EXTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT

Similar documents
Medicaid Managed Specialty Supports and Services Concurrent 1915(b)/(c) Waiver Program FY 17 Attachment P7.9.1

King County Regional Support Network

QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (QAPIP) 2016

Florida Agency for Health Care Administration

State Fiscal Year 2017 Validation of Performance Measures for Region 7 Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority

Southwest Michigan Behavioral Health

QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (QAPIP) FY18

Attachment F STC Compliance

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REPORT ON VALUE- BASED PURCHASING

Medicaid and CHIP Managed Care Final Rule MLTSS

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Office of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Quality Assessment Performance Improvement Program (QAPIP) POLICY

Page 1 of 6 ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

DOCUMENTATION OF MANAGED SPECIALTY SERVICES AND SUPPORTS WAIVER CAPITATION RATES QUARTERS 1 AND 2 OF STATE FISCAL YEAR 2016

ATTACHMENT II EXHIBIT II-C Effective Date: June 1, 2017 CHRONIC DISEASE SPECIALTY PLAN

Habilitation Supports Waiver(HSW) Focus on Quality and Compliance

Anti-Fraud Plan Scripps Health Plan Services, Inc.

ATTACHMENT II EXHIBIT II-C Effective Date: February 1, 2018 SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS SPECIALTY PLAN

Wayne State University. Student Handbooks linear feet. 5 manuscript boxes.

Triennial Compliance Assessment. HealthPartners. Performed under Interagency Agreement for: Minnesota Department of Human Services

NCQA Medicaid Managed Care Toolkit 2014 Health Plan Accreditation Standards

Florida Medicaid. Revised Comprehensive Quality Strategy Update

Florida Medicaid. Managed Care Quality Assessment and Improvement Strategies. 2011/2012 Update

Medicaid Transformation Overview & Update. Kelly Crosbie, MSW, LCSW Project Lead Quality & Population Health Division of Health Benefits

Monitoring Medicaid Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) and Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs):

Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicaid Integrity Program

Medicaid and CHIP Managed Care Final Rule (CMS-2390-F)

Managed Care, CHIP Delivered in Managed Care, and Revisions Related to Third. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

(3) The limitations and exclusions listed here are in addition to those described in OAR and in each of the Division chapter 410 OARs.

EQRO Year 1 Toolkit for Counties Participating in the DMC-ODS Waiver

2006 Annual Technical Report

The CMS Medicaid Managed Care Final Rule An Overview for Behavioral Health Directors. Linnea Koopmans Senior Policy Analyst December 14, 2016

Overview and History of the Community Mental Health Authority of Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties 2012

Final Report. HealthPartners, Inc. And Group Health, Inc. Quality Assurance Examination

ATTACHMENT II EXHIBIT II-C Effective Date: February 1, 2018 HIV/AIDS SPECIALTY PLAN

ATTACHMENT II EXHIBIT II-C Effective Date: February 1, 2018 CHIILD WELFARE SPECIALTY PLAN

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Health Insurance Administration

POLICY TITLE: CONTINUED STAY REVIEWS EFFECTIVE DATE REVISED DATE. (Signature)

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Reporting of Consumer Critical Event, Sentinel Event, and Death Policy POLICY

SFY EXTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW TECHNICAL REPORT

Managed Long-Term Services and Supports: Understanding the Impact of the New Medicaid Managed Care Regulations

Alternative in lieu of Services under Managed Care

may request a second opinion from the MCCMH Executive Director.

ATTACHMENT II EXHIBIT II-C Effective Date: February 1, 2018 CHRONIC DISEASE SPECIALTY PLAN

Effective date of issue: March 1, 2004 (Revised September 1, 2009) Page 1 of 7 STATE OF MARYLAND JUDICIARY. Policy on Telework

Subject: Member Pre-Authorization Page 1 of 5

[LICENSED AND ACCREDITED ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL/CLINIC/OTHER]

Putting Nanotechnology on the Map

STATEMENT OF WORK I. Health Plan s responsibilities, including financial obligations to provide or arrange for Medicaid benefits

Food Service Management Company (FSMC) Monitoring Form Contracting Entities (CEs) use this form to monitor the FSMC s operation of the program.

