Department of Defense Environmental Management Systems Workshop

Similar documents
Department of Defense

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. 1. PURPOSE. In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) (Reference (a)), this Instruction:

Federal Electronics Stewardship

The Department of Defense Executive Order 13423: Agency-Level Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals Reduction Plan

Defense Logistics Agency Instruction

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 20 JULY 1994

Fort Devens EMS Environmental Management System

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM FOR SECURITY AND INDEPENDENCE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INTRODUCTION COMPLIANCE WITH EXECUTIVE ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS 11

Template modified: 27 May :30 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE JULY 1994.

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L))

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Federal Facilities Environmental Stewardship and Compliance Assistance Center

Air Force Enterprise Corrosion Prevention and Control Strategic Plan

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Compliance Appendix E: Compliance Budget Overview

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES DEFENSE ACQUISITION REFORM PANEL UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

The Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

DOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES. Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate

COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense

Implementation of the North Texas Regional Environmental Management System Partnership

Directorate of Environmental Integration, U.S. Army Engineer School COL Robert S. Kirsch

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Move from individual initiatives to enterprise-wide synchronization across multiple lines of operations

Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (ODASA) for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) NAOC.

Analysis of the Tri-service Pollution Prevention Programs, Comparison of Characteristics, and Recommendations for Improvement

Department of the Navy Annual Review of Acquisition of Services Policy and Oversight

DoD Safety & Occupational Health

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense. Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan FY 2016

Department of Defense Sustainable Procurement Policies and Supportive Initiatives

THE JOINT STAFF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DoD Audit Readiness Progress

MCASY FY2008 Secretary of Defense and Secretary of the Navy Environmental Award Narrative

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Management of Environmental Compliance at Overseas Installations

JUDGING CRITERIA U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command, G-4 E-Team

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

Fiscal Year 2012 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

Guest Presenter Jay Bottelson

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

National E3 Webinar Summit March 6, 2013

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

The Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure. - An Overview - JSEM US Army Installation Geospatial. US Air Force GeoBase

Environmental Awards

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Single Manager Responsibility for Military Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology and Training (EODT&T)

Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

THE JOINT STAFF Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide

System Safety in Systems Engineering DAU Continuous Learning Module

Department of Defense

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L))

Introduction. Background. Environmental Excellence in Weapon System Acquisition, Small Team Fairchild Air Force Base

Navy Non-DERP (Other Accrued) Environmental Liabilities (OEL) ~ Development and Outcomes

DOD MANUAL ACCESSIBILITY OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (ICT)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Department of Defense. Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act. Statement of Assurance. Fiscal Year 2014 Guidance

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FEDERAL PROCUREMENT DATA SYSTEM (FPDS) CONTRACT REPORTING DATA IMPROVEMENT PLAN. Version 1.4

Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017

SECNAVINST B ASN (RDA) 22 Dec 2005 PRODUCT DATA REPORTING AND EVALUATION PROGRAM (PDREP)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Secretary of Defense Environmental Award Category Environmental Quality - Team

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DOD DIRECTIVE DEFENSE INSTITUTION BUILDING (DIB)

DoD DRAFT DIRECTIVE ON SPACE EXECUTIVE AGENT

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) FY 2012 OCO

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Army Sustainability Reporting. Kristie Siroonian, PMP LMI 11 May 2011

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY HEADQUARTERS 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA

Co-Sourcing Lab Services Maximizing Service Partners in a Lab Environment

GAO DEFENSE INFRASTRUCTURE. DOD Needs to Determine and Use the Most Economical Building Materials and Methods When Acquiring New Permanent Facilities

This publication is available digitally on the AFDPO WWW site at:

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY GARRISON BUILDING 1001 ROOM W321 FORT HOOD, TEXAS

Finding Funding for Energy Efficiency

Program Plan For the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Technology Account Under New York s Clean Air Interstate Rules (CAIR)

Regional Partnerships

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Information Technology Expenditure Approval Authority

