ACTION Registry-GWTG NCDR13 Updates 500000 450000 400000 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 ACTION Cumulative Records Submitted 457970 327168 219151 138117 83446 2008 Q3 2009 Q3 2010 Q3 2011 Q3 2012 Q3 Records Submitted ACTION Registry-GWTG Records Submitted by Quarter 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 18,933 18,389 19,059 21,170 20,905 23,106 23,475 24,829 25,058 26,797 28,302 5,000 0 2,357 2,801 3,464 4,590 4,471 4,823 5,477 6,382 6,021 6,485 6,928 Q1 2010 Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Limited Records Premier Records 1
ACTION Registry-GWTG Records Submitted by Diagnosis 40000 35000 30000 26,724 27,929 28,952 31,211 31,079 33,282 35,230 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 21,513 20,370 18991 19,135 19,055 16,372 16,969 17,688 14629 11611 8868 10,352 10,960 11,264 12,076 12,912 13,717 12,024 7380 5761 Q1 2009 Q1 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Total Records Non-STEMI STEMI 1000 Registry Updates 800 600 400 200 0 810 575 640 656 680 300 175 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Enrolled Participants Composite Measures All Registry Patients R4Q ACTION Registry-GWTG DATA: July 01, 2011 - June 30, 2012 2
Data Quality Update Completed Pilot audit In the process of completing adjudication for 2010 and 2011 61 hospitals audited/year 330 records/year 63 Premier elements 57 Limited elements ACTION Registry-GWTG Abstracts and Publications 40 Total manuscripts published 2012: 12 Manuscripts published 2 Manuscripts in 2013 2012: 14 Abstracts submitted 4 Abstracts in 2013 ACTION Research Linking ACTION records to CathPCI records Future blended reporting for both registries Linking ACTION records CMS records with Yale CMS records with DCRI CERTs funded 3
Reporting AMI 30 day mortality measures developed using ACTION Risk adjustment Incorporation of ACTION measures into voluntary hospital public reporting program Physician identifiers added to the data set. New ACTION version Ticagrelor EMS 1 st medical contact Reperfusion therapy documentation for the Limited users UFH elements and the excessive dosing report Inline with the new integrated platform Updating Performance Measures and Metrics To reduce risk standardized 30- day mortality rates for patients hospitalized with AMI by 20% by December 2016 4
Survival after Acute Myocardial Infarction Study To identify hospital-level factors that may be associated with better performance in AMI care as measured by RSMR REGIONAL SYSTEMS OF CARE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: MISSION: LIFELINE STEMI SYSTEMS ACCELERATOR Objectives of the Demonstration Project Establish a regional standard of emergency cardiovascular care that includes every hospital and EMS agency Lower cardiovascular mortality by broadly improving the timely treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients Create a sustainable system for treating cardiovascular emergencies including STEMI, cardiac arrest, stroke and aortic dissection. 5
3/22/2013 2010, American Heart Association 16 6
Voluntary Hospital Public Reporting: PCI Readmission Collaboration between: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services The American College of Cardiology Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation Disclosure Salary support under contract with CMS to support the development of outcomes measures Salary support from contract with ACC to provide data analytic services 2 Voluntary Public Reporting CMS, ACC, and YNHH collaborating to provide participating hospitals with information about readmissions following PCI Voluntary effort Hospital specific reports available March 2013 Separate tab on the NCDR dashboard Decision whether to share results on Hospital Compare website in April Data on Hospital Compare in July 3 1
100 50 0 3/22/2013 Why Measure PCI Readmission? National focus on reducing readmissions Increasing evidence that hospitals can reduce readmission rates Project RED, BOOST, Care Transitions Readmissions after PCI are a major driver of cost to the health care system 1 in 7 PCI patients readmitted within 30 days MEDPAC Report Readmission rates vary significantly across hospitals 4 Unplanned Readmissions Following PCI Distribution of RSRR (2007).08.1.12.14.16 Risk Standardized Readmission Rates (RSRR) Goals of Voluntary Public Reporting Inform health care providers about opportunities to improve care Provide information to the public on unplanned readmissions after PCI procedures No additional burden to hospitals Promote investment in quality improvement initiatives 6 2
PCI Readmission Measure Outcome: Unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge Identified using Medicare administrative claims data Risk Adjustment: CathPCI Registry data Accounts for characteristics and comorbidities Reported as hospital-level, risk-standardized readmission rate (RSRR) 7 PCI procedures: Inclusion Criteria Medicare fee-for-service patients age 65 At participating CathPCI Registry hospitals Discharged between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2011 Appear in both the CathPCI Registry data and Medicare claims data 8 Opportunity for Improvement CathPCI Registry unadjusted readmission rate: 11.7% Distribution of CathPCI Registry Hospital 30-Day Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates following PCI (2010-2011) RSRR ranges from 8.49% to 16.65% 9 3
