect current evidence-based patient management recommendations in logical, algorithmic steps for providers to follow. Guidelines are complex in that each step is annotated with health care literature citations, providing information concerning the level of evidence supporting each recommendation. Thus complete guidelines are lengthy and quite detailed. Key Points or Key Elements have been developed for each guideline to assist in organizing both implementation and evaluation. All documents are available and downloadable via the QMO website: https://www.qmo.amedd.army.mil, which also links to the VA Office of Quality, Safety and Value web site, https://www.healthquality.va.gov/index.asp. The VA Office of Quality, Safety and Value also has downloadable PDA formats for many of the guidelines. The web-based documents represent the most up to date information available on each guideline. 5

A ssess Current Practice: Data can be gathered using the Military Health System Population Health Portal or electronic health record (i.e., AHLTA) to support the acquisition of baseline performance and ongoing evaluation from within your organization, The champion should also visit each primary care venue and ask all front line caregivers and administrators how care is delivered and how they would perceive process changes to improve the quality and/or efficiency of care. Quantitative and qualitative data, as well as information about existing processes, can supplement your understanding of both the guideline and the environment into which the guideline will be incorporated. Flow charts can be very helpful in understanding current practice. Refer to Putting Practice Guidelines to Work in the Department of Defense Medical System, Section 4, pages 21-25, Planning for Action, for more detailed information. C ompare Practice/Identify Gaps: Identifying addressable gaps and targets for process change are a result of the synthesis of data concerning clinical processes and outcomes. For each of the key guideline points or elements, the team compares existing clinical practices to the standards specified in the guideline. An integral part of this activity is identifying organizational barriers to process modifications. Additional suggestions are present in Putting Practice Guidelines to Work in the Department of Defense Medical System, Section 4, pages 27-28 Planning Step 1: Analyze Gaps Between the Guideline and Current Practice, and pages 29-30, Planning Step 2: Identify Barriers to Successful Implementation. D evelop an Action Plan: After gaps are identified, prioritization and operationalization plans can be formulated by the team, including the development of overall strategy and tactics. A well-defined strategy reflects the populations served by the facility as well as the sizes and configurations of the clinic. The effort is focused on areas in which change is most needed. A specific set of actions is outlined for each planned change and organized into a time line. A critical consideration is how the changes will be introduced into each practice setting. Your professional and personal skill as champion is critical to the successful implementation and the action plan should contain detailed information on how this step is to be accomplished. Building team spirit and commitment in the team is critical to guideline implementation success. Further details can be found in Putting Practice Guidelines to Work in the Department of Defense Medical System, Section 4, pages 31-33 Planning Step 3: Develop an Overall Strategy and Specific Actions. 6

I mplement the Plan: Successfully achieving lasting improvements in clinical outcomes requires more than the enthusiasm and commitment of your guideline team, health care practitioners and MTF leadership. Staff resources and clinical and/or administrative systems may require reorganization. Such change can be supported using the tools of quality improvement and the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) methodology. Small-scale planned actions, followed by assessment and improvement, assist staff in understanding and embracing change. This process is covered in detail in Putting Practice Guidelines to Work in the Department of Defense Medical System, Section 5, pages 37-41, Making Change Happen. Monitor Change: The evaluation stage of process change is critical to sustaining change and being able to communicate its worth. Metrics, chosen in the initial stages of planning for change, are tracked across time to demonstrate the approach to best practice. Data should also be used to pinpoint less than ideal performance and the need for further process change. All stakeholders in the process should be kept apprised of ongoing data collection and analyzed results. This feedback loop is a critical part of completing the change in clinical practice patterns. More detailed information about metric selection, data collection, monitoring and interpretation of your results can be found in Putting Practice Guidelines to Work in the Department of Defense Medical System, Section 4, pages 34-35 Planning Step 4: Guideline Metrics and Monitoring. Summary: This manual is provided as a resource and companion to the more detailed RAND handbook, Putting Practice Guidelines to Work in the Department of Defense Medical System. For further information, contact the Chief of the Office of Evidence-Based Practice, at (210) 466-2915, DSN 471. 7