School Safety Threats Persist, Funding Decreasing:

Similar documents
Lee County Sheriff s Office. Youth Services Division

Kansas Board of Regents Student Advisory Committee Student Gun Policy Opinion Survey

Testimony Robert E. O Connor, MD, MPH House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform June 22, 2007

Research Supporting ALICE

8/15/2016 THREAT ASSESSMENT: THE ACTIVE SHOOTER RISK OBJECTIVES RECENT NEWS K DON EDWARDS DO. Understand what the past has shown us

Cleveland Police Deployment

SCHOOL CRISIS, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, AND MEDICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

CASE STUDY Regarding Healthcare Facility s Duty to Provide Workplace Violence Training to All Workers.

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 375-X-2 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF ASSISTANT DIRECTORS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Tidewater Community College Crisis and Emergency Management Plan Appendix F Emergency Operations Plan. Annex 8 Active Threat Response

District Police, Protective Services & Communcations

AN EVERBRIDGE SOLUTION EVOLVING RISKS FOR CAMPUS EVENTS: CRITICAL CONCEPTS IN COMMUNICATIONS

PRESS RELEASE. Chester County Law Enforcement Is Prepared for Active Threat Incidents

Active Shooter Preparedness

(U//FOUO) Recent Active Shooter Incidents Highlight Need for Continued Vigilance

Prepared and Supportive Schools

District-wide School Safety Plan

GREENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL. By the Order Of: Mark Holtzman, Chief of Police Date Reissued: 11/28/17 Page 1 of 8

SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICY AND PLAN ZERO TOLERANCE OF WORKPLACE VIOLENCE

MSSU Campus Police Annual Report. Table of Contents

It s not just part of the job. James Phillips MD BIDMC Emergency Medicine Harvard Medical School

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

State Emergency Management and Homeland Security: A Changing Dynamic By Trina R. Sheets

Federal Funding for Homeland Security. B Border and transportation security Encompasses airline

IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED FY 2005 BUDGET ON STATE & LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

Albert Bahn. Alice Training Institute

Active Shooter Conference LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSPECTIVE

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

FY2010 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Asset Management and Risk Control Forum

City of Waterbury Safety & Security Assessment

A Brief Overview of The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Massachusetts Nurses Association Congress on Health and Safety And Workplace Violence and Abuse Prevention Task Force

ATHLETICS HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATOR HANDBOOK. A Guide for Designated Athletics Health Care Administrators

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AT PENN

How Safe Are You? Responding to the Challenge of Workplace Violence

Mandatory School Safety Plans Practical Considerations

Department of Criminal Justice Services. Virginia Center for School & Campus Safety. Virginia School Boards Association September 20, 2018

Emergency Services in the Greater Amherst Area

Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 2

Executive Policy Group Emergency Operations Center (EOC) (staffed by the Emergency Planning Group) Command Post Operations Initial Response

FLORIDA UNIVERSITY CHIEFS OF POLICE

Statement of. Michael P. Downing Assistant Commanding Officer Counter-Terrorism/Criminal Intelligence Bureau Los Angeles Police Department.

CRS Report for Congress

Documenting the Use of Force

State Homeland Security Program. Administered by the Wyoming Office of Homeland Security HOME hls.wyo.gov

Hospital Violence Prevention Self Assesment Tool. Chubb Healthcare Hospital Violence Prevention Self -Assesment Tool

Dial Code Grey Pip3 Male Side This Is The Head Nurse

Active Shooter Preparedness Research Report

2015 Forces of Change Assessment Report LICKING COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

North Carolina Information Sharing and Analysis Center NCISAAC

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO OFFICE OF THE CITY AUDITOR. Audit of San Antonio Police Department. Crisis Response Team Operations. Project No.

