ARDEC Cluster Munition Replacement Technologies (CMRT) S&T Concepts

Similar documents
Precision Fires Rocket and Missile Systems. Brief to PSA. COL David Rice PFRMS, Project Manager. Any Warfighter, Anywhere, All The Time UNCLASSIFIED

Technology Demands on the Future Industrial Base

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF' DEF'ENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NOV

Alternatives for Success. One Program s Unconventional Structure

NDIA Joint Armaments Conference

Excalibur - a Successful Swedish/U.S. Development Program

Development and Fielding of the Excalibur XM982 Warhead

Ammunition Enterprise Cross-Service Update

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION

Development and Fielding of the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Unitary Warhead

Chapter I SUBMUNITION UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE (UXO) HAZARDS

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Project Manager Soldier Weapons Ammunition Programs

Advanced Warhead Technologies

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Precision Fires Rocket and Missile Systems

2014 NDIA Joint Armaments Conference

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Moving Target Artillery Round (MTAR) 2016 NDIA Armament Systems Forum

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

NDIA s 61st Annual Fuze Conference NAVY S&T STRATEGY OVERVIEW

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 21 R-1 Line #102

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Joint Munitions Command (JMC) Overview Conventional Ammunition Demil Program Global Demil Symposium 8 December 2015

Explosive Remnants of War (ERW) A Quick Look Threat Analysis

IMAS Second Edition 01 October 2008 Amendment 4, June 2013

Current Force. Current Force

2011 Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective

FCT and SOCOM Shoulder Fired Weapons

Steven Costa Program Manager, Ammunition Marine Corps Systems Command

ICM: BRIDGING THE CAPABILITY GAP BETWEEN 1 JANUARY 2019 AND THE REPLACEMENT MUNITION

ANY WARFIGHTER, ANYWHERE, ALL THE TIME

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Government of Azerbaijan

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Humanitarian benefits of emerging technologies in the area of lethal autonomous weapon systems

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Area Fire Weapons in a Precision Environment: Field Artillery in the MOUT Fight

OFFICE OF WEAPONS REMOVAL AND ABATEMENT BUREAU OF POLITICAL-MILITARY AFFAIRS

The Conventional Ammunition

S&T Advances Future Munitions Development Joseph A. Brescia, David Fair and Kevin T. Hayes

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

PGK and the Impact of Affordable Precision on the Fires Mission

First Announcement/Call For Papers

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Other Missile Product Improvement Programs. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Flight Controlled Mortar (FCMortar) for Precision Urban Mortar Attack (PUMA)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Flight Controlled Mortar FCMortar

Retaining Lethality Overmatch Through Science & Technology

Project Manager Close Combat Systems

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (ATACMS) BLOCK II

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 4 Page 1 of 6

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE MISSILES AND SPACE

MILTON E. HENDERSON, JR

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

US Army Munitions Requirements -- ASAALT/PEO Perspective

Office of Executive Director for Conventional Ammunition (O/EDCA)

PEO Ammunition We Make the Ammo, You Make the Difference. LTC Karl Borjes, LTC John Lewis, and LTC Joseph S. Minus Jr.

Project Manager Close Combat Systems 2015 Munitions Executive Summit. PM Panel Brief

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO

EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL

ASSESSMENT OF THE SAFETY OF US NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND RELATED NUCLEAR TEST REQUIREMENTS

U.S. Army Ammunition Management in the Pacific Theater

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Single Manager for Conventional Ammunition

PM Close Combat Systems Briefing for: Precision Strike Association. June 2009

18. WARHEADS AND GUIDANCE SYSTEMS

2018 NDIA Armament Systems Forum COMMITMENT. &SOLUTIONS Act like someone s life depends on what we do.

Wildland Firefighting

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Request for Additional Appropriations

OSD Perspective. Presentation to the 2003 Munitions Executive Summit Falls Church, VA 12 February George W. Ullrich

Advanced Capability Extended Range Mortar (ACERM) 2015 NDIA Armament Systems Forum

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Weapons and Munitions - Eng Dev

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Single Manager Responsibility for Military Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology and Training (EODT&T)

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Procedures

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

JAVELIN ANTITANK MISSILE

STATEMENT OF DR. STEPHEN YOUNGER DIRECTOR, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium

JMAC-EST 19 March 2014

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

MCO C465 AUG MARINE CORPS ORDER From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List

IMAS First Edition 01 September 2007 Amendment 3, June 2013

Empower, unburden and protect the Warfighter by providing superior armaments solutions that dominate the battlefield.

