Constitutive Document Revised JAN 2017

Similar documents
Regional meeting on the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management

Second Workshop for the Stockholm Convention regional and subregional centres 28 September - 2 October 2009 AGENDA

PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. PROJECT LINKAGE TO NATIONAL PRIORITIES, ACTION PLANS AND PROGRAMS

National Dialogue Initiative

PROGRESS REPORT ON THE CAPACITY-BUILDING INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPARENCY

Financing Development, Transfer, and Dissemination of Clean and Environmentally Sound Technologies

USER GUIDE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND GEF PROJECT FINANCING

Challenges and Tasks of Development Cooperation in North-East Asia: KOICA s Partnership towards Post-2015 Development Cooperation

REVIEW OF EIF TRUST FUND MANAGER OPERATING TOOLS AND PROCEDURES

THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL, REGIONAL & SUB-REGIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN SUPPORTING SD IN THE ARAB REGION

Best practices and challenges in supporting MRV in developing countries

See Notes on Agenda Items, following pages.

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE. Adaptable Program Loan P F-Financial Intermediary Assessment 08-May Nov-2012

GEF s Role and Activities for Climate Change Mitigation

Climate Investment Funds: Financing Low-Emissions and Climate-Resilient Activities

Disaster Management Structures in the Caribbean Mônica Zaccarelli Davoli 3

REPORT 2015/189 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

April 2007 CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT AND LINKAGES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN AFRICA

F I S C A L Y E A R S

Fee Structure for Agencies: Part I

February Report of the GEF to the FIFTH Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants

DECISION B.14/10 DECISION B.14/11

Promote and strengthen international collaboration to reduce road traffic injuries. Preamble

Transforming Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining in Africa through Research and Training

Introduction to the Green Climate Fund Florence RICHARD, Regional Advisor Africa

Progress Report on Decision 7 Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP)

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Project Consultant - 9th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference. for

LEADERS. transformational. A community of FOR A LOW EMISSION RESILIENT DEVELOPMENT IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN. People transforming development

HEALTH SYSTEMS FUNDING PLATFORM - WORK PLAN OCTOBER 2010 JUNE 2011 BACKGROUND

Updated Proposal by Brazil and France as co-chairs of the REDD+ Partnership:

Cities Alliance: Standard Operating Procedures

Terms of Reference Approved 30 April 2015/ Revised 29 September 2016

DECISION B.14/10 DECISION B.14/11

Framework Convention on Climate Change

Ethiopia: FCPF Readiness Grant FCPFR - FOREST CARBON PARTNERSHIP FACILITY

Korea s Development Cooperation Policy

Funds Mobilization Guide/Introduction

United Nations Development Program in Georgia (UNDP) Project: Fostering Regional and Local Development in Georgia. Small Grant Scheme (SGS)

Terms of Reference. International Consultant GEF Project Development Specialist

Lessons learnt from fast-start finance

Grantee Operating Manual

Fiduciary Arrangements for Grant Recipients

The C40 Cities Finance Facility Information pack for cities

AWARDING FIXED OBLIGATION GRANTS TO NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS

IMCI. information. Integrated Management of Childhood Illness: Global status of implementation. June Overview

European Conference Research and Regulatory Activities Establish GSA Promotion Working Group

United Nations Environment Programme

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. Strategy on Environmental Justice

PMR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION STATUS REPORT (ISR) MEXICO

Project Information Document/ Identification/Concept Stage (PID)

FRAMEWORK OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES THE DEDICATED GRANT MECHANISM FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES (DGM)

Procedure: PR/IN/04 May 21,2012. Procedure: Accreditation of GEF Project Agencies

SGP. Small Grants Programme (GEF SGP) Global Environment Facility SOUTH AFRICA. implemented by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

TERMS OF REFERENCE CONSULTANCY TO CONDUCT A TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT ON HEALTHCARE WASTE MANAGMENT IN SELECTED HEALTH FACILITIES.

