Connected Care Partners

Similar documents
Practice Transformation Networks

CLINICAL INTEGRATION DRIVERS, IMPACT, AND OPTIONS JOBY KOLSUN, D.O. MEDICAL DIRECTOR CLINICAL INTEGRATION LEE PHO

THE BUSINESS OF PEDIATRICS: BETTER CARE = BETTER PAYMENT. 19 th CNHN Pediatric Practice Management Seminar Thursday, December 6, 2016

Frequently Asked Questions

Where We re Heading in Health Care. Grace Terrell, MD Founder & Strategist CHESS

Health System Transformation, CMS Priorities, and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act

The Patient-Centered Medical Home Model of Care

Accountable Care Organizations American Osteopathic Association Health Policy Day September 23, 2011

Alternative Payment Models and Health IT

The Influence of Health Policy on Clinical Practice. Dr. Kim Kuebler, DNP, APRN, ANP-BC Multiple Chronic Conditions Resource Center

Population Health and the Accelerating Leap to Outcomes-Based Reimbursement. Craig J. Wilson

Laying the Foundation for Successful Clinical Integration

DRIVING VALUE-BASED POST-ACUTE COLLABORATIVE SOLUTIONS. Amy Hancock, CEO Presented to: CPERI April 16, 2018

Medicare Physician Payment Reform:

The Healthcare Roundtable

From Surviving to Thriving in the QPP World

WELCOME. Kate Gainer, PharmD Executive Vice President and CEO Iowa Pharmacy Association

The Alternative Quality Contract (AQC): Improving Quality While Slowing Spending Growth

The ins and outs of CDE 10 steps for addressing clinical documentation excellence

MACRA, MIPS, and APMs What to Expect from all these Acronyms?!

Population Health Management. Ashley Rhude RHIA, CHTS-IM HIT Practice Advisor

VALUE BASED ORTHOPEDIC CARE

Describe the process for implementing an OP CDI program

Transitioning to a Value-Based Accountable Health System Preparing for the New Business Model. The New Accountable Care Business Model

A Practical Approach Toward Accountable Care and Risk-Based Contracting: Design to Implementation

Physician Alignment Strategies and Options. June 1, 2011

The Accountable Care Organization Specific Objectives

Building a Multi-System Clinically Integrated Network

Background and Context:

Long term commitment to a new vision. Medical Director February 9, 2011

Value-Based Reimbursements are Here: Are you Ready?

Payment Reform Strategies. Ann Thomas Burnett BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina

ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION & ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT MODEL SUMMIT

ACOs the Medicare Shared Savings Program And Other Healthcare Reform Payment Methods

PQRS and Alignment Opportunity: Concept to Operationalization March 1, 2016

Is HIT a Real Tool for The Success of a Value-Based Program?

Medicare Quality Payment Program: Deep Dive FAQs for 2017 Performance Year Hospital-Employed Physicians

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

The Role of Pharmacy in Alternative Payment Models

Reinventing Health Care: Health System Transformation

March Data Jam: Using Data to Prepare for the MACRA Quality Payment Program

ESSENTIAL STRATEGIES IN MEDI-CAL PAYMENT REFORM. Richard Popper, Director, Medicaid & Duals Strategy August 3, 2017

CMS Priorities, MACRA and The Quality Payment Program

Statement for the Record. American College of Physicians. Hearing before the House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health

Value-Based Payments 101: Moving from Volume to Value in Behavioral Health Care

Succeeding in a New Era of Health Care Delivery

How to Align Quality Reporting Across PQRS, MU, and VBPM

POPULATION HEALTH PLAYBOOK. Mark Wendling, MD Executive Director LVPHO/Valley Preferred 1

Using Data for Proactive Patient Population Management

Health Care Evolution

The MetroHealth System

The Evolving Landscape of Healthcare Payment: Incentive Programs and ACO Model Optimization. Quality Forum August 19, 2015

Accountable Care: Clinical Integration is the Foundation

Physician Engagement

Moving the Dial on Quality

The Quality Payment Program Overview Fact Sheet

MACRA and the Quality Payment Program. Frequently Asked Questions Edition

State Policy Report #47. October Health Center Payment Reform: State Initiatives to Meet the Triple Aim. Introduction

Examining the Differences Between Commercial and Medicare ACO Models

Healthcare Reimbursement Change VBP -The Future is Now

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM

The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovations: Programs & Initiatives

Passage of Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA): The Doc Fix

The Pain or the Gain?

