LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

Similar documents
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT Audit and Accountability Bureau

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

DHHS Oversight of Jail Death Reporting

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. June 7, 2016 BPC #

VIVIAN ALVAREZ, Ph.D.

SHASTA COUNTY MAIN JAIL Catch & Release. Section 919 of the California Penal Code requires the Grand Jury to inquire into the

Partner Services. Custody

Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program. Michael S. Carona, Sheriff~Coroner Orange County Sheriff s s Department

APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT FOR INMATE RENAL DIALYSIS TREATMENT SERVICES WITH GAMBRO HEALTHCARE (ALL DISTRICTS) (3 VOTES)

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

Management Audit of the Department of Public Safety s Contracting for Prison Beds and Services

I. LIFE OF THIS AGREEMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

Facility Oversight and Timeliness of Response to Complaints and Inmate Grievances State Commission of Correction

2017 Balanced Budget Presentation Bill Elder Sheriff

Transit Services Bureau formed. LASD begins policing Metro Blue Line.

III. DEFINITIONS: Hours Hours Hours Prior 1st Year Each Year To Job On Job Thereafter

Stanislaus County Men's Jail Medical Care Grand Jury Case #

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR INFORMATION RFI NUMBER 652 SH ONLINE TRAFFIC REPORTS (OLTR)

GLOUCESTER COUNTY JOB TITLE: DEPUTY SHERIFF (CORRECTIONS) - PQ# 1505 SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT GENERAL STATEMENT OF JOB

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT MONITOR LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING MARCH 31, 2008

classification, shall undergo at least four hours of training on the principles, procedures and instruments for classification

43. Video Surveillance Policy

Personnel and units assigned to the offices of the Sheriff, Undersheriff, and assistant sheriff(s) have been assigned special designations.

JOINT REGIONAL INTELLIGENCE CENTER (JRIC) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)

OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT

VOLUME 2 - CHAPTER 3 THE ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE OF THE DEPARTMENT

Ambulatory Patient Groups Payments for Duplicate Claims and Services in Excess of Medicaid Service Limits. Medicaid Program Department of Health

DISTRICT COURT. Judges (not County positions) Court Administration POS/FTE 3/3. Family Court POS/FTE 39/36.5 CASA POS/FTE 20/12.38

The official manual of the Sheriff's Department of the County of Los Angeles is hereby established and is titled "Manual of Policy and Procedures.

August 7, Via Members of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA

The Primacy of Drug Intervention in Public Safety Realignment Success. CSAC Healthcare Conference June 12, 2013

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION REPORT 2018/025

Kern County Sheriff s Office Detentions Bureau 2016 Pretrial Staffing Plan

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

FACILITY DEVELOPMENT

ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTIONS:

Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 3/11/13

Alameda County Sheriff s Office provides for the care, custody and control of the inmates housed at the Glenn E. Dyer Detention Facility (GEDDF) and S

Department of Defense Executive Agent Responsibilities of the Secretary of the Army

Kern County Sheriff s Office Detentions Bureau 2016 Minimum Facility Staffing Plan

Statewide Misdemeanant Confinement Program Annual Report Fiscal Year North Carolina Sheriffs' Association

EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE OF INMATES BY OCSD IN HOLDING CELL FACILITIES

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Prison and Jails Standards Documentation Requirements

NEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES SAMPLE POLICY AND PROCEDURE SPECIAL MANAGEMENT INMATES Approved: June 2014 Revised & Approved: June 2017

ADULT PRISONS & JAILS

INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. September 15, 2015 BPC # REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT S RESERVE POLICE OFFICER PROGRAM

ADM WRITTEN DIRECTIVE SYSTEM

INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners

1 DR. CAR.LTO!\" B. GOODLETT PLACE ROOM 456, CITY HALL SAl' FRAl'"ClSCO, CALIFOR..'i1A 94102

INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF INTEREST 515-SH FOR

2012 Budget Presentation

SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT INTERIM POLICY AND PROCEDURE TESTING AND EVALUATION PHASE

Department of Defense

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures (211.03) Authority: Effective Date: Page 1 of Bryson/Ward 07/14/15 7

Highlands County Sheriff s Office

ANNOTATED TRAINER S GUIDE

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

2018 Winter Legislative & Technology Conference

Highlands County Sheriff s Office

Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) National Data Exchange (N-DEx)

Fresno County, Department of Behavioral Health Full Service Partnership Program Outcomes Reporting Period Fiscal Year (FY)

HAMILTON COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ANNEX M - EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION #13 LAW ENFORCEMENT

Applicants must attach all diplomas and certifications you may have acquired for verification.

