NAVMC A C May 09. Subj: TRAIN THE TRAINER TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL, (SHORT TITLE: T3 T&R MANUAL)

Similar documents
NAVMC C 469 FEB Subj: MARINE CORPS COMMON SKILLS (VOLUME 2) TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL, (SHORT TITLE: MCCS (VOL.

NAVMC C Aug 07. Subj: GROUND SENSOR SURVEILLANCE TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL, (SHORT TITLE: GROUND SENSOR T&R MANUAL)

NAVMC C Dec 08

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UN ITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

NAVMC C Nov 06. Subj: ASSAULT AMPHIBIAN TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL, (SHORT TITLE: AA T&R MANUAL)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C NAVMC B C Jan 2012

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC B C Oct 2015

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC C C Oct 2017

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC C C Mar 2017

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARlERS UNilED STAlES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC B C Oct 2014

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC B C Mar 2017

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

MCO P C469 7 Oct 04. Subj: RECONNAISSANCE TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQ UARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CO RPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC C C Oct 2014

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC B C Mar 2017

NAVMC B W/CH 1-2

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC MCO C SEP 99

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC B C Feb 2014

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON D.C ` MCO 3502.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC B C Mar 2015

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC MCO C AUG 02

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC C C Mar 2017

Chapter 3. Types of Training. The best form of welfare for the troops is first class training, for this saves unnecessary casualties.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HI::MlOUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

HQMC 20 Aug 04 E R R A T U M. to MCO CAREER PLANNER TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL (SHORT TITLE: T&R MANUAL)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC D C May 2016

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2D MARINE AIRCRAFT WING II MARINE EXPEDITIONARY FORCE POSTAL SERVICE CENTER BOX 8050 CHERRY POINT, NC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

Chapter 4 Training Standards

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS Marine Corps Warfighting Lab Marine Corps Combat Development Command Quantico, Virginia 22134

CHAPTER 10. PATROL PREPARATION

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC MCO C Oct 02

How to Conduct Training

Subj: MARINE CORPS POLICY ON ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING FOR OPERATIONS IN AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) ENVIRONMENT

TRADOC REGULATION 25-31, ARMYWIDE DOCTRINAL AND TRAINING LITERATURE PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 30 MARCH 1990

The Marine Combat Leader as Trainer Decisionmaker Tactician Mentor Teacher Fighter Leader. LtCol B.B. McBreen

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

3114 NAVMC A 19 May 2015

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNJTED STATES MAR 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

150-MC-0006 Validate the Protection Warfighting Function Staff (Battalion through Corps) Status: Approved

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NAVMC B C Jul 2015

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS BASE PSC BOX CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA {)004

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

Subj: SURFACE SHIP AND SUBMARINE SURVIVABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

Concept of I MEF Advisor Training

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

TRAIN-THE-TRAINER PROGRAM

WA OPERATIONS INSTRUCTION 5

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC

Directorate of Environmental Integration, U.S. Army Engineer School COL Robert S. Kirsch

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC MCO 1500R.35A C Jan 1995

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Preparing to Occupy. Brigade Support Area. and Defend the. By Capt. Shayne D. Heap and Lt. Col. Brent Coryell

Subj: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE TO THE COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS

Report Date: 05 Jun 2012

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

FITNESS REPORTS B3K0477XQ-DM STUDENT HANDOUT

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC

Improving the Tank Scout. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain R.L. Burton CG #3, FACADs: Majors A.L. Shaw and W.C. Stophel 7 February 2006

Weber State University. Master of Science in Nursing Program. Master s Project Handbook

OPNAVINST D N Mar 2010

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST PSC BOX CAMP LEJEUNE Ne

HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M. MCO dtd 9 Jun 00 MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

MCO D C Sep 2008

MCO A C Apr Subj: ASSIGNMENT AND UTILIZATION OF CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES (CNA) FIELD REPRESENTATIVES

POLICIES CONCERNING THE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

3119 NAVMC A 19 May 2015

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WEAPONS TRAINING BATTALION TRAINING COMMAND GARAND ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA LESSON PLAN

Summary Report for Individual Task 805D Conduct a Military Memorial Ceremony Status: Approved

Low Altitude Air Defense (LAAD) Gunner's Handbook

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

ADDENDUM. Data required by the National Defense Authorization Act of 1994

TECOM MOS ROADMAP PDF

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM FOR MOS OF CENTRAL OFFICE REPAIRER

Transcription:

C 469 NAVMC 3500.37A From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: TRAIN THE TRAINER TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL, (SHORT TITLE: T3 T&R MANUAL) Ref: (a) MCO P3500.72A (b) MCO 1553.3A (c) MCO 3400.3F (d) MCO 3500.27B (e) MCRP 3-0A (f) MCRP 3-0B (g) MCO 1553.2A 1. Purpose. Training and educating Marines is the responsibility of the Commandant of the Marine Corps under US Code Title 10. Training and educating subordinates to carry out their duties and preparing them to carry out duties of the next grade is a common skill and inherent responsibility of all Marine Corps leaders regardless of occupation, billet or grade. In order to facilitate the accomplishment of these vitally important responsibilities there is an absolute requirement to train and educate the trainers who will train and educate Marines in our formal schools and those Marines who will conduct Unit Training Management (UTM) for all Marine units. Per reference (a), this T&R Manual establishes Core Capability Mission Essential Tasks (METS) to standardize training of Marine Corps formal school instructors, curriculum developers, and unit training managers. Additionally, it provides tasking for Train the Trainer School (T3) (formerly Instructional Management School (IMS)), preparing personnel for service in formal schools, PME schools, and training detachments, as well as unit training managers/leaders assigned to the operating forces and supporting establishment. This NAVMC supersedes MCO 1510.69C, Individual Training Standards for Formal School Faculty, and NAVMC 3500.37 dated 7 Feb 2008. 2. Scope a. The T3 School will use references (a) through (g) to ensure programs of instruction meet skill-training requirements established in this manual. b. The Core METS in this manual are specifically used to provide focus to the development of training standards for formal school instruction, curriculum development, and UTM. Reference (g) details the requirement for formal schools, PME schools, and training detachments to train formal school instructors and curriculum developers. Formal school readiness will be assessed via the Training and Education Command (TECOM) Commanding Generals Inspection Program (CGIP) utilizing the AIRS 400 inspection checklist. The DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

