Background Information

Similar documents
Building a Regional Economic Development Blueprint:

Doctoral Dissertation Research Grant Program

Chamber of Commerce East Arapaho/Collins Task Force. Report to the Richardson City Council April 17, 2017

Regional Development Plans

The Community Development Block Grant Program and Rural Development: A Description of Awards Granted in Nebraska during Fiscal Years

A decision is expected within two weeks after proposal deadline has been reached.

Re: Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare

Stronger Economies Together

DEVELOPING A CENTER FOR NURSING SCHOLARSHIP AND LEADERSHIP IN KANSAS

FEDERAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUNDING IN OHIO: SURVEY FINDINGS

2001 Rural Development Philanthropy Baseline Survey ~ Updated on June 18, 2002

Technical Assistance Program (TAP) GUIDELINES

NCSL believes a vibrant state-federal partnership to strengthen rural America is

APPLICATION TO HOST AN AMERICAS COMPETITIVENESS EXCHANGE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (ACE)

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017

SWOT. SWOT for Fundraising. Internal. External. Strengths Weaknesses

National Collegiate Soils Contest Rules

SECTION 1: UPDATES ON 5 YEAR PLAN

An Analysis of USDA Farm Program Payments and Rural Development Funding In Low Population Growth Rural Counties

engineering salary guide

A4LE SOUTHERN REGION SR ANNUAL CONFERENCE

Work-Life Innovation

Training capacity and Rostering

PLN Action & Information Items. August 2010

2014 UPDATE. Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy EAST TEXAS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

This report describes the methods and results of an interim evaluation of the Nurse Practitioner initiative in long-term care.

INNOVATION SUPERCLUSTERS APPLICANT GUIDE

REMINDER: All proposals must be submitted to AT&T by 5:00 p.m. CT on the due date specified in the invitation .

FY2025 Master Plan/ FY Strategic Plan Summary

Guidelines of The Chapman Trusts

Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education. (in millions)

FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY AND INFORMAL CARE FOR OLDER ADULTS IN MEXICO

State of the sector report Voluntary Community Charity

Creating Philanthropy Initiatives to Enhance Community Vitality

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016

A Guide To Starting The Summer Food Service Program In Your Community

SUPPORTING ENTREPRENEURS. A Longitudinal Impact Study of Accion and Opportunity Fund Small Business Lending in the U.S.

JOB DESCRIPTION Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Transfer of Wealth Studies

RURAL HOUSING PERSPECTIVES Joe Belden, Housing Assistance Council. Southern Legislative Conference Oklahoma City, Oklahoma July 12, 2008

Municipal Stream. Community Transportation Grant Program. Application Guidelines and Requirements Issued: December 2017

Improving Coordinate Accuracy for Cancer Cases in Oklahoma

Grant writing with Census data. Celeste K. Carruthers

Issues in Monitoring the Socio-Economic Effects of the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Grant Program. EWP Working Paper Number 5 Summer 2002

February 21, Regional Directors Child Nutrition Programs All Regions. State Agency Directors All States

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014

Stronger Economies Together Doing Better Together. Broadband: Session 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE ARTS & CULTURAL INDUSTRIES IN SANTA FE COUNTY

Critical Access Hospitals and HCAHPS

Community Leadership Project Request for Proposals August 31, 2012

POLICY ISSUES AND ALTERNATIVES

COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE APPLICATION Providing local leaders the tools to create prosperous, livable communities

Monitor Staffing Standards in the Child and Adult Care Food Program Interim Rule Guidance

September 14, 2009 Nashville, Tennessee

Colorado Blueprint 1

Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET

RURAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE

Request for 2018 Proposals

2018 Citizens Institute on Rural Design Application

The Government s Role in Stimulating Clusters

A4LE SOUTHERN REGION FOUNDATION 2016 Scholarship Application Package

THE STATION AT POTOMAC YARD. Public, Private, and Non-Profit Collaboration BY HELEN S. MCILVAINE

Date: 5/25/2012. To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia. From: Christos Siderelis

INNOVATION SUPERCLUSTERS. Information Session

Economic Development Concept Plan

Rural E-Commerce Grants Program

2017 RFP External Reviewer Guide

California Community Clinics

CELEBRATING CANADIAN BUSINESS EXCELLENCE

Accreditation Support Initiative (ASI) for Local Health Departments

Grants will not be made to individuals, churches, or to national organizations that do not have local, financially-independent chapters.

2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS

CEFPI SOUTHERN REGION FOUNDATION 2015 Scholarship Application Package

2018 V4B Awards Sponsorship. Design by

STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY: THE ROLE OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Robert Blair, Jerome Deichert, and David J.