This publication is available digitally on the AFDPO WWW site at:

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

Defense Industrial Base Predictive Analysis System

Air Force Ozone Depleting Chemical (ODC) Interim Waiver Application, Approval Procedures, and Reporting Requirements

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment Support. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Transcription:

Department of Defense Environmental Management Systems Workshop Lt Col Marc Hewett ODUSD(I&E)/EM 5 May 2008 Joint Services Environmental Management Conference

Overview DoD EMS Implementation Status o DoD Metric Scoring Results odod EMS Analysis o Successes/Benefits and Challenges o Best Practices and Lessons Learned DoD EMS Instruction/Policy DoD EMS Path Forward Executive Order 13423 Implementation o Integration Structure o EMS and EO Goals o DoD EO Policy Guidance Organizational EMS Metrics: Present and Future 2

DoD US EMS Implementation Status US Appropriate Facilities/Orgs Number of US Appropriate Facilities/Organizations with an EMS in Conformance* Number of US Appropriate Facilities/Organizations with an EMS Fully Implemented Component Number Number Percentage Number Percentage Army 139 40 28.8% 13 9.3% Navy 82 5 6.1% 5 6.1% USMC 18 9 50% 6 33.3% Air Force 153 69 45% 49 32% DLA 14 3 21.4% 3 21.4% Total 406 126 31% 76 18.7% * Conformance with Component s EMS Protocols As of: 30 September 2007 3

DoD Overseas EMS Implementation Status Overseas Appropriate Facilities/Orgs Number of Overseas Appropriate Facilities/Organizations with an EMS in Conformance* Number of Overseas Appropriate Facilities/Organizations with an EMS Fully Implemented Component Number Number Percentage Number Percentage Army 22 10 45.5% 1 4.5% Navy 21 0 0% 0 0% USMC 2 1 50% 1 50% Air Force 19 7 36.8% 2 10.5% DLA 2 0 0% 0 0% Total 66 18 27.3% 4 6% * Conformance with Component s EMS Protocols As of: 30 September 2007 4

DoD Metric Scoring Results US Appropriate Score Number of Facilities/Orgs Percent of Facilities/Orgs Overseas Score Number of Facilities/Orgs Percent of Facilities/Orgs Green 84 20.6% Yellow 193 47.4% Red 130 32% Green 11 16.7% Yellow 20 30.3% Red 35 53% DoD Total Score Number of Facilities/Orgs Percent of Facilities/Orgs Green 95 20% Yellow 213 45% Red 165 35% US Appropriate Score Reported to OMB Overseas Scores Reported Internal to DoD - FY2007 Annual EMS Report - January 2008 OMB Scorecard - Overall, DoD still Red 5

DoD EMS Analysis DoD is on track for Full Implementation by December 2009 o US Appropriate Facilities/Organizations o DoD Full Implementation Extended From Dec 2008 to Dec 2009 by the Office of Federal Environmental Executive (OFEE) EMS Progress is Improving EMS is still stove-piped into the Environmental Functions Senior Leadership buy-in and support needs improvement The Operational Impact is still vague o More data/time is likely required to evaluate how EMS interacts with mission-related issues Contract issues will require focus and potentially, additional guidance regarding sustainability criteria. 6

EMS Successes/Benefits and Challenges Benefits/Successes o Improved inter-office communication of environmental programs across the installations, and across various levels of staff. o Improved manager and employee awareness of environmental issues and how their actions can positively or negatively impact the environment. o More formal, structured, consistent approach that provided clarity on requirements, objectives, roles, and responsibilities. Challenges o Lack of leadership committed to EMS. o EMS does not seem relevant or critical for mission success. o Lack of personnel to implement the program. o Deployment and high turnover of EMS trained personnel/leadership disrupts progress. 7

EMS Best Practices/Lessons Learned Best Practices o Senior leaders must be involved and advocate EMS as an installation wide program. o Training to key personnel is essential. Lessons Learned o EMS must have top-down implementation in order to be successful. o Bottom-up implementation is also vital to success o EMS Must be implemented to support and work with the mission and value added practices. 8