AIRS 400 checklist evaluates formal school/pme school/training detachment compliance with the requirement to train formal school instructors and curriculum developers, via T3 formal courses that utilize individual training events in this manual. c. Efficient and effective UTM is critical to the combat readiness of the Marine Corps. Reference (b) provides guidance to commanders in the conduct of internal assessment of the unit s ability to execute each assigned MET, and develop long-, mid-, and short-range training plans to sustain proficiency in each MET. Personnel assigned to billets involved in the UTM process will be trained in accordance with individual events for UTM contained in this manual. The T3 School will be the proponent for standardized UTM via Mobile Training Team training and will assist commanders in building training plans that make the best use of time and resources while sustaining MET proficiency and combat readiness. 3. Information. CG, TECOM will update this T&R Manual as necessary to provide current and relevant training standards to commanders. All questions pertaining to the Marine Corps Ground T&R Program and UTM should be directed to: Commanding General, TECOM (Ground Training Branch C 469), 1019 Elliot Road, Quantico, VA 22134. 4. Command. This Directive is applicable to the Marine Corps Total Force. 5. Certification. Reviewed and approved this date. Distribution: PCN 10031974000 Copy to: 7000260 (2) 8145001 (1) M. G. SPIESE By direction 2

LOCATOR SHEET Subj: TRAIN THE TRAINER TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL, (SHORT TITLE: T3 T&R MANUAL) Location: (Indicate location(s) of copy(ies) of this Manual.) i

RECORD OF CHANGES Log completed change action as indicated. Change Number Date of Change Date Entered Signature of Person Incorporated Change ii

T3 T&R MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1................... OVERVIEW 2................... MISSION ESSENTIAL TASKS MATRIX 3................... FORMAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTOR INDIVIDUAL EVENTS 4................... FORMAL SCHOOL CURRICULUM DEVELOPER INDIVIDUAL EVENTS 5................... FORMAL SCHOOL MANAGER INDIVIDUAL EVENTS 6................... UNIT READINESS PLANNING INDIVIDUAL EVENTS APPENDICES A................... FUNCTIONAL AREA MATRIX B................... TERMS AND DEFINITIONS iii

T3 T&R MANUAL CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW PARAGRAPH PAGE INTRODUCTION......................... 1000 1-2 UNIT TRAINING........................ 1001 1-2 UNIT TRAINING MANAGEMENT................... 1002 1-3 SUSTAINMENT AND EVALUATION OF TRAINING............ 1003 1-3 T & R MANUAL ORGANIZATION.................. 1004 1-4 T&R EVENT CODING....................... 1005 1-5 COMBAT READINESS PERCENTAGE.................. 1006 1-5 EVALUATION-CODED (E-CODED) EVENTS.............. 1007 1-6 CRP CALCULATION....................... 1008 1-6 T&R EVENT COMPOSITION.................... 1009 1-7 CBRNE TRAINING........................ 1010 1-9 NIGHT TRAINING........................ 1011 1-10 OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT (ORM).............. 1012 1-10 APPLICATION OF SIMULATION.................. 1013 1-11 MARINE CORPS GROUND T&R PROGRAM............... 1014 1-11 1-1

T3 T&R MANUAL CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW 1000. INTRODUCTION 1. The T&R Program is the Corps primary tool for planning, conducting and evaluating training and assessing training readiness. Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) from the operating forces developed core capability Mission Essential Task Lists (METLs) for ground communities derived from the Marine Corps Task List (MCTL). T&R Manuals are built around these METLs and all events contained in T&R Manuals relate directly to this METL. This comprehensive T&R Program will help to ensure the Marine Corps continues to improve its combat readiness by training more efficiently and effectively. Ultimately, this will enhance the Marine Corps ability to accomplish real-world missions. 2. The T&R Manual contains the individual and collective training requirements to prepare units to accomplish their combat mission. The T&R Manual is not intended to be an encyclopedia that contains every minute detail of how to accomplish training. Instead, it identifies the minimum standards that Marines must be able to perform. The T&R Manual is a fundamental tool for commanders to build and maintain unit combat readiness. Using this tool, leaders can construct and execute an effective training plan that supports the unit's METL. More detailed information on the Marine Corps Ground T&R Program is found in reference (a). 1001. UNIT TRAINING 1. The training of Marines to perform as an integrated unit in combat lies at the heart of the T&R program. Unit and individual readiness are directly related. Individual training and the mastery of individual core skills serve as the building blocks for unit combat readiness. A Marine's ability to perform critical skills required in combat is essential. However, it is not necessary to have all individuals within a unit fully trained in order for that organization to accomplish its assigned tasks. Manpower shortfalls, temporary assignments, leave, or other factors outside the commander s control, often affect the ability to conduct individual training. During these periods, unit readiness is enhanced if emphasis is placed on the individual training of Marines on-hand. Subsequently, these Marines will be mission ready and capable of executing as part of a team when the full complement of personnel is available. 2. Commanders will ensure that all tactical training is focused on their combat mission. The T&R Manual is a tool to help develop the unit s training plan. In most cases, unit training should focus on achieving unit proficiency in the core capabilities METL. However, commanders will adjust their training focus to support METLs associated with a major OPLAN/CONPLAN or named operation as designated by their higher commander and reported accordingly in the Defense Readiness Reporting System (DRRS). Tactical 1-2

