APPROVED: Low: Youth has a below average likelihood of being involved in a subsequent incident while in the facility.

Similar documents
APPROVED: Early Release: Release before the minimum length of stay.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE I. POLICY:

Transmittal # APPROVED:

APPROVED: Advanced Practice Provider: Nurse Practitioner (NP) or Physician s Assistant (PA).

The Department of Juvenile Justice shall provide services for each Superior Court youth placed in a Youth Development Campus.

I. POLICY: DEFINITIONS:

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE I. POLICY:

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE I. POLICY:

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE I. POLICY:

Each youth shall be provided individualized services and supervision driven by his/her assessed risk and needs.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE I. POLICY:

Aggravated Active Aggression Response: Use of a physical response that may cause death or serious bodily harm, as governed by Georgia State Law.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: { } All DJJ Staff { } Administration { } Community Services {x} Secure Facilities I.

Levels of Observation: The frequency of youth supervision.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE I. POLICY:

Intel Check: A review of records which includes a check of social media, public records, sex offender registry, and DJJ history (staff and youth).

Aggravated Active Aggression Response: Use of a physical response that may cause death or serious bodily harm, as governed by Georgia State Law.

I. POLICY: DEFINITIONS:

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE I. POLICY:

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE 1. POLICY:

I. POLICY DEFINITIONS

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: {x} All DJJ Staff {x} Administration {x} Community Services {x} Secure Facilities I.

Comprehensive Review: A qualitative and quantitative review of programs service delivery conducted by a Regional Programs Service Administrator.

APPROVED: Complainant: A person who submits a complaint to the Office of the Ombudsman.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Transmittal # 18-5 Policy # 8.8 I. POLICY:

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: { } All DJJ Staff {x} Administration { } Community Services {x} Secure Facilities I.

B POST Application Fee Log Avery. D. Niles, Commissioner

CHAPTER 63D-9 ASSESSMENT

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE

I. POLICY: DEFINITIONS:

I. POLICY: DEFINITIONS:

PREA AUDIT: AUDITOR S SUMMARY REPORT JUVENILE FACILITIES

State of Alaska Department of Corrections Policies and Procedures Chapter: Special Management Prisoners Subject: Administrative Segregation

Advanced Practice Provider (APP): Nurse Practitioner (NP) or Physician s Assistant (PA).

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE

INCIDENT REPORT. Tracking Number: # I. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION

INMATE CLASSIFICATION

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol [SPEP] Report

CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS (COMAR)

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

APPROVED: Substitutions: Replacing one food item for another food item of equal or greater nutritive values.

Quality Improvement Standards for Probation and Community Intervention Programs

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS (COMAR)

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol [SPEP] Report

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol [SPEP] Report

BUREAU OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR

Department of Community Justice Policy and Procedures

INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT. Coordination of Services for Children Served by More than One Agency

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. NO TALLAHASSEE, April 1, Safety INCIDENT REPORTING AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM (IRAS)

Primary Classes Professional Development Series IS 100 Incident Command System IS 200 Single Resources and Initial Action Incidents

Department of Juvenile Justice Guidance Document COMPLIANCE MANUAL 6VAC REGULATION GOVERNING JUVENILE SECURE DETENTION CENTERS

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol [SPEP] Report

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol [SPEP] Report

Central Monitoring Cases

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol [SPEP] Report

MQI Standards for Probation and Community Intervention Programs

NEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES SAMPLE POLICY AND PROCEDURE SPECIAL MANAGEMENT INMATES Approved: June 2014 Revised & Approved: June 2017

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol [SPEP] Report

DATE: October 3, SUBJECT: Protective Services for Adults: Revised Process Standards

Cuyahoga County Department of Health and Human Services Division of Children and Family Services Policy Statement

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol [SPEP] Report

POSITION: DATE WRITTEN: DEPARTMENT:

BUREAU OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR

State of North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Prisons

BUREAU OF MONITORING AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR

Using the APS Structured Decision Making System in the Context of NAPSA s APS Program Standards. September 29, 2015

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

BUREAU OF MONITORING AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

REGISTERED OFFENDERS IN HEALTH CARE FACILITIES

E Mail Phone Number: Agency Information

POLICY AND PROCEDURE CHECKLIST ODYS Policy and Procedure

BUREAU OF MONITORING AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR

BUREAU OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR

BUREAU OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol [SPEP] Report

Information on Mental Health Law in Tennesseee. taken from TCA Annotated. There may be other legislation on the subject worth reviewing.

CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH ACT

POLICY ON INCIDENT REPORTING AND INCIDENT MANAGEMENT

BUREAU OF MONITORING AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR

JUVENILE JUSTICE COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE COUNTY FUNDING APPLICATION FOR CY 2016

Juvenile Corrections Changes. Assembly Bill

BUREAU OF MONITORING AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE DRAFT. Title: Incident Operations Center and Incident Review Procedures

Transmittal # Scheduled Review Date: 2/15/19 Attachments: Replaces Policy Dated: 9/1/11 A - Grant Opportunity Approval Form APPROVED:

Weekly Friday Provider Call Agenda (09/22/2017) Program updates/announcements from today s meeting:

III. DEFINITIONS: Hours Hours Hours Prior 1st Year Each Year To Job On Job Thereafter

Page 1 of 5 ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Program Guidelines and Processes

BUREAU OF QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM REPORT FOR

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

Unit 1: The Prison Rape Elimination Act: Overview of the Law and Your Role

BUREAU OF MONITORING AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR

Incident Reporting. DATE: 2/17/2005; Updated 7/5/2005 Updated 10/20/05

PREA AUDIT: AUDITOR S SUMMARY REPORT JUVENILE FACILITIES

PREA COMPLIANCE AUDIT TOOL QUESTIONS FOR PREA COMPLIANCE MANAGERS and PREA COORDINATORS

Sequel Youth and Family Services POLICY AND PROCEDURE. Domain: Administration and Leadership

Transcription:

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: { } All DJJ Staff { } Administration { } Community Services {x} Secure Facilities (RYDCs and YDCs) Transmittal # 17-2 Policy # 17.3 Related Standards & References: ACA Standards: 3-JCF-2B-08, 4-JCF-5B-01, 02, 03, 05, 4-JCF-3D-03, 4-JCF-3D-05 & 06; 4-JCF-5B-01, 02, 03, 05; 4-JCF-5C-03 Custody and Housing Assessment Instructional Manual DJJ 8.20, 12.21, 12.22 Chapter 17: ADMISSION AND RELEASE Subject: CUSTODY AND HOUSING ASSESSMENT Attachments: None Effective Date: 6/20/17 Scheduled Review Date: 6/20/18 Replaces: 2/1/12 Secure Facilities Division APPROVED: Avery D. Niles, Commissioner I. POLICY To ensure a safe environment and secure operations, the Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) shall objectively classify and house youth according to standard criteria of risk, age, size, conduct, and offense history. II. DEFINITIONS Custody Security and Stratification Assessment: An objective assessment instrument that rates the risk of the youth being involved in a subsequent incident while in the facility. The risk is considered when making decisions about the youth s supervision requirements and housing assignment. Low: Youth has a below average likelihood of being involved in a subsequent incident while in the facility. Medium: Youth has an average likelihood of being involved in a subsequent incident while in the facility. High: Youth has an above average likelihood of being involved in a subsequent incident while in the facility. Housing Vulnerability Assessment: An objective assessment instrument that identifies a youth s specific housing vulnerability and assigns a housing level. The housing level and the housing matrix are used to determine the youth s appropriate housing placement within the facility. Low - Youth has a below average likelihood of being victimized while in the facility.

ADMISSION AND RELEASE CUSTODY AND HOUSING ASSESSMENT 17.3 2 of 6 Moderate -Youth has an average likelihood of being victimized while in the facility. High -Youth has an above average likelihood of being victimized while in the facility. Override -To alter the objective assessment finding for management considerations that warrant special attention or intervention by staff. III. GENERAL PROCEDURES A. Classification and housing procedures will consider the following: 1. Level of Risk presented; 2. Type of housing required; 3. Participation in facility and community programs; and 4. Criteria for changing the status of a youth when there is an increase in their custody level or a transfer. IV. HOUSING ASSESSMENT A. The Housing Vulnerability Assessment will be used to determine the appropriate housing placement within the facility. The Housing Vulnerability Assessment will be used for both assessment and reassessment. 1. A current Housing Vulnerability Assessment will be required prior to assigning a youth to a room. 2. The Housing Vulnerability Assessment will be completed or reviewed every time a Custody Assessment is completed or reviewed. 3. Housing Vulnerability Assessment may only be overridden to a higher housing type, not to a lower housing type. The facility Director or designee must approve overrides in JTS and must include justification for the override. Overrides will occur in the following situations: a. Other additional information indicates that the youth needs to be housed at a higher level; b. Youth who have an increased victim risk (e.g., sexual assault, child abuse, youth-on-youth altercations); c. The size or age criteria, which must be based upon verified data that is supported by documentation; or

ADMISSION AND RELEASE CUSTODY AND HOUSING ASSESSMENT 17.3 3 of 6 d. To allow youth who are eligible for honors placement to be housed accordingly. V. CUSTODY LEVEL ASSESSMENT A. The Custody Security and Stratification Assessment will be used to establish a youth s custody level upon admission to a secure facility. 1. The Custody Security and Stratification Assessment must be completed before the youth is assigned to a room or moved from the intake housing area. The assessment must be entered in JTS within 24 hours of the youth s admission and/or transfer to a secure facility. 2. The Juvenile Detention Counselor (JDC) will review the completed Custody Security and Stratification Assessment within the first working day following the youth s admission and document their review as a communication note. The JDC must confirm that youth s legal history is updated in JTS in accordance with DJJ 20.2, Detention Monitoring. 3. The Custody Security and Stratification Assessment must be approved by the Assistant Director (RYDC) or Assistant Director and/or institutional program Director (YDC) after the JDC review is completed. B. The youth s progress and behavior will be considered when updating the Custody Security and Stratification Assessment. 1. The Custody Security and Stratification Assessment will be completed every 90 days, or as otherwise needed, from the date the previous Custody Level Assessment was completed in JTS. 2. Trained staff will complete the Custody Security and Stratification Assessment within 24 hours of the following circumstances. a. Youth involved in a special incident for any of the following. B1P Child abuse, physical (as victim) B6P Sexual abuse, sexual exploitation (as victim) F1P Youth-on-youth assault, with an injury severity rating of 4 or more F2P Youth-on-staff assault PY1 Youth-on-youth sexual penetration (regardless of age)