Appendix E Checklist for Campus Safety and Security Compliance

THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary EMBARGOED UNTIL THE START OF THE PRESIDENT S REMARKS January 16, 2013

Lone Working Policy. For. Ringstead Parish Council

UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO

EMERGENCY RESPONSE FOR SCHOOLS Checklists

This course should take approximately 15 minutes to complete. If you have any questions, please contact the appropriate number listed on the screen.

file:///s:/web FOLDER/New Web/062602berger.htm TESTIMONY Statement of Chief Bill Berger

EXAMPLE. Graduate Research. Cap-Haiten, Haiti. Mar , 2016 Jan. 20, 2016 RISK MITIGATION PLAN. Disease, including Malaria, Hepatitis, Typhoid.

The BAMSI CSST, under the guidance of the CSST Director, is responsible for the following:

Campus Safety: GOAL 2010

Respond to an Active Shooter

Hospital Security and Active Shooter Situations. May 21, Mark A. Hart, CHSP, CHPA

INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. June 7, 2016 BPC #

BOMB THREAT RESPONSE HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE. Contents

Chairman Wolf, Ranking Member Fattah and Members of the Subcommittee,

Certified Armed Protection Specialist (CAPS) Program. Instructors: BSIS approved instructors with firearms, baton, taser instructor certification.

Annex D - Active Shooter

L Ecole Culinaire Memphis

3/1/2018. Workplace Violence Prevention Webinar Introduction


AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF DELEGATES. Firearm-Related Injury and Death: Adopt a Call to Action

Workplace Violence Prevention. Sandra Williams Director of Environmental Health & Safety Alameda Health System September 6, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY... 1 BACKGROUND... 2 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Security Report Distribution...

Offensive Operations: Crippling Al-Qaeda. MSG H.A. McVicker. United States Army Sergeants Major Academy. Class 58. SGM Feick.

Introduction. District Safe Schools Coordinator /Chief Emergency Officer. Section I: General Considerations and Planning Guidelines

HALL GREEN SCHOOL. LOCKDOWN PROCEDURES July Adopted: 25 May 2016 Next Review: July 2017 Next Review: July Mrs J Owen Chair of Governors

Violence Prevention and Reporting of Incidents

School Safety Audit Checklist

WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PREVENTION. Health Care and Social Service Workers

Presented by: Nickole Winnett, Esq. Jackson Lewis P.C. (703) September 17, 2015

Active Violence and Mass Casualty Terrorist Incidents

THE CLERY ACT: Amendments in the Violence Against Women Act of 2013

Sam Houston State University ANNEX A WARNING ANNEX A WARNING, JUNE

MANUAL OF PROCEDURE I. PURPOSE

Talking Openly About Concealed Carry on Campus

Policy 3.19 Workplace Violence and Threat Assessment Team

A FRAMEWORK FOR MAKING HOSPITALS A SAFER WORKPLACE FREE FROM WORKPLACE VIOLENCE

Corporal James Browning

SKYLINE REGIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACADEMY TRAINING SCHEDULE Hours are 4-10 Hr Days, schedule subject to change - updated October 2, 2017

December 17, 2003 Homeland Security Presidential Directive/Hspd-8

Presented by Chief Anne P. Glavin Chief of Police California State University, Northridge. PacWest SFS Conference San Diego May 13, 2015

ACTIVE SHOOTER HOW TO RESPOND

Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018

CAMPUS CARRY POLICY. July, 2016

Protecting the Workplace from Human Based Threats

systemic issues are documented and incorporated into the training schedules.

Transcription:

School Safety Threats Persist, Funding Decreasing: NASRO 2003 National School-Based Law Enforcement Survey Final Report on the 3 rd Annual National Survey of School-Based Police Officers August 19, 2003 for the National Association of School Resource Officers (NASRO) Curtis Lavarello, Executive Director Direct: (941) 232-4633 Email: Resourcer@aol.com Web Site: www.nasro.org Report prepared by Kenneth S. Trump, M.P.A. President National School Safety and Security Services Cleveland, Ohio Office: (216) 251-3067 Email: kentrump@aol.com Web Site: www.schoolsecurity.org Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved.

