OVERVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS SYSTEM OF THAILAND

Similar documents
*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections

Skill Development Promotion Act, B.E (2002)

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Plan. Assembly Bill 109 and 117. FY Realignment Implementation

REPORT OF THE SEMINAR ON PROMOTING COMMUNITY-BASED TREATMENT IN THE ASEAN REGION

DOC & PRISONER REENTRY

Justice Reinvestment in Indiana Analyses & Policy Framework

Criminal Justice Division

Office of Criminal Justice Services

The Criminal Justice Information System at the Department of Public Safety and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. May 2016 Report No.

United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules)

STUDENT RISK ASSESSMENT (CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS) POLICY

STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES

Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT V. OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS

Deputy Probation Officer I/II

Felony Mental Health Court Success Through Addiction Recovery Drug Court Program Veterans Court

Follow-Up on VFM Section 3.01, 2014 Annual Report RECOMMENDATION STATUS OVERVIEW

Handout 8.4 The Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care, 1991

Chapter 5 COMMUNITY SUPERVISION. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear

Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109)

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2012 to FISCAL YEAR 2021

5/25/2010 REENTRY COURT PROGRAM

IC Chapter 2. State Grants to Counties for Community Corrections and Charges to Participating Counties for Confined Offenders

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SPOUSAL ABUSER PROSECUTION PROGRAM PROGRAM GUIDELINES

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 to FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015

THE PAROLE BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2016

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2013 to FISCAL YEAR 2022

September 2011 Report No

23 rd Council of Europe Conference of Directors of Prisons and Probation Services, Johvi, Estonia June 2018

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

2016 Community Court Grant Program

Overview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System

(2) Law on the Amendment of Law on the Management of Pharmaceuticals (2007)

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Act

Proposal for Prosecutor s Substance Abuse Diversion Program

JUVENILE JUSTICE REFORM ACT IMPLEMENTATION COMMISSION MEETING. February 21, 2011

PROPOSAL FAMILY VIOLENCE COURT

Agenda: Community Supervision Subgroup

WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS SMITH, MSSW TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

FY18 Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program

South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice Response to SCDJJ Broad River Campus: Final Report by Chinn Planning Inc.

TARRANT COUNTY DIVERSION INITIATIVES

DEPUTY PROBATION OFFICER I/II - INSTITUTIONS

FEDERAL LAW ON THE PROSECUTOR S OFFICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF 17 JANUARY 1992

DISABILITY-RELATED INQUIRIES CONCERNING INDIVIDUALS INCARCERATED IN PRISON. Prepared by the Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania

Leave for restricted patients the Ministry of Justice s approach

The Florida Legislature

COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT RESPONDS TO INCREASED GANG ACTIVITY

Criminal Justice Division

CALL FOR PRESENTERS TRAINING INSTITUTE THEME

REQUIRED DOCUMENT FROM HIRING UNIT

Testimony of Michael C. Potteiger, Chairman Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole House Appropriations Committee February 12, 2014

DISTRICT COURT. Judges (not County positions) Court Administration POS/FTE 3/3. Family Court POS/FTE 39/36.5 CASA POS/FTE 20/12.38

Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of U.S. Department of Justice Fact Sheet

BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER USFJ INSTRUCTION HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES FORCES, JAPAN 1 JUNE 2001 COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS 720 KENNON STREET SE RM 309 WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRAM (DVAP) 16-Week Program Guidelines Adopted February 16, 2016

Ministry of Children and Youth Services. Follow-up to VFM Section 3.13, 2012 Annual Report RECOMMENDATION STATUS OVERVIEW

Criminal Justice Review & Status Report

No February Criminal Justice Information Reporting

Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995

ALTERNATIVES FOR MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE PEACE OFFICERS STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION. LCB File No. R September 7, 2007

HUMAN SERVICES. What can I do with this major?

