General Procedure - Institutional Review Board

Similar documents
Institutional Review Board (previously referred to as Human Participants Research Board) Updated January 2004

(Type inside gray boxes, cells will expand) A. EIGHT POINT CRITERIA for IRB Review

Guidelines for Review of Research Involving Human Subjects

INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

Title: Investigator Responsibilities. SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017

SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board

Institutional Review Board Manual. University of the Incarnate Word

Grambling State University Application for Human Subjects Review IRB Protocol. 1. Principal Investigator [Last Name, First Name, Middle Initial]

NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board

ETHICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS

Standard Operating Procedure IRB Review of Research Subject to the Revised Common Rule

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD For Human Subjects Research POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR INVESTIGATORS

Legally Authorized Representatives in Clinical Trials

IRB 101. Rachel Langhofer Joan Rankin Shapiro Research Administration UA College of Medicine - Phoenix

The SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.

WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE. Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Guidelines

IRB Federal Regulations Comparison Table 4/24/01 as updated through 10/31/01

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Operational Manual

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

IRB Process for SURF April 21, 2015

PART 512 RESEARCH. Subpart B Research. 28 CFR Ch. V ( Edition)

HUMAN SUBJECTS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES

WELCOME. Payment will be expected at the time of service. Please remember our 24 hour cancellation notice.

ETHICS COMMITTEE: ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS K.R.CHANDRAMOHANAN NAIR DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Genesis Health System. Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures

Institutional Review Board Student (Other Investigator) Instructions & Information. Do not begin work until written IRB approval is issued!

Washington University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures. April 20, 2015

Are you participating in any other research studies? Yes No

New York Notice Form Notice of Psychologists Policies and Practices to Protect the Privacy of Your Health Information

NEW JERSEY CITY UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

HUMAN SUBJECTS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES

Utilizing the NCI CIRB

Implementing the Revised Common Rule Exemptions with Limited IRB Review

Aberdeen School District No North G St. Aberdeen, WA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 21 ST CENTURY GRANT PROGRAM EVALUATOR

EXEMPT RESEARCH. 1. Overview

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB DATA SHARING INDEPENDENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (IRC) CHARTER

Study Responsibilities. Choose all that apply. f. Draw/collect laboratory specimens

GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING A VOLUNTARY STUDENT FEE PLEDGE SYSTEM

Evaluation ethics Evaluation resources from Wilder Research

Section 11. Recruitment of Study Subjects (Revised 7/1/10)

Summary of the Common Rule Changes

Adherence to the steps outlined below will expedite the processing of your request:

The University of Southern Maine Policies, Procedures and Guidance For Human Subjects Research

Drugs and Cosmetics rules, 2013 India

Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

Working with Other Agencies

G U I D E L I N E S. for the. FGCU Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Institutional Review Board for Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Manual for Faculty, Staff, and Student Researchers

Privacy Board Standard Operating Procedures

AAHRPP Accreditation Procedures Approved April 22, Copyright AAHRPP. All rights reserved.

REGULATORY AND FUNDING CHANGES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

1.2.1 It is the policy of the University of Alabama that qualifying research may be reviewed using an expedited procedure.

Introduction...2. Purpose...2. Development of the Code of Ethics...2. Core Values...2. Professional Conduct and the Code of Ethics...

Institutional Review Board Application for Exempt Status Determination

Walsh University IRB Policy and Procedure Manual Part I

"Getting Your Protocol Through the IRB"

University of Colorado Denver Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) Policies and Procedures for the Protection of Human Subjects

Checklist for Adult Sponsor (1)

LifeBridge Health HIPAA Policy 4. Uses of Protected Health Information for Research

Client Information Form

Purpose: To provide policy and guidelines and helpful information for conducting research at Brooks

Arizona Department of Education

University of California, San Diego Human Research Protections Program Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Policies and Procedures

Associates in ear, nose, throat/ Head & Neck surgery, pllc

HIPAA PRIVACY RULE: ACCESS TO PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION. A. General Right to Access Protected Health Information 1

Ch. 103 GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT 28 CHAPTER 103. GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT A. GOVERNING PROCESS

San Francisco Department of Public Health Policy Title: HIPAA Compliance Privacy and the Conduct of Research Page 1 of 10

Accreditation Commission Policy and Procedure Manual

CPD Research and Development Grant Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto

Adherence to the steps outlined below will expedite the processing of your request:

Printed from the Texas Medical Association Web site.

