Memorandum June 1, 2017

Similar documents
PUBLIC MEETING. For I-10 East, I-410 to Loop 1604

RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP)

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

Federal, State, Local Funding and Assistance Programs. Nicole Fox, Iowa DOT Office of Local Systems

MEMORANDUM July 17, 2017

Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Memorandum March 28, 2018

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Southeast Area Transportation Alliance (SEATA)

Transportation Planning & Investment in Urban North Carolina

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

LIFELINE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM CALL FOR PROJECTS

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

Understanding the. Program

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance

Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works David Martin, Director of Planning and Community Development

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

LPA Programs How They Work

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

North Second Street Multimodal Project Design OCTOBER 2017

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2013

Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS. February 1, Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Prioritization & Selection Process. For the Tulsa Urbanized Area. Revised December 22, 2017

Welcome to the Public Meeting for the State Highway 68 Project. SH 68 Project Office Information Environmental Constraints & Study Corridors

NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Program Management Plan

Jackson MPO Transportation Alternatives (TA)

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1

2018 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Overview Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency

Guidance. Historical Studies Review Procedures

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018

MPO Staff Report MPO Technical Advisory Committee: February 14, 2018 MPO Executive Board: February 21, 2018

MINUTES WINSTON-SALEM URBAN AREA TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) JUNE 18, :00 P.M. SECOND FLOOR, CONFERENCE ROOM, BRYCE A

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY AMARILLO DISTRICT. AUGUST FY 2009 Quarterly Revisions

Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2017) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2017) Application Seminars

Community Outreach Report

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Prioritization & Selection Process. For the Tulsa Urbanized Area. Revised July 31, 2013

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

Memo. Office of State Aid Metro District 1500 West County Rd B2 Roseville, MN Date: April 24, METRO DISTRICT COUNTIES and CITIES

Special State Funding Programs Breakout Session #5C Funding Programs Track. October 25, 2012

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

TAC Agenda Item 5A Mailout - 04/13/16

KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT PMOC PROGESS REPORT 2014 Fiscal Quarter 1 October 1 December 31, 2013

PRESENTER: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer

Transportation Improvement Program

2. Transportation Alternatives Program Activities Regulations and Guidelines... 4, 5 & Eligible and Ineligible Items...

Fiscal Year 2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

Lake Norman Regional Transportation Commission AGENDA March 8, 2017

Federal Transit Administration: Section Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities. Call for Projects.

I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan ( ) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACTS FOR TEMPORARY STAFFING SERVICES AS PART OF NCTCOG'S COOPERATIVE PURCHASING PROGRAM

Greater Dallas Planning Council Metromorphosis Seminar October 9, 2009

HB2 Update October, 2014

Long Range Transportation Plan

Special Approval per TAC Part A - LG Qualifications Statement (Local Government Agency management of project development process elements)

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

Mississippi Gulf Coast Metropolitan Planning Organization. Transportation Improvement Program FY

AGC of TEXAS Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

Lancaster County Smart Growth Transportation Program (Updated March 2017)

LG PROJECTS ONLINE TOOLKIT. Statewide Planning Conference June 2016

2015 call for projects draft application package

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

TxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

2014 TRAC Funding Application. Cost ODOT greater than $12 million dollars Increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion.

A FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTS FOUR AND SIX COMMUTER SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES

Transit Operations Funding Sources

Subject: Lifeline Cycle 4 Grant Funding

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. Friday, June 16, :15 to 4:15 p.m.

BOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

RESOLUTION. No. O!5-2.C( Resolution approving the Fiscal Year Transportation Improvement Program.

