THE NATIONAL DECLASSIFICATION. Releasing What We Can, Protecting What We Must

Similar documents
Improving the Intelligence Community s Declassification Process and the Community s Support to the National Declassification Center.

2005 REPORT to THE PRESIDENT INFORMATION SECURITY OVERSIGHT OFFICE

REPORT ON COST ESTIMATES FOR SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ACTIVITIES FOR 2005

REPORT to the PRESIDENT. NATIONAL ARCHIVES and RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is revising its procedures

Information Security Oversight Office

NATO UNCLASSIFIED ARCHIVES COMMITTEE. Directive on the Public Disclosure of NATO Information

Declassification Options and Requirements

This page left blank.

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

For Immediate Release October 7, 2011 EXECUTIVE ORDER

9/2/2015. The National Security Exemption. Exemption 1. Exemption 1

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATION At INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, DC 20511

Student Guide Course: Original Classification

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

EXECUTIVE ORDER

Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudications Facility

Office of Inspector General

Re: Freedom of Information Act Request NGC

Delayed Federal Grant Closeout: Issues and Impact

VERIFICATION FOR IMPLEMENTING GRS 6.1: MANAGED UNDER A CAPSTONE APPROACH

Directive on United States Nationals Taken Hostage Abroad and Personnel Recovery Efforts June 24, 2015

GAO. Testimony Before the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives

Security Asset Protection Professional Certification (SAPPC) Competency Preparatory Tools (CPT)

Security Classification Guidance v3

OVERVIEW OF THE OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL (NDIA)

Historical Imagery Digitization Data Project

The 911 Implementation Act runs 280 pages over nine titles. Following is an outline that explains the most important provisions of each title.

SECURITY EXECUTIVE AGENT DIRECTIVE 1

Open FAR Cases as of 2/9/ :56:25AM

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

A. AUTHORITY: The National Security Act of 1947, as amended; Executive Order (EO) 12333, as amended; and other applicable provisions of law.

DOE B, SAFEGUARDS AGREEMENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC SYMBOL, AND OTHER CHANGES HAVE BEEN BY THE REVISIONS,

SUITABILITY AND SECURITY PROCESSES REVIEW REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT FEBRUARY 2014

Creating an Insider Threat Program. NCMS June 2015

SERIES 1100 UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR INTELLIGENCE (USD(I)) ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION (ASD(NII))

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

National Incident Management System (NIMS) & the Incident Command System (ICS)

DOD DIRECTIVE DOD POLICY AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATING TO SECURITY COOPERATION

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER 501

Declaration of Conformance with Executive Order Challenges for Department of the Army Installations

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. DoD Executive Agent (EA) for the DoD Cyber Crime Center (DC3)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Information Security Program and Protection of Sensitive Compartmented Information

Department of Defense

PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCES

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, G ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

reducing over-classification required in Section 6 of the Reducing Over-Classification Act (H.R. 553). 2013

Radiological Nuclear Detection Task Force: A Real World Solution for a Real World Problem

Advancing Accountability for Improving HCAHPS at Ingalls

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

ArPath: Advancing Electronic LTSS Systems in Arkansas

January 3, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

DOD INSTRUCTION DOD ISSUANCES PROGRAM

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario

NPRC Records A Presentation for: Josh Crisp. Dan Hunter Adminiistrative Officer/Mgmt Analyst National Personnel Records Center.

FACT SHEET NATIONAL OPERATIONS SECURITY PROGRAM

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 IT President's Budget Request Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office

RECORDS MANAGEMENT TRAINING

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) National Security Information Manual, February 1, 2005

Donald Mancuso Deputy Inspector General Department of Defense

Referral Laboratories

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

DOD DIRECTIVE INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT

REPORT 2015/189 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

DODEA ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION , VOLUME 1 DODEA PERSONNEL SECURITY AND SUITABILITY PROGRAM

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Third Report on Inadvertent Releases of Restricted Data and Formerly Restricted Data under Executive Order (Deleted Version) (U) Report to:

Report of the Information & Privacy Commissioner/Ontario. Review of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario (CCN):

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Confinement of Military Prisoners and Administration of Military Correctional Programs and Facilities

DOD INSTRUCTION FORCE HEALTH PROTECTION QUALITY ASSURANCE (FHPQA) PROGRAM

Army Regulation Security. Department of the Army. Information Security Program. Headquarters. Washington, DC 29 September 2000 UNCLASSIFIED

Reduced by Changing.

