Los Angeles Southwest College Evaluation Plan Introduction: Systematic program evaluation is an orderly process whereby comprehensive and educationally sound mechanisms for appraisal are implemented to provide valid and meaningful information about the program of study. The data obtained from this process facilitates sound decision-making in order that improvements can be made to optimize student learning and success. Purpose: The purpose of the Evaluation Plan is to: Structure and organize data to facilitate on-going evaluation of the Nursing program in the areas of philosophy, purpose, terminal objectives, organization, administration, curriculum, faculty, students, and resources, facilities, and services. Identify effectiveness of the program in ensuring student success. Provide structure for the evaluation of the effectiveness of the program in meeting the health care needs of the community by preparing nursing care providers who will be able to function as members of the profession in a variety of health care settings. Review student evaluation of the program to identify program effectiveness in preparing a graduate who is able to meet the demands of the workplace. Areas for Evaluation: Systematic program evaluation is on-going in the Nursing program in the main areas of: Philosophy, Purpose, and Program Terminal Objectives Organization and Administration Faculty Students Curriculum Resources, Facilities, and Services These areas of evaluation are presented in the table in the following pages. Each area of the program to be evaluated has a series of questions associated with it. A specific activity is connected to each evaluation question, clarifying where that evaluation criteria can be located for review. In addition, the frequency of each activity, as well the persons responsible for that activity are identified.
1.1 Is the philosophy of the Associate Degree in Nursing program consistent with the mission of Los Angeles Southwest College? LASC Evaluation Plan 1. PHILOSOPHY, PURPOSES, AND TERMINAL OBJECTIVES Analytical discussion and review Every 5 years with Accreditation Committee BRN or more frequently if major changes made 1.2 Are the philosophy, purposes, and terminal objectives developed, written, reviewed, and revised periodically? 1.3 Are the philosophy, purposes and terminal objectives consistent with: A. Conceptual framework and the role of the A.D.N. graduate within nursing practice? B. Teaching learning principles Analytical discussion review of all outcome criteria, and strategic longterm and short-term goals Analytical discussion and review of philosophy, purposes, outcome criteria: A. Post-graduate surveys B. Clinical and course evaluations Every 5 years A. 6 months post graduation B. Per semester Accreditation Committee A. B. 1.4 Are accrediting criteria of the BRN reviewed with a self-study generated? Analytical discussion and review As determined by BRN Accreditation Committee
2. PHILOSOPHY, PURPOSES, AND TERMINAL OBJECTIVES 2.1 Is the organization plan of the A.D.N. Systematic review Every 5 years program consistent with other departments at LASC? 2.2 Do the director and department Systematic review chairperson have adequate time for essential duties and responsibilities associated with the program? 2.3 Are there cooperative working A. Documentation of consultation A. Every 5 years relationships among the director the program and administrative, academic, and support units with LASC? with administration staff, Academic Senate, and Classified Advisory Council B. Interview with and representatives of various support units C. Administrative Evaluation as contracted B. Every 3 years C. Every 3 years 2.4 Is there adequate financial support for A. Review financial resources Every semester Budget/Planning Committee achieving the purposes of the program? 2.6 Does the nursing director have the academic and administrative preparation for the position? 2.8 Does the nursing director develop and maintain cooperative relationships with central administrators, other departments, support services, community groups, local, state, regional and national agencies? B. Review budget resources Review of qualifications and credentials Documentation of: A. Minutes of meetings B. Interviews with other departments and administrators C. Interviews with off-campus agencies/ facilities/groups At time of employment and 5 years under BRN review Every 5 years Personnel Department
2.5 Are the personnel policies for full- and part-time faculty consistent with policies for other faculty membership with regard to: A. Appointment B. Academic rank C. Evaluation D. Promotion E. Recognition of professional competencies F. Rights and responsibilities G. Salaries H. Teaching load I. Tenure 2.7 Does the nursing director in consultation with the faculty have authority/ responsibility consistent with the policies of the institution for: A. Development & administration of the budget B. Screening and recommendation of candidates for faculty appointment, retention, and promotion C. Development and administration of the total program? 2.8 Does the nursing director develop and maintain cooperative relationships with central administrators, other departments, support services, community groups, local state, regional and national agencies? A. Systematic review of personnel policies and department practices B. Review of faculty schedules C. Review of faculty assignments within department Review policies of LASC and A.D.N. Director s job description Documentation of: A. Minutes of meetings B. Interviews with central administrators and other college departments C. Interviews with off-campus agencies/ facilities/groups A. Every 5 years or as requested by faculty B. C. Every 5 years Every 5 years
2.9 Does the nursing director organize and administer the program in such a manner as to provide for: A. Clearly defined written faculty responsibilities B. Equitable workload C. Scheduled department meetings D. Governance structure consistent with the intent of reform legislature and LASC E. Collegial consultation with faculty Review A.D.N. Faculty Handbook Survey Review department minutes Review department governance structure