Dedication Our nation today faces threats to public safety that are greater than ever before in modern history. Our schools, as reflections of their broader communities, also face increasing threats to the safety of their students and staff. These threats include internal threats originating from sources within the schoolhouse itself, and external threats from forces often originating far outside of schoolyard grounds. This report is dedicated to the School Resource Officers (SROs) who protect our students, school personnel, educational facilities, and school-communities regardless of the source and nature of these threats. This report is further dedicated to the memory of School Resource Officer Ronald Wood, of the West Jordan (Utah) Police Department, who made the ultimate sacrifice this past school year. Officer Wood will be remembered as a friend of countless young people, law enforcement officers, and school staff. Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 1

Table of Contents Dedication 1 Table of Contents 2 Methodology 3 Executive Summary 4 Detailed Survey Results 8 Appendix 1 (2001 NASRO Survey Highlights) 19 Appendix 2 (2002 NASRO Survey Highlights) 20 Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 2

2003 NASRO National Survey of School-Based Police Officers August 19, 2003 Methodology The National Association of School Resource Officers (NASRO) contracted independent professional services for the development, administration, and analysis of NASRO s third annual professional industry survey of school-based police officers. Surveys were independently administered by the staff of National School Safety and Security Services, tallied by Scantron Corporation, and the results analyzed and reported by Kenneth S. Trump, President of National School Safety and Security Services, an independent, non-product affiliated national school safety consulting firm. The 20-question survey instrument was developed in May of 2003 and administered to attendees of the 13 th Annual NASRO Conference held in Orlando, Florida, on June 29 July 4, 2003. 1,100 surveys were distributed to conference attendees upon their registration. A total of 728 surveys were tallied by Scantron Corporation, representing a return rate of approximately 66%. Whereas every respondent did not answer every question, the total number of respondents for each question will be shown with the chart for each question. NASRO conferences provide the largest single yearly gathering of SROs and offer the greatest cross-section of officers with representatives from each of the 50 United States. The results from surveys administered at NASRO conferences represent the largest known bodies of data derived from school-based police officers in the world, with the 2003 survey representing the largest return (total of 728) of the three annual surveys conducted to date. This is a professional industry survey. NASRO membership surveys are intentionally not designed as, nor are they represented as, long-term scientific academic research studies. NASRO does believe the survey to be reliable and valid as a representative cross-section and subsection of NASRO s membership. Scientific research studies typically involve years of time for their design, implementation, analysis, and validation through professional debate and subsequent research testing. NASRO believes that its membership surveys provide timely, concrete real time data reflecting today s current school safety threats, trends, and resource needs identified by those professionals currently working on the frontlines of schools to protect America s school children and educators. Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 3

Executive Summary This Executive Summary highlights key survey findings and conclusions from the 2003 NASRO 3 rd National Annual Survey of School-Based Police Officers. Detailed findings and graphic illustrations follow this section of the report. KEY FINDINGS Significant findings from this survey include: School safety threats continue to persist from both within, and outside of, our nation s schools. Over 90% of the survey respondents believe that schools are soft targets for potential terrorist attacks. Over 70% of the officers reported that aggressive behavior in elementary school children has increased in their districts in the past five years. School-based police officers reported that significant gaps continue to exist in their schools emergency preparedness planning and, in training for terrorism and other crisis situations. Over 76% of the officers feel that their schools are not adequately prepared to respond to a terrorist attack upon their schools. Over 51% of the respondents schools do not have specific, formal guidelines to follow when there is a change in the national homeland security color code/federal terrorism warning system. Over 55% of the respondents said that their school crisis plans are not adequate. Over 62% of survey respondents reported that their school crisis plans have not been adequately exercised (tabletop exercises, full scale drills, etc.). Over 71% of the respondents report that their schools teachers, administrators, in-house (civilian, non-school police) security personnel, and support staff have not received terrorism-specific training. Almost 47% of the school-based officers themselves have not received any terrorism-specific training related to their role as a school-based police officer. Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 4