Qualification details

FY2017 Appropriations for the Department of Justice Grant Programs

Article 140a (New Provision) Case Management; Data Collection and Accessibility

COLORADO PROBLEM SOLVING COURTS BEST PRACTICES MANUAL

Cardiff & Vale UHB & South Wales Police Liaison & Diversion Scheme Protocol

Marin County STAR Program: Keeping Severely Mentally Ill Adults Out of Jail and in Treatment

Merced County. Public Safety Realignment & Post Release Community Supervision

REGISTERED OFFENDERS IN HEALTH CARE FACILITIES

New Directions --- A blueprint for reforming California s prison system to protect the public, reduce costs and rehabilitate inmates

Second Chance Act Grants: State, Local, and Tribal Reentry Courts

Montgomery County s Continuity of Care (COC) Court for Mentally Ill Probationers: Process Evaluation

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Voluntary Services as Alternative to Involuntary Detention under LPS Act

2 nd Circuit Court- District Division- Plymouth PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK 5/11/16

NO TALLAHASSEE, July 17, Mental Health/Substance Abuse

SUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Board of Pardons and Paroles Correctional Managed Health Care Committee

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PROGRAM MONTHLY STATUS REPORT

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

Eau Claire County Mental Health Court. Presentation December 15, 2011

Chapter 13: Agreements Overview

Greater Manchester Police and Crime Commissioner s Youth Aspiration Fund

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY REENTRY COURT PROGRAM (DISTRICT: ALL)

APPA 2019 WINTER TRAINING INSTITUTE CALL FOR PRESENTERS

CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS (COMAR)

COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS

Incarcerating nearly 60,000 inmates in state prison facilities

North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission

WINDSOR COUNTY, VERMONT DUI TREATMENT DOCKET (WCDTD) FOR REPEAT OFFENSE IMPAIRED DRIVING CASES

CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS (COMAR)

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

THE SOCIALLY DISPLACED PERSONS ACT, Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY

Prisoner Reentry and Adult Education. With our time together, we propose

Mental Health Casework Section Guidance - Section 17 leave

A Threat to Society? Arbitrary Detention of Women and Girls for Social Rehabilitation

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

Transcription:

OVERVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS SYSTEM OF THAILAND I. INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS IN THAILAND A. Historical Development of Community Corrections In Thailand, the probation service has its origin in 1952. It was unofficially started with juvenile supervision operating by juvenile detention centers. In 1956, the Penal Code was enacted and was also the first statutory foundation of the probation services in Thailand because the Section 56 58 of the Penal Code made it possible for judges to impose a suspended sentence with a probation condition. However, due to the lack of a responsible authority, during that initial period the courts hardly put this into practice. Not until 1979 the first probation office for adult offenders came into being, when the Probation Procedure Act 1979 was enacted. It was inaugurated on August 7 th, 1979, directly accountable to the Criminal Court, under the Office of Judicial Affairs. The office was responsible for the presentence investigation and supervision of adult offenders for the court in the Bangkok area. In 1983, it began to open regional probation offices to expand its work. In line with this expansion, a volunteer probation initiative was introduced. The first Volunteer Probation Officers (VPOs) was accordingly appointed in 1985. Undoubtedly, VPOs has since become our valuable local resource. On March 15 th, 1992 marked another remarkable reform in the Thai probation service when the Central Probation Office was officially supplanted by the new Department of Probation (DOP) under the responsibility of the Ministry of Justice. The DOP has continued to see many changes afterwards. One is that although for most of its history the probation service served simply adult probationers, it began to supervise other groups of clients within the community. The restructuring followed the recommendations of the cabinet resolution on July 10 th, 2001 that the DOP should be the main agency in dealing with community corrections. The role of probation officers has consequently shifted from providing a service to merely adult offenders to all types of probationers. That includes the pre-investigation of adult offenders; post-sentence investigation of parolees; the supervision of adult and juvenile probationers, and parolees; and the provision of after-care service for probationers, parolees, and ex-offenders. In 2002, Thailand witnessed further significant change as a result of the inception of the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act 2002. The Act has introduced the drug compulsory treatment programs with a new concept in solving drug problems. That is, drug addicts