Preview Period Educate hospitals about measure in advance of voluntary public reporting Provide hospitals with their results in context of all participating hospitals Help hospitals understand results Provide information on how to participate in voluntary public reporting 10 Preview Period Overview Hospitals will receive: CathPCI Registry Results Summary and Data File Instructions Hospital-specific Data and Results Excel File Publicly available resources: 2009 Technical Report 2013 Measure Updates FAQs, data release consent forms 11 Example: PCI Readmission Results CathPCI Registry and Your Hospital s Results on the 30-Day PCI Readmission Measure for the 2010-2011 Reporting Period **DO NOT TRANSMIT THIS FILE** This file contains personally identifiable information. Number of Number of Number of Number of Your Your Your Unadjusted Hospitals Hospitals No Hospitals CathPCI Your CathPCI Hospital's Hospital's Hospital's CathPCI Better than Different than Worse than Registry Hospital's Registry Eligible Unadjusted RSRR (Lower Registry CathPCI CathPCI CathPCI Hospitals Comparative Hospitals with Patient Stays Readmission 95% CI, Upper Readmission Registry Registry Registry Included in Performance too few cases (#) Rate 95% CI) Rate Readmission Readmission Readmission Measure (<25) Rate Rate Rate No different than CathPCI Registry rate 50 12.0% 11.5% 11.7% 19 1037 28 113 1197 This data is for demonstration only 12 4
Example: Patient Stay Information Your Hospital's Detailed Patient Stay Information for Readmissions Following PCI for the 2010-2011 Reporting Period **DO NOT TRANSMIT THIS FILE OR ANY OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS TABLE** This file contains personally identifiable information. If you have questions about the information provided below, please refer to Excel row numbers. Date of NCDR Patient Date of Index Discharge for ID Procedure Index Procedure Principal Discharge Date of Date of Readmission Diagnosis for Admission for Discharge for Type Readmission Readmission Readmission (ICD-9-CM Code) Readmitted to your Hospital CCN of Readmitting Hospital HOSPITAL COMPARE 14 Hospital Compare Display Will appear on the Hospital Spotlight Will also appear in search results 15 5
Hospital Compare Display ACC will have its own header similar to this one Link to PCI Readmission results table would appear under the header along with a brief description of the measure 16 Example: Hospital Compare Data Table Hospital 30-Day Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) CCN State Hospital Name Performance Compared to CathPCI Registry Risk-Standardized Readmission Rate Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI 123456 AL General Hospital No different than 11.25% 8.50% 14.00% 222222 CT Community Hospital Better than 7.10% 5.00% 8.01% 111111 CT Memorial Hospital No different 11.00% 8.90% 12.40% 333333 TN City Hospital Worse than 14.00% 13.04% 15.46% 444444 CO Government Hospital Number of cases too small N/A N/A N/A 555555 CO University Hospital Number of cases too small N/A N/A N/A 456789 GA Research Hospital Number of cases too small N/A N/A N/A 234567 AZ Specialty Hospital Not Publicly Available N/A N/A N/A 567891 ME Rural Hospital Not Publicly Available N/A N/A N/A Note: This data is fictitious. For demonstration only. 17 Important Dates 2009 Measure developed by CMS and CORE 2011 Measure approved by NQF October 2012 CMS and CORE contract with ACC to implement voluntary public reporting March 18, 2013 Preview reports available April 19, 2013 Last opportunity to submit form for July Hospital Compare posting July 2013 Results published on Hospital Compare 18 6
Thanks! 19 Top 10 Planned Readmissions (With stent) Procedure CCS Procedure Description Number of Planned Procedures 45 Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) 2161 48 Top 10 Planned Procedures among Planned Readmissions Following PCI Discharge in 2010 (with stent) Insertion; revision; replacement; removal of cardiac pacemaker or cardioverter/defibrillator 44 Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) 300 49 Other OR heart procedures 126 62 Other diagnostic cardiovascular procedures 120 59 Other OR procedures on vessels of head and neck 102 51 Endarterectomy; vessel of head and neck 98 157 Amputation of lower extremity 55 52 Aortic resection; replacement or anastomosis 55 43 Heart valve procedures 48 477 7
The ICD Registry Improving Quality Care Mark S. Kremers MD, FACC, FHRS MidCarolina Cardiology Charlotte, NC Steering Committee Chairman The following relationships exist related to this presentation: Equity investment Boston Scientific <$10,000 Consultant- Medtronic Investigator- SJM/Medtronic/Boston Scientific ICD Registry 80% submit all patients 1