Building our future, together. Steering Committee Presentation for the Comprehensive Plan Update November 12, 2013

BLOOMINGTON NONPROFITS: SCOPE AND DIMENSIONS

Economic Development via Placemaking

Request for Proposal Portage County Food Hub Feasibility Study

Our next phase of regulation A more targeted, responsive and collaborative approach

Improving competitiveness through discovery research

IMPACT Index Survey: Funding Trends for Entrepreneurship Centers

ocume Lambeth Community Fund Fund guidelines

MENTOR UP REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Grant Opportunity. Application Deadline: November 13, 2015

Broadband KY e-strategy Report

MBQIP Quality Measure Trends, Data Summary Report #20 November 2016

Minnesota s Physical Therapist Assistant Workforce, 2015

STATE AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY East Central Region BACKGROUND THE REGION

Current Conditions in IA

Local Government and Tourism. Position and recommendations paper

Report on Weingart Foundation s Grantmaking to Nonprofit Organizations Based in the Inland Empire. Executive Summary November, 2013

Rural = SMALL. Rural & Frontier Dwellers And those who care for them 6/13/2014. Deborah Pontius MSN, RN, NCSN

Director - Mississippi & New Orleans Programs Jackson, MS

Adopting Accountable Care An Implementation Guide for Physician Practices

The Center for the Study of Education Policy Illinois State University. Request for Proposal (RFP) Announcement

WHY NORTH DAKOTA COUNTIES MATTER!

Student Project PRACTICE-BASED RESEARCH

Healthcare. Healthcare Transformation Services: revitalizing the vision of compassionate care. Consulting

Cognizant Making the Future After-School and Summer Program Grant Guidelines

2.b.iv Care Transitions Intervention Model to Reduce 30-day Readmissions for Chronic Health Conditions

Transcription:

Background Information About the Stronger Economies Together (SET) Program: In many counties especially counties with smaller populations -- finding ways to create, attract, and retain jobs is a challenging process. Pursuing economic development as a single rural county in isolation from other nearby counties is becoming increasingly ineffective. In today s global market place, economic development progress is more likely to be realized when rural and metro counties work together as a multi-county region to assess, design, and implement plans that build on their assets and comparative economic strengths. That s what the Stronger Economies Together (SET) program is all about. Purpose: The purpose of SET is to strengthen the capacity of communities/counties in rural America to work together in developing and implementing an economic development blueprint for their multi-county region, one that strategically builds on the current and emerging economic strengths of that region. In short, SET is a High Quality regional economic development Plan (HQP) development process. Sponsors: The Stronger Economies Together (SET) Program is sponsored by USDA Rural Development (USDA RD), in partnership with the nation s four Regional Rural Development Centers, and their land-grant university colleagues. One of the land-grant institutions playing a key coordinating role is the Purdue University Center for Rural Development (PCRD). Eligible States/Regions: Regions located in the following states are invited to take part in Phase IV of the SET program. They are Colorado, Illinois, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Texas. PLEASE NOTE that counties that make up your region must be contiguous to one another. 1

What Types of Regions Are the Most Likely to Benefit from SET? Regions have entered the SET program from a variety of starting points. Some regional groups are newly formed, while others have been in place for an extended period of time. While SET is particularly appropriate for newly forming regions, it can also be helpful for more established regions that are interested in exploring new opportunities or revisiting/refining existing plans (e.g., such as the region s CEDS). Successful SET regions have five common characteristics; therefore, a commitment of all regional team members to the following is extremely important: Recognition that regional strategies represent a key part of the overall economic development blueprint for the region s small communities, cities, and counties; Openness to exploring economic activities that focus on strengthening a handful of key existing or emerging economic clusters in the region; Commitment to gathering inputs and insights from a large diverse set of institutions and people when determining the region s goals and plans, going well beyond only economic development professionals and elected officials; Willingness to take a fresh look at where the region is, where it wants to go, and the best way to get there; Commitment to devote significant time and energy needed a) to actively participate and work through all SET planning materials as a regional team; and b) to use this process to develop a High Quality regional economic development Plan (HQP) that is developed and implemented by the regional team. Planning Process: A Key Component of the SET Program: The SET program includes nine (9) core modules that are facilitated with each regional team on a face-to-face basis. State Coaching Teams, made up of representatives of your state s land-grant university-based Extension Service, state USDA Rural Development staff, and other key partners, will facilitate the SET planning process and serve as resource persons to your team. Approximately 35+ hours of active facilitated planning will be provided to each regional team over the course of several months. Selected regions are expected to actively participate in the entire process. More information about the stages of the process is available at: http://srdc.msstate.edu/set/files/set_overview.pdf. The High Quality Plan: A Critical Component of the SET Program: The SET planning process is a means to an end. The end, of course, is a region with a stronger economy. Regions that join SET are required to develop and implement a HQP. (Details on the attributes of a High Quality Plan are available on the SET website listed on the link below.) Development of the HQP positions the region for implementation of the plan. http://srdc.msstate.edu/set/high_quality_ed_plan.html Limited Amount of Technical Assistance Available to Regional Teams: Aside from facilitating the SET process, the State Coaching Team will provide up to 40 hours of technical assistance to your regional team for a period of 12 months once your team has completed its SET planning process. By technical assistance we mean that Extension educators and USDA RD State staff will seek to assist your team in securing the type of information (e.g., data, expertise, advice) needed to guide your regional team as you begin to implement your High Quality Plan (HQP). This includes securing the help of university colleagues or USDA RD state staff members who may have the background/expertise needed by your team 2