I 11'II~ II. TI C Department of Defense. O j. LECTEDJRFTIVEJuly 19, ~V I "" AD-A NUME

Protection of Classified National Intelligence, Including Sensitive Compartmented Information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY INSIDER THREAT PROGRAM. (1) References (2) DON Insider Threat Program Senior Executive Board (DON ITP SEB) (3) Responsibilities

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

City Secretary Technology Plan. City Council Briefing April 15, 2009

July 30, SIGAR Audit-09-3 Management Information Systems

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

GAO INDUSTRIAL SECURITY. DOD Cannot Provide Adequate Assurances That Its Oversight Ensures the Protection of Classified Information

SUMMARY FOR CONFORMING CHANGE #1 TO DoDM , National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM)

Department of Defense MANUAL. DoD Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Program

SERIES 700 ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (PUBLIC AFFAIRS) (ASD (PA))

Derivative Classification Requirements

Defense Security Service Academy OCA Desk Reference Guide

DOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES. Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

INSIDER THREATS. DOD Should Strengthen Management and Guidance to Protect Classified Information and Systems

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Speaker Bios (as of July 13, 2012)

Derivative Classifier Training

Draft resolution IV Strengthening the capacity of the United Nations to manage and sustain peacekeeping operations

B July 19, The Honorable Benjamin A. Gilman Chairman, Committee on International Relations House of Representatives

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Transcription:

THE NATIONAL DECLASSIFICATION CENTER Releasing What We Can, Protecting What We Must Michael J. Kurtz, Assistant Archivist for Records Services National Archives and Records Administration National Declassification Center 1 Problems in Implementation Execution of the EO 12958, as amended, has been hampered because of a lack of coordination among agencies on review, referral, and declassification policies and processes. The results of the agency-centric centric approach are: Between 1997 and 2007 the Federal Government acknowledges spending $1.343 billion on declassification. This does NOT include the monies spent by the Intelligence Community on declassification. Without reform in policy and process, billions of dollars will be spent perpetuating a declassification system that t does not work, while the backlog of records awaiting processing for the open shelves will continue to grow. The declassification problem grows worse as the volume and complexity of records increases, and the current (textual) and future (electronic and special media) problems are not resolved. National Declassification Center 2 1

Problems in Implementation The Federal government has 408 million pages of historical records that are 25 years and older at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) that are still classified and an estimated 1.24 billion pages of historical records in agency custody which need to be reviewed and declassified over the next 25 years. The public expects access to the 408 million pages at NARA, but they cannot be moved to the open shelves because: Agencies need to review their equity in the records of other agencies (referrals). Systemic quality issues have been identified, including missed sensitive information and referred non-sensitive information. National Declassification Center 3 THE DECLASSIFICATION PROBLEM: NARA s Actions Recognizing g these problems, NARA took several actions which together are called the National Declassification Initiative (NDI): Established an Interagency Referral Center (IRC) Established a Quality Assurance (QA) review process Developed annual work plans to prioritize records processing and declassification These actions cut into the cycle of re-review review by: Establishing some interagency collaboration on a voluntary basis Making declassification decisions, as opposed to making more uninformed referrals National Declassification Center 4 2

THE DECLASSIFICATION PROBLEM: NARA s Lessons Learned While some process improvements were made, and some success realized, problems remained: 1) Lack of standardized declassification guidance Agencies that generate the same types of information are not always protecting it in the same way, or for the same length of time. 2) Lack of coordinated equity recognition training among agencies Agency reviewers do not have ready access to guides of potential equity holding agencies and have received little or no equity recognition training from those agencies. As a result they are not always aware of other agency equities when reviewing their own records. This leads to missed equities and improper referrals. National Declassification Center 5 THE DECLASSIFICATION PROBLEM: NARA s Lessons Learned 3) Ad hoc decision making leads to inconsistent declassification decisions During an ISOO audit of agency review procedures at Archives II, it was found that many reviewers did not have access to or were not using their agency s current declassification guides. In the absence of these guides, reviewers were relying on their gut, verbal guidance or prior knowledge to make declassification decisions. 4) Agency s commitment to ongoing declassification activity under the EO has waned Agencies committed resources to meeting the Dec. 2006 review deadline, but have since refocused their declassification efforts. This leaves the challenges of referrals, and review of special media or electronic records under resourced. Declining voluntary participation has also led to growing backlogs in the QA and referral processes in the NDI. National Declassification Center 6 3