Ohio Department of Transportation. Transportation Funding for LPAs

Date: June 27, Board of Directors. Neil McFarlane

STIP. Van Argabright November 9, 2017

Transcription:

DRAF DRA Memandum June 1, 2017 To: From: Subject: Our Partners in Transptation Planning Isidro (Sid) Martinez, Direct Notification of the FY 2019-2022 Transptation Improvement Program Surface Transptation Program Metro Mobility Funding Call f Projects The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has issued a call f Surface Transptation Program Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) funded projects to implementing agencies in suppt of the development of the FY 2019-2022 Transptation Improvement Program (TIP). The MPO Transptation Policy Board selects the projects that will be funded under this source of funds. Program Overview STP-MM funding is a federal funding source allocated by fmula to MPO s with a population greater than 200,000. This is not a grant program. The STP-MM funds are on a reimbursable basis only and all federal rules apply. The development of the TIP is a process by which federal transptation funds are allocated to maj road, street, highway, bicycle, pedestrian, public transptation, and other projects. The Alamo Area MPO Study Area includes all of Bexar, Comal, and Guadalupe Counties and a ption of Kendall County. Contingent upon the availability of federal funding, the total amount of STP-MM funds available f this project call is estimated at $127,000,000. Eligible Transptation Projects Projects submitted f STP-MM funding consideration will be grouped into the following five (5) categies f evaluation purposes: Added Capacity roadway projects are projects which add through travel lanes f vehicles. These projects are to also include new replacement bicycle and pedestrian facilities. 1

Operational projects are projects which improve the operational function of a facility without adding through travel lanes. Examples include, but are not limited to, improving intersections to add right left turn lanes; adding a center turn lane; adding acceleration deceleration lanes; constructing a roundabout; adding improving intersection signalization; reconfiguring travel lanes f a multi-modal shift; constructing new reversing highway entrance and exit ramps; converting frontage road from two way to one way; implementing Intelligent Transptation System projects; constructing interchanges. Stand alone Bicycle projects are projects which construct, reconstruct upgrade public bicycle facilities. Stand alone Pedestrian projects are projects which construct, reconstruct upgrade public pedestrian facilities. Other projects do not fall into the categies listed above and examples include public transit projects, the Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program and maj planning studies. Program Requirements 1. Transptation projects submitted f funding consideration must have a minimum construction cost of $1,000,000. 2. Added capacity and operational projects on federally functionally classified roadways are eligible f federal funding. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities and multi-use paths, as examples, do not need to be on federally functionally classified roadways to be eligible f funding. 3. F infrastructure projects: only eligible items related to construction will be reimbursable; all project development costs (design, engineering, utility relocation and right of way acquisition, as examples) are the responsibility of the implementing agency. 4. A minimum 20% cash match on the project construction cost is required. An inkind match is not allowed. 5. Although the MPO makes all funding decisions associated with STP-MM funds, TxDOT is the federally designated pass-through agency f this funding source. Entities awarded funding will enter into agreement with TxDOT. TxDOT will require reimbursement of their costs f review and codination of the 6. Implementing agencies (entities with which TxDOT is able to legally enter into a financial agreement such as cities, counties, regional mobility authities, river authities, and independent school districts) will be required to sign the project 2

understanding fm and submit it along with the project submittal fm and other suppting documents. 7. If an implementing agency submits me than one project, the MPO requires the implementing agency to priitize their projects. TxDOT occasionally wks with other entities to submit on-system projects within an entity such as a municipality. These projects will be grouped and priitized by each individual entity. 8. The projects selected f funding will be placed in fiscal year 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 of the TIP and / Metropolitan Transptation Plan (MTP). 9. The implementing agency commits to developing and letting selected projects within one year of the year in which the projects are initially placed in the Transptation Improvement Program Project Submittal One project submittal fm is required f each project being submitted. The project submittal fm is an Excel spreadsheet and is intended to be one 8 ½ x 11 page only. Agencies should only include infmation within the allowed spreadsheet cells of the submittal fm (in the shaded areas only) and should not overwrite any fmulas. The project submittal package consisting of: Project submittal fm Project location map showing adjacent land use Detailed cost estimate Typical cross sections f the submitted project Signed project understanding fm Implementing agency resolution of suppt f the project and commitment of local match and overmatch (if applicable) of project Additional resolutions of suppt, if desired can be e-mailed by the stated deadline to geiger@alamoareampo.g, delivered in person to the MPO Office located at 825 South St. Mary s Street, San Antonio, Texas, 78205, mailed to the same address. Project Scing Since the MPO is expecting me projects will be submitted than there is funding available, the project scing procedure f STP-MM funds consists of the following steps: 3