should be considered as patients rather than criminals, according to government announcement In dealing with aggravating drug crisis, emphasis placed on the prevention, should not be less than the suppression. Drug addicts shall be treated, while drug producers or traffickers shall be harshly punished Therefore, the DOP has become the agency to enforce this act. In 2003, the Penal Code 1956 was amended and enabled judges to impose the Community Service Order in lieu of fine, supervised by probation officers. In 2005, the DOP became a key part of the historic forming of local Community Justice Networks nationwide under the Ministerial Strategy - Justice for All, All for Justice. Center to the initiative was to encourage the community to work in partnership with the DOP and other criminal justice agencies in preventing crime and protecting their own community. B. Legal Basis of Community Corrections 1. The Penal Code 1956, Section 56 58 2. The Probation Procedure Act 1979 3. The Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act 2002 C. Organization and Personnel The Department of Probation, Ministry of Justice is the main agency for administering probation during pre-trial and post-trial stages and is assigned to assess and rehabilitate drug addicts in accordance with the Drug Addict Rehabilitation Act 2002. In 2013, the DOP s vision is to be professional in protection of society by rehabilitating and reintegrating offenders to the community. According to the Ministerial Regulation on the Division of the Department of Probation 2008, the department has a duty to conduct social investigation, supervision, and rehabilitation; provide aftercare service for offenders and ex-offenders; provide drug rehabilitation for drug addicts in the compulsory treatment system in accordance with the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act; develop the system and program for the treatment of offenders; administer according to the Ministry policies and plan as well as monitor and evaluate the performance of the department s agencies; and coordinate the participation of the community in the treatment of offenders. In 2013, there are 108 probation offices countrywide and 4,250 officers consisting of 2,368 probation officers and 1,882 administrative officers.

Director-General Organization Structure Deputy Director- General Expert = Internal organization structure Inspector Central Administration Provincial Administration Office of the Secretary Administrative System Development Section Internal Audit Section Moral Standards and Ethical Conduct Section Probation Inspector Office Provincial Probation Office Branch Office Community Affairs and Community Service Division Planning and Information Division Research and Development Institute Human Resource Management Division Drug Addict Rehabilitation Center Probation Development Bureau Drug Addicts Rehabilitation Development Division Information Technology and Communication Center Bangkok Probation Office

D. Main Tasks 1. Pre-sentence and Post-sentence Investigation A key role of probation officers is to prepare the social investigation report for the court at the pre-sentence stage and the parole board at the post-sentence stage. The investigation process aims to collect and analyze material relating to the offender s background and case in order to make recommendations for appropriate punitive and rehabilitation measures. This will ultimately both protect society and reduce recidivism. 2. Supervision and Rehabilitation of Offenders Supervision of offenders consists of monitoring and assisting offenders to comply with their conditions. During the probation period, probation officers also help in rehabilitating offenders through various treatment programs, such as vocational training, moral education, counseling, group therapy and behavior modification. Community service can also be applied if an offender agrees with. 3. Welfare Service for Offenders and Ex-offenders Some offenders on probation are classified as socially disadvantaged and/or incapable of conforming to legal norms. Welfare services offered by the Department of Probation pay special attention to these and other released offenders, aiming for their successful rehabilitation and social reintegration. The offered services include meal and transportation allowances, educational or vocational training, employment opportunity, and housing services. 4. Drug Rehabilitation in the Compulsory Treatment System In accordance with the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act 2002, drug addicts who are arrested on charges of drug addiction, drug addiction and possession, drug addiction and possession for disposal, or drug addiction and disposal will be referred to the compulsory treatment system. E. Probationary and Parole Supervision 1. Pre-sentence and Post-sentence Investigation At present, criminal cases eligible for a pre-sentence investigation are those imposed a custodial sentence of not more than 3 year and the defendant pleads guilty. Probation officers have 15 days for the preparation after the court order which is extendable for another 30-day period if the court permits.

