re: sensitivity of radar system information and FOIA guidance for such information, 2005, 2010

Similar documents
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation legal Division Closing Manual

List of Standing and Ad Hoc Groups and Committees, Office of Protective Operations, (Response to Request Number )

Billing Summary for Storage of Justice Department Archival Records, Transactional Billing for Storage and Services

2000 Navy Pentagon Washington, DC Fax:

of work contract GS 1 OF0027N and HSCEMD11F00053 with CapGemini Governments Solutions Limited Liability, signed July 2011

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information to the Public

General (OIG) response to a Congressional request for agency -specific information on climate change, 2013

Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC-R) Annual Report Freedom of Information Act

Homeland Security. u.s. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC April I, 2010

Mail Stop T-5 F09 Washington, DC Fax:

Office of the Inspector General. 20th & Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC Fax: (202) Online FOIA Request Form

APPENDIX N. GENERIC DOCUMENT TEMPLATE, DISTRIBUTION STATEMENTS AND DOCUMENT DATA SHEET and THE IMPORTANCE OF MARKING DOCUMENTS

Commanding General LAW 2200 Lester Street, Suite 120 Quantico, VA Fax:

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATION At INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, DC 20511

FOIA Request Defense Freedom of Information Division 1155 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC

Student Guide: Controlled Unclassified Information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Budget Justifications, FY 2014-FY 2018

10-May-2010 (appeal)

Paul Hunter National Park Service 240 W 5th Avenue Anchorage, AK Phone: Fax:

Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) Office of Research and Evaluation (R&E),

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY 3901 A AVENUE, BUILDING FORT LEE, VA

Meeting Minutes of Defense Council on Integrity and Efficiency (DCIE) Inspections and Evaluations (I&E) Roundtable 29 November 2007

February 13, 2018 VIA ONLINE PORTAL AND ELECTRONIC MAIL

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Titling and Indexing Subjects of Criminal Investigations in the Department of Defense

Making a Request for records from the Caroline County Sheriff s Office

Questions regarding this policy should be directed to Mr. Will Karnrner, Office of Freedom of Information, at

Address: 62 Britton Street, London, EC1M 5UY, Great Britain Phone: +44 (0) Website:

1. Purpose. To issue an update which provides clarification regarding the reporting chain of command.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. DoD Commercial Air Transportation Quality and Safety Review Program

RESEARCH POLICY MANUAL

FOIA PROCESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DOD MANUAL DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) PROGRAM

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Request date: May FOIA Request Department of the Treasury Washington, DC Fax: FOIA Online Request Form

Biological Warfare Capabilities - Middle East Countries: Summary Report, 7 August 1981

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES, AND OF MILITARY RULES OF ENGAGEMENT, FROM RELEASE UNDER FREEDOM OF

NG-J2 CNGBI A CH 1 DISTRIBUTION: A 07 November 2013

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) National Security Information Manual, February 1, 2005

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the

AGENCY: Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Department of Homeland

Review of the SEC s Compliance with the Freedom of Information Act

Case 1:17-cv ABJ Document 1 Filed 05/15/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Department of Defense MANUAL

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the

(Example: F011 AF AFMC A (Contractor Flight Operations))

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 I. BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT

9/2/2015. The National Security Exemption. Exemption 1. Exemption 1

December 1, CTNext 865 Brook St., Rocky Hill, CT tel: web: ctnext.com

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. Inspector General of the Department of Defense (IG DoD)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Re: Freedom of Information Act Request Regarding Targeted Violence Prevention Program

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Title: U.S. Forest Service Boulder Ranger District and Boulder Climbing Community Memorandum of Understanding

Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR Request log for North American Aerospace Defense Command/U.S. Northern Command (NORAD/NORTHCOM),

DEFENSE ADVA N CED R E SEARCH PROJ ECTS AG E N CY

Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC-R) DTIC Bibliography, Technical Reports Collection

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Selective Service System Public and Intergovernmental Affairs Arlington, VA

Making a Request for records from the Buchanan County Administrator s Office

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Case 1:17-cv CM Document 20 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 17