Projects submitted will be evaluated and technically sced by wk groups of the Technical Advisy Committee (TAC), the Bicycle Mobility Advisy Committee (BMAC) and the Pedestrian Mobility Advisy Committee (PMAC), as appropriate, based on the adopted criteria. Each percentage categy identified below may have its own range of points based on me detailed scing criteria. The scing system is based on a 1,000 point system with additional points being awarded f providing additional local contribution (beyond the required 20% local match) towards the construction cost of a Added Capacity Roadway Projects 40% Congestion (using existing base year volume/capacity ratio, projected 2040 { 2045} volume/capacity ratio, if the project is on the Congestion Management System) 20% Cost of project per 2040 { 2045} vehicle miles of travel ($/VMT) 10% Considers safety 10% Suppts the adopted long range plan growth scenario 10% Includes safe pedestrian facilities 10% Includes safe bicycle facilities +50 points f providing additional local contribution of 5% to 10% beyond the +100 points f providing additional local contribution of me than 10% Operational Improvement Projects 45% Operational/Multimodal improvement 15% Cost of project per vehicle miles of travel ($/VMT) 25% Considers safety 10% Suppts the adopted long range plan growth scenario 5% Suppts safe bicycle and pedestrian facilities +50 points f providing additional local contribution of 5% to 10% beyond the +100 points f providing additional local contribution of me than 10% 4

Stand Alone Bicycle Projects 40% Considers safety 60% Improves accessibility and mobility +50 points f providing additional local contribution of 5% to 10% beyond the +100 points f providing additional local contribution of me than 10% Stand Alone Pedestrian Projects 30% Considers safety 30% Serves high demand pedestrian generats 20% Completes a sidewalk replaces a substandard sidewalk 10% Suppted by a Walkable Community Wkshop, existing adopted plan, uses strategies outlined in the Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 10% Incpates pedestrian design enhancements +50 points f providing additional local contribution of 5% to 10% beyond the +100 points f providing additional local contribution of me than 10% Note: A multiuse path will be sced as both a stand alone bicycle project and a stand alone pedestrian project and the higher of the two sces will be used throughout the process. Other Projects Due to the nature of these projects, scing criteria is not being specified and these projects will not be sced. 5

Public Involvement Process The MPO believes in the proactive involvement of citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transptation agency employees, private providers of transptation, and other interested parties in the development and updates of transptation plans and programs. The MPO commits to public outreach that meets exceeds its adopted Public Participation Plan. In addition to public meetings, an online public input opptunity will also be available. Project Selection Process The Technical Advisy Committee will develop an initial funding recommendation that will be considered by the MPO s Executive Committee. The Technical Advisy Committee will consider the implementing agency s priities, project readiness, public input and technical sce. When developing the funding recommendation, the Technical Advisy Committee may also set thresholds f technical sces, public suppt, implementing agency priities and project readiness. In addition to the funding recommendation, all submitted projects will be presented to the Executive Committee and Transptation Policy Board and will include technical sce, public comments, implementing agency priities, and additional notations. The Executive Committee will fward a recommendation on to the Transptation Policy Board. The Transptation Policy Board will select the STP-MM funded projects f inclusion in the TIP and MTP. This infmation and other resource documents are also available on the MPO s website at www.alamoareampo.g. It is the responsibility of the implementing agencies to visit the MPO s website regularly f any updated infmation on the project call. F additional assistance, please contact Jeanne Geiger at 210-227-8651 at geiger@alamoareampo.g. 6