Improving Probation and Alternatives to Incarceration in New York State:

Similar documents
Justice Reinvestment in Arkansas

Compilation of Michigan Sentencing and Justice Reinvestment Analyses

Montana Commission on Sentencing

Parole Decision Making in Montana

Justice Reinvestment in Indiana Analyses & Policy Framework

Justice Reinvestment in Arkansas

Outcomes Analyses: Prepared 2/04/04 by Lois A. Ventura, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Justice College of Health and Human Services University of Toledo

Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing

Agenda: Community Supervision Subgroup

WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS SMITH, MSSW TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION

Second Chance Act Grants: Guidance for Smart Proba7on Applicants

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2013 to FISCAL YEAR 2022

Circuit Court of Cook County Performance Metrics Department Adult Probation

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2012 to FISCAL YEAR 2021

STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Plan. Assembly Bill 109 and 117. FY Realignment Implementation

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Factors Impacting Recidivism in Vermont. Report to House and Senate Committees April 21, 2011

*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections

Justice Reinvestment in Kansas (House Bill 2170) Kansas BIDS Conference October 8 & 9, 2015

North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 to FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015

Testimony of Michael C. Potteiger, Chairman Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole House Appropriations Committee February 12, 2014

Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates

5/25/2010 REENTRY COURT PROGRAM

OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER Matthew Foley

DOC & PRISONER REENTRY

Correctional Program Evaluation: Offenders Placed on Probation or Released from Prison in FY 2013

Consensus Report of the Arkansas Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections

Justice Reinvestment in Missouri

Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995

Defining the Nathaniel ACT ATI Program

IN JUNE 2012, GOVERNOR SAM BROWNBACK,

Chapter 5 COMMUNITY SUPERVISION. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear

The Florida Legislature

DISABILITY-RELATED INQUIRIES CONCERNING INDIVIDUALS INCARCERATED IN PRISON. Prepared by the Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania

Statewide Misdemeanant Confinement Program Annual Report Fiscal Year North Carolina Sheriffs' Association

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

The Primacy of Drug Intervention in Public Safety Realignment Success. CSAC Healthcare Conference June 12, 2013

Correctional Program Evaluation: Offenders Placed on Probation or Released from Prison in Fiscal Year 2010/11

Addressing the Re-entry Needs of Inmates with Serious Mental Illness. Council for State Governments St. Petersburg, Florida July 8, 2008

After years of steady decline, Rhode Island s

A Preliminary Review of the Metropolitan Detention Center s Community Custody Program

Justice Reinvestment in West Virginia

Pamela K. Lattimore, Debbie Dawes and Stephen Tueller RTI International

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

St. Louis County Public Safety Innovation Fund Report

SUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Board of Pardons and Paroles Correctional Managed Health Care Committee

Rehabilitative Programs and Services

North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission

JANUARY 2013 REPORT FINDINGS AND INTERIM RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS. Legislative Budget Board Criminal Justice Forum October 4, 2013

Office of Criminal Justice Services

Annual Report

HOPE: Theoretical Underpinnings and Evaluation Findings

6,182 fewer prisoners

Montgomery County s Continuity of Care (COC) Court for Mentally Ill Probationers: Process Evaluation

Responding to Racial Disparities in Multnomah County s Probation Revocation Outcomes

CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRENDS

Screening, Special Defender s Office Help County Better Handle Mentally Ill in Jail By Logan Carter Lubbock Avalanche-Journal October 31, 2010

Racial Bias and Probation: Research Findings and Real World Strategies

Closing the Revolving Door: Community. National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 2, 2011

Public Safety Trends Report Year End Review

RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROBATION DEP ARTME Serving Courts Protecting Our Community Changing Lives

Proposal for Prosecutor s Substance Abuse Diversion Program

Harris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Harris County Sequential Intercept Model

SHELBY COUNTY, ALABAMA VETERANS COURT PROGRAM MENTOR GUIDE INTRODUCTION

Correctional Populations in the United States, 2009

During 2011, for the third

Justice Reinvestment in Massachusetts

San Francisco Adult Probation Department. Fiscal Year Annual Report

County Associations and State Governments: Working Together Toward Smart Justice

Nathaniel Assertive Community Treatment: New York County Alternative to Incarceration Program. May 13, 2011 ACT Roundtable Meeting

Oregon Criminal Justice Commission Joint Ways and Means Public Safety Committee Agency Presentation

CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRENDS

Program Guidelines and Procedures Supersedes: January 6, for Adult Transitional Case Management

Marin County STAR Program: Keeping Severely Mentally Ill Adults Out of Jail and in Treatment

Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program. Michael S. Carona, Sheriff~Coroner Orange County Sheriff s s Department