LASD/Metro Transit Security Program

Harris County - Jail Population September 2016 Report

I. PURPOSE SHERIFF S OFFICE COMMAND CORRECTIONS DIVISION. Page 1 of 7

Medical Records Chapter (1) The documentation of each patient encounter should include:

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS & DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES GAMING IMPACT GRANTS AUGUST 2015 PERFORMANCE AUDIT

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release January 22, 2009 EXECUTIVE ORDER

Los Angeles Sheriff s Department/ Metro Transit Security Program Update

SHERIFF S COMMANDER. 1. Plans, implements, coordinates and directs team, program, unit, division or station law enforcement operations.

Monterey County Jail Crisis: Our De Facto Mental Health Facility

EMPLOYMENT PRE-SCREEN QUESTIONNAIRE

GOB Project 193 Mental Health Diversion Facility Service Capacity and Fiscal Impact Estimates June 9, 2016

The Teaching and Therapeutic Community Approach A Tradition of Restoration A Revolution of Inclusion Focusing the SUD Systems of Care Toward Recovery

PREA AUDIT: Final Report

Gwinnett County Sheriff s Office

Government of India Ministry of Finance Central Board of Direct Taxes Directorate of Income Tax (Systems) Notification No.

V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 of 1

Program of Instruction Course Syllabus

Dear Executive Jimino, Members of the County Legislature and Sheriff Mahar:

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

[1] Executive Order Ensuring Lawful Interrogations

Transcription:

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT USE OF FORCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT FORMS AUDIT NO. 2014-11 JIM McDONNELL SHERIFF August 5, 2015

Internal Monitoring, Performance Audits and Accountability Command Use of Force Acknowledgement and Agreement Forms Audit Project No. 2014-11-A PURPOSE The Internal Monitoring, Performance Audits and Accountability Command (IMPAAC) performed this audit to address a recommendation by the Citizens Commission on Jail Violence (CCJV), specifically related to training received and the Use of Force Policy Acknowledgement and Agreement Form. As a result, the Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department (LASD) revised its Use of Force Policy. The IMPAAC conducted this audit under the guidance of generally accepted government auditing standards 1, specifically pertaining to obtaining sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for the findings and conclusions based on the audit objectives. The IMPAAC has determined the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for the findings and conclusions based on the audit objectives. BACKGROUND On September 28, 2012, the CCJV made various recommendations pertaining to operations within Custody Division. The recommendations included a revision of the Use of Force policy, to include the following: Recommendation No. 3.2 states: LASD personnel should be required to formally acknowledge, in writing, that they have read and understand the Department s Use of Force Policy. Recommendation No. 3.3 states: All LASD Custody personnel should be provided training on a new comprehensive and easy to understand Use of Force Policy and how it applies to Custody. Pursuant to the recommendations from the CCJV, Sheriff's Bulletin No. 591, Significant Changes to Use of Force Policy, December 7, 2012, was created pending a Manual of Policy and Procedures revision directed at all Department personnel. It states: All Department personnel are required to formally acknowledge, in writing, they have read and understand the Department s Use of Force Policy. Unit Commanders are required to conduct training for all of their assigned sworn personnel, Custody Assistants, Security Assistants, and Security Officers. Unit commanders are required to 1 United States Government Accountability Office By the Comptroller General of the United States, December 2011, Government Auditing Standards 2011 Revision. Page 1 of 5

place a copy of the signed acknowledgement form into each employee s personnel file, and submit APIS Rosters to their respective Division Chief, no later than December 31, 2012. The Department completed and issued a revised Use of Force Policy within the Department Manual of Policy and Procedures, including the various changes articulated in Sheriff s Bulletin No. 591. The beginning effective date of the Department policy was January 1, 2013 2. Sheriff s Bulletin 591 remains active and all required information within is in effect. METHODOLOGY Scope Audit fieldwork was performed from January 26, 2015, to February 10, 2015. Telephonic and personal interviews were conducted with Department personnel, as well as the retrieval of training records from each custody facility. Audit Time Period The time period for this audit was January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013. The various populations and/or samples were determined based on the objectives, and are further described within each respective objective. Audit Population A total population of 3,169 personnel were identified for all custody facilities. A stratified random sample resulted in 96 personnel reviewed for this audit. 3 Personnel referenced within this population were identified with the assistance of Custody Operations staff. Source Documentation The following publications were used as the authoritative materials for the audit: Department Manual of Policy and Procedures 3-10/000.00 Sheriff's Bulletin No. 591, Significant Changes to Use of Force Policy 2 Manual of Policy and Procedures, Volume 3, Chapter 10 3 A one tail test, utilizing a 95% confidence level with a 4 percent error rate was used for the sample selection. Page 2 of 5