Contents. 1. Executive Summary Overview of Survey Results. 3. RD Compensation

2017 Long-Term Care Quality Improvement Program (QIP) Program Description & Measurement Specifications

National Council of State Boards of Nursing February Requirements for Accrediting Agencies. and. Criteria for APRN Certification Programs

HOME HEALTH CARE PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONSULTANTS

USING EXTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF PREVENTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN

MI Health Link Calendar Year 2016 Medicaid Capitation Rate Development

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL TEXAS HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION

Ch. 221 RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Subpart B. RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IDENTIFICATION AND QUALIFICATION

Floyd County Public Schools 140 Harris Hart Road NE Floyd, VA 24091

CDBG Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Administration Plan Requirements

FEB DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Legislative Report TRANSFORMATION AND REORGANIZATION OF NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAID AND NC HEALTH CHOICE PROGRAMS SESSION LAW

Schedule C1. Community Pharmacy Anti-Coagulation Management Services

NC TIDE 2016 Fall Conference November 14, Department of Health and Human Services NC Medicaid Reform Update

February 26, Dear State Health Official:

2018 Marble Easter Offering Grant Application. NAME OF ORGANIZATION: (501)(c)(3) entity Yes No AMOUNT OF REQUESTED GRANT: $10,000 ; $5,000 ; $2,500

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Appropriate Professionals for Utilization Management Decision Making POLICY

Heather Leschinsky Administrator II, Managed Care and HCBS Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services Medicaid and Long-Term Care

ATTACHMENT II. Medicaid Reform Fee-for-Service Provider Service Network Model Contract. AS AMENDED EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 2006January 1, 2008

Network Monitoring and Management

A. Directly-Operated Provider New Employee Orientation

This document describes the internal Harbor Health Plan's criteria for credentialing and recredentialing.

CAH SWING BED BILLING, CODING AND DOCUMENTATION. Lisa Pando, Sr. Consultant GPS Healthcare Consultants

CMS-3819-F Condition of participation: Reporting OASIS information. (a) Standard: Encoding and transmitting OASIS data. An HHA must encode

Subject: Re-Credentialing Verification (Page 1 of 5)

Policy Subject Index Number Section Subsection Category Contact Last Revised References Applicable To Detail MISSION STATEMENT: OVERVIEW:

2017 CAMH. What s New July 2017 Release Effective as Noted

Radiology/Nuclear Medicine Section

HEALTH DEPARTMENT Health Systems Division. An Inventory of Its Health Maintenance Organizations Files

POLICY: FUNDRAISING Document number

FORGING SUCCESSFUL PARTNERSHIPS BETWEEN HEALTH PLANS AND STATES

Licensing Personal Care Assistance Services - A Report to the 2013 Minnesota Legislature

STATE HEALTH INSURANCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SHIP) FY 2011 SHIP Basic Program Announcement and Grant Renewal Application

(b) Self-determination and participation. The resident shall have the right to:

NORTHCARE NETWORK POLICY TITLE: Training Policy EFFECTIVE DATE: 6/26/02 REVIEW DATE: 12/13/16. RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Training Coordinator

RULES OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF HEALTH CARE FACILITIES CHAPTER STANDARDS FOR QUALITY OF CARE FOR HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY 2009 NEVADA. Text7:

Compliance Program. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. and Its Affiliated Companies

Final Report. PrimeWest Health System

Institutional Handbook of Operating Procedures Policy Responsible Vice President: Executive Vice President and CEO, Health System

2013 Application for Participation

OREGON PRACTITIONER CREDENTIALING APPLICATION (Not an Employment Application)

Section V: To be completed by the PIHP contract manager as applicable. Section VI: To be completed by the PIHP Credentialing Committee as applicable.

