Agenda. 6:00 p.m. - 6:45 p.m. - Registration & Open House. 6:45 p.m. - 6:55 p.m. - Welcome & Opening Remarks

Similar documents
The Atlanta Region s Plan RTP/ FY TIP Amendment #4. Transportation Coordinating Committee January 5, 2018

South Fulton Comprehensive Transportation Plan of Fulton County Transportation Coordinating Committee August 08, 2014

The Atlanta Region s Transit Programs of Projects

THE. ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects

Early Scoping Report Appendix Attachment B-5:

George Washington Region Scenario Planning Study Phase II

Steering Committee Meeting #1 March 31, 2016

Smart Region Smart Transportation

Regional Transit System Plan. Regional Task Force Meeting No. 1

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Executive Summary

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

REGIONAL TRANSIT FEASIBILITY PLAN

Puget Sound Gateway Program

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1

Atlanta BeltLine, Inc.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Transit Operations Funding Sources

HEARTLAND RURAL MOBILITY PLAN (HRMP)

FY 2018 Application Support Guide

Regional TDM Inventory Baseline Report

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF CLAYTON COUNTY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS MASTER PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES

Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003

Corridor Advisory Committee Meeting #52. February 16, :00 PM - 8:00 PM Progress Park Downey Ave, Paramount, CA MEETING SUMMARY

To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. the City of. Background. began the. As part of with both

The Division expects to let the following FTA/ USDOT-assisted projects in FFYs :

BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT MAJOR SERVICE CHANGE TO 595 EXPRESS SUNRISE - FORT LAUDERDALE. A Title VI Service Equity Analysis

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Long Range Transportation Plan

Shaping Investments for San Francisco s Transportation Future The 2017 San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) Update

Client: Boulder County Transportation Project: SH 119 Bus Rapid Transit & Bikeway Facility Design

FORMULA GRANTS 5307 Urbanized Area 5337 State of Good Repair 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Board of Directors Committee Meeting

4. IMPLEMENTATION. 4.1 Implementation Matrix

Western Slope CIP and TIM Fee Update Workshop

Transit-Oriented Development and Land Use Subarea Plan for Central Lake Forest Park

MINUTES MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PLANNING & EXTERNAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY.

Public Private Partnerships and Transit Not Just for Mega Projects Karin DeMoors October 28, 2015

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2014 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

Report by Finance and Budget Committee (A) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Measure A Strategic Plan Update Citizens Advisory Committee July 1, 2014

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS SUBASE NEW LONDON JOINT LAND USE STUDY (JLUS) IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT

Situation Appraisal. Section 5 PLAN REVIEW

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2018 State of County Transportation Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO

Florida s Future: Funding Growth Through Public Private Partnerships. Ed Turanchik. March 10, 2014

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

METHODOLOGY - Scope of Work

May 17, To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. Step Two. fixed-guideway. Program. for. Background

Corridor Management Committee. May 4, 2016

Gold Rush Circulator Study Charlotte, North Carolina REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY ?/2W/(T. Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Kim Walesh Jim Ortbal

Community Advisory Panel Meeting #

Request for Proposals. For NEW HOPE TO WARMINSTER PASSENGER RAIL SHUTTLE FEASIBILITY STUDY

PINELLAS COUNTY DEO#12-1ESR

Lake Norman Regional Transportation Commission AGENDA March 8, 2017

Meeting Minutes. Project: Subject: Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 Location: Attendees:

WESTERN SLOPE CIP AND TIM FEE UPDATE

Synopsis of Revised Changes to DCA s Rules for Developments of Regional Impact

Corporate Report. That Council endorse the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding; and

Urban Partnership Communications Plan

Last Updated June 20, Goal: Service Development

Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works David Martin, Director of Planning and Community Development

Appendix B. Public Involvement

Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project

Exhibit 1 Racial Profiling Quarterly Report October 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

DART EXECUTIVE STAFF Source:

Create good jobs within Alameda County by requiring local contracting that supports residents and businesses in Alameda County.

Public Information Plan

Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update

Local Economy Directions Paper

By Rmhermen at en.wikipedia (photo by rmhermen) [GFDL ( or CC-BY-SA-3.0

Special Meeting Agenda

STATUS AND KEY ACTIVITIES

2018 and 2020 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application

TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN: FISCAL YEARS Update

STAKEHOLDER VISIONING MEETING. November 12, 2015

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

I-66 Inside the Beltway Initial Traffic Analysis and Framework Agreement

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement, I-495 & I-270 Managed

Invitation letters were ed to 44 members of the PAG on June 23, Reminder invites were ed to PAG members on July 18, 2017.