ICD Sites 1,700 plus facilities ICD Registry Over 950,000 records 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 Records Submitted 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Premier Limited Total ICD Registry 1,000,000 999,999 2
ICD Registry 2013 Your Center Here Ten million Thanks Some month 2013 ICD Registry Research Pipeline 31 published For a complete list of publications, please visit the Research and Publications page: https://www.ncdr.com/webncdr/research/researcha ndpublications 3
2013 Abstracts ACC 2013 Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in the Elderly Cardiac Perforation from ICD lead placement and In- Hospital Adverse Events and Mortality. Insights from NCDR Building a Risk Model from the NCDR ICD Registry for in hospital adverse outcomes following ICD implant Heidenreich Hsu Dodson Poster Oral Poster 2013 Abstracts Rates and Predictors of ICD Infection in 201,836 Medicare Patients: Results from the NCDR Prutkin HRS 2013 Oral Coronary Sinus Dissection from CRT Implantation and Associated In-Hospital Adverse Events. Insights from NCDR Hsu Poster Weekend and Afternoon / Evening ICD Implant Procedures are Associated with Increased Adverse Events and Mortality. Insights from NCDR Hsu Oral Degree of Utilization of ICD Remote Patient Monitoring and Determinants of Activation Akar Poster Guidelines 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update of the 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities 8 new CRT recommendations New metrics to be implemented into the Executive Summary JACC Vol. 60, No. 14, October 2, 2012 4
ICD Implant Risk Model ICD Complications Risk Model Developed by Yale CORE analytic center Risk-standardized complications metric in development NQF endorsed To be implemented into the Executive Summary Appropriate Use Criteria JACC Vol 61, No. 12, February 28, 2013 235 Clinical scenarios 369 Distinct situations New rating terminology applied: o Appropriate - Median Score 7-9 o May Be Appropriate - Median Score 4-6 o Rarely Appropriate - Median Score 1-3 Mapping to DCT and development of future metrics in process Reimbursement and Disclaimer It is the intent of this document to address good medical practice, independent of reimbursement. Some of the scenarios that are deemed Appropriate by the appropriate use criteria may not currently qualify for insurance coverage. For patients, physicians, and insurers, these distinctions are of critical importance because commitment to patient-centered care may warrant implantation of a device appropriate for the individual patient s situation, but it may not fit precisely into a covered indication as defined by coverage policy and requires use of best clinical judgment. Journal of the American College of Cardiology; Vol. 61, No. 12, February 28, 2013 5
Disclaimer Appropriate criteria not guaranteed to be funded Appropriate criteria not a defense against Medicare fraud if not in NCD. Appropriate criteria not synonymous with mandatory In summary: Good clinical judgment and caution still required FINI???? 6
The PINNACLE Outpatient Registry Growing in Size, Growing in Value Introduction to PINNACLE outpatient registry Founding Principles Vital CV care doesn t stop at the hospital door; most care delivered in outpatient setting Better adherence to outpatient guidelines improves patient outcomes and reduces hospital readmissions First national ambulatory quality improvement (QI) registry Covering Four CV Conditions: 1. Coronary Artery Disease 2. Heart Failure 3. Atrial Fibrillation 4. Hypertension 1
In Millions 3/22/2013 Thousands of your colleagues use PINNACLE Over 2,000 providers submit data from 663 office locations Driving continued registry growth for true national benchmarks 8 7 7.71 million encounters covering 2 million unique patients now in the registry 6 5.93 6.21 6.53 6.82 5 5.09 5.21 5.38 4 3 2.94 3.23 3.41 3.69 4.28 4.46 Visits Patients 2 2.49 1 0 1.86 1.91 0.62 0.63 0.82 0.88 1.02 1.1 1.17 1.31 1.33 1.48 1.51 1.52 1.66 1.72 1.78 1.85 Let s talk about data collection Increasing data completeness while minimizing workflow impact 2
All new practices submit data to PINNACLE electronically 1. Data mapping and extraction from your electronic health 2. Prospective data collection from a certified EHR system 3. Web-based data collection form PINNACLE Registry Benefits Rooted in established care guidelines Use of registry data to identify gaps in care Regular performance feedback Measure adherence reports at the institution, care delivery site, and individual provider levels Submit for PQRS and erx Electronic data collection Data-driven education programs and other applied uses of data Customized Physician-Level Reporting and Tools PINNACLE Dashboard Drill Down Reports 3