C. HUMAN RESOURCES LIASON MCCMH administrative employee who communicates with the Macomb County Human Resource and Labor Relations Department.

Medicaid Managed Care Rule Update Frequently Asked Questions

Children and Adults Health Programs Group. November 18, 2014

Disability Rights California

VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS

Behavior Rehabilitation Services (BRS)

Transcription:

Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) EXCERPTS Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Administration Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans 2015 2016 EXTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT for Region 7 Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority October 2016 3133 East Camelback Road, Suite 100 Phoenix, AZ 85016-4545 Phone 602.801.6600 Fax 602.801.6051

1. Overview for Region 7 Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), Public Law 105-33, requires that states conduct an annual evaluation of their managed care organizations (MCOs) and prepaid inpatient health plans (PIHPs) to determine the MCOs and PIHPs compliance with regulations, contractual requirements, and the state s quality strategy. The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS), Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Administration has elected to complete this requirement by contracting with an external quality review organization (EQRO). Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. (HSAG), is the EQRO for MDHHS. The prior year 2014 2015 compliance review addressed the PIHPs compliance with federal regulations and contract requirements for these 15 standards: Standard I Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Program (QAPIP) Plan and Structure Standard II Performance Measurement and Improvement Standard III Practice Guidelines Standard IV Staff Qualifications and Training Standard V Utilization Management Standard VI Customer Services Standard VII Enrollee Grievance Process Standard VIII Enrollee Rights and Protections Standard IX Subcontracts and Delegation Standard X Provider Network Standard XI Credentialing Standard XII Access and Availability Standard XIII Coordination of Care Standard XIV Appeals Standard XV Disclosure of Ownership, Control, and Criminal Convictions The 2015 2016 follow-up review evaluated the PIHP s implementation of corrective actions for these standards to address areas of noncompliance identified in the 2014 2015 review. This report documents the findings from HSAG s follow-up review of Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority s performance in complying with requirements that had not been previously met. Region 7 2015 2016 External Quality Review Compliance Monitoring Report Page 1-1

2. Summary of the 2015 2016 Compliance Monitoring Review for Region 7 Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority The 2015 2016 compliance monitoring review was a follow-up review assessing Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority s implementation of corrective actions for elements that received a score of Substantially Met, Partially Met, or Not Met in the 2014 2015 compliance review to determine whether or not these corrective actions resulted in compliance with the federal and contractual requirements. Standards that achieved a score of 100 percent in 2014 2015 were not included in the 2015 2016 follow-up review. Elements in the remaining standards that received a score of Met were also excluded. The 2015 2016 compliance monitoring review for Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority was conducted via a teleconference call between key PIHP staff and the HSAG review team. The review processes and scoring methodology used by HSAG in evaluating Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority s compliance were consistent with the CMS EQR Protocol 1: Assessment of Compliance with Medicaid Managed Care Regulations: A Mandatory Protocol for External Quality Review (EQR), Version 2.0, September 2012. 2-1 The findings for the 2015 2016 compliance monitoring review were determined from a review of documents submitted by Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority to HSAG and interviews with key Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority staff members. Prior to the scheduled interview sessions, HSAG conducted a desk review of documentation submitted by the PIHP. Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority completed the Documentation Request and Evaluation Tool with a detailed description of corrective actions implemented to address the recommendations from the prior review and provided supporting documentation in the form of policies and procedures, member and provider informational materials, and other documents to provide evidence of the PIHP s implementation of the corrective actions and compliance with the requirements, as detailed in the compliance monitoring tool shown in Appendix A of this report. Based on the results of findings from the review of documentation, as well as information provided by the PIHP staff members during the interviews, HSAG assigned each individual element reviewed a score of Met, Substantially Met, Partially Met, Not Met, or Not Applicable. Table 2-1 presents the results of the 2015 2016 follow-up compliance review of Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority. The table shows the number of elements for each of the 15 standards that received a score of Met in the prior year (2014 2015) compliance review and the number of elements that received a score of Met, Substantially Met, Partially Met, Not Met, or Not Applicable in the current year (2015 2016) follow-up review. Because only those elements that had received scores of Substantially Met, Partially Met, or Not Met were evaluated during the follow-up review, all elements that received scores of Met and/or standards with scores of 100 percent compliance in 2014 2015 remained unchanged and were included in the 2015 2016 scores. 2-1 Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. EQR Protocol 1: Assessment of Compliance with Medicaid Managed Care Regulations: A Mandatory Protocol for External Quality Review (EQR), Version 2.0, September 2012. Available at: http://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid-chip-program-information/by- Topics/Quality-of-Care/Quality-of-Care-External-Quality-Review.html. Accessed on: Feb 19, 2013. Region 7 2015 2016 External Quality Review Compliance Monitoring Report Page 2-1