Getting Started in a Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organization

7/7/17. Value and Quality in Health Care. Kevin Shah, MD MBA. Overview of Quality. Define. Measure. Improve

10/20/2016. Working within the Value-Based World

What s Next for CMS Innovation Center?

2017/2018. KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide. KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc.

Health System Transformation. Discussion

PURCHASER VALUE NETWORK ACO ASSESSMENT TOOLKIT

Re: Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare

ACOs & the Accountable Care Era: Emerging Healthcare Risks & Exposures. Jeffrey Lunn, CPCU Senior Strategist, Healthcare

Accountability: Physician and Professional Providers. Doing the Right Thing by Maximizing Quality. Introduction

Payment and Delivery System Reform in Vermont: 2016 and Beyond

Osteopathic Advocacy: Partnering to Advance Sound Health Policy. Nicholas Schilligo, MS Associate Vice President, State Government Affairs

A Systematic Approach to Performance Improvement Under MACRA s Quality Performance Program

MACRA The shift to Value Based Care and Payment. Michael Munger, M.D., FAAFP

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Innovation Center New Direction

Person-Centered Accountable Care

Alternative Managed Care Reimbursement Models

Prior to implementation of the episode groups for use in resource measurement under MACRA, CMS should:

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Summary of Key Health Information Technology Provisions June 1, 2010

Weaving Expanded Roles of the RN into Population Management

The National ACO, Bundled Payment and MACRA Summit. Success in Physician Led Bundles

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements

A Brave New World: Lessons Learned From Healthcare Reform. Brandy Shumaker, MBA, LPTA, LNHA Regional Vice President HealthPRO/Heritage

June 27, Dear Secretary Burwell and Acting Administrator Slavitt,

MACRA for Critical Access Hospitals. Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Webinar

PHCA Webinar January 30, Latsha Davis & McKenna, P.C. Kimber L. Latsha, Esq.

Primary Care Transformation in the Era of Value

MIPS, MACRA, & CJR: Medicare Payment Transformation. Presenter: Thomas Barber, M.D. May 31, 2016

Future of Patient Safety and Healthcare Quality

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

Understanding Medicare s New Quality Payment Program

Objectives. Preparing for Value-Based Reimbursement 3/28/2016

REPORT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Transforming Clinical Care: Why Optimization of Clinical Systems Can t Wait

Rural and Independent Primary Care.

MACRA Frequently Asked Questions

Transcription:

Connected Care Partners

Our Discussion Today Introducing the Connected Care Partners CIN What is a Clinically Integrated Network (CIN) and why is the time right to join the Connected Care Partners CIN? How will the CCP CIN benefit each of us? What is the give and the get? Providers Independent Employed Hospitals Patients What does it mean to join? Is there a downside to joining? How do I get more information?

The Connected Care Partners CIN is looking for high quality providers to join The CIN is a Pluralistic Network Independent Providers Hospitals Health Plans Employed Providers Value Proposition Improve patient care through clinical integration between inpatient and outpatient, and between employed and independent providers Joint contracting: the CIN structure enables employed and independent providers to join with the hospitals to contract as a group with insurers Value-based contracts will reward providers for quality and high value care Population health management is possible with the large regional provider network of a CIN Centralized analytic, IT, and quality improvement infrastructure Support for MACRA and other value-based contracts 3

CLINICAL OUTCOMES CONFERENCE AUGUST 26,2016 WHAT IS CIN

CLINICAL INTEGRATION

WHAT IS THE ROLE & IMPORTANCE OF CLINICAL INTEGRATION IN TODAY S HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT?

