Assuring Quality in Assisted Living: Guidelines for Federal and State Policy, State Regulations, and Operations

Similar documents
Topic Group Recommendations Adopted by Two-Thirds Majority of the ALW Affordability

National Coalition on Care Coordination (N3C)

The Olmstead Decision: Consumer Rights to and Opportunities for Nursing Home Alternatives. Prepared by Hollis Turnham, Esquire Center Consultant

Health & Financial Decisions

Position Description. Long-Term Care Ombudsman Representatives Program Coordinator

The Health Care Law: Good News for Caregivers

An Ombudsman s Guide to the Nursing Home Reform Law

December 22, Submitted via

State Survey Agencies Promoting Culture Change in Long-term Care

National Senior Citizens Law Center 1330 Broadway, Suite 525, Oakland, CA 94612! (510) ! Fax (510)

NORS Part IV, Quiz with Answers. Introduction

Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Training Standards Report of Workgroup Meetings and Proposals for Standards. March 2017.

Involuntary Transfer/Discharge: A Growing Problem We Can Do Something About!

This Years Theme is: Better Staffing the Key to Better Care

Older Adult Services. Submitted as: Illinois Public Act Status: Enacted into law in Suggested State Legislation

September 22, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

NCCNHR. How to Participate in the Care of Your Loved One During A Nursing Home Stay. Practical Tips For Ongoing Family Involvement.

Integrated Licensure Background and Recommendations

CRS , the program was given a separate authorization of appropriations (P.L ) and, in 1992, the program was incorporated into a new Titl

2016 Activities and Accomplishments

Overview of New Federal Nursing Facility Regulations * What s happened? When are the new regs effective?

National Coalition on Care Coordination (N3C) Care Coordination and the Role of the Aging Network. Monday, September 12, 2011

Ombudsman Programs: Advocacy in Board & Care Present. Louise Ryan, MPA Ombudsman Program Specialist, ACL/AoA October 26, 2013

HOUSE AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 255

Caregiving 101 Checklist

Health Care Reform Provisions Affecting Older Adults and Persons with Special Needs 3/30/10

Home Care Ombudsman Programs Status Report: 2007

Collaborations between Long-Term Care Ombudsmen and Protection & Advocacy Agencies A Report written by

HOSPICE CONTRACTING CHECKLIST FOR INPATIENT SERVICES, RESPITE CARE AND VENDOR AGREEMENTS

Council on Linkages Between Academia and Public Health Practice Meeting. July 16, 2018

Federal Requirements of Participation for Nursing Homes Summary of Key Changes in the Final Rule Issued September 2016 Phase 2

Connecticut Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program 2015 Annual Report

Advocating for the Unbefriended Elderly

Long-Term Care Improvements under the Affordable Care Act (ACA)

Summary Quality of care in long-term care settings has been, and continues to be, a concern for federal policymakers. The Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsm

Advance Directive for Mental Health Care

Washington, DC Washington, DC Washington, DC Washington, DC 20515

Caring for Your Aging Parents

Forward-thinking healthcare solutions It s what we do. Healthcare Law

Creating Home Through Choice and Purpose

Friday Morning Collaborative Webinar

Volunteer Consultants: Extending the Reach of Ombudsman Programs

8/27/2015. Background Overview Overarching Themes & Highlights of the Proposed Rule Areas of Concern Submitting Comments Resources Questions

GERIATRIC SERVICES CAPACITY ASSESSMENT DOMAIN 4 ALTERNATE LIVING ARRANGEMENTS

Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Summary and Recommendations

Operations/ Quality Improvement Track

Model Core Program Paper: Healthy Community Care Facilities and Assisted Living Residences

ELDER MEDICAL CARE. Elder Medical. Counseling & Support. Hospice. Care. Care

ADULT LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES

In Solidarity, Paul Pecorale Second Vice President

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law )

Alaska s Behavioral Health Workforce: Identifying occupations that are hardest for employers to fill and assessing what can be done to help

U.S. Chamber of Commerce 1615 H Street NW Washington, DC INTERNSHIP PROGAM

MEDIMASTER GUIDE. MediMaster Guide. Positively Aging /M.O.R.E The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Sec. 22. [144A.4796] HOME CARE PROVIDER RESPONSIBILITIES; STAFF

Clinical/Care Practices Track

LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF AGING (LADOA) OFFICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE SCHEDULE "A" - DESIGNATED POSITIONS

March 5, March 6, 2014

CDCAN REPORT (MAY ): Dept of Developmental Services Selects Phoenix AZ Firm To

Technical Revisions to Update Reference to the Required Assessment Tool for. State Nursing Homes Receiving Per Diem Payments From VA

Home Care Packages Programme Guidelines

Expansion of Respite Care Through the Faith Community

Legal Rights and Decision-Making

Subtitle E New Options for States to Provide Long-Term Services and Supports

October 8, The Honorable Jerry Moran U.S. Senate 361A Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC Dear Senator Moran:

Addressing Elder Abuse in Minnesota Long-Term Care Settings

A Care Plan Guide. (Simple Steps To Caring For Your Loved Ones)

Housing with Services

STATE OF NEVADA LONG TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM. Aging and Disability Services Division

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group

MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS AUTHORIZATIONS OR MANDATES: PROVISIONS AND CITATIONS IN ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES LAWS, BY STATE

ADVANCED DIRECT CARE WORKER

7/21/2016. Agenda. Chicago Network s Top 10 Recommendations. House Call Program Development. Chicago Home Centered Care Network

Going The Distance To Improve The Care Span: The Duel Over The Dual Eligibles And The Implications For Health Reform

2017 Affordable Housing Application Questions and Answers

PO Box 350 Willimantic, Connecticut (860) Connecticut Ave, NW Suite 709 Washington, DC (202)

Understanding Your Options for Care. in a Nursing Home or Assisted Living Facility

SUPPORTING WELL INFORMED CONSUMERS: THE ROLE OF THE LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN

Operations/ Quality Improvement Track

Care Plan Oversight Policy Annual Approval Date

LONG TERM CARE SETTINGS

The Hartford Silberman Center of Excellence in Aging and Diversity at Hunter College

Assisted Living and Nursing Home Issues

Improving Resident Care: A look at CMS quality of care initiatives

Customer Centric Programming

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC The Honorable Henry Waxman. Chairman. House Energy & Commerce

FDA SEATTLE DISTRICT REGULATORY UPDATE

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: The General Assembly hereby finds and declares that:

Virginia s Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program

DC LONG TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN

Rights in Residential Settings

Uniform Consumer Information Guide

Ombudsman Program Outcome Measures

December 15, 1995 No. 17

Connecticut. Phone. Agency (860) Department of Public Health, Health Care Quality and Safety, Facility Licensing & Investigations Section

Presented by. Elaine Poker-Yount Visiting Angels East Valley

Choosing Choosing Choosing Guide to Choosing a Nursing Home Choosing Choosing Choosing

INCLUSION & EXCLUSION POLICY FOR THE ADRC AND BOULDERCOUNTYHELP.ORG SERVICE DIRECTORY APPLICATION

Creating Home in the Nursing Home: A National Symposium on Culture Change and the Environment Requirements

From EHR Implementation to Attestation: Auditing and Monitoring Meaningful Use

Transcription:

Assuring Quality in Assisted Living: Guidelines for Federal and State Policy, State Regulations, and Operations A Report To The U.S. Senate Special Committee On Aging From The Assisted Living Workgroup April 2003

A special thanks to Amy E. Waye and Carmen Diaz of the National Center for Assisted Living and Bradley Schurman of the American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging for designing and producing the ALW report. Page 2 April 2003

Acknowledgements The ALW work would not have been possible without the hard work and commitment from all the participants. Besides the work commitment, participants also bore the expense of long distance conference calls, and for some long distance travel. Many participants took on added responsibilities by serving as ALW co-facilitators and on the Steering Committee and co-chairing topic groups. Other participants were very generous with providing meeting space, meals, long distance calls, and copying. The ALW participants also appreciate the speakers who presented research and information including Susan Kayser, Michael Allen, Kathleen Murphy, Richard Powers, and Catherine Hawes. Special thanks goes to the American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging for their generous commitment of providing the 'temporary home' of the ALW including: meeting space for monthly meetings, topic group meetings and Steering Committee meetings; hosting the ALW website; long distance telephone for hundreds of hours of conference calls; copying and printing; gallons of coffee and soft drinks; and the unfailing helpful and responsive staff support. Special thanks also goes to the National Center for Assisted Living for providing the expertise and staff support to create the final report. Thanks also go to the many ALW participants who assisted in the formidable editing process. Finally, thanks to Doug Pace of AAHSA. Much of what the ALW accomplished would not have been possible without his affable and directed meeting facilitation skills. This was a unique process, and all who participated are appreciated for the countless hours spent over the past 18 months to make the content of this report possible. Cover artwork, titled "All American," was done by Lamberto Hechanova a resident of a long term care residence in Jamaica, New York. Page 3 April 2003