training will support the METL in use by the commander and be tailored to meet T&R standards. Commanders at all levels are responsible for effective combat training. The conduct of training in a professional manner consistent with Marine Corps standards cannot be over emphasized. 3. Commanders will provide personnel the opportunity to attend formal and operational level courses of instruction as required by this Manual. Attendance at all formal courses must enhance the warfighting capabilities of the unit as determined by the unit commander. 1002. UNIT TRAINING MANAGEMENT 1. Unit Training Management (UTM) is the application of the Systems Approach to Training and Education (SATE) and the Marine Corps Training Principles. This is accomplished in a manner that maximizes training results and focuses the training priorities of the unit in preparation for the conduct of its wartime mission. 2. UTM techniques, described in references (b) and (e), provide commanders with the requisite tools and techniques to analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate the training of their unit. The Marine Corps Training Principles, explained in reference (b), provide sound and proven direction and are flexible enough to accommodate the demands of local conditions. These principles are not inclusive, nor do they guarantee success. They are guides that commanders can use to manage unit-training programs. The Marine Corps training principles are: - Train as you fight - Make commanders responsible for training - Use standards-based training - Use performance-oriented training - Use mission-oriented training - Train the MAGTF to fight as a combined arms team - Train to sustain proficiency - Train to challenge 3. To maintain an efficient and effective training program, leaders at every level must understand and implement UTM. Guidance for UTM and the process for establishing effective programs are contained in references (a) through (g). 1003. SUSTAINMENT AND EVALUATION OF TRAINING 1. The evaluation of training is necessary to properly prepare Marines for combat. Evaluations are either formal or informal, and performed by members of the unit (internal evaluation) or from an external command (external evaluation). 2. Marines are expected to maintain proficiency in the training events for their MOS at the appropriate grade or billet to which assigned. Leaders are responsible for recording the training achievements of their Marines. Whether it involves individual or collective training events, they must ensure proficiency is sustained by requiring retraining of each event at or 1-3

before expiration of the designated sustainment interval. Performance of the training event, however, is not sufficient to ensure combat readiness. Leaders at all levels must evaluate the performance of their Marines and the unit as they complete training events, and only record successful accomplishment of training based upon the evaluation. The goal of evaluation is to ensure that correct methods are employed to achieve the desired standard, or the Marines understand how they need to improve in order to attain the standard. Leaders must determine whether credit for completing a training event is recorded if the standard was not achieved. While successful accomplishment is desired, debriefing of errors can result in successful learning that will allow ethical recording of training event completion. Evaluation is a continuous process that is integral to training management and is conducted by leaders at every level and during all phases of planning and the conduct of training. To ensure training is efficient and effective, evaluation is an integral part of the training plan. Ultimately, leaders remain responsible for determining if the training was effective. 3. The purpose of formal and informal evaluation is to provide commanders with a process to determine a unit s/marine s proficiency in the tasks that must be performed in combat. Informal evaluations are conducted during every training evolution. Formal evaluations are often scenario-based, focused on the unit s METs, based on collective training standards, and usually conducted during higher-level collective events. References (a) and (f) provide further guidance on the conduct of informal and formal evaluations using the Marine Corps Ground T&R Program. 1004. T & R MANUAL ORGANIZATION 1. T&R Manuals are organized in one of two methods: unit-based or community-based. Unit-based T&R Manuals are written to support a type of unit (Infantry, Artillery, Tanks, etc.) and contain both collective and individual training standards. Community-based are written to support an Occupational Field, a group of related Military Occupational Specialties (MOSs), or billets within an organization (EOD, NBC, Intel, etc.), and usually only contain individual training standards. T&R Manuals are comprised of chapters that contain unit METs, collective training events (CTE), and individual training events (ITEs) for each MOS, billet, etc. 2. The T3 T&R Manual is a community-based manual comprised of 4 chapters. Because it is a community-based manual, not all the information contained in the Chapter 1 Overview is relevant to the application of the training standards in this manual. Chapter 1 amplifies general information contained in reference (a). Chapter 2 lists the Core Capability METs and their related Formal School Instructor, Curriculum Administrator, Formal School Manager, and Unit Training Management events. Chapters 3 and 4 contain individual events. The Train the Trainer School (formerly Instructional Management School (IMS)) will have proponency on Train the Trainer individual training standards. 1005. T&R EVENT CODING 1. T&R events are coded for ease of reference. Each event has up-to a 4-4- 4-digit identifier. The first up-to four digits are referred to as a 1-4

community and represent the unit type or occupation (TANK, TOW, 1802, etc.). The second up-to four digits represent the functional or duty area (TAC, CMDC, GNRY, etc.). The last four digits represent the level and sequence of the event. 2. The T&R levels are illustrated in Figure 1. An example of the T&R coding is shown in Figure 2. Individual Formal School Training Entry-Level (Core Skills) Individual Training & Career Progression MOJT, Career-level or Advanced-level School (Core Plus Skills) Collective Training TEAM Collective Training SECTION 1000-Level 2000-Level 3000-Level 4000-Level Collective Training Collective Training Collective Training Collective Training PLATOON COMPANY BATTALION REG/BDE/MEU 5000-Level 6000-Level 7000-Level 8000-Level Figure 1: T&R Event Levels Unit Readiness Planning URP-ANLZ-2001 Analyze Core/1st event Figure 2: T&R Event Coding 1006. COMBAT READINESS PERCENTAGE 1. The Marine Corps Ground T&R Program includes processes to assess readiness of units and individual Marines. Every unit in the Marine Corps maintains a basic level of readiness based on the training and experience of the Marines in the unit. Even units that never trained together are capable of accomplishing some portion of their missions. Combat readiness assessment does not associate a quantitative value for this baseline of readiness, but uses a Combat Readiness Percentage, as a method to provide a concise descriptor of the recent training accomplishments of units and Marines. 2. Combat Readiness Percentage (CRP) is the percentage of required training events that a unit or Marine accomplishes within specified sustainment intervals. 3. In unit-based T&R Manuals, unit combat readiness is assessed as a percentage of the successfully completed and current (within sustainment 1-5