Major Benefits to Successful Applicants: Each selected region will receive a number of important benefits including: Valuable coaching on the core building blocks that will serve as the foundation for developing and launching your region s HQP. In-depth data that are tailored to your region, information that helps delineate the critical drivers of your economy (including the presence or emergence of regional clusters). Tools that uncover local assets and resources that can be tapped to advance your region s economic strategies and actions. Coaching and a limited amount of technical assistance (up to 40 hours over a period of one year after completion of the SET planning process) from Extension educators, USDA RD State staff, and the Regional Rural Development Centers to guide your regional team as you begin to implement your HQP. Opportunity to share information and gather ideas/insights from other regions across the nation involved in the SET program. The Rural Requirement: Each region must encompass three or more counties and the population and/or geographic area of the region must be at least 51% rural in nature OR (2) 75% of the region s land area must be located in rural areas of that region. (See definitions and resources in the Additional Information section of this document.) While a region may cross state boundaries (something we encourage if it makes sense for your region), the counties that make up that multi-state region must meet the rural requirement as well. Deadline Date for Applications: Applications are due electronically no later than June 24, 2013 (by 11:59 p.m. Central Daylight Time). Please submit your application to: Ryan McMullen (ryan.mcmullen@ok.usda.gov). You will receive an acknowledgement of your application within two business days. We urge all applicants to contact us immediately if they have not received an acknowledgement within this time period. All applications will be carefully studied by a state review team representing the state s USDA RD office, Cooperative Extension Service, and other key community/economic development organizations or agencies. The state review team may contact applicants in order to conduct site visits or to coordinate conference calls with representatives of your group. Once the state review team has completed its evaluation of all SET applicants, it will submit its recommendations to the national USDA RD office. Key representatives from USDA RD and the Regional Rural Development Centers may initiate conference calls with the pool of finalists. The national USDA RD Office will make the final decision regarding regions in each of the target states that will be invited to be part of the SET program. This announcement is expected to take place by August 30, 2013. Questions? If you have any questions, please contact: Ryan McMullen USDA-RD State Office 405-742-1000 ryan.mcmullen@ok.usda.gov Dave Shideler Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service 405-744-6170 dave.shideler@okstate.edu 3

APPLICATION FORM Stronger Economies Together Program Deadline for Applications: June 19, 2013; 11:59 p.m. local Time Please Complete All Sections of the Application Form Part A: Information about Your Regional Team a. Name of your Regional Team (if none has been decided yet, just provide a name that best describes the geographic area of your regional group). NOTE: For purposes of this application, a region is defined as an area that encompasses three or more counties that are contiguous to one another. It is acceptable for your region to cross state boundaries. b. What counties are included in your region? c. Main contact person for your regional team: Please indicate whether: d. Email address: Business OR Personal e. Telephone number: Business OR Personal f. Mailing address: Business OR Personal g. SET is particularly appropriate for newly forming or inactive regions; thus, we will award maximum points (15 points) to such regions. We know that SET can also be helpful to more established regions that are open to reconsidering all aspects of their existing plans; such regions will be considered, and will be awarded fewer points. Please place an X by the ONE statement that best describes your regional team. Our regional team: Is brand new and has been organized for the purpose of applying for the SET program (15 points) Has been organized for more than one year, but is inactive and/or in need of help to get back on track (15 points) Is less than one year old and is still trying to get off the ground in developing a sound regional economic development plan (10 points) Has been in place for one year or more and has developed OR is pursuing an effective regional economic development plan. The group is open to reconsidering all aspects of the plan (0 points) 4

