TOKYO MOU MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION Non Profit Organization Consist of 18 Member Of Maritime Authorities In Asia Pacific Region
MEMBERSHIP OF THE MEMORANDUM Qualitative Criteria Subscribe to the commitment to the MOU Sufficient capacity of being Flag State Sufficient capacity of being Port State Established connection to APCIS Signed a financial agreement and pay contribution
Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control In The Asia Pacific Region TOKYO MOU
COOPRATIVE MEMBERSHIP Marshall Island ( accepted in 2011) Peru (Accepted in 2013 Cambodia ( state is interested until today no formal application made)
OBJECTIVE Is to establish an effective port State control regime in the Asia-Pacific region through cooperation of its members and harmonization of their activities, to eliminate substandard shipping to promote maritime safety, to protect the marine environment and to safeguard working and living conditions on board
RESPONSIBILITY AND OBLIGATION Avoid inspection which has been inspected by other Authorities within the previous 6 months Inspection carried out by Qualified and Competent PSCOs Endeavour to secure the rectification of deficiencies found If deficiencies cannot be rectified at Port f inspection Authorities may allowed ship sail in accordance of Tokyo MOU procedures to port where deficiencies can rectified. Shall also notify the authority where ship to call If inspection found to be vessel substandard authority may suspend the inspection
RELEVENT INSTRUMENT FOR PSC SOLAS-74-Protocol 78-88 MARPOL 73/78 Load Line 1966- Protocol 88 STCW-78 Col Reg-72 Tonnage 69 ILO 147 MLC 2006
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE Committee composed of representatives of each of the Member Authorities Technical Working Group Comprises of each of the Member Authorities Secretariat
SHIP TARGETING CRITERIA Element Ship age Ship type Ship Flag Deficiencies Classification society Outstanding deficiencies Time since last inspection Targeting System 0-5: 0, 6-10:5, 11 15:10, 16-20: 10 + 1/year, > 20:15 + 2/year 4:for ships oil/chemical tanker, Bulk Carrier, Ro-Ro Cargo& Passenger,General Cargo, Passenger with age >15 year of age or more 1 for each percentage points in excess of 3 year rolling period 0.6 for each deficiency found during last 4 inspection 10 for non IACS 2 for each outstanding deficiency 6-12 months: 3,12-24 months: 6, over 24 months & new ships 50
SELECTION OF SHIP Risk Point Priority Very High > 100 1 High 41-100 2 Medium 11-40 3 Low 0-10 4
INSPECTION ON ISPS COMPLIANCE Access control and monitoring made by ship personnel Valid ISSC certificate SSO holding certificate of proficiency Master aware security level of ports and complying with that level Check security Drills records Check The records of last 10 calls at Port Facilities Key member can communicate effective on implementation of security
DETAINABLE DEFICIENCY ON SECURITY No access control and effective monitoring No valid ISSC SSO didn t hold Security proficiency certificate No security drills carried out No proper records of last 10 ports call kept Subsequent Interim ISSC issued ( not more then 6 months)
2011 STATISTIC Number Of Inspection Bumber of Inspection with security related deficiencies Number of security related deficiencies No of security related detention Dentention percentage ( %) 30,929 2,033 2490 33 0.11 Common deficiencies are no access control and monitoring Subsequent Interim ISSC No drill carried out No records of last 10 calls
APCIS Asia Pacific Computer Inspection System - Port State Control Inspection Database - Ship Targeting System for selection of ship for PSV Inspection - provide effective information exchange facilities regarding port State control in the region.
TOKYO MOU WEB PAGE
INFORMATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS Under Performing Vessel Detention List PSC database
PSC DATABASE
PSC DATABASE
ON LINE DETENTION LIST
IMO Number CallSign UNDER PERFORMING VESSEL Number Detention Ship name at the time Detention Date and Last Port Of Inspection Flag Company IMO numbers ISM DOC issuing ROs
EQUASIS
SEARCH BY SHIP INFOMATION
SEARCH COMPANY INFO
NEW INSPECTION REGIME
CRITERIA Flag State performance -The Black, Grey and White list for flag State performance is established annually taking account of the inspection and detention history over the preceding three calendar years and is adopted by the Tokyo MOU Committee as published in the Annual Report VIMSAS Audit- report By Flag State RO -Recognized Organizations of Tokyo MOU are those recognized by at least one member Authority of the Tokyo MOU, The performance of all Recognized Organizations is established annually taking account of the inspection and detention history over the preceding three calendar years and is adopted by the Tokyo MOU Committee as published in the Annual Report
CRITERIA Flag State performance -The Black, Grey and White list for flag State performance is established annually taking account of the inspection and detention history over the preceding three calendar years and is adopted by the Tokyo MOU Committee as published in the Annual Report VIMSAS Audit- report By Flag State RO -Recognized Organizations of Tokyo MOU are those recognized by at least one member Authority of the Tokyo MOU, The performance of all Recognized Organizations is established annually taking account of the inspection and detention history over the preceding three calendar years and is adopted by the Tokyo MOU Committee as published in the Annual Report
COMPANY PERFROMANCE
Thank You For Your Attention Thank You