interval) key training events called Evaluation-Coded (E-Coded) Events. E- Coded Events and unit CRP calculation are described in follow-on paragraphs. CRP achieved through the completion of E-Coded Events is directly relevant to readiness assessment in DRRS. 4. Individual combat readiness, in both unit-based and community-based T&R Manuals, is assessed as the percentage of required individual events in which a Marine is current. This translates as the percentage of training events for his/her MOS and grade (or billet) that the Marine successfully completes within the directed sustainment interval. Individual skills are developed through a combination of 1000-level training (entry-level formal school courses), individual on-the-job training in 2000-level events, and follow-on formal school training. Skill proficiency is maintained by retraining in each event per the specified sustainment interval. 1007. EVALUATION-CODED (E-CODED) EVENTS 1. Unit-type T&R Manuals can contain numerous unit events, some for the whole unit and others for integral parts that serve as building blocks for training. To simplify training management and readiness assessment, only collective events that are critical components of a mission essential task (MET), or key indicators of a unit s readiness, are used to generate CRP for a MET. These critical or key events are designated in the T&R Manual as Evaluation-Coded (E-Coded) events. Formal evaluation of unit performance in these events is recommended because of their value in assessing combat readiness. Only E-Coded events are used to calculate CRP for each MET. 2. The use of a METL-based training program allows the commander discretion in training. This makes the T&R Manual a training tool rather than a prescriptive checklist. 1008. CRP CALCULATION 1. Collective training begins at the 3000 level (team, crew or equivalent). Unit training plans are designed to accomplish the events that support the unit METL while simultaneously sustaining proficiency in individual core skills. Using the battalion-based (unit) model, the battalion (7000-level) has collective events that directly support a MET on the METL. These collective events are E-Coded and the only events that contribute to unit CRP. This is done to assist commanders in prioritizing the training toward the METL, taking into account resource, time, and personnel constraints. 2. Unit CRP increases after the completion of E-Coded events. The number of E-Coded events for the MET determines the value of each E-Coded event. For example, if there are 4 E-Coded events for a MET, each is worth 25% of MET CRP. MET CRP is calculated by adding the percentage of each completed and current (within sustainment interval) E-Coded training event. The percentage for each MET is calculated the same way and all are added together and divided by the number of METS to determine unit CRP. For ease of calculation, we will say that each MET has 4 E-Coded events, each contributing 25% towards the completion of the MET. If the unit has completed and is current on three of the four E-Coded events for a given MET, then they have completed 75% of the MET. The CRP for each MET is added 1-6

together and divided by the number of METS to get unit CRP; unit CRP is the average of MET CRP. For Example: MET 1: 75% complete (3 of 4 E-Coded events trained) MET 2: 100% complete (6 of 6 E-Coded events trained) MET 3: 25% complete (1 of 4 E-Coded events trained) MET 4: 50% complete (2 of 4 E-Coded events trained) MET 5: 75% complete (3 of 4 E-Coded events trained) To get unit CRP, simply add the CRP for each MET and divide by the number of METS: MET CRP: 75 + 100 + 25 + 50 + 75 = 325 Unit CRP: 325 (total MET CRP)/ 5 (total number of METS) = 65% 1009. T&R EVENT COMPOSITION 1. This section explains each of the components of a T&R event. These items are included in all events in each T&R manual. a. Event Code (see Sect 1005). The event code is a 4-4-4 character set. For individual training events, the first 4 characters indicate the occupational function. The second 4 characters indicate functional area (TAC, CBTS, VOPS, etc.). The third 4 characters are simply a numerical designator for the event. b. Event Title. The event title is the name of the event. c. E-Coded. This is a yes/no category to indicate whether or not the event is E-Coded. If yes, the event contributes toward the CRP of the associated MET. The value of each E-Coded event is based on number of E- Coded events for that MET. Refer to paragraph 1008 for detailed explanation of E-Coded events. d. Supported MET(s). List all METs that are supported by the training event. e. Sustainment Interval. This is the period, expressed in number of months, between evaluation or retraining requirements. Skills and capabilities acquired through the accomplishment of training events are refreshed at pre-determined intervals. It is essential that these intervals are adhered to in order to ensure Marines maintain proficiency. f. Billet. Individual training events may contain a list of billets within the community that are responsible for performing that event. This ensures that the billets expected tasks are clearly articulated and a Marine s readiness to perform in that billet is measured. g. Grade. Each individual training event will list the rank(s) at which Marines are required to learn and sustain the training event. 1-7

h. Initial Training Setting. For Individual T&R Events only, this specifies the location for initial instruction of the training event in one of three categories (formal school, managed on-the-job training, distance learning). Regardless of the specified Initial Training Setting, any T&R event may be introduced and evaluated during managed on-the-job training. (1) FORMAL When the Initial Training Setting of an event is identified as FORMAL (formal school), the appropriate formal school or training detachment is required to provide initial training in the event. Conversely, formal schools and training detachments are not authorized to provide training in events designated as Initial Training Setting MOJT or DL. Since the duration of formal school training must be constrained to optimize Operating Forces manning, this element provides the mechanism for Operating Forces prioritization of training requirements for both entrylevel (1000-level) and career-level (2000-level) T&R Events. For formal schools and training detachments, this element defines the requirements for content of courses. (2) DL Identifies the training event as a candidate for initial training via a Distance Learning product (correspondence course or MarineNet course). (3) MOJT Events specified for Managed On-the-Job Training are to be introduced to Marines, and evaluated, as part of training within a unit by supervisory personnel. i. Event Description. Provide a description of the event purpose, objectives, goals, and requirements. It is a general description of an action requiring learned skills and knowledge (e.g. Camouflage the M1A1 Tank). j. Condition. Describe the condition(s), under which tasks are performed. Conditions are based on a real world operational environment. They indicate what is provided (equipment, materials, manuals, aids, etc.), environmental constraints, conditions under which the task is performed, and any specific cues or indicators to which the performer must respond. When resources or safety requirements limit the conditions, this is stated. k. Standard. The standard indicates the basis for judging effectiveness of the performance. It consists of a carefully worded statement that identifies the proficiency level expected when the task is performed. The standard provides the minimum acceptable performance parameters and is strictly adhered to. The standard for collective events is general, describing the desired end-state or purpose of the event. While the standard for individual events specifically describe to what proficiency level in terms of accuracy, speed, sequencing, quality of performance, adherence to procedural guidelines, etc., the event is accomplished. l. Event Components. Describe the actions composing the event and help the user determine what must be accomplished and to properly plan for the event. m. Prerequisite Events. Prerequisites are academic training or other T&R events that must be completed prior to attempting the task. They are lower-level events or tasks that give the individual/unit the skills required 1-8