EMS DoD Instruction/Policy DoD has developed an EMS DoD Instruction/Policy with the assistance of EMS Component representatives. The DoDI has been through formal comments with Components and has been reviewed by both the DoD EMS and DoD EO 13423 Implementation Working Groups. DoD has begun the DoDI coordination process and hopes to have the EMS DoDI signed for publication by December 2008. 9

EMS DoD Instruction Highlights EMS is everyone s responsibility goes beyond Environmental Functional Area EMS Conformance will be formally re-declared every three years (requires External (2 nd Party) Audit) Clarifies OSD and Component Responsibilities Requires Internal EMS Audits Energy and Transportation aspect consideration in EMS Maximize Use of Cross-Functional Teams Definitions including Appropriate Facility/Organization, Audits, Qualified parties Institutionalizes DoD EMS Work Group 10

Path Forward Achieve Full Conformance and Implementation Integrate the goals of EO 13423 into EMS Publish EMS DoD Instruction Improve EMS Awareness Outside of Environmental Functional Area 11

Questions 12

BREAK 13

Executive Order 13423 Strengthening the Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management Clarifies and strengthens role of EMS as the foundation management framework to meet the goals of the order (including compliance management) EMS objectives shall include sustainable practice goals identified in Section 2 of the EO Conformance to EO 13423 requires an External Audit by a qualified party outside the scope of the EMS 14

DoD Integration Structure Sustainability The Executive Committee and Implementation Workgroup comprise of representatives from the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and the Components. DUSD(I&E) - Chair OASD(NII)/Deputy DOD-CIO ADUSD(ESOH) DASN(I&F) ADUSD(I) DASA (ESOH) DASAF(EESOH) AF/A4/7 DP&AP OSD(C) SSE/DT&E DLA(DES-D) DASN(E) ADUSD LPS OGC(E&I) ODUSD(I&E)/EM Executive Secretary DDR&E ODUSD(I&E)/IRM Executive Secretary ODUSD(A&T) Please note there is no precedence in the order of the list above 15

EMS and the EO Goals Using EMS can help to implement the EO goals: o Avoid or reduce stove piping issues o Address the interconnections between activities and programs o Engage all necessary players o Ultimately, create more sustainable operations through resource conservations, waste/pollution avoidance, and better purchasing decisions 16

DoD EO Policy Guidance On 21 December 2007, DoD distributed a memorandum for implementing EO 13423 to Department Components o The Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment is designated as the Department s Senior Agency Official for implementing EO 13423. However, it is the entire Department s responsibility for meeting the goals and requirements of the EO, including preparing the reports required by the EO and its implementing instructions. DoD EO Gap Analysis o DoD is currently conducting a gap analysis of existing DoD Policy that meets the requirements of the EO, as well as identifying any discrepancies (e.g., DoD IT Policy vs. DoD Energy Policy) 17

Business Transformation Core Business Missions Human Resources Management Weapon System Lifecycle Management Materiel Supply and Service Management ESOH Sustainment Sustainable Operations Real Property and Installations Lifecycle Management Financial Management W a r f I g h t e r Executive Order Support Cross Cuts ALL Core Business Mission Areas and Business Enterprise Priorities 18

