II. HUETTER ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY PROCESS

Similar documents
Cooperatively Developing a Transportation System for all of Kootenai County, Idaho KCATT MEETING AGENDA

Cooperatively Developing a Transportation System for all of Kootenai County, Idaho KCATT MEETING AGENDA

Cooperatively Developing a Transportation System for all of Kootenai County, Idaho KCATT MEETING AGENDA

CALL BEFORE YOU DIG KOOTENAI COUNTY AGENCY CONTACT LIST 2013

Sandpoint Airport. FY Overall Goal Amendment to the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

Kootenai County Sheriff's Office Daily Activity Log

REGULATORY MARKER APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

HB2 Update October, 2014

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Click to edit Master title style

Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?

REPORT TO THE 2002 HAWAII STATE LEGISLATURE

IDAHO WASHINGTON AQUIFER COLLABORATIVE

Mark A. Doctor, PE CAREER PATH

Client: Boulder County Transportation Project: SH 119 Bus Rapid Transit & Bikeway Facility Design

STATE HIGHWAY (SH) 34 FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETING

WORK SESSION ITEM City Council

Route 58 PPTA Project Finance Plan Annual Update Hillsville to Stuart Corridor. Submitted By:

Federal Programs for Heritage and Cultural Tourism

NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

FINANCING HIGHWAY IN MEXICO: CONCESSIONS (BOT) AND PUBLIC - PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPP) ASPECTS, CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS Luis Rocha Chiu

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

South Carolina s. Road Map to the Future

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

3 MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS HIGHWAY 50 TO WESTON ROAD, CITY OF VAUGHAN STATUS UPDATE, PROJECT 8066

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2014 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

Weekly Crime Review June 8 14, 2018

The Use of Wis DNR Grants for Stream Monitoring. Eileen Trainor and Pat Sheahan Wisconsin DNR October 6, 2007

Wisconsin DNR Administered Programs. Aids For The Acquisition And Development Of Local Parks (ADLP)

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

TRANSPORTATION. Roles and Responsibilities

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update

Greater Cambridge Partnership Executive Board. Chris Tunstall Interim Transport Director. Western Orbital

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

Nevada Department of Transportation Traffic Operations Policy Memorandum Traffic Signal Warrant Approval Process

Long Range Transportation Plan

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

L e t t e r o f I n t e r e s t : S t r u c t u r e s D e s i g n ( B r i d g e ) - S t a t e w i d e

Appendix F Public Meeting Summaries. F1: May 2013 Public Meeting Summary F2: September 2013 Public Meeting Summary

AGENDA Rural Transportation Advisory Committee Tuesday, September 20 th, :00 p.m. Water Street Center, 401 East Water Street, Charlottesville

Legislative Study of State Funding for Local Road Improvements

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

PINELLAS COUNTY DEO#12-1ESR

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Town of Brattleboro, VT

Public Meeting #5 Summary

MEMBERS PRESENT: Dedrick Denton Chair Scott Warren Vice Chair Jerry Barnes (Pinal County) (Gila County) (Globe)

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

The Public Participation Plan for Transportation Planning

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

Guidance. Historical Studies Review Procedures

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

2013 Louisiana Transportation Conference

I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

Build America Transportation Investment Center. Office of the Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation

Grant Line Road Corridor Study Open House Meeting #2 March 5, :30-7:30PM Mission City Church 5555 W. Grant Line Road, Tracy CA 95304

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Cheyenne desires to participate in the Business Ready Community, Community Readiness Grants Program; and

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

2. Transportation Alternatives Program Activities Regulations and Guidelines... 4, 5 & Eligible and Ineligible Items...

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Interstate Tolling for Wisconsin: Why and How

2018 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Overview Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency

FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Garland County Tea Party

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

Goals, Objectives and Recommendations

REGION _CHAPTER 2: REGIONAL SETTING

BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP ]

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

MARTIN METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN (COOP)

Sheffield City Region Mayoral Combined Authority. Additional evidence, such as letters of support, maps or plans should be included in an annex.