ADMISSION AND RELEASE CUSTODY AND HOUSING ASSESSMENT 17.3 4 of 6 G3P Mistreatment of a youth, no injury (as victim) R1P Escape from a secure facility H4P Group disturbance P3P Physical intervention techniques with mechanical restraint for therapeutic purposes P5P Use of chemical agent b. Youth involved in three or more of the following special incidents within a 30-day period. P1P Use of Force technique without mechanical restraint P2P Use of Force technique with mechanical restraint P3P Use of Force technique with mechanical restraint for therapeutic purposes F1P Youth-on-youth assault, PY2 Youth-on-youth sexual contact (regardless of age) G5P Contraband discovered at a facility/program site PY3 Youth-on-youth sexual harassment (regardless of age) H6P Substantial property damage to state property (over $1,000 or more) c. New information is received that may affect the youth s custody level (e.g., new legal charges, new dispositions entered in JTS, updated information that was not available when the previous assessment was completed). d. Prior to a youth s return to general population from a specialized or behavior management unit. 3. Youth will not require a new Custody and Housing Assessment when they complete a special management plan. 4. For charges that are received while a youth is in a secure facility, the facility Director or designee will develop an LOP for communicating legal charges to the Institutional Program Director (YDC) or JDC (RYDC). The Institutional Program Director or JDC will enter the charges into the JTS legal module within

ADMISSION AND RELEASE CUSTODY AND HOUSING ASSESSMENT 17.3 5 of 6 24 hours of notification and prior to the assessment being completed. The youth must be assessed in JTS within 24 hours of the receipt of the information. VI. TRAINING A. All staff responsible for completing/reviewing/approving custody and housing assessments or determining housing assignments must complete the online Custody and Housing Assessment training. B. All staff involved in the direct care of youth in a secure facility must receive facility training regarding the housing plan. The training will include characteristics of each of the custody levels and housing types and facility procedures for supervising and housing youth based on the custody level or housing type. VII. FACILITY PROTOCOLS A. Each secure facility will establish protocols for housing and supervising youth that are based on custody levels. The facility Director or designee will develop local procedures that provide for: 1. Completion/review of the Custody Security and Stratification Assessment and the Housing Vulnerability Assessment for each youth upon admission; 2. Completion/review of the Custody Security and Stratification Assessment and the Housing Vulnerability Assessment every 90 days or more often when required by this policy; 3. Housing decisions for youth on observation after 14 days; 4. The specific staff member(s) responsible for assessments and housing assignments; and 5. Monitoring of a youth consistent with their assigned mental health monitoring level (routine, special, or close), custody level (high, medium, or low), and vulnerability level (high, medium, or low). (See DJJ 8.20, Room Checks and DJJ 12.21, Suicide Prevention.) B. Each facility Director will approve a housing plan that is developed by the facility Director or designee. The housing plan will provide for: 1. The safety of youth, the custody levels and vulnerability levels that may be assigned to each housing unit. If youth with various custody levels and vulnerability levels are blended within a housing unit, the plan will specify how youth will be assigned and supervised by staff.

ADMISSION AND RELEASE CUSTODY AND HOUSING ASSESSMENT 17.3 6 of 6 2. The review and revision of housing plan as needed, but at least annually. The housing plan will be reviewed and approved by the Director prior to being sent to the Office of Classification and Transportation Services (OCATS). The housing plan must be approved by the director of OCATS, who will return the approved housing plan within 14 business days of receipt. The housing plan will also be revised and approved by the facility Director prior to any change in the physical plant structure. 3. Providing a copy of the approved housing plan to the facility Director s supervisor. 4. Ensuring that the housing plan is accessible to all staff. C. Single-occupancy rooms shall be available for all youth. D. Disabled youth will be provided with: 1. Housing that provides for the youth s safety and security; 2. Rooms or housing units designed for their use to provide integration with other youth; 3. Programs and services that are modified and/or specifically accessible to them; 4. Staff members who are appropriately trained to assist youth who cannot otherwise perform basic life functions; and 5. Education, equipment, facilities, and support necessary to perform self-care and personal hygiene in a reasonably private environment. E. At least monthly the facility Assistant Director or designee will review a minimum of 10% of the custody/housing assessment reports in Juvenile Tracking System (JTS) to ensure compliance with DJJ policy. Inaccurate reports will be corrected the day the inaccuracy is discovered and the youth will be housed according to the corrected assessment. VIII. LOCAL OPERATING PROCEDURES REQUIRED: YES Location of the housing plan within the facility.