to accomplish the event. They can also be planning steps, administrative requirements, or specific parameters that build toward mission accomplishment. n. Chained Events. Collective T&R events are supported by lower-level collective and individual T&R events. This enables unit leaders to effectively identify subordinate T&R events that ultimately support specific mission essential tasks. When the accomplishment of any upper-level events, by their nature, result in the performance of certain subordinate and related events, the events are chained. The completion of chained events will update sustainment interval credit (and CRP for E-Coded events) for the related subordinate level events. o. Related Events. Provide a list of all Individual Training Standards that support the event. p. References. The training references are utilized to determine task performance steps, grading criteria, and ensure standardization of training procedures. They assist the trainee in satisfying the performance standards, or the trainer in evaluating the effectiveness of task completion. References are also important to the development of detailed training plans. q. Distance Learning Products (IMI, CBT, MCI, etc.). Include this component when the event can be taught via one of these media methods vice attending a formal course of instruction or receiving MOJT. r. Support Requirements. This is a list of the external and internal support the unit and Marines will need to complete the event. The list includes, but is not limited to: Range(s)/Training Area Ordnance Equipment Materials Other Units/Personnel Other Support Requirements s. Miscellaneous. Provide any additional information that assists in the planning and execution of the event. Miscellaneous information may include, but is not limited to: Admin Instructions Special Personnel Certifications Equipment Operating Hours Road Miles 2. Community-based T&R manuals may have several additional components not found in unit-based T&R manuals. 1010. CBRNE TRAINING 1. All personnel assigned to the operating force must be trained in chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive incident defense (CBRNE), in order to survive and continue their mission in this environment. 1-9

Individual proficiency standards are defined as survival and basic operating standards. Survival standards are those that the individual must master in order to survive CBRNE attacks. Basic operating standards are those that the individual, and collectively the unit, must perform to continue operations in a CBRNE environment. 2. In order to develop and maintain the ability to operate in an CBRNE environment, CBRNE training is an integral part of the training plan and events in this T&R Manual. Units should train under CBRNE conditions whenever possible. Per reference (c), all units must be capable of accomplishing their assigned mission in a contaminated environment. 1011. NIGHT TRAINING 1. While it is understood that all personnel and units of the operating force are capable of performing their assigned mission in every climate and place, current doctrine emphasizes the requirement to perform assigned missions at night and during periods of limited visibility. Basic skills are significantly more difficult when visibility is limited. 2. To ensure units are capable of accomplishing their mission they must train under the conditions of limited visibility. Units should strive to conduct all events in this T&R Manual during both day and night/limited visibility conditions. When there is limited training time available, night training should take precedence over daylight training, contingent on individual, crew, and unit proficiency. 1012. OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT (ORM) 1. ORM is a process that enables commanders to plan for and minimize risk while still accomplishing the mission. It is a decision making tool used by Marines at all levels to increase operational effectiveness by anticipating hazards and reducing the potential for loss, thereby increasing the probability of a successful mission. ORM minimizes risks to acceptable levels, commensurate with mission accomplishment. 2. Commanders, leaders, maintainers, planners, and schedulers will integrate risk assessment in the decision-making process and implement hazard controls to reduce risk to acceptable levels. Applying the ORM process will reduce mishaps, lower costs, and provide for more efficient use of resources. ORM assists the commander in conserving lives and resources and avoiding unnecessary risk, making an informed decision to implement a course of action (COA), identifying feasible and effective control measures where specific measures do not exist, and providing reasonable alternatives for mission accomplishment. Most importantly, ORM assists the commander in determining the balance between training realism and unnecessary risks in training, the impact of training operations on the environment, and the adjustment of training plans to fit the level of proficiency and experience of Sailors/Marines and leaders. Further guidance for ORM is found in references (b) and (d). 1-10

1013. APPLICATION OF SIMULATION 1. Simulations/Simulators and other training devices shall be used when they are capable of effectively and economically supplementing training on the identified training task. Particular emphasis shall be placed on simulators that provide training that might be limited by safety considerations or constraints on training space, time, or other resources. When deciding on simulation issues, the primary consideration shall be improving the quality of training and consequently the state of readiness. Potential savings in operating and support costs normally shall be an important secondary consideration. 2. Each training event contains information relating to the applicability of simulation. If simulator training applies to the event, then the applicable simulator(s) is/are listed in the Simulation section and the CRP for simulation training is given. This simulation training can either be used in place of live training, at the reduced CRP indicated; or can be used as a precursor training for the live event, i.e., weapons simulators, convoy trainers, observed fire trainers, etc. It is recommended that tasks be performed by simulation prior to being performed in a live-fire environment. However, in the case where simulation is used as a precursor for the live event, then the unit will receive credit for the live event CRP only. If a tactical situation develops that precludes performing the live event, the unit would then receive credit for the simulation CRP. 1014. MARINE CORPS GROUND T&R PROGRAM 1. The Marine Corps Ground T&R Program continues to evolve. The vision for Ground T&R Program is to publish a T&R Manual for every readiness-reporting unit so that core capability METs are clearly defined with supporting collective training standards, and to publish community-based T&R Manuals for all occupational fields whose personnel augment other units to increase their combat and/or logistic capabilities. The vision for this program includes plans to provide a Marine Corps training management information system that enables tracking of unit and individual training accomplishments by unit commanders and small unit leaders, automatically computing CRP for both units and individual Marines based upon MOS and rank (or billet). Linkage of T&R Events to the Marine Corps Task List (MCTL), through the core capability METs, has enabled objective assessment of training readiness in the DRRS. 2. DRRS measures and reports on the readiness of military forces and the supporting infrastructure to meet missions and goals assigned by the Secretary of Defense. With unit CRP based on the unit s training toward its METs, the CRP will provide a more accurate picture of a unit s readiness. This will give fidelity to future funding requests and factor into the allocation of resources. Additionally, the Ground T&R Program will help to ensure training remains focused on mission accomplishment and that training readiness reporting is tied to units METLs. 1-11