External Research Application Resource Guide

Institutional Review Board - Human Subjects. Regulations and Procedures 1. March California State University, Los Angeles

IRB review of international research. Pre-conference P1 FCPA 3 rd Party Due Diligence for Health Entities. Today

PATIENT BILL OF RIGHTS & NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES

GUIDELINES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AND CONDUCT OF THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

PROCEDURES GOVERNING HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

The Queen s Medical Center HIPAA Training Packet for Researchers

SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY ONE WASHINGTON SQUARE SAN JOSÉ, CA 95192

RESIDENT PHYSICIAN AGREEMENT THIS RESIDENT PHYSICIAN AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made by and between Wheaton Franciscan Inc., a Wisconsin nonprofit

Pennsylvania Office of Developmental Programs (ODP) Independent Monitoring for Quality (IM4Q) Manual. January 2016

Signature (Patient or Legal Guardian): Date:

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES WARNING LETTER. (b) (4) clinical investigation (Protocol entitled A Phase II, Multicenter,

Code of Ethics. March College of Registered Psychiatric Nurses of B.C. Suite St. Johns Street Port Moody, British Columbia V3H 2B4

Demystifying the IRB

RESEARCH APPLICATION RESOURCE GUIDE

(PLEASE PRINT) Sex M F Age Birthdate Single Married Widowed Separated Divorced. Business Address Business Phone Cell Phone

always legally required to follow the privacy practices described in this Notice.

Chapter 2: Guiding Principles Chapter 3: Authority and Delegation

New Brunswick Association of Occupational Therapists. Purpose of the Code of Ethics. Page 1 of 6 CODE OF ETHICS

GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

Form B - For those enrolled in other insurance

NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES

Mercer Science and Engineering Fair Junior & Senior Division Instructions All fair dates can be found on the MSEF website

For questions, concerns, to provide input, or request a consultation, call HRPP staff at

The Act of 2 July 1999 No. 63 relating to Patients Rights (the Patients Rights Act)

APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH REQUESTING AN IRB WAIVER OF CONSENT AND HIPAA AUTHORIZATION

Transcription:

General Procedure - Institutional Review Board Purpose: The primary purpose of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to protect the welfare of human subjects used in research. All research requests meeting the following conditions must be reviewed by the IRB. This procedure is intended to assure college staff and students who may be affected by the research that the research is sound and does not violate board policy, college operating procedures, or federal regulations concerning protection of human participants. Composition: The Institutional Review Board is chaired by the Chief Institutional Effectiveness and Strategic Planning Officer, who shall annually appoint five voting members to serve, including the Dean of Academic Affairs, the Institutional Research Analyst, one faculty member from the liberal arts and science, one faculty member from a career and technical education program, and one individual external to the college. Additional faculty or staff members may serve in an advisory capacity where appropriate. Approval Procedure: The following persons or groups of persons must comply with the Bismarck State College (BSC) approval to conduct research procedures: 1. Any person or group of persons who is neither employed by nor a student of BSC and who wishes to use BSC employees, students, records, or facilities as part of a research project or study. 2. Any BSC student or employee proposing to conduct a study that a. Involves activities outside their regular assigned duties and involves human subjects; b. Involves a grant application requiring IRB review. After receiving the completed request from the researcher, the Institutional Review Board will verify the following items:

1. The Research Proposal Form has been completed. 2. The appropriate signatures have been obtained. 3. The proposed research is compatible with BSC's mission and purpose and is educationrelated. The research should deal with the teaching/learning environment or with the college's policies, procedures or operations. 4. The proposal meets the requirements of Protection of Human Subjects (45CFR46). 5. The results will be disseminated in a fashion which would protect the identity of the participants and, if appropriate, the college. It must be understood that names of individuals will not be used in the study unless the individuals grant permission in writing. The name of Bismarck State College will be used only if the Institutional Review Board grants permission. Criteria for Approval: Individuals requesting authorization to conduct research must complete a Bismarck State College Research Proposal form (see attachment). The IRB chairperson, or designee, will conduct an initial review. Approval of the proposal will be based on the following criteria: 1. Compatibility with the college's mission and purpose. 2. Acceptability of the potential effects the collection of data and the dissemination and use of results may have on BSC students, personnel, operations, and the community. Timeline and Notification of Approval or Disapproval: Ordinarily the requestor will be contacted concerning the status of the request within ten working days of receipt of the proposal. If possible, approval or denial of the request will be made at that time. If a delay is necessary, an appropriate timeline will be negotiated with the requestor. If a research request is denied, the notification will include the reason(s) for the denial. A revised proposal, or sections thereof, may be submitted for reconsideration. Page 2