The Rights of Requesters and the Responsibilities of Stafford County Sheriff s Office under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AERODROMES AND AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES. Foreword

You have the right to request to inspect or receive copies of public records, or both.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Release of Official Information in Litigation and Testimony by DoD Personnel as Witnesses

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Amendments. Related to Sources of Electronic Parts (DFARS Case 2016-D013)

Department of Defense

Case 1:15-cv CRC Document 28 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OPINION AND ORDER

US Army Intelligence Activities

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of State Red Book published by the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), 2008

Security Classification Guidance v3

Robert J. Hanson Supervisory SECURITY SPECIALIST Command Security Manager Staff CMS Responsible Officer Designated Disclosure Authority Head,

STATEMENT OF WORK FOR OIL WATER SEPARATOR CLEANING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ON SCOTT AFB (SAFB) 01 OCT SEP 17 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

RE: Freedom of Information Act Appeal (FOIA Case 58987)

Commanding General, 2d Marine Aircraft Wing Distribution List

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

BY ORDER OF THE DODM _AFMAN SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 27 APRIL 2018 COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE NAVAL INSPECTOR GENERAL

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

SECURITY EXECUTIVE AGENT DIRECTIVE 1

Transcription:

Description of document: Requested date: Released date: Posted date: Titles of documents: Source of document: Two Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) memoranda re: sensitivity of radar system information and FOIA guidance for such information, 2005, 2010 02-February-2011 14-February-2011 07-March-2011 Guidance for FOIAs Seeking Location of Radar Antenna Sites and Radar Data, December 8, 2010 Sensitivity of United States Radar System Information, December 2, 2005 FOIA Coordinator Federal Aviation Administration National Freedom of Information Act Staff, ARC-40 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Fax: (202) 493-5032 Online FOIA form The governmentattic.org web site ( the site ) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Mission Support Services 800 Independence Ave., SW. Washington, DC 20591 FEB 14 20tt This responds to your Freedom oflnformation Act (2011-003002) request dated February 2. Your request sought a copy ofthe memo dated December 2, 2005 from Director, Office of Internal Security and Investigations to the Acting Director, ATC Spectrum Engineering Services, Mailstop AJW-6, entitled Sensitivity of United States Radar System Information. You also sought a copy of the memo dated December 8, 2010 from Carol Might, Director, Litigation Liaison Office, Mission Support Services, to Deanna Hall, Gail Kasson and Johnathon Calkins. A records search was conducted in the Air Traffic Organization Mission Support Services Litigation Liaison office. Enclosed is a copy of the requested information. If you owe fees for the processing of this request, an invoice containing the amount due and payment instructions will be enclosed. Sincerely, f.ja/j-.4 Carol A. Might Director, Mission Support Services Litigation Liaison Office Air Traffic Organization Enclosure

Memorandum Date: To: From: Subject: Federal Aviation Administration December 8, 20 I 0 Deanna Hall, Acting Manager, Management Support Team, ESC Gail Kasson, Manager, Administrative Services Group, CSC Johnathon Calkins, Team Manager, Management Support Team, WSC t~l~ Carol Might, Director. Litigation Liaison Office, Mission Support Services Guidance for FOIAs Seeking Location of Radar Antenna Sites and Radar Data Radar Antenna Sites In December of 2005, the Office of Internal Security and Investigations (AIN-1) advised Technical Operations' Spectrum Engineering Services (AJW-6) (see attached memo) that AJW's database, which contained the site information (latitude and longitude) for radar antennas, should be classified as Sensitive Security Information (SSI). As a result, this information was not to be released in response to a FOIA request. While this guidance applied to both long range (Air Route Surveillance Radar (ARSR)) and short range (Airport Surveillance Radar (ASR)) radar sites, it has been discovered that the locations of short range radars are currently available to the public through the Internet. Consequently, the FAA has no basis tor withholding the latitude and longitude of short range radar sites. However, the guidance of the attached memo still applies to site information for long range radars and therefore must be withheld in response to a FOlA request. The applicable exemptions would be High 2 and 3. There has been some past confusion on this issue, because there was a period of time that AJW posted all of this data on a publicly available Web site. However, earlier this year, AJW removed that data from its Web site. In summary, FOIA requests seeking latitude and longitude for short range radar (i.e., ASR) site can be released and requests for long range radar (i.e, ARSR) sites are to be withheld under exemptions High 2 and 3. Radar Data Fundamentally, FOIA requests tor radar data are processed just like any other request. The responsible facility is required to search and retrieve the responsive records, then the facility's quality assurance (QA) ofiice, in conjunction with the facility's Technical Operations oftice, must review the records and redact that which is sensitive. However, if the sensitive data cannot be reasonably segregated from that which is not sensitive, then the responsive record must be withheld in its entirety.