Cases referred to the post-sentence investigation are referred by the Department of Corrections. The aims of the investigation are to ensure that the offender will not reoffend and to protect the society from another crime. During the investigation process, a probation officer will gather information from the guarantor as well as the community and victims if necessary. The investigation process will take about 1 month but can be extended up to 2 months. Prisoners who are eligible for parole are those who serve one third of their sentence or 10 years in case of life imprisonment and have the remaining sentence at least one year. Additionally, prisoners are eligible for parole through sentence remission. If they serve their sentence for at least 6 months or 10 years in case of life imprisonment and their remaining sentence equals to the remission, they can be conditionally released on parole. 2. Supervision and Rehabilitation of Offenders The majority of offenders under the supervision of the department are adult offenders under the suspended sentence with the condition of probation. The court can order up to 5 years of suspension. However, the probation period is about 1 year. The condition of probation is also applied to juvenile offenders (10-18 yrs) by the Juvenile and Family court. According to Section 138 of the Juvenile and Family Court and Juvenile and Family Procedure Act 2010, the length of probation applied to juveniles shall not exceed 1 year. Prisoners who are released on parole or sentence remission shall also be supervised by probation officers. In conclusion, offenders under the supervision of the department consist of 3 groups. 1) Adult offenders aged 18 and above, who are on suspension of sentence or punishment 2) Prisoners who are released on parole or sentence remission 3) Juvenile offenders aged over 10 years but below 18 years who are: - Sentenced not-guilty but probation is deemed necessary - Sentenced guilty but given a suspended sentence with probation - Conditionally released from a training center - Discharged from a training center but probation is deemed necessary 3. Community Service The Department of Probation also offers the community service program for probationers. Community service can be used as a condition which the court orders for the probationers or the Sub-committee of Drug Addict Rehabilitation orders as a supplement to the drug treatment program. Additionally, the offenders who could not pay fine can conduct

community service in lieu of fine. However, community service must be conducted with the offenders consent and without remuneration. 4. Drug Rehabilitation in the Compulsory Treatment System If the offender is assessed as being addicted, the prosecutor will suspend the prosecution. The drug addict will then be treated according to the rehabilitation plan assigned by the Sub-committee of Drug Addict Rehabilitation. The treatment process is divided to 2 phases: 1) the drug treatment phase provided by drug rehabilitation centers taking about 4 months; 2) the social reintegration phase provided by probation offices taking about 2 months. The probation office acting as the secretary of the sub-committee will monitor the treatment process and report the rehabilitation results to the sub-committee. If the result is successful, the sub-committee will release the drug addict without prosecution and no criminal record. F. Residential Facilities within the Probation Services Drug Rehabilitation Center for Drug Addicts The Department of Probation has been responsible for the following drug rehabilitation centers. 1) Drug Addicts Rehabilitation Center: Ladlumkaew Home (Pathumthani Province) This center is for rehabilitation of Drug addicts in the intensive and custodial type, where a Therapeutic Community (TC) model is implemented. TC is a treatment program that engages the whole person in the rehabilitation process and challenges the individual to have a positive life. TC s primary goals are the cessation of drug abuse behavior and fostering personal growth. In the therapeutic community, everyone is equally treated and seen as a family member, while the rules and regulations are applied to everyone. Rewarding and punishment are used to shape the members behavior. Those who are wellperformed will be promoted to the next level and receive privileges. The concept underlying this model is that people can change and grow though a group process. 2) Drug Addicts Rehabilitation Center: Pattani Province This center is under construction and will be operated soon. G. Specific Measures and Programmes of Community Corrections