The US spends more on health care per-capita and as a percentage of GDP than any other country Health Care Spending 1980 2012 $8,454 16.5% $3,175 8.5% Average spend on health per capita ($US PPP) Note: $US PPP = purchasing power parity in USD Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD Health Data, 2014 (Paris: OECD, Nov. 2014). Total expenditures on health as percent of GDP

However, life expectancy of Americans is lower than of other countries which spend less per person Despite outstanding breakthroughs in extending life in patients with serious illnesses, our performance is poor when compared with other wealthy countries Health Care Cost vs. Life Expectancy

Hospital Care and Physician and Clinical Services account for the largest proportion of National Health Care Expenditure National Health Care Expenditure, 2015 Source: National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHRA), CMS

Percent Total Payers Raising the Stakes HHS goals: 30% of FFS Medicare payments to be based on quality or value* by the end of 2016 Already achieved! 50% by end of 2018 *alternative payment models such as ACOs or bundled payment arrangements,, 100 Medicare Value-based Payments as a Percentage of Total Provider Payments 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2016 Goal already achieved! 5 20 Yr-2011 Yr-2012 Yr-2014 Yr-2016 Yr-2018 30 50 % VB Payment Source: HHS Press Release, January 26, 2015 10

Commercial Payers Following CMS Going all in UnitedHealth's $43 Billion Exit From Fee-For Service Medicine...earning 1-6% savings from VB contracts (Forbes: Jan. 2015) $70 Value-based Payments $60 $65 Billion $50 $43 Billion $40 $30 $36 Billion Advantages: Greater provider risk Prospective attribution Tiering / narrow network Referral to low cost providers Benefit design Dan Schumacher - CFO 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 11

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - 2010 Reforming an Entire Industry Sector (17.5% GDP) PPACA Insurance Reform Delivery System Reform Expansion of coverage Insurance mandates Insurance exchanges Pre-existing conditions Medical loss ratio regs Cadillac tax Payment Reform Drives Org Reform P4P Bundled payments Shared savings CINs ACOs PCMH

A Tidal Wave on the Way. Hospitals and providers must prepare and brace for a wave of market and financial blows CMS Quality Penalties Provider Realignment High Deductible Plans CMS VB / Bundled Payments CMS Payment Reductions Medical Home Volume Impact Price and Quality Transparency Commercial Narrow Networks Insurance Exchanges Hospital-at-Home

MACRA Legislation is a game changer for ALL providers Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) Signed into law April 16, 2015 Final MACRA rule, expected by November 1, 2016 Repeals SGR, locks provider reimbursement rates at near-zero growth 2016-2019: 0.5% annual increase 2020-2025: 0% annual increase 2026+: 0.25% annual increase or 0.75% increase depending on payment track New approach to paying clinicians for value and quality The MACRA Quality Payment Program Includes two paths: The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APM) 14

Little time for strategic planning: MACRA measurement starts 2017, with financial impact in 2019 Medicare expects most clinicians to be in the MIPS program, initially CMS only expects 4.5-12% of clinicians to qualify for the APM track in 2019 Law requires MIPS to be budget neutral Important dates: First measurement year starts January, 2017 Payments based on year 1 performance starting in 2019 Rule released First reporting year Providers notified of track First Payment Adjustment 2016 2017 2018 2019 15

Providers in qualified APMs can earn guaranteed bonus pay while providers in MIPS have greater upside and downside 15 10 Medicare FFS MIPS Bonus MIPS Penalty APM +5% +7% +9% 5 +4% 0-5 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0.5% annually -4% -5% -7% -10 2026 and beyond: 0.25% annual increase for MIPS track; 0.75% increase for APM track -9%

MIPS heavily weights quality performance, and law mandates public reporting 15% 25% 50% Results of the Quality Payment Program will be placed on a website 10% Quality Cost Clinical Practice Improvement Advancing care Information (IT)

Providers are Evaluating Strategies for Alignment The Accountable Care Organization is one way in which providers are aligning Disparate provider units competing as the Health System or as individual providers Can align as an Accountable Care Organization Source: BDC Advisors