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

Federal Support for Streetcars: Frequently Asked Questions

KEY TAKEAWAYS THE STIMULUS BREAKDOWN

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

VTA s Capital Projects Program & BART Phase II Procurement Opportunities. VTA s Procurement Fair and Workshop. November 1, 2016

San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) and Early Action Plan

MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #6k

SFTP Technical Advisory Committee September 19, 2012

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type:Informational Report

Request for Information No Private Transportation Provider Pilot Program to Ontario Airport

Future Trends & Themes Summary. Presented to Executive Steering Committee: April 12, 2017

Transcription:

Agenda 6:00 p.m. - 6:45 p.m. - Registration & Open House 6:45 p.m. - 6:55 p.m. - Welcome & Opening Remarks 6:55 p.m. - 7:15 p.m. - Formal Presentation 7:15 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. - Questions/Answer Session & Group Exercise 7:30 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. - Open House 1

**SAVE PPT TEMPLATE ON YOUR COMPUTER BEFORE USING** Photos are for concept and position. CLAYTON COUNTY HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT UPDATE Kick Off Public Meeting Clayton State University November 17, 2016

PROJECT OVERVIEW 3

Project Background C-TRAN started serving Clayton County in 2001 Service discontinued in March 2010 due to lack of funding Continued need for transit to access jobs and services Connectivity to regional transit system Promote more economic development opportunities 4

Previous Studies Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plans (CTPs) Transit Service Plans City Comprehensive Plans Livable Centers Initiative (LCI) Studies Clayton Extension Report (June 2014) Clayton County High Capacity Transit Conceptual Planning Technical Memorandum (September 2014) Clayton County Transit Service Plan (April 2015) 5

Clayton County Tax Referendum Approved on November 4, 2014 One-cent sales tax to extend MARTA into the County including: Bus Paratransit (Mobility) High Capacity Transit Service Bus service started in March 2015 High Capacity Transit to be implemented in the future 6

Existing Transit Service MARTA Bus Service 9 local routes serving Clayton County 16,200 average daily boardings Connections to MARTA Rail at College Park and East Point stations GRTA Xpress Service 6 express routes connecting commuters to Downtown/Midtown Atlanta 2,300 average daily boardings 7

High Capacity Transit Initiative Study Purpose: Analyze and evaluate a range of potential high capacity transit corridors Determine a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Conduct environmental planning to enter into Project Development Deliverables: Draft and Final Environmental Documents Schedule: Study completion in 2018 Prepare for future phases of implementation (final design, construction) 8

What is High Capacity Service? High Capacity service features include: Fixed-guideway/exclusive lanes Larger transit vehicles Fewer transit stops More frequent service Higher travel speeds New transit stations with passenger amenities Transit technologies include: Heavy rail transit (HRT) Commuter rail transit (CRT) Light rail transit (LRT) Bus rapid transit (BRT) 9

Project Schedule 2016 2017 2018 Activities Phase PUBLIC AND AGENCY OUTREACH KICK OFF Project Management Plan Goals and Objectives Problem Statement EARLY SCOPING Public & Agency Coordination Plan Baseline Conditions SCOPING PUBLIC HEARING Public & Agency Coordination and Input Definition of Alternatives Evaluation of Alternatives Identification of Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Environmental Studies/ Technical Reports PUBLISH IN FEDERAL REGISTER Address Comments to Draft Environmental Document Prepare Request Package for Project Development Complete Final Environmental Document Purpose and Need Circulate Draft Environmental Document 10

Public and Agency Coordination Communication Tools: Project Identity/Logo Project Website Print and Electronic Media Public Outreach Tools: Public Meetings and Hearings Alignment Tours and Community Events Stakeholder/Agency Coordination: Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Citizens Advisory Group (CAG) 11

Key Findings 12

Purpose of Baseline Conditions Collect existing and future conditions data Population and employment Socioeconomic demographics Land use and development patterns Economic development activity and trends Transportation system performance and travel trends Data will help: Identify study goals and objectives Determine purpose and need 13

Study Area Incorporated and unincorporated Clayton County Portions of DeKalb, Fayette, Fulton, and Henry Counties Cities of Atlanta, College Park, East Point, and Hapeville 14

Socioeconomic/Demographics 15

Socioeconomic/Demographics 16

Land Use/ Development Mostly low to medium density residential Transit supportive land uses and design elements at existing town centers Most development occurring in northern portion of study area 17

Economic Development Town Centers Fort Gillem South Lake Mall/Mt. Zion Aerotropolis Clayton State University Market sector growth targeted: Manufacturing Aerospace & Aviation Logistics/Transportation Bio/Life & Health Services 18