The hallmarks of the Global Community Engagement and Resilience Fund (GCERF) Core Funding Mechanism (CFM) are:

Municipal Solid Waste Financing Structures PROFESSOR JEREMY GORELICK CENTER FOR CLEAN AIR POLICY (CCAP) SOLID WASTE WORKSHOP 24 APRIL 2017

United Nations Asia-Pacific Regional Coordination Mechanism Terms of Reference

3. Where have we come from and what have we done so far?

PARIS21 Secretariat. Accelerated Data Program (ADP) DGF Final Report

THE GEF SMALL GRANTS PROGRAMME COMMUNITY ACTION GLOBAL IMPACT

EU-CELAC Joint Initiative on Research and Innovation (JIRI) VI Senior Official Meeting (SOM) on Science and Technology. Brussels, 14 th March 2017

Ministerial declaration of the high-level segment submitted by the President of the Council

GUIDELINES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT POLICY

IFCS CHAMPION. Children and Chemical Safety. Report on Activities. May 2006

JOINT SUMMARY OF THE CHAIRS 49 TH GEF COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 20 22, 2015

The GEF. Was established in October 1991 as a $1 billion pilot program in the World Bank

Global Climate Funds. The Climate Investment Funds and the Green Climate Fund CLIFFORD POLYCARP

The 10YFP Sustainable Tourism Programme:

ANALYSIS OF FIRST DISBURSEMENT

1Identification and. Formulation of Projects. Identification, Formulation and Planning. Chapter 1. Outline of JICA Activities

A/58/320. General Assembly. United Nations

TABLE OF CONTENTS I.INTRODUCTION 2 II.PROGRESS UPDATE 4 III.FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 7 IV. MOBILIZATION OF RESOURCES 11 V. OUTLOOK FOR

SAICM/Health.1/3. I. Opening. Distr.: General 15 March English only

Progress of Expert Working Group on ESM (EWG)

Financial Innovation Challenge Fund General and Government to Person Payments Round Guidelines

UNIDO s Trade Capacity Building Programme

Fact sheet on elections and membership

TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR CONTRACTS FOR RECP ASSESSMENTS AND SERVICES, IN MYANMAR. 19 October 2017

POLICY BRIEF. Enhancing direct access to the Green Climate Fund. Key messages. Introduction. Direct access and enhanced direct access:

Workstream III: Operational Modalities Sub-workstream III.2: Managing Finance Background note: Thematic windows

Date: November Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund 2014 First Allocation Guidelines on Process

Cities Alliance: Standard Operating Procedures

The health workforce: advances in responding to shortages and migration, and in preparing for emerging needs

INTERNATIONAL FINANCE BRIEFING NOTE

Topical Peer Review 2017 Ageing Management of Nuclear Power Plants

Prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases

GRANT APPLICATION GUIDELINES. Global Call for Proposals

and Commission on the amended Energy Efficiency Directive and Renewable Energies Directives. Page 1

AID FOR TRADE EXPERT DIALOGUE BANGKOK, 18 th Nov Case study: Bangladesh Presented by: Mohammad Farhad Bangladesh Foreign Trade Institute

THE GREEN CLIMATE FUND AND NATIONAL CLIMATE PLEDGES LEADING TO PARIS Ned Helme, President

International Peer-Learning Workshop. Call for Expression of Interest

Secretariat. United Nations ST/SGB/2006/10. Secretary-General s bulletin. Establishment and operation of the Central Emergency Response Fund

Executive Summary. Introduction. scale up innovation to build inclusive and green value chains,

United Nations Development Programme ISTANBUL INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR PRIVATE SECTOR IN DEVELOPMENT

ANNOTATED PROVISIONAL AGENDA I. INTRODUCTION. A. Background. B. Purpose and objectives

Your response to this survey is strictly anonymous and will remain secure.