Crimes occurring on school campuses nationwide are underreported to law enforcement and the current federal No Child Left Behind Act requirement for states to define persistently dangerous schools will lead to further underreporting of school crime. The vast majority of respondents also believe that Congress should enact a federal mandatory K-12 school crime reporting law. Over 87% of school-based police officers reported that the numbers of crimes that occur on school campuses nationwide are underreported to police. Over 61% of survey respondents believe that school administrators faced with their schools possibly being labeled as persistently dangerous will result in decreased school crime reporting. Over 88% of respondents believe the Congress should enact a federal law requiring mandatory, consistent school crime reporting for K-12 schools nationwide. A significant percentage of School Resource Officers reported budget cuts for school safety funding in their local school districts, inadequacies in federal school safety funding, and the need for an Education Homeland Security Act to fund school terrorism training, improve security and crisis planning, and support SRO programs. Over 41% of school-based police officers report that funding for school safety in their schools is decreasing. Over 85% of the survey respondents believe that the U.S. Department of Education s 2004 proposed budget cut of 35% ($50 million) for state funding of the Safe and Drug Free Schools program will contribute to schools being less safe. Almost 64% of the respondents believe that the U.S. Department of Education s recently announced $38 million in emergency planning grants (to be awarded to an estimated total of 150 local education agencies) is inadequate. 95% of the survey respondents believe that a Congressional Education Homeland Security Act to fund SRO and school staff terrorism training, improve security and crisis planning, and support SRO staffing would make schools more safe. *See detailed results starting on page 8 for additional survey questions not listed above. Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 5

CONCLUSIONS An analysis of the 2003 survey data found that significant school safety threats persist, the source of such threats being both internal (school violence/ aggressive behavior) and external (terrorism). The majority of school-based officers continue to indicate that their schools emergency preparedness plans and training are not adequate. The majority of respondents also reported that school crimes nationwide are underreported and that they are likely to be further underreported with the existence of new federally-imposed requirements for states to create definitions of persistently dangerous schools. The data suggestion that school safety threats persist with no significant changes in emergency preparedness and training to deal with emergency situations should, standing alone, present public officials with serious concern. It would be expected that even if safety threats themselves did not decline, the preparedness level of schools should have improved, especially following the spate of highprofile school shootings of recent years and the terrorist attacks on America on 9/11. Yet less than one month away from the two-year anniversary of 9/11, and roughly six years since the first in the series of high profile school shootings, we find very significant percentages of school-based police officers telling us that the threats to school safety are ever-strong and that preparedness levels for responding to school crises remain significantly inadequate. Most concerning is the finding that while the threats persist, funding for school safety is declining in a significant percentage of local schools (41%) and the federal government is proposing further cuts (35%, i.e., $50 million) to state allocations for Safe and Drug Free School program funding, which front-line safety officials report as likely to contribute to schools becoming even less safe. Survey respondents also feel that the U.S. Department of Education s recently announced $38 million in emergency planning grants, to be distributed among an estimated total of 150 local education agencies, is inadequate, a finding which is consistent with respondent reports of the significant gaps yet to be addressed in their current emergency planning and training. Local and federal funding cuts to school safety are significant and appear likely to continue, yet the majority of respondents (95%) clearly feel that just the opposite is needed, i.e., additional funding for terrorism-related training for school officials, improved security and crisis planning, and strengthened SRO programs. Public policy and funding trends are clearly headed in the opposite direction of what front-line school safety officials are saying is needed. It is illogical for public officials to cut school safety funding in general. It is even more illogical for them to cut school safety funding while over 90% of the school-based police officers feel that schools are soft targets for terrorist attack, and while public officials provide heightened funding for security practices elsewhere, including in their own legislative halls, and in airports and other government facilities. Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 6