T3 T&R MANUAL CHAPTER 2 MISSION ESSENTIAL TASKS MATRIX PARAGRAPH PAGE T3 MISSION ESSENTIAL TASKS MATRIX.............. 2000 2-2 2-1

T3 T&R MANUAL CHAPTER 2 MISSION ESSENTIAL TASKS MATRIX 2000. T3 MISSION ESSENTIAL TASKS MATRIX. The T3 Mission Essential Task List (METL) Table includes the designated MET number. There are no E-coded events in the T3 T&R Manual. This matrix reflects all events and the MET they support. MET#/MISSION ESSENTIAL TASK MET 1. Implement Formal School Instruction FSIC-IMPI-2101 FSIC-IMPI-2102 FSIC-IMPI-2103 FSIC-IMPI-2104 AIC-IMPL-2201 AIC-IMPL-2202 AIC-IMPL-2203 AIC-IMPL-2204 AIC-IMPL-2205 Prepare for instruction Employ Instructional Communication Conduct a Lesson Conduct After Lesson Management Recommend Changes to Instructional Materials Employ Advanced Instructional Methods Develop Instructors Motivate Students Employ Advanced Facilitation Techniques MET 2. Develop Formal School Curricula CDC-DESI-2013 CDC-DESI-2014 CDC-DESI-2015 CDC-DESI-2016 CDC-DESI-2017 CDC-DESI-2018 CDC-DESI-2019 CDC-DEVI-2012 CDC-DEVI-2020 CDC-DEVI-2021 CDC-DEVI-2022 CDC-DEVI-2023 CDC-DEVI-2024 CDC-DEVI-2025 CDC-DEVI-2026 CDC-DEVI-2027 CDC-DEVI-2028 CDC-DEVI-2029 CDC-TIMS-2011 Write a Target Population Description Conduct a Learning Analysis Develop Learning Objectives Select Instructional Methods Select Instructional Media Write Test Items Sequence Terminal Learning Objectives Assemble a Master Lesson File Develop a Course Structure Develop Concept Cards Develop a Program of Instruction Construct a Test Conduct Validation Conduct an In-Depth Operational Risk Assessment Write an Instructor Preparation Guide Write a Lesson Plan Write Student Materials Develop Instructional Media Use Automated System in Curriculum Development 2-2

MET 3. Conduct Formal School Management FSM-ANLZ-2001 FSM-DESI-2006 FSM-EVLI-2007 FSM-EVLI-2008 FSM-MANI-2002 FSM-MANI-2003 FSM-MANI-2004 FSM-MANI-2005 FSM-TIMS-2009 Develop a T&R Event Integrate Adult Learning Theory into Curriculum Development Implement a Formal School Evaluation Plan Assist in a Course Content Review Board Implement a Formal School Academic Standard Operating Procedure Implement a Staff and Faculty Development Plan Develop a Memorandum of Agreement/Understanding Conduct Operational Risk Assessment Administrate the Use of MCTIMS MET 4. Instruct Unit Readiness Planning (URP) URP-ANLZ-2001 URP-DESI-2006 URP-DESI-2007 URP-DESI-2008 URP-DESI-2009 URP-DESI-2010 URP-DESI-2011 URP-DESI-2012 URP-DEVI-2016 URP-DEVI-2017 URP-DEVI-2019 URP-EVLI-2015 URP-EVLI-2028 URP-IMPI-2024 Develop a METL Conduct Training Assessment Determine Training Strategy Develop Training Guidance Develop a Long Range Training Plan Develop a Mid Range Training Plan Develop a Short Range Training Plan Develop Training Schedules Conduct Unit Training Prepare for Training Conduct Operational Risk Assessment Conduct After-Action Review Evaluate Training Conduct Training 2-3

T3 T&R MANUAL CHAPTER 3 FORMAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTION INDIVIDUAL EVENTS PARAGRAPH PAGE PURPOSE........................... 3000 3-2 ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES..................... 3001 3-2 INDEX OF INDIVIDUAL EVENTS.................. 3002 3-3 2000-LEVEL EVENTS...................... 3003 3-4 3-1

T3 T&R MANUAL CHAPTER 3 FORMAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTION INDIVIDUAL EVENTS 3000. PURPOSE. This chapter details the individual events that pertain to formal school instruction. These events are linked to a Mission Essential Task (MET) developed to guide T3 community training. This linkage tailor s individual training for the selected MET. Each individual event provides an event title, along with the conditions events will be performed under, and the standard to which the event must be performed to be successful. 3001. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES. T&R events are coded for ease of reference. Each event has a 4-4-4 digit identifier. The first four digits represent the occupational field or military occupational field (FSIC, AIC, OR URP). The second four digits represent the functional or duty area (ANLZ, DESI, etc.). The last four digits represent the level, and identifier number of the event. Every individual event has an identifier number from 001 to 999. 3-2

3002. INDEX OF INDIVIDUAL EVENTS EVENT TITLE PAGE 2000 LEVEL EVENTS FSIC-IMPI-2101 Prepare for Instruction 3-4 FSIC-IMPI-2102 Employ Instructional Communication 3-4 FSIC-IMPI-2103 Conduct a Lesson 3-5 FSIC-IMPI-2104 Conduct After Lesson Management 3-5 AIC-IMPL-2201 Recommend Changes to Instructional Materials 3-6 AIC-IMPL-2202 Employ Advanced Instructional Methods 3-6 AIC-IMPL-2203 Develop Instructors 3-7 AIC-IMPL-2204 Motivate Students 3-7 AIC-IMPL-2205 Employ Advanced Facilitation Techniques 3-8 3-3