PRE-RELEASE TERMINATION AND POST-RELEASE RECIDIVISM RATES OF COLORADO S PROBATIONERS: FY2014 RELEASES

Harris County - Jail Population September 2016 Report

Justice Reinvestment Act Implementation Evaluation Report

IC Chapter 2. State Grants to Counties for Community Corrections and Charges to Participating Counties for Confined Offenders

Reducing Recidivism in Vermont

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Act

2 nd Circuit Court- District Division- Plymouth PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK 5/11/16

Criminal Justice Review & Status Report

GENESEE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE 2017 PROGRAM BUDGET

PROJECTING THE IMPACTS OF A COERCED ABSTINENCE PROBATION MODIFICATION PROGRAM IN NORTH CAROLINA

September 2011 Report No

Development of Houston Veterans Court

Deputy Probation Officer I/II

RE: Grand Jury Report: AB109/AB117 Realignment: Is Santa Clara County Ready for Prison Reform?

Performance Incentive Funding

Tarrant County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

The Criminal Justice Information System at the Department of Public Safety and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. May 2016 Report No.

PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENTIN ORANGECOUNTY

Over the past decade, the number of people in North

The Final Report of the Evaluation of the Court Support Services Division s Probation Transition Program

Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109)

The National Institute of Justice s Evaluation of Second Chance Act Adult Reentry Courts: Program Characteristics and Preliminary Themes from Year 1

Overview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System

Transcription:

Improving Probation and Alternatives to Incarceration in New York State: INCREASING PUBLIC SAFETY & REDUCING SPENDING ON PRISONS AND JAILS February 2013 This project is a partnership between the Council of State Governments Justice Center and the New York Division of Criminal Justice Services

Building on Proba5on s Strong Founda5on 2012. Deputy Secretary for Public Safety, Liz Glazer, requests a review of New York s Proba@on and ATI system. New York has a strong proba4on and ATI system. ü Between 2002 and 2011, the percentage of adults on proba@on who were rearrested declined 31 percent. ü New York has a robust community of ATIs, who have largely been successful in reaching and trea@ng clients with a high risk of recidivism. 2

Looking forward New York state and coun@es spend $280 million each year to supervise 117,000 proba4oners. When proba@oners fail on supervision, New York state and coun@es spend approximately $100 million on jail and prison costs. ü More than one out of every six (17 percent) adults admised to prison commised a crime or a condi@on viola@on while under proba4on supervision. ü Approximately 6,100 proba@oners were resentenced to jail in 2011 because they commised a new crime or violated condi@ons of proba@on while under supervision. ü In New York City, 80 percent of proba@oners successfully completed proba@on; proba@oners in the rest of the state had a 65 percent success rate. 3

Looking forward New York statutes require proba4oners to be supervised longer than many other states: ü Felony proba@on terms are fixed at 5 years in New York. Other states typically give judges discre@on to set terms between 2-5 years. ü Misdemeanor proba@on terms are fixed at 3 years in most cases, 1 year in others. Other states set terms of 6 months to 24 months. New York s longer proba@on sentences @e up proba@on supervision resources on individuals long a`er they are likely to be rearrested. 4

1. Reduce Proba5on Terms BACKGROUND TERM FOR MISDEMEANOR PROBATIONERS TERM FOR FELONY PROBATIONERS 36 60 Most proba@oners who will be rearrested do so during the first 6-12 months on supervision, limi@ng the value of the much longer supervision terms required by New York s current statutes. PROPOSAL IMPACT Proposal will reduce proba@on popula@on by 8,305 by 2018 which will strengthen proba@on by reducing caseloads and contribute to reduc@ons in reconvic@ons. 5

2. Eliminate PSI Requirement for cases facing 1 year or less BACKGROUND 24,000 PSIs are completed each year for individuals facing jail sentences of one year or less. 6.3 HRS Each PSI takes an average of 6.3 hours to complete PROPOSAL Eliminate the mandate that PSIs must be conducted whenever someone is facing a jail sentence of one year or less, but ensure the court s@ll has the op@on to order a PSI when it is appropriate. IMPACT 151,200 HRS PROBATION OFFICER HOURS SAVED BY ELIMINATING THIS REQUIREMENT These hours should be reallocated to strengthen proba@on by increasing supervision for higher- risk proba@oners. 6

3. Require coun5es develop swih, certain, graduated responses BACKGROUND 69% of proba@on revoca@ons are for technical viola@ons. of proba@on departments reported that they do not have a wrisen policy defining 1/3 their department s use of graduated sanc@ons (CSG Jus@ce Center Survey, 2012) PROPOSAL Require coun@es to develop swi`, certain graduated responses to hold proba@oners more accountable and provide them the authority to address non- compliance. > For certain sanc@ons (in- pa@ent treatment, house arrest, curfew, 1-3 day jail stay) establish an expedited process to allow proba@on and the court to respond swi`ly to noncompliance. > For other sanc@ons that are more restric@ve (GPS, incarcera@on, extension of proba@on terms, within 90 days), follow standard VOP process (i.e within 90 days). IMPACT Strengthen proba@on and contribute to reduc@ons in reconvic@ons. 7