In NASRO s 2002 annual survey almost a year ago, this evaluator recommended that: NASRO should strongly encourage federal, state, and local education and public safety agencies, as well as elected and appointed public officials, to include schools in meaningful terrorism and homeland security planning, and in related resource allocations. NASRO should encourage and support meaningful legislative and programmatic initiatives geared toward assisting schools in collaborating more closely with SROs and other public safety agencies in improving school security policies, procedures, and programs, and in developing, revising, and testing emergency/crisis plans. NASRO should encourage and support meaningful initiatives to fund and implement greater training opportunities for school-based police officers as first responders to terrorist attacks, as well as for expanded overall specialized training for SROs and SRO supervisors. NASRO should maintain an awareness campaign on the findings and issues in this survey by encouraging national education and public safety organizations to disseminate the survey findings, and accurate information on best practices in school-based policing in general, nationwide within their respective professional communities. The evaluator recommends once again that NASRO continue pursuing the goals. However, the evaluator is not alone in making such recommendations. Over 97% of NASRO members responding in this year s 2003 survey indicated that NASRO should be a vocal, national advocate for additional school safety resources and SRO programs. But the responsibility for improvement rests far beyond the front-line members of NASRO and the organization s leaders. The data suggests that it is time, perhaps even well past the time, for our nation s public officials to take concrete policy and funding steps for heightened and sustained school safety funding, improved school crime reporting requirements, and measures which strengthen and sustain ongoing school safety, security, and emergency planning. Unfortunately, the data suggests that our public officials appear to currently be heading in the opposite direction. Heightened awareness and preparedness in our schools, like that advocated elsewhere across our nation, will reduce terrorism fears and the threats from within our own schoolhouses and school communities, while enhancing our school safety prevention and preparedness levels. Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 7

Detailed Survey Results This section expands upon the Executive Summary with percentages, number of responses (in parenthesis), and graphics of responses for each survey question. *Percentages are based on valid responses and may vary 1% due to rounding. Terrorism & School Violence Threats Do you believe schools are "soft targets" for potential terrorist attacks? Yes 90.2% (645) No 9.8% (70) Total Responses: 715 In the past five years, has aggressive behavior in elementary school children in your district: Increased 70.5% (486) Remained the same 22.5% (155) Total Responses: 689 Decreased 7% (48) Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 8

Terrorism & Overall Emergency Preparedness Do you feel that the school(s) within your district are adequately prepared to respond to a terrorist attack upon the school(s)? Yes 23.9% (169) No 76.1% (537) Total Responses: 706 Does your school have specific, formal guidelines to follow when there is a change in the national homeland security color code / federal terrorism warning system? Yes 35% (247) No 51.3% (362) Unknown 13.7% (97) Total Responses: 706 Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 9

In your opinion, are crisis plans for your school(s) adequate? Yes 44.5% (309) No 55.5% (386) Total Responses: 695 Have crisis plans for your school been adequately exercised (tabletop exercises, full scale drills, etc.)? No 62% (428) Yes 38% (262) Total Responses: 690 Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 10

Have you personally received any terrorism-specific training related to your role as a school-based police officer? No 46.7% (328) Yes 53.3% (375) Total Responses: 703 If you have in-house school security personnel at your school, have they received any terrorism-specific training related to their role as school security personnel? No 71.3% (308) Yes 28.7% (124) Total Responses: 432 Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 11

Have other school employees (teachers, administrators, and non-security/non-police) received any terrorism-specific training related to their roles as school personnel? Yes 28.4% (196) No 71.6% (495) Total Responses: 691 Do you believe that student use of cell phones in schools during a crisis would: Improve School Safety 19.1% (135) Decrease School Safety 64.3% (455) Have No Impact on School Safety 16.7% (118) Total Responses: 708 Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 12