Governance and Implementation Mechanisms of ASEAN Post-2015 Health Development Agenda

West Africa Regional Office (founded in 2010)

United Nations/India Workshop

Consideration of funding proposals

Transcription:

Constitutive Document Revised JAN 2017 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Vision... 2 Objectives... 2 Membership... 3 Governance Structure... 5 I. Executive Committee.... 5 II. Secretariat... 6 III. Technical Advisory Group.... 6 Resource Requirements... 7 Other Considerations... 7

Introduction Partnering for solutions to pollution problems The number of people at risk from chemicals, wastes and toxic pollution globally is well in excess of 100 million, making it a global public health problem of scale. 1 The vast majority of this impact falls on low- and middle-income countries the countries least equipped with the capacity and resources to solve these problems and in locations with extreme poverty. Without intervention and cleanup, toxin pollution poses real long-term health and environmental problems. It can significantly impede economic and social development, as well as achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The Global Alliance on Health and Pollution (GAHP) seeks to address the problem of chemicals, waste and toxic pollution in low-and middle-income countries, specifically to reduce the harmful effects of toxins on public health. The GAHP is a collaborative body that facilitates the provision of technical and financial resources to governments and communities to reduce the impacts of pollution on health in low- and middle-income countries. This document, created in collaboration with more than 10 different agencies, defines the structure and focus of GAHP, as well as logistical, management, and financing options within the current context of country programs and international agencies. It is intended to serve as a constitutive document for GAHP. Relevant supplemental information is included in the attached Addendums (Legacy Pollution and Public Health A Brief Review, and A Methodology for Site Evaluation and Response). Vision The vision of GAHP is a world where the health of present and future generations, especially children and pregnant women, is safe from toxic pollution. GAHP is a collaborative body that facilitates the provision of technical and financial resources to governments and communities to reduce the impacts of pollution on health in low- and middle-income countries. Objectives GAHP: Advocates for solutions that address pollution broadly indoor and outdoor air, wastewater, and contaminated soils and water; Initiates activities that reduce adverse health impacts caused by contaminated sites; 1 This estimate includes polluted sites that are solely legacy, solely active or both legacy and active in nature.

Works to help actively polluting small-scale industries and activities move to cleaner production practices; Measures project performance based on health and economic outcomes. GAHP will do this by: Forming a mechanism through which funding and technical expertise are channeled or facilitated to low- and middle-income countries to address chemicals, wastes and toxic pollution. 2 Serving as a global hub and network for low- and middle-income countries for existing and new information, data and expertise on chemicals, wastes and pollution, remediation models, clean-up techniques, and solutions and standards for implementation and strategies to address pollution at a national level; and Including bilateral government agencies, multilateral development banks, international organizations, low- and middle-income country governments, the private sector companies/associations and civil society organizations; Membership Based on current development priorities and agendas, key stakeholders who have taken concrete action and shown leadership in resolving the issues of toxic pollution and/or are interested to form an international response are invited to participate in the GAHP. Inclusion of members who are working on existing parallel initiatives, such as SAICM, Africa Stockpiles Project, the Stockholm and Basel conventions, the UNEP-led Chemicals Financing initiative for those Conventions and the Global Mercury Partnership are important not only in order to ensure coordination and eliminate duplication of effort, but also to minimize overlooking thematic areas which have historically received relatively little attention (e.g. artisanal/livelihood related pollution, emergency or pollution disaster mitigation and prevention, legacy pollution). Currently GAHP Members include, but are not limited to (in alphabetical order): the Asian Development Bank (ADB); the European Commission (EC), Chilean NGO Fundación Chile, the Cyrus R. Vance Center for International Justice, the German Federal Ministry of the Environment (BMUB), the German Agency for International Cooperation (Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Internationale Zusammenarbeit - GIZ), Indonesian NGO Komite Penghapusan Bensin Bertimbel (KPBB); the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the Ministries of Environment from the Governments of Cameroon, Ghana, Indonesia, Madagascar, Mali, Mexico, Peru, the Philippines, Senegal, Togo, Uruguay, the City of Montevideo and the City of Buenos Aires; the Ministry of Health of Tajikistan, Pure Earth (formerly the Blacksmith Institute); the Suez Canal University, Children's Environmental Health Center of the Icahn 2 Potential financing mechanism options are presented in the addendum.