1. Offender Reintegration through the Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy The philosophy of the Sufficiency Economy was developed by His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej to show his people a balanced way of life. Sufficiency in this context means living in moderation and being self-reliant. This concept can be applied to all levels and sectors of the society and is not necessarily limited to the agricultural or rural area. Therefore, the Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy has also been adapted to offender rehabilitation and reintegration. As a part of the Inspire (Kamlangjai) project, in 2010 Her Royal Highness Princess Bajrakitiyabha introduced the Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy to the prisoners with the hope that they will be equipped with knowledge and understanding of sufficient economy and skills for sufficient living. Prisoners are expected to be capable of farming and selfsufficient living skills, such as bio-gas and bio-diesel production, herbal insecticide making, and brick house building; and to utilize those skills to earn a living that they choose to upon released. In order to facilitate a smooth transition from imprisonment to probation, the Department of Probation agrees to support the released prisoners in this project. In 2011, the pilot project was launched and 52 probation officers were trained to understand the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy so that they would be able to extend this knowledge in assisting the prisoners after release. The probation officers also made several visits to the probationers houses to see their living situation. By teaching the offenders how to live in moderation and to be self-reliant, the DOP hopes that this could help the offenders start their law-abiding life, which will prevent re-offending. 2. Family Support toward Drug free Life Due to excessively large caseloads, especially drug-related cases, and the limit number of the probation officers, the DOP needs to have a broader support from outside in monitoring the probationers to ensure their compliance with their probation conditions. Given that urgent need, in 2011 the DOP has started the pilot project named the Family Support toward Drug Free Life by inviting the families of drug-related offenders to take an active role in rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders. The family in this context includes (but not limit to) parents, spouse, family members, relatives, teachers, friends, and employers. The idea behind this project is that family is the closest group of people to the offenders and is the most valuable resource for encouraging and supporting them throughout their rehabilitation process. More importantly, the family also shares the same goal with the DOP which is to see success in the offenders rehabilitation. The DOP believes that the rehabilitation will be effective and sustainable only when each family actively engages and realizes that they are a crucial factor in helping their family members to overcome drug addiction. In July, 2012 the Ministry of Justice and the DOP held the opening of the Family

Support toward Drug Free Life with over 23,000 people participating in this event. Realizing that the families need basic information in order to supervising their children appropriately, therefore, from November to December, 2012 the DOP provided one-day training to the family members who live in Bangkok and Northeastern of Thailand. Having over 21,000 people attending the two-month training course has shown that the families are greatly concerned about their children s addiction and willing to support the work of the DOP. Given this success, in 2013 the DOP has planned to extend the training throughout the country. II. PARTICIPATION OF THE COMMUNITY A. Volunteer Probation Officers Volunteer Probation Officer Project (VPO) was established since 1985. Volunteer probation officers are community members who voluntarily work with the Department of Probation in providing probation services. After being trained on core knowledge in rehabilitating and supervising offenders, VPOs will assist probation officers in dealing with probationers in their local communities.

The following list comprises the basic qualification requirements for those interested in joining as a volunteer: - Be of at least 20 years of age - Live in a permanent residence - Be literate - Be a person of integrity and honesty - Have suitable income - Maintain law-abiding behavior - Have completed required training course - Have no criminal record except for petty offences or negligence Currently, there are 13,774 VPOs, working through 738 VPOs Coordinating Centers (as of August 2013). Those applying for a VPO are carefully screened, recruited, and specifically trained. Afterwards, they will be formally appointed and entitled according to the volunteer regulation. Their roles are mainly to assist probation officers with allocated casework, such as post-sentence investigation, supervision, rehabilitation, and monitoring probationers. Apart from this, they help local probation officers to educate people, sensitize the public, and get involved in other activities relating to probation and public protection. VPOs will not be paid but will get some benefits and honor, which are royal decorations, award for the distinguished performance, and exempt from health service fee. B. Community Justice Community justice underlines the community s involvement in the justice process. This concept views the community as the co-producer of justice and that the community should be empowered to work as a partner with other criminal justice agencies in maintaining public order and safety. Even though the community involvement in Thai criminal justice system has been recognized for more than two decades in various forms such as the Volunteer Probation Officer Scheme and the Volunteer in Right and Liberty Protection Scheme, the work is viewed as a top-down model or one way approach, where the criminal justice official assigned the volunteers to do the tasks. On the other hand, the concept of the community justice is to create partnership between the State and the general public. The Community Justice concept has been formally put into practice by the Ministry of Justice in 2005 under the Ministerial Strategy Justice for All, All for Justice. The main objective was to ask the community support in offender rehabilitation and reintegration to the society. In other words, it aims to empower the community to make itself strong through its own members. Under the initiative, many community justice centers are established within