Research Proposal Form Note: Please complete this form and attach brief responses to the issues raised, keeping in mind that the primary concern is the potential risk physical, emotional, or other to the participants, as well as the protection of their rights. Submit the proposal and supporting documents to the Institutional Review Board, c/o Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Strategic Planning, Bismarck State College. Principal investigator: Title: Institution: Address: Phone: Fax: Email: Research/Project Title: Data Collection/Project Start Date: Research/Project Description: Using the guidelines on the next pages, address the following in a narrative. Briefly describe the purpose of your study and what will the participants be asked to do, what are the processes and procedures for data collection. Append relevant instruments (protocols, questionnaires, surveys, etc.). Describe any potential risks or benefits (emotional, physical, social, or political) to your participants. Give the anticipated ages, sex, and number of participants, and explain how, when, and where they will be recruited. Describe the procedures for obtaining informed consent as provided for the Code of Federal Regulations, section 46.116. Append any forms used. For Non-Exempt Projects Only: If minors are involved, describe the procedures for obtaining consent to participate from the minors capable of giving consent, as well as the procedures to obtain parental or guardian consent. If risk is involved, explain how the knowledge to be gained and/or the benefits to the research participants from the proposed research justify any risks the participants might incur. Explain what, if any, support services will be provided in the event of harm to a participant. Page 3

Signatures Certification I certify that I have read and understand the policies and procedures for research projects that involve human participants and that I intend to comply with the Bismarck State College procedures for research involving human participants. Significant changes in the research protocol for an approved study must be submitted to the IRB and approved prior to those changes being put into practice. Researcher/Project Director Signature: Date Department Chair/Program Director Signature: Date Check one of the following, indicating the category into which this research falls according to Title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46: Project is exempt. Cite exempt category (see Guidelines): Project is referred to Institutional Review Board for review. IRB Chairperson Signature: Date Page 4

Bismarck State College Research Project Guidelines Institutional Review Board Criteria for Ethical Research The following requirements for the approval of research is based upon the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Public Welfare, Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects, (revised June 23, 2005). The scope and interpretation of this checklist are determined by reference to that original document. Requirements of All Research: Risks to participants, where they exist, will be minimized and are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits. (46.111a 1-2) Participants will be equitably chosen, especially in the case of vulnerable populations children, prisoners, pregnant women, mentally disabled persons, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons. (46.111a 3) Documentation of informed consent will be obtained from each participant or participant s legal representative. (46.111a 4-5; see Required Elements for Informed Consent below) Measures will be taken to monitor data collected to insure the safety and privacy of the participants. (46.111a 6-7) In the case of vulnerable populations, additional safeguards will be included to prevent coercion or undue influence by the researcher. (46.111b) Required Elements for Informed Consent: The consent form provides a clear and non-technical explanation of the research project sufficient to inform a participant s decision to participate or not. (46.116a 1) The consent form describes any foreseeable risks or discomforts, as well as possible benefits to the participant. (46.116a 2-3) The consent form informs the participant of the extent to which confidentiality will be maintained. (46.116a 5) The consent form identifies a person to contact should questions regarding the research or the participant's rights arise. (46.116a 7) The consent form provides a statement that participation is voluntary and that refusal to participate or termination of participation will result in no harm to the participant. (46.116a 8) When appropriate the following should also be included: If relevant, the consent form describes any alternative treatments being withheld by the researcher that might be advantageous to the participant. (46.116a 4) The consent form explains any compensation to be provided should harm to the participant occur. (46.116a 6) Page 5

Criteria for a Project to be Exempt from Review To be exempt from review, a project must be in one of these categories: Categories (one of the following): Research in common educational settings, involving normal or special educational practices. (46.101b 1) Research involving educational tests, surveys, interviews, or observation unless confidentiality cannot be maintained or disclosure places the participants at risk. (46.101b 2) Research involving elected or appointed public officials or candidates for office, even when confidentiality cannot be maintained or disclosure places the participants at risk. (46.101b 3) Research involving the study of existing data either publicly available or recorded by the researcher(s) in a manner that maintains confidentiality. (46.101b 4) Institutional or organizational research designed to improve service or benefits when approved by the agency's head. (46.101b 5) References: Adapted from: 1. Oakton Community College, http://www.oakton.edu/resource/oir/institutionalreviewboard.pdf, January 2004 2. 45 CFR Part 46, June 23, 2005 3. Sinclair Community College, www.sinclair.edu/departments/grants, November 2006 History of This Procedure: First procedure draft December 8, 2006. Revisions August 2, 2013. Page 6