Mike Daly, AIA, LEED AP Notre Dame s Investment in the Future of Engineering Geoffrey Lisle, AIA Terry Brown Senior Project Project Project Manager Manager Manager
Learning Objectives Discover how sustainability can inform the design of a cutting edge engineering research facility Observe how benchmarking metrics validate information from stakeholders Observe how an academic clean room differs from the industry clean room and how sustainability issues are addressed Discover how the cost of this interdisciplinary engineering facility's Discover how the cost of this interdisciplinary engineering facility's design was influenced by benchmarking as a tool to represent future unknowns
Strategic Goals Elevate Notre Dame s engineering programs Raise profile as research institution Create new technologies that will create new businesses Attract top researchers and faculty Designing for engineering
Why a new facility? Identified need in previous 1999 master plan Focusing on research at all levels at the University Collaborative environments attractive to research community Higher yield research (better data & more of it) M.I.N.D. Initiative
M.I.N.D. The Midwest Institute t for Nanoelectronics Discovery (MIND) explores and develops advanced devices, circuits, and nanosystems with performance capabilities beyond conventional devices. Led by the University of Notre Dame, it is a consortium of academic, industry and government partners that includes: Cornell University Georgia Institute of Technology Pennsylvania State University Purdue University University of Illinois University of Michigan University of Texas-Dallas Argonne National Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology National High Magnetic Field Laboratory
What kind of facility More learning center space More flexible labs Best of class clean room Interdisciplinary collaboration Undergraduate participation in research Engineering on display No traditional classrooms
Site visits Jeong H. Kim Engineering Building University it of Maryland Fitzpatrick Institute for Photonics Duke University Birck Nanotechnology Center gy Purdue University
Who s on the team RFQ long list RFP short list Site visits Selection of a strong team with good chemistry is important Interviews / selection to the process given the investment of time and money.
Designing for engineering We know that t the most successful designs are the ones that involve users from the start.
4 groups - 1 community Multidisciplinary Engineering Teaching & Research Facility Undergraduate Learning Center Energy Center Chemical / Electrical Engineering Clean Room One integrated facility designed for collaborative research
Prominent campus location
Engineering g on display
Interdisciplinary learning Expose engineering by transparency Undergraduates observe graduate work in progress Attract undergraduates to engineering Dedicated area for Capstone projects
Specialized spaces Clean room Undergraduate Learning Center Imaging suite Cryogenic lab Radio isotope labs
Specialized design / issues Building operating requirements: Equipment Vibration Acoustics EMI HVAC
Learning Center Learning Center Wet Labs Breakout Flexibility Presentation ti Projects
Generating energy Ui Using energy produced by building activities to supply building energy Natural gas for Co-Gen Micro Turbine
Generating energy Photovoltaic cells
Stinson Remick Hall Multidisciplinary Engineering, Multidisciplinary Engineering, Teaching & Research Facility University of Notre Dame
Trends Highly sensitive imaging area Academic clean room Benchmarking comparisons
Highly sensitive imaging g area 125 MIPS NC 25 30-70% RH Temp Drift / Hour Clear Height
Highly sensitive imaging g area Instrument t Access Personnel Personnel Access
Academic clean room Difference between an academic and an industry clean room: Yield Tissue (growing chips) Waste generation Scrubbing HPM Use MBE Use
Academic clean room
Academic clean room 2 nd Level 1 st Level Lower Level
Benchmarking comparisons Biomedical Lab Planning How much support space do we need? How many researchers in a lab? How many write-up stations in a lab? How many fume hoods do we need? Almost as much as the lab space 100% On average 3.23 per module On average 1 per 166 NSFL On average 1 Hood per 2,200 NSFL Engineering Lab Planning How much support space do we need? Between 8 31% lab space How many researchers in a lab? On average 2 per module How many write-up stations in a lab? On average 1 per 642 NSFL How many fume hoods do we need? On average 1 Hood per 1,064 NSFL
Benchmarking comparisons 1.0 Low: 0.52 0.9 0.8 0.7.74.82.83.72.66.65.76.79.69.75 High: 0.83 0.6.52.52.61 Average: 0.61 0.5 0.4 0.3 02 0.2 0.1 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Av Floor Plate Efficiencies
Benchmarking comparisons Main Laboratory / Laboratory Support Ratio Biomedical 50% Life Sciences 30-40% Bioengineering 15-30% Engineering (Mechanical Materials Science Structural) 0-15% Synthetic Chemistry 0% MAIN LAB MAIN LAB MAIN LAB MAIN LAB MAIN LAB LAB SUPPORT LAB SUPPORT LAB SUPPORT LAB SUPPORT
Benchmarking comparisons Engineering Lab Fume Hoods Fume hood density twice as high Flexibility in system Future capacity Ability to quickly move density around
We all approached this project with a true spirit of partnering. Everyone had the same goal: to construct a very complicated building in a style that complements the other architecture on campus... Mike Daly University it of Notre Dame
Lower Level
First Floor
Second Floor
Third Floor