NAVY AREA THEATER BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (NATBMD)

SUMMARY COVER PAGE OF THE ANNUAL REPORT OF CCW PROTOCOL V 1. Canada. REPORTING PERIOD: 01/04/2012 To 31/03/2013 (dd/mm/yyyy) (dd/mm/yyyy)

Naval Surface Fire Support

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 P-1 Line #1

ARDEC Overview. NDIA 52 nd Annual Fuze Conference. Presented by:

2017 NDIA Munitions Executive Summit. COL M. Gutierrez, Project Manager, Maneuver Ammunition Systems MAR 2017

MARCH Updated Guidance. EPCRA Compliance for Ranges

COL Paul Hill Project Manager

Transcription:

ARDEC Cluster Munition Replacement Technologies (CMRT) S&T Concepts

Current Landscape Cluster Munitions have come under ever increasing scrutiny for unexploded ordnance (UXO) US submunition payloads are classified as Cluster Munitions & required to meet a <1% UXO rate by 2018 Legacy cannon fire Cluster Munitions in inventory not compliant Retrofit Self-Destruct Fuzing Technology has not been able to reach <1% UXO in current systems Monitor Domestic & Foreign Policy Significant opportunity to provide solutions through maturation of viable technologies 2

System Reliability Primary mode fuze reliability is a function of Arming Expected target stimulus to the fuze Initiation of explosives Propagation of explosives Self-destruct/self-neutralizing independence requires Reliability based on actions independent of primary mode actions Doesn t depend on target sensing Past M42/46 DPICM SDF efforts have self destruct capabilities in series with primary mode Series architecture severely limits ability to achieve <1% UXO 3

CM Policy & Requirement Evolution 1993: M915 Required Operational Capability (ROC) No more than 1 in 500 hazardous duds DoD Policy 2001: Memo released lays out desire to achieve less than 1% UXO 2008: Memo release provides guidance on future cluster munitions 1% or less UXO Cluster Munitions that do not meet UXO requirement cannot be used after 2018 No waivers 2010: Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM), aka Oslo Treaty Developed by countries in conjunction with non-government organizations (NGOs) To date 112 countries have signed Items exempt if certain criteria met The US as well as other major producers of CM have not signed Oslo 2011: UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Attempt to bridge gap between CCM-signatories and non-signatories Consensus was not reached UNCLASSIFIED No future discussions planned for CCW on CM 4 4

Cluster Munition Replacement Technologies (CMRT) UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED (U) Purpose: (U) (U) Schedule (U) Milestone FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Conduct Systems Trades Downselect Mature Concepts 2 3 4 Demonstrate Concepts @ TRL 5 4 5 Conduct End-to-End & Arena Test This is the current project plan (schedule and resources) with the funding as per 2016 Appropriation 6 Develop an NLOS Cluster Munition (CM) Alternative(s) which is compliant with signed DoD CM Policy that demonstrates enhanced lethality against personnel, light vehicle and medium armor targets (U) Products: TRL6 materiel solution 155mm cannon ballistic demonstration of integrated prototype Arena test demonstrating enhanced lethality blast fragmenting submunition & effective lethal area Potential to apply technology across calibers and systems (U) Payoff: Warfighter operational benefits Potential material solution for personnel, light vehicles and medium armor targets Enables continued use of critical lethality capability (U) Other Factors: Leverage TRADOC ARCIC Area Effects Assessment and USMC Initial Capabilities Document For (U) Cannon- Delivered Area Effects Munitions for emerging requirements 5

MACE Information MACE (Unitary): Unitary munition geared towards well located, point, medium armor targets Fully zoneable to 22.5km Capability could be incorporated into extended range efforts Requirement to be compatible with existing nose fuzes Leverage near precision Lethal mechanisms Multiple Explosively Formed Penetrators (MEFP) Sized to address medium armor targets and deliver behind armor effects Naturally fragmenting and/or pre-formed fragments (PFF) Address personnel targets EXEMPT from all CM policies (OSD and Oslo) 6

PRAXIS Information PRAXIS (Submunition): Submunition geared to poorly located, large area targets Four (4) full-bore submunitions Fits in M483A1 projectile payload volume Leverage existing projectile metal parts Mitigate projectile development risk Fully zoneable to MACS5 (22.5km) High-reliability tri-mode fuze w/parallel architecture Proximity, impact and time modes Lethal Mechanisms: Detonated radially Anti-personnel & light materiel targets: Fragmenting steel case and tungsten PFF Ability to incorporate wide variety of lethal mechanisms into submunition form factor Concept meets intent of OSD CM Policy 7