the community, where the members are recruited from the general public as volunteers. They are then collaboratively involved in justice activities, such as crime prevention, offender rehabilitation, reconciliation of conflicts, and legal aid, etc. After nearly a decade since its inauguration, the community justice centers have proved to be an appropriate channel for the Thai criminal justice system in responding to the public needs and increase the public s confidence in the justice system. Each year, over 10,000 people have joined the community justice network and 100 centers have been set up. www.probation.go.th III. REFERENCE IV. STATISTICS Table 1: Investigation Cases by Gender (Newly admitted) Investigation 2010 2011 2012 2013 Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Pre-sentence Investigation 44,895 100% 43,320 100% 42,356 100% 45,873 100% Male 38,595 85.4% 37,086 85.6% 36,158 86.0% 38,960 84.9% Female 6,300 14.6% 6,234 14.4% 6,198 14.0% 6,913 15.1% Postsentence 36,163 100% 43,436 100% 41,927 100% 68,841 100% Investigation Male 31,025 85.8% 37,069 85.3% 34,764 82.9% 57,694 83.8% Female 5,138 14.2% 6,367 14.7% 7,163 17.1% 11,147 16.2% Table 2: Probation Population by Gender (Newly admitted) Types of Population Adult Probationer 2010 2011 2012 2013 Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage 125,949 100% 141,138 100% 148,703 100% 181,604 100% Male 113,325 90.0% 128,881 91.3% 137,487 92.5% 169,479 93.3% Female 12,624 10.0% 12,257 8.7% 11,216 7.5% 12,125 6.7% Parolee 22,721 100% 33,113 100% 25,469 100% 35,012 100% Male 19,498 85.8% 28,545 86.2% 21,215 83.3% 28,795 82.2% Female 3,223 14.2% 4,568 13.8% 4,254 16.7% 6,217 17.8% Juvenile Probationer 23,733 100% 23,548 100% 17,161 100% 20,436 100% Male 22,244 93.7% 19,357 82.2% 16,082 93.7% 19,229 94.0% Female 1,489 6.3% 4,191 17.8% 1,079 6.3% 1,207 6.0%

Table 3: Probation Population by Selected Types of Offence (Newly admitted) Year Drug related Traffic related Property offence Against life Sexual offence offence offence offence 2010 43,672 62,566 14,535 10,966 3,616 2011 74,498 65,813 15,983 11,575 3,760 2012 78,211 66,835 12,272 9,838 3,116 2013 119,386 66,821 13,283 10,847 3,285 Figure 1: Recidivism Rate (Reoffending within 3 years after Termination) 30 25 26.01 Percentage 20 15 10 10.73 14.2 14.91 17.83 20.86 5 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Table 4: Drug Rehabilitation Cases in the Compulsory System (Newly admitted) Year Male Female Total 2010 109,079 10,441 119,520 2011 161,204 16,378 177,582 2012 159,475 16,591 176,066 2013 186,501 17,460 203,961 Table 5: Community Service Cases Year Court Order Fine Substitution Total 2011 205,480 471 205,951 2012 221,394 243 221,637 2013 265,011 307 265,318

Table 6: Volunteer Probation Officers and Community Justice Member (as of August 2013) Types Number Volunteer Probation Officers 13,774 Community Justice Member 80,998 Figure 2: Number of Staff (Fiscal Year 2012) Number 1,964 Probation Officers Administrative Officers 2,466 Table 7: Monthly Caseload (Fiscal Year 2013) Standard Monthly Caseload per Staff Investigation Case Supervision Case Actual Monthly Caseload per Staff 8.56 cases 15.54 cases 26 cases Note : -Fiscal year in Thailand is from October 1 st - September 30 th -Sources: Division of Planning and Information, Department of Probation, Ministry of Justice, Thailand