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Table No. 1 indicates the accumulated totals after analyzing the collected sample data. Table No. 1 - Total Findings Objective Description Meeting the Standard/Total (%) Objective No. 1 - Acknowledgement Forms Present in 88/96 (92%) the File Objective No. 2 - Personnel Completing Training 96/96 (100%) The required Use of Force Policy Acknowledgement and Agreement Form in the personnel file was found to be present in 92% of the audited sample. Facility Personnel are responsible for ensuring the proper archiving of the document(s). Direct observation of each Custody Division facility s records indicated they had implemented a proper archiving procedure for the documents; However, North County Correctional Facility had not, placing the documents in either the employee s training file(s) and/or personnel file(s). Custody Operations met the criteria of training Custody personnel on the revised Use of Force Policy (as it applies to Custody) per Sheriff s Bulletin No. 591. The Automated Personnel In-Service Roster (APIS), Training Records System (TRS), and Scheduling Management System (SMS) indicated 100% of the sample under evaluation for this audit had been formally trained. Due to the recent implementation of the Learning Management System (LMS), the discontinuance of the TRS, and the continued use of APIS Rosters, units using any of the above mentioned systems for tracking the required training documentation were considered to have met the standard. DETAILED FINDINGS Objective No. 1 Acknowledgement Forms Present in the File Criteria Sheriff s Bulletin No. 591, December 7, 2012, Significant Changes to Use of Force Policy, states, All Department personnel are required to formally acknowledge, in writing, they have read and understand the Department s Use of Force Policy. Page 3 of 5

Unit commanders are required to place a copy of the signed acknowledgement form into each employee s personnel file, and submit APIS Rosters to their respective Division Chief, no later than December 31, 2012. Audit Procedures The IMPAAC reviewed Department personnel records, Use of Force Acknowledgement and Agreement Forms (for assigned Custody Division sworn personnel, Custody Assistants, Security Assistants, and Security Officers), to determine adherence to Department policy. Files that contained the Use of Force Policy Acknowledgement and Agreement Form met the standard. Table No. 2 Findings per Facility Acknowledgement Forms Present in the File Facility Meeting the Standard/Total (%) Century Regional Detention Facility 13/13 (100%) Inmate Reception Center 12/12 (100%) Los Angeles County Medical Center 4/4 (100%) Men s Central Jail 21/21 (100%) North County Correctional Facility 6/12 (50%) PDC North 7/7 (100%) PDC South 6/8 (75 %) Twin Towers Correctional Facility 19/19 (100%) Total 88/96 (92%) Objective No. 2 Personnel Completing Training Criteria Sheriff s Bulletin No. 591, December 7, 2012, states, Unit Commanders are required to conduct training for all of their assigned sworn personnel, Custody Assistants, Security Assistants, and Security Officers. Audit Procedures The Unit training records, specifically the SMS, LMS, TRS, and/or archived APIS Rosters were reviewed to determine whether each sampled employee attended the revised Use of Force Training. 4 4 The IMPAAC did not perform an integrity check of the SMS, LMS, and/or TRS. Page 4 of 5

Table No. 3 Findings per Facility - Personnel Completing Training Facility Meeting the Standard/Total (%) Century Regional Detention Facility 13/13 (100%) Inmate Reception Center 12/12 (100%) Los Angeles County Medical Center 4/4 (100%) Men s Central Jail 21/21 (100%) North County Correctional Facility 12/12 (100%) PDC North 7/7 (100%) PDC South 8/8 (100%) Twin Towers Correctional Facility 19/19 (100%) Total 96/96 (100%) Other Related Matters During the analysis of this audit, the IMPAAC found inconsistencies in the archiving of the signed Use of Force Acknowledgement forms in each employee s personnel file, as required by Department policy. The IMPAAC observed units were archiving the Use of Force Acknowledgement forms in the employees training file in lieu of their personnel file(s). In addition, the IMPAAC identified units were not using the APIS Rosters to track employee training, which is required by Department Policy. However, as previously mentioned, units were considered to have met the standard if they used any of the three systems (APIS, LMS and/or TRS). RECOMMENDATIONS 1. It is recommended Custody Support Services re-brief Sheriff s Bulletin No. 591 to each Custody Division Unit Commander, regarding the documenting of individual acknowledgement, training completed by the unit, and the archiving of required documentation. 2. It is recommended all custody facilities utilize APIS Rosters and LMS for training documentation and record keeping to ensure consistency, transparency, and overall efficiency throughout the Department. Page 5 of 5