PRAXIS CONOPS Projectile Fuzing Fuze round with traditional nose fuze or PGK (at range) and load pertinent firing data from EPIAFS Nose fuze initiates, setting off expulsion charge, pressurizing the ogive, shearing the base and pushing out cargo Expulsion Cargo is expelled and dispersed due to rotational forces, stabilizer is deployed and oriented. All fuze modes armed. Remove round from pallet M795 Firing 22.5 KM Max Range CMR Fire projectile at intended target Fully zoneable up to MACS5 1 st 2 nd 3 rd Fuze Funtioning All three fuze functioning modes operate in parallel, removing common point failures. X Primary mode is proximity, detonating PRAXIS a set distance off the ground If proximity does not initiate, secondary impact mode will detonate PRAXIS If impact does not initiate, tertiary, time mode will detonate PRAXIS after a set amount of time has elapsed

DPICM-XL Information DPICM-XL (Submunition): Submunition geared towards poorly located, large area targets Approximately Sixty (60) submunitions Fits in M483A1 projectile payload volume Leverage existing projectile metal parts Mitigate projectile development risk Fully zoneable to MACS5 (22.5km) High-reliability fuze w/parallel architecture Multiple function modes Self contained Increase in available volume over M223 Incorporate lessons learned from past SDF efforts Lethal mechanisms: Anti-personnel and light materiel: Fragmenting steel case Detonated radially Medium armor targets (BMP & BTR): Shaped charge jet Fired downward on impact Concept meets intent of OSD CM Policy 9

XL Opportunities for Clean Sheet Design Fuze Reliability M223 & SDF fuzes relied on multiple events in series to work (ribbon deploy, back out arming screw, etc.) Incorporate parallel architecture into fuzing design (multiple S&As, etc.) Expulsion Air Fratricide: the event where DPICM bomblets expel, arm, collide and detonate, creating UXO for the system Fewer submunitions and debris Alter the arming environment Physical protection of fuze Impact environment Relied on arming screw which requires a hard, flat impact surface Omni-directional impact switch Fuze space claim Components required to fit on bomblet makes them costly, difficult to produce DPICM-XL has larger fuze space claim than DPICM

DPICM-XL CONOPS Projectile Fuzing Fuze round with traditional nose fuze or PGK (at range) and load pertinent firing data from EPIAFS Nose fuze initiates, setting off expulsion charge, pressurizing the ogive, shearing the base and pushing out cargo Expulsion Cargo is expelled and dispersed due to rotational forces, stabilizer is deployed and oriented. All fuze modes armed. Remove round from pallet Firing 22.5 KM Max Range Fire projectile at intended target Fully zoneable up to MACS5 1 st 2 nd Fuze Funtioning Both fuze functioning modes operate in parallel, removing common point failures. Primary impact mode will detonate submunition If impact does not initiate, secondary, time mode will detonate submunition after a set amount of time has elapsed

Summary ARDEC S&T looking at concepts to address Area Effects capability gap for 155mm Cannon Artillery at direction of OSD Three parallel efforts starting in FY17 Large area, poorly located, personnel to medium armor targets identified as capability gap ARDEC has been active since FY10 looking at materiel solutions to replace artillery DPICM ARDEC is working towards materiel solutions that are OSD policy compliant, NOT necessarily Oslo compliant 12

Back-up 13

Cluster Munition (CM) Policies Oslo Accord (30 MAY 2008) The Oslo Process bans all munitions with multiple explosive submunition payloads each weighing less than 44 lbs (20 kg) Exempts CM that adhere to the following criteria: Each submunition must weigh more than 8.8 lbs. (4kg) CM must contain less than 10 submunitions Each submunition must detect and engage a single target Must have an electronic self destruct and self deactivate capability. CM stocks must be destroyed within 8 years (can request up to 4 year extension) Prohibits use of existing stockpile of artillery US DPICM (referenced above) Permits German SMArt 155mm Round DOD Policy (19 JUN 2008) CM defined as munitions composed of a non-reusable canister or delivery body containing multiple, conventional explosive submunitions. After 2018, only employ CM containing submunitions that, after arming, do not result in >1% UXO across range of intended operational environments No waivers SD/SDA can reduce hazards, but are factored in the 1% UXO Until 2018, use of CM requires approval by Combatant Commander 14

Contact Information Name: Ryan P. Gorman Phone: (973) 724-6149 Company: RDECOM-ARDEC Picatinny Arsenal, NJ Email: ryan.p.gorman4.civ@mail.mil 15