Using PINNACLE for PQRS and erx 885 providers reported 2012 PQRS 0.5% incentive 573 providers reported 2012 erx 1% incentive PINNACLE is a CMS-qualified EHR Data Submission Vendor Penalties begin in 2015 for not reporting 2013 PQRS EHR systems mapped to PINNACLE Registry data elements for 2012 PQRS submission If you don t see your system here, don t despair! We map new systems constantly Participation in ACC data-driven Livelong Learning An Expanding and Equitable New ERA for Atrial Fibrillation 2.0 191 providers across 13 practices have used the data they already submit to PINNACLE Earn CME at each stage and MOC Part IV credits upon complete 4
Reduce your medical liability insurance premium Qualified ACC members covered by The Doctors Company receive: - 5% credit for actively participating in PINNACLE Registry -5% credit for maintaining board certification -5% program discount Reducing the burden on you and your staff The majority (64%) of practices spend less than 2 hours working on the PINNACLE Registry, a dramatic decrease in staff hours year over year. Less than 2 hours 64% 22% 2-4 Hours 22% 2% 5-9 Hours 11% 4% 10 Or More Hours 3% 15% 2012 Mean = 1.9 hours 2011 Mean = 6.8 hours Q: How many hours on average do you/your staff spend in a typical week working on the PINNACLE Registry? (n=36) 5
CARE Registry Carotid Artery Revascularization & Endarterectomy NCDR.13 Annual Conference Carotid Artery Revascularization & Endarterectomy Patient-centered care, quality improvement, innovative research Strong partnerships w ith stakeholders across the health care community 189 Facilities participating w ith continued grow th Total Records 30,066 CAS 17,895 CEA 12,170 CARE Participant Distribution 2011 1
Carotid Artery Revascularization & Endarterectomy Multidiscipline Best Practice Show case Supports MOC CMS - Coverage w ith Evidence Development Quality Improvement New age of Prove It Carotid Artery Revascularization & Endarterectomy Quarterly New sletters National quality seminars Quarterly/annual benchmark reports Clinical and technical staff call center support. Future For CARE 2
Peripheral Vascular Interventions Registry Q2 2014 We still CARE and w ill continue to: Provide excellent customer support Provide Web site education for new users Provide evidence based rationale that supports more informed treatment choices, better outcome and low er treatment costs NCDR PVI Registry Why include Peripheral Vascular Interventions in the NCDR Registries According to National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke approximately 8 million people in the US have PAD, including 12-20% of individuals older than age 60. General population awareness of PAD is estimated at 25%, based on prior studies. Increase in Peripheral Stent Procedures by Specialties Obtained form Medicare (CPT Code 37205) 120,000 Other 100,000 80,000 Interventional Radiology Vascular Surgery 60,000 Diag. Radiology 40,000 Internal Med Cardiology 20,000 Gen. Surgery - 1996 1998 2000 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 3
Peripheral Vascular Interventions Registry To enhance the quality of peripheral vascular patient care Increasing recognition of the importance of atherosclerotic lower extremity PAD: High prevalence undiagnosed PAD Poor quality of life The evidence base has become increasingly robust, so that a data-driven care guideline is now possible 4
IMPACT Registry Update Dr Joshua Kanter, MD FACC Presenter Disclosure Information Joshua Kanter, MD, FACC The following relationships exist related to this presentation: No Disclosures IMPACT Steering Committee Members Dr. Gerard Martin-Chair Dr. Robert Beekman III Dr. Lee Benson (international site) Dr. Lisa Bergersen Dr. Ralf Holzer Dr. Kathy Jenkins Dr. John Moore Dr. Richard Ringel Dr. Jonathan Rome Dr. Robert Vincent Dr. Douglas Weaver (ex officio) 1
IMPACT Registry Research & Publications Dr. John Moore- Chair Dr. Susan Foerster Dr. Andrew Glatz Dr. Ralf Holzer Dr. Joshua Kanter Dr. Joseph Kay Dr. Jacqueline Kreutzer Dr. Larry Latson IMPACT Registry Sites Cumulative IMPACT Sites Enrolled 2
Procedures Diagnostic Catheterizations Atrial Septal Defect Device Closure Patent Ductus Arteriosus Device Closure PS Valvuloplasty Procedures AS Valvuloplasty Procedures Coarctation of Aorta Interventions Pulmonary Artery Stenting Age Distribution on Admission 3
Next Steps Increase enrollment Modify data elements MOC Longitudinal Tracking, Risk Adjustment New Modules MAP-IT Multicenter Pediatric and Adult Congenital EP Quality Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve THANK YOU www.ncdr@acc.org 800 257-4737 4
STS/ACC TVT Registry Update Joan Michaels, RN Associate Director TVT Registry Patients Cardiologists Cardiac Surgeons Cumulative TVT Records Collected (May 2012-Feb 2013)
Cumulative TVT Sites Enrolled May 2011-Feb 2013 Current Status of TVT Registry Approved by CMS for Medicare National Coverage Determination registry requirements V1.2 launched Feb 28 th Edwards PAS II site recruitment began in July 191 sites enrolled Approved by FDA for AA IDE Next Steps Continue to recruit PAS II Sites Launch AA IDE