School Crime Reporting & Underreporting Do you believe that, in general, the number of crimes that occur on school campuses nationwide are: Underreported to police 87.2% (618) Accurately reported to police 10.6% (75) Over-reported to police 2.3% (16) Total Responses: 709 The federal "No Child Left Behind" law requires each state to create a definition of a "persistently dangerous school." Will school administrators, faced with their schools possibly being labeled as "persistently dangerous," result in: Improved School Crime Reporting 25.3% (176) Decreased School Crime Reporting 61.1% (426) Have No Impact on School Crime Reporting 13.6% (95) Total Responses: 697 Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 13

Do you believe that Congress should enact a federal law requiring mandatory, consistent school crime reporting for K-12 schools nationwide? Yes 88.3% (602) No 11.7% (80) Total Responses: 682 Budget & Funding Issues Is funding for school safety in your school: Decreasing 41.1% (297) Remaining the same 32% (231) Increasing 10.5% (76) Unknown 16.3% (118) Total Responses: 722 Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 14

The U.S. Department of Education's 2004 proposed budget has a $50 million (35%) decrease in state funding for Safe and Drug Free Schools programs. Do you believe this budget cut would contribute to: Schools Being Safer 5.8% (42) Schools Being Less Safe 85.4% (619) Have No Impact on School Safety 8.8% (64) Total Responses: 725 The U.S. Department of Education recently announced $38 million in emergency planning grants to be awarded to an estimated total of 150 local education agencies. Do you believe this amount of grant funding is: Too Much 1.1% (8) Inadequate 63.8% (459) Adequate 35.1% (253) Total Responses: 720 Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 15

NASRO has called upon Congress to create an "Education Homeland Security Act" to fund SRO and school staff terrorism training, improve security and crisis planning, and support SRO staffing. Do you believe such a law would: Have No Impact on School Safety 4.5% (32) Make Schools More Safe 95% (680) Make Schools Less Safe.05% (4) Total Responses: 716 Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 16

SRO Program & NASRO Issues In general, do you believe that having a regular, routine rotation (change) of personnel in a SRO position for any one school: Has a Negative Impact on the SRO Program and School Safety 74.7% (522) Has No Impact on the SRO Program and School Safety 7.4% (52) Improves the SRO Program and School Safety 17.9% (125) Total Responses: 699 Do you believe that NASRO should: NASRO Should Not Be Involved at All in Advocating Nationally for Additional School Safety Resources and SRO Programs.6% (4) Be a Vocal, National Advocate for Additional School Safety Resources and SRO Programs 97.3% (688) Remain Neutral and Not Speak Out Publicly for Additional School Safety Issues and SRO Programs 2.1% (15) Total Responses: 707 Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 17

Position of Survey Respondents: Law Enforcement Supervisor of School Resource Officers 16.3% (119) School Resource Officer (non-supervisor) 83.7% (609) Total Responses: 728 Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 18

APPENDIX 1 2001 NASRO School Resource Officer Survey Highlights (based on a July, 2001, national survey of 689 school-based police officers) SROs Prevent Serious, Violent Crime * 92% report preventing 1 to 25 violent acts per school year * Over 94% state that students have reported to them violent acts or similar safety threats that the students believed were going to occur for an estimated total of 11,155 cases (average of 17 per officer) in their careers as SROs * 67% report having prevented a school faculty or staff member from being assaulted by a student or other individual on campus for an estimated total 3,200 cases (average of 7 per officer) SROs Improve School Crime Reporting * 84% of SROs believe that crimes on school campuses nationwide are underreported to police. * 86% report that the presence of a SRO on campus improves the accuracy of school crime reporting SROs Confiscate Weapons in Schools * 24% report having taken a loaded firearm from a student or other individual on campus for a total estimated 344 guns * 87% report having taken knives or other bladed weapons from students or others for a total of 6,100 SROs Primarily Focus on Prevention-Oriented Tasks * 91% report at least half of their job consisting of preventative duties. Only 7% said the majority of their emphasis is on enforcement and investigations. * Over 81% report following the Triad SRO program model of counselor, law officer and classroom instructor Tasks Performed by School Resource Officers % of Officers One-on-one counseling with students 93% Calls for service to classrooms 88% Classroom instruction 87% Crisis preparedness planning 83% Security audits/assessments of school campuses 82% Special safety programs/presentations 78% Faculty/staff in-service presentations 75% Truancy intervention 70% Group counseling with students 69% Supervising/coordinating non-athletic 60% extracurriculars Field trip chaperone 57% Parent organization presentations 57% Coaching athletic programs 30% Data extracted from 2001 NASRO School Resource Officer Survey independently administered and evaluated by National School Safety and Security Services <www.schoolsecurity.org> copyright 2001, NSSSS; all rights reserved Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 19