3003. 2000-LEVEL EVENTS FSIC-IMPI-2101: Prepare for Instruction SUSTAINMENT INTERVAL: 3 months GRADES: CPL, SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO- 5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL CONDITION: Given a Master Lesson File, an instructional setting, and references. STANDARD: In accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) Manual chapter 4 sections 4100 and 4300. 1. Review course/training schedule 2. Review lesson materials 3. Assess time critical risk factors 4. Prepare instructional environment 5. Conduct rehearsals 1. SAT MANUAL Systems Approach to Training Manual FSIC-IMPI-2102: Employ Instructional Communication EVALUATION-CODED: YES SUSTAINMENT INTERVAL: 3 months GRADES: CPL, SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO- 5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL CONDITION: Given a Master Lesson File, an instructional setting, and references. STANDARD: In accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) Manual chapter 4 section 4400. 1. Employ verbal communication techniques 2. Employ non-verbal communication techniques 3. Employ listening techniques 4. Employ questioning techniques 5. Employ facilitation techniques 1. SAT MANUAL Systems Approach to Training Manual 3-4

FSIC-IMPI-2103: Conduct a Lesson SUSTAINMENT INTERVAL: 3 months GRADES: CPL, SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO- 5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL CONDITION: Given a Master Lesson File, an instructional setting, and references. STANDARD: In accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) Manual chapter 4 section 4400. 1. Introduce a lesson 2. Present the main body of the lesson 3. Present instructional methods 4. Employ media 5. Summarize the lesson 1. SAT MANUAL Systems Approach to Training Manual FSIC-IMPI-2104: Conduct After Lesson Management SUSTAINMENT INTERVAL: 3 months GRADES: CPL, SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO- 5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL CONDITION: After the completion of a lesson given evaluation forms, and references. STANDARD: In accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) Manual chapter 4 section 4600. 1. Remove media 2. Secure classified materials 3. Reset the instructional environment 4. Conduct clean up 5. Turn-in any borrowed equipment and resources 6. Review school SOP for additional after lesson actions 7. Collect data 8. Analyze data 9. Record time critical operational risk assessment effectiveness 10. Complete after instruction reports 3-5

1. SAT MANUAL Systems Approach to Training Manual AIC-IMPL-2201: Recommend Changes to Instructional Materials SUSTAINMENT INTERVAL: 12 months GRADES: SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO-5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL, COL CONDITION: Given instructional materials and references. STANDARD: To ensure instructional materials are complete and current in accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) Manual chapter 3 section 3800. 1. Recommend changes to the learning analysis work sheet 2. Recommend changes to the learning objective work sheet 3. Recommend changes to the concept card 4. Recommend changes to the operational risk assessment sheet 5. Recommend changes to the instructor preparation guide 6. Recommend changes to the lesson plan 7. Recommend changes to the student outline 8. Recommend changes to the student supplemental material 9. Recommend changes to media 10. Recommend changes to the training schedule 1. SAT MANUAL Systems Approach to Training Manual AIC-IMPL-2202: Employ Advanced Instructional Methods SUSTAINMENT INTERVAL: 3 months GRADES: SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO-5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL, COL CONDITION: Given instructional materials and references. STANDARD: To ensure the transfer of knowledge and skills. 1. Employ Guided Discussions 2. Employ Peer Teaching Exercises 3. Employ a Case Study 4. Employ Gaming Techniques 5. Employ Mentoring Techniques 6. Employ Role Playing Techniques 3-6

7. Employ Tactical Decision Games 8. Employ Apprenticeship techniques 9. Employ Sand Table Exercises 1. Air Force Manual 36-2236 (Nov 2003) GUIDEBOOK FOR AIR FORCE INSTRUCTORS MISCELLANEOUS: ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS: Instructional Materials may include: Facilitation guides for advanced methods and any/all components of the MLF AIC-IMPL-2203: Develop Instructors SUSTAINMENT INTERVAL: 12 months GRADES: SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO-5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL, COL CONDITION: Given a staff and faculty development plan, instructors, and references. STANDARD: To ensure instructors are certified in all classes they are required to teach; and in accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) Manual chapter 7, section 7202. 1. Implement the Staff & Faculty Development Plan 2. Provide Instructor Orientation 3. Mentor Instructors 4. Train Instructors 5. Evaluate Instructors 6. Record Individual Instructor Training 1. Air Force Manual 36-2236 (Nov 2003) GUIDEBOOK FOR AIR FORCE INSTRUCTORS 2. SAT MANUAL Systems Approach to Training Manual AIC-IMPL-2204: Motivate Students SUSTAINMENT INTERVAL: 3 months GRADES: SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO-5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL, COL CONDITION: Given a lesson to instruct, an instructional setting, and references. STANDARD: To generate and enhance interest in the subject matter. 3-7

1. Apply Motivation theory 2. Apply the Hierarchy of Motivation 3. Apply Motivation Principles 1. Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn A Comprehensive Guide for Teaching All Adults Raymond J. Wlodkowski AIC-IMPL-2205: Employ Advanced Facilitation Techniques SUSTAINMENT INTERVAL: 3 months GRADES: SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO-5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL, COL CONDITION: Given a lesson to facilitate, instructional materials, instructional setting, and references. STANDARD: To enhance student learning to achieve the learning objectives. 1. Relate as a Story Teller 2. Employ Opening Techniques 3. Increase Responsibility for Learning 4. Employ Training Tools 5. Refocus Students 6. Draw Partial Mind Mapping 7. Manage Difficult Students 8. Employ Closing Techniques 9. Connect to previous learning 10. Guide participation 11. Encourage peer interaction 1. Influencer The Power to Change Anything: Grenny, Maxfield, McMillan, Patterson, Switzler 3-8

T3 T&R MANUAL CHAPTER 4 FORMAL SCHOOL CURRICULUM DEVELOPER INDIVIDUAL EVENTS PARAGRAPH PAGE PURPOSE........................... 4000 4-2 ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES..................... 4001 4-2 INDEX OF INDIVIDUAL EVENTS.................. 4002 4-3 2000-LEVEL EVENTS...................... 4003 4-4 4-1