School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, the UN Development Program (UNDP), the UN Environment Program (UNEP); the UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO); and the World Bank (WB). A full list of members can be found at http://www.gahp.net/new/what-isgahp/members/. Organizations interested in observing the GAHP, include but are not limited to (in alphabetical order): Australian Aid (AusAid), Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), City University of New York Hunter College, the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Ministries of Environment from the Governments of India and Uruguay, the International Council of Chemicals Associations (ICCA), the International Lead Management Center (ILMC), Japanese International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the Norwegian Ministry of Environment, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), US Department of Treasury (US DoT), the US Department of State (US DoS), the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM), the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). The World Bank through its Development Grant Facility and the European Commission allocated resources from 2012-2014 to initiate GAHP. The roles and responsibilities of GAHP members will vary from organization to organization, depending on the mandate and modus operandi of each. Broadly, it is expected that GAHP members will contribute one or more of the following: Sharing knowledge and experience that may be pertinent to GAHP objectives; Promoting the issue of legacy pollution at appropriate occasions and venues (conferences, meetings, seminars); Providing technical assistance, as may be needed, in activities supported by GAHP; Exploring options for mobilizing financial assistance for clean-up projects in lowincome countries and for dealing with emergencies; and Actively participate in the GAHP annual meeting, the Executive Committee and/or Technical Advisory Group. The following process to accept new members to the GAHP is proposed: 1. Government agencies (whether national or local), bilateral/multilateral donor agencies, and international organizations under the United Nations are key. Their membership requires an official letter or email stating intent to join. The GAHP Secretariat can confirm membership without Executive Committee approval. 2. Other organizations, such as NGOs, academia or industry groups may also join provided their missions and/or expertise/experience are relevant and their activities support GAHP s objectives. The GAHP Secretariat is responsible for conducting due diligence to confirm the applicant s intent, relevance and contribution to GAHP objectives. The Secretariat will submit names and supporting information regarding potential new nongovernmental members for approval by the Executive Committee.

Governance Structure The Global Alliance on Health and Pollution (GAHP) is comprised of an Executive Committee, a Secretariat and a Technical Advisory Group. Roles of each are defined for the design phase and additional responsibilities during the implementation phase. I. Executive Committee. The Executive Committee will: Provide leadership and strategic direction to GAHP activities in developing an international response to legacy pollution in low- and middle-income countries, particularly with regards to what type of mechanism would be best able to deliver training, capacity and/or remediation support, and how it would be managed, implemented and financed; Provide administrative and fiduciary oversight, including review and approval of annual operations, expenditures, audits and evaluations (at least until a formal mechanism is established); Approve GAHP strategies, policies, annual workplan and fundraising plan; Coordinate with GAHP members and ensure that the deliverables of the Secretariat (see below) are consistent with members broader development objectives; Assist with raising/mobilizing technical and financial resources for the mechanism and Secretariat; Review and approve terms of reference for the governance structure, Secretariat and Advisory Group and additional members to the GAHP. The Executive Committee is comprised of nine representatives. Currently there are 8 members: one representative each from the Asian Development Bank, the World Bank, Pure Earth, UNIDO, the European Commission (EC), the German Federal Ministry of the Environment (BMUB), the Ministry of Environment and Forests of Madagascar, and the Department of the Environment and Natural Resources of the Philippines. Representatives from an additional lowand middle-income countries will be nominated. The World Bank will chair the Executive Committee for the first three years. Decisions taken by the Executive Committee require consensus. Quorum will be five representatives. Executive Committee member organizations are not required to make a financial contribution in order to participate. The Executive Committee will convene quarterly via tele/videoconference or in person, at events such as the WB Annual meeting (which may also serve as a venue for GAHP annual meeting) or an independent venue pending availability of resources. The Executive Committee will convene more often if necessary. During the implementation phase (up until incorporation), the Executive Committee role would remain one of strategy and guidance. It will also review and approve pilot implementation