Transportation System Existing (2015) Roadway LOS Future (2040) Roadway LOS 19

Travel Trends 20

Travel Trends 21

Travel Trends 22

Summary of Key Themes Continued population and employment growth Increased demand on transportation networks to access jobs Increased traffic congestion - Tara Blvd, SR85, SR54, SR138 & I-75 Growing demand for transit for local and regional trips Transit supportive development is needed along major corridors Most development activity occurring in northern half of County 23

Group Exercise 24

Group Exercise Do you like ice cream? 97% 1. Yes 2. No 3% Yes No 25

Group Exercise How satisfied are you with the current MARTA and GRTA transit frequency in the study area? 1. Not at all satisfied 2. Unsatisfied 3. Neutral 25% 42% 19% 11% 4. Satisfied 3% 5. Very satisfied Not at all satisfied Unsatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very satisfied 26

Group Exercise How satisfied are you with the current MARTA and GRTA transit coverage in the study area? 1. Not at all satisfied 40% 31% 23% 2. Unsatisfied 3. Neutral 4. Satisfied 3% 3% 5. Very satisfied Not at all satisfied Unsatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very satisfied 27

Group Exercise What are the most important major corridors for improved transit service (choose the top 3)? 1. US 19/41 (Tara Boulevard) 2. US 23 (Moreland Avenue) 3. SR 54 (Jonesboro Road) 4. SR 85 5. SR 138 6. SR 139 (Riverdale Road) 7. SR 331 (Forest Parkway) US 19/41 (Tara Boulevard) 28 24% SR 54 (Jonesboro Road) US 23 (Moreland Avenue) 6% 24% 8% 14% 10% SR 85 SR 138 SR 139 (Riverdale Road) 13% SR 331 (Forest Parkway)

Group Exercise What do you see as the major destinations in the study area (choose the top 3)? 1. Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport 2. Forest Park/Gillem Logistics Center (Old Fort Gillem) 3. Southlake Mall/Clayton State University 29% 10% 29% 1% 5% 5% 17% 4% 4. Lake City 5. Morrow 6. Riverdale 7. Jonesboro 8. Lovejoy Southlake Mall/Clayton... Hartsfield-Jackson Atlan.. Forest Park/Gillem Logis... Lake City Morrow Riverdale Jonesboro Lovejoy 29

Group Exercise What do you see as the major destinations in the region (choose the top 3)? 33% 1. Downtown/Midtown Atlanta 2. Buckhead 14% 15% 13% 3. Perimeter Center 4. South Fulton County 5. Fayetteville 6. McDonough 7. Stockbridge 8. Northlake/Tucker 9. Emory/Decatur Downtown/Midtown At... 30 Buckhead Perimeter Center 6% 7% South Fulton County Fayetteville McDonough Stockbridge Northlake/Tucker 6% 7% 1% Emory/Decatur

Group Exercise What is the most important characteristic of transit to you (choose the top two)? 1. Service that is consistently ontime 2. Frequent service 3. Extended hours of service 4. Extensive coverage 5. Shorter trip time 6. Real time data (at stops and on a mobile app) 7. Amenities (shelters, benches, trash cans, etc.) Service that is consistent.. Frequent service 23% 19% 17% 13% 13% 13% 3% Extended hours of service Extensive coverage Shorter trip time Real time data (at stops... Amenities (shelters, ben... 31

Group Exercise How long are you willing to walk to access a high capacity transit station? 28% 38% 28% 1. 5 minutes or less 2. 5 to 10 minutes 3. 10 to 15 minutes 4. 15 minutes or more 5% 5 minutes or less 5 to 10 minutes 10 to 15 minutes 15 minutes or more 32

Group Exercise How long are you willing to wait for a high capacity transit vehicle at a station? 46% 43% 1. 10 minutes or less 2. 10 to 15 minutes 3. 15 to 20 minutes 4. 20 to 30 minutes 11% 0% 10 minutes or less 10 to 15 minutes 15 to 20 minutes 20 to 30 minutes 33

Group Exercise What type of development do you support at high capacity transit stations? 1. 2. 22% 53% 25% 1. High density 2. Medium density 3. Low density 3. High density Medium density Low density 34

Next Steps 35

Next Steps Winter 2016 Spring 2017 Complete Kick Off Public Meetings Continue Data Collection and Analysis Develop Purpose and Need Identify and Evaluate Potential Transit Alternatives Conduct Early Scoping Public and Agency Meetings 36

Fare Evasion Studies Questions? 37