Part B: Brief Economic Description of Your Region (250 word limit) Present an overview of why the proposed area is an economic region and the sectors that represent key drivers of your economy. Here are the types of information you might include in your description: Economic region: Is this region an economic region? For instance, what evidence do you have that the counties in your region, taken together, constitute an economic region (or an emerging economic region)? Key sectors that make up your economy and the current health of these sectors: In general, tell us about how the economy of your region is doing and why. Are your key sectors stable, expanding, declining, or mixed in terms of their performance? 5

Part C: History of Working Together in the Region (250 word limit) Please describe your regional team s history of working together on economic development issues in the past. What have been your successes, if any? What have been your challenges or barriers, if any? Please note that points are not awarded for the volume of your past history, since SET is ideal for new groups. Rather, points are awarded for the completeness and clarity of the description. 6

Part D: Challenges of Pursuing a Regional Economic Development Plan (250 word limit) In Part C, you discussed the history of working together across your region. In this part, please focus on the future and, specifically, what you anticipate will be some of the key challenges that your team will face as it seeks to develop and launch a regional economic development plan? Please address how you may resolve these issues. For instance, consider potential challenges related to: A. Recruiting a large and diverse set of regional team members B. Developing a regional mindset C. Assuring strong active participation from all regional team members throughout a long process D. Assuring that all regional team members bring to SET a true willingness to take a fresh look at the region and its challenges and opportunities E. Implementing a plan F. Other key challenges your region believes it may encounter 7

Part E: Interest in the SET Initiative (400 word limit) 1. Explain why your regional team would like to be part of the SET program. What are the primary factors influencing your interest in SET right now? 2. What do you hope/expect will happen in your region due to your participation in SET? 8

Part F: Current Members of Your Regional Team and Commitment Letters Please provide the names of the individuals and their respective organization/agency affiliations that have agreed to be part of your regional team. More effective regional teams include representation from many sectors. Applications with broad representation will score higher. ALSO, a signed commitment letter from each person on your team that states that he/she has agreed (1) to actively participate in the 35+ hours of SET planning process and (2) to honor the commitments stated below must be included with this application. Name of Regional Team Member Primary Organization/Agency the Person Represents (Feel free to attach a separate sheet if needed to add more Regional Team members) Have Commitment Letter from this Person? Commitments: Success of SET depends on the commitment of all regional team members to the following: Recognition that regional strategies represent a key part of the overall economic development blueprint for the region s small communities, cities, and counties; Openness to exploring economic activities that will focus on strengthening a handful of key existing or emerging economic clusters in the region; Commitment to gathering inputs and insights from a large diverse set of institutions and people when determining the region s goals and plans; Willingness to take a fresh look at where the region is, where it wants to go, and the best way to get there; Commitment to devoting the significant time and energy needed a) to actively participate and work through the entire SET planning process as a regional team; and b) to use this process as the foundation for a High Quality regional economic development Plan that is developed and implemented by the regional team. 9

Additional Information for Applicants Definition of Rural For purposes of this application, rural refers to counties that are classified as nonmetropolitan areas by the Office of Management and Budget. Nonmetropolitan areas can be either micropolitan or noncore counties. This information can be downloaded from the following SRDC web site: http://srdc.msstate.edu/set/definitionrural.html Budgeting for SET Meeting Expenses SET funds are not available to support meeting room rentals or refreshments. As such, regional teams are encouraged to seek local sponsors to pay the cost of meeting room rentals or for meals, snacks, and/or drinks that the team may wish to make available during the SET planning process sessions. How Proposals Will Be Scored All proposals will be scored on a 200 points basis. The following details the maximum amount of points associated with each component of the SET application. Please note that in addition to the scores associated with each SET application, USDA RD will be looking for other key elements in the selection process, such as regions with: (a) a different mix of recent regional work history; (b) varying levels of ruralness; (c) different economic characteristics; (d) crossing state lines; (e) varying levels of social and demographic features (i.e., high poverty, population migration patterns, and racial/ethnic changes). These additional elements are intended to ensure that a good mix of regions is part of the SET program. Maximum Points Possible Work history of your region (Part A.,g.) 15 Description provided of your economic region (Part B) 20 Description of history of working together (Part C) 15 Discussion of challenges of pursuing a regional plan (Part D) 40 Discussion of the region s interest in the SET initiative (Part E) 50 Diversity of people/organizations that have committed to be on your SET team (Part F) 50 Overall quality and completeness of the proposal 10 TOTAL POINTS 200 10