APPENDIX 2 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Web Site: www.nasro.org National office located in Sarasota County, Florida 2002 NASRO SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS 658 attendees of July, 2002, NASRO Conference participated; Number of responses to each question may be found in full report; Full report available at www.nasro.org; Copyright 2002, NASRO; all rights reserved KEY OVERALL FINDINGS An overwhelming majority (95%) of school-based police officers feel that their schools are vulnerable to a terrorist attack and a substantial percentage of officers (79%) do not feel that schools within their districts are adequately prepared to respond to a terrorism attack upon their schools. The majority of School Resource Officers reported that significant gaps exist in their schools security, that their school crisis plans are inadequate, and that their school crisis plans are either untested or inadequately tested and exercised. School-based officers have received limited training and minimal support from outside agencies (local, state and federal) in preparing for a terrorist attack upon their schools. The vast majority of SROs also reported that their in-house school security personnel, school administrators, teachers, and support staff have received no terrorism-specific training. Additionally, SROs reported decreasing opportunities for their overall training, especially since 9/11, with many limitations attributed to a lack of funding. SPECIFIC SURVEY DATA HIGHLIGHTS; 95% of school-based officers described their schools as vulnerable to a terrorist attack. 32% of those survey respondents described their schools as "very vulnerable" while an additional 63% characterized their schools as "somewhat vulnerable." Only 5% felt that their schools were either not vulnerable or were already prepared for a terrorist attack. 79% of the school officers stated that their schools are not adequately prepared to respond to a terrorist attack. Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 20

Only 22% of the surveyed school resource officers described themselves as "very prepared" as a first-responder to a terrorist attack upon their school. 55% of the officers reported that they have not received terrorism-specific training related to their roles as school-based officers. Officers reported that of those schools having in-house school security personnel, 82% of these (non-police) security personnel had not received any terrorism-specific training. 77% of the respondents also reported that teachers, administrators, and support staff in their schools have not received terrorism-specific training. 55% of the respondents felt that their schools' crisis plans were not adequate. 52% of the school resource officers reported that these crisis plans have never been tested and exercised, and in those schools where plans have been tested, the amount and/or type of testing has not been adequate, according to 62% of the respondents. 55% of school resource officers said that their schools do not have mail handling procedures for dealing with anthrax scares and other suspicious packages. 96% of the surveyed school officers described gaining access to their outside schools grounds during school hours as either very easy (74%) or somewhat easy (22%). 83% of the officers described gaining access to inside their school as very easy (37%) or somewhat easy (46%). Almost 40% said their schools have not had a formal professional security assessment conducted in the past five years. 68% of school-based officers believe that student use of cell phones in school would detract from school safety in a crisis and another 10% believe they would have neither a positive or negative influence. 81% of school resource officers indicated that their schools continue to not allow students to use cell phones in school. 74% of school officers reported that their schools do not educate parents, and communicate effectively with parents, on school safety, security, and crisis planning issues. 89% of school-based officers believe that crimes occurring on school campuses nationwide are underreported to the police, while 91% believe that the presence of a police officer on campus improves the accuracy of school crime reporting. 66% of the school-based officers were not able to attend training even though they had a demonstrated need and 75% of the officers indicated that they have not been able to attend needed training due to a lack of funding. Almost one-third reported that their opportunity to attend specialized training has decreased since 9/11. # Copyright 2003, NSSSS. All rights reserved. 21