The guidance for responding to requests for raw radar data, such as ERIT, remains the same. We will not release raw radar. There was also some recent confusion as to whether CDR data can be released, because Order 6191.2, STARS System Security Handbook, classifies CDR data as SSI. However, according to Appendix E of 6191.2, the parts of the CDR data that are not SSI are target, tracking and flight plan data, which is the data we routinely release in FOIA and for discovery in litigation and enforcement cases. In summary, the facility's QA office, in conjunction with the facility's Technical Operations office, have the technical expertise to review the responsive records and therefore must make the disclosure determinations for those FOIA requests that seek radar data, and then advise the Service Center FOIA office accordingly. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns with respect to the aforementioned guidance. 2 Attachment

OA'27;2DOU 11:15 ~\1 202 207 GAOl.\SI~ SI'FCTRUI.!'01.1 CY ~002 j '.:c' Memorandum Date: DEC 2 2005 To: From: Federal Aviation Administration Director, Oflice of It Prenared. hv. Internal Security Policy Division, AI?\-200 Subject: Sensitivity of United States Radar System Infonnation Your c-:-nail of~ovembcr 9, 2005 asked for recommendations and guidance on l. The suitable sensitive unclassifkd infotmation (SUI) label for your database of Ur:itcd States radar systems and micn.1wavc links. 2. Background checks or security clearances for access to this infom1ution. 3. Proper labeling and handling of SUI and Sensitive Security Information (SSI). 4. Contracting language and nondisclosure agreements for people who need access to this infom1ation. 5. Justification to withhold this infom1ation if someone requests it through the Freedom of Jnfom1ation Act (FOfA). Your e-mai J stated the database information: l. Is not nom1ally available to the public; 2. Contains infom1ation such as the locations of all United States radar systems and microwave links that send radar information; and 3. Provides infom1ation that a criminal or terrorist could usc lo spot weak links in national surveillance capabilities and to lind radar sites to dismpt or destroy thl~ vital services :md secm;ty measures they provide. Based on your tlcscription oft he database and by Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 15.5(h), it's proper to label database information SSI because l. The database lists physical assets vital to the ;:wialion transportation system; 2. Destntl~tion or incapacity of these assets would hnvc a debilitating impact on transportation security; and 3. Criminals or terrorists could usc database infonnation to evade surveillance. an aviation security measure.

O!Ji27i2006 I J: 15 F.U 202 267 G!JOI :\SR SPF:CTRI''l POLl CY i?.j003 On your othct requests: 2 1. FAA Order 1600.75, Chapter 3 has guidm1cc for marking and hamwng SST. 2. FAA Order 1600.75. Chapter 2 has guidance for access to SSI. A person does nut ncetl a security cleamncc for access to SST. FAA employees and contractors must have a favorahly adjudicated National Agency Check with Written Inquiries (NACI) for access. 3. Fnr details on writing security clauses, go to the Contract \Vriti11g Toolbox in the FAA Acquisition Toolset at http;i'l1t~lfilaj,!.t)\. We can help you crali a nomlisclosun: agreement. 4. FO!A exemptions High 2 and 3 arc suitable exemptions to cite if you gel an FOL \ request for database information. Sec FAA Order 1270.1 and Paragraph 9. Chapter I, FAA Ordc:- 1600.75 for guidance on handling FOIA requests for SSI. Our point of contact f(lr this memorandum is John McCarthy, 202-49~-5423.