Assisted Living Workgroup Participating Organizations ACCREDITING ORGANIZATIONS CARF-CCAC Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations AGING/LONG TERM CARE ORGANIZATIONS American Geriatrics Society National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys National Adult Family Care Organization National Association of Professional Geriatric Care Managers National Council on Aging Pioneer Network CONSUMER ADVOCATES AARP American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging Alzheimer's Association Consumer Consortium on Assisted Living Center for Medicare Advocacy National Association of Local Long Term Care Ombudsmen National Association of State Ombudsman Programs National Association for Continence National Citizens Coalition for Nursing Home Reform National Committee for the Prevention of Elder Abuse National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare National Senior Citizens Law Center NCB Development Corporation, The Coming Home Program DISABILITY COMMUNITY National Multiple Sclerosis Society Paralyzed Veterans of America United Cerebral Palsy HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS American Academy of Home Care Physicians American Assisted Living Nurses Association American College of Health Care Administrators American Medical Directors Association American Occupational Therapy Association American Physical Therapy Association American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Consultant Dietitians in Health Care Facilities National Association of Activity Professionals National Association of Social Workers National Network of Career Nursing Assistants National Conference of Gerontological Nurse Practitioners National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization PROVIDER ASSOCIATIONS American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging American Association of Service Coordinators American Seniors Housing Association Assisted Living Federation of America Catholic Health Association of the United States National Association for Home Care National Center for Assisted Living REGULATOR ASSOCIATIONS Association of Health Facility Survey Agencies National Association for Regulatory Administration STATE/LOCAL GOVERNMENT National Association of State Units on Aging OTHER American Institute of Architects Page 4 April 2003

Assisted Living Workgroup Steering Committee AARP American Assisted Living Nurses Association American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging American Medical Directors Association American Seniors Housing Association Assisted Living Federation of America Association of Health Facility Survey Agencies Consumer Consortium on Assisted Living National Association of State Ombudsmen Programs National Center for Assisted Living National Citizens Coalition for Nursing Home Reform The NCB Development Corporation/Coming Home Project Pioneer Network Page 5 April 2003

Page 6 April 2003

Assuring Quality in Assisted Living: Guidelines for Federal and State Policy, State Regulation, and Operations Table of Contents Acknowledgements...3 Participating Organizations...4 Steering Committee Organizations...5 Introduction...8 Topic Group Recommendations Definition and Core Principles...11 Accountability and Oversight...23 Affordability...55 Direct Care Services...119 Medication Management...169 Operations...225 Resident Rights...263 Staffing...303 Appendices Appendix A: Best Practices/Operational Models...343 Appendix B: List of Recommendations by Topic Group...365 Appendix C: Glossary of Terms...375 Page 7 April 2003

Introduction As a result of the April 2001 hearing held by the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, committee staff members asked assisted living stakeholders to develop recommendations designed to ensure more consistent quality in assisted living services nationwide. The primary directive was to be inclusive and permit any interested national organization to participate in the endeavor. Shortly thereafter, a core group of assisted living stakeholders extended invitations to numerous national organizations. Subsequently, the Assisted Living Workgroup formed with nearly 50 organizations representing providers, consumers, long term care and health care professionals, regulators and accrediting bodies. Meetings on assisted living and the development of recommendations began in Fall 2001. The ALW identified overarching interests or principles that all topic groups were to consider. Those interests were: Quality Indicators Facility Size Dementia Care Research Outcome Measures Best Practices Accountability Affordability Regulations & Legislation Much of the ALW s early work focused on developing the rules and processes under which the ALW would operate, including a four-stage approval process for recommendations. After much discussion, it was decided that a two-thirds majority vote of the participating organizations present (or through written proxy) at a full ALW meeting was necessary to move a recommendation forward to the next stage of the ALW s four-stage approval process. Many recommendations were significantly modified as they moved through the development stages. Each approved recommendation was voted on at least three times by the organizational representatives present at the full monthly ALW meetings. The chapters in this report are organized by ALW topic group. In each chapter, both recommendations that received a two-thirds majority vote of the ALW participating organizations voting at the meeting and those that did not are included. Recommendations receiving two-thirds majority support appear first in each chapter; recommendations that did not receive two-thirds majority support follow. Voting records are included for all approved recommendations and for those that failed in the last stage of the ALW voting process (on the third and final vote). Recommendations that failed earlier in the ALW process are included but do not have voting records. Finally, it should be noted that an organization was allowed to change its initial vote on a recommendation after the full report was compiled. However, the ALW determined that such vote changes would not affect whether the recommendation is listed as receiving a two-thirds majority. The ALW also allowed participating organizations to submit supplemental positions on any recommendation published in this report. Supplemental positions were limited to 500 words and required a minimum of two organizational signatories. Page 8 April 2003

Finally, the appendices at the end of the report include three additional resources. Many topic groups made recommendations for operational models or best practices that have been included as Appendix A. These recommendations were not voted on by the full ALW, but are included for the reader s information. Appendix B is a list of recommendations by topic group. Appendix C is a glossary of terms used in the report. This report was requested by the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, but is intended to be useful to a broad range of stakeholders, including: policymakers at the federal and state levels; agencies at the federal and state levels that are involved in service delivery, regulation, quality monitoring and enforcement, and providing public subsidies; consumers and their families; assisted living providers; health and long term care professionals, such as nurses, medical directors, pharmacists, social workers, activity directors, nutritionists, etc.; insurers, both public and private; financiers, both public and private; and public policy researchers. Contact Information For further information about the ALW, please check the Web site, alworkgroup.org, or send an e-mail with questions to info@alworkgroup.org. Written inquiries can be addressed to Assisted Living Workgroup, 2519 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20008. Page 9 April 2003

Page 10 April 2003