There is a high degree of overlap between CIN and ACO organizational structure CIN Typically created to bring together otherwise independent providers for the purposes of working on the triple aim Can enter into P4P or risk contracts directly with insurers CIN ACO ACO Typically created to participate in MSSP or Pioneer ACO program Providers can be part of a CIN or can all be employed within a health system Common Attributes Value-based contracting IT infrastructure to support population health Care management Focus on the continuum of care A CIN is not: A Third Party Administrator (TPA) An Independent Physician Association (IPA) A Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) A Physician-Hospital Organization (PHO) A Health Plan or Benefits Plan

We re shifting one business model to another, but this evolution will take time; for now, we are living in the middle FEE FOR SERVICE Volume driven Maximize unit price / volume Little reward for quality No incentives for coordination of care Regulatory disincentives to collaboration FULL POPULATION HEALTH Return to managed care Reward lower cost / higher quality Incentives to reduce utilization Coordination of care Lines blurred between payers and providers 20

We re shifting one business model to another, but this evolution will take time; for now, we are living in the middle FEE FOR SERVICE Living in the Middle We need a plan that works for both FFS and population health! FULL POPULATION HEALTH Volume driven Maximize unit price / volume Little reward for quality No incentives for coordination of care Regulatory disincentives to collaboration Return to managed care Reward lower cost / higher quality Incentives to reduce utilization Coordination of care Lines blurred between payers and providers A challenging cultural and financial shift will need to take place to go from filling the hospital to emptying the hospital 21

What is the structure of the CIN, and how does it work?

Segments of the provider community are not aligned A CIN structure can bring all providers together across the continuum of care. NMHS Employed Independent Practice Community Med Exec Com Hospitals NMMCI Board Employed Medical Group Provider Administrator = employed = independent 23

An organizational structure created to integrate providers CIN on same level with hospitals and the employed medical group A provider-led and provider-majority Board Physician executive leader and dedicated operations team Payers NMHS CIN Board Med Exec Com NMMCI Board NMHS Affiliated PP and MG > Providers NMHS Hospitals Employed Medical Group > providers Here We Collaborate = employed = independent 24

What are the benefits of a CIN?

When we speak with the community, we are armed with a compelling CIN value proposition Clinical integration allows providers to: (a) work together to improve the quality of care they provide to patients, and demonstrate that quality to current and future patients; (b) enter into value-based contracts that require centralized quality improvement infrastructure and a large network of providers; (c) enhance revenue through P4P and risk contracts where better management of chronic patients is rewarded (d) join a network that will build the necessary analytic and IT infrastructure to be successful under MACRA and other value-based initiatives Clinical integration gives hospitals the ability to (a) provide higher quality of care to patients in the community they serve (b) align with providers in the development of clinical pathways, standardized order sets, and other performance improvement initiatives (c) develop a better, more collaborative relationship with providers (d) improve performance on hospital pay-for-performance measures such as readmission rates; (e) position themselves at an advantage in the market based on quality. 26

When we speak with the community, we are armed with a compelling CIN value proposition Clinical integration provides patients with: (a) more coordinated and effective care management and outreach from a trusted source, their provider; (b) higher quality care; (c) better value for their health care dollar; (d) greater stability in their relationship with their doctor and hospital, and less likelihood that they will need to choose new health care providers every year. Clinical integration gives employers: (a) the ability to more effectively manage the health care costs of employees and their dependents through the purchase of better, more efficient health care services; (b) increased employee productivity and reduced absenteeism, through the better management of chronic disease; (c) lower health care costs over the long term, through the reduction of variation in provider practice patterns; 27

?QUESTIONS?

What are the objectives of the CIN for 2016? Enter into a contract with Acclaim for the 13,000 employees and dependents of NMHS as the CIN s first contract At the direction of the CIN committees, develop the infrastructure and capabilities to embark on quality improvement initiatives Through the CIN IT and Analytics Committee, select an EMR to be the preferred EMR for the CIN Through the CIN Primary Care Collaborative, build infrastructure to help practices develop PCMH capabilities

How do I join the CIN, and what are the requirements?