3.1 Are the nursing faculty members academically and clinically prepared for their assignment? 3. FACULTY Review of qualifications and At time of employment credentials and every 5 years 3.2 Are nursing faculty members involved in activities that assist them to develop academically, professionally, and clinically? 3.3 Does the nursing faculty implement and evaluate the nursing curriculum? 3.4 Does the nursing faculty participate in the development of criteria for admission, progression, and graduation? 3.5 Does the nursing faculty participate in academic guidance and consultation? 3.6 Does the nursing faculty participate in the governance of the organization and the nursing unit as appropriate for the accomplishment of the goals and objectives of the institution and nursing unit? 3.7 Is there an on-going plan for nursing faculty evaluation, retention/dismissal and/or promotion? 3.8 Do nursing students have the opportunity to participate in faculty evaluation? LASC evaluation as contracted A.D.N. curriculum committee meeting minute review A. Review of A.D.N. department and subcommittee minutes B. Review of student handbook and requirements for admission, progression, and graduation A. Review faculty office hours B. Class advisors to students Review of membership on campuswide and department activities A. Review LASC Faculty contract B. Review Personnel policy Student survey as stipulated in LASC contract (Code #2) As stipulated in LASC contract Monthly Per semester As stipulated in LASC contract Admissions Committee Faculty Contract As stipulated in LASC contract
3.9 Is the faculty sensitive to cultural diversity, awareness, and contemporary issues? A. Compare the demographics of the faculty and staff with that of the service area B. Evidence of participation in staff development activities focused on cultural awareness C. Evidence of teaching methodologies, principles and practices that indicate sensitivity to cultural diversity
4. STUDENT 4.1 Are the nursing students admitted Analytical review of LASC/A.D.N. Admissions Committee according to the policies of LASC? admission policies for consistency 4.2 Is written information available concerning admission, progression, and graduation? Student policies of the nursing unit are publicly accessible, non-discriminatory and are consistent with the organization Reconcile information in: A. A.D.N. Admission Information B. A.D.N. Program Student Handbook C. LASC Catalog Admissions Committee 4.3 Is written information concerning the nature of the curriculum available? 4.4 Are the policies for the nursing students consistent with the policies for other students enrolled at LASC as related to; A. Counseling services B. Financial aid C. Grievance procedures D. Representation on committees 4.5 Do nursing students have the opportunity to participate in professional and LASC activities? 4.6 What are the characteristics of student enrolled in the A.D.N. Program? A. Review college catalog B. Review Faculty handbook about having department meetings and governance structure C. Review college catalog, admission information for nature of curriculum Analytical review LASC/A.D.N. policies for consistency A. Student survey B. Continuing Education conferences C. Nursing Faculty & Committee Meetings Student demographics upon entrance in comparison to LASC Admissions Committee Admissions Committee
4.7 What is the level of retention in each course? 4.8 What are the reasons for attrition from the program? 4.9 Is a file of complaints about the program maintained and available for review? 4.10 What is the perceived level of approval of the LASC Nursing program by students, alumni? Statistical review of retention Per semester A. Review progression of students B. Survey failed students File of complaints reviewed A. Clinical & course evaluations B. Student survey at end of program (Code #7) C. Student survey post graduation (Code #8 & #9) A. Per semester B. Per semester C. 6 months post graduation
5.1 Is there a logical progression/sequencing across the course and terminal objectives? 5. CURRICULUM Analytical review of curriculum Every 5 years and when major curriculum changes are made 5.2 Are support courses adequate in meeting prerequisite knowledge for educational needs? 5.3 Does the curriculum provide learning experiences that develop knowledge of cultural diversity and cultural sensitivity? 5.4 What is the level of students passing the ATI Mastery tests each semester? 5.5 Are learning experiences and instructional methods appropriate for achieving course objectives? 5.6 Does the curriculum provide for individual differences in learning and abilities? 5.7 Are measuring tools available for measuring course objectives? 5.8 Are curriculum requirements consistent with those of: A. LASC B. BRN 5.8 Is the faculty-student ratio in lecture and clinical courses appropriate? 5.9 What is the level of students passing the ATI Comprehensive Predictor in the last semester of the program? 5.10 What is the level of graduates passing the NCLEX-RN first time? Analytical review of curriculum Analytical review of curriculum and course materials Every 5 years and when major curriculum changes are made Statistical review of pass rates Per semester Teaching Team A. Course evaluations Per semester B. Skills lab evaluation C. Curriculum minutes Analytical review of curriculum Analytical review of evaluation tools Analytical review Analytical review Per semester Statistical review of pass rates Per semester Statistical review of pass rates Quarterly
6. RESOURCES, FACILITIES AND SERVICES 6.1 Does LASC provide resources, facilities, and services that are needed for effective functioning of the nursing program? A. Analysis of budget B. Analysis of resources (computer, faculty resources, media, library, copy center) C. Analysis of material & equipment Budget Committee 6.2 Are the physical facilities provided adequate for the needs of the A.D.N. program? 6.3 Are library resources appropriate, current, and available to the nursing program? 6.4 Are the essential instructional materials and technologies available to the A.D.N. student in: A. Skills lab B. Computer C. Classroom D. Clinical 6.5 Are secretarial staff and support services adequate to meet the needs of the A.D.N. Program? 6.6 Does the faculty identify and select clinical facilities that meet the objectives of the curriculum? 6.7 Do contracts exist between LASC and agencies used for clinical learning? Analysis of: A. Classroom space B. Skills lab survey (Code #6) C. Clinical use A. Course evaluations B. Review of library resources A. Course and clinical evaluation B. Skills lab survey (Code #6) A. Faculty survey B. Secretarial staff C. Analytical review of: A. Clinical evaluations by students (Code #3) B. Faculty evaluations of facilities (Code #4) Review contracts Per semester Every 3 years or as stipulated in contract Teaching Team Advisory Committee