Organizational EMS Type of EMS Description Other Terms Used Issues/Implications Facility EMS EMS This is the traditional facility-level or site-level EMS. The scope is typically defined by a single organization, with its activities defined by a discrete fence-line. appropriate facility site EMS single-site organization EMS This could be a headquarters facility EMS, if the emphasis is on the facility operations, as opposed to the headquarters programmatic functions. Multi-Site Organization EMS EMS The scope of this EMS is a broader organization, which encompasses multiple facilities or operating units (or organizations). [They need not each constitute an appropriate facility. ] The key attribute is that the significant environmental aspects of the activities, products and services of all the units are managed as part of a single EMS. enterprise EMS corporate EMS agency-wide EMS multi-site EMS program EMS Functionally, the EMS still has to reach down to workers at all the units and activities encompassed by the organization. Audit of the EMS includes an audit at an appropriate sampling of sub-units. Higher-Tier EMS EMS EMS EMS EMS EMS Here, individual facilities (or organizations) maintain their own EMSs. However, an additional EMS is created to address issues which are best addressed at a higher level of the organization. umbrella EMS corporate EMS agency-wide EMS headquarters EMS program EMS The scope of the top tier EMS is those issues best addressed at the higher level of the organization; it does not encompass all facility-level issues. The scope and the interfaces (roles and responsibilities) between the levels need to be defined consistently from both levels. Each EMS needs to be audited. 19

EMS Metrics Scorecard Metrics o Move from implementation to operation o More focus on audits, management reviews, sustainability integration Sustainability Questions Benefits, Successes, Best Practices, Lessons Learned Metrics developed by Federal WG o Used for Annual EMS report o OMB Scorecard DoD Specific Requirement for Appropriate Facility/Organization Update to Remain 20

Future EMS Scorecard Metrics EMS metrics may include (FY2009 and beyond): o Aspects o Goals, Objectives, Targets and Programs o Operational Controls o Training o Contracts o External Audits and Declaration of Conformance *Formally EMS Audit and Evaluation Procedures o Sustainability Integration o Full implementation/conformance o Management Reviews All metrics are being updated New metrics may be previewed at the end of FY2008 metrics call o FYI and Preparation Purposes Reporting with New Metrics begins FY09 21

Contact Information DoD EMS POC: Lt Col Marc Hewett, Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) E-mail: marc.hewett@osd.mil Phone Number: 703.604.1831 22

Questions 23

Back Up Slides 24

DoD Metric Scoring Results US Appropriate Score Number of Facilities/Orgs Percent of Facilities/Orgs Overseas Score Number of Facilities/Orgs Percent of Facilities/Orgs Green 84 20.6% Yellow 193 47.4% Red 130 32% Green 11 16.7% Yellow 20 30.3% Red 35 53% DoD Total Score Number of Facilities/Orgs Percent of Facilities/Orgs Green 95 20% Yellow 213 45% Red 165 35% US Appropriate Score Reported - FY 2007 Annual EMS Report - Jan 2008 OMB Scorecard - Overall, DoD still Red 25

Department-Level Rating 2006 A Sliding Scale More Stringent Each Year G Y R At Least 70% of Facilities are Green No More than 5% of Facilities are Red No More than 20% of Facilities are Red Neither Green nor Yellow 2007 G Y R At Least 75% of Facilities are Green No More than 5% of Facilities are Red No More than 15% of Facilities are Red Neither Green nor Yellow 2008 G Y R At Least 80% of Facilities are Green No More than 5% of Facilities are Red No More than 10% of Facilities are Red Neither Green nor Yellow 26

Facility-Level Rating Constant From 2006-2008 For Green, a Facility Needs: At Least 5 D s No More than 1 B No A s at all OR At Least 4 D s No B s at all No A s at all For Yellow, a Facility Needs: At Least 4 C s (or D s) No More than 1 A For Red, a Facility is: Neither Green nor Yellow 27

EO 13423 Sustainability Goals Energy efficiency and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions Use of renewable energy Reduction in water consumption intensity Acquisition of green products and services Pollution prevention, including reduction or elimination of the use of toxic and hazardous chemical and materials Cost-effective waste prevention and recycling programs Increased diversion of solid waste Sustainable design/high performance buildings Vehicle fleet management, including the use of alternative fuel vehicles and alternative fuels and the further reduction of petroleum consumption Electronics stewardship 28

Understanding the Color Rating Green: All elements of the EMS are in place and working Yellow: Most elements are in place, but one or two areas need focused attention Red: Two or more elements are not functioning or may not be present 29