HOW TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM? Establish a National Declassification Center (NDC) to: Translate policy decisions into effective, transparent, standard work processes that protect national security information and ensure public access to historically valuable records. Develop solutions to emerging technological challenges found in electronic and special media records containing historically valuable national security information. Enable efficient and effective agency review and resolution of equities in both Federal and Presidential records. National Declassification Center 7 WHAT WILL THE NDC DO? 1. Integrate and Coordinate Declassification Review Work with agencies to develop a more integrated declassification process. Work with agencies to ensure permanent records are reviewed by established deadlines, and all pertinent information is tracked until the document is released to the public. Develop an integrated IT system to support the needs of an integrated declassification process. National Declassification Center 8 4

WHAT WILL THE NDC DO? 2. Support Declassification Review Manage an Interagency Referral Process to adjudicate referrals. Provide space and support for agencies to review their equities referred by other agencies. Establish a Quality Assurance process to mitigate the risk inadvertent releases. Develop prioritization and work plans to focus declassification efforts on records of high public interest. National Declassification Center 9 WHAT WILL THE NDC DO? 3. Consolidate Declassification Guidelines Establish a library of approved declassification guides to ensure reviewers have access to all information necessary to accurately complete review of their agency s records. Develop standard guides to ensure classified information common to multiple agencies is protected the same way by everyone. National Declassification Center 10 5

WHAT WILL THE NDC DO? 4. Develop instructional and automated training programs. To ensure reviewers at the NDC have thorough and up to date knowledge of policies and practices. To provide equity recognition training to all reviewers. To establish certification courses available to all government declassification reviewers. National Declassification Center 11 WHAT WILL THE NDC DO? 5. Process and Review Special Media Records Establish a system to preserve, reformat and review Classified Special Media (CSM). Support redaction of CSM records requested under FOIA/MDR. Advise agencies on issues related to at risk or obsolete record formats. National Declassification Center 12 6

WHAT WILL THE NDC DO? 6. Process and Review Electronic Records Develop a system to store and retrieve classified electronic records. Establish procedures to support review and referral of classified electronic records by agency reviewers. National Declassification Center 13 WHAT WILL THE NDC DO? 7. Process Special Access Requests Develop an IT system to support review and processing of FOIA and MDR requests for accessioned records. Support review of Presidential Records through the Remote Archives Capture program. Support review of Legislative records in response to Congressional mandates. National Declassification Center 14 7

WHAT WILL THE NDC DO? 8. Perform Archival Processing Accession classified records into archival storage. Process reviewed records to segregate classified from unclassified records. Perform archival a processing of declassified records. Transfer declassified records to the open shelves for public access. National Declassification Center 15 WHAT IS NARA PREPARED TO DO? Phase I Work with the agencies to complete a Business Process Re- Engineering of NDC processes. This process will: Detail current declassification processes. Design and implement improved declassification processes in the NDC. National Declassification Center 16 8

WHAT IS NARA PREPARED TO DO? Phase II Develop a Concept of Operation for the NDC, and convert the NDI into the NDC at Archives II. NARA will begin the process of making changes to the NDI to establish basic NDC functionality in College Park. NARA will develop a Concept of Operations that details NDC functions and requirements. National Declassification Center 17 WHAT IS NARA PREPARED TO DO? Phase III Design and build an electronic system to support improved declassification processes as detailed in the BPR. The system will: Track all agency referrals in classified permanent records. od Track declassification and referral review decisions. Have automated redaction capability. National Declassification Center 18 9

WHAT IS NARA PREPARED TO DO? Phase IV Conduct a Cost Benefit analysis to determine if it is in the best interest of the Government to build a separate, secure NDC facility. A Secure Facility would need to: Be TS/SCI Certified with partitioned storage. Meet archival standards for storage of permanent records. Provide storage for 1.2 million cubic feet of records 250,000 square feet for records storage Have review/processing space to accommodate 270 NARA and Agency staff (with parking) National Declassification Center 19 NDC Summary - Benefits Provides opportunities for collaboration and better understanding of equities among agencies. The inter- agency quality assurance teams operate more effectively in this work environment. Provides a structure for developing better and more uniform guidance, training, and information systems to document declassification decisions. Lays organizational groundwork to address the emerging challenge of electronic and special media records. Improves the oversight of interagency declassification activities and decisions. Ensures that still sensitive material remains protected, while opening more information to the American people. National Declassification Center 20 10

Questions Michael J. Kurtz Assistant Archivist for Records Services National Archives and Records Administration 301-837-3110 michael.kurtz@nara.gov National Declassification Center 21 11