SUMMARY OF THE 2015 2016 COMPLIANCE MONITORING REVIEW Table 2-1 presents the total compliance score for each of the standards as well as the overall compliance score across all standards for the 2015 2016 follow-up review. Table 2-1 Summary of Compliance Scores Prior Year (2014 2015) and Current Year (2015 2016) Combined Number of Elements Standard Total Applicable Elements Prior Year Current Year M M SM PM NM NA 2015 2016 Total Compliance Score I QAPIP Plan and Structure 20 20 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% II Performance Measurement and Improvement 24 24 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% III Practice Guidelines 14 14 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% IV Staff Qualifications and Training 6 6 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% V Utilization Management 21 21 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% VI Customer Services 10 10 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% VII Enrollee Grievance Process 13 13 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% VIII Enrollee Rights and Protections 33 32 1 0 0 0 0 100% IX Subcontracts and Delegation 4 4 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% X Provider Network 13 13 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% XI Credentialing 6 6 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% XII Access and Availability 17 16 1 0 0 0 0 100% XIII Coordination of Care 4 4 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% XIV Appeals 15 15 NO FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED 100% XV Disclosure of Ownership, Control, and Criminal Convictions 8 4 4 0 0 0 0 100% Overall Compliance 208 202 6 0 0 0 0 100% M = Met, SM = Substantially Met, PM = Partially Met, NM = Not Met, NA = Not Applicable Total # of Applicable Elements: The total number of elements within each standard minus any elements that received a score of NA. Total Compliance Score: The overall percentages were obtained by adding the number of elements that received a score of Met in the prior review plus the number of elements that received a score of Met in the current review to the weighted (multiplied by 0.75) number of elements that received a score of Substantially Met and the weighted (multiplied by 0.50) number that received a score of Partially Met, then dividing this total by the total number of applicable elements. Region 7 2015 2016 External Quality Review Compliance Monitoring Report Page 2-2

SUMMARY OF THE 2015 2016 COMPLIANCE MONITORING REVIEW In the 2014 2015 compliance review, Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority demonstrated full compliance with all requirements for Standard I QAPIP Plan and Structure, Standard II Performance Measurement and Improvement, Standard III Practice Guidelines, Standard IV Staff Qualifications and Training, Standard V Utilization Management, Standard VI Customer Services, Standard VII Enrollee Grievance Process, Standard IX Subcontracts and Delegation, Standard X Provider Network, Standard XI Credentialing, Standard XIII Coordination of Care, and Standard XIV Appeals. Therefore, follow-up was not required for these standards. In the 2015 2016 follow-up review, Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority showed strong performance. The PIHP implemented corrective actions and demonstrated full compliance with all elements addressed in the follow-up review for Standard VIII Enrollee Rights and Protections; Standard XII Access and Availability; and Standard XV Disclosure of Ownership, Control, and Criminal Convictions. HSAG identified no continued opportunities for improvement for Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority. Appendix A presents the scores for the review of the standards as well as detailed findings for elements scored Substantially Met, Partially Met, or Not Met after the follow-up review. Region 7 2015 2016 External Quality Review Compliance Monitoring Report Page 2-3