LAKE~SUMTER MPO 2035 TRANSPORTATION PLAN & LAND USE WORKSHOP

Council History March 6, 2007 Council approved amendments to the Municipal Development Plan Bylaw

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement, I-495 & I-270 Managed

DOT FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRANSPORTATION ASSETS

Draft Project Coordination Plan

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

Transport NI York Street Interchange APPENDIX A PROJECT BRIEF

Sheriff s Office. k o o t e n a i c o u n t y HERBIG DESIGN INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

Oregon Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. STIP Users Guide

4. IMPLEMENTATION. 4.1 Implementation Matrix

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

MINUTES OF THE FOURTH MEETING SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL FREEWAY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

FLORENCE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

The Atlanta Region s Plan RTP/ FY TIP Amendment #4. Transportation Coordinating Committee January 5, 2018

MADISON COUNTY MISSISSIPPI UNITED FOR PROGRESS

TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

Transcription:

II. HUETTER ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY PROCESS This chapter introduces the project s sponsor, provides a project history, and establishes the context for which the Right of Way Needs Map is completed. PROJECT SPONSOR The Huetter Road Corridor Study s sponsor is the Kootenai County Metropolitan Planning Organization (KMPO). The KMPO Board is the agency responsible for transportation planning and travel demand modeling at the regional level within Kootenai County and serves as a coordinator of all multi-modal planning within the County. The KMPO provides a coordinated planning effort between the public, cities, small towns, Highway Districts, County, state, transit providers, and the Coeur d Alene Tribe. The KMPO Board consists of representatives from the Cities of Coeur d'alene, Hayden, Post Falls, Rathdrum, Idaho Transportation Department (ITD), Kootenai County, East Side Highway District, Lakes Highway District, Post Falls Highway District, and Worley Highway District. The KMPO has a technical advisory transportation committee, Kootenai County Area Transportation Team (KCATT). The KCATT meets monthly to discuss and advise the KMPO Board on technical transportation issues. The KCATT also served as the Strategic Advisory Committee for the study. Page 7

PROJECT HISTORY The corridor has been considered as a viable future transportation route in Kootenai County for a number of years. The project has been included in prior study efforts: Project was first formally considered and adopted in Kootenai County Transportation Plan (KCATT), 1997 2017. Plan development included public involvement efforts. KCATT Plan recommended an upgraded facility connecting US 95 at SH 53, to Interstate 90 in the Huetter Road area, and south across the Spokane River connecting to US 95. Included in the US 95 Corridor Plan as the Huetter Bypass or Alternate Route for US 95. Study started in Summer 2000. Plan included extensive public involvement process. Recommended as a study Short Term Improvement to preserve right of way along Huetter Road. Recommended as a study Long Term Project to construct a high-speed facility along existing US 95 or an alternate route. Current Huetter Corridor Study is a continuation of prior efforts. The Huetter Corridor Study provides the foundation for the Right of Way Needs Map. Current and forecast travel demands were used from the regional travel demand model maintained by KMPO. The model s results illustrate that future traffic volumes and system capacity deficiencies cannot be accommodated without additional transportation system improvements. These findings from the travel demand model, which support the project s purpose and need, have led to the development of a Right of Way Needs Map. STUDY AREA As stated in the project s goals, the study provides an alternate route for some of the US 95 and SH 41 traffic to meet regional mobility needs. Therefore, at the inception of the Huetter Road Corridor study, a wide breadth of north and south travel within Kootenai County was examined. As illustrated in Figure 3, the project s original Study Area was generally bounded by Meyer Road on the west, SH 53 on the north, Atlas Road on the east, and US 95 south of the Spokane River. Originally, the study would have included a facility extension over the Spokane River connecting to US Highway 95 in the Cougar Gulch area or further south. Page 8

Initial analysis of the Study Area south of the Spokane River yielded many obstacles to providing a route that by-passed much of the congestion at the Interstate 90 and US 95 interchange. These obstacles include locating a feasible and community endorsable location for a new Spokane River crossing, developing a new facility over difficult and significant vertical grades and terrain found south of the river, and avoiding potentially large impacts to existing private properties and existing conservation easements. Thus, it was determined by KMPO to exclude, at this time, the area south of the Spokane River and focus corridor planning efforts north of Interstate 90. Figure 4 illustrates the revised Corridor Study Area. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The study included an extensive public involvement effort with several formal and informal presentations, open house meetings, and opportunities for comments from local jurisdictions, the KMPO, and local developers and landowners. In addition to the public meetings, project information was posted to the KMPO website and was updated regularly to include project related information. These meetings were instrumental in gathering background information regarding future growth and future facility needs. Comments received helped guide the development process and form the final Right of Way Needs Map. Conducting individual agency meetings as well as a number of KMPO Board meetings served as a venue for public input and discussion of the study. A Frequently Asked Questions paper was also developed for the study. The dates and agencies presentations are listed below: Public Open House in Post Falls Date January 12, 2006 January 24, 2006 February 2, 2006 February 3, 2006 February 3, 2006 February 9, 2006 Participant Associated Highway Districts of Kootenai County KCATT KMPO City of Post Falls Post Falls Highway District City of Coeur d Alene City of Hayden Lakes Highway District Kootenai County The Frequently Asked Questions paper and summaries of Public Comments received are included in the Appendices of this report. Page 10