4. Reinvest and Improve ATIs/Risk Reduc5on Programs Intensive community- based services are not always available for people who might otherwise be incarcerated (i.e. felony cases) or who would benefit from these services (i.e. higher risk cases). 75% OF ALL ATI PROGRAM DISCHARGES ARE MISDEMEANORS 2/3 OF ALL ATI PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS ARE LOW RISK 8

4. Reinvest and Improve ATIs/Risk Reduc5on Programs BACKGROUND 33% (10,318) of all proba@oners are reconvicted within 5 years. PROPOSAL Reinvest $5 M/year of state savings in effec@ve, risk- reduc@on programs in order to achieve a 10% reduc@on in reconvic@ons over 5 yrs. through policies strengthening proba@on: Reduced caseloads (proba@on terms + PSI policy) Graduated responses Improvements in ATIs + targe@ng resources to high risk offenders 10% REDUCTION IN RECONVICTIONS OVER 5 YEARS 1,032 FEWER RECONVICTIONS by 2019 IMPACT $3.8 Million ANNUAL PRSION SAVINGS FULLY REALIZED IN 2019 $4.5 Million ANNUAL JAIL SAVINGS FULLY REALIZED IN 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Percent Recidivism Reduc@on 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Avoided Reconvic@ons 206 413 619 825 1032

5. Limit jail stays for the first resentence for technical viola@ons and require violators return to proba@on supervision a`er release (misdemeanor and non- violent, non- DWI felony proba5oners) BACKGROUND $100M Annual cost to incarcera@on (Prison + Jail) proba@oners who commised new crimes or violated supervision condi@ons. 1/3 or $33 million is spent on technical proba@on violators alone. PROPOSAL First- @me resentences for technical proba@on violators 90- DAY JAIL SANCTION FOR NON- VIOLENT, NON- VTL (DWI) FELONY PROBATIONERS 60- DAY JAIL SANCTION FOR MISDEMEANOR PROBATIONERS IMPACT $5 Million ANNUAL PRISON SAVINGS FULLY REALIZED IN 2017 $6 Million ANNUAL JAIL SAVINGS FULLY REALIZED IN 2017 SUPERVISION REQUIRE PROBATIONERS RETURN TO SUPERVISION AFTER JAIL SANCTION Increase proba@on popula@on by 1,591 by 2016 10

The Solu5on savings ANNUAL SAVINGS AFTER FULL IMPLEMENTATION costs public safety 1. Reduce length of felony proba@on terms from fixed 5 yrs. to a 3, 4, or 5 yr. term. Reduce length of misdemeanor terms from a fixed 3 yr. to 2 or 3 yrs. 2. Eliminate the Pre- Sentence Inves@ga@ons (PSI) requirement for cases facing one- year of jail or less. 3. Require coun@es to develop swi`, graduated responses to hold proba@oners more accountable 4. Reinvest and improve cost- effec@ve, risk reduc@on and ATI programming REDUCE PROBATION POPULATION BY 8,305 BY 2018 FREE UP 151,200 HOURS OF PROBATION OFFICER TIME EACH YEAR $3.8 Million ANNUAL PRSION SAVINGS FULLY REALIZED IN 2019 $4.5 Million ANNUAL JAIL SAVINGS FULLY REALIZED IN 2019 $5 Million EACH YEAR 2014-2018 STRENGTHENING PROBATION SUPERVISION, REDUCING CASELOADS, IMPROVING RESPONSES TO VIOLATIONS AND REINVESTING IN PROGRAMS, A 10% REDUCTION IN PROBATION RECONVICTIONS IS EXPECTED BY 2019. 5. Limit jail stays for the first resentence for technical viola@ons and require violators return to proba@on supervision a`er release (misdemeanor and non- violent, non- DWI felony proba5oners) $5 Million ANNUAL PRISON SAVINGS FULLY REALIZED IN 2017 $6 Million ANNUAL JAIL SAVINGS FULLY REALIZED IN 2017 INCREASE PROBATION POPULATION BY 1,591 BY 2016 11

Thank You If you have ques@ons or would like a more detailed descrip@on of these policy recommenda@ons, please contact: Le Ann Duran- Mitchell Deputy Director, State Ini4a4ves CSG Jus4ce Center lduran@csg.org This project is a partnership between the Council of State Governments Justice Center and the New York Division of Criminal Justice Services 12