T3 T&R MANUAL CHAPTER 4 FORMAL SCHOOL CURRICULUM DEVELOPER INDIVIDUAL EVENTS 4000. PURPOSE. This chapter details the individual events that pertain to the T3 community. These events are linked to designated formal school Mission Essential Tasks (MET). This linkage tailor s individual training for the selected MET. Each individual event provides an event title, along with the conditions events will be performed under, and the standard to which the event must be performed to be successful. 4001. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES. T&R events are coded for ease of reference. Each event has a 4-4-4 digit identifier. The first four digits represent the occupational field or military occupational field (URP, or FSIC). The second four digits represent the functional or duty area (ANLZ, DESI, etc.). The last four digits represent the level, and identifier number of the event. Every individual event has an identifier number from 001 to 999. 4-2

4002. INDEX OF INDIVIDUAL EVENTS EVENT TITLE PAGE 2000 LEVEL EVENTS CDC-DESI-2013 Write a Target Population Description 4-4 CDC-DESI-2014 Conduct a Learning Analysis 4-4 CDC-DESI-2015 Develop Learning Objectives 4-5 CDC-DESI-2016 Select Instructional Methods 4-5 CDC-DESI-2017 Select Instructional Media 4-6 CDC-DESI-2018 Write Test Items 4-6 CDC-DESI-2019 Sequence Terminal Learning Objectives 4-7 CDC-DEVI-2012 Assemble a Master Lesson File 4-7 CDC-DEVI-2020 Develop a Course Structure 4-8 CDC-DEVI-2021 Develop Concept Cards 4-8 CDC-DEVI-2022 Develop a Program of Instruction 4-9 CDC-DEVI-2023 Construct a Test 4-10 CDC-DEVI-2024 Conduct Validation 4-10 CDC-DEVI-2025 Conduct an In-Depth Operational Risk Assessment 4-11 CDC-DEVI-2026 Write an Instructor Preparation Guide 4-11 CDC-DEVI-2027 Write a Lesson Plan 4-12 CDC-DEVI-2028 Write Student Materials 4-12 CDC-DEVI-2029 Develop Instructional Media 4-13 CDC-TIMS-2011 Use the Automated System in Curriculum Development 4-13 4-3

4003. 2000-LEVEL EVENTS CDC-DESI-2013: Write a Target Population Description GRADES: SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO-5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL, COL CONDITION: Given the required instructional materials and equipment and with the aid of references. STANDARD: That describes the administrative, physical, and academic characteristics of the average student attending the course in accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) Manual chapter 2, section 2100. 1. Obtain sources of data. 2. Review sources of data. 3. Organize data into categories. 4. Record the Target Population Description (TPD). 1. MCTIMS USER MANUAL 2. SAT MANUAL Systems Approach to Training Manual CDC-DESI-2014: Conduct a Learning Analysis GRADES: SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO-5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL, COL CONDITION: Given the necessary materials and equipment and with the aid of references. STANDARD: That defines what will be taught by generating sequenced groups of Knowledge Skills and Attitudes in accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) Manual chapter 2 section 2200. 1. Gather materials. 2. Determine training requirements. 3. Analyze the Target Population Description (TPD). 4. Record task/event data on the Learning Analysis Worksheet (LAW). 5. Generate Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes (KSAs) for each performance step. 6. Group Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes (KSAs) into common areas. 4-4

7. Sequence groupings. 8. Record Learning Analysis in MCTIMS. 1. MCTIMS USER MANUAL 2. SAT MANUAL Systems Approach to Training Manual CDC-DESI-2015: Develop Learning Objectives GRADES: SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO-5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL, COL CONDITION: Given completed Learning Analysis Worksheets, materials and equipment, and with the aid of references. STANDARD: That describe the behavior, condition, and standard consistent with the domain and level of learning in accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) Manual chapter 2 section 2202 and the SAT manual chapter 6. 1. Record behavior from T&R Manual for the Terminal Learning Objective (TLO). 2. Record condition from T&R Manual for the Terminal Learning Objective (TLO). 3. Record standard from T&R Manual for the Terminal Learning Objective (TLO). 4. Compare formal school resources to task behavior. 5. Determine evaluation methods. 6. Complete the Terminal Learning Objective (TLO) on Learning Objective Worksheet (LOW). 7. Document the behavior from grouped KSAs for Enabling Learning Objective (ELO). 8. Determine the condition for Enabling Learning Objective (ELO). 9. Determine the standard for Enabling Learning Objective (ELO). 10. Complete Enabling Learning Objective (ELO) on Learning Objective Worksheet (LOW). 1. MCTIMS USER MANUAL 2. SAT MANUAL Systems Approach to Training Manual CDC-DESI-2016: Select Instructional Methods GRADES: SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, 1STSGT, MSGT, SGTMAJ, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO-5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL, COL 4-5

CONDITION: Given Learning Objectives, Target Population Description, necessary materials and equipment, and with the aid of references. STANDARD: Consistent with the domain and level of learning within the learning objective behaviors in accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) Manual chapter 2 section 2208 and the SAT Manual chapter 6. 1. Review method considerations. 2. Record instructional method(s) on the Learning Objective Worksheet (LOW). 1. MCTIMS USER MANUAL 2. SAT MANUAL Systems Approach to Training Manual CDC-DESI-2017: Select Instructional Media GRADES: SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO-5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL, COL CONDITION: Given Learning Objectives, Target Population Description, necessary materials and equipment, and with the aid of references STANDARD: Consistent with the selected methods and adult learning preferences in accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) Manual chapter 2 section 2209 and SAT manual chapter 6 1. Review media considerations. 2. Record instructional media on the Learning Objective Worksheet (LOW). 1. MCTIMS USER MANUAL 2. SAT MANUAL Systems Approach to Training Manual CDC-DESI-2018: Write Test Items GRADES: SGT, SSGT, GYSGT, MSGT, MGYSGT, WO-1, CWO-2, CWO-3, CWO-4, CWO-5, 2NDLT, 1STLT, CAPT, MAJ, LTCOL, COL CONDITION: Given Learning Analysis Worksheets (LAWs), Learning Objective Worksheets (LOWs), necessary materials and equipment, and with the aid of references. 4-6