Benefits of membership in the Connected Care Partners CIN A summary Work collaboratively with a large network of providers to improve patient care Opportunity to participate in the governance of a provider-led organization whose mission is to achieve the quadruple aim improving the patient experience, improving the health of populations, reducing the per capita cost of healthcare, improving provider satisfaction Participation in CIN committees IT and Analytics, Quality Improvement, Contracting, Credentials, etc Access to quality improvement infrastructure and expertise that can help your practice enhance performance on clinical quality metrics Support for collecting and reporting of MACRA metrics Guidance from the CIN primary care collaborative focused on PCMH capabilities Tier 1 status for (13,000) Acclaim patients starting in 2017 Inclusion in future value-based contracts negotiated by the CIN

Payer Strategy & Contracting Committee Purpose: Oversee the CIN s contracting arrangements with payers and providers. Design Performance Incentive Plan in collaboration with Performance Improvement and Quality Committee. The Payer Strategy and Contracting Committee shall perform the following functions at a minimum: develop and recommend payer strategy for approval by the Board of Directors; develop general contracting policy guidelines and principles; oversee the Company s payer contracting and recommend contracts to Board of Directors for approval; review actuarial/cost analysis; recommend division of bundled funds; oversee the Company s provider contracting; and, review and recommend clinical performance incentive plan ( Performance Incentive Plan ) awards in collaboration with the Performance Improvement and Quality Committee. 33

Performance Improvement and Quality Committee Purpose: Oversee the CIN s gathering and analysis of performance data and practices to (1) set goals and take action, (2) identify high risk or complex patients, (3) measure and analyze the results of performance measurement activities. Design Performance Incentive Plan in collaboration with Payer Strategy and Contracting Committee. Will oversee an annual review of the quality of care provided by the CIN and recommend new goals to improve clinical performance and patient experience. The Committee shall perform the following functions at a minimum: recommend clinical performance initiatives (metrics and goals) for approval by Board of Directors; develop patient care protocols; develop clinical performance measurement definitions and methodology; prioritize and recommend performance improvement initiatives and allocation of resources to effect improvements in quality objectives; monitor clinical performance reporting; develop and recommend clinical performance incentive plan ( Performance Incentive Plan ) in collaboration with the Payer Strategy and Contracting Committee; and, review and recommend care management systems

Professional Standards and Credentialing Committee Purpose: Develop and recommend policies, processes and procedures that (1) promote professionalism of the CIN related to patient care, collaboration, and relationships with non-cin entities, (2) promote strategic growth and recruiting of the CIN in accordance with FTC guidelines, (3) allow the CIN to credential and onboard new participants. The Committee shall perform the following functions at a minimum: recommend credentialing criteria and methodology for approval by Board of Directors; review and recommend approval of each provider s credentials; review and recommend medical professionalism standards; and, conduct provider disciplinary process and recommend disciplinary action.

Primary Care Collaborative Committee Purpose: Organized to create an engaged forum for PC Providers to work together to design and deliver patient-centered ambulatory care in a manner that will increase quality, improve efficiency, and ensure timely access to primary care services. The Committee shall perform the following functions at a minimum: Initially assist with primary care provider recruitment; Chronic Disease Management: assess the variability of practice for chronically ill and assess provider, group, and system performance as compared to best practice. Transitions of Care Management: assess gaps in ambulatory care delivery systems as patients are transitioned from one ambulatory care setting to another. Includes the communication between primary and specialty care; Ensure optimal performance within payer contracts and VB performance models Design and deliver programs to improve performance.

IT and Analytics Committee Purpose: Establish a shared vision and strategy to guide multi-year efforts to develop medical informatics and analytic capabilities within the NMHS CIN The Committee shall perform the following functions at a minimum: Develop an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of available electronic health records and health information exchange technologies to support ambulatory care within the CIN, and establish consensus on short term (1-3 year) deployment strategy Achieve basic capabilities to support population health management, including the capability to share and integrate data across the major participants in the CIN as needed Build a core team of human resources with expertise in medical informatics and population care analytics focused on serving the CIN