projects to test the design of the GAHP and future projects pending availability of resources. Depending on the mechanism chosen for incorporation, some or all of functions of the Executive Committee will be incorporated into the mechanism (in the case of a Trust Fund housed at the World Bank, which would then take on administrative and fiduciary oversight) or transferred to the Secretariat. II. Secretariat Under the leadership and direction of the Executive Committee, the Secretariat will: Develop the design and structure of the GAHP in coordination with GAHP members Implement GAHP activities in accordance with Executive Committee decisions; Develop annual work plans, expenditure schedules, selection criteria for pilot projects to test the design of the GAHP, and nomination and selection criteria for Technical Advisory Group members (for approval by Executive Committee). Explore long-term financing options and develop a fund mobilization plan; and Evaluate progress and compile programmatic and financial reports of GAHP activities. In addition, as relevant, the Secretariat will: Review grant applications; Coordinate and manage grant implementation, including disbursement of funds; Conduct performance-based monitoring and evaluation of projects; and Manage global information and outreach on the program, standards, models, lessons learned. Pending continued availability of resources, Pure Earth will serve as the interim Secretariat for the GAHP. In due course, the Executive Committee will determine a permanent arrangement for the Secretariat for the Implementation Phase (i.e. hosted at Pure Earth or other institution). III. Technical Advisory Group. The Technical Advisory Group will provide guidance and expertise to the policies and operations of the GAHP, specifically for technical components. The Technical Advisory Group will be comprised of a diverse set of 15-25 technical experts in the fields of toxic pollution, environmental health and other relevant and cross cutting fields. At least five members of the group will be from low- and middle-income counties. Executive Committee members may nominate experts, although they will be different individuals than those assigned to the Executive Committee. The Advisory Group will be modeled after Pure Earth s Technical Advisory Group, and will be largely comprised of volunteers. It will convene twice a year via teleconference, or more often as required. The Technical Advisory Group will also be involved in the proposal review and selection process, as well as in conducting monitoring and evaluation of projects. Provided there is no

conflict of interest, technical advisors may participate on specific projects to provide key technical expertise. Resource Requirements The initial three years of the GAHP, including work leading up to its establishment (such as collection of data on toxic hotspots and human health, research, raising awareness etc), were partially funded by the World Bank and the European Commission. The Rockefeller Foundation donated its Bellagio Center conference space for the first face-to-face meeting at Bellagio, Italy in July 2012. GAHP members will work to coordinate their existing resources as best possible to assist in the GAHP agenda. Members will also begin efforts to find sustainable financing for GAHP activities. The WB, pending approval, will act as a host for a future multilateral donor trust fund. Until new resources are raised, the current structure will suffice to implement GAHP activities. If a financial mechanism is selected, additional resources will be needed for implementation. However, this will not just be a need for pure funding for remediation projects. Significant amounts of technical expertise and in-kind contributions will also be needed to enable a response that can tackle these issues at scale. In-kind contributions from recipient country governments and GAHP members, such as allocation of staff time, facilities for meetings, workshops and conferences, and the like will be invaluable. Likewise, technical experts from agencies around the world with specific knowledge and expertise in remediation, policy, capacity building, sustainable development, occupational health, communications and many other areas will be required at scale. A mobilization plan to obtain these funds and non-cash resources for support of the GAHP, and the international response, including implementation of remediation projects, will be developed by the Secretariat. Other Considerations Results-based Management, Monitoring and Evaluation A results-based management system will be designed with clear indicators to track results. Reference the GAHP 2015-2020 Strategic Plan for more detail. Environmental and Social Safeguards World Bank environmental, social and other safeguard policies will apply with full rigor to projects implemented under GAHP. However, it is not expected that projects under GAHP will incur penalties under those standards and policies because: 1) They will improve the environment; 2) Relocation of populations will be an exception, rather than a rule; and 3).

Because women and children are most vulnerable to the effects of toxic pollution, remediation health education and awareness raising interventions must naturally focus on women and children. Projects that incorporate handling, transportation and/or disposal of hazardous waste, will follow standards and protocols set by the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), World Health Organization or World Bank. Fiduciary Standards The GAHP will follow standard accounting and financial management standards. Pure Earth accounting procedures have been approved by the World Bank for the purpose of the DGF grant, and conform to generally accepted accounting principles. If a financial mechanism is chosen as part of the international response, it will also adhere to standard accounting principles. This will ensure that assets are safeguarded, that financial statements are prepared and audited and that finances are managed with responsible stewardship.